Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

From $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Chemistry: A novel
Chemistry: A novel
Chemistry: A novel
Ebook195 pages2 hours

Chemistry: A novel

Rating: 4 out of 5 stars

4/5

()

Read preview

About this ebook

PEN/HEMINGWAY AWARD WINNER • WHITING AWARD WINNER • Smart, moving, and funny, a unique coming-of-age story about a quirky, overworked narrator who seems to be on the cusp of a perfect life but finds herself on a new path of discoveries about everything she thought she knew.   

"Told in a hilarious deadpan that recalls Gish Jen and Nora Ephron." —O, The Oprah Magazine

At first glance, the life of the narrator of Weike Wang’s debut novel seems ideal: she is studying for a prestigious PhD in chemistry that will make her Chinese parents proud (or at least satisfied), and her successful, supportive boyfriend has just proposed to her. But instead of feeling hopeful, she is wracked with ambivalence: the long, demanding hours at the lab have created an exquisite pressure cooker, and she doesn’t know how to answer the marriage question. Soon it all becomes too much and her life plan veers off course....
LanguageEnglish
Release dateMay 23, 2017
ISBN9781524731755

Read more from Weike Wang

Related to Chemistry

Related ebooks

Literary Fiction For You

View More

Related categories

Reviews for Chemistry

Rating: 3.7876984126984126 out of 5 stars
4/5

252 ratings30 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    Overall, I was offended and bored by this book. There was humor in the first part, but the second was tedious and not caring of the protagonist who was severely mentally ill. She was barely able to function and possessed little self-awareness. She received very little assistance, and I found the ending very sad.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    In the middle, it can feel rather depressing. The first-person protagonist, who I believe remains unnamed, had horrible parents, can't finish her PhD, and can't commit to the boyfriend who wants to marry her. There's a quote which I'm afraid I didn't bookmark, but which I think I got right: "The optimist believes the glass is half full. The pessimist believes it is half empty. The chemist believes it is full, half with liquid and half with gas, both of which are probably poisonous." That's the protagonist's attitude all the way through.

    You think she must have redeeming qualities which are not on display, this being written in the first person depressive. Because why does Eric stay with her? She sounds relentlessly negative. But he is devoted to her; plus, she has a very warm relationship with "the best friend". This is like the main character of JOAN IS OK - she's an oddball but things don't quite go where you think they're going to. These oddballs aren't total losses. They function and have relationships. They are just human.

    I want to shout out that the author has degrees in chemistry and public health as well as an MFA. Yay for scientists writing books!
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Even the cover of this gentle, funny novel perfectly mirrors our nameless heroine, who is pursuing a PhD in Chemistry until she isn't, due to lack of achievements in her lab. She's a Chinese-American woman who lives with red-headed Eric, another PhD and only child, who has found much more success and has the comfy cushion of an indulgent childhood. Her family is brutally Tiger Mama and Lion Papa-ish, and her fear of telling them that she has had a breakdown that fuels her flunkout is awful. Despite her fear of their disapproval, and Eric leaving her and Boston to take a teaching position in Ohio, she cobbles together a life as a tutor and indulgent dog owner, and uses her best friend, a new mom and MD, as her sounding board and support system. Her responses to the all of life are sympathetic, not pathetic, as she sometimes sees herself. It's truly engaging to see this timid woman evolve into a pillar of self-sufficiency. And the writing is lovely and speckled with insight throughout.

    Quote: "To make such progress as my father has made in one generation, I feel as if I must leave America and colonize the moon."
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    My goodness! This is my life story in a novel (minus the midlife crisis because the narrator achieved it beforehand). Brilliant! I wish I had read this book in 1988 and rewritten my entire adult life!
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Slim first novel. Nice enough, but nothing special.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I loved school. Right up until I hit grad school. Then I couldn't wait to get out. Originally I wanted a PhD. Then I didn't. I still love learning things purely for learning's sake but I don't think I'd want to ever go back to school again and deal with the angst and the politics and all the other nonsense that has nothing to do with learning. It was not a happy place to be for me. And it is not a happy place to be for Weike Wang's unnamed narrator in the novel Chemistry. Then again, nowhere in her life seems particularly happy.

    The narrator of this novel is standing still, afraid to choose a path. She is a PhD student in Chemistry but her project is stalled and she isn't certain she wants to continue. Her boyfriend has proposed but she's put him off, not answering him, thinking always of her own parents' unhappy marriage. She is floundering under the weight of so many expectations--from her parents, from her advisor, from her boyfriend. The only one in her life who doesn't add to her stress and pressure is her dog. Finally quitting school four years into her PhD to tutor others, she can't bring herself to tell her traditional Chinese immigrant parents and let them down. Unable to commit one way or another to her boyfriend, she keeps things open, staying behind when he moves from Boston to a school in Ohio for a job. But stasis is not living and while the narrator needs time and space to find her own path and learn to embrace uncertainty, she will examine herself, her choices, and her wants with the help of a therapist and her doctor friend.

    Told entirely in the first person, the reader still feels somewhat at a remove from the main character. She is quite introspective, jumping from her present to scenes from her parents' lives to her own childhood. She can be dryly witty and the science facts sprinkled throughout the text as asides are appropriate and interesting additions to her thoughts. The writing is spare and choppy and composed in small chunks, like flash pieces knitted together into a whole. The insight into life as a second generation Chinese-American woman is interesting but overall, the main character and her life felt stultifying. The novel as a whole is very slow moving despite its slight length. I wanted to enjoy this a lot more than I did.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This is a very charming, very true story.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Crossroads

    Weike Wang’s anonymous character in her debut novel finds herself at a crossroads, three crossroads, if you’re counting.

    The first concerns her pursuit of a Ph.D in Chemistry. All her life, at the beckoning of her driven and goal focused Chinese parents, both immigrants, she has been educated and pushed rather blatantly into a life in the sciences. Her mother was a pharmacist back in China. She had supported her husband in his pursuit of a Ph.D. When they emigrated to the U.S., the mother was left without her independence, and her relationship with her husband became strained. She made his success possible, and he seems unable to acknowledge this. However, they agree wholeheartedly on a shared objective for their daughter, the narrator: a Ph.D in Chemistry. The daughter follows their wishes, though unhappy, it seems, with every step of the journey, from child to adult. She reaches a crossroads when she realizes she doesn't possess the essential element of success: she’s not an original thinker, she’s simply an extremely accomplished technician, not enough to make the jump to Ph.D status. She decides in frustration to abandon her quest four years into her doctoral program. But she can’t being herself to tell her parents.

    Also, she has a boyfriend, also a chemistry Ph.D student. Unlike her, he is driven by his own confidence and desire to obtain his degree, which he does. They share a very quirky relationship and readers can see that they really care for each other. On the verge of achieving his degree, he asks her to marry him, the opening of the novel, yet another crossroads in her life. Her response is to put off answering, to push it into the distance so often that he finally departs without her to pursue his dream of teaching in a small college. They leave the door open.

    These two relationships and her academic endeavor place stressful demands on her. Please her parents. Fulfill a commitment to her parents. Make a commitment to her boyfriend. She eventually takes up tutoring, which brings her satisfaction. She commiserates with her friend, who is a doctor. She enters therapy. And she and her boyfriend get a dog. It’s with the dog that she has a most interesting and rewarding relationship, because the dog places no demands on her. She’s not forced to make any decisions by the dog, and she’s able to slow down life to wax philosophical on what she herself might want for herself.

    In little more than two hundred pages, in short sentences and slim paragraphs, with scientific principles interspersed impelling thoughts about her life, her parents’ lives, her relationship with the boyfriend, her contrasting of her upbringing (difficult) with the boyfriend’s (idyllic), she tries to wrangle her indecisiveness into a decision, and reaches something resembling one in the end.

    For many who have been where the author finds herself, this novel will ring with much truth. For everybody else, they’ll find lots of insight, perhaps into their friends with loads of ability but little direction, as well a delightful and charming humor.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    This was brilliant. As the protagonist opened up, the book opens up. The metaphors of science are great -- I loved all the scientific facts just as facts, really. The voice is so strong. I hope her next book is just as good.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    4.5 The writing is delightful. The main character's voice is so distinctive and though she is going thru angst, there is humor and sweet moments. Never named, she is a grad student in chemistry, along with her boyfriend Eric. He is having great success in the field, she is not, and while she has a pure love for the science, she is feeling immense pressure from her parents, her faculty advisor and her prestigious Boston university. When she quits, she has to re-examine her identity and face some things about herself that she has left un-examined. Eric has proposed to her, but even that seems like something she cannot commit to right now. Her own parents flawed marriage, her cultural Chinese background and family dynamics, her own successes that don't measure up against the superstars in her program all send her into a spiral of depression and uncertainty, but she emerges with some help from "the best friend", who has troubles of her own, "the shrink" who is a mandated requirement when she drops out of her PhD program, and her own willingness to be vulnerable provide resolution in unexpected ways. This is peppered with science-y facts that have metaphorical meaning in her situation and her relationship with students she tutors gives her a connection with humanity. The fact that it was filed as a "romance" at my library gave me more upbeat expectations that weren't disappointed.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    ***December 1 2018: this book is on sale for $2.99**


    This book is about identity and discovery. It is about relationships. It is simple, broken down by elements, the mundane and notable. It is told through chemistry with all characters unnamed but one.

    I wasn't sure at first. I don't usually connect to this writing style. It is sparse, but it fits this book so well one I got into it I can't imagine it another way.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    How completely heartbreaking this was! The backdrop is of an enormously successful graduate student that experiences the setbacks that life tends to dole out especially to people in their 20s. She suddenly has to find a way to power through losing most of what passed for stability in her life, and tutoring undergrads becomes de facto therapy. I truly hope she writes prolifically in the future, because this was a major achievement for a debut novel. Like my number 1 non-fiction pick for 2018 ("Educated: A Memoir" by Tara Westover), this is instantly in my all-time favorites list as well.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This book was such an enjoyable read. Following a protagonist who in short order quits a PhD program and puts her relationship on the rocks, it is a compelling narrative wrapped in compelling text.

    One thing I liked the most about this was that the book trusted the reader to make a lot of leaps, to bop around in the protagonist's head and to shift rapidly from chemistry to her family to her love life to her relationship with her best friend and back around again. It doesn't bulk out with unnecessary narration and never feels overly pedantic. At least, as a non-chemist.

    Although I don't think this book answers any of the big questions it asks, it is a nice little way of reminding all of us that there's no correct path to take, and that our personal motivations are often so complex that trying to unwind or explain them seems impossible.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    The unnamed protagonist of this short novel is a graduate student in chemistry who is struggling with, or perhaps avoiding, a number of problems: her growing dissatisfaction with life in the lab, intense pressure to succeed from her demanding Chinese-American parents, the difficult legacy of those parents' dysfunctional marriage, and a deep-seated terror of saying yes to any of her fiancé's many marriage proposals.

    This is all told not so much as a story, but as a slightly disjointed internal monologue, a technique that works really well because the character's internal voice is readable and interesting, with some appealing touches of dry humor. I was particularly pleased by it because it's really very rare that a literary author even tries, much less succeeds, at getting inside the head of a science-y kind of person. Ian McEwan does it superbly, but I'm hard-pressed to think of another example... except for this. The narrator here is a strange person, a messed-up person, and a person with a very different background from me, but her internal voice somehow felt instantly recognizable to former-physics major me. It felt very right.

    The structure of the novel did throw me just a little at first, only because it uses present tense consistently whether the narrator is thinking about events in her present or things that happened far in the past. This was a bit confusing for a while, or at least it took some getting used to, but eventually I almost stopped even noticing it. And an interesting thought occurred to me about this narrative mechanism about fifty pages in, when the protagonist is contemplating the degree to which she thinks in Chinese vs in English. I don't speak any form of Chinese, but I have been told that it lacks a grammatical marking for past tense, instead relying on context to pin down when a particular event happened (or happens, or is happening). Which is exactly what the prose here is doing in English. And I rather like that thought. It makes something that at first looks like a simple stylistic quirk feel instead like an expression of character.

    Anyway, I enjoyed this one. My only regret is picking it up when I was kind of busy and had to keep putting it down, because it feels like it would work best if read almost straight through, something that should not be too difficult if you've got a couple of hours to spare.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Quick read

    Chemistry was great for me. I'm a fourth year PhD student in chemical engineering, recently engaged, and constantly wondering what's next. Although I know I'm in the right place, every PhD student faces the difficult choice of continuing or leaving. I loved the main character's voice and journey because I felt it was so relatable. The way she refers to everybody in her life without a name is accurate, as many people do not know "the best friend" or "the student." Overall, I think it was a great book about self-discovery and the fact that it centered around topics I can easily relate to was exciting for me.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    Didn't like this book at all. Whiny main character. No plot, very little dialog. Told in the first person by someone who seemed to understand very little about herself, her culture, the world around her, or other people. Supposedly she grew or learned something as the book progressed (or so a reviewer said). I didn't see it. Two things I liked about the book -- the blobs of amusing or interesting science it had in it and that it was short. It had the usual modern literary ending of no resolution. The curtain just drops. Maybe the author's computer broke down.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    A delightful stream of consciousness meditation on being all things. Why do we understand when proportions or conditions change in chemistry that it will change the nature of the compound, but when things change for a human being, through love, or marriage, or child birth, or moving from China to America we expect the being to continue to do all the things they did before without essential change? It makes no sense. Everything changes when anything changes. Everything can't be sustained - incompatible goals can't be made compatible.

    There is a great deal here too about one's relationship to their Asian parents. (There is a fascinating aside about Asian cooks on competitive cooking shows and what it tells you about having Asian parents that is so real and right - its kind of perfect.) What do children owe their parents just by virtue of being their child. Even if they are terrible parents. How does that vary for Americans and Chinese people? How is that relationship negotiated when you are both American and Chinese?

    The book is fascinating, and also very funny, smart, and insightful. The best debut I have read in a long time.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    In Weike Wang's debut novel, the unnamed narrator recounts events that were set off by her abandonment of her chemistry doctorate. Working at an unnamed prominent university in Boston, the narrator buckles under pressure and retreats. As she thinks back over her childhood, raised by parents unhappy with each other, and as an immigrant to the US who always felt like an outsider, she is a woman who is not quite at home anywhere. Her difficulties extend to her boyfriend, an fairly uncomplicated white guy who loves her, even as he plans to go on with his life, accepting a faculty position in another state.

    This is a hard book to describe. it's a slender book, told in brief segments of memory and experience, all from the narrator's perspective. The book deals with everything from the pressures of competing and performing at an elite university, to the experiences of someone who immigrated to the US as a child, to how childhood is experienced by someone whose parents are unhappily married. And the book is charming; the narrator's viewpoint is a unique and fascinating one and her relationship with her dog and how she relates to her best friend's baby lend a lightness to what might otherwise be heavy-going. She's a mess, but it's easy to see why the people around her are drawn to her.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    4.5. Loved the narrator's voice, can't wait for more from the author. I feel like I need to send this to several of my science-friends. Was super unprepared for the ending, it seemed abrupt, but I can see how that might have been the point.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    The unnamed narrator of this story is having a difficult time finding the right chemistry. She can not find it with her boyfriend who repeatedly proposes to her, her parents who push her into a career similar to their own, nor completing the final phases of her Phd. She's stuck and can not move forward. The author relates the young ladies difficulties with humor and an easiness that is quiet likable and when chemistry does exist it's quite nice. I found the tidbits of science scattered throughout the story quiet interesting. Yet, the story seems to fall flat and the conclusion is befuddling.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    In Weike Wang's novel Chemistry, the nameless female narrator refers to herself as a "an excellent sheep" because she is good at following scientific protocol in the laboratory but can't seem to finish her PhD dissertation, which requires her to contribute original thinking to her field. The pressure leads her to a nervous breakdown, but also to reevaluating her relationships with her Chinese immigrant "tiger parents" and her more successful American boyfriend. Finally she learns about going after what she wants, rather than what others want for her. A short but intense, insightful, and sometimes even humorous read.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I'm so glad I tried this on audio! I had a physical copy a few months ago and the flow of the language wasn't working for me, but I decided to try it as a audiobook and loved it. The narrator's distinct voice and relatable struggles as she navigates her work, love, and parental relationships makes this novel stand out in a crowd of similar concepts. Definitely worth the read!
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Delightful---and so full of humorous details as well as some scientific education along the way. The life of this Chinese-American chemistry student and what happens to her in her pursuit for an answer to what she really should be doing with her life is given a view from all directions---her "best friend," her shrink, Erik, her parents, and on and on---but she needs to answer it for herself.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This is a short novel told in the present tense by a narrator who tells us a great deal about herself even though we never learn her name. She is a Chinese-American Ph.D. student in chemistry, with a boyfriend a year ahead of her named Eric. Eric wants them to get married, but she doesn’t really know how to love, and in any event she thinks marriages are doomed to fail, based on her limited knowledge of her own family. Her parents are cold, judgmental, and emotionally abusive (although she still feels very tied to them and their expectations for her). She never saw them affectionate with each other either; rather, it seemed like there was only hate between them, punctuated by violent rages. While they pushed her intellectually, she got no modeling or support whatsoever for handling any uncertainty or for experiencing a loving relationship. To say she is not in touch with her emotions is an understatement. She deals with any uncomfortable feelings or thoughts by lashing out in anger or retreating into science.

    The narrator has a nervous breakdown and drops out of school. (Her mother says, “Don’t call me again. Don’t even think about coming home. You are nothing to me without that degree.” ) She acknowledges feeling fear and guilt about the reaction of her parents: “I can’t stand it when they are mad at me. I can’t sleep, and once I can’t sleep, I can’t do much of anything else.”

    Eric doesn’t understand the power her parents have over her, but as the narrator maintains in frustration, he could never understand what it means to have parents whose ties to you are so warped. You need whatever they give you, even if it is cruel and unhealthy. Eric observed that she protects herself with a metaphorical barrier of ten-inch-thick bulletproof glass, and behind this glass, he noted, there is more glass. He also felt like she carried a ball of barbed wire close to her chest that she sometimes threw at other people. After her breakdown, when she became increasingly self-destructive, he insisted she go see a therapist. In spite of everything, Eric is patient and supportive, and wants to help her. It only makes her upset. Why is he so nice? Why is his family so nice? Why is he like he is and she cannot be like that? She doesn’t want her heart locked up, but there it is.

    Then Eric accepts a job at Oberlin, and the narrator stays back in Boston, where she struggles to regenerate herself and to let her heart out of its sealed container. But is it too late? There is a possibility that the wall she is built around her emotions is like the Great Wall of China, which is so durable it has lasted since as early as the 7th century BCE, and so large it can be seen from the moon.

    Evaluation: This book is well-written, with a number of metaphorical themes suggested by the title cleverly reflected by the plot. But the main character is so cooly analytical and unemotional that it was hard for me to warm up to her or even to feel her pain. I wasn’t especially taken by the way it ended either. But I must say this book has gotten rave reviews by others.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Amazing and hilarious book, and this coming from a current chem graduate student. 5 stars.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Reminiscent of Jenny Offill's Department of Speculation, in a great way. I loved the quiet but wry voice that leaves a lot unsaid, letting you unravel the mysteries of a relationship even as you get to know one of its voices really well. Wang has a great help on her narrative voice, and it comes off the page so clearly that when you look up, it seems strange to find yourself in the same old room as before.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    "You must love chemistry even when it is not working. You must love chemistry unconditionally."

    "The optimist sees the glass half full. The pessimist sees the glass half empty. The chemist sees the glass completely full, half in liquid state and half gaseous, both of which are probably poisonous."

    Our unnamed narrator is deep into her PhD chemistry program, at a Boston university and now is weighing a marriage proposal from her live-in boyfriend, a fellow scientist. It seems like her life as been guided by outside forces, her entire life, especially by her domineering Chinese-immigrant parents. She is slowly being suffocated by these crushing expectations. To everyone's horror, she decides to chuck it all and go her own way...
    This is a well-crafted debut, with clean, sharp prose and whip-smart observations. It is also filled with scientific and historic anecdotes, that I also enjoyed, including this gem, calling out to The Radium Girls:

    “Chemistry, while powerful, is sometimes unpredictable. In 1902, radium's glow is mistaken for spontaneous energy and Marie (Curie) is celebrated. But then, in 1928, the lip-pointing girls, the going straight to your bones.”
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I can see people not enjoying this b/c of the writing style (I myself had trouble getting into it); however I think it ends up working quite well for the story. I found the main character incredibly relatable.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    A book I basically read in one sitting because I couldn't put it down. Yes, all unhappy families are different - and I get the narrator - I don't think it possible for someone from an unhappy family to settle down with someone from a happy one - they will never understand where you have come from.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Fascinating-- not at all what I expected, but good.

    From the publisher:
    Three years into her graduate studies at a demanding Boston university, the unnamed narrator of this nimbly wry, concise debut finds her one-time love for chemistry is more hypothesis than reality. She's tormented by her failed research--and reminded of her delays by her peers, her advisor, and most of all by her Chinese parents, who have always expected nothing short of excellence from her throughout her life. But there's another, nonscientific question looming: the marriage proposal from her devoted boyfriend, a fellow scientist, whose path through academia has been relatively free of obstacles, and with whom she can't make a life before finding success on her own.

    Eventually, the pressure mounts so high that she must leave everything she thought she knew about her future, and herself, behind. And for the first time, she's confronted with a question she won't find the answer to in a textbook: What do I really want? Over the next two years, this winningly flawed, disarmingly insightful heroine learns the formulas and equations for a different kind of chemistry--one in which the reactions can't be quantified, measured, and analyzed; one that can be studied only in the mysterious language of the heart. Taking us deep inside her scattered, searching mind, here is a brilliant new literary voice that astutely juxtaposes the elegance of science, the anxieties of finding a place in the world, and the sacrifices made for love and family.

Book preview

Chemistry - Weike Wang

Book cover image

THIS IS A BORZOI BOOK PUBLISHED BY ALFRED A. KNOPF

Copyright © 2017 by Weike Wang

All rights reserved. Published in the United States by Alfred A. Knopf, a division of Penguin Random House LLC, New York, and distributed in Canada by Random House of Canada, a division of Penguin Random House Canada Limited, Toronto.

www.aaknopf.com

Grateful acknowledgment is made to Hal Leonard LLC for permission to reprint a lyric excerpt from Don’t Stop Me Now, words and music by Freddie Mercury. Copyright © 1978 by Queen Music Ltd. All rights administered by Sony/ATV Music Publishing LLC. International copyright secured. All rights reserved. Reprinted by permission of Hal Leonard LLC.

Knopf, Borzoi Books, and the colophon are registered trademarks of Penguin Random House LLC.

A portion of this work orginally appeared, in different form, in Ploughshares (Summer 2016).

This is a work of fiction. Names, characters, places, and incidents either are the product of the author’s imagination or are used fictitiously. Any resemblance to actual persons, living or dead, events, or locales is entirely coincidental.

LCCN: 2016038012

ISBN 9781524731748 (hardcover)

ISBN 9781524731755 (ebook)

Cover design by Janet Hansen

ep_rh_4.1_148359083_c0_r3

Contents

Cover

Title Page

Copyright

Epigraph

Part I

Part II

Acknowledgments

A Note About the Author

Reading Group Guide

Epigraph (mathematics, noun): the set of all points lying on or above a function’s graph

Part I

The boy asks the girl a question. It is a question of marriage. Ask me again tomorrow, she says, and he says, That’s not how this works.

Diamond is no longer the hardest mineral known to man. New Scientist reports that lonsdaleite is. Lonsdaleite is 58 percent harder than diamond and forms only when meteorites smash themselves into Earth.

···

The lab mate says to make a list of pros and cons.

Write it all down, prove it to yourself.

She then nods sympathetically and pats me on the arm.

The lab mate is a solver of hard problems. Her desk is next to mine but is neater and more result-producing.

Big deal, she says of her many, many publications and doesn’t take herself too seriously, is busy but not that busy, talks about things other than chemistry.

I find her outlook refreshing, yet strange. If I were that accomplished, I would casually bring up my published papers in conversation. Have you read so-and-so? Because it is quite worth your time. The tables alone are beautiful and well formatted.

I have only one paper out. The tables are in fact very beautiful, all clear and double-spaced line borders. All succinct and informative titles.

Somewhere I read that the average number of readers for a scientific paper is 0.6.

·

So I make the list. The pros are extensive.

Eric cooks dinner. Eric cooks great dinners. Eric hands me the toothbrush with toothpaste on it and sometimes even sticks it in my mouth. Eric takes out the trash, the recycling; waters all our plants because I can’t seem to remember that they’re living things. These leaves feel crunchy, he said after the week that he was gone.

He goes that week to California for a conference with other young and established chemists.

Also Eric drives me to lab when it’s too rainy to bike. Boston sees a great deal of rain. Sometimes the rain comes down horizontal and hits the face.

Also Eric walks the dog. We have a dog. Eric got him for me.

I realize that I don’t have any cons. I knew this going in.

It is a half-list, I tell the lab mate the next day, and she offers to buy me a cookie.

·

In lab, there are two boxes filled with argon. It is where I do highly sensitive chemistry, the kind that can never see air. Once air is let in, the chemicals catch fire. It is also where I wish to put my head on days of nothing going right.

On those days, I add the wrong amount of catalyst. Or I add the wrong catalyst.

Catalysts make reactions go faster. They lower activation energy, which is the indecision each reaction faces before committing to its path.

What use is this work in the long run? I ask myself in the room when I am alone. The solvent room officially, but I have renamed it the Fortress of Solitude.

Eric is no longer in this lab. He graduated last year and is now in another lab. A chemistry PhD takes at least five years to complete. We met when I was in my first and he was in his second.

Now I walk around our apartment and trip over his stuff: big black drum bags and steel pots and carboys with brown liquid fermenting inside. Eric plays the drums and brews beer. One con is how much space these two hobbies take up, but this is outweighed by the drums that I like to hear and the beer that I like to drink.

My pro list grows at an exponential rate.

···

We had talked about marriage before. Can you see yourself settling down, having kids? Can you see yourself starting a family? I didn’t say no, but I didn’t say yes. We had these talks casually. Each time, he thought if actually proposed to, I would say something different.

·

At least now all my cards are on the table, he says. But please don’t take too long to decide.

···

It has been the summer of unbearable heat. At the Home Depot, we go up and down aisles looking for a fan. Our last fan broke yesterday and next week it is supposed to be hotter. Then next month, a hurricane.

When Eric sees the hurricane report, he wonders if the people who wrote it are just screwing with us.

Why would they do that? I ask.

Because it’s funny.

Oh, right. Then a minute later, I laugh.

Patience is Eric’s greatest virtue. He will wait in longer lines than I will and think nothing of it. He will smile, while holding a heavy fan, at the older woman in front of him who has brought a tall stack of lampshades and at the moment of payment is having second thoughts. She asks the clerk for his opinion. She asks Eric. Do I need the magenta? Me, she doesn’t bother with, because I am the one with the furiously tapping foot. The woman considers some more, turning each lampshade in her hands, but in the end purchases nothing.

I tell Eric in the car that if I were to reimagine Hell, it would be no different from the line we were just in. Except the woman would never decide on a lampshade and the line would never move.

Can you imagine? I say. A worse punishment than pushing that thing up the hill.

A boulder, Eric says.

I realize what a hypocrite I’m being, to make him wait for an answer and then dwell on a twenty-five-minute line.

Once home, Eric sets the fan up and the dog goes crazy.

···

Two years ago, Eric and I moved in together. We do not have a dog but we are thinking about it. What kind? Eric asks. Big? Small? I don’t have a preference. How about just adorable?

When he first brings him home, I hear the tail, long and bushy, thumping against the couch. A forty-five-pound goldendoodle. Incredibly adorable. When he runs, his ears flop. If we never groomed him, his hair would keep growing and he would look like a blond bear.

The blond bear loves people and this is good. But then we discover that he is afraid of everything else: the hair dryer, an empty box, the fan.

···

Bad tempers run in my family. It is the dominant allele, like black hair. Eric has red hair. Our friends have asked if there is any way our babies will turn out to be gingers. Gingers are dying out, and our friends are concerned about Eric’s beautiful locks.

I say, Unless Mendel was completely wrong about genetics, our babies will have my hair.

