robinparker311
Joined Aug 2014
Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Reviews30
robinparker311's rating
I truly don't understand the number of people that I have compared this to Euphoria & at the same time criticized for supposedly 'copying' that show, when the only real things that this show has in common with Euphoria are a black & queer/bisexual protagonist (who also happens to be a teenager).
There is the addiction issue, which many will say is a form of addiction (and I don't fully disagree w that premise) but otherwise, there is nothing other than these superficial character traits that the show has in common with Euphoria.
It seems more to me that many viewers are unable to see beyond the surface & will only see Mia's character & think "she's black & she's queer, this is just like Euphoria" when, in actuality, this show is very unlike Euphoria in many many ways.
I don't want to put spoilers in here, so I won't get too far into her character, but it seems to me that (especially these days & particularly in the US & the UK) all people want to look at are the superficial/outward qualities of someone and/or their personality & dismiss it as the most important thing about said character(s).
Can't people get past the fact that teenagers have always had complications in their lives & have always had emotional struggles, while the color of their skin & who they find attractive is the furthest thing from what you would call a character description?
People comparing this to Euphoria are clearly not looking beyond the fact that Mia is black & queer when giving this show bad reviews, claiming it is a copy.
I just wish people would see other people, whether it is an everyday life or in movies/television as who they really are, and that there is much more to people than simply their sexual history/preference & skin color.
I guess that's clearly just too much to ask of a 2023 television viewing audience.
There is the addiction issue, which many will say is a form of addiction (and I don't fully disagree w that premise) but otherwise, there is nothing other than these superficial character traits that the show has in common with Euphoria.
It seems more to me that many viewers are unable to see beyond the surface & will only see Mia's character & think "she's black & she's queer, this is just like Euphoria" when, in actuality, this show is very unlike Euphoria in many many ways.
I don't want to put spoilers in here, so I won't get too far into her character, but it seems to me that (especially these days & particularly in the US & the UK) all people want to look at are the superficial/outward qualities of someone and/or their personality & dismiss it as the most important thing about said character(s).
Can't people get past the fact that teenagers have always had complications in their lives & have always had emotional struggles, while the color of their skin & who they find attractive is the furthest thing from what you would call a character description?
People comparing this to Euphoria are clearly not looking beyond the fact that Mia is black & queer when giving this show bad reviews, claiming it is a copy.
I just wish people would see other people, whether it is an everyday life or in movies/television as who they really are, and that there is much more to people than simply their sexual history/preference & skin color.
I guess that's clearly just too much to ask of a 2023 television viewing audience.
OK, so this may not be 'Succession' level quality, but it is so much fun. It definitely has a very Amy Sherman Palladino (OK and the husband Daniel) feel about it which is straight up fun, let's face it.
I don't know for sure how I missed this show for so many years, but wound up home sick w strep throat & wanting something new, light & fun (yes, that word again) & this completely fits the bill.
Give it 2-3 episode before you decide that it's just silly (it is) & you will become fully invested in the characters, the feel of the show & personally, I can almost promise that you will enjoy yourself.
It may be a bit of a 'chick show' (in the way Gilmore Girls was), but I just decided about 5 episodes in that I couldn't have found something more perfect to do for a few days while stuck at home sick.
Enjoy.
I don't know for sure how I missed this show for so many years, but wound up home sick w strep throat & wanting something new, light & fun (yes, that word again) & this completely fits the bill.
Give it 2-3 episode before you decide that it's just silly (it is) & you will become fully invested in the characters, the feel of the show & personally, I can almost promise that you will enjoy yourself.
It may be a bit of a 'chick show' (in the way Gilmore Girls was), but I just decided about 5 episodes in that I couldn't have found something more perfect to do for a few days while stuck at home sick.
Enjoy.
I agree w both of the (only 2) other reviewers here. There could be a fantastic story, but it is so wide-open, something that really hasn't been done before & it's truly COMPLETELY impossible to know where they are going w this.
It's impossible to know who are the good guy(s) (girls/woman/women/machines) and/or who are the bad guy(s) here & that's really refreshing.
One thing is certain - you are not going to predict anything from the first cpl episodes.
By the middle of the 3rd there are still questions as to who is who, what they are trying to do & whether or not anyone is who they say they are. Very VERY interesting & I feel that it deserves the 7/10 if it for no other reason because of the acting. Betty Gilpin is (as usual) FANTASTIC & absolutely perfect for this role.
I'm curious to see what kind of written reviews there will be after everyone has had time to see the first few episodes.
I say go for it, let's see how the chips fall - if nothing else, it's definitely different.
It's impossible to know who are the good guy(s) (girls/woman/women/machines) and/or who are the bad guy(s) here & that's really refreshing.
One thing is certain - you are not going to predict anything from the first cpl episodes.
By the middle of the 3rd there are still questions as to who is who, what they are trying to do & whether or not anyone is who they say they are. Very VERY interesting & I feel that it deserves the 7/10 if it for no other reason because of the acting. Betty Gilpin is (as usual) FANTASTIC & absolutely perfect for this role.
I'm curious to see what kind of written reviews there will be after everyone has had time to see the first few episodes.
I say go for it, let's see how the chips fall - if nothing else, it's definitely different.