IMDb RATING
6.2/10
3.9K
YOUR RATING
Englishmen race to find the tomb of Genghis Khan before the sinister Fu Manchu does.Englishmen race to find the tomb of Genghis Khan before the sinister Fu Manchu does.Englishmen race to find the tomb of Genghis Khan before the sinister Fu Manchu does.
- Awards
- 1 nomination total
Everett Brown
- Slave
- (uncredited)
Steve Clemente
- Knife Thrower
- (uncredited)
Willie Fung
- Ship's Steward
- (uncredited)
Ferdinand Gottschalk
- British Museum Official
- (uncredited)
Allen Jung
- Coolie
- (uncredited)
Tetsu Komai
- Swordsman
- (uncredited)
James B. Leong
- Guest
- (uncredited)
Oswald Marshall
- Undetermined Role
- (uncredited)
Chris-Pin Martin
- Potentate
- (uncredited)
Lal Chand Mehra
- Indian Prince
- (uncredited)
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaBoris Karloff actually wore a Chinese woman's wedding dress as costume.
- GoofsFu tortures Barton to obtain the whereabouts of Genghis Khan's mask and scimitar. Later on Fu is shown to have a serum that brainwashes people, so the torture of Barton was needless.
- Alternate versionsIn the 1970's, "Mask of Fu Manchu" was cut slightly (by about 2 minutes), removing references deemed particularly offensive to the Asian-American community (including several racial remarks and an extended version of the famous whipping scene). It is actually this cut version which MGM/UA released in the early 1990's on videotape, although the deleted segments were restored for the print of "Mask of Fu Manchu" used for the later laserdisc release "MGM Horror Classics," and the more recent DVD release.
- ConnectionsEdited into Mondo Lugosi - A Vampire's Scrapbook (1987)
Featured review
Many, many times a movie can be worthwhile when it does no more than create and display a strange world. Almost always that's the case where the world is new and/or synthesized from previous abstract sources.
"Metropolis" of five years earlier is often celebrated as a film. Its only value is in the art design, but that's miraculous in a way. Unfortunately the story is as thuggishly stupid as the notions it criticizes. And that mars a movie for me.
This one is even more clever in the visual world it creates. And yes the story is dumb, and also racist. But it is not hypocritical: all the people involved are dishonorable, worthy of a Tod Browning script.
The visual notions are astonishingly varied. Nominally this is a mystical Chinese (Northern Chinese, more deeply mystical) environment added to a 30's German-influenced visual depiction of science. There are lots of "electrical" visuals, zaps and blinkers. Abstractions of reality dominate: staircases that stand alone: monumental pedestals and other features in internal spaces; statues and icons that become characters from props.
The styles aren't Chinese at all but borrowed from any place or era with an association with the mystical.
Deep, deep shadows. Many ceremonial movements in everyday tasks (as well as ceremonies). Vast ambitions, though this was commonplace by then. Direct precode references to sex and the implication that somehow rape on a national scale had something to do with mystical/ scientific power.
(Remember, this is BEFORE Hitler's ascendancy.)
The story and most characters are irrelevant and that underscores the effect of the tone.
Watch Indiana Jones if you must, if you need movement. Watch this if you want to be saturated with cinematic color.
Ted's Evaluation -- 4 of 3: Every cineliterate person should experience this.
"Metropolis" of five years earlier is often celebrated as a film. Its only value is in the art design, but that's miraculous in a way. Unfortunately the story is as thuggishly stupid as the notions it criticizes. And that mars a movie for me.
This one is even more clever in the visual world it creates. And yes the story is dumb, and also racist. But it is not hypocritical: all the people involved are dishonorable, worthy of a Tod Browning script.
The visual notions are astonishingly varied. Nominally this is a mystical Chinese (Northern Chinese, more deeply mystical) environment added to a 30's German-influenced visual depiction of science. There are lots of "electrical" visuals, zaps and blinkers. Abstractions of reality dominate: staircases that stand alone: monumental pedestals and other features in internal spaces; statues and icons that become characters from props.
The styles aren't Chinese at all but borrowed from any place or era with an association with the mystical.
Deep, deep shadows. Many ceremonial movements in everyday tasks (as well as ceremonies). Vast ambitions, though this was commonplace by then. Direct precode references to sex and the implication that somehow rape on a national scale had something to do with mystical/ scientific power.
(Remember, this is BEFORE Hitler's ascendancy.)
The story and most characters are irrelevant and that underscores the effect of the tone.
Watch Indiana Jones if you must, if you need movement. Watch this if you want to be saturated with cinematic color.
Ted's Evaluation -- 4 of 3: Every cineliterate person should experience this.
- How long is The Mask of Fu Manchu?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- Gospodar Azije
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- $327,627 (estimated)
- Runtime1 hour 9 minutes
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.37 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content