But our friends can still dream. An Asian baby with red hair. One friend says, You could write a Science paper on that and then apply for academic jobs and then get tenure.

Eric is already looking for academic jobs. He wants to teach at a college that primarily serves undergrads.

Because they are the future, he says. Eager to learn, energetic, and happy, more or less, as compared with grad students. With undergrads, I can make a real difference.

I don’t say this but I think it: You are the only person I know who talks like that. So enthusiastically and benefit-of-the-doubt-giving.

But the colleges he’s interested in are not in Boston. They are in places like Oberlin, Ohio.

I am certain that Eric will get the job. His career path is very straight, like that of an arrow to its target. If I were to draw my path out, it would look like a gas particle flying around in space.

The lab mate often echoes the wisdom of many chemists before her. You must love chemistry even when it is not working. You must love chemistry unconditionally.

·

The friends who ask about the red-haired babies are the ones recently married or the ones recently married with a dog. Whenever we have them over for dinner, like tonight, they think we are trying to tell them that we are engaged.

News? they say.

Not yet, I reply, but here, have some freshly grated Parmesan cheese instead.

Behind my back, I know they are less kind. They ask each other, It’s been four years, hasn’t it? They joke, She is only with him for his money.

It is common knowledge now that graduate students make close to nothing and that there are more PhD scientists in this country than there are jobs for them.

When Eric first decides to do a PhD, it is in high school. He takes a chemistry class and excels. This is in western Maryland, in a town with many steepled churches but no Starbucks. Every other year we drive three hours from the DC airport, through a gap in the Appalachian Mountains, and arrive at a picturesque place where Eric seems to know everyone. He waves to the man across the horseshoe bar, his former band teacher. He waves to the woman at the post office, the mother of a high school friend. The diner with the horseshoe bar is called Niners. There is always farmland for sale and working mills.

Sometimes I wonder why he left a place where every ice-cream shop is called a creamery to work seventy-hour weeks in lab. He credits the chemistry teacher, who asked him often, What are you going to do afterward? And don’t just say stick around.

···

A belief among Chinese mothers is that children pick their own traits in the womb. The smart ones work diligently to pick the better traits. The dumb ones get easily flustered and fall asleep. For their laziness, they are then dealt the worse traits.

Or perhaps this is just a belief of my own mother.

Had you chosen better, you would have not ended up with your father’s terrible temper or my poor vision.

I don’t want to believe this but it has become so ingrained. Compared with mine, Eric’s temper is nonexistent.

Thursday, trash day. We pick the wrong streets to go down and drive for miles behind a garbage truck. It is a one-way road. It is also a one-lane road. But not once does he sigh or complain. He puts on jazz music instead. Listen to this, he says. But all I hear is the going and stopping of the truck, the picking up and dumping of trash, the clanking of metal bins. So frustrated am I after one song that I lean over and press the horn for him. Then out the window, I shout at the truck, Excuse me, do you mind?

···

The PhD advisor visits my desk, sits down, brings his hands together, and asks, Where do you see your project going in five years?

Five years? I say in disbelief. I would hope to be graduated by then and in the real world with a job.

I see, he says. Perhaps then it is time to start a new project, one that is more within your capabilities.

He leaves me to it.

The desire to throw something at his head never goes away. Depending on what he says, it is either the computer or the desk.

I sketch out possible projects. Alchemy, for one. If I could achieve that today, I could graduate tomorrow.

A guy in lab strongly believes that women do not belong in science. He’s said that women lack the balls to actually do science.

Which isn’t wrong. We do lack balls.

But if he had said that to me at the start of grad school, I would have punched him. Coming in, I think myself the best at chemistry. In high school, I win a national award for it. I say, cockily, at orientation, Yes, that was me, only to realize that everyone else had won it as well, at some point, in addition to awards I have never won.

The lab guy is still around. He works with the lab mate. If all goes well, they will have another paper next year and then they will graduate.

Women lack the balls to do science, he still says. With the exception of your lab mate. She has three.

Later I ask Eric, How many balls do you think I have?

It is poor timing. We have just gotten into bed and started to kiss.

Uh, none? he says, and the kissing is over. I was hoping he would have said something along

Enjoying the preview?
Page 1 of 1