miaalike
Joined Feb 2021
Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Reviews138
miaalike's rating
Stop giving money and decisions to evil doers or psychopaths - I followed the movie and several "notes" sounded so out of place, so fake, that I thought "they must have taken a meaningful story and put it into a film, with the wrong people in charge of the operation".
I was right, the seemingly small alterations.make.huge differences and take the story into a whole different direction.
Starting with changing the caracter's name, then with implying the woman is infertile, then simply the "eye" through which the tales are presented. It is one thing to observe the oriental debauchery and decadence with no emotional take part in it, and another to lavish in a gross depiction of said traits, which plagued and crashed empire after empire.
The same element can be natural and in place or it can be smeared by a sick approach.
Why do they try to misrepresent literature works, history elements and many other things, from natural into bleurgh?!
Get other people to understand stories properly and not ruin them with their approach! All the decorum and the actors efforts, for.nothing!
I was right, the seemingly small alterations.make.huge differences and take the story into a whole different direction.
Starting with changing the caracter's name, then with implying the woman is infertile, then simply the "eye" through which the tales are presented. It is one thing to observe the oriental debauchery and decadence with no emotional take part in it, and another to lavish in a gross depiction of said traits, which plagued and crashed empire after empire.
The same element can be natural and in place or it can be smeared by a sick approach.
Why do they try to misrepresent literature works, history elements and many other things, from natural into bleurgh?!
Get other people to understand stories properly and not ruin them with their approach! All the decorum and the actors efforts, for.nothing!
Can Netflix stop turning into rubbish everything it touches?
Rowan Atkinson had his unique brand of physical humour, with the Mr. Bean character.
Went a bit over the edge by associating himself with royalty, aka old power... decoration, Olympics feature and all.
What is he doing on the fake woke channel Netflix? I say fake, because it seems to take even good ideas and drag them into dirt. It is, if you want, a "how to dismantle" various things production house. From actors, to ideas, to series, to stand up comedians, everything just becomes hardly watchable. Not hating it, just noticing it.
Moving past this, Mr Bean was so boring in this new installment, however watchable - until the dog poo bit. Just gross! And so not Mr Bean, the geek who does stupid things, but manages to stay within decent limits. Yuck!
Rowan Atkinson had his unique brand of physical humour, with the Mr. Bean character.
Went a bit over the edge by associating himself with royalty, aka old power... decoration, Olympics feature and all.
What is he doing on the fake woke channel Netflix? I say fake, because it seems to take even good ideas and drag them into dirt. It is, if you want, a "how to dismantle" various things production house. From actors, to ideas, to series, to stand up comedians, everything just becomes hardly watchable. Not hating it, just noticing it.
Moving past this, Mr Bean was so boring in this new installment, however watchable - until the dog poo bit. Just gross! And so not Mr Bean, the geek who does stupid things, but manages to stay within decent limits. Yuck!
This movie is like the garbage bin from the back of the Mall foudcourt - you find in it, stuffed and partially chewed, pieces of Wandavision, Dr. Strange, Army of the Dead, Ghostbusters, even some Matrix images, 2 actors currently working under Kurtzman, Star Trek crumbs, Maleficent visuals, Fringe elements, a random Japanese landscape, some mangled Everything Everywhere All At Once ideas,and the list may go on. All on top of the other, not like referrences, nooo -.but as if someone's mind is a hoarder and finally tried to make some spring cleaning... as I said, the trash layering or chaotic mix is the general impression.
Who messed this up so bad? The lines are lame, were they written by some AI? The same one that messed up the latest Dr Who, the new Orville and Star Trek Strange New Worlds? What is going on with this weak scripts and - understandably, after all - poor lines delivery?
Superhero movies from marvel felt right, this doesn't. When their plots tap into pattern from mythology, reality and science, they click and remain anchored in something we feel authentic. Dr. Strange here is as if someone wanted to destroy that, like tear ut down, harbouring a secret hatred against superhero movies.
And no way did I want to see another Army of the Dead installation, with Marvel characters, did nobody check this movie before giving it the OK?! Like, who said, let'a mash up old things, throw in some Marvel bits and bibs and we'll be fine? Is Sam Raimi still functional, or are his wires crossed ,he forgot he alreafy did the same things - the cursed book, the zombies, the whacky one liners, the outbof nowhere character showups?
The young superhero - blatantly named America (I mean, c'mon! "America has to be saved" ), is structured in a haste, almost schematic, with some emotional elements glued onto a cardboard structure, sap story, ride the diversity wave, wham bam thabk you ma'am... what IS this? Testing how blinded and stupid the public has become?! There ia a strong need for pushing back, or else we'll end up with only this type of productions, that check various elements from a key list, put some filling in and feel like a plate of spam! This is not video SEO, it is suppossed to be a movie! The way it fails as a movie serves in mocking whatever elements it checked on that list...
Go see it, as an example of what it should not have been.
Who messed this up so bad? The lines are lame, were they written by some AI? The same one that messed up the latest Dr Who, the new Orville and Star Trek Strange New Worlds? What is going on with this weak scripts and - understandably, after all - poor lines delivery?
Superhero movies from marvel felt right, this doesn't. When their plots tap into pattern from mythology, reality and science, they click and remain anchored in something we feel authentic. Dr. Strange here is as if someone wanted to destroy that, like tear ut down, harbouring a secret hatred against superhero movies.
And no way did I want to see another Army of the Dead installation, with Marvel characters, did nobody check this movie before giving it the OK?! Like, who said, let'a mash up old things, throw in some Marvel bits and bibs and we'll be fine? Is Sam Raimi still functional, or are his wires crossed ,he forgot he alreafy did the same things - the cursed book, the zombies, the whacky one liners, the outbof nowhere character showups?
The young superhero - blatantly named America (I mean, c'mon! "America has to be saved" ), is structured in a haste, almost schematic, with some emotional elements glued onto a cardboard structure, sap story, ride the diversity wave, wham bam thabk you ma'am... what IS this? Testing how blinded and stupid the public has become?! There ia a strong need for pushing back, or else we'll end up with only this type of productions, that check various elements from a key list, put some filling in and feel like a plate of spam! This is not video SEO, it is suppossed to be a movie! The way it fails as a movie serves in mocking whatever elements it checked on that list...
Go see it, as an example of what it should not have been.