IMDb RATING
7.6/10
1.3K
YOUR RATING
An underpaid middle-aged clerk finds a 'parash pathar', a stone that changes iron to gold on touch.An underpaid middle-aged clerk finds a 'parash pathar', a stone that changes iron to gold on touch.An underpaid middle-aged clerk finds a 'parash pathar', a stone that changes iron to gold on touch.
- Awards
- 1 nomination
Tulsi Chakraborty
- Paresh Chandra Dutta
- (as Tulsi Chakravarty)
Kali Bannerjee
- Priyotosh Henry Biswas
- (as Kali Bannerji)
Rani Bala
- Giribala Dutta
- (as Ranibala)
Storyline
Did you know
- ConnectionsReferenced in Degrassi: The Next Generation: Don't Dream It's Over (2004)
Featured review
I am an ardent Ray fan and I till now I have seen 14 of his movies and loved 13 of them. Only one that I didn't love is Parash Pathar.
Satyajit Ray is my favorite filmmaker and all of his movies are master pieces. It is hard to find a fault in any of his movies. Acting is always very good, yet subtle. Background score is never over the top. There is no cheap melodrama and the viewer is encouraged to make his own conclusions. Even a minor actor not acting up to par has a jarring effect. It is like watching a blemish on an extraordinary piece of art.
So I was quite surprised by this movie, as the lead character Paresh Chandra Dutt was overacting a lot. So were some other actors. While in almost all Ray's movies characters are very real here they are caricatures instead and there is no subtlety to be found. Also the story never took an unexpected turn, it is another morality tale centered around philosopher's's stone. Though you can find Ray's touches here and there, there are not enough of them to save the film.
Though it a good film when compared with other Indian films of the same period, it doesn't in any way compares with Ray's other movies. I would recommend it only to Ray's die hard fans like me. Though I didn't really liked the movie I didn't consider it a waste of time either.
Satyajit Ray is my favorite filmmaker and all of his movies are master pieces. It is hard to find a fault in any of his movies. Acting is always very good, yet subtle. Background score is never over the top. There is no cheap melodrama and the viewer is encouraged to make his own conclusions. Even a minor actor not acting up to par has a jarring effect. It is like watching a blemish on an extraordinary piece of art.
So I was quite surprised by this movie, as the lead character Paresh Chandra Dutt was overacting a lot. So were some other actors. While in almost all Ray's movies characters are very real here they are caricatures instead and there is no subtlety to be found. Also the story never took an unexpected turn, it is another morality tale centered around philosopher's's stone. Though you can find Ray's touches here and there, there are not enough of them to save the film.
Though it a good film when compared with other Indian films of the same period, it doesn't in any way compares with Ray's other movies. I would recommend it only to Ray's die hard fans like me. Though I didn't really liked the movie I didn't consider it a waste of time either.
- princebansal1982
- Feb 24, 2013
- Permalink
Details
- Runtime1 hour 51 minutes
- Color
- Sound mix
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
Top Gap
By what name was The Philosopher's Stone (1958) officially released in Canada in English?
Answer