Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Advertisement

The super user selection for building a sustainable online social network marketing community

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Constructing the sustainable Online Social Network Marketing Community (OSNMC) is a particularly effective approach to trumpet the products and enhance the customer experience. Super users are considered as opinion leaders, high influence users, and other active users who play a crucial role in enhancing the sustainability of OSNMC. Recruiting sustainable super users is the essential first step to solve unsustainability issues such as the low participation rates and privacy threats problems in the online community. An integrated Fuzzy System Dynamic Model (FSDM) is proposed for selecting suitable super users to build a sustainable OSNMC. FSDM focuses on the super users’ behavioral characteristics of the high-active participation and keen ability to protect privacy. Moreover, the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process method is adopted to obtain the weight of each characteristic, and the growth rate of sustainability is settled with fuzzy Takagi-Sugeno-type fuzzy inference system to address the challenges of the uncertain relationships between super user’s characteristic combinations and the OSNMC sustainability. It does not need line feeds here.

FSDM simulates the fashion marketing community sustainability under super user’s different characteristic combinations in four scenarios. The results show that the OSNMC sustainability needs not only an open and active environment but also privacy control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anonymity (2018) How social communities and social networks differ. Available at: https://www.lithium.com/resources/how-to-guides/how-social-communities-and-social-networks-differ

  2. Gong Z, Liu S (2006) On properties and the corresponding problems of triangular fuzzy number complementary preference relations, International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery. Springer, Berlin, pp 334–343

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hofacker CF, Belanche D (2016) Eight social media challenges for marketing managers. Spanish Journal of Marketing-ESIC 20(2):73–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hu H, Han D, Wang X (2010) Individual popularity and activity in online social systems. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 389(5):1065–1070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jafarzadeh M, Gans N, Tadesse Y (2018) Control of TCP muscles using Takagi–Sugeno–Kang fuzzy inference system. Mechatronics 2018(53):124–139

  6. John LK, Emrich O, Gupta S et al (2017) Does “liking” lead to loving? The impact of joining a brand’s social network on marketing outcomes. J Mark Res 54(1):144–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Johnson DS, Lowe B (2015) Emotional support, perceived corporate ownership and skepticism toward out-groups in virtual communities. J Interact Mark 29:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jussila JJ, Kärkkäinen H, Aramo-Immonen H (2014) Social media utilization in business-to-business relationships of technology industry firms. Comput Hum Behav 30:606–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Katsamakas E, Georgantzas NC (2007) Open source software development: a systems dynamics model. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society and 50th Anniversary Celebration, 29

  10. Kim MS, Kim HM (2017) The effect of online fan community attributes on the loyalty and cooperation of fan community members: The moderating role of connect hours. Comput Hum Behav 68:232–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim HS, Mrotek A (2016) A functional and structural diagnosis of online health communities sustainability: A focus on resource richness and site design features. Comput Hum Behav 63:362–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kwak H, Lee C, Park H, et al (2010) What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World Wide Web. AcM, 591-600

  13. Li Q, Wang Q, Lin Z (2018) Effects of consumer visit to online community and product channel on local sales of large consumer goods: Evidence from real estate industry. J Strateg Inf Syst 27(2):191–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Luo N, Zhang M, Hu M et al (2016) How community interactions contribute to harmonious community relationships and customers’ identification in online brand community. Int J Inf Manag 36(5):673–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ma N, Liu Y (2014) SuperedgeRank algorithm and its application in identifying opinion leader of online public opinion super network. Expert Syst Appl 41(4):1357–1368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Maar MC (2013) An examination of organizational information protection in the era of social media: A study of social network security and privacy protection. Proquest Llc 2013:359

  17. Malinen S (2015) Understanding user participation in online communities: A systematic literature review of empirical studies. Comput Hum Behav 46:228–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mosteller J, Poddar A (2017) To share and protect: Using regulatory focus theory to examine the privacy paradox of consumers' social media engagement and online privacy protection behaviors. J Interact Mark 39:27–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Orji IJ, Wei S (2015) An innovative integration of fuzzy-logic and systems dynamics in sustainable supplier selection: A case on manufacturing industry. Comput Ind Eng 88:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Otto P, Simon M (2008) Dynamic perspectives on social characteristics and sustainability in online community networks. System Dynamics Review: The Journal of the System Dynamics. Society 24(3):321–347

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pensa RG, Di Blasi G (2017) A privacy self-assessment framework for online social networks. Expert Syst Appl 86:18–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ruan Y, Durresi A (2016) A survey of trust management systems for online social communities – Trust modeling, trust inference and attacks. Knowl-Based Syst 106:150–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shire MI, Jun GT, Robinson S (2018) The application of system dynamics modelling to system safety improvement: Present use and future potential. Saf Sci 106:104–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Song K, Wang D, Feng S et al (2012) Detecting positive opinion leader group from forum. International Conference on Web-Age Information Management. Springer, Berlin, pp 95–101

    Google Scholar 

  25. Stelzner MA (2010) Social media marketing industry report. Available at: http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/social-mediamarketing-industry-report-2010/

  26. Tanimoto J (2016) A multi-community homogeneous small-world network and its fundamental characteristics. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 460:88–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Van Mierlo T, Voci S, Lee S et al (2012) Super users in social networks for smoking cessation: analysis of demographic characteristics and posting behavior from the Canadian Cancer Society's smokers' helpline online and Stop Smoking Center. Net. J Med Internet Res 14(3):e66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wasko MML, Faraj S (2000) “It is what one does”: why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice. J Strateg Inf Syst 9(2-3):155–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yang X, Li G (2016) Factors influencing the popularity of customer-generated content in a company-hosted online co-creation community: A social capital perspective. Comput Hum Behav 64:760–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yang X, Li G, Huang SS (2017) Perceived online community support, member relations, and commitment: differences between posters and lurkers. Inf Manag 54(2):154–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Young C (2013) Community management that works: how to build and sustain a thriving online health community. J Med Internet Res 15(6):e119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhu DH, Sun H, Chang YP (2016) Effect of social support on customer satisfaction and citizenship behavior in online brand communities: The moderating role of support source. J Retail Consum Serv 31:287–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhu T, Wang B, Wu B et al (2012) Topic correlation and individual influence analysis in online forums. Expert Syst Appl 39(4):4222–4232

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Chinese National Natural Science Foundation (No. 71271132,71871135), and by Shanghai Pujiang Program (No.15PJC049).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shugang Li.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, F., Li, S. & Yu, Z. The super user selection for building a sustainable online social network marketing community. Multimed Tools Appl 78, 14777–14798 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-6829-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-6829-0

Keywords