Elle Woods heads to Washington, D.C. to join the staff of a Representative in order to pass a bill to ban animal testing.Elle Woods heads to Washington, D.C. to join the staff of a Representative in order to pass a bill to ban animal testing.Elle Woods heads to Washington, D.C. to join the staff of a Representative in order to pass a bill to ban animal testing.
- Awards
- 3 wins & 5 nominations
Gregorio
- Mailroom Guy
- (as Zia Harris)
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaReese Witherspoon was pregnant during filming.
- GoofsIn Legally Blonde (2001), Elle graduates from Law School in 2004, yet in this movie they make several references to the fact that it is 2003.
- ConnectionsFeatured in Wheel of Fortune: Wheel Goes to the Movies 3 (2003)
- SoundtracksMe Against the World
Written by Max Hsu, Matt Dally and Tricia Brock
Performed by Superchick (as Superchic[k])
Courtesy of InPop Records
Under license from InPop Records, Inc.
Featured review
I loved the original Legally Blonde, and I knew going into this movie that it wouldn't be as good as the original. My only solace lies in the thought that this could have been so much worse than it was.
First, LB2 relied too much on the Elle-Woods-Fish-Out-Of-Water plot. It should have portrayed the main character as being savvy enough to take advantage of the fact that her opponents always underestimated her. After all, she's been out of law school a couple of years already, surely she'd have learned that much, right?
Second, the plot itself was too contrived. There wasn't a single believable character in the show, and Witherspoon was just a caricature of the original movie's heroine.
But I still managed to enjoy most of the show. I even chuckled in a couple of scenes. But I winced at far too many other scenes, and the climactic speech to Congress was abominable.
I've seen worse remakes than this, but I think the producers missed an opportunity to make a good film instead of a knock-off.
First, LB2 relied too much on the Elle-Woods-Fish-Out-Of-Water plot. It should have portrayed the main character as being savvy enough to take advantage of the fact that her opponents always underestimated her. After all, she's been out of law school a couple of years already, surely she'd have learned that much, right?
Second, the plot itself was too contrived. There wasn't a single believable character in the show, and Witherspoon was just a caricature of the original movie's heroine.
But I still managed to enjoy most of the show. I even chuckled in a couple of scenes. But I winced at far too many other scenes, and the climactic speech to Congress was abominable.
I've seen worse remakes than this, but I think the producers missed an opportunity to make a good film instead of a knock-off.
- SteverinoAlaReno
- Jul 6, 2003
- Permalink
Details
Box office
- Budget
- $45,000,000 (estimated)
- Gross US & Canada
- $90,186,328
- Opening weekend US & Canada
- $22,220,670
- Jul 6, 2003
- Gross worldwide
- $124,914,842
- Runtime1 hour 35 minutes
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.85 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
Top Gap
What was the official certification given to Legally Blonde 2: Red, White & Blonde (2003) in Spain?
Answer