Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

A machine learning approach for multiple sclerosis diagnosis through Detecron Architecture

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis is a prevalent inflammatory disease affecting the central nervous system, leading to demyelination. Neuroradiology relies on accurate analysis of white matter lesions for diagnosis and prognosis. Automated methods for segmenting lesions in MRI scans offer crucial benefits of objectivity and efficiency, making them particularly valuable for analyzing large datasets. In contrast, manual delineation of MRI lesions is both time-consuming and prone to subjective bias. To overcome these issues, this paper proposes and develops an automated diagnosis approach using the Detecron-2 architecture. The method utilizes a fully modified Convolutional Neural Network on 3D FLAIR-weighted Magnetic Resonance Images.The approach is trained and validated on a dataset of 3000 images acquired from a Siemens 3Tesla MRI machine at the National Institute of Neurology Mongi Ben Hmida in Tunisia, using technical metrics. Comparisons with recent achievements demonstrate promising results. By addressing challenges in data augmentation and deep learning configurations, the proposed model effectively mitigates issues as overfitting. Notably, it achieves an impressive average detection accuracy of 87%, specificity (= 80,19%), precision (= 80%), sensitivity (= 76,1%) and intersection over Union (= 87,9%) when assessing healthy and pathological images. Additionally, the study recognizes the manual monitoring of multiple sclerosis plaques as a time-consuming and challenging task for clinicians. It highlights the importance of lesion segmentation for quantitative analysis of disease progression. As a second focus, the research aims to develop an automated segmentation to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of lesion identification, addressing the inconsistencies and variations observed among different observers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3 
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to the exclusive nature of the national institute of neurology Mongi ben Hmida’s proprietary database. WHY DATA ARE NOT PUBLIC but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Kuhlmann T, Moccia M et al (2023) Multiple sclerosis progression: time for a new mechanism-driven framework. Lancet Neurol 22(1):78–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00289-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Martins T, Carvalho V, Soares F, Leão C (2023) Physioland: a motivational complement of physical therapy for patients with neurological diseases. Multimed Tools Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-16051-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rodríguez S, Mauricio F et al (2022) The immune response in multiple sclerosis. Annu Rev Pathol 17:121–139. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-pathol-052920-040318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Xinda Z, Claire J (2023) Mechanisms of demyelination and remyelination strategies for multiple sclerosis. Int J Mol Sci 24(7):6373. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24076373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Boesen S, Blinkenberg M et al (2022) Magnetic resonance imaging criteria at onset to differentiate pediatric multiple sclerosis from acute disseminated encephalomyelitis: a nationwide cohort study. Multiple Scler Relat Disord 62:103738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2022.103738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Siger M (2022) Magnetic resonance imaging in primary progressive multiple sclerosis patients. Clin Neuroradiol 32(3):625–641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-022-01144-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Massimo F, Preziosa P et al (2023) Present and future of the diagnostic work-up of multiple sclerosis: the imaging perspective. J Neurol 270:1286–1299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-022-11488-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Liang S, Derek B et al (2021) Magnetic resonance imaging sequence identification using a metadata learning approach. Front Neuroinformatics 15:622951. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2021.622951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Berger C, Birkl C et al (2022) Technical note: quantitative optimization of the FLAIR sequence in postmortem magnetic resonance imaging. Forensic Sci Int 341:111494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Roozpeykar S, Azizian M et al (2022) Contrast-enhanced weighted-T1 and FLAIR sequences in MRI of meningeal lesions. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 12(2):63–70

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zamzam A, Aboukhadrah R et al (2022) Diagnostic value of three-dimensional cube fluid attenuated inversion recovery imaging and its axial MIP reconstruction in multiple sclerosis. Egypt J Radiol Nuclear Med 53(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-022-00795-z

  12. Eliezer M et al (2022) Iterative denoising accelerated 3D SPACE FLAIR sequence for brain MR imaging at 3T. Diagn Interv Imaging 103(1):13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2021.09.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Thakur S, Schindler M et al (2022) Clinically deployed computational assessment of multiple sclerosis lesions. Front Med 9:797586. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.797586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sarica B, Seker D (2022) New MS lesion segmentation with deep residual attention gate U-Net utilizing 2D slices of 3D MR images. Front NeuroSci 16:912000. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.912000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Filippi M, Preziosa P, Meani A et al (2022) Performance of the 2017 and 2010 revised McDonald criteria in predicting MS diagnosis after a clinically isolated syndrome: a MAGNIMS study. Neurology 98(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000013016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sadeghibakhi M, Pourreza H, Mahyar H (2022) Multiple sclerosis lesions segmentation using attention-based CNNs in FLAIR images. IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med 10:1800411. https://doi.org/10.1109/JTEHM.2022.3172025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Krishnan A, Song Z et al (2022) Joint MRI T1 unenhancing and contrast-enhancing multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation with deep learning in OPERA trials. Radiology 302(3):662–673. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.211528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hashemi M, Akhbari M, Jutten C (2022) Delve into multiple sclerosis (MS) lesion exploration: a modified attention U-Net for MS lesion segmentation in Brain MRI. Comput Biol Med 145:105402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ansari S, Javed K et al (2021) Multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation in Brain MRI using Inception Modules embedded in a convolutional neural network. J Healthc Eng 2021:4138137. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4138137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. McKinley R, Wepfer R et al (2021) Simultaneous lesion and brain segmentation in multiple sclerosis using deep neural networks. Sci Rep 11(1):1087. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79925-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang L, Tano R et al (2023) Learning from multiple annotators for medical image segmentation. Pattern Recognit 138:109400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2023.109400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Valverde S, Mariano C et al (2017) Improving automated multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation with a cascaded 3D convolutional neural network approach. Neuroimage 155:159–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.04.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. La Rosa F, Abdulkadir A, Fartaria M et al (2020) Multiple sclerosis cortical and WM lesion segmentation at 3T MRI: a deep learning method based on FLAIR and MP2RAGE. NeuroImage: Clin 27:102335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Manso Jimeno M, Ravi K et al (2022) ArtifactID: identifying artifacts in low-field MRI of the brain using deep learning. Magn Reson Imaging 89:42–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2022.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Motovilova E, Winkler S (2022) Overview of methods for noise and heat reduction in MRI gradient coils. Front Phys 10:907619. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2022.907619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sahu S, Anand A et al (2023) MRI de-noising using improved unbiased NLM filter. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 14:10077–10088. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-021-03681-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Antonelli M, Reinke A et al (2022) The medical segmentation decathlon. Nat Commun 13:4128. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30695-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tomassini V, Sinclair A et al (2020) Diagnosis and management of multiple sclerosis: MRI in clinical practice. J Neurol 267(10):2917–2925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-09930-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Freund M, Schiffmann I et al (2022) Understanding Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis (UMIMS): Development and piloting of an online education program about magnetic resonance imaging for people with multiple sclerosis. Front Neurol 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.856240

  30. Okaz A, Yassin A et al (2023) The role of new MRI modalities in diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Al-Azhar Int Med J 4(1). https://doi.org/10.58675/2682-339X.1631

  31. Memon K, Yahya N et al (2023) Image pre-processing for differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis using brain MRI. 2023 2nd International Conference on Vision Towards Emerging Trends in Communication and Networking Technologies (ViTECoN) 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ViTECoN58111.2023.10157177

  32. Mendelsohn Z, Pemberton H et al (2023) Commercial volumetric MRI reporting tools in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of the evidence. Neuroradiology 65(1):5–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-022-03074-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pozzilli C, Pugliatti M et al (2023) Diagnosis and treatment of progressive multiple sclerosis: a position paper. Eur J Neurol 30(1):9–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.15593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. La Rosa F et al (2019) Shallow vs deep learning architectures for white matter lesion segmentation in the early stages of multiple sclerosis. Int MICCAI Brain Lesion Workshop 142–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11723-8_14

  35. Kats E, Goldberger J, Greenspan H (2019) Soft labeling by distilling anatomical knowledge for improved MS lesion segmentation. Comput Sci. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1901.09263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Krüger J, Opfer R et al (2020) Fully automated longitudinal segmentation of new or enlarged multiple sclerosis lesions using 3D convolutional neural networks. NeuroImage Clin 28:102445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Rehan Afzal H, Luo S et al (2020) Automatic and robust segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesions with convolutional neural networks. Comput Mater Continua 66(1):977–991. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2020.012448

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Higher Institute of Medical Technologies of Tunis, Research Laboratory of Biophysics and Medical Technologies LR13ES07, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia

    Chaima Dachraoui & Salam Labidi

  2. National Engineering School of Tunis, Laboratory of Signal Image and Energy Mastery LR13ES03, University of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia

    Aymen Mouelhi

  3. Computer Science Department, National School of Veterinary Medicine Sidi Thabet, Tunisia Military Academy FondekJdid, Tunis, Tunisia

    Amine Mosbeh & Wassim Sliti

  4. Faculty of Medicine of Tunisia, National Institute of Neurology Mongi Ben Hmida, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia

    Cyrine Drissi

  5. IMT Atlantique, Bretagne, Pays de la Loire, LaTIM UMR 1101, UBL, Brest, France

    Basel Solaiman

Authors
  1. Chaima Dachraoui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aymen Mouelhi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Amine Mosbeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wassim Sliti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Cyrine Drissi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Basel Solaiman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Salam Labidi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study correction. Material preparation, data collection, analysis and paper preparation were performed by [Chaima Dachraoui]. The first draft of the manuscript was written by [ChaimaDachraoui] and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chaima Dachraoui.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

No consent was recommended for this medical research. Personal patient data was not included in the paper. These are anonymous images and well processed protecting the privacy of patients. It is a thesis work in collaboration with the national institute of neurology. We have no direct contact with the patients. The work took place purely in the doctors’ reading room on anonymous acquisitions.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The authors declare that they have no known conflict of interest that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dachraoui, C., Mouelhi, A., Mosbeh, A. et al. A machine learning approach for multiple sclerosis diagnosis through Detecron Architecture. Multimed Tools Appl 83, 42837–42859 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-17055-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-17055-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation