Distributed Acoustic Sensing for Monitoring Linear Infrastructures: Current Status and Trends
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS)
2.1. Sensing Principles
2.2. Sensing Performance
2.3. Installation and Layout of Fiber-Optic Cables
3. Applications of DAS in Linear Infrastructure Monitoring
3.1. Railway Safety Monitoring
3.1.1. Train Positioning and Speed Monitoring
3.1.2. Rail Track Health Monitoring
3.1.3. Roadbed Velocity Structure Imaging
3.2. Highway Traffic Monitoring
3.3. Pipeline Safety Monitoring
3.3.1. Pipeline Intrusion Detection
3.3.2. Pipeline Leakage Monitoring
3.4. Tunnel Structure Health Monitoring
3.5. Border Security Monitoring
3.6. Other Applications
4. Challenges and Future Trends
4.1. Challenges
- Directional sensitivity. Compared to three-component vibration detection devices (seismometers, accelerometers, etc.), DAS only has sensitivity along the axial direction of fiber-optic cables. DAS is highly sensitive to longitudinal waves propagating along fibers and to transverse waves propagating at 45° to fibers. It is only weakly sensitive to broadside waves [9]. In addition, when seismic wavelengths are close to the gauge length, the directional sensitivity of DAS becomes more complex [103,104];
- Complex amplitude responses. The absolute amplitude information from DAS signals is essential to amplitude-based studies, such as attenuation analysis, source inversion, and subsurface imaging [17]. However, DAS amplitude responses are complex. Previous studies have shown that the factors affecting DAS amplitude responses include gauge length [94], cable structure (e.g., tight-buffered versus loose-tube) [29], field deployment method (e.g., direct burial versus conduit embedding) [105], initial strain state [106], and near-surface geological conditions [107]. These complex amplitude responses cause trouble for practitioners when analyzing and interpreting data, which limits the further application of DAS to a certain extent;
- Sensing distance and spatial resolution. The sensing distance and spatial resolution of DAS are closely related to pulse width. The shorter the pulse width, the higher the spatial resolution but the shorter the sensing distance. That means that there is a contradiction between the sensing distance and the spatial resolution. For linear infrastructure monitoring (such as crack detection in railway tracks, micro-crack detection in large infrastructures, border intrusion location, etc.), we expect DAS to have a higher spatial resolution (at the cm level) and longer sensing distances (hundreds of km). Recently, researchers have carried out numerous investigations into overcoming this challenge. For instance, Lu et al. achieved a spatial resolution of 30 cm, a sensing distance of 19.8 km, and a vibration sensing signal-to-noise ratio of 10 dB using the optic swept pulse method [108].
- Spatial positioning of fiber-optic cables. The spatial position of each sensing channel of fiber-optic cables is a piece of important information that investigators must consider when analyzing DAS data. Investigators need to perform tap tests to obtain the corresponding relationships between the spatial positions of fiber-optic cables and sensing channels. For cases that need to deploy fiber-optic cables on site, investigators can accurately obtain the spatial locations of fiber-optic cables (especially the locations of redundant sections). However, when using existing fiber-optic cables for monitoring (such as communication fiber-optic cables near railway tracks and underground communication fiber-optic cables under urban roads), it is very difficult to obtain the accurate spatial location information of the fiber-optic cables. Because investigators cannot obtain detailed information about the layout conditions of existing fiber-optic cables (the layout of fiber-optic cables is not always in ideal straight lines, there can be many redundant cables, and the cables may twist at some positions), they can only verify the information through a large number of tap tests to obtain the general spatial layout of the fiber-optic cables, which is very time-consuming and laborious;
- Deformation coupling. For linear infrastructures with large spans, it is a challenge to ensure that fiber-optic cables always maintain valid coupling conditions with the engineering structures or the ground. When the coupling between fiber-optic cables and their surroundings is weak, the transmission effects of strain and vibrations are greatly affected, thereby decreasing the signal-to-noise ratio of the recorded data. Many field tests have fully proven this point [109,110]. In recent years, many researchers have carried out a lot of research works on cable–soil deformation coupling. The results of laboratory experiments have demonstrated that the structures of fiber-optic cables affect the interaction and strain transfer between fiber-optic cables and soil, thereby affecting the quality of the monitoring data [40,111]. Although a lot of valuable works on cable–soil deformation coupling have been carried out, in view of the complex coupling mechanism and the changeable application environments during vibrations, deformation coupling between fiber-optic cables and their surroundings needs to be further explored in the future;
- Data storage, transmission, and processing. Since each sensing unit on cables collects information at a high frequency, the records are very large. The amount of information collected by tens of kilometers of fiber-optic cables in a day can even reach the TB level. These massive amounts of data make storage, transmission, and processing complex and time-consuming tasks. In terms of data storage, some DAS manufacturers provide filtering and compression systems that can reduce the number of records. However, some valuable records can be lost after compression. In terms of transmission, few wireless network platforms support the transmission of DAS records, so records are generally transmitted through hard disks and other methods. In terms of processing, although artificial intelligence algorithms can improve processing speeds, in the face of TB-level amounts of monitoring data, the speed of data processing still needs to be improved. In addition, jointly analyzing DAS data and other monitoring data (DTS data, geophone data, etc.) is also a big challenge.
4.2. Future Trends
- Improvements in the performance of DAS systems (sensitivity, spatial resolution, sensing distance, frequency response range, etc.). In order to expand the application potential of DAS and improve its monitoring capabilities in complex and harsh environments, it is necessary to improve the monitoring performance of DAS systems. For instance, improving the spatial resolution (cm level) could not only increase the equivalent sensing channel of DAS but also expand the maximum strain/vibration range [112]. Expanding the frequency response range (MHz level) could make DAS applicable in the field of the nondestructive detection of engineering structures [113]. Increasing the sensing distance (hundreds of km) could provide DAS with more advantages in the fields of pipeline, railway, and border monitoring. In recent years, investigators have carried out many studies on this topic. For instance, in order to improve the sensitivity of DAS, investigators have proposed fading suppression [114] and laser phase-noise compensation techniques [115,116], as shown in Table 4. These techniques allow DAS the sensitivity to detect nano-strains. Investigators have also proposed that the sensitivity of the DAS could be increased (up to 2.2 times) by building coils inside sensing cables, which has been verified by field experiments [117]. In addition, the design of special fiber-optic cables is also regarded as an essential measure to improve the detection capability of DAS. Table 5 shows several specially designed fiber-optic cables and their performance. In terms of sensing distance, as far as we know, the longest distance is 175 km. It is believed that with the continued deepening of research in the future, the monitoring performance of DAS will be further improved;Table 4. Comparison of various fiber-optic sensing techniques [118].
Year Method/Technique Sensitivity Reference 2018 Chirped pulse Phi-OTDR with phase-noise compensation [115] 2019 Pulse compression with
phase-noise compensation[116] Table 5. Performance summary of CSE and DSE fibers [93].Fabrication Method SNR Enhancement
(dB)Sensing Distance
(km)CSE fibers Continuously inscribe Bragg gratings 15 1 Highly doped fibers 14 1.9 DSE fibers UV exposure 5.5–21.1 50 Femtosecond laser inscription 13–15.8 9.8 - Breakthrough of the directional sensitivity limit. In response to the directional sensitivity of DAS, many research teams have proposed designs for the structures of fiber-optic cables (such as spirally winding fiber-optic cables) to meet the needs of multi-component measurements [119,120,121,122]. For instance, Hornman et al. designed a helically wound fiber-optic cable. They spirally wound the cable at a certain angle to obtain vibration signals at different angles. They found that when the cable is wound at an angle of 30°, the cable almost has the same sensitivity to vibrational waves in all directions [121]. On this basis, Lim and Save proposed an acquisition system using five equally spaced helical fibers and a straight fiber to obtain six different strain projections, which reconstructs all components of 3D strain tensors at any location along fiber-optic cables [122]. They verified the feasibility of the method through numerical simulations. In addition, optimizing the geometric layout of fiber-optic cables is also regarded as a measure that could improve the directional sensitivity of DAS. By designing alternative geometric layouts for fiber-optic cables (such as umbrella and checkerboard layouts) [123], the vibration signals from multiple directions can be captured to obtain more comprehensive vibration information and improve the directional sensitivity of DAS;
- Development of data processing software and risk assessment systems. In recent years, a series of computational intelligence technologies, including fuzzy logic, genetic algorithms, wavelet analysis, machine learning, and deep learning, have developed rapidly. These computing algorithms provide the possibility for the efficient and diversified processing of DAS data. At the same time, these intelligent technologies can also help researchers and practitioners to mine more potential information, thereby helping researchers and practitioners to conduct scientific research. The establishment of risk assessment systems will help management departments to grasp the health status of linear infrastructures in a timely manner. If key detected parameters exceed the predetermined thresholds, the risk assessment systems will promptly notify the management departments through SMS, email, etc., and the management departments can take corresponding emergency measures to avoid major personnel and property losses;
- Establishment of a large-capacity network data sharing platform. The establishment of a data sharing platform could not only effectively relieve the pressure of data transmission but also allow more researchers and practitioners to conduct scientific explorations using shared DAS data, thereby promoting the development of DAS;
- Preparation of guidelines to improve standardization in field monitoring. With the increasing number of engineering practices, there is an urgent need for countries and regions to develop relevant standards, norms, and guidelines to implement monitoring. In recent years, experts and scholars from all over the world have successively published several guides for the field of DFOS. However, specifications and guides for the application of DAS in the field of linear infrastructure monitoring are still lacking and need to be complied by experts and scholars to enable standardized engineering monitoring;
- Breakthrough the technical bottleneck for interrogation units. Although sensing cables are cheap, interrogation units are expensive. The price of a DAS interrogation unit is nearly RMB one million, which limits the application and promotion of DAS to a certain extent. We urgently need to break through the technical difficulties and reduce the production costs of equipment, thereby allowing the large-scale promotion and application of DAS.
