Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Next Article in Journal
Assessment and Improvement of Urban Resilience to Flooding at a Subdistrict Level Using Multi-Source Geospatial Data: Jakarta as a Case Study
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of Water Yield Changes from 1981 to 2018 Using an Improved Mann-Kendall Test
Previous Article in Special Issue
Remote Sensing and GIS for Environmental Analysis and Cultural Heritage
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Kozioł K. and Maciuk K. New Heights of the Highest Peaks of Polish Mountain Ranges. Remote Sensing 2020, 12, 1446

Faculty of Mining Surveying and Environmental Engineering, AGH University of Science and Technology, Al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2022, 14(9), 2008; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14092008
Submission received: 21 December 2021 / Accepted: 19 April 2022 / Published: 22 April 2022

Text Correction

The authors wish to make the following corrections to this paper [1]:
There were three errors in the original article: “Folwarczna (height 724.7 m)” should be “Okole (height 725.3 m)”.
A correction has been made to:
  • In 2.3. LIDAR Analyses, Paragraph 2, Sentence 13:
Replace
The discrepancies between these values are quite significant, ranging from −4.2 m (Snieżnik, Table 1) to +1.8 m (Folwarczna, Table 2).
With
The discrepancies between these values are quite significant, ranging from −4.2 m (Snieżnik, Table 1) to +2.4 m (Okole, Table 2).
2.
Replace “Folwarczna 724.7” with “Okole 725.3” in Line “2”. The correct table is as follows:
Table 2. Heights and height differences between the official highest peaks and the newly established highest peaks.
Table 2. Heights and height differences between the official highest peaks and the newly established highest peaks.
MountainHighest PeakHO
(m)
New Highest PeakHN
(m)
ΔHN-O
(m)
HD
(m)
ΔHN-D
(m)
1Świętokrzyskie MtsŁysica613.6Skała Agaty614.00.4613.40.6
2Kaczawskie MtsSkopiec720.7Okole 725.34.0722.91.8
3Bardzkie MtsKłodzka Góra757.2Szeroka Góra766.39.1766.00.3
4Wałbrzyskie MtsChełmiec850Borowa 853.43.4853.40.0
5Rudawy Janowickie MtsSkalnik944.5Ostra Mała944.80.3944.40.4
6Bystrzyckie MtsJagodna977.2Jagodna Północna984.57.3985.1−0.6
7Bialskie MtsRudawiec1106.2Postawna 1115.59.31115.9−0.4
3.
In 3. Results, Paragraph 3, Sentence 4:
Replace
The only peak for which this value exceeded 1 m is the Folwarczna peak (Kaczawskie Mts) for which the difference was 1.8 m.
With
The only peak for which this value exceeded 1 m is the Okole peak (Kaczawskie Mts) for which the difference was 2.4 m.
The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused and state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. The original publication has also been updated.

Reference

  1. Kozioł, K.; Maciuk, K. New heights of the highest peaks of Polish mountain ranges. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kozioł, K.; Maciuk, K. Correction: Kozioł K. and Maciuk K. New Heights of the Highest Peaks of Polish Mountain Ranges. Remote Sensing 2020, 12, 1446. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 2008. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14092008

AMA Style

Kozioł K, Maciuk K. Correction: Kozioł K. and Maciuk K. New Heights of the Highest Peaks of Polish Mountain Ranges. Remote Sensing 2020, 12, 1446. Remote Sensing. 2022; 14(9):2008. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14092008

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kozioł, Krystian, and Kamil Maciuk. 2022. "Correction: Kozioł K. and Maciuk K. New Heights of the Highest Peaks of Polish Mountain Ranges. Remote Sensing 2020, 12, 1446" Remote Sensing 14, no. 9: 2008. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14092008

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop