Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Next Article in Journal
Oxygen Vacancy Dynamics in Highly Crystalline Zinc Oxide Film Investigated by PIERS Effect
Next Article in Special Issue
Structure and Properties of Ti/Ti64 Graded Material Manufactured by Laser Powder Bed Fusion
Previous Article in Journal
Recent Progress in the Development of Advanced Functionalized Electrodes for Oxygen Evolution Reaction: An Overview
Previous Article in Special Issue
Preparation of W-C-Co Composite Micropowder with Spherical Shaped Particles Using Plasma Technologies
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Structure and Properties of Barium Titanate Lead-Free Piezoceramic Manufactured by Binder Jetting Process

Institute of Mechanical Engineering, Materials, and Transport, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 195251 Saint Petersburg, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2021, 14(16), 4419; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14164419
Submission received: 18 June 2021 / Revised: 3 August 2021 / Accepted: 4 August 2021 / Published: 6 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Materials, Design and Process Development for Additive Manufacturing)

Abstract

:
This article presents the results of manufacturing samples from barium titanate (BaTiO3) lead-free piezoceramics by using the binder jetting additive manufacturing process. An investigation of the manufacturing process steps for two initial powders with different particle size distributions was carried. The influence of the sintering and the particle size distribution of the starting materials on grain size and functional properties was evaluated. Samples from fine unimodal powder compared to coarse multimodal one have 3–4% higher relative density values, as well as a piezoelectric coefficient of 1.55 times higher values (d33 = 183 pC/N and 118 pC/N correspondingly). The influence of binder saturation on sintering modes was demonstrated. Binder jetting with 100% saturation for both powders enables printing samples without delamination and cracking. Sintering at 1400 °C with a dwell time of 6 h forms the highest density samples. The microstructure of sintered samples was characterized with scanning electron microscopy. The possibility of manufacturing parts from functional ceramics using additive manufacturing was demonstrated.

1. Introduction

Functional ceramics are a class of materials that exhibit special properties in addition to those already inherent in ceramics, such as chemical and thermal stability. Functional ceramics typically exhibit one or more unique properties: biological, electrical, magnetic, or chemical. [1]. Due to this, they are used in engine production, aviation, and space industries [2]. The most promising types of functional ceramics include piezoceramics [3]. Piezoelectric ceramics are used to make sensor devices, energy harvesters, and actuators [4,5,6]. Piezoelectric materials are of particular interest as pressure and temperature sensors in high-frequency environments [7,8]. Piezoelectric ceramics have generated particular interest in the power industry because they can withstand the harsh environmental conditions present in energy conversion systems [9]. However, despite their advantages as sensitive devices, piezoceramics also have the same internal disadvantages that are observed in most ceramic materials: they are difficult to process [10], and their fragility causes low fracture resistance [11]. Therefore, the manufacture of non-standard complex geometries from ceramic materials can be practically impossible using conventional manufacturing methods. The proposed method for circumventing this problem is the manufacture of complex ceramic parts using additive manufacturing (AM) [12]. AM has such advantages as the absence of expensive tools, easy scalability of the process, the ability to implement parts of complex shapes, a high degree of material utilization and minimum production time [13]. One of the most relevant materials for ceramic additive manufacturing is a piezoelectric material since it generates an electric charge when deformed or, conversely, deforms when an electric potential is applied. The use of AM for the manufacture of piezoelectric materials will expand the scope of their application, expanding the possibilities of forming multilayer, as well as complex geometries of structures. Therefore, the possibility of integrating piezoelectric materials during the manufacturing process itself would lead to the creation of multifunctional structures within a single processing process. With great freedom in the achievable geometries of piezoelectric elements, the prospect opens for a significant improvement in the performance of many devices based on piezoelectric and ferroelectric properties [14,15].
Some previous investigations of additive manufacturing lead-based piezoceramics have been made using direct writing/FDM [16,17], stereolithography-based processes [18,19], and ink-jetting [20]. Due to the toxicity of lead compounds, the development of new piezomaterials and technologies is moving towards lead-free piezomaterials. Barium titanate (BaTiO3) is one of the most widely used lead-free piezoceramic materials, which became widespread due to its high dielectric and piezoelectric properties [21]. The most promising methods of 3D printing BaTiO3 are direct writing (DW) [22,23,24,25], vat photopolymerization (VP) [26,27,28,29,30], and binder jetting (BJ) [31,32,33,34]. Samples printed using DW have the best piezoelectric coefficient values (d33 = 200 pC/N [22]) and a density (6.01 g/cm3 [23]) close to the theoretical density limit of BaTiO3 (6.02 g/cm3). However, the quality of the surface printed layer is rather rough, which may be a limitation for using this technology. It is also worth noting that difficulties arise when using printing nozzles with a diameter less than 500 microns—the nozzle can clog with ceramic powder particles, and this reduces the accuracy of printing parts [23]. Samples printed using VP also have high piezoelectric coefficient values (d33 = 165 pC/N [27] and high material density (5.64 g/cm3 [26]). However, there are next limitations when using this 3D printing technology [29]: (i) using 3D printer with a layer spreading system for viscous slurry with a high solid loading of ceramics in the photopolymer resin; (ii) the high refractive index of UV light for BaTiO3 that limits the curing depth; (iii) a long time of debinding process that directly affects the final result of the subsequent sintering. Samples printed using BJ have low piezoelectric coefficient values (d33 = 74.1 pC/N [31], d33 = 112 pC/N [32] and have a low density (3.93 g/cm3 [31], 2.21 g/cm3 [32]). However, this technology ensures the high quality of printed parts and excludes difficulties of the debinding process.
The BJ additive process is a method where a nozzle print-head jets a liquid binder on a powder layer in places that correspond to the cross-section of the computer model of a part. The result of BJ printing is a green model with low mechanical properties and high porosity. The green model needs further curing, debinding, and sintering. As a result, the characteristics of parts made of the polymer [35], metal [36,37,38] and ceramics [39] printed on a 3D printer largely depend on manufacturing and postprocessing parameters. Consequently, the behavior of functional ceramics made with additive technologies must be further studied to expand the capabilities of this new technique.
In this paper, BaTiO3 lead-free piezoceramic was used to study the additive manufacturing of piezoelements by using the BJ process. The influence of the manufacturing process on the properties of the material was characterized and discussed, and the dielectric and piezoelectric properties of the manufactured samples were measured.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Two types of BaTiO3 powder were used for printing by BJ: (i) micron powder with multimodal particle size distribution (PSD) (C-BaTiO3, ZAO NPF Luminofor, Stavropol, Russia) D10—0.1 µm, D50—3.4 µm, D90—25.4 µm, and (ii) submicron powder with unimodal PSD (F-BaTiO3, Acros Organics, Geel, Belgium) D10—0.6 µm, D50—1.1 µm, D90—2.1 µm. Figure 1 and Figure 2 shows images of as-received powders. The C-BaTiO3 powder has particle sizes of about 1 μm, forms agglomerates up to 25 μm (Figure 1). The F-BaTiO3, powder has particle sizes about 1 μm (Figure 2). Figure 3 shows the particle size distributions which demonstrates that the C-BaTiO3 powder consists of agglomerates and reveals three peaks and contains small particles. The unimodal powder is much more homogeneous, while in the case of the multimodal powder one can observe the agglomeration of small particles into larger clusters, which correspond to the third peak in the PSD with a medium size at about 20 microns.

2.2. Fabrication

For the experiment green models of cubic shape with dimensions of 10 × 10 × 10 mm3 were printed to study subsequent debinding and sintering processes. Also, the two types of cylindrical green models (diameter 15 mm and 10 mm, height 10 mm and 1 mm respectively) were printed to investigate the electromechanical properties.
The piezoceramic samples were manufactured on the ExOne Innovent system (The ExOne Company, North Huntingdon, PA, USA). This system relates to the BJ additive manufacturing process. The original ExOne BS004 solvent binder and CL001 cleaner were used for the printing of the functional ceramic components.
The BJ process can be divided into several stages, a schematic image of which is shown in Figure 4:
  • A thin layer of powder material is formed on the platform using a roller;
  • A liquid binder is selectively sprayed to the powder layer using a print head, in accordance with the cross-section of the computer model;
  • Then the platform is lowered to a given thickness of one layer;
  • The powder layer is dried and heated using an infrared heater;
  • From the hopper, using an oscillator, the powder is fed to the surface of the platform and a new layer of powder is applied;
  • Then the layer is leveled using a rotating roller;
  • Processes 1–6 are repeated until a full-size green model is made.
Printed parts are considered “green” and are not suitable for end-use. Thus, these green models require further post-processing, such as sintering or infiltration, to achieve the desired mechanical and functional properties.
After the 3D printing, the platform (together with the green models in the powder surround) is placed in the thermal furnace (Yamato DX412C, Yamato Scientific, Santa Clara, CA, USA) at 180 °C for 3 h for curing.
After curing, the green models have sufficient strength to remove excess and loose powder. For green models of a simple shape, removal was done with a brush; for complex shapes removal was done using compressed air.

2.3. Thermal Post-Treatment

Before thermal post-treatment, the green models were placed in alumina crucibles with lids. The debinding process was performed in a muffle furnace (KJ-1700X, Zhengzhou Kejia Furnace Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou, China) at a temperature of 650 °C with a dwell time of 60 min. After debinding, the samples were sintered in a muffle furnace at 1300, 1350, and 1400 °C with a dwell times of 2, 4, and 6 h under an air atmosphere. The thermal post-treatment profiles are illustrated in Figure 5.

2.4. Characterization

The particle size distribution of the powders was determined by laser diffraction Analysette 22 NanoTec plus (Fritsch, Idar-Oberstein, Germany) with a total measurement range of 0.01–2000 μm.
TGA analysis of BS004 solvent binder was performed using a thermogravimetric analyzer (Q5000, TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA). The heating was carried out in an airflow of 30 mL/min in the temperature range 30–700 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min. The binder was placed in a platinum crucible, after which it was heated from room temperature up to 700 °C in air.
The structure of the samples after sintering was studied using a Leica DMI5000 optical microscope (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) and a Tescan Mira3 LMU scanning electron microscope (SEM) operating at magnifications from 4× to 106× with an accelerating voltage from 200 V to 30 kV. The chemical composition was measured using an energy-dispersion accessory into the SEM.
Optical and SEM-images of sintered samples from C-BaTiO3 and F-BaTiO3 were examined using the ImageJ Software. v.1.52a (Bethesda, MD, USA) The grain sizes were analyzed for various temperature and time sintering conditions.
The density of the sintered samples was measured by the Archimedes method; the calculation of relative density was made in accordance with the theoretical density of BaTiO3 (6.02 g/cm3).
The phase composition was analyzed using a Bruker D8 Advance X-ray (Bruker corp., Billerica, MA, USA) diffractometer (XRD) using CuKa radiation (l = 1.5418 Å) without monochromator.
All samples for the electrical performance test were coated with silver electrodes (paste PP-17, Delta, Zelenograd, Russia) at 700 °C for 30 min. The samples were poled in air, at Tc + 20 °C (Tc-Curie temperature 120–130 °C for BaTiO3). Then, an electric field of 0.6 kV/mm for 30 min was applied to samples, followed by cooling to room temperature. Dielectric constant έ, the loss tangent tgδ, electromechanical coupling coefficient kp, and piezoelectric coefficient d33 were measured and calculated. Dielectric properties were measured on cylindrical samples with a diameter of 10 mm and a height of 1 mm. The capacity of the sample and the loss tangent were measured with an E7-28 immittance analyzer at 1 kHz frequency at 0.5 V effective voltage. The piezoelectric coefficient d33 was determined on polarized cylindrical samples using the APC YE2730A setup by a quasi-static method. The values of the electromechanical coupling coefficient were calculated by the following equation:
k p = δ p a p + b p · δ p ,
where, ap, bp are the coefficients determined of Planar Poisson’s Ratio, δp is the relative resonance gap. The Planar Poisson’s ratio value was determined by the frequencies ratio of the third and first (main) overtones of the planar vibration mode on piezoelectric elements in the form of a disk.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Investigation of Debinding Process

The TGA curve showed that when heated to 180.5 °C a sharp mass decrease by 86.82% was observed (Figure 6). This is due to the evaporation of two components: ethylene glycol monobutyl ether (EGBE), isopropanol (IPA), and the polymerization of ethylene glycol to polyethylene glycol. The boiling temperatures of evaporating components are much lower at 171 °C and 80.4 °C, respectively.
A further mass decrease occurred at a temperature range of 380–450 °C. As a result, the remaining mass of the binder was 0.82% of the initial one. Increasing the temperature leads to a linear decreasing of mass; the binder was almost completely thermally decomposed at 664 °C and the residue was 0.21% of the initial mass. Thus, mass loss of the binder is observed in two stages: the first stage—mass decreases on 86.85%, this stage ends at a temperature of 180.5 °C. The second stage is the temperature range from 180 to 664 °C. Here, from 180 to 447 °C, no significant mass loss occurs. From 447 to 664 °C, the mass loss is up to 0.21% of the original mass.
The first stage is associated with the transition of ethylene glycol to polyethylene glycol during curing, the second stage is debinding by the burn out of the residue components of the binder [40].

3.2. Binder Jetting Process

For the BJ process, the recoating speed (28 mm/s and 65 mm/s for C-BaTiO3 and F-BaTiO3 respectively) and the frequency of the oscillator (5000 rpm and 4400 rpm for C-BaTiO3 and F-BaTiO3 respectively) were previously optimized to apply a sufficient amount of material to form a smooth thin powder layer. Considering this, the layer thickness for C-BaTiO3 and F-BaTiO3 powder was 100 µm and 35 µm, respectively. The drying time and temperature were also optimized to achieve a uniform layer without cracking and without smearing. The main BJ parameters are shown in Table 1.
Further, the saturation parameter was investigated. Binder saturation is a computed value used to quantify how much binder is dispensed into each unit volume of powder material. Improper saturation of the binder can cause an inhomogeneous layer of powder as well as inaccurate dimensions of printed parts. The theoretical binder saturation (%) was estimated using the following equation:
S = 1000 × V ( 1 ( PR 100 ) ) × X × Y × Z ,
where V is the volume of binder per drop (pL), PR is the packing rate (%), X and Y are the spacing between binder droplets (μm), and Z is the layer thickness (μm). To obtain the green part with sufficient mechanical strength and surface quality, optimizing the saturation level is critical.
The saturation for C-BaTiO3 powder varied from 40 to 140% with a step of 20%. For F-BaTiO3 powder, the saturation varied from 50 to 200% with a step of 50%. When printing the C-BaTiO3 and F-BaTiO3 samples, no defects were observed on the surface of the powder layer. The powder layer was applied uniformly, the particles did not stick to the roller. After curing of C-BaTiO3 samples printed at 40% saturation, the green model delaminated. At 60% and 80% saturation, the deviation from the computer model size amounted to 0.37 mm along the X and Y-axes and more than 0.1 mm along the Z-axis. For 100% saturation, the C-BaTiO3 samples had clear boundaries and the deviation from the computer model size was about 0.2 mm along the X and Y-axes, and less than 0.05 mm along the Z-axis. At 120% and 140% saturation, the geometry of the green models changed significantly and appeared to be barrel-shaped.
After curing of F-BaTiO3 samples printed at 50% saturation, the green model delaminated since there was not enough binder to bond the layers together. For 100% saturation, the F-BaTiO3 samples had clear boundaries and the deviation from the computer model size was about 0.2 mm along the X and Y-axes, and less than 0.02 mm along the Z-axis. At 150% and 200% saturation, the deviation from the computer model size amounted to 0.36 mm and 0.38 mm along the X and Y-axes and more than 0.21 mm and 0.25 along the Z-axis, respectively.

3.3. Investigation of Sintering Process, Shrinkage, Microstructure, Porosity

For investigation of sintering process BaTiO3 samples, the following samples were selected: C-BaTiO3 samples printed at 60, 80, and 100% saturation; F-BaTiO3 samples printed at 100, 150, and 200% saturation.
To understand the influence of saturation level test-sintering was carried out at 1400 °C with a dwell time of 4 h. Samples of C-BaTiO3 printed with 60 and 80% saturation after test-sintering delaminated due to the weak contact between the layers. Also, F-BaTiO3 samples cracked at 150 and 200% saturation, which is due to the high content of the binder. Seemingly, due to the high content of the binder in samples, during debinding and subsequent sintering, the formation of a large amount of gas occurred, leading to the appearance of cracks. However, the C-BaTiO3 and F-BaTiO3 samples printed at 100% saturation after test-sintering were free from defects. Figure 7 shows an image of F-BaTiO3 samples obtained at different saturations after test-sintering. As a result, samples with 100% saturation for both types of powder were selected for further investigation of the sintering process.
Subsequently, these samples were subjected to sintering in the temperature range of 1300–1400 °C for 2–6 h. Sintering experiments at temperature 1500 °C led to the melting of BaTiO3 and the destruction of the samples. Initially, the study of the sintering process was carried out for C-BaTiO3 samples at various temperatures of 1300, 1350, and 1400 °C. The best value for the density of the material was achieved at 1400 °C. Considering that the particle size of the C-BaTiO3 powder is close to the particle size of the F-BaTiO3 powder (but different agglomerates sizes), a further investigation of sintering for the F-BaTiO3 samples was carried out at a temperature of 1400 °C with dwell times of 2, 4, and 6 h.
Figure 8 shows graphs of the dependence of sintered samples density on dwell time. The density of the samples increases with an increasing dwell time. The density of F-BaTiO3 samples is higher compared to C-BaTiO3 samples. The density of C-BaTiO3 samples is lower, but the printing speed is higher due to layer thickness difference. During the printing of cylindrical samples from F-BaTiO3 with 15 mm diameter and 10 mm height, the printing time was 7 h, which is 4 h longer than the printing time for similar size samples from C-BaTiO3 powder.
Increasing the temperature and dwell time of sintering leads to grain enlargement. The graphs in Figure 9 show that the grain size of samples from the unimodal powder is more sensitive to changes in temperature and dwell time compared to samples made from multimodal powder. This feature allows adjusting the functional properties of the material in a wider range.
As a result of the sintering of samples from C-BaTiO3, the shrinkage along the XY direction was 20–25%. The Z-axis shrinkage varied from 24.1% to 24.4%. The measured linear shrinkage of samples from F-BaTiO3 along the XY direction was 24–27%. The Z-axis shrinkage was 25–26%.
The microstructure of the sintered BaTiO3 samples is shown in Figure 10. The structure is a rounded grain formed as a result of sintering the powder material. Some sintered samples have round-shaped pores, these defects may be associated with binder removal since at this stage there is active gas formation, and perhaps a consequence of the non-optimal sintering mode as well.
According to EDS measurements, the chemical composition of samples was 59.2% of Ba, 18.8% of Ti, and 22% of O (weight %) which corresponds with BaTiO3 formulation. Figure 11 shows the diffraction patterns of the C-BaTiO3 samples. X-ray diffraction analysis showed that all samples are composed of the tetragonal crystal lattice P4mm of BaTiO3, as evidenced by bifurcated peaks (compare to cubic lattice Pm-3m).
To demonstrate the applicability of the developed modes of the BJ process and thermal post-treatment for manufacturing parts with complex geometries, test samples with lattice structures were made from F-BaTiO3 powder (Figure 12).

3.4. Investigation of Functional Properties

The investigation of the functional piezoelectric properties was carried out for C-BaTiO3 samples (a temperature of 1400 °C and a dwell time of 6 h) and F-BaTiO3 (a temperature of 1400 °C and a dwell time of 4 h). These samples were selected considering the highest density and grain size up to 50 microns. This grain size is due to the fact that, for BaTiO3-based piezoceramic, the high functional properties arise with a grain size of 10 to 50 μm [41]. Table 2 shows the test results of the functional properties of sintered samples manufactured from multimodal and unimodal BaTiO3 powders. Samples printed from C-BaTiO3 powder are inferior in dielectric constant, electromechanical coupling coefficient, and piezoelectric coefficient to samples printed from F-BaTiO3. This can be explained by the non-optimal mode of debinding and sintering, the presence of large pores, and as a result, a decrease of the active phase volume of the sample.
Appreciating the main parameter piezoelectric coefficient d33, it can be noted that using the BJ process allows achieving 72.4% of the piezoelectric coefficient compared to the value obtained by traditional manufacturing technology with multimodal PSD powder and 79.6% of the d33 values obtained with unimodal PSD powder. Pressing and sintering were used as the traditional technology, and a solution of polyvinyl alcohol was used as a binder. Sintering was carried out at a temperature of 1350 °C, heating rate 100 °C/h, a dwell time of 3 h.
According to the results of studies published in [32], the functional characteristics of AM piezoceramics depend on the direction of measurement. The functional properties along the Z-axis are about 20% smaller in comparison with the XY direction. In the current study, the properties were measured only along the Z-axis, but the achieved values of piezoelectric coefficient d33 = 183 pC/N and dielectric constant έ = 811 exceed the values obtained by the authors [32] parallel (d33 = 113 pC/N, έ = 581.6) and perpendicular to the printing orientation (d33 = 152.7 pC/N, έ = 698). These differences seem to be related to the raw material and the corresponding difference in technological parameters of BJ and subsequent thermal post-treatment.
The presented results demonstrate that the use of a unimodal PSD powder of lead-free piezoceramics barium titanate allows achieving higher piezoelectric properties, and the use of binder jetting technology allows the creation of objects with complex geometry, which has potential in the manufacture of ultrasonic products used in medicine, aviation, marine industry, sensors for monitoring welded joints, pressure sensors in pipelines, etc.
Future research areas that allow for improving piezoelectric properties include the use of new lead-free piezoelectric materials with increased characteristics (such as KNN, BZT-BCT, etc.), as well as the creation of functional gradient systems and the use of multimaterial 3D printing.

4. Conclusions

The paper presents the results of the additive manufacturing of piezoelectric elements using the binder jetting process. Two powders with different particle size distributions were used as raw materials. Binder jetting with 100% saturation for C-BaTiO3 and for F-BaTiO3 allows printing samples without delamination and cracking. Sintering at 1400 °C with a dwell time of 6 h forms the highest density samples. It was determined that samples from the unimodal powder are more sensitive to increasing grain size during sintering. The measured dielectric and piezoelectric properties of the samples also demonstrated that samples from unimodal powder F-BaTiO3 have higher values. The results of the functional piezoelectric properties obtained by binder jetting with C-BaTiO3 are d33 = 118 pC/N, έ = 750, and with F-BaTiO3: d33 = 183 pC/N, έ = 811.
The future possibilities of improving functional characteristics of samples manufactured with BJ are increasing speed, optimizing sintering modes, and using new lead-free piezoelectric materials with improved functional characteristics.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.S.; investigation, A.K. and V.S.; methodology, A.S.; project administration, V.S. and A.P.; funding acquisition, A.P.; writing—original draft, A.K. and A.S.; writing—review & editing, A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was carried out as part of the work under the State Contract No. H.4щ.241.09.20.1081 dated 04.06.2020 (ISC 17706413348200001110).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yin, Q.; Zhu, B.; Zeng, H. Microstructure, Property and Processing of Functional Ceramics; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; ISBN 3642016944. [Google Scholar]
  2. Mostafaei, A.; Elliott, A.M.; Barnes, J.E.; Cramer, C.L.; Nandwana, P.; Chmielus, M. Binder jet 3D printing—Process parameters, materials, properties, and challenges. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2020, 100684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Eichel, R.-A.; Erünal, E.; Drahus, M.D.; Smyth, D.M.; van Tol, J.; Acker, J.; Kungl, H.; Hoffmann, M.J. Local variations in defect polarization and covalent bonding in ferroelectric Cu2+-doped PZT and KNN functional ceramics at the morphotropic phase boundary. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2009, 11, 8698–8705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lin, X.; Yuan, F.G. Diagnostic Lamb waves in an integrated piezoelectric sensor/actuator plate: Analytical and experimental studies. Smart Mater. Struct. 2001, 10, 907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chavez, L.A.; Jimenez, F.O.Z.; Wilburn, B.R.; Delfin, L.C.; Kim, H.; Love, N.; Lin, Y. Characterization of thermal energy harvesting using pyroelectric ceramics at elevated temperatures. Energy Harvest. Syst. 2018, 5, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhao, X.; Gao, H.; Zhang, G.; Ayhan, B.; Yan, F.; Kwan, C.; Rose, J.L. Active health monitoring of an aircraft wing with embedded piezoelectric sensor/actuator network: I. Defect detection, localization and growth monitoring. Smart Mater. Struct. 2007, 16, 1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kim, H.; Torres, F.; Villagran, D.; Stewart, C.; Lin, Y.; Tseng, T.B. 3D printing of BaTiO3/PVDF composites with electric in situ poling for pressure sensor applications. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2017, 302, 1700229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, S.; Yu, F. Piezoelectric materials for high temperature sensors. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2011, 94, 3153–3170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chavez, L.A.; Elicerio, V.F.; Regis, J.E.; Kim, H.; Rosales, C.A.G.; Love, N.D.; Lin, Y. Thermal and mechanical energy har-vesting using piezoelectric ceramics. Mater. Res. Express 2018, 6, 25701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yonghong, L.; Zhixin, J.; Jinchun, L. Study on hole machining of non-conducting ceramics by gas-filled electrodischarge and electrochemical compound machining. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 1997, 69, 198–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cook, R.F.; Freiman, S.W.; Lawn, B.R.; Pohanka, R.C. Fracture of ferroelectric ceramics. Ferroelectrics 1983, 50, 267–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gao, W.; Zhang, Y.; Ramanujan, D.; Ramani, K.; Chen, Y.; Williams, C.B.; Wang, C.C.L.; Shin, Y.C.; Zhang, S.; Zavattieri, P.D. The status, challenges, and future of additive manufacturing in engineering. Comput. Des. 2015, 69, 65–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Salehi, M.; Gupta, M.; Maleksaeedi, S.; Sharon, N.M.L. Inkjet Based 3D Additive Manufacturing of Metals; Materials Research Forum LLC: Millersville, PA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  14. Xu, Y.; Wu, X.; Guo, X.; Kong, B.; Zhang, M.; Qian, X.; Mi, S.; Sun, W. The boom in 3D-printed sensor technology. Sensors 2017, 17, 1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhang, X.; Song, S.; Yao, M.J. Fabrication of embedded piezoelectric sensors and its application in traffic engineering. In Proceedings of the 2017 2nd IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Engineering (ICITE), Singapore, 1–3 September 2017; pp. 259–265. [Google Scholar]
  16. Bandyopadhyay, A.; Panda, R.K.; McNulty, T.F.; Mohammadi, F.; Danforth, S.C.; Safari, A. Piezoelectric ceramics and compo-sites via rapid prototyping techniques. Rapid Prototyp. J. 1998, 4, 37–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Smay, J.E.; Cesarano, J.; Lewis, J.A. Colloidal inks for directed assembly of 3-D periodic structures. Langmuir 2002, 18, 5429–5437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chen, Y.; Bao, X.; Wong, C.-M.; Cheng, J.; Wu, H.; Song, H.; Ji, X.; Wu, S. PZT ceramics fabricated based on stereolithography for an ultrasound transducer array application. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 22725–22730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cui, H.; Hensleigh, R.; Yao, D.; Maurya, D.; Kumar, P.; Kang, M.G.; Priya, S.; Zheng, X.R. Three-dimensional printing of piezoelectric materials with designed anisotropy and directional response. Nat. Mater. 2019, 18, 234–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lejeune, M.; Chartier, T.; Dossou-Yovo, C.; Noguera, R. Ink-jet printing of ceramic micro-pillar arrays. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2009, 29, 905–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wan, C.; Bowen, C.R. Multiscale-structuring of polyvinylidene fluoride for energy harvesting: The impact of molecular-, micro-and macro-structure. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 3091–3128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Kim, H.; Renteria-Marquez, A.; Islam, M.D.; Chavez, L.A.; Garcia Rosales, C.A.; Ahsan, M.A. Fabrication of bulk piezoelectric and dielectric BaTiO3 ceramics using paste extrusion 3D printing technique. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2018, 102, 3685–3694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Nadkarni, S.S.; Smay, J.E. Concentrated Barium Titanate Colloidal Gels Prepared by Bridging Flocculation for Use in Solid Freeform Fabrication. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2005, 89, 96–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Renteria, A.; Diaz, J.A.; He, B.; Renteria-Marquez, I.A.; Chavez, L.A.; Regis, J.E. Particle size influence on material properties of BaTiO3 ceramics fabricated using freeze-form extrusion 3D printing. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6, 115211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rowlands, W.; Vaidhyanathan, B. Additive manufacturing of barium titanate based ceramic heaters with positive temperature coefficient of resistance (PTCR). J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2019, 39, 3475–3483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chen, Z.; Song, X.; Lei, L.; Chen, X.; Fei, C.; Chiu, C.T. 3D printing of piezoelectric element for energy focusing and ultrasonic sensing. Nano Energy 2016, 27, 78–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Cheng, J.; Chen, Y.; Wu, J.-W.; Ji, Z.-R.; Wu, S.-H. 3D Printing of BaTiO3 Piezoelectric Ceramics for a Focused Ultrasonic Array. Sensors 2019, 19, 4078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Jang, J.H.; Wang, S.; Pilgrim, S.M.; Schulze, W.A. Preparation and characterization of barium titanate suspensions for stereolithography. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2000, 83, 1804–1806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kim, K.; Zhu, W.; Qu, X.; Aaronson, C.; McCall, W.R.; Chen, S. 3D optical printing of piezoelectric nanoparticle–polymer composite materials. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 9799–9806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Sotov, A.; Kantyukov, A.; Popovich, A.; Sufiiarov, V. LCD-SLA 3D printing of BaTiO3 piezoelectric ceramics. Ceram Int. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gaytan, S.M.; Cadena, M.A.; Karim, H.; Delfin, D.; Lin, Y.; Espalin, D.; MacDonald, E.; Wicker, R.B. Fabrication of barium titanate by binder jetting additive manufacturing technology. Ceram Int. 2015, 41, 6610–6619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Chavez, L.A.; Wilburn, B.R.; Ibave, P.; Delfin, L.C.; Vargas, S.; Diaz, H.; Fulgentes, C.; Renteria, A.; Regis, J.; Liu, Y.; et al. Fabrication and characterization of 3D printing induced orthotropic functional ceramics. Smart Mater. Struct. 2019, 28, 125007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chavez, L.A.; Ibave, P.; Wilburn, B.; Alexander, D.; Stewart, C.; Wicker, R.; Lin, Y. The influence of printing parameters, post-processing, and testing conditions on the properties of binder jetting additive manufactured functional ceramics. Ceramics 2020, 3, 65–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Polley, C.; Distler, T.; Detsch, R.; Lund, H.; Springer, A.; Boccaccini, A.R.; Seitz, H. 3D printing of piezoelectric barium titanate-hydroxyapatite scaffolds with interconnected porosity for bone tissue engineering. Materials 2020, 13, 1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Chen, Z.; Yang, M.; Ji, M.; Kuang, X.; Qi, H.J.; Wang, T. Recyclable thermosetting polymers for digital light processing 3D printing. Mater. Des. 2021, 197, 109189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sufiiarov, V.; Polozov, I.; Kantykov, A.; Khaidorov, A. Binder jetting additive manufacturing of 420 stainless steel: Densification during sintering and effect of heat treatment on microstructure and hardness. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 30, 592–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Polozov, I.; Sufiiarov, V.; Shamshurin, A. Synthesis of titanium orthorhombic alloy using binder jetting additive manufacturing. Mater. Lett. 2019, 243, 88–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Agapovichev, A.V.; Sotov, A.V.; Kokareva, V.V.; Smelov, V.G.; Kyarimov, R.R. Study of the structure and mechanical characteristics of samples obtained by selective laser melting technology from VT6 alloy metal powder. Nanosci. Technol. Int. J. 2017, 8, 323–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sufiiarov, V.; Kantyukov, A.; Polozov, I. Reaction sintering of metal-ceramic AlSI-Al2O3 composites manufactured by binder jetting additive manufacturing process. In Proceedings of the METAL 2020—29th International Conference on Metallurgy and Materials, Brno, Czech Republic, 20–22 May 2020; pp. 1148–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Do, T.; Kwon, P.; Shin, C.S. Process development toward full-density stainless steel parts with binder jetting printing. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 2017, 121, 50–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Acosta, M.; Novak, N.; Rojas, V.; Patel, S.; Vaish, R.; Koruza, J.; Rödel, J. BaTiO3-based piezoelectrics: Fundamentals, current status, and perspectives. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2017, 4, 041305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. SEM images of C-BaTiO3 powder at different magnifications: general view (a), agglomerate (b), powder particles (c).
Figure 1. SEM images of C-BaTiO3 powder at different magnifications: general view (a), agglomerate (b), powder particles (c).
Materials 14 04419 g001
Figure 2. SEM images of F-BaTiO3 powder at different magnifications: general view (a), powder particles (b).
Figure 2. SEM images of F-BaTiO3 powder at different magnifications: general view (a), powder particles (b).
Materials 14 04419 g002
Figure 3. Particle size distribution of F-BaTiO3 (a) and C-BaTiO3 (b).
Figure 3. Particle size distribution of F-BaTiO3 (a) and C-BaTiO3 (b).
Materials 14 04419 g003
Figure 4. Process flow for BJ additive manufacturing.
Figure 4. Process flow for BJ additive manufacturing.
Materials 14 04419 g004
Figure 5. The thermal post-treatment profile.
Figure 5. The thermal post-treatment profile.
Materials 14 04419 g005
Figure 6. TGA analysis of the binder.
Figure 6. TGA analysis of the binder.
Materials 14 04419 g006
Figure 7. Images of F-BaTiO3 samples printed by BJ with different saturation after sintering. Scale: each sample has a diameter of 15 mm and a height of 10 mm. Heating rate of 10 °C/min to 1400 °C with a dwell time of 4 h.
Figure 7. Images of F-BaTiO3 samples printed by BJ with different saturation after sintering. Scale: each sample has a diameter of 15 mm and a height of 10 mm. Heating rate of 10 °C/min to 1400 °C with a dwell time of 4 h.
Materials 14 04419 g007
Figure 8. Dependence of the density of samples on temperature and dwell time of sintering.
Figure 8. Dependence of the density of samples on temperature and dwell time of sintering.
Materials 14 04419 g008
Figure 9. Grain size of BaTiO3 samples dependence on temperature and dwell time of sintering.
Figure 9. Grain size of BaTiO3 samples dependence on temperature and dwell time of sintering.
Materials 14 04419 g009
Figure 10. SEM images of sintered samples microstructures at 1400 °C, a dwell time of 6 h from C-BaTiO3 (a) and F-BaTiO3 (b) powders.
Figure 10. SEM images of sintered samples microstructures at 1400 °C, a dwell time of 6 h from C-BaTiO3 (a) and F-BaTiO3 (b) powders.
Materials 14 04419 g010
Figure 11. XRD of a sample sintered at different temperatures.
Figure 11. XRD of a sample sintered at different temperatures.
Materials 14 04419 g011
Figure 12. Image of samples with lattice structures printing by BJ from F-BaTiO3 powder before (left) and after sintering (right).
Figure 12. Image of samples with lattice structures printing by BJ from F-BaTiO3 powder before (left) and after sintering (right).
Materials 14 04419 g012
Table 1. The main BJ parameters for BaTiO3 lead-free piezoceramic powder.
Table 1. The main BJ parameters for BaTiO3 lead-free piezoceramic powder.
Process ParameterC-BaTiO3 PowderF-BaTiO3 Powder
Recoating speed28 mm/s65 mm/s
Frequency of the oscillator5000 rpm4400 rpm
Layer thickness100 µm35 µm
Drying time25 s20 s
Drying temperature25 °C33 °C
Roller movement speed 1 mm/s1 mm/s
Table 2. Piezoelectric properties at 1 kHz of BaTiO3 samples printed by BJ process.
Table 2. Piezoelectric properties at 1 kHz of BaTiO3 samples printed by BJ process.
Technology/Powder Typeέtgδ, %kpd33, pC/N
Binder Jetting/C-BaTiO37505.530.15118
Traditional technology/C-BaTiO318727.90.22163
Binder Jetting/F-BaTiO381111.590.19183
Traditional technology/F-BaTiO323671.70.36230
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sufiiarov, V.; Kantyukov, A.; Popovich, A.; Sotov, A. Structure and Properties of Barium Titanate Lead-Free Piezoceramic Manufactured by Binder Jetting Process. Materials 2021, 14, 4419. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14164419

AMA Style

Sufiiarov V, Kantyukov A, Popovich A, Sotov A. Structure and Properties of Barium Titanate Lead-Free Piezoceramic Manufactured by Binder Jetting Process. Materials. 2021; 14(16):4419. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14164419

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sufiiarov, Vadim, Artem Kantyukov, Anatoliy Popovich, and Anton Sotov. 2021. "Structure and Properties of Barium Titanate Lead-Free Piezoceramic Manufactured by Binder Jetting Process" Materials 14, no. 16: 4419. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14164419

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop