Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Non-sample based parameters design for system performance reliability improvement

  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Design methods for quality generally help to improve quality over time, but do not consider change of system performance over time, resulting from degradation in components. As design methods for quality over time (performance reliability), which minimizes effects of unavoidable component degradations as well as component variations on system performance change, system model-based sampling methods using Monte-Carlo simulations have been used. But, there are main concerns related to computational efficiency and optimization in applying the sampling methods. To overcome the concerns, we propose a non-sample method for quality over time. Based on the proposed method, the process of allocating design parameters, which could minimize the noise effects with the consequence that both quality and performance reliability are optimized, is discussed. Reliability metrics such as mean time to failure and standard deviation of time to failure are optimized simultaneously for reliability improvement. Desirability functions for the metrics are introduced to perform the simultaneous optimization. The proposed method is applied to an electrical system design and compared to a sampling based design method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. Brunelle and K.C. Kapur, Issues in modeling system reliability from customer’s perspective, IEEE Proceedings of International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, San Diego, CA, USA. (1998) 4693–4698.

  2. S. Lu, H. Lu and W.J. Kolarik, Multivariate performance reliability prediction in real Time, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 72(1) (2001) 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. C. Fornell, M. D. Johnson, E. W. Anderson, J. S. Cha and E. B. Bryant, The American customer satisfaction index: nature, purpose, and findings, Journal of Marketing, 60(4) (1996) 7–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. G. J. Savage and Y. K. Son, Design-for-six-sigma for multiple response systems, International Journal of Product Development (Special Issue on building reliability into products during the product development process), 5(1/2) (2008) 39–53.

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. J. Savage and D. A. Swan, Probabilistic robust design with multiple quality characteristics, Journal of Quality Engineering, 13(4) (2001) 629–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. J. A. Van den Bogaard, D. Shangguan, J. S. R. Jayaram, G. Hulsken, A. C. Brombacher and R. A. Ion, Using dynamic reliability models to extend the economic life of strongly innovative products, IEEE Proceedings of International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, Scottsdale, AZ, USA. (2004) 220–225.

  7. M. A. Styblinski, Formulation of the drift reliability optimization problem, Microelectronics Reliability, 31(1) (1991) 159–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. W. Q. Meeker and L. A. Escobar, Reliability: the other dimension of quality, Quality Technology & Quantitative Management, 1(1) (2004) 1–25.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. J. A. Van den Bogaard, J. Shreeram and A. C. Brombacher, A method for reliability optimization through degradation analysis and robust design, IEEE Proceedings of Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, Tampa, FL, USA. (2003) 55–62.

  10. M. A. Styblinski and M. Huang, Drift reliability optimization in IC design: generalized formulation and practical examples, IEEE Transactions on computer-aided design of integrated circuits and systems, 12(8) (1993) 1242–1252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. C. Andrieu-Renaud, B. Sudret and M. Lemaire, The PHI2 method: a way to compute time-variant reliability, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 84(1) (2004) 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. K. Yang and K. C. Kapur, Customer driven reliability: integration of QFD and robust design, IEEE Proceedings of Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, Philadelphia, PA, USA. (1997) 339–345.

  13. W. Huang and R. G. Askin, A generalized SSI reliability model considering stochastic loading and strength aging degradation, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 53(1) (2004) 77–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Rosenblatt, Remarks on a Multivariate Transformation, Annual of Mathematical Statistics, 23 (1952) 470–472.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Y. K. Son and G. J. Savage, Optimal probabilistic design of the dynamic performance of a vibration absorber, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 307(1/2) (2007) 20–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Y. K. Son and G. J. Savage, Set Theoretic Formulation of Performance Reliability of Multiple Response Time-Variant Systems due to Degradations in System Components, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 13(4) (2006) 289–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. B. M. Ayyub and R. H. McCuen, Probability, Statistics, and reliability for Engineers, CRC Press, New York, USA, (1997).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Y. K. Son and G. J. Savage, A new sample-based approach to predict system performance reliability, IEEE transactions on Reliability, 57(2) (2008) 332–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. G. Derringer and R. Suich, Simultaneous optimization of several response variables, Journal of Quality Technology, 12(4) (1980) 214–219.

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. S. Phadke, Quality engineering using robust design, Prentice Hall Publishing, London, UK, (1989).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Young Kap Son.

Additional information

This paper was recommended for publication in revised form by Associate Editor Jooho Choi

Young Kap Son received his PhD from the Department of Systems Design Engineering in 2006 at the University of Waterloo in Canada. Currently, he is a Professor in the School of Mechanical Engineering at the Andong National University. His current research interests include economic-based design for reliability, and physics of failure for general engineering systems.

Jae-Jung Kim received his B.S. and M.S in Mechanical Engineering from Hanyang University, KOREA, in 1997 and in 1999, respectively. He is currently a Research Professor at the Reliability Analysis Research Center at Hanyang University in Seoul, Korea. His research interests include reliability, electronic cooling, and failure analysis.

Seung-Jung Shin received his B.S. in Business Management at Sejong University, Korea, in 1988. He then received his M.S. in Computer Science Engineering Kunkook University, Korea, in 1994, and Ph.D. degree from Kookmin University, Korea, in 2000. He is currently a Professor at the School of Information Technology Division at Hansei University in Seoul, Korea. His research interests include reliability, Security, and Programming.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Son, Y.K., Kim, JJ. & Shin, SJ. Non-sample based parameters design for system performance reliability improvement. J Mech Sci Technol 23, 2658–2667 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-009-0719-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-009-0719-3

Keywords