Un professeur d'université d'âge mûr s'emballe pour une fillette de quatorze ans.Un professeur d'université d'âge mûr s'emballe pour une fillette de quatorze ans.Un professeur d'université d'âge mûr s'emballe pour une fillette de quatorze ans.
- Nommé pour 1 oscar
- 2 victoires et 9 nominations au total
Terry Kilburn
- Man
- (as Terence Kilburn)
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesPeter Sellers modeled the voice of his character Clare Quilty on that of his director, Stanley Kubrick.
- GaffesDirector Stanley Kubrick walks out of the very first interior shot (center to right bottom) of Humbert entering Quilty's house.
- Citations
Charlotte Haze: Do you believe in God?
Humbert Humbert: The question is does God believe in me?
- Générique farfeluThe credits are played over footage of Lolita's toenails being painted.
- Autres versionsThe scene where Lolita first "seduces" Humbert as he lies in the cot is a good 10 seconds longer in the British cut of the film. In the U.S. cut, the shot fades as she whispers the details of the "game" she played with Charlie at camp. In the U.K. print, the shot continues as Humbert mumbles that he's not familiar with the game. She then bends down again to whisper more details. Kubrick then cuts to a closer shot of Lolita's head as she says "Well, allrighty then" and then fades as she begins to descend to Humbert on the cot. The British cut of the film was used for the Region 1 DVD release.
- ConnexionsEdited into Hai-Kubrick (1999)
Commentaire en vedette
I'm going to say something that Kubrick fans and are not going to like. I think the 1997 remake of Lolita , directed by Adrian Lyne is a far superior film. Granted , i saw the remake first which may have had some influence but i am adamant it's a better film.
I'm not saying this version is bad , its not. In fact its really good but there are some real problems with it and they are mainly down to one person - Peter Sellers. His character Clare Quilty is so over the top . It's like there is a character from the Goon Show inserted into a serious drama and it feels wrong in every way. Why Kubrick felt this was necessary is beyond me. Frank Langella played Quilty in the remake and got it spot on. No childish voices or Pink Panther esq disguises.
James Mason is superb ( That Voice!) as is Shelley Winters and Sue Lyon who played Lolita. You have to admire Stanley Kubrick for making a film in 1962 with such a controversial subject . It was a brave thing to do. Sue Lyon plays the innocent ( or not so) teen brilliantly and i love the subtle looks she gives Humbert . The question is , is she encouraging him or is he just a sexual predator ?
Despite my thoughts on the remake being a better film , i still think this one of Kubrick's best.
I'm not saying this version is bad , its not. In fact its really good but there are some real problems with it and they are mainly down to one person - Peter Sellers. His character Clare Quilty is so over the top . It's like there is a character from the Goon Show inserted into a serious drama and it feels wrong in every way. Why Kubrick felt this was necessary is beyond me. Frank Langella played Quilty in the remake and got it spot on. No childish voices or Pink Panther esq disguises.
James Mason is superb ( That Voice!) as is Shelley Winters and Sue Lyon who played Lolita. You have to admire Stanley Kubrick for making a film in 1962 with such a controversial subject . It was a brave thing to do. Sue Lyon plays the innocent ( or not so) teen brilliantly and i love the subtle looks she gives Humbert . The question is , is she encouraging him or is he just a sexual predator ?
Despite my thoughts on the remake being a better film , i still think this one of Kubrick's best.
- valleyjohn
- 29 mai 2020
- Lien permanent
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
Détails
Box-office
- Budget
- 2 000 000 $ US (estimation)
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 7 411 $ US
- Durée2 heures 33 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 1.66 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant