A man meets a clone of himself and stumbles into a grand conspiracy about clones taking over the world.A man meets a clone of himself and stumbles into a grand conspiracy about clones taking over the world.A man meets a clone of himself and stumbles into a grand conspiracy about clones taking over the world.
- Awards
- 8 nominations
Rodney Rowland
- P. Wiley
- (as Rod Rowland)
Taylor Reid
- Clara Gibson
- (as Taylor Anne Reid)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaThe intro to the film gives us a history of breakthroughs in cloning tech. There is an entry on the cloning of a sheep, which is credited to "Two pioneering scientists Drs. Lerrad Yarg and Phillip Slanigan, both of the Rosaritio Institute." In real life, the two pioneering scientists were Keith Campbell and Ian Wilmut, of the Roslin Institute in Scotland. The year was 1996, not 1997. The name of the sheep, 'Dolly', is correct. Dolly lived until 2003, having been euthanized due to lung disease and severe arthritis, which were said to be unrelated to the cloning process.
- GoofsWhen Adam lands his whisper craft on the roof of the building, a security guard comes out to stop him. Adam provides his clearance to be there by presenting him with the contract he signed earlier in the movie. When the guard looks at it, you can clearly see that none of the lines are filled out.
- Quotes
Adam Gibson: [1:33:22] If you really believe that then you should clone yourself while you're still alive.
Drucker: Why is that? So I can understand your unique perspective?
Adam Gibson: No. So you can go fuck yourself!
- Crazy creditsOn the Region 1 DVD release, in "The Future Is Coming" making-of featurette, a member of the production crew (Nancy Tate) is credited as a "Cloned Consultant".
- Alternate versionsOn the Region 6 China DVD by Excel Media, the flirting scene is cut.
- SoundtracksHappy Birthday to You
Written by Mildred J. Hill and Patty S. Hill
Featured review
I was pleasantly surprised with how good the not very favorably reviewed 6th day was. It delivered in several ways:
That is quite impressive if you ask me.
However, sometimes it fails on two points: Predictability and suspense. Some scenes, especially involving the bad guy, are so embarrassingly predictable that it makes me wish they could have skipped some clichés just for once. And the movie misses great suspense opportunities on several occasions. I won't tell you how, who or when, but when a guy is assassinated, it should not happen just out of the blue, but we should be led into the situation slowly (for example from the assassin's point of view) so we get the chance to worry about it. That opportunity is missed at least twice, when the movie jumps straight into the kill, giving us momentary cheap shock instead of thrill. Compare it to the killing in, for example, Predator (one of the most excellent Arnold movies). Most kills by the Predator don't come out of the blue, we are warned, and it adds suspense and thrill.
Those flaws push the movie down from the top marks, but I still rank it pretty high for the points mentioned above. Quite entertaining and even interesting too, which makes it one of the better Arnold movies. Recommended!
- It has the expected action, stunts, effects.
- It has the expected one-liners and humor.
- Acting is generally perfectly adequate for the purpose. Rather, it must be pretty good when I never was disturbed by any bad acting.
- It is nicely futuristic in a near-future fashion with many perfectly or partially believable ideas (and some that we don't quite believe in, but hey, if we accept hyperspace travel then we can accept this).
- It has a message that actually keeps us thinking after leaving the movie. The cloning problem is considered from many points of view (not only as the bad guy's evil plan). How far can we heal, how far can we preserve life, when does it become an ethical problem, when will it clash with religion?
That is quite impressive if you ask me.
However, sometimes it fails on two points: Predictability and suspense. Some scenes, especially involving the bad guy, are so embarrassingly predictable that it makes me wish they could have skipped some clichés just for once. And the movie misses great suspense opportunities on several occasions. I won't tell you how, who or when, but when a guy is assassinated, it should not happen just out of the blue, but we should be led into the situation slowly (for example from the assassin's point of view) so we get the chance to worry about it. That opportunity is missed at least twice, when the movie jumps straight into the kill, giving us momentary cheap shock instead of thrill. Compare it to the killing in, for example, Predator (one of the most excellent Arnold movies). Most kills by the Predator don't come out of the blue, we are warned, and it adds suspense and thrill.
Those flaws push the movie down from the top marks, but I still rank it pretty high for the points mentioned above. Quite entertaining and even interesting too, which makes it one of the better Arnold movies. Recommended!
The Amazing Arnold
The Amazing Arnold
Whether he's bodybuilding in the gym or obliterating baddies on screen, Arnold Schwarzenegger has been delighting audiences for decades. Take a look at some of the amazing moments in his career so far.
- How long is The 6th Day?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official sites
- Language
- Also known as
- On the Sixth Day
- Filming locations
- Cleveland Dam, Capilano River Regional Park, North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada(where Cadillac goes over top of dam.)
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- $82,000,000 (estimated)
- Gross US & Canada
- $34,604,280
- Opening weekend US & Canada
- $13,020,883
- Nov 19, 2000
- Gross worldwide
- $96,085,477
- Runtime2 hours 3 minutes
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 2.39 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content