IMDb-BEWERTUNG
7,2/10
3642
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuThe history of the American government's war on marijuana in the 20th century.The history of the American government's war on marijuana in the 20th century.The history of the American government's war on marijuana in the 20th century.
- Auszeichnungen
- 1 wins total
Woody Harrelson
- Narrator
- (Synchronisation)
Harry J. Anslinger
- Self
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
George Bush
- Self
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Cab Calloway
- Self
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Jimmy Carter
- Self
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Chevy Chase
- Self
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Tommy Chong
- Anthony 'Man' Stoner
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Dwight D. Eisenhower
- Self
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Gerald Ford
- Self
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Jerry Garcia
- Self
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Allen Ginsberg
- Self
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
John F. Kennedy
- Self
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Gene Krupa
- Self
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Fiorello LaGuardia
- Self
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Timothy Leary
- Self
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
John Lennon
- Self
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Cheech Marin
- Pedro De Pacas
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Handlung
WUSSTEST DU SCHON:
- WissenswertesWoody Harrelson narrated this documentary for free.
- Zitate
["Prohibition cannot be enforced for the simple reason that the majority of the American people do not want it enforced and are resisting its enforcement. That being so, the orderly thing to do under our form of government is to abolish a law that cannot be enforced, a law which the people of the country do not want enforced."]
- Crazy CreditsNo hippies were harmed in the making of this movie.
- SoundtracksQuit Playing Games With God! (Grass Theme)
Written by Mark Mothersbaugh
Performed by Mark Mothersbaugh
Ausgewählte Rezension
Nice that they got Harrelson for the narration (not to mention some of the Firesign guys, etc.).
Perhaps a little *too* boffo at times, but nonetheless a wonderful compendium of pot Americana crafted, accrued, and organized to drive home an important point; what on God's green earth drives this monumental institutional fuss over a weed?
I will look at anything Paul Mavrides (Art Direction) puts his hand to; he's such a monster, gob bless 'im!
For some reason, I'm driven to make a very generic point about this genre of film by highlighting the "inscrutability" of the subject matter. In my mind, "Grass" is in the same category as unexplained phenomena, religion, conspiracies, suppressed inventions, etc. I call it "topic candy", as it pushes the mind to attempt to objectivize the subjective in a fun and frolicsome way. Again: What, after all, *are* the underlying mental/spiritual/social attitudes that fuel marijuana scares, and a kind of concentrated paternalism that makes state socialism look like mom 'n' pop free enterprise by comparison? And attempts by films like "Grass" to attack these kinds of topics is a high-risk game. When you tackle a subject which is, after all, a mental state, you risk appearing irrationally predisposed, but at the same time stand the chance of turning over a rock somewhere in our collective consciousness to find something that is true and illuminating. Which leads to the questions: Does "Grass" take these risks? Yes. Do these risks pay off in "Grass"? My answer: A qualified "maybe". Whether "Grass" succeeds or not isn't as important to me as the fact that it takes those risks. That's really how I feel. And, maybe, that willingness to put things out "on the line" is a kind of success in itself.
If you are a fan of edgy sonics and graphics and have an interest in U.S. anti-drug hysteria, take the time to watch this film. It'll teach you a *few* things you may not have known before. And its highlighting of the mounting national expense for the drug war (fiscal and social) *will* give you serious pause....
Perhaps a little *too* boffo at times, but nonetheless a wonderful compendium of pot Americana crafted, accrued, and organized to drive home an important point; what on God's green earth drives this monumental institutional fuss over a weed?
I will look at anything Paul Mavrides (Art Direction) puts his hand to; he's such a monster, gob bless 'im!
For some reason, I'm driven to make a very generic point about this genre of film by highlighting the "inscrutability" of the subject matter. In my mind, "Grass" is in the same category as unexplained phenomena, religion, conspiracies, suppressed inventions, etc. I call it "topic candy", as it pushes the mind to attempt to objectivize the subjective in a fun and frolicsome way. Again: What, after all, *are* the underlying mental/spiritual/social attitudes that fuel marijuana scares, and a kind of concentrated paternalism that makes state socialism look like mom 'n' pop free enterprise by comparison? And attempts by films like "Grass" to attack these kinds of topics is a high-risk game. When you tackle a subject which is, after all, a mental state, you risk appearing irrationally predisposed, but at the same time stand the chance of turning over a rock somewhere in our collective consciousness to find something that is true and illuminating. Which leads to the questions: Does "Grass" take these risks? Yes. Do these risks pay off in "Grass"? My answer: A qualified "maybe". Whether "Grass" succeeds or not isn't as important to me as the fact that it takes those risks. That's really how I feel. And, maybe, that willingness to put things out "on the line" is a kind of success in itself.
If you are a fan of edgy sonics and graphics and have an interest in U.S. anti-drug hysteria, take the time to watch this film. It'll teach you a *few* things you may not have known before. And its highlighting of the mounting national expense for the drug war (fiscal and social) *will* give you serious pause....
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Offizieller Standort
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- Marihuana
- Produktionsfirma
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
Box Office
- Bruttoertrag in den USA und Kanada
- 313.039 $
- Eröffnungswochenende in den USA und in Kanada
- 21.578 $
- 4. Juni 2000
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 313.039 $
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 20 Minuten
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.85 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen