Conspiracy

CONSPIRACY

History’s greatest plots, collusions & cover ups

Charlotte Greig

with contributions from Nigel Cawthorne

Introduction

Post 9/11, we are in a golden age of the conspiracy theory. Nowadays, it’s not just crazed loners who spend too much time on the internet discussing why the NSA is gathering all that digital information on every US citizen, or whether the Russians helped Donald Trump get elected, or even why George Bush carried on reading a children’s story after being told the first plane had hit the World Trade Centre. And many more are scanning the business pages to find out whether the War on Terror is really the war for more oil.

Often enough, yesterday’s conspiracy theory is today’s accepted history. If you’d said at the time that Hitler started the Reichstag Fire himself to smear his Communist opposition you’d have been called paranoid. Now it’s an accepted fact. And how many people today really believe that JFK was assassinated by Lee Harvey Oswald acting all alone? And are we wrong to see conspiracies in the links between, say, the US government and Halliburton or Enron? Or naïve not to?

Of course, not all conspiracy theories have a basis in fact. Some are outlandish, such as the theory that the world is hollow and inhabited at the centre; others, such as the notion that the government is hushing up alien visitations here, there and everywhere, seem like the stuff of X-Files episodes. Yet all of them, even the most bizarre, address facts that cannot easily be explained, or point to our psychological need to find a reason for everything that takes place in our world.

Then there are those conspiracy theories that hover entertainingly on the edge of possibility: for example, the idea that the moon landings were faked up in a film studio. And, of course, there’s not a celebrity death without its attendant conspiracy theory. Was Princess Diana murdered? Is Elvis still alive? Was the FBI really behind John Lennon’s murder? To some, these theories simply demonstrate our human tendency to deny death and loss, to let our idols go; to others, they reveal the sinister currents of money and power that run below the public life of any celebrated figure in our culture today.

This book gathers together more than forty of the most compelling conspiracies: ranging from the genuinely credible to the frankly implausible, from paedophile conspiracies to crop circles, from WikiLeaks and the death of Alexander Litvinenko to the Holy Grail. Was Pearl Harbor a set-up? Was Marilyn Monroe murdered? We may not have the answers, but we’ve got some pretty good theories!

What is a Conspiracy Theory?

The word conspiracy comes from the Latin conspirare. Literally it means to breathe together. In practice, it refers to two or more people making a plan of action that other parties are not told about. Theoretically that plan could be either good or bad, but over the centuries it has gained a distinctly negative sense. You can see this clearly from the way in which the word is used in the legal sphere: conspiracy in a legal sense always refers to wrongdoing.

Conspiracies are not by definition secret, but as the word has attached itself to criminal behaviour that’s almost inevitably a part of the package. So, over the years, secrecy has become a part of our conventional sense of what a conspiracy is. And it’s a crucial part when it comes to the development of conspiracy theories. Essentially, conspiracy theories are alternative explanations of history or of the world about us. Conspiracy theories suggest that dramatic events happen not by accident or for apparent reasons, but because of plans made in secrecy.

There’s no doubt that conspiracy theories have been with us for thousands of years. After all, conspiracies certainly have. Whether it’s the ancient Greeks conspiring to take over Troy or the Caesar’s rivals conspiring to assassinate him, history is full of dramatic conspiracies. And there have always been people with a suspicious cast of mind who’ve come up with conspiracy theories to explain such events.

However, it’s only in the past hundred years or so that conspiracy theories have really come to the fore. Perhaps that has something to do with the decline of religion. In the past people tended to see inexplicable events as the work of the Almighty. In our more secular times, however, people tend to look for the nefarious hand of man.

The late nineteenth century saw the birth of some enduring conspiracy theories. As the world was changing fast through industrialization, and the old certainties of life were being shattered, many people started to suspect that there was some powerful organization controlling all this, some group who were effectively setting themselves up as rivals to God. The prime candidates for this role, in a Europe in which anti-Semitism had long been rife, were the Jewish communities. The idea of an international Jewish conspiracy began to gain credence, especially in Russia in the turbulent years leading up to the First World War. Other candidates for the role of secret rulers of the world included the Freemasons, the Communists, and the semi-mythical group known as the Illuminati.

Such visions of a world controlled by a small and sinister cabal are still a popular element in conspiracy theories today. In fact, they lie behind almost every conspiracy theory there is. So perhaps the answer to the question what is a conspiracy theory? should be it’s a theory which suggests that the great world events are not what they seem; rather, they are the manifestations of a world controlled by a secret elite.

Conspiracy Theories Today

There has been an explosion of interest in conspiracy theories in recent years. There are many possible reasons for this – loss of faith in religion, as mentioned above, loss of faith in politicians, a sensationalist mass media that likes to broadcast sensational theories, the influence of films and novels espousing conspiracies, and so on. One major factor is undoubtedly the growth of the internet. The internet is the perfect medium for spreading conspiracy theories. Where once a rumour would be passed around a chosen few insiders and spread slowly through the metropolitan grapevine – for example, the rumour about the identity of the masked man at the London sex parties at the heart of the Profumo affair, or the one about the identity of the Watergate source known as Deep Throat – these days, it will be on the internet in minutes and instantly transmitted around the world.

Thus today, when a major event occurs – take 9/11 for example – conspiracy theories immediately start to circulate on the internet. Evidence that the authorities would prefer to have kept quiet is now available to be discussed and interpreted from America to Australia. The trouble is, of course, that so too are lies, fabrications and delusions. The internet is at once a marvellous tool for avoiding censorship and allowing the voice of truth to emerge, and also a forum in which every lunatic and partisan commentator can have their say in the era of fake news. Today, when so many conspiracy theories appear on the internet, it is sometimes a difficult business to determine which ones are worthy of serious consideration and which are simply hearsay.

This dilemma has never been clearer than when dealing with the events of 9/11 and the subsequent war on terror. The extraordinary success of Michael Moore’s documentary film Fahrenheit 911 saw conspiracy theories go mainstream. The film takes seriously a number of conspiracy theories that might previously have been thought outlandish. As a result, audiences have been polarized. Some saw the film as irresponsible, others saw it as voicing the truths that the regular news media was scared to utter. Ultimately audience responses tended to depend on what side of the political fence the viewer happened to be sitting on. This is hardly surprising: conspiracy theories always tend to appeal to those whose political views are in opposition to those in power.

Political Conspiracies

This book will attempt to offer an unbiased investigation into several aspects of state surveillance in the digital age and leave the reader to make up their own mind. We’ll explore the various conspiracy theories relating to the events of 9/11. We’ll try to make sense of the mysterious last moments of Flight MH370, the plane that disappeared. We’ll look into the accusation that the war on Afghanistan was a war on oil and we’ll investigate the tangled links between the Bush family and the Bin Ladens.

Political conspiracy theories are nothing new, of course. So we’ll also look into some of the classic political mysteries of yesteryear. We’ll investigate the sinking of the Lusitania asking who really sank the ocean liner – the event that persuaded the USA to join in World War I. And what about Pearl Harbor? Did Roosevelt really let it happen in order to persuade Americans to join in World War II? We’ll look into one of the longest-running and most pernicious of all conspiracy theories as we explore just why people want to deny that the Holocaust ever happened. And on a slightly lighter note, we’ll look into whether Adolf Hitler could really have escaped the bunker by a secret tunnel and fled to Antarctica with Eva Braun.

Coming closer to the present, we’ll examine the string of suspicious deaths and assassinations that occurred during the 1960s. The most celebrated of these, the murder of JFK, is perhaps the ultimate conspiracy theory, with endless books, films and TV programmes devoted to it. The murder of radical black American leader Malcolm X and even the death of film star Marilyn Monroe have also attracted their fair share of speculation, and we’ll also discuss these cases.

Many conspiracy theories relate to the existence of Secret Societies, and we’ll be looking into several of these. We’ll investigate The Bilderberg Group and attempt to establish whether this shadowy group is really running our world. And – if you’re one of those who noticed that, in some previous American Presidential elections, both main candidates belonged to the same secret society – well, we’ll be looking into the weird world of Skull and Bones, the Yale-based organization whose members include both Presidents Bush. Could it really be the American branch of the Illuminati? And who, or what, is the Illuminati? Formed in 1776, have its members, the illuminated ones, really been the secret power behind the throne throughout modern history?

Religion has always attracted its share of conspiracy theories, too, so we’ll take a tour around the strange stories that surround the Holy Grail. Could Mary Magdalen have smuggled Christianity’s most precious relic out of the Holy Land and into Western Europe, where it remains hidden to this day? Closer to the present, there is the bizarre death of Roberto Calvi, nicknamed God’s banker. Could the Pope’s business chiefs really have been hand in glove with the Mafia?

Conspiracies and the Cult of Celebrity

The cult of celebrity is one of the hallmarks of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, so it is not surprising that, in recent years, many conspiracy theorists have turned their attention away from politics and religion towards the lives and deaths of the famous. We’ll look into the allegations that certain celebrities, like Elvis and Tupac Shakur, remain alive, and ask whether there is any possible evidence to support these notions. And we’ll also investigate the even stranger theory that Beatle Paul McCartney is actually dead.

And here we move onto the theories that read like the stuff of science fiction. One of the most enduring conspiracy theories of this type maintains that the moon landings were faked. Could this possibly be true? And what of extraterrestrial happenings and alien visitation? What really happened at Roswell? Or at Rendlesham Forest? Is there life on Mars? And how can we explain crop circles?

Stranger than Fiction

Conspiracy theories, then, come in all shapes and sizes. There are those that seem to be taken from the pages of science fiction novels or thrillers. Indeed, many of them do crop up in popular fiction, not least Dan Brown’s enormously popular Da Vinci Code, which draws from a whole tradition of Holy Grail conspiracies dating back for over a thousand years. Yet while many conspiracy theories are more entertaining than realistic, there are some that reveal genuinely disturbing information and ask important questions about secrecy in the way we are governed and receive information.

In the end it is for you, the reader, to decide which theories to believe, and which to dismiss. So prepare to enter into a world much stranger than fiction: the world of the conspiracy theory.

Chapter One: They’ve Got Your Number

Just because they call you paranoid doesn’t mean they aren’t out to get you. I mean, who can you trust these days? It’s now proven beyond reasonable doubt that countries today spend billions spying on their own citizens, hoovering up vast quantities of information, usually in the name of counter-terrorism. But why did they never tell us what they were up to? And why did they wait until troubled insiders gave the game away? Perhaps we should be grateful to the whistle-blowers who let us in on state secrets.

WikiLeaks: Biting Back

On 19 June 2012, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange walked into the Ecuadorian Embassy in London and claimed political asylum. This was granted a month later. However, Assange was wanted on a European Arrest Warrant for alleged sexual offences in Sweden. British police guarded the embassy and Assange would be arrested and deported to Sweden if he stepped outside the door.

His fear was that the Swedes would hand him over to the United States where he risked prosecution for espionage, among other things, over the Chelsea Manning case – Manning (born Bradley Edward Manning) had culled hundreds of thousands of diplomatic cables and sensitive material concerning the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan which WikiLeaks had published. In the US, Assange could face the death penalty. But although he was confined to a single room while the work of the Ecuadorian Embassy went on around him, Assange is thought to have influenced the outcome of the 2016 American presidential election – with the help of the Russians. While WikiLeaks was set up to expose conspiracies, Assange was accused of using it to participate in one himself.

Julian Assange appears at a window of The Ecuador Embassy in London. He couldn’t leave the building for fear of being arrested, yet continued to influence events around the world.

Anti-Hillary

Assange had a personal beef against Hillary Clinton, accusing her of pushing to have him indicted after WikiLeaks published a quarter of a million diplomatic cables from her term as secretary of state provided by Manning. Having read thousands of her cables, he said: Hillary lacks judgement and will push the United States into endless, stupid wars which spread terrorism.… She certainly should not become president of the United States.

During the Democratic Party primaries, WikiLeaks published more emails from Hillary’s private email server, leading to calls for her to be indicted. Then while making it clear to Robert Peston of the UK’s ITV News that he viewed Hillary as a personal enemy, he made an attempt to appear impartial. After the Republican Convention confirmed Donald Trump as its candidate, Assange said that choosing between Clinton and Trump was like opting for cholera over gonorrhoea – personally, I would prefer neither.

While the FBI concluded that Hillary had been extremely careless with her emails, no charges were ever filed. However, the State Department did reopen its investigation.

On the eve of the Democratic Convention, WikiLeaks released emails from the Democratic National Convention that appeared to show the committee favouring presumptive Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton over Sanders during the primaries. This led to the resignation of DNC chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

But where had these emails come from? Cybersecurity experts quickly concluded that the Russians had hacked the DNC. Bob Gourley, former Chief of Technology for the Defense Intelligence Agency, said: The software code that I have seen from the hack had all the tell-tale signs of being Russian, including code re-used from other attacks. This is a really big deal. Some people in the community are saying this is the Russians pretending to be a hacker, then giving that information to Julian Assange all as part of an operation.

The security firm Crowstrike, who had previously investigated hacks at the White House, Pentagon and State Department, also concluded that the DNC hacks were carried out by the Russians. It found that there were two separate Russian intelligence-affiliated adversaries present in the DNC network. Assange retaliated by accusing Clinton of causing hysteria about Russia.

There is no proof of that whatsoever, he said. We have not disclosed our source, and of course, this is a diversion that’s being pushed by the Hillary Clinton campaign.

Hillary’s hell

WikiLeaks went on to produce an October surprise – that is, a damaging political furore before the election in early November – by leaking the emails of John Podesta, chairman of the Clinton campaign. The FBI then discovered fresh emails on a laptop belonging to Clinton aide Huma Abedin’s husband, Anthony Weiner, during an investigation of his sexting scandals and the investigation was opened up again. The Washington Post pointed out that the subject of Hillary’s emails came up in the news agenda every time her lead in the polls grew.

But perhaps the real culprit is WikiLeaks, strategically releasing hacked emails, and thereby demanding media attention, whenever Clinton’s lead expands, said the newspaper.

During the second presidential debate, Clinton accused Russian hackers, working on the orders of President Vladimir Putin, of leaking information through WikiLeaks in an attempt to influence the election in favour of Trump. In response, Trump refused to condemn Putin, but said he would not condone hacking by Russia or by anyone else.

Assange defended WikiLeaks’ actions, saying: We publish material given to us if it is of political, diplomatic, historical or ethical importance and which has not been published elsewhere. When we have material that fulfils these criteria, we publish.

So was the release of Hillary Clinton’s emails part of a conspiracy by Vladimir Putin to ensure Trump was elected? Not if you listen to Assange. He insists WikiLeaks had received leaked emails from the DNC, but none from the Trump campaign and they could not publish what they did not have. After Trump won the