Lessons in Chemistry: A Novel
4/5
()
About this ebook
This novel is “irresistible, satisfying and full of fuel” (The New York Times Book Review) and “witty, sometimes hilarious...the Catch-22 of early feminism” (Stephen King, via Twitter).
A BEST BOOK OF THE YEAR: The New York Times, Washington Post, NPR, Oprah Daily, Entertainment Weekly, Newsweek
Chemist Elizabeth Zott is not your average woman. In fact, Elizabeth Zott would be the first to point out that there is no such thing as an average woman. But it’s the early 1960s and her all-male team at Hastings Research Institute takes a very unscientific view of equality. Except for one: Calvin Evans; the lonely, brilliant, Nobel–prize nominated grudge-holder who falls in love with—of all things—her mind. True chemistry results.
But like science, life is unpredictable. Which is why a few years later Elizabeth Zott finds herself not only a single mother, but the reluctant star of America’s most beloved cooking show Supper at Six. Elizabeth’s unusual approach to cooking (“combine one tablespoon acetic acid with a pinch of sodium chloride”) proves revolutionary. But as her following grows, not everyone is happy. Because as it turns out, Elizabeth Zott isn’t just teaching women to cook. She’s daring them to change the status quo.
Laugh-out-loud funny, shrewdly observant, and studded with a dazzling cast of supporting characters, Lessons in Chemistry is as original and vibrant as its protagonist.
Related to Lessons in Chemistry
Related ebooks
The Ministry of Time: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Expiration Dates: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Weyward: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Christie Affair: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Alienation of Courtney Hoffman: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Other Birds: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Odder: The Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Immortality: A Love Story Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Extremely Loud And Incredibly Close: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Paradise Problem Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Powerful: A Powerless Story Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Olga Dies Dreaming: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Age of Magical Overthinking: Notes on Modern Irrationality Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Beautiful World, Where Are You: A Novel Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5In the Lives of Puppets Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Villa: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Kristin Hannah’s The Nightingale Summary Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAnimal Farm Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEveryone in My Family Has Killed Someone: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Finlay Donovan Jumps the Gun: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Hell Bent: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Things They Carried Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Swift River: A Read with Jenna Pick Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Hello Girls Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Reckless Girls: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Divine Rivals: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5We Used to Live Here: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Feminist Fiction For You
I Who Have Never Known Men Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Certain Hunger Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ariel: The Restored Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Stories from Suffragette City Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas: A Story Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5They Never Learn Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Breasts and Eggs: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Bell Jar: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Stone Blind: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ripe: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Butcher's Daughter: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Any Man: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Memory Keeper of Kyiv: A powerful, important historical novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Clytemnestra: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Woman Is No Man: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5When We Were Vikings Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Animal: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Reluctant Immortals Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Visitors Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Hitting a Straight Lick with a Crooked Stick: Stories from the Harlem Renaissance Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5I Am Lilith: An epic reimagining of the story of Lilith Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Match Me If You Can: An utterly hilarious, will-they-won't-they? romantic comedy from Sandy Barker Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Lioness of Boston: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Monstrous Regiment Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Violets Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5On a Woman's Madness Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Wind's Twelve Quarters: Stories Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5When Women Were Dragons: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5What Should Be Wild: A Novel Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Heartbreak for Hire: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related categories
Reviews for Lessons in Chemistry
1,907 ratings161 reviews
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Unexpected. Reminded me of John Irving.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Whoever set up the cover art and marketing for this book, I don't think it really sells the story to the right audience.
This is somewhat humorous, albeit in the frustrating, "they did what?" "she replied what??" kind of way. It is the story of a woman, and she does have some romance with a man, but this is more a story of struggles, assumptions, possibly neurodivergence, and how to navigate all of that while being a woman in the 1950s and 1960s.
I don't really want to give away anything else, but knowing that should give a much better idea of what this book is, and what it's not. - Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5This book was such a disappointment.
I don't understand all the hype and 5-star reviews everywhere.
I feel like the people who loved it must have read a different book. - Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Took me a while but loved the last 1/3
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5This historical fiction contained everything a memorable novel should include. Solid characters, romance, villains and heroes, focused plot.
The novel is set in the early 1960’s when women were diminished and spoken down to but chemist Elizabeth Zott, an outspoken women who is true to herself, stands up to sexual misconduct and harassment by professors and fellow coworkers.
The reader roots for Ms. Zott all the way. - Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5simplistic. plucky heroine overcomes odds... feminism for the oprah crowd
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5So beautifully written. I love the story arcs, and together with the characters, they weave together such a beautiful story.
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5This would make a good book group book for those who really like to discuss things even when they disagree - lots of topics to explore if you're willing to hear everyone's take. It seems to bring out a love-it or hate-it (or a mix of both!) reaction in readers. I personally am not a fan of this book, but the conversations I've had and overhead about it are fascinating. Thank you, Bonnie Garmus - a winner of a debut because it is absolutely getting talked about!
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5A fun easy read but I didn't relate to the main character. I am a scientist and I was a rower and I did not get the feeling that she understood either scientists or rowers. And even with that major flaw it was still a fun read.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5This is somewhere between a 3 and a 4 for me--and I went back and forth on how to rate it. At the beginning I was underwhelmed, but the story grew on me as I listened to it. It's set in the 1960s I believe--at a time when women scientists were few and women in most workplaces dealt with sexual harassment. What I liked: *Elizabeth Zott--a female in chemistry at a time when there were probably few women chemists in the United States *That Elizabeth didn't dumb down her cooking show for the female audience but believed that they could understand complex chemical concepts--and for encouraging women to follow their dreams even if their skill set fell outside what the norms for women at the time were. *SixThirty (the dog). I just fell in love with him from the time he was introduced. What I didn't like: *Much as I do feel Calvin and Elizabeth were soulmates--I didn't like that they never got married (Elizabeth seemed opposed to marriage)--and I didn't like that they were intimate outside of marriage. We don't really know if Elizabeth's pregnancy would have changed their relationship status. *Sexist attitudes: Elizabeth's professor, Elizabeth's boss at Hastings, Mrs. Mudford Etc.
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5So many people claimed that Lessons in Chemistry by Bonnie Garmus ranked as an exceptional novel. Yes, the book provides questions and answers concerning females in the workforce, but the abundance of chemistry terms in the book repelled me. The story centers on Elizabeth Zott and her quest to promote her skills in chemistry, but her male co-workers and boss all take credit for Elizabeth accomplishments. Then, a glimmer of hope at the end of the rainbow, as Elizabeth becomes a renown television cooking hostess utilizing her chemistry skills. Supporting characters, such as Harriet Sloane, Six-Thirty, Wakely, and Calvin Evans ease the story in support of quirky Elizabeth. And last, but not least, shines the highly intelligent Madeline, the daughter of Elizabeth. A story filled with hope, but, again, too much chemistry.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5I am slightly conflicted over Lessons in Chemistry by Bonnie Garmus. There were some aspects of the book that I loved, while there were others that I definitely didn’t. This debut novel tells the story of Elizabeth Zott, who becomes a celebrated cooking show host in 1960s Southern California. Although she considers herself to be a scientist who specializes in chemistry, the world at that time liked to place women in the role of housewives and mothers.
I had some difficulty warming to Elizabeth as I found her to be too obtuse and stubborn in how she presented herself and perhaps too exceptional to be relatable. In her constant bid to use the power of science to bring about changes she had the tendency to plow over everyone. The story became quite repetitive and I was constantly hoping to see the discrimination and sexual abuse addressed a little more seriously than it was.
On the other hand, Lessons in Chemistry is very witty and intelligent. It paints an interesting picture of the early days of affirmative action when societal norms desperately needed an overhaul. The author also wisely supplies some very endearing secondary characters like Calvin, Harriet, Madeline and especially the lovable dog, Six-Thirty. So mixed reaction but overall an absorbing and interesting read. - Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5This was the recommended book for our book club. I read it in a couple of days and more than once wanted to throw it across the room. Be warned there is an assault at the beginning of the book and I almost stopped reading right then but I knew it set the tone for the ugliness Elizabeth encountered and how it formed her personality. Thankfully there are some funny scenes right afterwards. Some of it made me angry about how many woman were treated in the 1950's and 1960's when it came to forging their own path in the fields that were dominated by men. Notice I didn’t say all women, because my mother as a single mother raising 2 children became the top sales person in an all male business. But I’m not minimizing the fight for equality; it is real and still ongoing. I did like the bizarreness of Elizabeth Zott, the way she was singularly focused. Loved the dog, the child and was fascinated by Calvin and his mysterious childhood. I didn’t like the underlying theme of all religious are the bad guys or are misguided in their beliefs. I’ll have to wait to see what the book club thought, because that should be a interesting discussion.
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5I read this because it was a previous WCBC read and I had heard good things mostly. I have to say that I did not totally like it but in the end it was a good story where all ends well. It isn't so much about Chemistry as it is about women's issues in the 50s/60s.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Lessons in Chemistry by Bonnie Garmus
Historical (late 1950 to mid 1960’s) fiction. Chick lit. Trigger warnings: rape scene.
Elizabeth Zott is a chemist working at Hasting Research Institute. It’s the early 1960’s and she gets very little respect or equality in trying to do her job. Calvin Evans is the exception. Their first couple of meetings didn’t go so well, being two dedicate and single minded scientists. Eventually they figure out they have feelings for each other begin a relationship. Life intervenes and Elizabeth finds herself the host of a cooking show because cooking after all is just chemistry.
Heartbreaking inequality as Elizabeth is forced to adapt to make a living wage and support her family. It’s sad and yet incredibly empowering as well. My thanks to everyone that fought the battles so that I can now earn the same salary as a male counterpart. And believe me, for the first half of my working life, that was not always the case. But back to the story, Elizabeth is strong and not afraid to speak up for herself and demand the respect of her job. She surprises her bosses over and over again with her views and her outright success. My two favorite characters were Mad and Six-thirty because of their intelligence and absolute love of Elizabeth.
A poignant story that includes a couple of hateful scenes but is also full of love and empowerment. - Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5I kept hearing about Bonnie Garmus's Lessons in Chemistry, but it took me a while before I finally got around to finding out what all the talk was about. I decided to listen to the audiobook, and I found Miranda Raison's narration perfect. She brought Elizabeth Zott to life.
Elizabeth Zott will strike a chord with most women. Like it or not, most women have dealt with the same problems she has. What makes this story truly wonderful is that no matter the experiences she must endure, Garmus tells her story with a light touch. She never mines the depths, and the reader is never far away from a smile.
Readers may learn a bit about chemistry, research labs, and television in the early 1960s, but that's merely a byproduct. What I loved about Lessons in Chemistry was the cast of characters surrounding Elizabeth Zott. Calvin, the man who loved who she truly was. Her daughter, Mads. Her neighbor and friend, Harriet, and Walter, her boss at the television station. Oops! I almost forgot her dog, Six Thirty, which is based on the author's dog. The story would not be complete without Six Thirty.
Speaking of the author, there's an author interview at the end of the audiobook which everyone should read after they've read the book. (It contains spoilers.) I think it brought me just as big a smile as Elizabeth and her friends and family did.
If you're in the mood for a feel-good story, here it is. I loved every bit of it. - Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5First off, I loved it. It reminded me very much of the Barbie 2023 film, in that it was Feminism 101, and very funny and ironic. Interesting that this may be a trend now, and I don’t know whether it will be a good thing or not yet.
I texted a younger librarian friend and asked if the Dewey Decimal System had a category for “hysterical fiction.” She said no, but that she could get behind it, even though she didn’t like the book that much. She explained that she didn’t actually realize when the time period of the novel was when she was reading it, because not much has changed. Ooof. I get that. (Personally, I was insulted when the book said "historical fiction" on the cover, and then opened with the chapter entitled, "November 1961.")
But just like the Barbie 2023 film, many people would be understandably disappointed if they dislike such serious subjects being taken so lightly. I think that there may also be an age component involved in liking the book. Those of us who are of a certain age understand that Lessons in Chemistry is pure fantasy. Even if a woman were to be so enlightened in those times, there is no way that she could have been so publicly outspoken about it, let alone be that peculiar package of stunningly beautiful, incredibly intelligent, outspoken and athletic. Period. But many women may have been beginning to have glimpses of feminist thought in the late 1950s, and recognize it when the idealized character Elizabeth Zott speaks those thoughts. On a hunch, I looked up Bonnie Garmus’s age. Yup; she’s about 67 years old. (Wow, kudos to her on her first book.) She’s also of the age in which women turn invisible, and has some perspective now. She would have been about the same age as Zott's daughter is in the novel, and it is touching that Bonnie Garmus dedicated the book to her mother.
There is a lot of sexism depicted in this book that should be the subject of outrage and anger instead of humor. Even the plot of the book itself centers men, and the women simply revolve around them. Okay. For those who are still battling against sexism in their lives every day, I can see why they wouldn’t love this book. But for those women who still have not allowed themselves to see things the way that they really are because of their cultural backgrounds, this approach may be something that they can grasp. For those turned off by the emotions of anger and outrage, and those who need a pretty woman who is a mother and a cook, this book may be as enlightening as it is entertaining. The pink chicklit cover is stealthy, and if it leads more women to questioning whether things have to be the way that they are, then I’m all for it. - Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5I really enjoyed this book and am grateful not to have been born in that time period and be trying to work as a woman scientist.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5I usually don't like "best-sellers" but this one had an interesting story and was thoroughly enjoyable. The female scientist begins in a partnership, and she has a child, then she ends up hosting a cooking show to make ends meet. The fact that she does this show in her own way, emphasizing chemistry, speaks to the need to be yourself regardless of what others think you should be. Always a good lesson.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5I usually don't like "best-sellers" but this one had an interesting story and was thoroughly enjoyable. The female scientist begins in a partnership, and she has a child, then she ends up hosting a cooking show to make ends meet. The fact that she does this show in her own way, emphasizing chemistry, speaks to the need to be yourself regardless of what others think you should be. Always a good lesson.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5I loved the opening sentence of this feminist novel and kept going from there, relishing the free-floating points of view: Elizabeth, chemist-turned-cooking-show-star; her beloved, Calvin; their daughter, Mad; and even their dog, Six Thirty. It became a tiny bit preachy near the end, but I could overlook that because the rest was so tasty. (Thanks to Anita for insisting I read it!)
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5What an interesting story. I actually could not put the book down easily. I wanted to find how what happened. Very creative. I don't read much fiction and I resisted reading this for a long while, even after folks kept on recommending it. The discrimination and work issues were a very much a part of my work life and now my volunteer experiences. We still have a ways to go, ladies and good gentlemen.
- Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5Mine is an alternative review of Garmus' novel: the novel was downright depressing and annoyingly full of skewed lab tropes and excessive descriptions of rape. To explain my difficulty with this narrative, I was influenced largely by the abysmal harassment (sexual and otherwise) and data theft. Sadly, much of my career in science was tainted with similar discriminatory episodes, though not to the extent of rape.
It is a sad truth that these workplace conditions described in the book are still rampant in many women's careers, not just scientific research. Garmus' story of what her MC faced was certainly a trope, which held some truths. Despite the touted improvements of enlightened workplaces and gender equity, the old boys network thrives. Chemistry, maths, computer science, engineering and physics are frequently prone to this discriminatory culture. It is hard to have an unbiased view of this story, especially suffering through reading some poorly described lab practices, as well as a rather unrealistic view of the very bright child. One is left wondering whether the author asked a manuscript reader with a strong scientific background to provide feedback? - Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Clever; a bit cliched; page turner style kept my interest
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Read on audio. A very popular book that was getting all the buzz in the last year, as well as a series on Apple. Set in the late 50's, Elizabeth Zott is a highly intelligent woman, who has to deal with the misogyny of the times. She's expelled from a doctoral program because she was a victim of assault by her advisor, she gets a lab tech job, but when her famous chemist boyfriend passes away, she's fired as being because she's going to be an unwed mother. Through circumstances she becomes a famous host of a cooking show, despite all the push backs of her male superiors. And in the end, because it makes perfect sense ?, she leaves her cooking show to go back triumphantly to her life as a research chemist and all is figuratively right with the world. A very good read.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Bonnie Garmus has written a great book! Fabulous characters, Elizabeth, Harriet, Mad and Six Thirty the dog and Calvin all added to the joy of this story. It portrays perfectly the sexist society of the 50/60's where women's worth was confined to their homemaking ability. Sad in places, funny in others, but ultimately uplifting and inspirational. I couldn't put it down. Loved it!
- Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5I have to confess that I only read 1/3 of the book and then I remembered, mercifully, that I'm no longer in college and I'm under no obligation to finish a book I do not like. "Trite" is the word that comes to mind for the parts of this book that I did read. Nothing made me laugh. Ridiculous characters. Ugh. Giving it two stars because I didn't finish it so maybe it gets better.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Why didn't I hate this book? It has a lot of things I usually come down quite hard on: two dimensional characters, lots of coincidences, a humanized animal. I think that these things bug me when an author does them unintentionally. In this case, Ms. Garmus has chosen to deal with the issue of sexual harassment and sexual assault in the workplace in an unusual style. She writes at a fast pace, with lots of wit and some laugh-out-loud humour. She knows what she's doing, and her plot, characters and style align in a way that works.
I think SixThirty functions as a Green chorus. For some reason, I empathized with his inability to become what others wanted him to be (a bomb detector). Like I said, the author made all the "quirks" in this novel work.
So, go ahead and read this as a light read about a single mom struggling with her career and strange child. There's a lot of humour which makes the book an enjoyable read. But the serious issues are there for those who want to, or can't help but, see them. A "beach read" doesn't leave me wtih much to think about. This book did. - Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Elizabeth Zott is a research chemist and single mother. There is nothing unusual about that status today, but this novel is set in the late 1950s and early 1960s when patriarchal society made it next to impossible for any woman to have a career, and an unmarried woman even more so. But Elizabeth Zott is no ordinary woman, and boldly confronts every challenge set in front of her.
This premise sets up a classic “overcoming adversity” storyline but delivers in an anything-but-classic style. The narrative is fast-paced and witty. Zott is a larger than life character, a sort of superhero. The “baddies” are a bit over the top, but effectively depict the misogyny and gender bias of the time. I was initially put off by the two characters whom Elizabeth is closest to: her daughter and her dog. But I couldn’t help getting swept up in their story, and when I began to see those characters as something akin to magical realism, everything clicked.
While some of the constraints women face in the 1960s have been relaxed, our society is still rife with gender bias. Hopefully readers will both enjoy Zott’s story and reflect on where we’ve come, and how much further we have to go. - Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5My experience reading this book was at times unpleasant since the characters were often caricatures and the events appeared forced, especially when they were opposed to Elizabeth Zott, the main character, a scientist. So, even though the book was very readable and difficult for me to put down, this reduced my enjoyment of it.
The main character of Elizabeth, however, really pulls this book together. Elizabeth is not only intelligent, but also incredibly rational, pragmatic, and level-headed; she just won't accept being underestimated. She continues to defy the restrictions that some (sometimes it seems like everyone) would place on her due to her sex, telling her audience that "the reduction of women to something less than men...is not biological; it's cultural." Not so much because she defies these boundaries but because she recognizes their absurdity and acts appropriately, which made me fall in love with her. It is the absurdity of some situations that provides a level of comic relief in what is often a very dark story.
The novel's opening chapters, which seem almost like they were written for a young adult readership, highlight the author's straightforward writing style. Although the approach becomes less obvious as the story goes on, some readers might become disinterested before the action truly picks up. The characters that surround Elizabeth also lack complexity; for the most part, the "good" ones are all very wise and helpful, while the evil characters are naive and malicious; I thought this distracted from the message of the book. Lastly, a lot of the storyline, especially the fairytale conclusion, is highly dependent on coincidence. These aspects detracted from what I otherwise found to be a pleasant read.
Book preview
Lessons in Chemistry - Bonnie Garmus
Chapter 1
November 1961
Back in 1961, when women wore shirtwaist dresses and joined garden clubs and drove legions of children around in seatbeltless cars without giving it a second thought; back before anyone knew there’d even be a sixties movement, much less one that its participants would spend the next sixty years chronicling; back when the big wars were over and the secret wars had just begun and people were starting to think fresh and believe everything was possible, the thirty-year-old mother of Madeline Zott rose before dawn every morning and felt certain of just one thing: her life was over.
Despite that certainty, she made her way to the lab to pack her daughter’s lunch.
Fuel for learning, Elizabeth Zott wrote on a small slip of paper before tucking it into her daughter’s lunch box. Then she paused, her pencil in midair, as if reconsidering. Play sports at recess but do not automatically let the boys win, she wrote on another slip. Then she paused again, tapping her pencil against the table. It is not your imagination, she wrote on a third. Most people are awful. She placed the last two on top.
Most young children can’t read, and if they can, it’s mostly words like dog
and go.
But Madeline had been reading since age three and, now, at age five, was already through most of Dickens.
Madeline was that kind of child—the kind who could hum a Bach concerto but couldn’t tie her own shoes; who could explain the earth’s rotation but stumbled at tic-tac-toe. And that was the problem. Because while musical prodigies are always celebrated, early readers aren’t. And that’s because early readers are only good at something others will eventually be good at, too. So being first isn’t special—it’s just annoying.
Madeline understood this. That’s why she made it a point each morning—after her mother had left and while her babysitter neighbor, Harriet, was busy—to extract the notes from the lunch box, read them, then store them with all the other notes that she kept in a shoebox in the back of her closet. Once at school she pretended to be like all the other kids: basically illiterate. To Madeline, fitting in mattered more than anything. And her proof was irrefutable: her mother had never fit in and look what happened to her.
—
It was there, in the Southern California town of Commons, where the weather was mostly warm, but not too warm, and the sky was mostly blue, but not too blue, and the air was clean because air just was back then, that she lay in her bed, eyes closed, and waited. Soon she knew there’d be a gentle kiss on her forehead, a careful tuck of covers about her shoulders, a murmuring of Seize the day
in her ear. In another minute, she’d hear the start of a car engine, a crunch of tires as the Plymouth backed down the drive, a clunky shift from reverse to first. And then her permanently depressed mother would set off for the television studio where she would don an apron and walk out onto a set.
The show was called Supper at Six, and Elizabeth Zott was its indisputable star.
Chapter 2
Pine
Once a research chemist, Elizabeth Zott was a woman with flawless skin and an unmistakable demeanor of someone who was not average and never would be.
She was, as all good stars are, discovered. Although in Elizabeth’s case, there was no malt shop, no accidental bench sighting, no lucky introduction. Instead, it was theft—specifically food theft—that led to her discovery.
The story was simple: a child named Amanda Pine, who enjoyed food in a way some therapists consider significant, was eating Madeline’s lunch. This was because Madeline’s lunch was not average. While all the other children gummed their peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, Madeline opened her lunch box to find a thick slice of leftover lasagna, a side helping of buttery zucchini, an exotic kiwi cut into quarters, five pearly round cherry tomatoes, a tiny Morton salt shaker, two still-warm chocolate chip cookies, and a red plaid thermos full of ice-cold milk.
These contents were why everyone wanted Madeline’s lunch, Madeline included. But Madeline offered it to Amanda because friendship requires sacrifice, but also because Amanda was the only one in the entire school who didn’t make fun of the odd child Madeline already knew she was.
It wasn’t until Elizabeth noticed that Madeline’s clothes began to hang on her bony frame like bad drapes that she began to wonder what was going on. According to her calculations, Madeline’s daily intake was exactly what her daughter required for optimal development, making weight loss scientifically inconceivable. A growth spurt, then? No. She’d accounted for growth in her calculations. Early onset food disorder? Not likely. Madeline ate like a horse at dinner. Leukemia? Definitely not. Elizabeth wasn’t an alarmist—she wasn’t the type who lay awake at night imagining her daughter was plagued by incurable disease. As a scientist, she always sought a sensible explanation, and the moment she met Amanda Pine, her little lips stained a pomodoro-sauce red, she knew she’d found it.
—
Mr. Pine,
Elizabeth said, sweeping into the local television studio and past a secretary on a Wednesday afternoon, I’ve been calling you for three days, and not once have you managed the courtesy of a return call. My name is Elizabeth Zott. I am Madeline Zott’s mother—our children attend Woody Elementary together—and I’m here to tell you that your daughter is offering my daughter friendship under false pretenses.
And because he looked confused, she added, Your daughter is eating my daughter’s lunch.
L-lunch?
Walter Pine managed, as he took in the woman who stood resplendent before him, her white lab coat casting an aura of holy light save for one detail: the initials E.Z.
emblazoned in red just above the pocket.
Your daughter, Amanda,
Elizabeth charged again, eats my daughter’s lunch. Apparently, it’s been going on for months.
Walter could only stare. Tall and angular, with hair the color of burnt buttered toast pulled back and secured with a pencil, she stood, hands on hips, her lips unapologetically red, her skin luminous, her nose straight. She looked down at him like a battlefield medic assessing whether or not he was worth saving.
And the fact that she pretends to be Madeline’s friend to get her lunch,
she continued, is absolutely reprehensible.
Wh-who are you again?
stammered Walter.
Elizabeth Zott!
she barked back. Madeline Zott’s mother!
Walter nodded, trying to understand. As a longtime producer of afternoon television, he knew drama. But this? He continued to stare. She was stunning. He was literally stunned by her. Was she auditioning for something?
I’m sorry,
he finally said. But all the nurse roles have been cast.
I beg your pardon?
she snapped.
There was a long pause.
Amanda Pine,
she repeated.
He blinked. My daughter? Oh,
he said, suddenly nervous. What about her? Are you a doctor? Are you from the school?
He leapt to his feet.
Good god, no,
Elizabeth replied. I’m a chemist. I’ve come all the way over here from Hastings on my lunch hour because you’ve failed to return my calls.
And when he continued to look baffled, she clarified. Hastings Research Institute? Where Groundbreaking Research Breaks Ground?
She exhaled at the vacuous tagline. The point is, I put a great amount of effort into making a nutritious lunch for Madeline—something that I’m sure you also strive to do for your child.
And when he continued to stare at her blankly, she added, Because you care about Amanda’s cognitive and physical development. Because you know such development is reliant on offering the correct balance of vitamins and minerals.
The thing is, Mrs. Pine is—
Yes, I know. Missing in action. I tried to contact her but was told she lives in New York.
We’re divorced.
Sorry to hear, but divorce has little to do with lunch.
It might seem that way, but—
"A man can make lunch, Mr. Pine. It is not biologically impossible."
Absolutely,
he agreed, fumbling with a chair. Please, Mrs. Zott, please sit.
I have something in the cyclotron,
she said irritably, glancing at her watch. Do we have an understanding or not?
Cyclo—
Subatomic particle accelerator.
Elizabeth glanced at the walls. They were filled with framed posters advertising melodramatic soap operas and gimmicky game shows.
My work,
Walter said, suddenly embarrassed by their crassness. Maybe you’ve seen one?
She turned back to face him. Mr. Pine,
she said in a more conciliatory manner, I’m sorry I don’t have the time or resources to make your daughter lunch. We both know food is the catalyst that unlocks our brains, binds our families, and determines our futures. And yet…
She trailed off, her eyes growing narrow as she took in a soap opera poster featuring a nurse giving a patient some unusual care. Does anyone have the time to teach the entire nation to make food that matters? I wish I did, but I don’t. Do you?
As she turned to leave, Pine, not wanting her to go or fully understanding what he was about to hatch, said quickly, "Wait, please just stop—please. What—what was that thing you just said? About teaching the whole nation how to make food that—that matters?"
Supper at Six debuted four weeks later. And while Elizabeth wasn’t entirely keen on the idea—she was a research chemist—she took the job for the usual reasons: it paid more and she had a child to support.
—
From the first day Elizabeth donned an apron and walked onto the set, it was obvious: she had it,
the it
being that elusive, entirely watchable quality. But she was also a person of substance—someone so forthright, so no-nonsense that people didn’t know what to make of her. While other cooking shows featured good-natured chefs gleefully tipping back the sherry, Elizabeth Zott was serious. She never smiled. She never made jokes. And her dishes were as honest and down-to-earth as she was.
Within six months, Elizabeth’s show was a rising star. Within a year, an institution. And within two years, it had proven its uncanny power not only to unite parents with their children, but citizens with their country. It is not an exaggeration to say that when Elizabeth Zott finished cooking, an entire nation sat down to eat.
Even Vice President Lyndon Johnson watched her show. "You want to know what I think? he said as he waved off a persistent reporter.
I think you ought to write less and watch TV more. Start with Supper at Six—that Zott, she knows what she’s doing."
And she did. You’d never find Elizabeth Zott explaining how to make tiny cucumber sandwiches or delicate soufflés. Her recipes were hearty: stews, casseroles, things made in big metal pans. She stressed the four food groups. She believed in decent portions. And she insisted that any dish worth making was worth making in under an hour. She ended every show with her signature line: Children, set the table. Your mother needs a moment to herself.
But then a prominent reporter wrote an article entitled Why We’ll Eat Whatever She Dishes Out
and, in passing, referred to her as Luscious Lizzie,
a nickname that, because it was both apt and alliterative, stuck to her as quickly as it did the paper it was printed on. From that day forward, strangers called her Luscious, but her daughter, Madeline, called her Mom, and although she was just a child, Madeline could already see that the nickname belittled her mother’s talents. She was a chemist, not a TV cook. And Elizabeth, self-conscious in front of her only child, felt ashamed.
Sometimes Elizabeth lay in bed at night and wondered how her life had come to this. But the wonder never lasted long because she already knew.
His name was Calvin Evans.
Chapter 3
Hastings Research Institute
TEN YEARS EARLIER, JANUARY 1952
Calvin Evans also worked at Hastings Research Institute, but unlike Elizabeth, who worked in crowded conditions, he had a large lab all to himself.
Based on his track record, maybe he deserved the lab. By age nineteen, he had already contributed critical research that helped famed British chemist Frederick Sanger clinch the Nobel Prize; at twenty-two, he discovered a faster way to synthesize simple proteins; at twenty-four, his breakthrough concerning the reactivity of dibenzoselenophene put him on the cover of Chemistry Today. In addition, he’d authored sixteen scientific papers, received invitations to ten international conferences, and had been offered a fellowship at Harvard. Twice. Which he turned down. Twice. Partly because Harvard had rejected his freshman application years earlier, and partly because—well, actually, there was no other reason. Calvin was a brilliant man, but if he had one flaw, it was his ability to hold a grudge.
On top of his grudge holding, he had a reputation for impatience. Like so many brilliant people, Calvin just couldn’t understand how no one else got it. He was also an introvert, which isn’t really a flaw but often manifests itself as standoffishness. Worst of all, he was a rower.
As any non-rower can tell you, rowers are not fun. This is because rowers only ever want to talk about rowing. Get two or more rowers in a room and the conversation goes from normal topics like work or weather to long, pointless stories about boats, blisters, oars, grips, ergs, feathers, workouts, catches, releases, recoveries, splits, seats, strokes, slides, starts, settles, sprints, and whether the water was really flat
or not. From there, it usually progresses to what went wrong on the last row, what might go wrong on the next row, and whose fault it was and/or will be. At some point the rowers will hold out their hands and compare calluses. If you’re really unlucky, this could be followed by several minutes of head-bowing reverence as one of them recounts the perfect row where it all felt easy.
—
Other than chemistry, rowing was the only thing Calvin had true passion for. In fact, rowing is why Calvin applied to Harvard in the first place: to row for Harvard was, in 1945, to row for the best. Or actually second best. University of Washington was the best, but University of Washington was in Seattle and Seattle had a reputation for rain. Calvin hated rain. Therefore, he looked further afield—to the other Cambridge, the one in England, thus exposing one of the biggest myths about scientists: that they’re any good at research.
The first day Calvin rowed on the Cam, it rained. The second day it rained. Third day: same. "Does it rain like this all the time? Calvin complained as he and his teammates hoisted the heavy wooden boat to their shoulders and lumbered out to the dock.
Oh never, they reassured him,
Cambridge is usually quite balmy." And then they looked at one another as if to confirm what they had already long suspected: Americans were idiots.
—
Unfortunately, his idiocy also extended to dating—a big problem since Calvin very much wanted to fall in love. During all six lonely years he spent in Cambridge, he managed to ask out five women, and of those five, only one consented to a second date, and that was only because she’d thought he was someone else when she answered the phone. His main issue was inexperience. He was like a dog who, after years of trying, catches a squirrel and then has absolutely no idea what to do with it.
Hello—uh,
he’d said, his heart pounding, his hands moist, his mind suddenly completely blank as his date opened the door. Debbie?
"It’s Deirdre," his date sighed, taking the first of what would be many glances at her watch.
At dinner, the conversation lurched between the molecular breakdown of aromatic acids (Calvin), to what movie might be playing (Deirdre), to the synthesis of nonreactive proteins (Calvin), to whether or not he liked to dance (Deirdre), to look at the time, it was already eight thirty p.m. and he had to row in the morning so he would be taking her straight home (Calvin).
It goes without saying that there was very little sex after these dates. Actually, there was none.
—
I can’t believe you’re having trouble,
his Cambridge teammates would tell him. "Girls love rowers. Which wasn’t true.
And even though you’re an American, you’re not bad looking." Which was also not true.
Part of the problem was Calvin’s posture. He was six feet four inches tall, lanky and long, but he slouched to the right—probably a by-product of always rowing stroke side. But the bigger issue was his face. He had a lonesome look about him, like a child who’d had to raise himself, with large gray eyes and messy blondish hair and purplish lips, the latter of which were nearly always swollen because he tended to chew on them. His was the kind of face that some might call forgettable, a below-average composition that gave no hint of the longing or intelligence that lay behind, save for one critical feature—his teeth—which were straight and white, and which redeemed his entire facial landscape whenever he smiled. Fortunately, especially after falling in love with Elizabeth Zott, Calvin smiled all the time.
—
They first met—or rather, exchanged words—on a Tuesday morning at Hastings Research Institute, the sunny Southern Californian private research lab where Calvin, having graduated from Cambridge with a PhD in record time and with forty-three employment offers to weigh, accepted a position partly because of reputation, but mostly because of precipitation. It didn’t rain much in Commons. Elizabeth, on the other hand, accepted Hastings’s offer because it was the only one she received.
As she stood outside Calvin Evans’s lab, she noted a number of large warning signs:
DO NOT ENTER
EXPERIMENT IN PROGRESS
NO ADMITTANCE
KEEP OUT
Then she opened the door.
Hello,
she called over Frank Sinatra, who was blasting from a hi-fi that sat incongruously in the middle of the room. I need to speak to whoever is in charge.
Calvin, surprised to hear a voice, poked his head out from behind a large centrifuge.
Excuse me, miss,
he called, irritated, a large pair of goggles shielding his eyes from whatever was bubbling off to his right, but this area is off-limits. Didn’t you see the signs?
"I did, Elizabeth yelled back, ignoring his tone as she made her way across the lab to switch off the music.
There. Now we can hear each other."
Calvin chewed his lips and pointed. You can’t be in here,
he said. "The signs."
Yes, well, I was told that your lab has a surplus of beakers and we’re short downstairs. It’s all here,
she said, thrusting a piece of paper at him. It’s been cleared by the inventory manager.
I didn’t hear anything about it,
Calvin said, examining the paper. And I’m sorry, but no. I need every beaker. Maybe I’d better speak with a chemist down there. You tell your boss to call me.
He turned back to his work, flipping the hi-fi back on as he did.
Elizabeth didn’t move. You want to speak to a chemist? Someone other than ME?
she yelled over Frank.
Yes,
he answered. And then he softened slightly. Look, I know it’s not your fault, but they shouldn’t send a secretary up here to do their dirty work. Now I know this might be hard for you to understand, but I’m in the middle of something important. Please. Just tell your boss to call me.
Elizabeth’s eyes narrowed. She did not care for people who made assumptions based on what she felt were long-outdated visual clues, and she also didn’t care for men who believed, even if she had been a secretary, that being a secretary meant she was incapable of understanding words beyond Type this up in triplicate.
What a coincidence,
she shouted as she went straight over to a shelf and helped herself to a large box of beakers. I’m busy too.
Then she marched out.
—
More than three thousand people worked at Hastings Research Institute—that’s why it took Calvin over a week to track her down—and when he did finally find her, she seemed not to remember him.
Yes?
she said, turning to see who had entered her lab, a large pair of safety glasses magnifying her eyes, her hands and forearms wrapped in large rubber mitts.
Hello,
he said. It’s me.
Me?
she asked. Could you be more specific?
She turned back to her work.
Me,
Calvin said. Five floors up? You took my beakers?
You might want to stand back behind that curtain,
she said, tossing her head to the left. We had a little accident in here last week.
You’re hard to track down.
Do you mind?
she asked. "Now I’m in the middle of something important."
He waited patiently while she finished her measurements, made notations in her book, reexamined yesterday’s test results, and went to the restroom.
You’re still here?
she asked, coming back. Don’t you have work to do?
Tons.
You can’t have your beakers back.
So, you do remember me.
Yes. But not fondly.
I came to apologize.
No need.
How about lunch?
No.
Dinner?
No.
Coffee?
Listen,
Elizabeth said, her large mitts resting on her hipbones, you should know you’re starting to annoy me.
Calvin looked away, embarrassed. I sincerely beg your pardon,
he said. I’ll go.
—
"Was that Calvin Evans? a lab tech asked as he watched Calvin weave his way through fifteen scientists working elbow to elbow in a space a quarter the size of Calvin’s private lab.
What was he doing down here?"
Minor beaker ownership issue,
Elizabeth said.
Beakers?
He hesitated. Wait.
He picked up one of the new beakers. "That big box of beakers you said you found last week. They were his?"
"I never said I found beakers. I said I acquired beakers."
From Calvin Evans?
he said. Are you crazy?
Not technically.
Did he say you could take his beakers?
Not technically. But I had a form.
What form? You know you have to go through me. You know ordering supplies is my job.
"I understand. But I’ve been waiting for more than three months. I’ve asked you four times, I’ve filled out five requisition orders, I’ve spoken to Dr. Donatti about it. Honestly, I didn’t know what else to do. My research depends on getting these supplies. They’re just beakers."
The lab tech closed his eyes. Listen,
he said, slowly reopening them as if to dramatize her stupidity. I’ve been here a lot longer than you and I know things. You know what Calvin Evans is famous for, don’t you? Besides chemistry?
Yes. Having an excess of equipment.
No,
he said. He’s famous for holding a grudge. A grudge!
Really?
she said taking interest.
—
Elizabeth Zott held grudges too. Except her grudges were mainly reserved for a patriarchal society founded on the idea that women were less. Less capable. Less intelligent. Less inventive. A society that believed men went to work and did important things—discovered planets, developed products, created laws—and women stayed at home and raised children. She didn’t want children—she knew this about herself—but she also knew that plenty of other women did want children and a career. And what was wrong with that? Nothing. It was exactly what men got.
She’d recently read about some country where both parents worked and took part in raising the children. Where was that, again? Sweden? She couldn’t remember. But the upshot was, it functioned very well. Productivity was higher; families were stronger. She saw herself living in such a society. A place that didn’t always automatically mistake her for a secretary, a place where, when she presented her findings in a meeting, she didn’t have to brace herself for the men who would invariably talk over her, or worse, take credit for her work. Elizabeth shook her head. When it came to equality, 1952 was a real disappointment.
You have to apologize to him,
the lab tech was insisting. When you take the damn beakers back, grovel. You put our entire lab at risk, and you made me look bad.
It’ll be fine,
Elizabeth said. They’re beakers.
But by the next morning, the beakers were gone, replaced by dirty looks from a few of her fellow chemists who now also believed she’d put them in jeopardy of Calvin Evans’s legendary grudge holding. She tried to talk with them, but each gave her the cold shoulder in their own way, and later, as she was walking by the lounge, she overheard the same few grousing about her—about how she took herself so seriously, how she thought she was better than any of them, how she’d refused dates from all of them, even the single men. And how the only way she could have possibly gotten her master’s from UCLA in organic chemistry was the hard way—the word hard
being accompanied by rude gestures and tight laughter. Who did she think she was anyway?
Someone ought to put her in her place,
said one.
She’s not even that smart,
insisted another.
She’s a cunt,
declared a familiar voice. Her boss, Donatti.
Elizabeth, accustomed to the first words but stunned by the last, pressed herself against the wall, overcome by a wave of nausea. This was the second time she’d been called that word. The first time—the first horrible time—had been at UCLA.
—
It had happened nearly two years ago. A master’s candidate with only ten days left before graduation, she was still in the lab at nine p.m., certain she’d found a problem with the test protocol. As she tapped a freshly sharpened number-two pencil against the paper, weighing her hunch, she heard the door open.
Hello?
she called. She wasn’t expecting anyone.
You’re still here,
said a voice free of surprise. Her advisor.
Oh. Hello, Dr. Meyers,
she said, looking up. Yes. Just going over the test protocol for tomorrow. I think I found a problem.
He opened the door a little wider, stepping inside. I didn’t ask you to do that,
he said, his voice edgy with irritation. I told you it was all set.
I know,
she said. But I wanted to give it one last look.
The one-last-look approach wasn’t something Elizabeth liked to do—it was something she knew she had to do to maintain her position on Meyers’s all-male research team. Not that she really cared about his research: his was safe stuff, not at all groundbreaking. Despite a notable lack of creativity paired with an alarming absence of new discoveries, Meyers was considered one of the top DNA researchers in the United States.
Elizabeth didn’t like Meyers; no one did. Except, possibly, UCLA, who loved him because the man published more papers than anyone in the field. Meyers’s secret? He didn’t write the papers—his graduate students did. But he always took full credit for every word, sometimes only changing the title and a few phrases here and there before passing it off as an entirely different paper, which he could do because who reads a scientific paper all the way through? No one. Thus his papers grew in number, and with them, his reputation. That’s how Meyers became a top DNA researcher: quantity.
Besides his talent for superfluous papers, Meyers was also famous for being a lecher. There weren’t many women in the science departments at UCLA, but the few there were—mostly secretaries—became the focus of his unwanted attention. They usually left after six months, their confidence shaken, their eyes swollen, citing personal reasons. But Elizabeth did not leave—she couldn’t, she needed the master’s. So she endured the day-to-day degradations—the touches, the lewd comments, the rank suggestions—while making it clear she had no interest. Until the day he called her into his office, ostensibly to talk about her admittance to his doctoral program, but instead shoving his hand up her skirt. Furious, she forcibly removed it, then threatened to report him.
To whom?
he laughed. Then he admonished her for being no fun
and swatted her bottom, demanding that she go fetch his coat from his office closet, knowing that when she opened the door she would find it lined with pictures of topless women, a few splayed, expressionless, on their hands and knees, a man’s shoe resting triumphantly on their backs.
—
It’s here,
she said to Dr. Meyers. Step ninety-one on page two thirty-two. The temperature. I’m fairly certain it’s too high, which means the enzyme will be rendered inactive, skewing the results.
Dr. Meyers watched her from the door. Did you show this to anyone else?
No,
she said. I just noticed it.
So, you haven’t talked with Phillip.
Phillip was Meyers’s top research assistant.
No,
she said. He just left. I’m sure I could still catch him—
No need,
he interrupted. Is anyone else here?
Not that I know of.
The protocol is right,
he said sharply. You’re not the expert. Stop questioning my authority. And don’t mention this to anyone else. Do you understand?
I was only trying to help, Dr. Meyers.
He looked at her, as if weighing the veracity of her offer. And I need your help,
he said. And then he turned back toward the door and locked it.
—
His first blow was an open-handed slap that spun her head to the left like a well-hit tetherball. She gasped in shock, then managed to right herself, her mouth bleeding, her eyes wide with disbelief. He grimaced as if unsatisfied with his results, then hit her again, this time knocking her off the stool. Meyers was a big man—nearly 250 pounds—his strength a product of density, not fitness. He bent down to where she lay on the floor and, grabbing her by the hips, hoisted her up like a crane lifting a sloppy load of lumber, plunking her back down on the stool like a rag doll. Then he flipped her over, and kicking the stool away, slammed her face and chest against the stainless-steel counter. "Hold still, cunt," he demanded as she struggled, his fat fingers clawing beneath her skirt.
Elizabeth gasped, the taste of metal filling her mouth as he mauled her, one hand pulling her skirt up past her waist, the other twisting the skin of her inner thighs. With her face flat against the table, she could barely breathe, let alone scream. She kicked back furiously like an animal caught in a trap, but her refusal to concede only infuriated him more.
Don’t fight me,
he warned, as sweat dripped from his stomach onto the backs of her thighs. But as he moved, her arm regained freedom. "Hold still," he demanded, enraged, as she twisted back and forth, gasping in shock, his bulbous torso flattening her body like a pancake. In a final effort to remind her who was in charge he gripped her hair and yanked. Then he shoved himself inside her like a sloppy drunk, moaning with satisfaction until it was cut short by a shriek of pain.
Fuck!
Meyers yelled, pulling his weight from her. Jesus, fuck! What was that?
He shoved her away, confused by a blaze of misery springing from the right side of his body. He looked down at his blubbery waist, trying to make sense of the pain, but all he saw was a small pink eraser sticking out from his right iliac region. It was encircled by a narrow moat of blood.
The number-two pencil. With her free hand, Elizabeth had found it, gripped it, and driven it straight into his side. Not just part of it—all of it. Its sharply pointed lead, its friendly yellow wood, its shiny gold band—all seven inches of it versus all seven inches of him. And in doing so, she pierced not only his large and small intestine, but her academic career as well.
—
"Do you really go here? the campus police officer said after an ambulance had taken Dr. Meyers away.
I need to see some student ID."
Elizabeth, her clothes torn, her hands shaking, a large bruise beginning to bloom on her forehead, looked back, incredulous.
It’s a valid question,
the officer said. What would a woman be doing in a lab this time of night?
I’m a gr-graduate student,
she stuttered, feeling like she might be sick. In chemistry.
The officer exhaled as if he didn’t have time for this sort of nonsense, then took out a small notepad. "Why don’t you tell me what you think happened."
Elizabeth supplied him with the details, her voice dulled by shock. He looked as if he was jotting it down, but when he turned away to tell another officer he had it all under control,
she noticed that the notepad was blank.
Please. I…I need a doctor.
He flipped his notepad shut. "Would