Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Next Article in Journal
Spatial Transcriptomics and Single-Nucleus Multi-Omics Analysis Revealing the Impact of High Maternal Folic Acid Supplementation on Offspring Brain Development
Previous Article in Journal
Translational Algorithms for Technological Dietary Quality Assessment Integrating Nutrimetabolic Data with Machine Learning Methods
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluation of the Dietary Habits of Polish and Greek University Students in the Context of the Health Benefits of Their Diets

1
Department of Human Biology, The Faculty of Physical Education, Józef Piłsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw, 00-968 Warsaw, Poland
2
Department of Food Quality and Safety Management, Faculty of Food Science and Nutrition, Poznan University of Life Sciences, 60-637 Poznan, Poland
3
School of Physical Education and Sport Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 17237 Athens, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2024, 16(22), 3819; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16223819
Submission received: 3 September 2024 / Revised: 23 October 2024 / Accepted: 2 November 2024 / Published: 7 November 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Nutrition and Public Health)

Abstract

:
Background/Objectives: Eating habits and behaviors play a central role in maintaining health and overall well-being. In the case of young students, they affect not only appearance and general mood but also cognitive ability, concentration, and broader learning ability. For this reason, it is essential for young people to have well-balanced and wholesome diets. Methods: The study included 186 Polish and 136 Greek university students majoring in sports. The research tool was the validated survey questionnaire FFQ-6, and the data collected were additionally used to calculate the healthy diet index (pHDI-10). Results: Based on the analysis of the collected data, the dietary habits of the students surveyed were assessed, taking into account, among other things, the frequency of consumption of sweets, salty snacks, processed foods, and sweetened drinks, but also healthy products, including vegetables and fruit or vegetable and fruit juices. The data collected made it possible to determine an index of the health value of the participants’ diet. Conclusions: The analysis of the collected data led to the conclusion that, more often than their Greek peers, Polish university students tend to reach for sweets, salty snacks, or sweetened drinks. Greeks were more likely to choose fruit and vegetables and vegetable and fruit juices. However, among both Poles and Greeks, the index of the health-promoting value of the diet is low, indicating a high risk of diet-related diseases of lifestyle. Similar trends can be observed among students of almost all nationalities, which makes it reasonable to consider the implementation of appropriate educational programs on nutrition and healthy lifestyle principles in general.

1. Introduction

Eating behaviors result from eating patterns and daily habits developed over time by individuals. Examining the available evidence on diet helps to understand the relationship between dietary habits and health outcomes. Good eating habits are one of the most important elements of lifestyle. They are particularly important for young people during the intensive education and development periods. An adequate supply of nutrients, vitamins, and minerals during this period has an impact not only on physical development, the building of muscle mass, or the peak of bone mass but also on intellectual abilities, including the ability to learn [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14].
For many young people, tertiary education is when they leave the family home and begin living independently. Lack of parental control, frequent socializing with friends, a limited budget, and often a lack of time or facilities to prepare meals mean that young people’s eating habits frequently change considerably. The quality and number of meals change, main meals are replaced by sweet or salty snacks, and fast food consumption often increases. As shown in the study by Moscatelli et al., negative changes do not necessarily have to be the rule. In the multicenter study they cited, it was observed that students in Turkey, Romania, Croatia, and Lebanon exhibited a greater tendency toward unhealthy behaviors. On the other hand, students from Spain and Italy tended to engage in health-promoting behaviors [15].
On the other hand, energy drinks high in sugar, caffeine, and taurine are consumed by young people in an attempt to compensate for sleep deprivation. College is also a time for establishing new relationships, accompanied by numerous social meetings that also encourage changes in eating habits, not only in the daily rhythm of food intake but also in the type of food. Social gatherings are often accompanied by high intakes of salty and sweet snacks and various alcoholic drinks [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25].
An additional factor that may influence dietary changes during the university period seems to be the economic aspect. The need to manage a usually limited budget and a lack of time, while simultaneously meeting multiple needs, may lead to the decision to purchase lower-quality and more readily available products.
A separate aspect is meal planning and shopping for meal preparation. It has been observed that students who remain in the family home during their studies show a significantly lower tendency to change their eating habits in a negative direction, as they remain under family care, and the responsibility for meal planning and shopping often does not fall on them. On the other hand, students who leave the family home tend to experience a greater decline in their dietary habits [15].
Irregular and incomplete meals can affect several aspects of physical and mental health, and frequent consumption of convenience foods, highly processed foods, and alcohol negatively affects general health, well-being, life satisfaction, sleep quality, concentration, memory, and learning ability, which are particularly taxed during the study process [26,27,28,29,30].
Eating habits and dietary choices vary from country to country. However, the principles of healthy eating have a fairly universal and international dimension. The cultural specificity of eating patterns, ingredient selection and availability, seasonality of foods, or social habits, especially among the younger members of society worldwide, are increasingly being displaced by the prevalence, availability, and affordability of fast food, sugary snacks, and energy drinks. This is leading to an increase in the prevalence of obesity, type II diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and a range of other lifestyle diseases [18,20,22,25,27,29,31,32,33,34].
The school year seems to be a very good time to educate young people about health. After previous stages of education, young people already have sufficient theoretical knowledge of the principles of a healthy lifestyle, are aware of the consequences of bad health habits, and, at the same time, are mature enough to understand the long-term consequences of their health behavior choices. Education to achieve this goal therefore seems to be highly justified [19,20,21,22,24,32,33,34].
The study aimed to compare and evaluate the dietary habits of Polish students at the Józef Piłsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw (Poland) and Greek students at the Kapodistrian University of Athens (Greece) in terms of health behavior, body weight, and the health-promoting value of their diets. A survey on the availability of health-promoting and unhealthy products revealed that participants from both environments, despite significant differences in the characteristics of local cuisine, have similar access to such products. Therefore, their dietary choices are primarily influenced by their personal decisions rather than by limitations in the availability of health-promoting or unhealthy products. For this reason, it was assumed that the study would be exploratory, and no research hypotheses were formulated.

2. Materials and Methods

The study material consisted of 186 Polish students studying at the Józef Piłsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw and 137 Greek students studying at the Kapadostrias University in Athens. Students at both universities studied sports.
The study used the Food Frequency Questionnaire with 6 answers (FFQ-6), consisting of 62 questions on the consumption of different product groups in the last 12 months, divided into 8 sections: sweets and snacks, dairy products and eggs, cereals, fats, fruit, vegetables and cereals, meat products and fish, and beverages [35]. Based on the obtained data, it is possible to identify individuals with varying levels of consumption frequency for specific products and/or to distinguish characteristic food consumption patterns within the evaluated population.
The original questionnaire was written in Polish. For the study, it was also translated into Greek, using a nomenclature referring to analogous product groups and the products available in both countries. The data collected allowed an analysis of the dietary habits of the respondents in general. Taking into account the varying frequency of consumption, including health-promoting products, the decision was taken to also analyze the collected data in terms of the pro-health value of the diet using the Pro-Healthy Diet Index (pHDI-10) (Table 1). The pHDI-10 Index is used to calculate the health-promoting properties of a diet and is based on the consumption of 10 food groups, whose frequency of intake was assessed using the FFQ-6 questionnaire. These food groups were derived from the FFQ-6 based on current guidelines on healthy eating principles. The collected data were applied to the following formula: Pro-Healthy Diet Index (pHDI-10, in points) = (100/20) × the sum of the consumption frequency of 10 food groups (times/day) [36,37].
Due to the nature of the research tool, which was a questionnaire, it was not possible to assess factors such as the body composition of the participants. Therefore, the study was limited to the BMI index, which was used to evaluate the participants’ body weight. Body mass index was calculated as kg/m2 and categorized into underweight (BMI < 18.5), normal weight (18.5–24.9), overweight (25–29.9), and obese (≥30), following the international BMI classification. BMI was calculated by dividing the body mass in kilograms by the square of height in meters. The international classification was applied, where a BMI value of <18.5 indicates underweight, 18.5–24.9 is normal, 25–29.9 is overweight, and ≥30 is obesity [22]. The obtained values were compared with the pHDI-10 to assess which students (underweight, normal weight, overweight, or obese) had the most health-promoting diets.
All students were provided with an online version of the questionnaire in Polish or Greek using MS Forms. Before distributing the questionnaire to respondents, a cross-translation of the text was conducted in both groups to increase the reliability of the questionnaire. Both research teams discussed the consistency of the meaning of the questions in the Polish and Greek versions. The recruitment of participants was carried out randomly. Participation in the study was voluntary, and before completing the questionnaire, participants were informed about the study’s purpose, the intended use of the collected data, and the anonymity of the study. The study was conducted based on the approval of the Ethics Committee of the Senate of the Józef Piłsudski Academy of Physical Education in Warsaw, which the Kapadistrias University of Athens accepted. Inclusion criteria were confirmation of being a student at the university, participating in the study, and informed consent for participation, confirmed by voluntary completion of the study questionnaire. Exclusion criteria were not being a student of the participating universities and refusing to participate in the study.
Statistical analysis and visualization of the collected data were performed using Statistica 13.3. To characterize the study groups, the mean, median, and standard deviation were calculated for the representatives of both nationalities. Pearson’s chi-squared test was used to test the relationship between qualitative variables such as frequency of consumption of selected food meals (Never or rarely, Once a month or less, Several times a month, Several times a week, and Daily Several times a day) and country of origin (Poland, Greece). The significance level was set at α = 0.05. The following abbreviations and symbols were used: p—statistical significance; if p < 0.05, there was a significant difference between the groups.
Additionally, Correspondence Analysis (CA) was performed. This method is used to examine relationships between categorical variables, visualized on a two-dimensional contingency plot. In this study, it was carried out by analyzing and visualizing food groups that have similar or different “profiles”, meaning the relative frequency of consumption depending on the origin of the study group (Poland—1, Greece—2). The CA plot presents a visualization of the chi-square deviations (inertia) of consumption frequencies from their respective average profile.

3. Results

Table 2 shows the characteristics of the study participants. It was found that the vast majority of respondents from both nationalities—approximately 80%—had a normal BMI value, which is significant information in the context of the analyzed parameters.
Based on the data collected in Table 3, there were statistically significant differences between Polish and Greek students in the intake of biscuits and cakes, salty snacks, dairy products, whole meal and refined bread, oil and butter, vegetables and fruit, and poultry and red meat: Polish students were much more likely to consume refined and processed products, while Greek students were more likely to consume dairy products, oil, and vegetables.
The frequency of consumption of selected types of beverages among the participants is summarized in Table 4. Statistically significant differences were observed in the consumption of vegetable and vegetable–fruit juices and sweetened beverages, as well as beer, wine, and alcoholic drinks by Polish and Greek respondents. Polish students consumed sweetened drinks, beer, wine, and soft drinks more frequently than their Greek peers (several times a month), while Greek students consumed vegetable and vegetable–fruit juices daily and wine and soft drinks several times a week. However, there were no statistically significant differences in the consumption of vodka and spirits.
Based on the data collected in Table 5, it can be concluded that a low probability of a favorable level of the pHDI-10 index is prevalent among the respondents. Only slightly more than 4% of the respondents were in the medium probability range of a healthy diet, and none of the study participants were in the high probability range. It can therefore be assumed that the distribution of the pHDI-10 healthy diet index in the study group was unfavorable.
Analysis of the data presented in Table 6 shows that there was no statistically significant difference between Polish and Greek students in the low probability of a healthy diet, while in the moderate category, the distribution of the data was the same, but this group was very small among both Poles and Greeks. None of the respondents of either nationality was in the high likelihood category.
Table 7 shows the percentage of Polish and Greek students surveyed by pHDI-10 index ranges with regards to their nutritional status as determined by BMI. For both Polish and Greek students, no statistically significant correlations were found between pHDI-10 index ranges and BMI categories. The proportions of respondents characterized as having a low and moderate likelihood of their diet being healthy are similar for each BMI category in both countries. However, there is a predominance of respondents in the low category, indicating a low index of their diet being healthy.
To illustrate multidimensional deviations (inertia) reduced to the two most informative dimensions, a correspondence table/plot was created (Figure 1). The distance between the row and column profile points, as well as the direction in which they are displaced from the origin, indicates their relationship (the relationship is stronger if the points are located in similar directions from the origin). The first axis (horizontal) accounts for the largest share of inertia (16.74%) and is therefore the best dimension for explaining most of the variation between the rows. On the plot, this axis distinguishes two groups: on the far left, mostly products considered unhealthy, and on the right, products considered healthy.

4. Discussion

Good nutrition is a key factor in the maintenance of good health and the prevention of lifestyle diseases. It is extremely important at all stages of life, but it is especially relevant for young people, who are undergoing physical development while at the same time undergoing considerable mental stress as a result of the educational process. The considerable energy expenditure caused by both physical and mental exertion must be balanced by an appropriate diet rich in essential nutrients. A properly composed diet not only meets the needs for essential building components and energy but also helps maintain an optimal body weight. Among the study participants, the vast majority of students of both nationalities had a normal body weight, with mean values in the lower half of the range predicted for a normal body weight. Similar observations were made by Król et al. [38], who studied Polish, Portuguese, and Belarusian university students, and by Alghadir et al. [39] in a study of Saudi, Egyptian, Indian, Pakistani, and Afghan students. García-Meseguer’s [40] team, who carried out a study involving Spanish students, Dakanalis et al. [41], who analyzed the dietary habits of Greek students from different universities, and Spanos and Hankey [31], who compared Scottish and Greek students, also recognized this trend. However, in all these cases, the researchers found that the average BMI was at or above 22. This means that respondents from all groups were in the top half of the norm on the scale. It can therefore be seen that the average BMI of students of different nationalities is within the normal range, but the BMI of sports university students is lower.
A student lifestyle, due to its heavy course load, favors the consumption of readily available processed and energy-dense foods. Based on the data collected, the consumption of processed foods, sweets, salty snacks, and sweetened beverages was found to be more common among Polish than Greek students. Vegetables, dairy products, and fruit and vegetable juices were preferred by Greek students. Observations indicating the unfavorable eating habits of students have been made by, among others, Park and Papadaki [17], who conducted a study among British students who used food vending machines choosing sweets and salty snacks, or Spanos and Hankey [31], who examined Scottish and Greek students. It is noteworthy that the second group of researchers made similar observations about the dietary choices of Greeks to those presented in the paper, with Greek students less likely to choose salty snacks and sweets than their Scottish peers. An analysis of other studies shows that Malaysian students have a preference for sweet snacks and fruit [19]. Chinese students, on the other hand, have good eating habits [22]. They eat large amounts of green vegetables, fish, and meat, and very few fast food products compared to international students studying in China. This may be indicative of habits acquired before university. Yahia et al. [20] showed in their study that despite the growing trend of fast food in Lebanon, students still have quite good eating habits. More than 30% of the respondents reported consuming colorful vegetables and fruits daily. Similar observations were made by El Ansari et al. [24] who surveyed Finnish students. They found a rather high preference for sweets but at the same time a high consumption of vegetables. However, not in all areas of the world do students eat healthily. Rivera Medina et al. [23], in their study, found that students in Puerto Rico preferred fried foods and fizzy drinks and did not eat enough fruit, vegetables, and dairy products. Martinez-Perez et al. [18], in a study of Spanish students, also found a preference for sweets, salty snacks, and sugary drinks, which were preferred more often than foods described as healthy. However, this study also highlighted an important factor that may determine unhealthy food choices: when analyzing students’ alcohol consumption, a common trend, similar to that observed in this paper, is that students tend to consume low levels of or no alcohol. Spirits are not very popular among students.
The analysis of the healthy diet index showed that the dietary habits of the respondents urgently need improvement. More than 90% of the students were in the group with a low healthy diet index. This means a high predisposition to diet-related lifestyle diseases. A similar trend was shown in Polish students as well as those from other academic centers: Spanish, Chilean, or Romanian [42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49]. All the respondents came from sports universities and their average BMI was within the normal range. This indicates that students, including those from sports universities, where the level of nutritional education seems to be very high, need to be included in a preventive program aimed at preventing diet-related lifestyle diseases.

5. Conclusions

The analysis of the collected data leads to the conclusion that the respondents of both Polish and Greek nationality are predominantly of normal body weight. A small percentage of the participants of both groups had a BMI indicating overweight/obesity, but given that they were students of universities of physical education, such a result could also be due to high muscle mass. To enhance the credibility of the study, an analysis of participants’ body composition and a more comprehensive assessment of their health status would be necessary. However, the study was a pilot, and the research tool used—a questionnaire—did not allow for the collection of such data. It was also noted that Polish students are more likely to choose sweets, salty snacks, and processed foods compared to their Greek peers who are more likely to choose vegetables and dairy products. They are more likely to opt for sweetened drinks, while Greeks are more likely to choose vegetables, fruit, and vegetable juices. Compared to the Poles, Greeks were slightly more likely to consume low-proof spirits, while no significant difference was found between the study groups for the consumption of high-proof spirits. Eating habits indicating a low probability of a healthy diet index are prevalent among the respondents. Few participants, in similar proportions for both nationalities, showed a moderate probability of a healthy diet, and no participants showed a low probability of a healthy diet. Therefore, it can be concluded that the diet of the vast majority of participants of both nationalities has characteristics predisposing to the development of lifestyle diseases and therefore in need of intervention. None of the study groups showed any correlation between BMI and the probability of a healthy diet index.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.W., M.M. and A.D.; methodology, M.M. and P.W.; software, Ł.T.; validation, P.W., M.M. and A.D.; formal analysis, P.W., M.M. and Ł.T.; investigation, M.M., P.W., A.D., G.P. (Georgia Panagiotakou), and G.P. (Georgia Papoulia); resources, P.W., M.M., A.D, G.P. (Georgia Panagiotakou), and G.P. (Georgia Papoulia); data curation, P.W., M.M. and A.D.; writing—original draft preparation, P.W. and M.M.; writing—review and editing, P.W.; visualization, Ł.T.; supervision, P.W. and M.M.; project administration, P.W.; funding acquisition, P.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The publication was funded by the university’s research funds.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted by the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of Józef Pilsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw, Poland, protocol code SKE 01-08/2024 and date of approval 22 April 2024.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

All data are stored with the authors of the publication and can be made available upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Li, B.; Tang, X.; Le, G. Dietary Habits and Metabolic Health. Nutrients 2023, 15, 3975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. De Toro-Martín, J.; Arsenault, B.J.; Després, J.P.; Vohl, M.C. Precision Nutrition: A Review of Personalized Nutritional Approaches for the Prevention and Management of Metabolic Syndrome. Nutrients 2017, 9, 913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Geraets, A.F.J.; Heinz, A. The associations of dietary habits with health, well-being, and behavior in adolescents: A cluster analysis. Child Care Health Dev. 2023, 49, 497–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Loughman, A.; Staudacher, H.M.; Rocks, T.; Ruusunen, A.; Marx, W.; Apos, O.; Neil, A.; Jacka, F.N. Diet and Mental Health. Mod. Trends Psychiatry 2021, 32, 100–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. van den Hooven, E.H.; Heppe, D.H.; Kiefte-de Jong, J.C.; Medina-Gomez, C.; Moll, H.A.; Hofman, A.; Jaddoe, V.W.; Rivadeneira, F.; Franco, O.H. Infant dietary patterns and bone mass in childhood: The Generation R Study. Osteoporos. Int. 2015, 26, 1595–1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Movassagh, E.Z.; Vatanparast, H. Current Evidence on the Association of Dietary Patterns and Bone Health: A Scoping Review. Adv. Nutr. 2017, 8, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Denova-Gutiérrez, E.; Méndez-Sánchez, L.; Muñoz-Aguirre, P.; Tucker, K.L.; Clark, P. Dietary Patterns, Bone Mineral Density, and Risk of Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jirout, J.; LoCasale-Crouch, J.; Turnbull, K.; Gu, Y.; Cubides, M.; Garzione, S.; Evans, T.M.; Weltman, A.L.; Kranz, S. How Lifestyle Factors Affect Cognitive and Executive Function and the Ability to Learn in Children. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Naveed, S.; Lakka, T.; Haapala, E.A. An Overview on the Associations between Health Behaviors and Brain Health in Children and Adolescents with Special Reference to Diet Quality. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Osuchukwu, E.C.; Agba, M.; Anieche, J.E.; Agbor, E.O.; Obeten, J.N. Awareness and preventive practices of obesity among young women in Calabar South Local Government Area of Cross River State. Biomed. Hum. Kinet. 2023, 15, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Alioto, A.; Rossi, C.; Capano, S.; Amato, A.; Baldassano, S.; Pagliaro, A.; Lauriello, G.; Kuliś, S.; Proia, P. Biochemical assessment of insulin and vitamin D levels in obese adolescents after diet and physical activity: A retrospective observational study. Biomed. Hum. Kinet. 2023, 15, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Naghoni, B.K.; Kęska, A.; Ebrahimi, M. The effect of milk consumption with different temperatures after resistance exercise on appetite and energy intake in active girls: A pilot study. Biomed. Hum. Kinet. 2024, 16, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Choudhary, A.; Singh, P.; Singh, M.; Singh Dhillon, K.M. Knock knee deformity and body mass index among the male school students of 9 to 13 years old of chandigarh, India. Biomed. Hum. Kinet. 2023, 15, 185–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Detopoulou, P.; Dedes, V.; Syka, D.; Tzirogiannis, K.; Panoutsopoulos, G.I. Mediterranean Diet, a Posteriori Dietary Patterns, Time-Related Meal Patterns and Adiposity: Results from a Cross-Sectional Study in University Students. Diseases 2022, 10, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Moscatelli, F.; De Maria, A.; Marinaccio, L.A.; Monda, W.; Messina, A.; Monacis, D.; Toto, G.; Limone, P.; Monda, M.; Messina, G.; et al. Assessment of Lifestyle, Eating Habits and the Effect of Nutritional Education among Undergraduate Students in Southern Italy. Nutrients 2023, 15, 2894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Papadaki, A.; Hondros, G.A.; Scott, J.; Kapsokefalou, M. Eating habits of university students living at, or away from home in Greece. Appetite 2007, 49, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Park, H.; Papadaki, A. Nutritional value of foods sold in vending machines in a UK University: Formative, cross-sectional research to inform an environmental intervention. Appetite 2016, 96, 517–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Martinez-Perez, N.; Arroyo-Izaga, M. Availability, Nutritional Profile and Processing Level of Food Products Sold in Vending Machines in a Spanish Public University. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 6842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gan, W.Y.; Mohd, N.M.; Zalilah, M.S.; Hazizi, A.S. Differences in eating behaviors, dietary intake and body weight status between male and female Malaysian University students. Malays. J. Nutr. 2011, 17, 213–228. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  20. Yahia, N.; Achkar, A.; Abdallah, A.; Rizk, S. Eating habits and obesity among Lebanese university students. Nutr. J. 2008, 7, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Musaiger, A.O.; Awadhalla, M.S.; Al-Mannai, M.; AlSawad, M.; Asokan, G.V. Dietary habits and sedentary behaviors among health science university students in Bahrain. Int. J. Adolesc. Med. Health 2017, 29, 20150038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ul Haq, I.; Mariyam, Z.; Li, M.; Huang, X.; Jiang, P.; Zeb, F.; Wu, X.; Feng, Q.; Zhou, M.A. Comparative Study of Nutritional Status, Knowledge Attitude and Practices (KAP) and Dietary Intake between International and Chinese Students in Nanjing, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Rivera Medina, C.; Briones Urbano, M.; de Jesús Espinosa, A.; Toledo López, Á. Eating Habits Associated with Nutrition-Related Knowledge among University Students Enrolled in Academic Programs Related to Nutrition and Culinary Arts in Puerto Rico. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. El Ansari, W.; Suominen, S.; Samara, A. Eating Habits and Dietary Intake: Is Adherence to Dietary Guidelines Associated with Importance of Healthy Eating among Undergraduate University Students in Finland? Cent. Eur. J. Public Health 2015, 23, 306–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Moreno-Gómez, C.; Romaguera-Bosch, D.; Tauler-Riera, P.; Bennasar-Veny, M.; Pericas-Beltran, J.; Martinez-Andreu, S.; Aguilo-Pons, A. Clustering of lifestyle factors in Spanish university students: The relationship between smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity and diet quality. Public Health Nutr. 2012, 15, 2131–2139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Popkin, B.M.; Barquera, S.; Corvalan, C.; Hofman, K.J.; Monteiro, C.; Ng, S.W.; Swart, E.C.; Taillie, L.S. Towards unified and impactful policies to reduce ultra-processed food consumption and promote healthier eating. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021, 9, 462–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gupta, P.; Shah, D.; Kumar, P.; Bedi, N.; Mittal, H.G.; Mishra, K.; Khalil, S.; Elizabeth, K.E.; Dalal, R.; Harish, R.; et al. Pediatric and Adolescent Nutrition Society (Nutrition Chapter) Of Indian Academy of Pediatrics. Indian Academy of Pediatrics Guidelines on the Fast and Junk Foods, Sugar Sweetened Beverages, Fruit Juices, and Energy Drinks. Indian Pediatr. 2019, 56, 849–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Martini, D.; Godos, J.; Bonaccio, M.; Vitaglione, P.; Grosso, G. Ultra-Processed Foods and Nutritional Dietary Profile: A Meta-Analysis of Nationally Representative Samples. Nutrients 2021, 13, 3390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Crimarco, A.; Landry, M.J.; Gardner, C.D. Ultra-processed Foods, Weight Gain, and Co-morbidity Risk. Curr. Obes. Rep. 2022, 11, 80–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Andreeva, V.A.; Perez-Jimenez, J.; St-Onge, M.P. A Systematic Review of the Bidirectional Association Between Consumption of Ultra-processed Food and Sleep Parameters Among Adults. Curr. Obes. Rep. 2023, 12, 439–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Spanos, D.; Hankey, C.R. The habitual meal and snacking patterns of university students in two countries and their use of vending machines. J. Hum. Nutr. Diet. 2010, 23, 102–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Vergetaki, A.; Linardakis, M.; Papadaki, A.; Kafatos, A. Presence of metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk factors in adolescents and University students in Crete (Greece), according to different levels of snack consumption. Appetite 2011, 57, 278–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Cooke, R.; Papadaki, A. Nutrition label use mediates the positive relationship between nutrition knowledge and attitudes towards healthy eating with dietary quality among university students in the UK. Appetite 2014, 83, 297–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ng, K.W.; Sangster, J.; Priestly, J. Assessing the availability, price, nutritional value and consumer views about foods and beverages from vending machines across university campuses in regional New South Wales, Australia. Health Promot. J. Aust. 2019, 30, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gronowska-Senger, A. (Ed.) Przewodnik Metodyczny Badań Sposobu Żywienia; Komitet Nauki o Żywieniu Człowieka Polskiej Akademii Nauk: Warszawa, Poland, 2013; ISBN 978-83-63305-09-3. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kolarzyk, E.; Kwiatkowski, J.; Skop-Lewandowska, A. Ocena jakości diety kobiet o różnym stanie odżywienia, przy użyciu Indeksu Prozdrowotnej Diety (pHDI-10)/Evaluation of diet quality in women with different nutritional status using pro-Healthy Diet Index (pHDI-10). Probl. Hig. Epidemiol. 2017, 98, 177–182. [Google Scholar]
  37. Ratajczak, J.; Czerniak, U.; Wieliński, D.; Ciekot-Sołtysiak, M.; Zieliński, J.; Gronek, P.; Demuth, A. Pro-Healthy Diet Properties and Its Determinants among Aging Masters Athletes. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 7614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Król, M.; Latosiewicz, R.; Marques Brás, R.M.; Barkow, W.; Zuzda, J.G. of physical activity of students in Poland, Portugal and Belarus. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 2022, 29, 126–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Alghadir, A.H.; Iqbal, Z.A.; Gabr, S.A. Differences among Saudi and Expatriate Students: Body Composition Indices, Sitting Time Associated with Media Use and Physical Activity Pattern. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. García-Meseguer, M.J.; Cervera Burriel, F.; Vico García, C.; Serrano-Urrea, R. Adherence to Mediterranean diet in a Spanish university population. Appetite 2014, 78, 156–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dakanalis, A.; Voulgaridou, G.; Alexatou, O.; Papadopoulou, S.K.; Jacovides, C.; Pritsa, A.; Chrysafi, M.; Papacosta, E.; Kapetanou, M.G.; Tsourouflis, G.; et al. Overweight and Obesity Is Associated with Higher Risk of Perceived Stress and Poor Sleep Quality in Young Adults. Medicina 2024, 60, 983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gacek, M.; Kosiba, G.; Wojtowicz, A. Personality Determinants of Diet Quality among Polish and Spanish Physical Education Students. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Popławska, H.; Dmitruk, A.; Kunicka, I.; Dębowska, A.; Hołub, W. Habits and knowledge about food and nutrition among physical education students depending on their level of higher education and physical activity. Pol. J. Sport. Tour. 2018, 25, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Skrzypek, A.; Szeliga, M.; Stalmach-Przygoda, A.; Kowalska, B.; Jabłoński, K.; Nowakowski, M. Analysis of Lifestyle and Risk Factors of Atherosclerosis in Students of Selected Universities in Krakow. Przegl. Lek. 2016, 73, 316–319. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  45. Ilow, R.; Regulska-Ilow, B.; Różańska, D. Dietary Habits of Wroclaw Medical University Students (Poland). Rocz. Panstw. Zakl. Hig. 2017, 68, 23–32. [Google Scholar]