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Dadfar, B.; El Naggar, M.H.; Nastev, M. Quantifying exposure of linear infrastructures to earthquake-triggered transverse landslides in permafrost thawing slopes. Can. Geotech. J. 2017, 54, 1002–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Geertsema, M.; Schwab, J.; Blais-Stevens, A.; Sakals, M. Landslides impacting linear infrastructure in west central British Columbia. Nat. Hazards 2009, 48, 59–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quinn, P.; Hutchinson, D.; Diederichs, M.; Rowe, R. Regional-scale landslide susceptibility mapping using the weights of evidence method: An example applied to linear infrastructure. Can. Geotech. J. 2010, 47, 905–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harvey, R.R.; McBean, E.A. Comparing the utility of decision trees and support vector machines when planning inspections of linear sewer infrastructure. J. Hydroinform. 2014, 16, 1265–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Infante, D.; Di Martire, D.; Calcaterra, D.; Miele, P.; Scotto di Santolo, A.; Ramondini, M. Integrated procedure for monitoring and assessment of linear infrastructures safety (I-Pro MONALISA) affected by slope instability. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 5535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhang, L.; Sun, Q.; Hu, J. Potential of TCPInSAR in monitoring linear infrastructure with a small dataset of SAR images: Application of the Donghai Bridge, China. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mills, S.J.; Ford, J.J.; Mejías, L. Vision based control for fixed wing UAVs inspecting locally linear infrastructure using skid-to-turn maneuvers. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 2011, 61, 29–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dunnicliff, J. Geotechnical Instrumentation for Monitoring Field Performance; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Zhan, Z. Distributed acoustic sensing turns fiber-optic cables into sensitive seismic antennas. Seismol. Res. Lett. 2020, 91, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lellouch, A.; Biondi, B.L. Seismic applications of downhole DAS. Sensors 2021, 21, 2897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Molenaar, M.M.; Hill, D.; Webster, P.; Fidan, E.; Birch, B. First downhole application of distributed acoustic sensing for hydraulic-fracturing monitoring and diagnostics. SPE Drill. Complet. 2012, 27, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kobayashi, Y.; Uematsu, Y.; Mochiji, S.; Xue, Z. A field experiment of walkaway distributed acoustic sensing vertical seismic profile in a deep and deviated onshore well in Japan using a fibre optic cable deployed inside coiled tubing. Geophys. Prospect. 2020, 68, 501–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Byerley, G.; Monk, D.; Aaron, P.; Yates, M. Time-lapse seismic monitoring of individual hydraulic frac stages using a downhole DAS array. Lead. Edge 2018, 37, 802–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karrenbach, M.; Kahn, D.; Cole, S.; Ridge, A.; Boone, K.; Rich, J.; Silver, K.; Langton, D. Hydraulic-fracturing-induced strain and microseismic using in situ distributed fiber-optic sensing. Lead. Edge 2017, 36, 837–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L.; Tan, J.; Wood, D.A.; Zhao, Z.; Becker, D.; Lyu, Q.; Shu, B.; Chen, H. A review of the current status of induced seismicity monitoring for hydraulic fracturing in unconventional tight oil and gas reservoirs. Fuel 2019, 242, 195–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lindsey, N.J.; Martin, E.R. Fiber-optic seismology. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 2021, 49, 309–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lindsey, N.J.; Martin, E.R.; Dreger, D.S.; Freifeld, B.; Cole, S.; James, S.R.; Biondi, B.L.; Ajo-Franklin, J.B. Fiber-optic network observations of earthquake wavefields. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2017, 44, 11792–11799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shi, B.; Wang, B.; Zhang, C.; Gu, K.; Ruan, Y.; Li, G.; Wang, Q.; Wei, G.; Zhang, D.; Zhu, H.-H.; et al. Multi-physical distributed fiber optic observation in a 3211-m-deep scientific borehole at Jiajika lithium mine, western Sichuan. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2022, 67, 2719–2726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daley, T.M.; Freifeld, B.M.; Ajo-Franklin, J.; Dou, S.; Pevzner, R.; Shulakova, V.; Kashikar, S.; Miller, D.E.; Goetz, J.; Henninges, J. Field testing of fiber-optic distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) for subsurface seismic monitoring. Lead. Edge 2013, 32, 699–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dou, S.; Lindsey, N.; Wagner, A.M.; Daley, T.M.; Freifeld, B.; Robertson, M.; Peterson, J.; Ulrich, C.; Martin, E.R.; Ajo-Franklin, J.B. Distributed acoustic sensing for seismic monitoring of the near Ssurface: A traffic-noise interferometry case study. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 11620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zeng, X.; Lancelle, C.; Thurber, C.; Fratta, D.; Wang, H.; Lord, N.; Chalari, A.; Clarke, A. Properties of noise cross-correlation functions obtained from a distributed acoustic sensing array at Garner Valley, California. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer. 2017, 107, 603–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Franciscangelis, C.; Margulis, W.; Kjellberg, L.; Soderquist, I.; Fruett, F. Real-time distributed fiber microphone based on phase-OTDR. Opt. Express 2016, 24, 29597–29602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tomboza, W.; Guerrier, S.; Awwad, E.; Dorize, C. High sensitivity differential phase OTDR for acoustic signals detection. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2021, 33, 645–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caruso, F.; Dong, L.; Lin, M.; Liu, M.; Gong, Z.; Xu, W.; Alonge, G.; Li, S. Monitoring of a nearshore small dolphin species using passive acoustic platforms and supervised machine learning techniques. Front. Mar. Sci. 2020, 7, 267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, B.; Mao, Y.; Ashry, I.; Al-Fehaid, Y.; Al-Shawaf, A.; Ng, T.K.; Yu, C.; Ooi, B.S. Towards detecting red palm weevil using machine learning and fiber optic distributed acoustic sensing. Sensors 2021, 21, 1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lindsey, N.J.; Dawe, T.C.; Ajo-Franklin, J.B. Illuminating seafloor faults and ocean dynamics with dark fiber distributed acoustic sensing. Science 2019, 366, 1103–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williams, E.F.; Fernandez-Ruiz, M.R.; Magalhaes, R.; Vanthillo, R.; Zhan, Z.; Gonzalez-Herraez, M.; Martins, H.F. Distributed sensing of microseisms and teleseisms with submarine dark fibers. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 5778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jousset, P.; Reinsch, T.; Ryberg, T.; Blanck, H.; Clarke, A.; Aghayev, R.; Hersir, G.P.; Henninges, J.; Weber, M.; Krawczyk, C.M. Dynamic strain determination using fibre-optic cables allows imaging of seismological and structural features. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Walter, F.; Graeff, D.; Lindner, F.; Paitz, P.; Koepfli, M.; Chmiel, M.; Fichtner, A. Distributed acoustic sensing of microseismic sources and wave propagation in glaciated terrain. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 2436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Booth, A.D.; Christoffersen, P.; Schoonman, C.; Clarke, A.; Hubbard, B.; Law, R.; Doyle, S.H.; Chudley, T.R.; Chalari, A. Distributed acoustic sensing of seismic properties in a borehole drilled on a fast-flowing Greenlandic outlet glacier. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2020, 47, e2020GL088148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jousset, P.; Currenti, G.; Schwarz, B.; Chalari, A.; Tilmann, F.; Reinsch, T.; Zuccarello, L.; Privitera, E.; Krawczyk, C.M. Fibre optic distributed acoustic sensing of volcanic events. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 1753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nishimura, T.; Emoto, K.; Nakahara, H.; Miura, S.; Yamamoto, M.; Sugimura, S.; Ishikawa, A.; Kimura, T. Source location of volcanic earthquakes and subsurface characterization using fiber-optic cable and distributed acoustic sensing system. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 6319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zuo, J.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, H.; Zhu, X.; Zhao, Z.; Wei, X.; Wang, X. Pipeline leak detection technology based on distributed optical fiber acoustic sensing system. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 30789–30796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stajanca, P.; Chruscicki, S.; Homann, T.; Seifert, S.; Schmidt, D.; Habib, A. Detection of leak-induced pipeline vibrations using fiber-optic distributed acoustic sensing. Sensors 2018, 18, 2841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Milne, D.; Masoudi, A.; Ferro, E.; Watson, G.; Le Pen, L. An analysis of railway track behaviour based on distributed optical fibre acoustic sensing. Mech. Syst. Signal Proc. 2020, 142, 106769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wiesmeyr, C.; Litzenberger, M.; Waser, M.; Papp, A.; Garn, H.; Neunteufel, G.; Döller, H. Real-time train tracking from distributed acoustic sensing data. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhu, H.-H.; Shi, B.; Zhang, C.-C. FBG-based monitoring of geohazards: Current status and trends. Sensors 2017, 17, 452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Shatalin, S.; Parker, T.; Farhadiroushan, M. High definition seismic and microseismic data acquisition using distributed and engineered fiber optic acoustic sensors. In Distributed Acoustic Sensing in Geophysics: Methods and Applications; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2021; pp. 1–32. [Google Scholar]
- Shi, B.; Zhang, D.; Zhu, H.-H.; Zhang, C.; Gu, K.; Sang, H.; Han, H.; Sun, M.; Liu, J. DFOS applications to geo-engineering monitoring. Photonic Sens. 2021, 11, 158–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, H.-H.; She, J.-K.; Zhang, C.-C.; Shi, B. Experimental study on pullout performance of sensing optical fibers in compacted sand. Measurement 2015, 73, 284–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, C.-C.; Zhu, H.-H.; Liu, S.-P.; Shi, B.; Cheng, G. Quantifying progressive failure of micro-anchored fiber optic cable–sand interface via high-resolution distributed strain sensing. Can. Geotech. J. 2020, 57, 871–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, H.; Zhu, H.-H.; Zhang, C.-C.; Zhou, G.-Y.; Zhu, B.; Zhang, W.; Azarafza, M. Strain integration-based soil shear displacement measurement using high-resolution strain sensing technology. Measurement 2020, 166, 108210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Shi, B.; Wei, G.; Chen, S.E.; Zhu, H.-H.; Wang, T. Monitoring the behavior of segment joints in a shield tunnel using distributed fiber optic sensors. Struct. Control Health Monit. 2018, 25, e2056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Zhu, H.-H.; Mei, G.-X.; Xiao, T.; Liu, Z.-Y. Field monitoring of bearing capacity efficiency of permeable pipe pile in clayey soil: A comparative study. Measurement 2021, 186, 110151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, S.-H.; Li, Z.-W.; Deng, Y.-F.; Bian, X.; Zhu, H.-H.; Zhou, F.; Feng, Q. Bearing performance of steel pipe pile in multilayered marine soil using fiber optic technique: A case study. Mar. Geores. Geotechnol. 2021, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suo, W.B.; Lu, Y.; Shi, B.; Zhu, H.-H.; Wei, G.; Jiang, H. Development and application of a fixed-point fiber-optic sensing cable for ground fissure monitoring. J. Civ. Struct. Health Monit. 2016, 6, 715–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wybo, J.-L. Track circuit reliability assessment for preventing railway accidents. Saf. Sci. 2018, 110, 268–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, F.; Duan, N.; Rao, Y.-J.; Li, J. Real-time position and speed monitoring of trains using phase-sensitive OTDR. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2014, 26, 2055–2057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cedilnik, G.; Hunt, R.; Lees, G. Advances in train and rail monitoring with DAS. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Optical Fiber Sensors, Lausanne, Switzerland, 24–28 September 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Z.; Lu, B.; Zheng, H.; Ye, Q.; Pan, Z.; Cai, H.; Qu, R.; Fang, Z.; Zhao, H. Novel railway-subgrade vibration monitoring technology using phase-sensitive OTDR. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Optical Fiber Sensors, Jeju, Korea, 24–28 April 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Kowarik, S.; Hussels, M.-T.; Chruscicki, S.; Münzenberger, S.; Lämmerhirt, A.; Pohl, P.; Schubert, M. Fiber optic train monitoring with distributed acoustic sensing: Conventional and neural network data analysis. Sensors 2020, 20, 450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- He, M.; Feng, L.; Fan, J. A method for real-time monitoring of running trains using Φ-OTDR and the improved Canny. Optik 2019, 184, 356–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vidovic, I.; Marschnig, S. Optical fibres for condition monitoring of railway infrastructure—Encouraging data source or errant effort? Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 6016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Minardo, A.; Porcaro, G.; Giannetta, D.; Bernini, R.; Zeni, L. Real-time monitoring of railway traffic using slope-assisted Brillouin distributed sensors. Appl. Opt. 2013, 52, 3770–3776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, C.; Dutta, S.; Kurup, P.; Yu, T.; Wang, X. A review of railway infrastructure monitoring using fiber optic sensors. Sens. Actuator A-Phys. 2020, 303, 111728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, G.; Cui, X.; Du, B. Random-forest machine learning approach for high-speed railway track slab deformation identification using track-side vibration monitoring. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 4756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.; Liu, F.; Liu, B. Research on application of deep convolutional network in high-speed railway track inspection based on distributed fiber acoustic sensing. Opt. Commun. 2021, 492, 126981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Chen, W.; Wen, J.; Ning, J.; Li, J. The applications of synchrosqueezing time-frequency analysis in high-speed train induced seismic data processing. Chin. J. Geophys. 2019, 62, 2328–2335. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, X.; Wang, B.; Chen, W. The second-order synchrosqueezing continuous wavelet transform and its application in the high-speed-train induced seismic signal. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2020, 18, 1109–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, Y.; Bao, T.; Ning, J.; Zhang, X. Spectral characteristics of high-speed rail seismic signal under viaduct. Acta Sci. Nat. Univ. Peking 2019, 55, 829–838. [Google Scholar]
- Shao, J.; Wang, Y.; Chen, L. Near-surface characterization using high-speed train seismic data recorded by a distributed acoustic sensing array. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2022, 60, 5912911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dumont, V.; Tribaldos, V.R.; Ajo-Franklin, J.; Wu, K. Deep learning for surface wave identification in distributed acoustic sensing data. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Big Data, Atlanta, GA, USA, 15–18 December 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, X.; Zhan, Z.; Williams, E.F.; Herráez, M.G.; Martins, H.F.; Karrenbach, M. Ground vibrations recorded by fiber-optic cables reveal traffic response to COVID-19 lockdown measures in Pasadena, California. Commun. Earth Environ. 2021, 2, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H.; Ma, J.; Yan, W.; Liu, W.; Zhang, X.; Li, C. Traffic flow detection using distributed fiber optic acoustic sensing. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 68968–68980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lindsey, N.J.; Yuan, S.; Lellouch, A.; Gualtieri, L.; Lecocq, T.; Biondi, B. City-scale dark fiber DAS measurements of infrastructure use during the COVID-19 pandemic. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2020, 47, e2020GL089931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chambers, K. Using DAS to investigate traffic patterns at Brady Hot Springs, Nevada, USA. Lead. Edge 2020, 39, 819–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Williams, E.F.; Karrenbach, M.; Herráez, M.G.; Martins, H.F.; Zhan, Z. Rose Parade seismology: Signatures of floats and bands on optical fiber. Seismol. Res. Lett. 2020, 91, 2395–2398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Catalano, E.; Coscetta, A.; Cerri, E.; Cennamo, N.; Zeni, L.; Minardo, A. Automatic traffic monitoring by ϕ-OTDR data and Hough transform in a real-field environment. Appl. Opt. 2021, 60, 3579–3584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mirzaei, A.; Bahrampour, A.; Taraz, M.; Bahrampour, A.; Bahrampour, M.; Foroushani, S.A. Transient response of buried oil pipelines fiber optic leak detector based on the distributed temperature measurement. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2013, 65, 110–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Madabhushi, S.; Elshafie, M.; Haigh, S. Accuracy of distributed optical fiber temperature sensing for use in leak detection of subsea pipelines. J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 2014, 6, 04014014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lim, K.; Wong, L.; Chiu, W.K.; Kodikara, J. Distributed fiber optic sensors for monitoring pressure and stiffness changes in out-of-round pipes. Struct. Control Health Monit. 2016, 23, 303–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simpson, B.; Hoult, N.A.; Moore, I.D. Distributed sensing of circumferential strain using fiber optics during full-scale buried pipe experiments. J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 2015, 6, 04015002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.-J.; Zhu, H.-H.; Li, Y.; Zhang, C.; Shi, B. Experimental study on uplift mechanism of pipeline buried in sand using high-resolution fiber optic strain sensing nerves. J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 2022, 14, 1304–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tanimola, F.; Hill, D. Distributed fibre optic sensors for pipeline protection. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2009, 1, 134–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Jin, B.; Wang, Y.; Wang, D.; Liu, X.; Bai, Q. Real-time distributed vibration monitoring system using phi-OTDR. IEEE Sens. J. 2016, 17, 1333–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tejedor, J.; Macias-Guarasa, J.; Martins, H.F.; Martin-Lopez, S.; Gonzalez-Herraez, M. A multi-position approach in a smart fiber-optic surveillance system for pipeline integrity threat detection. Electronics 2021, 10, 712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, Y.; Xing, J.; Xie, F.; Liu, S.; Li, J. Detection and identification of external intrusion signals from 33 km optical fiber sensing system based on deep learning. Opt. Fiber Technol. 2019, 53, 102060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhan, Y.; Yu, Q.; Wang, K.; Yang, F.; Kong, Y.; Zhao, X. A high performance distributed sensor system with multi-intrusions simultaneous detection capability based on phase sensitive OTDR. Opto-Electron. Rev. 2015, 23, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, T.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, S.; Yan, Z.; Liu, D.; Sun, Q. High Accuracy Intrusion Pattern Recognition using a Dual-Stage-Recognition Network for Fiber Optic Distributed Sensing System. In Proceedings of the Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics, San Jose, CA, USA, 9–14 May 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Li, Y. Long-distance pipeline safety early warning: A distributed optical fiber sensing semi-supervised learning method. IEEE Sens. J. 2021, 21, 19453–19461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, H.; Chen, J.; Liu, X.; Xiao, Y.; Wang, M.; Zheng, Y.; Rao, Y. One-dimensional CNN-based intelligent recognition of vibrations in pipeline monitoring with DAS. J. Light. Technol. 2019, 37, 4359–4366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, S.; He, T.; Fan, C.; Li, H.; Yan, Z.; Liu, D.; Sun, Q. An intrusion recognition method based on the combination of One-dimensional CNN and DenseNet with DAS system. In Proceedings of the Asia Communications and Photonics Conference, Shanghai, China, 24–27 October 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Tejedor, J.; Martins, H.F.; Piote, D.; Macias-Guarasa, J.; Pastor-Graells, J.; Martin-Lopez, S.; Guillén, P.C.; De Smet, F.; Postvoll, W.; González-Herráez, M. Toward prevention of pipeline integrity threats using a smart fiber-optic surveillance system. J. Light. Technol. 2016, 34, 4445–4453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tejedor, J.; Macias-Guarasa, J.; Martins, H.F.; Martin-Lopez, S.; Gonzalez-Herraez, M. A contextual GMM-HMM smart fiber optic surveillance system for pipeline integrity threat detection. J. Light. Technol. 2019, 37, 4514–4522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tejedor, J.; Macias-Guarasa, J.; Martins, H.F.; Piote, D.; Pastor-Graells, J.; Martin-Lopez, S.; Corredera, P.; Gonzalez-Herraez, M. A novel fiber optic based surveillance system for prevention of pipeline integrity threats. Sensors 2017, 17, 355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tejedor, J.; Macias-Guarasa, J.; Martins, H.F.; Pastor-Graells, J.; Corredera, P.; Martin-Lopez, S. Machine learning methods for pipeline surveillance systems based on distributed acoustic sensing: A review. Appl. Sci. 2017, 7, 841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wang, F.; Liu, Z.; Zhou, X.; Li, S.; Yuan, X.; Zhang, Y.; Shao, L.; Zhang, X. Oil and gas pipeline leakage recognition based on distributed vibration and temperature information fusion. Results Opt. 2021, 5, 100131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muggleton, J.; Hunt, R.; Rustighi, E.; Lees, G.; Pearce, A. Gas pipeline leak noise measurements using optical fibre distributed acoustic sensing. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2020, 78, 103293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, Y.; Meng, Z.; Ai, X.; Li, H.; Hu, Y.; Zhao, H. Hybrid Feature extraction of pipeline microstates based on Φ-OTDR sensing system. J. Control Sci. Eng. 2019, 2019, 6087582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Q.; Li, Q.; Chen, L.; Quan, J.; Li, L. Pattern recognition based on pulse scanning imaging and convolutional neural network for vibrational events in Φ-OTDR. Optik 2020, 219, 165205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, H.; Sun, Z.; Qian, Y.; Zhang, T.; Rao, Y. A hydrostatic leak test for water pipeline by using distributed optical fiber vibration sensing system. In Proceedings of the Fifth Asia-Pacific Optical Sensors Conference, Jeju, Korea, 20–25 May 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, L.; Hao, H.; Li, X.; Li, J. Source identification of microseismic events in underground mines with interferometric imaging and cross wavelet transform. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2018, 71, 318–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Y.; Li, H.; Fan, C.; Yan, B.; Chen, J.; Yan, Z.; Sun, Q. Review of a specialty fiber for distributed acoustic sensing technology. Photonics 2022, 9, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, D.; Tian, B.; Li, H.; Fan, C.; Liu, T.; He, T.; Liu, Y.; Yan, Z.; Sun, Q. Intelligent structure monitoring for tunnel steel loop based on distributed acoustic sensing. In Proceedings of the Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics 2021, San Jose, CA, USA, 9–14 May 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, T.-Y.; Shi, B.; Zhang, C.-C.; Xie, T.; Yin, J.; Li, J.-P. Tunnel disturbance events monitoring and recognition with distributed acoustic sensing (DAS). Earth Environ. 2021, 861, 042034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duckworth, G.; Owen, A.; Worsley, J.; Stephenson, H. Optasense® distributed acoustic and seismic sensing performance for multi-threat, multi-environment border monitoring. In Proceedings of the 2013 European Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference, Uppsala, Sweden, 13–14 August 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Aslangul, S.A. Detecting tunnels for border decurity based on fiber optical distributed acoustic sensor data using DBSCAN. Sensornets 2020, 1, 78–84. [Google Scholar]
- Cai, Y.; Ma, J.; Yan, W.; Zhang, W.; An, Y. Aircraft detection using phase-sensitive optical-fiber OTDR. Sensors 2021, 21, 5094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hubbard, P.G.; Xu, J.; Zhang, S.; Dejong, M.; Luo, L.; Soga, K.; Papa, C.; Zulberti, C.; Malara, D.; Fugazzotto, F. Dynamic structural health monitoring of a model wind turbine tower using distributed acoustic sensing (DAS). J. Civ. Struct. Health Monit. 2021, 11, 833–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferdinand, P. The evolution of optical fiber sensors technologies during the 35 last years and their applications in structure health monitoring. In Proceedings of the 7th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Nantes, France, 8–11 July 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Jasenek, J. Capabilities and limitations of coherent optical frequency-domain reflectometry. J. Electr. Eng. Technol. 2001, 52, 187–192. [Google Scholar]
- Yuksel, K.; Wuilpart, M.; Moeyaert, V.; Mégret, P. Optical frequency domain reflectometry: A review. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks, Miguel, Portugal, 28 June–2 July 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Dean, T.; Cuny, T.; Hartog, A.H. The effect of gauge length on axially incident P-waves measured using fibre optic distributed vibration sensing. Geophys. Prospect. 2017, 65, 184–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lindsey, N.J.; Rademacher, H.; Ajo-Franklin, J.B. On the broadband instrument response of fiber-optic DAS arrays. J. Geophys. Res.-Solid Earth 2020, 125, e2019JB018145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajo-Franklin, J.B.; Dou, S.; Lindsey, N.J.; Monga, I.; Tracy, C.; Robertson, M.; Rodriguez Tribaldos, V.; Ulrich, C.; Freifeld, B.; Daley, T. Distributed acoustic sensing using dark fiber for near-surface characterization and broadband seismic event detection. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Xie, T.; Zhang, C.-C.; Shi, B.; Li, J.-P.; Zhang, T.-Y. Could fiber strains affect DAS amplitude response? Measurement 2022, 189, 110428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muir, J.B.; Zhan, Z. Wavefield-based evaluation of DAS instrument response and array design. Geophys. J. Int. 2022, 229, 21–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, B.; Pan, Z.; Wang, Z.; Zheng, H.; Ye, Q.; Qu, R.; Cai, H. High spatial resolution phase-sensitive optical time domain reflectometer with a frequency-swept pulse. Opt. Lett. 2017, 42, 391–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yu, C.; Zhan, Z.; Lindsey, N.J.; Ajo-Franklin, J.B.; Robertson, M. The potential of DAS in teleseismic studies: Insights from the Goldstone experiment. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2019, 46, 1320–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, S.; Lellouch, A.; Clapp, R.G.; Biondi, B. Near-surface characterization using a roadside distributed acoustic sensing array. Lead. Edge 2020, 39, 646–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, X.; Shi, B.; Zhang, C.-C.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, L.; Han, H. Strain transfer mechanism in surface-bonded distributed fiber-optic sensors subjected to linear strain gradients: Theoretical modeling and experimental validation. Measurement 2021, 179, 109510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, Z.; Liu, Q. Optical fiber distributed acoustic sensors: A review. J. Light. Technol. 2021, 39, 3671–3686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rao, Y.; Wang, Z.; Wu, H.; Ran, Z.; Han, B. Recent advances in phase-sensitive optical time domain reflectometry (Φ-OTDR). Photonic Sens. 2021, 11, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gabai, H.; Eyal, A. On the sensitivity of distributed acoustic sensing. Opt. Lett. 2016, 41, 5648–5651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Costa, L.; Martins, H.F.; Martin-Lopez, S.; Fernández-Ruiz, M.R.; Gonzalez-Herraez, M. Reaching pε/√ Hz sensitivity in a distributed optical fiber strain sensor. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Optical Fiber Sensors, Lausanne, Switzerland, 24–28 September 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, M.; Fan, X.; Liu, Q.; He, Z. Quasi-distributed fiber-optic acoustic sensing system based on pulse compression technique and phase-noise compensation. Opt. Lett. 2019, 44, 5969–5972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stepanov, K.V.; Zhirnov, A.A.; Koshelev, K.I.; Chernutsky, A.O.; Khan, R.I.; Pnev, A.B. Sensitivity improvement of phi-OTDR by fiber cable coils. Sensors 2021, 21, 7077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Lu, B.; Ye, Q.; Cai, H. Recent progress in distributed fiber acoustic sensing with Φ-OTDR. Sensors 2020, 20, 6594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hornman, J. Field trial of seismic recording using distributed acoustic sensing with broadside sensitive fibre-optic cables. Geophys. Prospect. 2017, 65, 35–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuvshinov, B. Interaction of helically wound fibre-optic cables with plane seismic waves. Geophys. Prospect. 2016, 64, 671–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hornman, K.; Kuvshinov, B.; Zwartjes, P.; Franzen, A. Field trial of a broadside-sensitive distributed acoustic sensing cable for surface seismic. In Proceedings of the 75th European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers Conference, London, UK, 10–13 January 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Ning, I.L.C.; Sava, P. High-resolution multi-component distributed acoustic sensing. Geophys. Prospect. 2018, 66, 1111–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Van den Ende, M.; Ampuero, J.-P. Evaluating seismic beamforming capabilities of distributed acoustic sensing arrays. Solid Earth 2021, 12, 915–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Parameter | HDAS (Aragon Photonics) | Helios DAS (Fotech) | MS-DAS2000 (Ovlink) | IDAS3 (Silixa) | CRI-4400 (Halliburton) | QuantX (OptaSense) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Strain sensitivity (ε) | 10−9 | 10−9 | 10−9 | 10−9 | 10−9 | 10−9 |
Spatial resolution (m) | 10 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Sensing range without repeaters (km) | 70 | 50 | 20 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
Method | Measurement Objects | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|---|
Fixture-fixed installation [43] | Tunnels, pipelines, etc. | Easy installation and low cost | Poor coupling at some positions |
Slotted and glued installation [44] | Formed reinforced concrete structures | Good overall coupling effect | Time-consuming |
Spot welding installation [45] | Steel beams, rails, and other metal structures | Easy installation and low cost | Poor coupling at some positions |
Groove installation [46] | Geotechnical structures | Strong concealment and good overall coupling effect | Time-consuming |
Technique | Specifications | Measurement Parameters | Characteristics | Limitations |
---|---|---|---|---|
FBG | Type: quasi-distributed Range: ≈100 channels [100] Spatial resolution: 2 mm | Temperature, strain, pressure, and displacement | Simple structure, small size, lightweight, good compatibility, low optical loss, and high sensitivity | The grating subsides under high temperatures and chirps easily under sticking and compression; it is easily damaged when processed and some information is blocked because of the quasi-distribution |
DAS | Type: distributed Typical sensing range: 1–50 km Typical spatial resolution: 5–10 m | Strain, Temperature, vibrations, sound waves, and seismic waves | Single-end measurement, wide response bandwidth, large measuring range, and dynamic monitoring | Huge amounts of monitoring data; directional sensitivity |
OFDR | Type: distributed Typical Sensing Range: 1–50 m Typical Spatial Resolutions: 1–2 cm | Strain and temperature | High sensitivity, High S/N ratio, and suitable for static measurements | Not suitable for long-distance monitoring; nonlinearity effects [101]; laser intensity noise [102] |
BOTDA | Type: distributed Typical sensing range: 1–50 km Typical spatial resolution: 1–10 m | Temperature, displacement, deformations, And deflections | Double-end measurement, large measuring range, and high accuracy for the measurement of absolute temperature and strain values | Unable to detect breakpoints; high monitoring risks brought by double-end measurement |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Zhu, H.-H.; Liu, W.; Wang, T.; Su, J.-W.; Shi, B. Distributed Acoustic Sensing for Monitoring Linear Infrastructures: Current Status and Trends. Sensors 2022, 22, 7550. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22197550
Zhu H-H, Liu W, Wang T, Su J-W, Shi B. Distributed Acoustic Sensing for Monitoring Linear Infrastructures: Current Status and Trends. Sensors. 2022; 22(19):7550. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22197550
Chicago/Turabian StyleZhu, Hong-Hu, Wei Liu, Tao Wang, Jing-Wen Su, and Bin Shi. 2022. "Distributed Acoustic Sensing for Monitoring Linear Infrastructures: Current Status and Trends" Sensors 22, no. 19: 7550. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22197550