Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Sustainable Design Implementation – Measuring Environmental Impact and User Responsibility

https://doi.org/10.20965/ijat.2022.p0814

Journal: International Journal of Automation Technology, 2022, № 6, p. 814-823

Publisher: Fuji Technology Press Ltd.

Authors:

  1. Achmad Yahya Teguh Panuju
  2. Martinus Martinus
  3. Akhmad Riszal
  4. Hideki Kobayashi
  5. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universitas Lampung Sumantri Brojonegoro Street No.1, Bandar Lampung 35145, Indonesia
  6. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University, Suita, Japan

Funder DIPA Universitas Lampung

Abstract

Sustainable design in product development has multiple roles in addressing an increased level of sustainability. This includes reducing resource consumption and modifying user behaviors to become more eco-friendly. However, these functions are typically assessed separately, despite a proposed mutual correlation. This paper proposes a framework for defining this correlation. By using the correlated functions in parallel, one can enhance the product development process, and this will strengthen the use of sustainable design as a powerful design tool for future products. A practical approach for implementation is needed, which should show the benefit of the design both from the environmental aspect and a change in the responsibility of users. The primary goal of this manuscript is to propose an approach to fill this gap, using experiments to explore the effect of a washing machine modification project in Indonesia. Resource consumption while doing the laundry is measured as a representation of the environmental impact, while the users’ predisposition for environmental responsibility inclination is analyzed by scaling the responsibility. The results show that the sustainable design strategy is effective in reducing the environmental impact, while simultaneously increasing the environmental responsibility of users. Further study is required to define the correlation between the measured factors to formulate a well-developed theory related to this correlation.

List of references

  1. T. Bhamra and R. J. Hernandez, “Thirty years of design for sustainability: an evolution of research, policy and practice,” Des. Sci., Vol.7, e2, 2021.
    https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2021.2
  2. S. Kauppi, I. N. Pettersen, and C. Boks, “Consumer acceptance of edible insects and design interventions as adoption strategy,” Int. J. of Food Design, Vol.4, No.1, pp. 39-62, 2019.
    https://doi.org/10.1386/ijfd.4.1.39_1
  3. I. Ghazali, S. H. Abdul Rashid, S. Z. Md Dawal, H. Aoyama, A. E. Tontowi, and R. A. R. Ghazilla, “Green product preferences with respect to cultural influences: empirical study in Indonesia,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.12, No.6, pp. 842-852, 2018.
    https://doi.org/10.20965/ijat.2018.p0842
  4. A. Mayyas, M. Omar, M. Hayajneh, and A. R. Mayyas, “Vehicle’s lightweight design vs electrification from life cycle assessment perspective,” J. of Cleaner Production, Vol.167, pp. 687-701, 2017.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.145
  5. A. Hamni, A. Y. T. Panuju, and D. A. S. Ambarwati, “Understanding consumer’s behavior for reducing environmental and social impact through sustainable product design – a study case of vehicle usages in Indonesia,” IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth and Env. Sci., Vol.739, 2021.
    https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/739/1/012052
  6. T. Bhamra, T. Tang, and D. Lilley, “Design for sustainable behaviour: using products to change consumer behaviour,” The Design J., Vol.14, No.4, pp. 427-445, 2011.
    https://doi.org/10.2752/175630611X13091688930453
  7. J. Daae and C. Boks, “A classification of user research methods for design for sustainable behaviour,” J. of Cleaner Production, Vol.106, pp. 680-689, 2015.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.056
  8. E. Kunii, T. Matsuura, S. Fukushige, and Y. Umeda, “Proposal of consistency management method between product and its life cycle design,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.6, No.3, pp. 272-278, 2012.
    https://doi.org/10.20965/ijat.2012.p0272
  9. M. Fargnoli, “Design process optimization for ecodesign,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.3, No.1, pp. 33-39, 2009.
    https://doi.org/10.20965/ijat.2009.p0033
  10. P. Ghisellini, C. Cialani, and S. Ulgiati, “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems,” J. of Cleaner Production, Vol.114, pp. 11-32, 2016.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007
  11. G. Latupeirissa and D. Adhariani, “External and internal economic impacts of eco-innovation and the role of political connections: a sustainability narrative from an emerging market,” J. of Cleaner Production, Vol.258, 120579, 2020.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120579
  12. K. Fujimoto, S. Fukushige, and H. Kobayashi, “Data assimilation mechanism for lifecycle simulation focusing on process behaviors,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.14, No.6, pp. 882-889, 2020.
    https://doi.org/10.20965/ijat.2020.p0882
  13. M. Ham, D. Mrčela, and M. Horvat, “Insights for measuring environmental awareness,” Econviews, Vol.29, No.1, pp. 159-176, 2016.
  14. K. M. R. Taufique, C. B. Siwar, B. A. Talib, and N. Chamhuri, “Measuring consumers’ environmental responsibility: a synthesis of constructs and measurementscale items,” Current World Environment, Vol.9, No.1, pp. 27-36, 2014.
    https://doi.org/10.12944/CWE.9.1.04
  15. H. Mahat, M. Hashim, N. Nayan, S. B. Norkhaidi, and Y. Saleh, “Development of environmental awareness measurement instruments through education for sustainable development,” Proc. of the 8th UPI-UPSI Int. Conf. 2018 (UPI-UPSI 2018), pp. 73-86, 2019.
    https://doi.org/10.2991/upiupsi-18.2019.13
  16. S. M. Crus and B. Manata, “Measurement of environmental concern: a review and analysis,” Front. Psychol., Vol.11, 363, 2020.
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00363
  17. CLASP, “Indonesia Residential End Use Survey,” p. 193, 2020. https://clasp.ngo/publications/indonesia-residential-end-use-survey [Accessed December 20, 2021]
  18. J. C. Tu, Y. Nagari, and M. Shih, “Establishing design strategies and an assessment tool of home appliances to promote sustainable behavior for the new poor,” Sustainability, Vol.10, No.5, 1507, 2018.
    https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051507
  19. A. Y. T. Panuju, D. A. S. Ambarwati, and M. D. Susila, “Implications of automotive product sustainability on young customers’ purchase intention in developing countries: An experimental approach,” IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng., Vol.857, 012024, 2020.
    https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/857/1/012024
  20. H. Kobayashi, S. Fukushige, and H. Murata, “A framework for locally-oriented product design using extended function-structure analysis and mixed prototyping,” Global Environment Research, Vol.25, pp. 43-50, 2021.
  21. A. Bearth, L. Miesler, and M. Siegrist, “Consumers’ risk perception of household cleaning and washing products,” Risk Analysis, Vol.37, No.4, pp. 647-660, 2016.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12635
About this publication
Number of citations 0
Number of works in the list of references 21
Journal indexed in Scopus Yes
Journal indexed in Web of Science Yes

Пошук