Marx and Heidegger
By Gerry Stahl
()
About this ebook
Marx countered the ideology of individualism by analyzing social structures and interpersonal interactions at different units of analysis than the individual person. Heidegger also questioned the traditional ontology of natural objects with innate attributes by proposing dynamic interactive processes of beings in their ecological context.
Today, the philosophies of Marx and Heidegger are still extremely relevant—provided one adapts them to the current socio-historical context and adjusts each to the implicit criticisms of the other.
Gerry Stahl
Gerry Stahl's professional research is in the theory and analysis of CSCL (Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning). In 2006 Stahl published "Group Cognition: Computer Support for Building Collaborative Knowledge" (MIT Press) and launched the "International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning". In 2009 he published "Studying Virtual Math Teams" (Springer), in 2013 "Translating Euclid," in 2015 a longitudinal study of math cognitive development in "Constructing Dynamic Triangles Together" (Cambridge U.), and in 2021 "Theoretical Investigations: Philosophical Foundations of Group Cognition" (Springer). All his work outside of these academic books is published for free in volumes of essays at Smashwords (or at Lulu as paperbacks at minimal printing cost). Gerry Stahl earned his BS in math and science at MIT. He earned a PhD in continental philosophy and social theory at Northwestern University, conducting his research at the Universities of Heidelberg and Frankfurt. He later earned a PhD in computer science at the University of Colorado at Boulder. He is now Professor Emeritus at the College of Computation and Informatics at Drexel University in Philadelphia. His website--containing all his publications, materials on CSCL and further information about his work--is at http://GerryStahl.net.
Read more from Gerry Stahl
Adventures In Dynamic Geometry Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWorks of 3-D Form Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIntroductions To ijCSCL Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDynamic Geometry Game for Pods Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGlobal Introduction To CSCL Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEssays In Social Philosophy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEssays in Online Mathematics Interaction Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStudying Virtual Math Teams (pre-publication version) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOverview and Autobiographical Essays Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEssays In Personalizable Software Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsConstructing Dynamic Triangles Together (pre_publication version) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Marx and Heidegger
Related ebooks
Reading Negri: Marxism in the Age of Empire Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsToward a Concrete Philosophy: Heidegger and the Emergence of the Frankfurt School Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAnalyzing Marx: Morality, Power and History Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEssays in Social Philosophy: Gerry Stahl's eLibrary, #7 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInfinite Autonomy: The Divided Individual in the Political Thought of G. W. F. Hegel and Friedrich Nietzsche Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHegel's Philosophy of Mind Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Philosophy of Hegel: Collected Works: Philosophy of Mind, Phenomenology of Mind, Aesthetics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPhilosophy of History (Barnes & Noble Library of Essential Reading) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Way of the Platonic Socrates Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Problem of the Fetish Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPhenomenology and the Problem of Meaning in Human Life and History Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhitehead's The Function of Reason Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPhilosophy of History (Barnes & Noble Digital Library) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAnarchism: With linked Table of Contents Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Philosophy of Art (Barnes & Noble Library of Essential Reading) Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Twilight of the Idols and The Anti-Christ Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEternal Return and the Metaphysics of Presence: "A Critical Reading of Heidegger’s Nietzsche" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Maxim Gorky MEGAPACK®: 61 Classic Novels and Stories Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Companion to Wittgenstein Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Marxist Left Review #19: Resisting Barbarism: Contours of the Global Rebellion Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Metaphysics of Self-realisation and Freedom: Part 1 of The Liberal Socialism of Thomas Hill Green Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsState and Class: A Sociology of International Affairs Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Death of Philosophy: Reference and Self-reference in Contemporary Thought Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLocke on Personal Identity: Consciousness and Concernment - Updated Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsScience of Logic Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAn Introduction to Philosophy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA History of English Philosophy: From Francis Bacon to Utilitarianism Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Health, Luck, and Justice Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMoral Science; a Compendium of Ethics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLife, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Dao: Ancient Chinese Thought in Modern American Life Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Teaching Methods & Materials For You
Dumbing Us Down - 25th Anniversary Edition: The Hidden Curriculum of Compulsory Schooling Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Financial Feminist: Overcome the Patriarchy's Bullsh*t to Master Your Money and Build a Life You Love Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Never Split the Difference: Negotiating As If Your Life Depended On It Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Grit: The Power of Passion and Perseverance Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Lies My Teacher Told Me: Everything Your American History Textbook Got Wrong Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5On Writing Well, 30th Anniversary Edition: An Informal Guide to Writing Nonfiction Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Weapons of Mass Instruction: A Schoolteacher's Journey Through the Dark World of Compulsory Schooling Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fluent in 3 Months: How Anyone at Any Age Can Learn to Speak Any Language from Anywhere in the World Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Writing to Learn: How to Write - and Think - Clearly About Any Subject at All Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Verbal Judo, Second Edition: The Gentle Art of Persuasion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Jack Reacher Reading Order: The Complete Lee Child’s Reading List Of Jack Reacher Series Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Speed Reading: Learn to Read a 200+ Page Book in 1 Hour: Mind Hack, #1 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Inside American Education Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Personal Finance for Beginners - A Simple Guide to Take Control of Your Financial Situation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Closing of the American Mind Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The 5 Love Languages of Children: The Secret to Loving Children Effectively Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Principles: Life and Work Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Take Smart Notes. One Simple Technique to Boost Writing, Learning and Thinking Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Raising Human Beings: Creating a Collaborative Partnership with Your Child Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap...And Others Don't Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Learn French - Parallel Text - Easy Stories (English - French) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Dance of Anger: A Woman's Guide to Changing the Patterns of Intimate Relationships Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Study Guide for Octavia Butler's "Parable of the Sower" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Three Bears Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Anxious Generation - Workbook Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Divided Mind: The Epidemic of Mindbody Disorders Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Marx and Heidegger
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Marx and Heidegger - Gerry Stahl
Introduction
T
his volume contains my doctoral dissertation in philosophy at Northwestern University. It was entitled: "Marxian Hermeneutics and Heideggerian Social Theory: Interpreting and Transforming Our World." The dissertation was defended on May 8, 1975.
The original typewritten version was scanned, and an electronic version was created on the 25th anniversary of the document. Changes were limited to minor stylistic improvements and the graphics. Digital copies are available in html and pdf format at: http://GerryStahl.net/publications/dissertations/philosophy.
Additional graphics were added for the 35th anniversary edition.
The dissertation considers the two most important philosophers of the modern age. When I was there, Northwestern had the only American department of philosophy that encouraged the study of European philosophy. I also conducted my research during three years in Germany: at Heidelberg, where Heidegger’s work was continued, and at Frankfurt, where critical theory extended Marx’ thinking.
After completing the dissertation, I published two journal articles related to the dissertation:
Stahl, G. (1975). The jargon of authenticity: An introduction to a Marxist critique of Heidegger. Boundary 2. III(2), 489-498. Web: http://GerryStahl.net/publications/interpretations/jargon.htm.
Stahl, G. (1976). Attuned to Being: Heideggerian music in technological society. Boundary 2. IV(2), 637-664. Web: http://GerryStahl.net/publications/interpretations/attuned.pdf.
In 2021, during my retirement, I returned to the themes of these articles and wrote a new presentation of my views:
Stahl, G. (2021). The working of aural being in electronic music. In C. Rentmeester & J. R. Warren (Eds.), Heidegger and music. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Web: http://GerryStahl.net/pub/music.pdf.
I have appended this new discussion to my original dissertation because it shows strikingly how the ideas have persisted in my thinking over a period of almost fifty years, as well as how they have matured. This new presentation may be my clearest expression of the ideas of my philosophic views in the 1970s.
During my intervening academic career, I applied conceptual and methodological perspectives from Marx and Heidegger to the theory of CSCL (computer-supported collaborative learning), developing a theory of group cognition.
In particular, Marx countered the ideology of individualism by analyzing social structures and interpersonal interactions at different units of analysis than the individual person. Heidegger also questioned the traditional ontology of natural objects with innate attributes by proposing dynamic interactive processes of beings in their ecological context.
Today, the philosophies of Marx and Heidegger are still extremely relevant—provided one adapts them to the current socio-historical context and adjusts each to the implicit criticisms of the other—as I tried to indicate in my dissertation.
Contents
Introduction
Contents
Marxian Hermeneutics and Heideggerian Social Theory:
Abstract
Preface .
Part I: Interpreting Marx and Heidegger in Our World
Chapter I. The Alternative of Marx and Heidegger
Interpretation for Transformation
Interpreting Marx and Heidegger Together
The Hermeneutic Context
Chapter II. Heidegger’s Critique of Marx
Heidegger’s Early Criticisms
Political Distortions
Heidegger’s Mature Criticisms
Chapter III. A Marxist Critique of Heidegger
Adorno’s Early Criticisms
Adorno’s Methodology of Critique
Adorno’s Mature Criticisms
Part II. Karl Marx: Ideology Critique as Interpretation and Transformation of the World
Chapter IV. Anticipations: The Early Works
The Primacy of Commodity Production for Interpretation
The Alienated World
Ideology Critique and the Transformation of the World
Chapter V. Research: The Grundrisse
Materialistic Conceptualizations for the Self-Interpretation of the World
Historically specific Conceptualizations
Retrospective Interpretation of the History of Property Relations
Chapter VI. Presentation: Capital
The Form of Value of Commodities
Abstract Labor in Theory and Practice
Fetishism as Appearance and Reality
Part III. Martin Heidegger: Meta-Ontology as Interpretation and Transformation of the World
Transitional Remarks
Chapter VII: The Work
The Art Work and History
Art and Being
The Primacy of Being
Chapter VIII: The Thing
Thing and Stock
Technological Being
Forgetfulness of Being
Chapter IX: Being-Itself
The History of Being
Meta-ontology
The Concept of Being
Concluding Remarks
Bibliography
Vita .
Epilogue: The Working of Sonic Being in E-music
Beings in the World
(b) The Working of the Work of Art
(c) Art in the Age of Technology
(d) Relations of Artistic Form
e-Music in Socio-historical Context
References
Bio .
Marxian Hermeneutics and Heideggerian Social Theory:
Interpreting and Transforming Our World
by
Gerry Stahl
a dissertation
submitted to the Graduate School
in partial fulfillment of the requirements
for the degree
Doctor of Philosophy
Northwestern University
Evanston, Illinois
June 1975
The original typewritten version is available at Northwestern University:
Diss
378
N.U.
1975
5781m
It is indexed in Dissertation Abstracts and available from University Microfilms
© 1975
Gerry Stahl
all rights reserved
Abstract
Marxian Hermeneutics and Heideggerian Social Theory:
Interpreting and Transforming Our World
Gerry Stahl,
Northwestern University
June 1975
T
oday neither philosophy of interpretation (hermeneutics) nor philosophy of society can legitimately proceed without the other. Interpretation of the world precedes the possibility of transforming it, according to Martin Heidegger, because the presence of beings is always already meaningfully structured. For Karl Marx, however, interpretations of the world are constituted by human praxis, the reproduction and transformation of social reality. The confrontation of Marx’s thought with Heidegger’s provides an appropriate historical medium for the indispensable task of bringing the problematics of critical social theory and philosophical hermeneutics to bear upon each other.
The alternative notions, that hermeneutics either founds or is founded upon social analysis, are reconciled by interpreting Marx’s social methodology as being in accord with hermeneutic principles and by transforming Heidegger’s ontology to take account of social mediations. Thereby, Heidegger’s critique of metaphysics clarifies Marx’s methodological sophistication, rescuing Marxism from a history of mechanistic corruptions, while Marx’s insights into the power of social relations provide a corrective to the politically reactionary self-understanding, abstract form, scholastic structure and non-social content of Heidegger’s jargon.
Thinking about Marx and Heidegger together is most fruitfully accomplished by a sympathetic study of their mature approaches and systems, focusing on the relation between beings and Being, the concrete and the abstract, the individual entity and its socio-historical context. Hermeneutic, political and internal justifications for the selection of specific primary texts, for not making explicit use of secondary works, and for interpreting the two philosophers through each other’s eyes are indicated in the introductory Part I. Above all, it is argued, a contemporary perspective on Marx is inevitably affected by Heidegger’s influence as well as by intervening political developments; and similarly for reading Heidegger.
Marx’s theory of commodity fetishism plays a role analogous to Heidegger’s theory of the oblivion of Being. In both systems, the distorted appearance of things is related to the prevailing form of the Being of beings: their commodity form for Marx or their technological character for Heidegger. The commodity form of products and of human productive labor prevails in the bourgeois or capitalist era. Marx, whose methodology is specific to an analysis of this period, traces the historical and structural development of these commodity relations in primarily socio-economic terms. The way in which changes in the over-all social character are thereby related to concrete interactions provides the guiding theme of the Marx interpretation, which forms Part II.
Where Marx relates the technological character of the commodity to its actual, concrete, everyday exchange in the marketplace as historically developed, Heidegger insists that the process by which, e.g., the technological character of beings has been given, the "Ereignis," is ungrounded and incomprehensible. But such an insistence ignores the proper position of the Ereignis within Heidegger’s system: as the process of self-mediation and of totalization of all that which is present. The analogy between the role of the social character in Marx’s system and that of the Ereignis in Heidegger’s is drawn in the opening and closing remarks of Part III, the Heidegger interpretation. There it is argued that Heidegger’s alternative conceptualization weakens Marx’s sense of the historical limits of theory as well as foregoing all ability to comprehend transformations of Being or society concretely.
Considering Heidegger and Marx together suggests that Heidegger’s central fault is in failing to relate changes in Being – the historically prevalent form of presence of beings – to developments within the concrete social realm of entities. Changes of ontological interpretation can, as Marx demonstrates, be comprehended in terms of transformations within society, whereby, of course, the social theory must itself be hermeneutically appropriate.
Marxian Hermeneutics and Heideggerian Social Theory:
Interpreting and Transforming Our World
Man müsse durch die Eiswüste der Abstraktion hindurch, um zu konkretem Philosophieren bündig zu gelangen.
Preface .
T
oday neither philosophy of interpretation (hermeneutics) nor philosophy of society can legitimately proceed without the other. Interpretation of the world precedes the possibility of transforming it, according to Martin Heidegger, because the presence of beings is always already meaningfully structured. For Karl Marx, however, interpretations of the world are constituted by human praxis, the reproduction and transformation of social reality. The confrontation of Marx’s thought with Heidegger’s provides an appropriate historical medium for the indispensable task of bringing the problematics of critical social theory and philosophical hermeneutics to bear upon each other.
The alternative notions, that hermeneutics either founds or is founded upon social analysis, are reconciled by interpreting Marx’s social methodology as being in accord with hermeneutic principles and by transforming Heidegger’s ontology to take account of social mediations. Thereby, Heidegger’s critique of metaphysics clarifies Marx’s methodological sophistication, rescuing Marxism from a history of mechanistic corruptions, while Marx’s insights into the power of social relations provide a corrective to the politically reactionary self-understanding, abstract form, scholastic structure and non-social content of Heidegger’s jargon. Such a consideration of Marx and Heidegger together strengthens the position of each. Because they stand firmly within a shared post-Hegelian German tradition, the merging of their ideas proceeds by merely drawing out what is already implicitly present.
Thinking about Marx and Heidegger together is most fruitfully accomplished by a sympathetic study of their mature approaches and systems, focusing on the relation between beings and Being, the concrete and the abstract, the individual entity and its socio-historical context. This strategy determines the selection of texts to be analyzed. Rather than centering on accidentally parallel discussions of explicitly political issues, writings are chosen with the goal of developing the most important systematic and methodological themes of Marx’s and Heidegger’s thought. Their mature presentations – Volume I of Das Kapital (1867) and the lecture on Time and Being (1962) – are taken as standards, with other works drawn upon to trace the developments leading up to them. Hermeneutic, political and internal justifications for the selection of specific primary texts, for not making explicit use of secondary works, and for interpreting the two philosophers through each other’s eyes are indicated in the introductory Part I. Above all, it is argued, a contemporary perspective on Marx is inevitably affected by Heidegger’s influence as well as by intervening political developments; and similarly for reading Heidegger.
While less central points of direct contact between the writings of Marx and those of Heidegger have been ignored, several correspondences have been thematized. A primary motivating presupposition of both Marx’s and Heidegger’s project is the belief that true reality lies hidden from our direct perceptions. Marx’s theory of commodity fetishism plays a role analogous to Heidegger’s theory of the oblivion of Being. In both systems, the distorted appearance of things is related to the prevailing form of the Being of beings: their commodity form for Marx or their technological character for Heidegger. Heidegger’s technological stock
has essentially the same characteristics as Marx’s commodity.
Both forms are, furthermore, historically specific. Technological stock is the characteristic form of the Being of beings in the modern epoch, which is, according to Heidegger, historically given by Being-as-such or the Ereignis. Correspondingly, for Marx, the commodity form of products and of human productive labor prevails in the bourgeois or capitalist era. Marx, whose methodology is specific to an analysis of this period, traces the historical and structural development of these commodity relations in primarily socio-economic terms. The way in which changes in the over-all social character are thereby related to concrete interactions provides the guiding theme of the Marx interpretation, which forms Part II.
Where Marx relates the technological character of the commodity to its actual, concrete, everyday exchange in the marketplace as historically developed, Heidegger insists that the process by which, e.g., the technological character of beings has been given, the "Ereignis," is ungrounded and incomprehensible. But such an insistence ignores the proper position of the Ereignis within Heidegger’s system: as the process of self-mediation and of totalization of all that which is present. To divorce mediation from its content is hypostatization; to project social totalization beyond its socio-historical limits is to fall behind Marx’s level of methodological self-reflection. The analogy between the role of the social character in Marx’s system and that of the Ereignis in Heidegger’s is drawn in the opening and closing remarks of Part III, the Heidegger interpretation. There it is argued that Heidegger’s alternative conceptualization weakens Marx’s sense of the historical limits of theory as well as foregoing all ability to comprehend transformations of Being or society concretely.
Considering Heidegger and Marx together suggests that Heidegger’s central fault is in failing to relate changes in Being – the historically prevalent form of presence of beings – to developments within the concrete social realm of entities. Changes of ontological interpretation can, as Marx demonstrates, be comprehended in terms of transformations within society, whereby, of course, the social theory must itself be hermeneutically appropriate.
***
The methodological reflections on thinking about Marx and Heidegger together, the interpretation of Marx, and the analysis of Heidegger are each carried out in three chapters, as summarized below:
The dialectic of essence and appearance at work in the systems of both Marx and Heidegger represents a shared response to present social appearances as obscuring the potential for a better world, one which would incorporate new forms of ontological relations (Part I). But the two mainstreams of contemporary continental thought which flow from these systems, and which appeal especially to those interested in transforming the world, problematize each other. Issues both internal and external to Marx’s theory and Heidegger’s thought call for a reckoning by each with the other (Chapter I). Heidegger, for instance, accuses Marxism of adopting metaphysical
conceptualizations (Chapter II), while Marxists respond that Heidegger has ignored the impact of social conditions upon his thought (Chapter III).
Marx’s works are construed as interpretations of the social relations underlying appearances which have been distorted by capitalist relations (Part II). His early writings, Alienated Labor and Theses on Feuerbach, anticipations of his mature critique of political economy, occasionally substitute the critical appropriation of prevalent metaphysical hypotheses for the stringent methodology subsequently used (Chapter IV). Marx’s Grundrisse then develops the appropriate historical analyses, economic categories and hermeneutic methodology though theoretical research (Chapter V). Finally, Capital systematically presents the analysis of capitalist society, starting dialectically from the abstractions arrived at in the capitalist economy (Chapter VI). The hermeneutic accord between Marx’s interpretations of the world and the historic processes which reproduce and transform the world, the manifold unity of Marx’s social theory and capitalist social practice, saves Marx’s system from the charge of being metaphysical by deriving its method from its object.
Heidegger’s post-war thought offers an alternative to Marxism by focusing on the general, non-economic relationship between entities and their form of presence in a given historical epoch (Part III). The Origin of the Work of Art presents Heidegger’s reversal
toward Being-as-such, formulating his central question of Being in terms of the origin of the historically specific form of presence of a work which establishes its own presence (Chapter VII). The tendency here to give an absolute priority to Being develops in the essay The Thing, which introduces his mature theoretical framework. (Chapter VIII). Heidegger’s final statement, the lecture on Time and Being, takes a meta-ontological overview of the history of the forms of presence which, however, leaves the concrete details of historical ontological transformations shrouded in mystery (Chapter IX). Thereby, the ontological self-interpretation of the world is illegitimately divorced from its ontic self-transformation, leaving Heidegger’s social commentary content-less and messianic next to Marx’s.
***
Note: Chapter III is copywritten by the journal in which it appeared as The Jargon of Authenticity: An Introduction to a Marxist Critique of Heidegger
by Gerry Stahl (Boundary II, Department of English, SUNY-Binghamton, NY 13901, Winter 1975, pp. 439-497).
Quotations: All quotations are given in English. Translations from the German are based upon the best available English versions, but are revised without notice for increased literalness and consistency. References to texts of Marx and Heidegger are given to both the translation and the original, with English page numbers preceded by p and German by S.
***
The present work represents the culmination or thirty years of progress toward the author’s intellectual maturity. As such, it is a token of gratitude to all those who have contributed, however unknowingly, to that process. It is, accordingly, dedicated to those magical moments when truth makes its appearance unannounced, but deservedly, within a social gathering.
Part I: Interpreting Marx and Heidegger in Our World
The author thinking about Marx and Heidegger during a visit to East Berlin in 1972.
Chapter I. The Alternative of Marx and Heidegger
T
he reasons for my decision to write on Karl Marx and Martin Heidegger together are numerous. Throughout my study of philosophy, the two major tendencies in continental thought, Marxism and existentialism, have been rivals for my interest. Marx and Heidegger are clearly the founders of the two schools and to my mind they remain the most profound representatives. It was thus natural that I should take the opportunity of researching a dissertation to come to grips with the philosophical alternative they present.
My personal inclination is not, however, merely subjective; it is an expression of the objective conditions in society and in the philosophical tradition. There are, that is, good reasons for someone critical of today’s society to be repelled by the inherent conservatism of Anglo-American philosophy and to be attracted to Marx and Heidegger. Both Marx and Heidegger, for all their criticisms of Hegel, retain the central insight of dialectics: that the facts are not simply given, but are mediated in ways that can only be comprehended with the help of theory. A philosophy that does not take this seriously is ill equipped to deal with deceptive reality.
To turn to Marx or Heidegger as to a dogma is, however, to destroy them. Not only does the originality of their thought demand an intellectual struggle that critically overcomes the habits of common sense, but the weaknesses which have become apparent in their systems necessitate creative development of these systems. Internal requirements of the two philosophies, as well as their deficiencies, call for a confrontation between them, which could serve to clarify and strengthen each of the alternatives, if not to synthesize them. The present introductory chapter and the subsequent review of previous debates between the two positions outline these needs, anticipating the material which follows in the actual interpretations.
A basis for comparison of the two approaches exists in terms of the common search for essences hidden in appearances. The differences between the essential concepts they form and emphasize suggest, then, that Heidegger can be understood as a rethinking of Marx, who too narrowly based his analysis on the economic realm. On the other hand, the lack of historical content in Heidegger’s concepts needs to be remedied through a study of Marx’s method of historically specific concept formation. Although a review of previous attempts at interpreting Marx and Heidegger from each other’s perspective reveals that there has been little success to date in this enterprise, previous misunderstandings can generally be attributed to national and international politics, and it can be hoped that a more fruitful dialogue is now possible.
Chapter I concludes with a summary of the themes and considerations which are raised in Part I and which determine the outlines of the subsequent interpretations of Marx and Heidegger. Chapters II and III expand upon the comparison of Marx and Heidegger by reviewing Heidegger’s critique of Marx and Adorno’s Marxist critique of Heidegger. These chapters thereby uncover internal arguments why Heidegger should have paid more attention to Marx and why Marxists must come to terms with Heidegger’s thought.
Interpretation for Transformation
There is today a need for interpretation of the world. Marx and Heidegger share with Freud the belief that it is possible with the help of a theory to understand someone’s ideas, behavior and self better than he understands them himself. The motivations consciously debated by the agent may well be screens against true perception or at best interpretations of his situation, which are not necessarily privileged over the analysis of his situation by other people. The idealistic presupposition of the transparency of the cogito to the ego has been rejected by these post-Hegelian outlooks. The subject, who has been raised in a family, mediated by social conditions, and thrown
into the world, must interpret his own consciousness, activity, and Being just as an observer must, namely from a perspective which may well be more limited by ignorance of various factors and by being more caught up in self-concealing conditions than an observer with a developed theory – even though the subject has been exposed to more of the empirical facts. This is not a merely scholastic question of epistemology. The self-perception of the subject situated naturally (i.e., without the objectifying alienation of theoretical analysis) in his family, society and world is in fact subject to systematic distortions of which he remains unaware. The normal psychic dynamic of family life is predicated upon its sublimation into the unconscious; the invisible hand of bourgeois exchange society could not be effective without commodity fetishism; and the reliability of the world presupposes that we are fallen
in it and do not recognize its worldhood
or worlding,
its Being.
Both Marx and Heidegger situate Hegel’s dialectic of essence and appearance in the contemporary world. Marx argues that capitalist society is pervaded by a fetishism of commodities,
that is, that the essential social relationships which structure society and the lives of its members appear, if at all, in the illusory form of characteristics of physical objects, of the commodities produced. Any evaluation of capitalist society in terms of its appearances alone, without the assistance of a theory which interprets and demystifies the appearances will necessarily be apologetic – at most liberally reformist – covertly and dogmatically endorsing the mystifying ideology of capitalism. A theoretical interpretation of the essences as illusion, on the other hand, allows for a critical grasp of their contradictory nature and reveals potentials for qualitative transformation.
Similarly, Heidegger argues that Western thought is guilty of a progressive forgetfulness of Being
such that the ontological categories through which we understand reality distort our relationships to ourselves and other beings. What is needed is a meta-ontology, a theory which deals with the deceptive character of contemporary appearances. Thus, common to Marx and Heidegger, but not to the competing philosophic approaches of the twentieth century, is the belief that appearances by themselves are illusory, the insight that this illusory character is historically situated, and the conviction that philosophy’s task is to break through such illusion. This shared conviction provides a basis for the following interpretations of Marx and Heidegger and for their comparison. The central methodological problem for both thinkers is