  46. Szczuko, M.; Gutowska, I.; Seidler, T. Nutrition and nourishment status of Polish students in comparison with students from other countries. Rocz. Panstw. Zakl. Hig. 2015, 66, 261–268. [Google Scholar]
  47. Valdes-Badilla, P.; Godoy-Cumillaf, A.; Herrera-Valenzula, T.; Durán-Agüero, S. The comparison between food habits and physical condition among physical education and other undergraduate students. Nutr. Hosp. 2015, 32, 829–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Chacón-Cuberos, R.; Badicu, G.; Zurita-Ortega, F.; Castro-Sánchez, M. Mediterranean Diet and Motivation in Sport: A Comparative Study Between University Students from Spain and Romania. Nutrients 2018, 11, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Navarro-Prado, S.; González-Jiménez, E.; Montero-Alonso, M.A.; López-Bueno, M.; Schmidt-RioValle, J. Lifestyle and monitoring of the dietary intake of students at the Melilla campus of the University of Granada. Nutr. Hosp. 2015, 31, 2651–2659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Correspondence table of the relationship between the consumption frequency of selected food products and the origin of the respondents. Explanation of the numbers in the figure: 1—Sugar for sweetening beverages; 2—Non-chocolate candies; 3—Biscuits and cookies; 4—Salty snacks; 5—Refined bread; 6—Refined fine-grain groats; 7—Other animal fats; 8—Sausages, various types; 9—Red meat, e.g., pork, beef, veal; 10—Energy drinks; 11—Sweetened beverages; 12—Vodka and high-proof alcohol; 13—Milk and natural milk beverages; 14—Natural cottage cheese; 15—Eggs and egg-based dishes where eggs are the primary ingredient; 16—Whole grain or seeded bread; 17—Coarse, unrefined groats; 18—Fruits, of all kinds; 19—Vegetables, of all kinds; 20—Dried legumes and seeds; 21—Nuts and nut butters; 22—Poultry and rabbit meat; 23—Lean fish; 24—Fatty fish.
Figure 1. Correspondence table of the relationship between the consumption frequency of selected food products and the origin of the respondents. Explanation of the numbers in the figure: 1—Sugar for sweetening beverages; 2—Non-chocolate candies; 3—Biscuits and cookies; 4—Salty snacks; 5—Refined bread; 6—Refined fine-grain groats; 7—Other animal fats; 8—Sausages, various types; 9—Red meat, e.g., pork, beef, veal; 10—Energy drinks; 11—Sweetened beverages; 12—Vodka and high-proof alcohol; 13—Milk and natural milk beverages; 14—Natural cottage cheese; 15—Eggs and egg-based dishes where eggs are the primary ingredient; 16—Whole grain or seeded bread; 17—Coarse, unrefined groats; 18—Fruits, of all kinds; 19—Vegetables, of all kinds; 20—Dried legumes and seeds; 21—Nuts and nut butters; 22—Poultry and rabbit meat; 23—Lean fish; 24—Fatty fish.
Nutrients 16 03819 g001
Table 1. Pro-Healthy Diet Index interpretation.
Table 1. Pro-Healthy Diet Index interpretation.
Probability of Pro-Healthy Diet PropertiesRange (Times Per Day)Range (Points)
low0.00–6.661–33
moderate6.67–13.3334–66
high13.34–2067–100
Table 2. Characterization of study participants.
Table 2. Characterization of study participants.
CountryAge
(Years)
Height (Centimeters)Weight
(Kilograms)
Poland
N (186)
19.7 ± 0.47182 ± 8.7766.3 ± 13.04
Greece
N (137)
22.3 ± 5.27170.7 ± 8.8364.1 ± 11.35
BMINN
PolandNormal BMI [%]14879.56
Overweight/Obese [%]3217.20
Underweight [%]63.22
GreeceNormal BMI [%]11483.21
Overweight/Obese [%]1611.67
Underweight [%]75.10
Table 3. Characteristics of the frequency of consumption of selected food groups among participants.
Table 3. Characteristics of the frequency of consumption of selected food groups among participants.
Food ProductsCountryTotal Np *chi2
PolandGreece
Biscuits and cakesSeveral times a day100.00%0.00%10.0006 **22.41
(e.g., shortbread, semi-shortbread, cream-filled, fruit, yeast-based, cheesecakes, donuts, poppy seed cakes, pastries, muffins, etc.)Daily20.00%80.00%5
Several times a week65.85%34.15%41
Several times a month67.63%32.64%144
Once a month or less48.67%51.33%58
Never or almost never26.32%73.68%19
Salty snacks (e.g., chips, salted crisps, crackers, pretzels, etc.)Several times a day0.00%0.00%00.0001 **64.71
Daily100.00%0.00%1
Several times a week72.73%27.27%44
Several times a month65.00%35.00%49
Once a month or less52.83%47.17%50
Never or almost never18.75%81.25%32
Milk and natural dairy drinksSeveral times a day32.25%68.75%160.0001 **45.33
(e.g., milk, milk soups, natural yogurt, kefir, natural buttermilk, etc.)Daily36.05%63.95%86
Several times a week60.00%40.00%95
Several times a month75.86%24.14%87
Once a month or less64.00%36.00%25
Never or almost never78.57%21.43%14
Eggs and dishes where eggs areSeveral times a day100.00%0.00%20.766721.47
the main ingredient (e.g.,Daily42.86%57.14%42
scrambledSeveral times a week61.54%38.46%130
eggs, omelet, egg pasta,Several times a month61.26%38.74%111
boiled eggs, etc.)Once a month or less41.94%58.06%31
Never or almost never66.67%33.33%6
Whole grain or seeded bread,Several times a day60.00%40.00%50.0168 **26.32
also known as dark bread (e.g.,Daily50.94%49.06%53
rye whole grain bread, graham bread, wheat or rye bread with seeds, pumpernickel, etc.)Several times a week69.39%30.61%98
Several times a month64.13%35.87%92
Once a month or less40.00%60.00%55
Never or almost never35.00%65.00%20
Refined bread, commonly known as white bread (e.g.,Several times a day71.43%28.57%70.00001 **28.64
white wheatDaily63.27%36.73%49
or rye bread, wheat-rye bread,Several times a week74.00%26.00%100
toast bread, plain rolls, buns and croissants, etc.)Several times a month61.64%38.36%73
Once a month or less34.38%65.63%64
Never or almost never30.00%70.00%30
Oils, all typesSeveral times a day12.50%87.50%80.00001 **33.67
Daily14.49%85.51%69
Several times a week61.00%39.00%100
Several times a month73.12%26.88%93
Once a month or less85.37%14.63%41
Never or almost never91.67%8.33%12
Butter, all typesSeveral times a day100.00%0.00%70.00001 **84.21
Daily87.10%12.90%31
Several times a week79.41%20.59%68
Several times a month54.95%45.05%91
Once a month or less29.23%70.77%65
Never or almost never47.54%52.46%61
Fruits, all typesSeveral times a day48.48%51.52%330.0061 **41.33
Daily50.00%50.00%84
Several times a week71.88%28.13%128
Several times a month48.39%51.61%62
Once a month or less50.00%50.00%12
Never or almost never0.00%100.00%4
Vegetables, all typesSeveral times a day43.48%56.52%230.04501 **44.23
Daily59.60%40.40%99
Several times a week64.29%35.71%126
Several times a month53.57%46.43%56
Once a month or less41.67%58.33%12
Never or almost never14.29%85.71%7
Red meat (e.g., pork, beef, veal, etc.)Daily46.67%53.33%150.00158 **33.21
Several times a week53.42%46.58%73
Several times a month51.08%48.92%139
Once a month or less62.07%37.93%58
Never or almost never86.84%13.16%38
Poultry and rabbit meat (e.g., poultry meat from chicken, hen, duck, turkey, etc.)Several times a day0.00%100.00%10.01187 **11.23
Daily48.00%52.00%25
Several times a week57.55%42.45%139
Several times a month52.21%47.79%113
Once a month or less63.64%36.36%22
Never or almost never91.30%8.70%23
Fatty fish (e.g., salmon, sardines, herring, mackerel, large carp, eel, etc.)Several times a week57.14%42.86%140.145522.84
Several times a month67.53%32.47%77
Once a month or less57.72%42.28%123
Never or almost never50.46%49.54%109
* Pearson chi-squared test; ** Significant dependencies at the α = 0.05 level.
Table 4. Characteristics of the frequency of consumption of selected beverages among participants.
Table 4. Characteristics of the frequency of consumption of selected beverages among participants.
Food ProductsCountryTotal N p *chi2
PolandGreece
Vegetable and vegetable–fruitNever or almost never51.75%48.25%1140.01101 **47.63
juices (e.g., mixed vegetable, Once a month or less66.67%33.33%90
tomato, carrot, carrot-fruit, etc.)Several times a month62.67%37.33%75
Several times a week55.88%44.12%34
Daily12.50%87.50%8
Several times a day0.00%100.00%2
Sweetened beveragesNever or almost never44.87%55.13%780.00052 **55.01
(e.g., Fanta, Coca-Cola, Mirinda, Sprite, etc.)Once a month or less48.15%51.85%108
Several times a month70.51%29.49%78
Several times a week74.42%25.58%43
Daily78.57%21.43%14
Several times a day50.00%50.00%2
BeerNever or almost never52.08%47.92%960.00178 **22.97
Once a month or less50.00%50.00%96
Several times a month74.49%25.51%98
Several times a week48.00%52.00%25
Daily37.50%62.50%8
Wine and cocktailsNever or almost never74.58%25.42%590.007123 **33.36
Once a month or less53.28%46.72%137
Several times a month60.00%40.00%100
Several times a week34.78%65.22%23
Daily0.00%100.00%2
Several times a day50.00%50.00%2
Vodka and high-proof spiritsNever or almost never52.75%47.25%910.7439244.97
Once a month or less58.39%41.61%137
Several times a month62.20%37.80%82
Several times a week50.00%50.00%10
Daily66.67%33.33%3
* Pearson chi-squared test; ** Significant dependencies at the α = 0.05 level.
Table 5. Distribution of study participants in the different ranges of the healthy diet index pHDI-10.
Table 5. Distribution of study participants in the different ranges of the healthy diet index pHDI-10.
Pro-Healthy Diet Index (pHDI-10)Number Percentage
Low30995.67
Moderate144.33
High 00
Table 6. Distribution of the study participants in the different ranges of healthy diet index pHDI-10 with the division between Polish and Greek students.
Table 6. Distribution of the study participants in the different ranges of healthy diet index pHDI-10 with the division between Polish and Greek students.
Pro-Healthy Diet Index (pHDI-10)CountryTotal N dfp *chi2
PolandGreece
Low57.93%42.07%30910.5571142.31
Modetate 50.00%50.00%14
High 0.00%0.00%0
Total186137323
* Pearson chi-squared test.
Table 7. Distribution of study participants in the different ranges of the healthy diet index pHDI-10 in terms of nutritional status.
Table 7. Distribution of study participants in the different ranges of the healthy diet index pHDI-10 in terms of nutritional status.
Poland
BMIPro-Healthy Diet Index (pHDI-10) Total Ndfp *chi2
lowmoderatehigh
Normal BMI [%]96.62%3.38%0.00%14820.6565654.23
Overweight/obese [%]93.75%6.25%0.00%32
underweight [%]100.00%0.00%0.00%6
Total17970186
* Pearson chi-squared test
Greece
BMI Pro-Healthy Diet Index (pHDI-10) Total Ndfp *chi2
low moderatehigh
Normal BMI [%]94.74% 5.26%0.00%11420.8087165.33
Overweight/obese [%]93.75% 6.25%0.00%16
Underweight [%]100.00% 0.00%0.00%7
Total130 70137
* Pearson chi-squared test
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Widłak, P.; Malara, M.; Tomczyk, Ł.; Dania, A.; Panagiotakou, G.; Papoulia, G. Evaluation of the Dietary Habits of Polish and Greek University Students in the Context of the Health Benefits of Their Diets. Nutrients 2024, 16, 3819. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16223819

AMA Style

Widłak P, Malara M, Tomczyk Ł, Dania A, Panagiotakou G, Papoulia G. Evaluation of the Dietary Habits of Polish and Greek University Students in the Context of the Health Benefits of Their Diets. Nutrients. 2024; 16(22):3819. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16223819

Chicago/Turabian Style

Widłak, Patrycja, Marzena Malara, Łukasz Tomczyk, Aspasia Dania, Georgia Panagiotakou, and Georgia Papoulia. 2024. "Evaluation of the Dietary Habits of Polish and Greek University Students in the Context of the Health Benefits of Their Diets" Nutrients 16, no. 22: 3819. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16223819

APA Style

Widłak, P., Malara, M., Tomczyk, Ł., Dania, A., Panagiotakou, G., & Papoulia, G. (2024). Evaluation of the Dietary Habits of Polish and Greek University Students in the Context of the Health Benefits of Their Diets. Nutrients, 16(22), 3819. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16223819

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop