Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Next Article in Journal
Metabolic Reprogramming in Response to Freund’s Adjuvants: Insights from Serum Metabolomics
Previous Article in Journal
Soil Fungal Diversity and Community Structure of Russula griseocarnosa from Different Sites
Previous Article in Special Issue
Microbiological Ecological Surveillance of Zoonotic Pathogens from Hamadryas Baboons in Southwestern Saudi Arabia
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Antimicrobial-Resistance and Virulence-Associated Genes of Pasteurella multocida and Mannheimia haemolytica Isolated from Polish Dairy Calves with Symptoms of Bovine Respiratory Disease

by
Agnieszka Lachowicz-Wolak
1,
Aleksandra Chmielina
2,
Iwona Przychodniak
2,
Magdalena Karwańska
1,
Magdalena Siedlecka
1,
Małgorzata Klimowicz-Bodys
1,
Kamil Dyba
3 and
Krzysztof Rypuła
1,*
1
Division of Infectious Diseases of Animals and Veterinary Administration, Department of Epizootiology and Clinic of Birds and Exotic Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, pl. Grunwaldzki 45, 50-366 Wroclaw, Poland
2
“Epi-Vet” Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, pl. Grunwaldzki 45, 50-366 Wroclaw, Poland
3
Department of Applied Mathematics, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, pl. Grunwaldzki 45, 50-366 Wroclaw, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2025, 13(3), 491; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13030491 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 31 December 2024 / Revised: 17 February 2025 / Accepted: 20 February 2025 / Published: 22 February 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research on Infections and Veterinary Medicine)

Abstract

:
Bovine respiratory disease causes significant economic losses in cattle farming due to mortality, treatment costs, and reduced productivity. It involves viral and bacterial infections, with Pasteurella multocida and Mannheimia haemolytica key bacterial pathogens. These bacteria contribute to severe pneumonia and are often found together. Poland has one of the highest levels of antimicrobial use in food-producing animals among European Union countries. A total of 70 bacterial strains were analyzed, 48 P. multocida and 22 M. haemolytica, collected from affected calves’ respiratory tracts. The bacterial species were confirmed molecularly using PCR, which was also employed to detect antimicrobial resistance and virulence-associated genes. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined using the broth microdilution method. Antimicrobial resistance varied between the two bacterial species studied. The highest resistance in P. multocida was to chlortetracycline 79.2% (38/48) and oxytetracycline 81.3% (39/48), while M. haemolytica showed 63.6% (14/22) resistance to penicillin and tilmicosin. The highest susceptibility was found for fluoroquinolones: P. multocida demonstrated 91.7% (44/48) susceptibility to enrofloxacin and 87.5% (42/48) to danofloxacin, while 77.3% (17/22) of M. haemolytica were susceptible to both tested fluoroquinolones. The tetH and tetR genes were observed only in P. multocida, at frequencies of 20.8% (10/48) and 16.7% (8/48), respectively. Both species carried the mphE and msrE genes, though at lower frequencies. All M. haemolytica contained the lkt, gs60, and gcp genes. All P. multocida carried the sodA gene, while the hgbB and ompH genes were present in 37.5% (18/48) and 20.8% (10/48) of strains, respectively. The highest resistance was observed against the most commonly used antibiotics in the European Union, although the resistance differed between the studied bacterial species and each strain exhibited the presence of at least one virulence gene.

1. Introduction

Bovine respiratory disease (BRD) is a multifactorial disease involving viral and bacterial infections that can be predisposed by environmental factors or stress and can be further aggravated by them [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. This leads to significant economic losses in the cattle industry due to the high costs of treatment, reduced weight gain, and delayed time to first estrus and conception, resulting in later lactation and lower milk production in cows that have recovered from BRD [6,7,8].
Pasteurella multocida (P. multocida) and Mannheimia haemolytica (M. haemolytica) are two of the most frequently identified bacterial pathogens in calves suffering from BRD [10,16]. These bacteria are often found as coinfections and are generally considered opportunistic pathogens [10,17]. Nevertheless, they possess virulence factors that contribute to enhancing the bacteria’s ability to cause pathology and facilitate the development of infections. Mannheimia haemolytica, in particular, is linked to BRD outbreaks due to its production of virulence factors, such as leukotoxin, which contribute to clinical symptoms and cause severe pneumonia [18,19,20]. Mannheimia haemolytica harbors additional virulence-associated genes, including gcp, which encodes a glycoprotein involved in adhesion, and gs60, a heat-shock protein that enhances bacterial survival [20]. In contrast, P. multocida possesses sodA, which encodes an enzyme that neutralizes reactive oxygen species, aiding in evasion of the host immune response, hgbB, which may indicate the bacterium’s ability to utilize host hemoglobin, and ompH, which facilitates bacterial adhesion to host tissues, further contributing to infection development [15].
In sick calves, discharge from the nasal openings and conjunctivae is visible. It may appear serous, serous–mucous, or purulent. An elevated body temperature, especially in cases of acute disease, may also occur. Affected individuals show an increase in respiratory rate and lethargy and decreased appetite [4,5,11]. Due to the presence of dyspnea, calves adopt a posture with a lowered head and extended neck. In severe cases, they breathe through an open mouth. In the acute form of the disease, respiratory failure and death of the calf may occur within hours after the symptoms are first noticed [11].
BRD is among the most common reasons for antimicrobial use in dairy cattle [21,22,23]. According to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) [24], Poland has one of the highest levels of antimicrobial use in food-producing animals among European Union countries. Data for 2022 showed that the total sales of antibiotics for food-producing animals in Poland amounted to 838.3 tons, highlighting the significant scale of antimicrobial use in the country. The EU average was 73.9 mg per population correction unit (mg/PCU), while Poland reported 196.0 mg/PCU, which is notably higher. The most commonly sold antibiotics in the EU are penicillins, accounting for 32.7%, followed by tetracyclines at 23.5% [24]. The very frequent administration of these drugs and the irrational use of antimicrobials by veterinarians who do not conduct susceptibility testing contribute to increasing resistance, creating a vicious cycle. Recent research from Poland [22] revealed that over the course of three months on large dairy farms, individual calves received antimicrobial treatment up to two times. Rising antimicrobial resistance is a pressing issue impacting not only the health of calves but also the health of humans, particularly given that P. multocida has zoonotic potential [25,26,27,28,29].
To date, there has been a notable absence of published data regarding the antimicrobial susceptibility of P. multocida and M. haemolytica isolated from Polish calves suffering from BRD. This gap in the literature underscores the urgent need for detailed investigations to better understand the resistance profiles of these pathogens.
The primary aim of this study was to determine the antimicrobial susceptibility of P. multocida and M. haemolytica strains isolated from dairy calves with BRD. An additional objective was to assess the frequency of antimicrobial-resistance and virulence-associated genes and among these strains.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection

The study included samples collected between February 2021 and January 2024. The material consisted of either deep nasal swabs or lung and bronchi swabs from calves that exhibited symptoms of BRD, such as nasal and ocular discharge, fever, cough, increased respiratory rate, enhanced lung field murmur, and respiratory wheezing. Samples from the lower respiratory tract were collected postmortem from calves that had died while showing symptoms of BRD. Swabs were preserved in Amies transport medium with charcoal (Deltalab, S.L., Rubi, Spain) and transported within 48 h to the Epi-Vet veterinary diagnostic laboratory at Wroclaw University of Life Sciences. Samples were collected exclusively from the respiratory tract, with each animal providing a sample from a single location. Due to the commercial nature of the study, samples from several calves were pooled to obtain a single result for a given herd. The tested unit in this study was a bacterial strain isolated from the respiratory tract of a calf suffering from BRD.

2.2. Isolation and Initial Identification

Swabs were initially cultured on Columbia agar with 5% sheep blood (Graso, Stargard Szczeciński, Poland) and on MacConkey agar with crystal violet (Graso, Stargard Szczeciński, Poland). The media were incubated at 37 °C for 16–24 h in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2. On Columbia agar with 5% sheep blood, round, mucoid colonies with a characteristic “mouse-like” odor were observed, suggesting their affiliation with P. multocida, as well as small, gray colonies with β-hemolysis, suggesting their affiliation with M. haemolytica. These colonies were checked for cytochrome oxidase production using the Oxidase Test Stick (Liofilchem, Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy). Colonies that tested positive were streaked onto Columbia agar with 5% sheep blood and MacConkey agar with crystal violet and incubated as previously described. No growth of P. multocida was observed on MacConkey agar with crystal violet, whereas M. haemolytica grew as small, light-pink colonies. The isolates were biochemically tested according to the manufacturer’s instructions using the commercial RaPID NF system (Thermo Fisher Diagnostics B.V., Landsmeer, The Netherlands). The biochemical reactivity patterns were analyzed using dedicated ERIC™ v.1.1 software (Thermo Fisher Diagnostics B.V., Landsmeer, The Netherlands). Selected isolates of P. multocida and M. haemolytica were cryopreserved in CryoBank (Mast Group Ltd., Reinfeld, Germany) and stored at −80 °C for further studies. Species confirmation and serotyping was subsequently performed molecularly via PCR, as described below.

2.3. PCR

2.3.1. Genomic DNA Extraction

Genomic DNA was extracted using the Genomic Mini Kit (A&A Biotechnology, Gdynia, Poland) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The quality of the extracted genetic material was assessed using a DS-11 FX spectrophotometer (DeNovix Inc., Wilmington, NC, USA).

2.3.2. Amplification Setup

PCR amplification was performed using the Color Taq DNA polymerase kit (Eurx, Gdańsk, Poland). The reaction mixture contained the following components: 0.625 U of Color Taq DNA polymerase, 1 µL of template DNA, 0.1 µL of each forward and reverse primer,1 µL of dNTP mixture and 2.5 µL of 10× Buffer B (Eurx, Gdańsk, Poland). The mixture was supplemented with nuclease-free water (A&A Biotechnology, Gdynia, Poland) to a final volume of 25 µL.

2.3.3. Cycling Conditions

PCR was performed in a T100TM Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). The PCR protocol began with an initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 5 min. This was followed by 32 amplification cycles, each consisting of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at a temperature specific to the primers used for 30 s and extension at 72 °C for 1 min per kilobase (kb) of the amplified product. After the completion of the cycles, a final elongation step was performed at 72 °C for 10 min. The mixture was then cooled to 4 °C for further analysis.

2.3.4. Primers for Gene Detection

All primers used in this study were synthesized by Genomed S.A. (Warsaw, Poland). For all the genes detected, the primer pair sequences, annealing temperatures, and product sizes are listed in Table 1.

2.3.5. Electrophoresis of PCR Products

PCR-generated products were detected by electrophoresis in 1.5% agarose gels stained with Midori Green DNA Stain (Nippon Genetics Europe GmbH, Düren, Germany) alongside a DNA Marker 1, 100–1000 bp marker ladder (A&A Biotechnology, Gdynia, Poland) using a PowerPacTM Basic (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) at 95 V and 400 mA. The electrophoresis results were read using the GelDoc Go imaging system with Image Lab v.6.1 software (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, CA, USA).

2.3.6. Controls and Sequencing Validation

As positive controls, P. multocida ATCC 12945 was used for the kmt, capA, ompH, sodA, and hgbB genes, and M. haemolytica PCM 2685 from the Polish Academy of Science was used for the MropB, hyp, lkt, gs60 and gcp genes. To confirm the accuracy of the PCR results for all tested M. haemolytica genes, gene encoding lipopolysaccharide type 3 and resistance genes, the representative two products were selected and subsequently sent to Genomed S. A. (Warsaw, Poland) for Sanger sequencing with both forward and reverse PCR primers. The obtained sequences were analyzed using BioEdit v5.0.9 software and compared with sequences from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) GenBank database, confirming their alignment with those available in the database. Each PCR reaction included a negative control, in which ultrapure water (A&A Biotechnology, Gdynia, Poland) was used instead of the DNA template.

2.4. MIC

2.4.1. MIC Testing Methodology

The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for M. haemolytica and P. multocida were assessed using the broth microdilution method with the commercially available test plate Thermo Scientific SensititreTM BOPO6F (TREK Diagnostic Systems Ltd., East Grinstead, United Kingdom). The antimicrobials included ceftiofur (XNL), tiamulin (TIA), chlortetracycline (CTET), gentamicin (GEN), florfenicol (FFN), oxytetracycline (OXY), penicillin (PEN), ampicillin (AMP), danofloxacin (DANO), sulfadimethoxine (SDM), neomycin (NEO), trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (SXT), spectinomycin (SPE), tylosin tartrate (TYLT), tulathromycin (TUL), tilmicosin (TIL), clindamycin (CLI), and enrofloxacin (ENRO).
The testing procedures adhered to the guidelines established by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [38]. For optimal growth of the primary cryopreserved isolates, an inoculum of approximately 5 × 10⁵ cfu/mL was prepared in Thermo Scientific SensititreTM cation-adjusted Mueller–Hinton broth with 5% lysed horse blood (Remel Inc., Lenexa, KS, USA). The inoculated Sensititre plates were incubated in ambient air for 18–24 h at 36 ± 1 °C within a humidified chamber. Quality control is performed on the plates by the manufacturer; however, in addition, we conducted testing on a P. multocida ATCC 12945.

2.4.2. Evaluation of MIC Results

The MIC values were recorded using the SensititreTM Manual MIC Plate Reader (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA). The results were evaluated according to the CLSI standards to assess the assessment of the susceptibility of the tested bacterial strains to the antimicrobial agents [38]. Based on these evaluations, each strain was classified as susceptible (S), intermediate (I), or resistant (R) to the respective antimicrobial. In all instances where the term “insusceptible” is used, it refers collectively to both intermediate and resistant classifications. After determining the MIC values for each of the antimicrobials, population analyses were carried out to determine the MIC50 (MIC required to inhibit 50% of the organisms) and MIC90 (MIC required to inhibit 90% of the organisms) values. The multiple antimicrobial resistance (MAR) index was calculated as the quotient between the number of antimicrobials to which strains were resistant to the number of tested antimicrobials. Multidrug resistance (MDR) was defined as resistance to at least one substance in three or more antimicrobial classes.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

To assess the statistical significance of the difference in resistance to antimicrobials between the two studied bacterial species and to assess the correlation between the presence of virulence genes Pearson’s chi-squared tests without Yates’s correction were performed. Similarly, to check for correlations between antimicrobial resistance genes and the resistance results demonstrated in the MIC test, cross-tab analyses were performed along with Pearson’s chi-squared tests without Yates’s correction (χ2 test) and additionally, Pearson’s correlation. The significance level for all tests was set at α = 0.05. For binary data, the product of the number of observations (70 in this study) and the square of the sample Pearson correlation coefficient is equal to the chi-squared test statistic of independence computed without Yates’s correction. Therefore, to emphasize this relationship, the Yates correction was not applied [39].
Statistical analyses were performed using Statistica 13.3.721.1 (TIBCO Software Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA). Tables and graphs were prepared using Microsoft Office Excel 2007. Figures were prepared using Adobe Illustrator and VennPainter V.1.2.0 [40].

2.6. Ethics Statement

According to Polish law (Experiments on Animals Act from 15 January 2015, Journal of Laws of the Republic of Poland from 2015, item 266), this study did not require ethics committee approval. The samples used in this study were originally from cattle-infection diagnostic material collected by veterinarians treating these herds. Procedures did not cause the animals any pain, suffering, or distress greater than a needle-stick injury. However, the research outline was submitted to the Animal Welfare Advisory Team in Wroclaw, which qualified the study as research that did not require ethics committee approval.

3. Results

3.1. Bacterial Identification and Serotyping

Samples from 42 different herds were tested, all of which were collected from calves exhibiting symptoms of BRD. Three of the isolates were obtained from the lower respiratory tract postmortem, while the remaining isolates were from deep nasal swabs. Based on phenotypic, biochemical, and molecular analyses, a total of 70 bacterial isolates were included for further analysis: 48 P. multocida isolates and 22 M. haemolytica. Based on the presence of capsule genes, all P. multocida isolates were assigned to serogroup A, with 93.8% (45/48) of the isolates genotypically identified as the L3 lipopolysaccharide type, while the remaining three isolates could not be classified in terms of lipopolysaccharide type. Among the M. haemolytica isolates, 13.6% (3/22) were classified as serotype A1, while the remaining 86.4% (19/22) were classified as serotype A2. Among the three samples from the lower respiratory tract, two strains of P. multocida A:L3 and one strain of M. haemolytica serotype A2 were obtained.

3.2. Antimicrobial Susceptibility

The highest susceptibility was observed for fluoroquinolones: P. multocida showed 91.7% (44/48) susceptibility to enrofloxacin, while 77.3% (17/22) of M. haemolytica strains were susceptible to both enrofloxacin and danofloxacin. The highest percentage of intermediate susceptibility to antimicrobials was observed for M. haemolytica, with 50.0% (11/22) of the tested strains exhibiting intermediate susceptibility to FFN and SPE. The Pasteurella multocida strains demonstrated the highest resistance to tetracyclines, with 79.2% (38/48) resistant to CTET and 81.3% (39/48) resistant to OXY. In contrast, the M. haemolytica strains showed the highest resistance to PEN and TIL, with 63.6% (14/22) resistance. The remaining susceptibility percentages are presented in Table 2.
Statistically significant differences in resistance to some of the tested antimicrobial agents were observed between the P. multocida isolates and the M. haemolytica isolates: PEN χ2 = 13.778; TUL χ2 = 9.646; OXY χ2 = 9.205; CTE χ2 = 7.956; and TIL χ2 = 6.841, with p-values < 0.05. The mentioned antimicrobials are marked with an asterisk in the following graph depicting the percentage of insusceptible strains (Figure 1).

3.3. MIC Values

The effectiveness of individual antimicrobials was determined using the MIC50 and MIC90 (Figure 2). Due to the lack of bacterial growth inhibition in the presence of certain antimicrobials, it was not possible to identify the MIC50 for 22.2% (4/18) of the antimicrobials tested against P. multocida or 22.2% (4/18) of the antimicrobials tested against M. haemolytica. The MIC₉₀ could not be determined for 55.6% (10/18) of the antimicrobials for P. multocida and 61.1% (11/18) for M. haemolytica.

3.4. Multidrug-Resistance and Phenotypic Resistance Patterns

MDR was detected in 31.4% (22/70) of all the tested strains. Among the P. multocida strains, the rate was 27.1% (13/48), while among the M. haemolytica strains, it was 40.9% (9/22). The MAR index ranged from 0.275 for P. multocida to 0.336 for M. haemolytica.
The most frequently noted phenotypic resistance pattern was “CTET, OXY,” which was observed exclusively among P. multocida strains at 37.5% (18/48). Among the M. haemolytica strains, the most common resistance pattern was the cooccurrence of resistance to “XNL, CTET, OXY, PEN, TIL, TUL,” which was present in 18.2% (4/22) of the tested strains. All the recorded resistance patterns are presented in Table 3.

3.5. Frequency of Virulence-Associated Genes (VAGs)

Among the tested strains, 100% of the P. multocida strains possessed the sodA gene, while the other VAGs, namely, hgbB and ompH, were found in 37.5% (18/48) and 20.8% (10/48) of the strains, respectively. All three genes together were detected in 8.3% (4/48) of the strains. The M. haemolytica strains contained the lkt, gs60, and gcp genes in 100% (22/22) of the isolates.

3.6. Frequency of Resistance Genes

The genes tetH and tetR were observed exclusively among P. multocida strains, at 20.8% (10/48) and 16.7% (8/48), respectively. The genes mphE and msrE were detected in P. multocida at 6.3% (3/48) and 14.6% (7/48), respectively, and in M. haemolytica at 9.1% (2/22) each.

3.7. Associations

No statistically significant correlations were found between the pair hgbB and ompH. Moreover, the 100% presence of the remaining VAGs and the low frequency of antimicrobial-resistance genes rendered inferences based on the statistical correlation tests potentially unreliable. Regardless, these tests did not show any significant correlation at p < 0.05. However, the cooccurrence of the tetR or tetH genes was always consistent with phenotypic tetracycline resistance in MIC assays.
Therefore, we decided to present the results in the form of sets showing cooccurrences, as illustrated by the Venn diagrams (Figure 3 and Figure 4).

4. Discussion

Bovine respiratory disease (BRD) is the leading reason for antimicrobial use in calves [21,22,23]. The increasing resistance to antimicrobials represents a significant concern, not only for the health of calves but also for human health [24,25,26,27,28,29]. Recent molecular studies conducted by our team have revealed that P. multocida and M. haemolytica are the most frequently identified pathogens among Polish calves exhibiting symptoms of BRD [10].
According to an EMA report [24], the most commonly sold antimicrobials in the EU are penicillins (mainly extended-spectrum penicillins in Poland) and tetracyclines, which together account for 56.2% of the aggregated sales for food-producing animals by antimicrobial class in European countries in 2022. Compared with other countries in the European Union, Poland has a relatively high antimicrobial consumption. Of concern is the upward trend in antibiotic sales in Poland over the last decade, as presented in the EMA report [24]. Most of the other European countries included in this report exhibited a downward trend in antibiotic sales. In 2022, the overall antibiotic sales for use in the animal production sector in Poland were more than 2.5 times higher than the European average [24].
To the best of the authors’ knowledge, there is a lack of published studies on the antimicrobial susceptibility of P. multocida and M. haemolytica isolated from Polish calves with BRD. This gap in the literature highlights the urgent need for comprehensive studies to better understand the resistance profiles of these pathogens. All studies cited below refer exclusively to bacteria isolated from the cattle respiratory tract, as our research focuses solely on bacteria derived from this animal species.

4.1. Serotype Detection and Virulence-Associated Genes

The study we conducted on P. multocida was designed in accordance with the methodology outlined by Townsend et al. (1998) [30]. It was intended to detect the specific kmt1 gene and identify all capsular genotypes.
However, our results revealed the presence of only genotype A. Based on the available literature [41] and preliminary (unpublished) studies, we determined that lipopolysaccharide 3 is the most prevalent. This finding was confirmed in our study, as we detected it in 93.8% (45/48) of P. multocida isolates. Studies conducted on symptomatic Spanish cattle [42] also revealed that the majority of isolates belonged to serotype A:L3, accounting for 97.6% of all isolates (166/170). Similar results from other studies show that A:L3 was commonly detected in P. multocida isolates associated with BRD [15,18,43,44,45,46].
All P. multocida strains examined in our study exhibited the presence of the sodA gene, which helps bacteria evade the host immune response. In studies from Spain [42], Germany [33], and Japan [45], this gene was also detected at a rate of 100% in P. multocida serotype A strains. In a study from Iran [47], this gene was less frequently observed, but it was in other serotypes of P. multocida strains (B, E), occurring at a rate of 63.6%. A study from Egypt [29], where other serotypes in addition to A were also present, demonstrated a complete absence of this gene.
Ewers et al. (2006) [33] demonstrated a correlation between the presence of the hgbB gene and the manifestation of clinical symptoms in cattle. Moreover, this gene was found in 57.7% (104/180) of isolates from cattle. The hgbB gene, which may indicate the bacterium’s ability to utilize host hemoglobin, was found in 37.5% (18/48) of the strains investigated in our study. A high prevalence of this gene, at 74.0% (176/238), was reported by Katsuda et al. (2013) [45] among strains from diseased calves. Conversely, in the study by Calderón Bernal et al. (2022) [42], the prevalence was 0.6% (1/170).
The ompH gene encodes a protein that aids bacteria in adhering to host tissues, thereby facilitating colonization. In our study, it was the least frequently detected virulence gene in P. multocida, present in only 20.8% (10/48) of the strains. Similar results to ours were obtained by Calderón Bernal et al. (2022) [42], who reported a prevalence of 14.1% (24/170), whereas Ewers et al. (2006) [33] and Katsuda et al. (2013) [45] reported 100% presence of the gene. Interestingly, Gülaydin et al. (2020) [15] determined that if this gene is present alone (without any other VAGs cooccurring), it is not associated with the manifestation of the disease. In our study, however, it was consistently found in conjunction with other VAGs that we investigated. In our study, only sick calves were included, and the mentioned gene was detected. The relationship between the presence of this gene and the occurrence or absence of the disease requires further investigation.
We did not find a statistically significant correlation between the ompH and hgbB genes. Similarly, Ewers et al. (2006) [33] did not report such a correlation and also found no correlation between the other VAGs included in our study.
In our study, 86.4% (19/22) of the M. haemolytica isolates were genotypically classified as serotype A2, while the remaining 13.6% (3/22) were classified as serotype A1. No serotype A6 was detected, despite conducting the analysis according to the protocol outlined by Klima et al. (2017, 2014) [35,37], which included primers for all three genes determining serotypes.
Mannheimia haemolytica serotype A2 was considered nonpathogenic to cattle and was regarded as a commensal of the normal respiratory flora [35,48]. Current research provides updated insights into the role of this serotype. It is also recognized as an opportunistic pathogen capable of causing disease in calves. It was clearly associated with fatal acute lung disorder in calves in the Netherlands, with all of these M. haemolytica isolates (n = 49) belonging to serotype A2 [19]. Moreover, a study by het Lam et al. (2023) [19] reported that 96.1% (49/51) of the isolates from symptomatic calves were serotype A2, while all 45 isolates from cows were classified as serotypes A1 and A6.
In a study by Mason et al. (2022) [49], M. haemolytica serotype A2 was identified in 29.8% (31/104) of the M. haemolytica isolates tested, which were obtained from bovine clinical pathology and postmortem samples associated with pneumonia cases in Great Britain.
A study conducted in Denmark by Kudirkiene et al. (2021) [18] showed that serotype A1 was detected equally in healthy 52.4% (11/21) and diseased calves 47.6% (10/21), whereas serotype A2 was more frequently isolated from diseased calves 70.0% (7/10). In addition, similarly to our study, they did not detect serotype A6 [18].
Abed et al. (2020) [50], reported that 60% (9/15) of M. haemolytica isolates were classified as serotype A2, whereas 40% (6/15) were identified as serotype A1. All of these strains were obtained from pneumonic calves presenting with respiratory symptoms. Similarly, in the present study focusing on diseased calves, the majority of M. haemolytica isolates were identified as A2, including one sample obtained from lung tissue, whereas serotype A1 was considerably less common in our study.
Interestingly, the study by het Lam et al. (2023) [19] demonstrated that two serotype A2 strains were genetically closer to serotypes A1 and A6 than to other serotype A2 strains. Such results underscore the need for further research to elucidate the role of these serotypes in the pathogenesis of BRD in calves.
VAGs are essential for the pathogenicity of M. haemolytica, influencing its ability to cause disease and interact with the host’s immune system. One of the most important virulence factors is considered to be the bacterium’s ability to produce leukotoxin, which has cytotoxic potential and damages host leukocytes [20].
Abed et al. (2020) [50] demonstrated the presence of the lkt and gcp genes in 80% (4/5) of strains obtained from diseased calves. The gcp gene encodes a glycoprotein involved in bacterial adhesion to host tissues, facilitating colonization and infection [20]. In a separate study by Dokmak et al. (2015) [51], both the gcp and gs60 genes were detected in all strains from cattle exhibiting symptoms of BRD. The gs60 gene encodes a heat-shock protein that enables the bacterium to withstand hostile environmental conditions, enhancing its survival [20].
All the M. haemolytica strains examined in our study exhibited the presence of the VAGs investigated, suggesting that these strains have high pathogenic potential, despite a significant proportion belonging to serotype A2, which was previously considered nonpathogenic.

4.2. Antimicrobial Susceptibility

According to the EMA report [24], tetracyclines account for 23.5% of the total sales of antibiotics used in food-producing animals in the European Union. In Poland, they are used at a rate of 39.0 mg/PCU, whereas the average in the EU is 17.4 mg/PCU [24]. This group of antibiotics is classified under Category D in the EMA classification [52], indicating that they should constitute the first line of treatment. In our study, the highest resistance rates were among P. multocida strains, with resistance levels ranging from 79.2% to 81.3%. Similarly, among the M. haemolytica strains analyzed, half of them exhibited insusceptibility to tetracyclines. The elevated resistance to tetracyclines observed among the strains we studied may likely be contributed to by this high usage rate in Poland. The resistance of these bacterial species to tetracyclines has been reported in numerous studies worldwide. It is quite common for resistance rates to exceed 80%, reaching up to 100%, particularly among P. multocida strains [4,21,29,53,54,55,56]. Compared to those obtained in our study, lower resistance rates were reported by Dutta et al. (2021) [57] from Nebraska, USA (4.2–40.8%).
Mannheimia haemolytica strains presented the highest resistance to PEN and TIL, with rates of 63.6%, whereas P. multocida exhibited resistance rates of 18.8% and 25.5% for these antimicrobials, respectively.
Considering insusceptibility as a combination of resistant and intermediate strains, it is noteworthy that the highest level of insusceptibility recorded in our study was to PEN, with an observed rate of 86.4% among M. haemolytica strains. Furthermore, this antimicrobial showed the greatest difference in resistance levels between the studied bacterial species, and this difference was also statistically significant. Penicillins account for 32.7% of the total sales of antibiotics used in food-producing animals in the European Union, while macrolides account for 8.5%. In Poland, penicillins are used at a rate of 69.1 mg/PCU compared to the EU average of 24.2 mg/PCU. The usage of macrolides in Poland is 28.8 mg/PCU, while the European average is 6.3 mg/PCU. These are the highest rates among EU countries [24]. Penicillins, like tetracyclines, are classified under Category D in the EMA classification, while macrolides are classified under Category C, referred to as “caution” [52]. Notably, in studies of cattle from Denmark [18], where the usage of penicillins is 9.7 mg/PCU and macrolides is 5.0 mg/PCU [24], all the examined strains of P. multocida and M. haemolytica were found to be susceptible to PEN and TIL. This may suggest that high antibiotic usage contributes to the development of resistance among bacterial strains.
In the European Union, fluoroquinolones account for only 2.8% of the total sales of antimicrobials. Compared to other EU countries, fluoroquinolone usage in Poland is high, reaching 11.8 mg/PCU, while the European average is 2.1 mg/PCU [24]. However, in comparison to the other groups of antibacterial agents discussed in our study, fluoroquinolones are used significantly less frequently in Poland. This is most likely reflected in the high susceptibility levels of the bacterial strains we studied to this group of antimicrobials. In our study, the highest susceptibility was observed for fluoroquinolones: P. multocida presented a 91.7% (44/48) susceptibility rate to enrofloxacin, while 77.3% (17/22) of M. haemolytica strains were susceptible to both ENRO and DANO. Our results differ from those of studies conducted outside the European Union, which reported high percentages of resistant strains for both bacterial species with respect to the aforementioned fluoroquinolones [4,21,29,53,54,56,58]. However, our findings are consistent with those among Canadian cattle reported by Klima et al. (2020) [55], who also observed low levels of resistance to fluoroquinolones. It is beneficial that we observe low resistance rates to fluoroquinolones, as ENRO, DANO and SPE, which ranked next in terms of susceptibility, fall under Category B in the EMA classification [52]. This classification signifies that these agents are categorized as “restricted” and emphasizes the ongoing need for careful stewardship in their application. Therefore, low resistance to fluoroquinolones is a positive finding, as it helps preserve their effectiveness, which is especially important in the context of treating human infections.
We present and discuss antimicrobials for which breakpoints have been established by the CLSI in the context of susceptibility categories (S, I, R). On the other hand, for antimicrobials for which breakpoints are not defined by the the CLSI, we discuss the data in terms of MIC50 and MIC90 values.
For the bacteria we studied, which were sourced from the respiratory tracts of cattle, the breakpoint for resistance to AMP was established by the CLSI at 0.25 μg/mL [38]. The concentration range on the plates we used starts precisely at this level. Consequently, it was not possible to assess the susceptibility of the examined strains to this antimicrobial using CLSI guidelines. Nonetheless, for both bacterial species, the MIC50 was 0.25 μg/mL, with the MIC90 reaching 8 μg/mL (Figure 2). In a study from Japan by Katsuda et al. (2013) [45], a narrower disparity between these metrics was observed: the MIC50 for P. multocida was 1 μg/mL, while the MIC90 was 4 μg/mL. In contrast, for M. haemolytica, this disparity was more pronounced, with the MIC50 at 2 μg/mL and the MIC90 reaching as high as 128 μg/mL [59].
Moreover, for both bacterial species in our study, the MIC50 for NEO was the same as the lowest concentration tested, i.e., 4 μg/mL. Additionally, for M. haemolytica, this concentration also corresponds to the MIC90.
In contrast, the situation is different for TYLT and CLI. Most of the tested strains did not exhibit growth inhibition or did so only at the highest concentrations tested. However, this may be attributed to the intrinsic resistance of these bacterial species to these substances.
Elevated MIC values for TYLT and CLI were also reported by Depenbrock et al. (2021) [53] who studied bacteria obtained from California cattle; however, their study differs from ours in the concentrations of NEO, where the MIC50 and MIC90 values were notably higher than those observed in our study, exceeding 32 μg/mL. Similarly, high concentrations of 32 μg/mL and above for NEO and TYLT were reported by Andres-Lasheras et al. (2021) [4], who conducted studies on Canadian cattle.
Another significant issue is the simultaneous occurrence of resistance to various classes of antimicrobial agents. In our study, resistance to at least one substance in three or more antimicrobial classes was 27.1% (13/48) for P. multocida, while among M. haemolytica strains, resistance was notably higher at 40.9% (9/22). The resistance rate for P. multocida in our study was relatively low compared with that reported in other studies, whereas the resistance level for M. haemolytica fell within the moderate range.
Among dairy heifers in California [53], the MDR rates were 76% (110/145) for P. multocida and 70% (83/119) for M. haemolytica. In contrast, among Canadian dairy cattle [4], the MDR rates were 67.8% (164/242) for P. multocida and 25.4% (53/209) for M. haemolytica.
Klima et al. (2020) [55] reported varying levels of MDR, ranging from 50% to 90% for P. multocida and 55% to 81.8% for M. haemolytica across different years. Additionally, the majority of serotype A2 strains from calves with fatal acute lung disorders (95.6%) harbored multiple antimicrobial-resistance genes, which contributed to three to five antimicrobial classes, including phenicols, sulfonamides, tetracyclines, aminoglycosides, and beta-lactams [19].
MDR rates of antimicrobial agents in our study are lower than those reported in other parts of the world. This may suggest that in Poland, only a few groups of antibiotics are primarily used, but they are administered very frequently.
Klima et al. (2020) [55] identified 104 unique multidrug-resistance patterns involving 16 different antimicrobials. In our study, we observed 25 configurations, although the number of antimicrobials considered was 11. Similarly, Depenbrock et al. (2021) [53] reported the same number of configurations as our study, while examining the same number of antimicrobials.
In our study, the most frequently observed phenotypic resistance pattern was “CTET, OXY.” However, this pattern was exclusively observed among P. multocida strains, occurring in 37.5% (18/48) of the strains. Furthermore, these antimicrobials agents belong to the same class.
In contrast, among the M. haemolytica strains, resistance to “XNL, CTET, OXY, PEN, TIL, TUL” was the most frequently observed configuration and was present in 18.2% (4/22) of the tested strains. Although this configuration involves six antimicrobials, they belong to four distinct classes. Depenbrock et al. (2021) [53] found that P. multocida was most commonly resistant to four classes, while M. haemolytica was resistant to three classes, which contrasts with our findings.
Furthermore, their study revealed that resistance to fluoroquinolones was present in the most common configurations for both P. multocida and M. haemolytica, which also distinguishes their findings from ours [53]. In contrast, in our study, configurations containing ENRO and/or DANO were observed in only 8.6% (6/70) of the results.
They also noted a similarity in the resistance patterns, suggesting that this might be due to both bacterial species being isolated from the nasal cavity [53]. In our study, however, these patterns appeared to differ, and we have demonstrated statistically significant differences in antimicrobial resistance between these two bacterial species. Therefore, it seems that the previous use of antimicrobials in the studied populations is more likely to have influenced the emergence of resistance patterns than the fact that they were isolated from a single location.

4.3. Resistance Genes

In our study, the presence of the tetH and tetR genes was consistently associated with phenotypic to tetracycline resistance, but the genes mphE and msrE were detected not only in strains exhibiting phenotypic resistance to macrolides but also in those that did not show such resistance (Figure 4). Similar findings were reported by Klima et al. (2020) [55]; however, in their study, the presence of the tetH gene was not associated with phenotypic resistance to chlortetracycline in more than 70% of P. multocida and M. haemolytica strains. It implies that the presence of resistance genes does not always correlate with phenotypic resistance, as gene expression can be influenced by various regulatory mechanisms. The tetR gene was always found in cooccurrence with the tetH gene in the examined strains (n = 8). Each of these strains exhibited phenotypic resistance to both tested tetracyclines (CTET and OXY). Among all the strains in which the tetH gene was detected, phenotypic resistance to OXY was observed in 10 out of 10 cases, while one of these strains did not show resistance to CTET (1/10). Cooccurring resistance to both CTET and OXY in the presence of the tetH gene was noted in 9 out of 10 strains. These findings are consistent with those of the study by Klima et al. (2020) [55], which demonstrated a statistically significant association between the presence of tetH and resistance to OXY.
In our study, resistance genes for antimicrobials such as tetR, tetH, mphE, and msrE were relatively rare. Therefore, we were not able to make inferences based on correlation tests. However, phenotypic resistance to tetracyclines and macrolides was observed at a high level (Figure 1). The observed antimicrobial resistance may result from the presence of various genes as well as other factors, such as biofilm production or mutations [60,61]. More than 40 genes responsible for tetracycline resistance are known. For example, among cattle, the tetG gene was found in Germany [61,62], tetL in Belgium [63], and tetB in France, [60], while tetH emerged as the most frequently detected gene in North America [55,64].
Understanding the mechanisms underlying resistance in the strains studied would require more extensive research.

4.4. Limitations

This study used only clinical samples submitted to a single Polish laboratory, which primarily receives specimens from the southwestern region of the country. Due to financial constraints, we were unable to perform LPS typing for three P. multocida strains that were negative on the confirmation test for LPS type three. Additionally, the small number of M. haemolytica serotype A1 strains (3/22) precluded the possibility of conducting reliable comparative analyses between serotypes.

4.5. Future Directions

In this study, the MIC90 values for more than half of the tested antimicrobials fell outside the range of the concentrations examined. Furthermore, the statistically significant differences observed in the susceptibility of the bacterial species to antimicrobial agents complicate the formulation of recommendations for field veterinarians regarding the most appropriate first-line antimicrobials to use for BRD in calves. Despite the high susceptibility of the bacteria to fluoroquinolones, it is important to note that these drugs are highly classified by the EMA and should not be used indiscriminately. Therefore, we believe that microbiological testing, including determining the susceptibility of isolated bacterial strains, should precede any decision to use antimicrobial agents in calves in Poland.
The levels of average antimicrobial resistance among M. haemolytica strains are relatively high, raising some concerns. It is intriguing to consider whether over the next few years, these values may evolve into full resistance and what factors might contribute to this trend. Such dynamics in resistance could significantly impact treatment efficacy and necessitate the development of new therapeutic strategies. It will be important to monitor these trends in the future to better understand the mechanisms of resistance evolution and to implement appropriate preventive measures.
The potential role of M. haemolytica serotype A2 as a pathogen, which was previously considered exclusively nonpathogenic in cattle, makes it an intriguing subject for further research. Investigating its role in respiratory diseases could provide valuable insights to aid in the development of prevention strategies.

5. Conclusions

The results of this study expand the knowledge on the pathogenicity and antimicrobial resistance of P. multocida and M. haemolytica in Polish cattle. All the tested strains of both bacterial species possessed at least one virulence-associated gene, while all M. haemolytica strains carried each of the investigated virulence genes, clearly indicating their potential to cause disease. Pasteurella multocida exhibited the highest resistance to tetracyclines, while M. haemolytica demonstrated the greatest lack of sensitivity to penicillin. The simultaneous high usage of these antibiotics in the EU, especially in Poland, indicates a potential impact of their widespread use on the development of resistance. A significant difference in antimicrobial resistance between the bacterial species studied complicates effective BRD therapy based solely on empirically chosen antibacterial drugs. Given the above, it is crucial for clinicians to perform microbiological tests with antimicrobial-susceptibility assessments as frequently as possible before applying them to sick calves.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.L.-W. and K.R.; data curation, A.L.-W.; formal analysis, A.L.-W. and K.D.; investigation, A.L-W., A.C., I.P., M.K., and M.S.; methodology, A.L.-W., A.C., I.P., M.K., M.S., M.K.-B., K.D., and K.R.; resources, A.L.-W. and K.R.; supervision, M.K.-B. and K.R.; visualization, A.L.-W.; writing—original draft, A.L.-W.; validation, M.K.-B. and K.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The APC is financed by Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are openly available in bioRxiv platform https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.25.614927.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Iryna Furda for her assistance with the initial steps of the DNA extraction process and Zuzanna Czekaj for her support during the early stages of PCR-based species identification.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Buczinski, S.; Achard, D.; Timsit, E. Effects of calfhood respiratory disease on health and performance of dairy cattle: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Dairy Sci. 2021, 104, 8214–8227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Donlon, J.D.; McAloon, C.G.; Hyde, R.; Aly, S.; Pardon, B.; Mee, J.F. A systematic review of the relationship between housing environmental factors and bovine respiratory disease in preweaned calves—Part 1: Ammonia, air microbial count, particulate matter and endotoxins. Vet. J. 2023, 300–302, 106031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Donlon, J.D.; McAloon, C.G.; Hyde, R.; Aly, S.; Pardon, B.; Mee, J.F. A systematic review of the relationship between housing environmental factors and bovine respiratory disease in preweaned calves—Part 2: Temperature, relative humidity and bedding. Vet. J. 2023, 300–302, 106032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Andrés-Lasheras, S.; Ha, R.; Zaheer, R.; Lee, C.; Booker, C.W.; Dorin, C.; van Donkersgoed, J.; Deardon, R.; Gow, S.; Hannon, S.J.; et al. Prevalence and Risk Factors Associated With Antimicrobial Resistance in Bacteria Related to Bovine Respiratory Disease—A Broad Cross-Sectional Study of Beef Cattle at Entry Into Canadian Feedlots. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 692646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pratelli, A.; Cirone, F.; Capozza, P.; Trotta, A.; Corrente, M.; Balestrieri, A.; Buonavoglia, C. Bovine respiratory disease in beef calves supported long transport stress: An epidemiological study and strategies for control and prevention. Res. Vet. Sci. 2021, 135, 450–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Blakebrough-Hall, C.; McMeniman, J.P.; González, L.A. An evaluation of the economic effects of bovine respiratory disease on animal performance, carcass traits, and economic outcomes in feedlot cattle defined using four BRD diagnosis methods. J. Anim. Sci. 2020, 98, skaa005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, M.; Schneider, L.G.; Hubbard, K.J.; Smith, D.R. Cost of bovine respiratory disease in preweaned calves on US beef cow-calf operations (2011–2015). J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2018, 253, 624–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. van der Fels-Klerx, H.J.; Saatkamp, H.W.; Verhoeff, J.; Dijkhuizen, A.A. Effects of bovine respiratory disease on the productivity of dairy heifers quantified by experts. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2002, 75, 157–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lachowicz-Wolak, A.; Klimowicz-Bodys, M.D.; Płoneczka-Janeczko, K.; Bednarski, M.; Dyba, K.; Knap, P.; Rypuła, K. Simultaneous Presence of Antibodies against Five Respiratory Pathogens in Unvaccinated Dairy Calves from South-Western Poland. Animals 2024, 14, 2520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Lachowicz-Wolak, A.; Klimowicz-Bodys, M.D.; Płoneczka-Janeczko, K.; Bykowy, M.; Siedlecka, M.; Cinciała, J.; Rypuła, K. The Prevalence, Coexistence, and Correlations between Seven Pathogens Detected by a PCR Method from South-Western Poland Dairy Cattle Suffering from Bovine Respiratory Disease. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Peek, S.F.; Ollivett, T.L.; Divers, T.J. Respiratory Diseases. In Rebhun’s Diseases of Dairy Cattle; Peek, S.F., Divers, T.J., Eds.; Saunders: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2018; pp. 94–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Werid, G.M.; Van, T.D.; Miller, D.; Hemmatzadeh, F.; Fulton, R.W.; Kirkwood, R.; Petrovski, K. Bovine Parainfluenza-3 Virus Detection Methods and Prevalence in Cattle: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Animals 2024, 14, 494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Gaudino, M.; Nagamine, B.; Ducatez, M.F.; Meyer, G. Understanding the mechanisms of viral and bacterial coinfections in bovine respiratory disease: A comprehensive literature review of experimental evidence. Vet. Res. 2022, 53, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Mitra, N.; Cernicchiaro, N.; Torres, S.; Li, F.; Hause, B.M. Metagenomic characterization of the virome associated with bovine respiratory disease in feedlot cattle identified novel viruses and suggests an etiologic role for influenza D virus. J. Gen. Virol. 2016, 97, 1771–1784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Gülaydin, Ö.; Gürtürk, K. Investigation of biotype, genotype and virulence associated genes in Pasteurella multocida capsular type A strains from the respiratory tract of cattle andtheir relationship with disease cases. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2020, 44, 503–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Denholm, K.; Evans, N.P.; Baxter-Smith, K.; Burr, P. Retrospective study of the relative frequency of cattle respiratory disease pathogens in clinical laboratory samples submitted by UK veterinary practices. Vet. Rec. 2024, 195, e4434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Freeman, C.N.; Herman, E.K.; Abi Younes, J.; Ramsay, D.E.; Erikson, N.; Stothard, P.; Links, M.G.; Otto, S.J.G.; Waldner, C. Evaluating the potential of third generation metagenomic sequencing for the detection of BRD pathogens and genetic determinants of antimicrobial resistance in chronically ill feedlot cattle. BMC Vet. Res. 2022, 18, 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kudirkiene, E.; Aagaard, A.K.; Schmidt, L.M.B.; Pansri, P.; Krogh, K.M.; Olsen, J.E. Occurrence of major and minor pathogens in calves diagnosed with bovine respiratory disease. Vet. Microbiol. 2021, 259, 109135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. het Lam, J.; Derkman, T.H.J.; van Garderen, E.; Dijkman, R.; van Engelen, E. Distinct Mannheimia haemolytica serotypes isolated from fatal infections in veal calves and dairy cows. Vet. J. 2023, 292, 105940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lo, R.Y. Genetic analysis of virulence factors of Mannheimia (Pasteurella) haemolytica A1. Vet. Microbiol. 2001, 83, 23–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Morgan Bustamante, B.L.; Chigerwe, M.; Martínez-López, B.; Aly, S.S.; McArthur, G.; ElAshmawy, W.R.; Fritz, H.; Williams, D.R.; Wenz, J.; Depenbrock, S. Antimicrobial Susceptibility in Respiratory Pathogens and Farm and Animal Variables in Weaned California Dairy Heifers: Logistic Regression and Bayesian Network Analyses. Antibiotics 2024, 13, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kupczyński, R.; Bednarski, M.; Sokołowski, M.; Kowalkowski, W.; Pacyga, K. Comparison of Antibiotic Use and the Frequency of Diseases Depending on the Size of Herd and the Type of Cattle Breeding. Animals 2024, 14, 1889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Dargatz, D.A.; Lombard, J.E. Summary of BRD data from the 2011 NAHMS feedlot and dairy heifer studies. Anim. Health Res. Rev. 2014, 15, 123–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. European Medicines Agenc. Sales of veterinary antimicrobial agents in 31 European countries in 2022: Trends from 2010 to 2022, Thirteenth ESVAC report. Publ. Off. Eur. Union 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Neculai-Valeanu, A.-S.; Ariton, A.-M.; Radu, C.; Porosnicu, I.; Sanduleanu, C.; Amariții, G. From Herd Health to Public Health: Digital Tools for Combating Antibiotic Resistance in Dairy Farms. Antibiotics 2024, 13, 634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Silbergeld, E.K.; Graham, J.; Price, L.B. Industrial food animal production, antimicrobial resistance, and human health. Annu. Rev. Public Health 2008, 29, 151–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Prestinaci, F.; Pezzotti, P.; Pantosti, A. Antimicrobial resistance: A global multifaceted phenomenon. Pathog. Glob. Health 2015, 109, 309–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Piorunek, M.; Brajer-Luftmann, B.; Walkowiak, J. Pasteurella multocida Infection in Humans. Pathogens 2023, 12, 1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Elsayed, M.S.A.E.; Eldsouky, S.M.; Roshdy, T.; Said, L.; Thabet, N.; Allam, T.; Mohammed, A.B.A.; Nasr, G.M.; Basiouny, M.S.M.; Akl, B.A.; et al. Virulence Determinants and Antimicrobial Profiles of Pasteurella multocida Isolated from Cattle and Humans in Egypt. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Townsend, K.M.; Frost, A.J.; Lee, C.W.; Papadimitriou, J.M.; Dawkins, H.J. Development of PCR assays for species- and type-specific identification of Pasteurella multocida isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1998, 36, 1096–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Townsend, K.M.; Boyce, J.D.; Chung, J.Y.; Frost, A.J.; Adler, B. Genetic organization of Pasteurella multocida cap Loci and development of a multiplex capsular PCR typing system. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2001, 39, 924–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Harper, M.; John, M.; Turni, C.; Edmunds, M.; St Michael, F.; Adler, B.; Blackall, P.J.; Cox, A.D.; Boyce, J.D. Development of a rapid multiplex PCR assay to genotype Pasteurella multocida strains by use of the lipopolysaccharide outer core biosynthesis locus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2015, 53, 477–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ewers, C.; Lübke-Becker, A.; Bethe, A.; Kiebling, S.; Filter, M.; Wieler, L.H. Virulence genotype of Pasteurella multocida strains isolated from different hosts with various disease status. Vet. Microbiol. 2006, 114, 304–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kayal, A.; Nahar, N.; Barker, L.; Tran, T.; Williams, M.; Blackall, P.J.; Turni, C.; Omaleki, L. Molecular identification and characterisation of Mannheimia haemolytica. Vet. Microbiol. 2024, 288, 109930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Klima, C.L.; Zaheer, R.; Briggs, R.E.; McAllister, T.A. A multiplex PCR assay for molecular capsular serotyping of Mannheimia haemolytica serotypes 1, 2, and 6. J. Microbiol. Methods 2017, 139, 155–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Klima, C.L.; Alexander, T.W.; Hendrick, S.; McAllister, T.A. Characterization of Mannheimia haemolytica isolated from feedlot cattle that were healthy or treated for bovine respiratory disease. Can. J. Vet. Res. 2014, 78, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  37. Klima, C.L.; Zaheer, R.; Cook, S.R.; Booker, C.W.; Hendrick, S.; Alexander, T.W.; McAllister, T.A. Pathogens of bovine respiratory disease in North American feedlots conferring multidrug resistance via integrative conjugative elements. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2014, 52, 438–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. CLSI VET01S™: Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated From Animals, 7th ed.; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2024; ISBN 978-1-68440-211-3. [Google Scholar]
  39. Camilli, G.; Hopkins, K.D. Applicability of chi-square to 2 × 2 contingency tables with small expected cell frequencies. Psychol. Bull. 1978, 85, 163–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lin, G.; Chai, J.; Yuan, S.; Mai, C.; Cai, L.; Murphy, R.W.; Zhou, W.; Luo, J. VennPainter: A Tool for the Comparison and Identification of Candidate Genes Based on Venn Diagrams. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0154315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Kędrak-Jabłońska, A.; Borkowska-Opacka, B. Electrophoretic profiles of the outer membrane proteins of Pasteurella multocida serotype A3 in the etiopathogenesis of respiratory syndrome in beef cattle. Bull. Vet. Inst. Pulawy 2006, 50, 451–454. [Google Scholar]
  42. Calderón Bernal, J.M.; Fernández, A.; Arnal, J.L.; Sanz Tejero, C.; Fernández-Garayzábal, J.F.; Vela, A.I.; Cid, D. Molecular Epidemiology of Pasteurella multocida Associated with Bovine Respiratory Disease Outbreaks. Animals 2022, 13, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Peng, Z.; Liang, W.; Wang, F.; Xu, Z.; Xie, Z.; Lian, Z.; Hua, L.; Zhou, R.; Chen, H.; Wu, B. Genetic and Phylogenetic Characteristics of Pasteurella multocida Isolates From Different Host Species. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Jamali, H.; Rezagholipour, M.; Fallah, S.; Dadrasnia, A.; Chelliah, S.; Velappan, R.D.; Wei, K.S.C.; Ismail, S. Prevalence, characterization and antibiotic resistance of Pasteurella multocida isolated from bovine respiratory infection. Vet. J. 2014, 202, 381–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Katsuda, K.; Hoshinoo, K.; Ueno, Y.; Kohmoto, M.; Mikami, O. Virulence genes and antimicrobial susceptibility in Pasteurella multocida isolates from calves. Vet. Microbiol. 2013, 167, 737–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Turni, C.; Dayao, D.; Aduriz, G.; Cortabarria, N.; Tejero, C.; Ibabe, J.C.; Singh, R.; Blackall, P. A Pasteurella multocida strain affecting nulliparous heifers and calves in different ways. Vet. Microbiol. 2016, 195, 17–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Gharibi, D.; Hajikolaei, M.R.H.; Ghorbanpour, M.; Barzegar, S.K. Virulence gene profiles of Pasteurella multocida strains isolated from cattle and buffalo. Vet. Arh. 2017, 87, 677–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Klima, C.L.; Alexander, T.W.; Read, R.R.; Gow, S.P.; Booker, C.W.; Hannon, S.; Sheedy, C.; McAllister, T.A.; Selinger, L.B. Genetic characterization and antimicrobial susceptibility of Mannheimia haemolytica isolated from the nasopharynx of feedlot cattle. Vet. Microbiol. 2011, 149, 390–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mason, C.; Errington, J.; Foster, G.; Thacker, J.; Grace, O.; Baxter-Smith, K. Mannheimia haemolytica serovars associated with respiratory disease in cattle in Great Britain. BMC Vet. Res. 2022, 18, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Abed, A.H.; El-Seedy, F.R.; Hassan, H.M.; Nabih, A.M.; Khalifa, E.; Salem, S.E.; Wareth, G.; Menshawy, A.M.S. Serotyping, Genotyping and Virulence Genes Characterization of Pasteurella multocida and Mannheimia haemolytica Isolates Recovered from Pneumonic Cattle Calves in North Upper Egypt. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Dokmak, M.; Ebied, S. Genetic Diversity of Mannheimia haemolytica strains. AJVS 2015, 47, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. European Medicines Agency. Categorisation of Antibiotics Used in Animals Promotes Responsible Use to Protect Public and Animal Health. Available online: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/categorisation-antibiotics-used-animals-promotes-responsible-use-protect-public-and-animal-health (accessed on 23 September 2024).
  53. Depenbrock, S.; Aly, S.; Wenz, J.; Williams, D.; ElAshmawy, W.; Clothier, K.; Fritz, H.; McArthur, G.; Heller, M.; Chigerwe, M. In-vitro antibiotic resistance phenotypes of respiratory and enteric bacterial isolates from weaned dairy heifers in California. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0260292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Schönecker, L.; Schnyder, P.; Schüpbach-Regula, G.; Meylan, M.; Overesch, G. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of opportunistic pathogens associated with bovine respiratory disease isolated from nasopharyngeal swabs of veal calves in Switzerland. Prev. Vet. Med. 2020, 185, 105182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Klima, C.L.; Holman, D.B.; Cook, S.R.; Conrad, C.C.; Ralston, B.J.; Allan, N.; Anholt, R.M.; Niu, Y.D.; Stanford, K.; Hannon, S.J.; et al. Multidrug Resistance in Pasteurellaceae Associated With Bovine Respiratory Disease Mortalities in North America from 2011 to 2016. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 606438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Bahr, A.D.; Salib, F.A.; Soliman, Y.A.; Amin, M.M. Multi-Drug Resistant Pasteurella multocida and Mannheimia haemolytica Strains Isolated from Different Hosts Affected by Pneumonic Pasteurellosis in Egypt. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2020, 9, 356–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Dutta, E.; Loy, J.D.; Deal, C.A.; Wynn, E.L.; Clawson, M.L.; Clarke, J.; Wang, B. Development of a Multiplex Real-Time PCR Assay for Predicting Macrolide and Tetracycline Resistance Associated with Bacterial Pathogens of Bovine Respiratory Disease. Pathogens 2021, 10, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Snyder, E.; Credille, B.; Berghaus, R.; Giguère, S. Prevalence of multi drug antimicrobial resistance in isolated from high-risk stocker cattle at arrival and two weeks after processing. J. Anim. Sci. 2017, 95, 1124–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Katsuda, K.; Kohmoto, M.; Mikami, O. Relationship between serotype and the antimicrobial susceptibility of Mannheimia haemolytica isolates collected between 1991 and 2010. Res. Vet. Sci. 2013, 94, 205–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Chaslus-Dancla, E.; Lesage-Descauses, M.C.; Leroy-Sétrin, S.; Martel, J.L.; Lafont, J.P. Tetracycline resistance determinants, Tet B and Tet M, detected in Pasteurella haemolytica and Pasteurella multocida from bovine herds. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 1995, 36, 815–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Michael, G.B.; Bossé, J.T.; Schwarz, S. Antimicrobial Resistance in Pasteurellaceae of Veterinary Origin. In Antimicrobial Resistance in Bacteria from Livestock and Companion Animals; Schwarz, S., Cavaco, L.M., Shen, J., Aarestrup, F.M., Eds.; ASM Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2018; pp. 331–363. ISBN 9781683670520. [Google Scholar]
  62. Kehrenberg, C.; Salmon, S.A.; Watts, J.L.; Schwarz, S. Tetracycline resistance genes in isolates of Pasteurella multocida, Mannheimia haemolytica, Mannheimia glucosida and Mannheimia varigena from bovine and swine respiratory disease: Intergeneric spread of the tet(H) plasmid pMHT1. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2001, 48, 631–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Kehrenberg, C.; Catry, B.; Haesebrouck, F.; de Kruif, A.; Schwarz, S. tet(L)-mediated tetracycline resistance in bovine Mannheimia and Pasteurella isolates. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2005, 56, 403–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Hansen, L.M.; Blanchard, P.C.; Hirsh, D.C. Distribution of tet(H) among Pasteurella isolates from the United States and Canada. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1996, 40, 1558–1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Percentages of insusceptibility to antimicrobials among the tested strains of Pasteurella multocida (P. multocida) and Mannheimia haemolytica (M. haemolytica). * Statistically significant difference in resistance to the given antimicrobial agent between bacterial species (p < 0.05). CTET—chlortetracycline, OXY—oxytetracycline, TUL—tulathromycin, TIL—tilmicosin, PEN—penicillin, ENRO—enrofloxacin, DANO—danofloxacin, XNL—ceftiofur, FFN—florfenicol, SPE—spectinomycin.
Figure 1. Percentages of insusceptibility to antimicrobials among the tested strains of Pasteurella multocida (P. multocida) and Mannheimia haemolytica (M. haemolytica). * Statistically significant difference in resistance to the given antimicrobial agent between bacterial species (p < 0.05). CTET—chlortetracycline, OXY—oxytetracycline, TUL—tulathromycin, TIL—tilmicosin, PEN—penicillin, ENRO—enrofloxacin, DANO—danofloxacin, XNL—ceftiofur, FFN—florfenicol, SPE—spectinomycin.
Microorganisms 13 00491 g001
Figure 2. Number of bacterial strains of P. multocida (Pm) and M. haemolytica (Mh) showing growth inhibition at the specified concentrations of the tested antimicrobial agents. The range of tested concentrations is indicated by the frames. The colored fields indicate the concentrations at which bacterial growth was inhibited. Darker shades represent a higher number of inhibited isolates at a given concentration. Green corresponds to P. multocida, while red represents M. haemolytica. The number of strains not inhibited at the tested concentrations was also included. MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀ values marked with “>” indicate that bacterial growth inhibition was not achieved at the tested concentrations. CTET—chlortetracycline, OXY—oxytetracycline, TUL—tulathromycin, TIL—tilmicosin, PEN—penicillin, AMP—ampicillin, ENRO—enrofloxacin, DANO—danofloxacin, XNL—ceftiofur, FFN—florfenicol, SPE—spectinomycin, CLI—clindamycin, GEN—gentamicin, NEO—neomycin, SDM—sulfadimethoxine, TIA—tiamulin, SXT—trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole, TYLT—tylosin tartrate.
Figure 2. Number of bacterial strains of P. multocida (Pm) and M. haemolytica (Mh) showing growth inhibition at the specified concentrations of the tested antimicrobial agents. The range of tested concentrations is indicated by the frames. The colored fields indicate the concentrations at which bacterial growth was inhibited. Darker shades represent a higher number of inhibited isolates at a given concentration. Green corresponds to P. multocida, while red represents M. haemolytica. The number of strains not inhibited at the tested concentrations was also included. MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀ values marked with “>” indicate that bacterial growth inhibition was not achieved at the tested concentrations. CTET—chlortetracycline, OXY—oxytetracycline, TUL—tulathromycin, TIL—tilmicosin, PEN—penicillin, AMP—ampicillin, ENRO—enrofloxacin, DANO—danofloxacin, XNL—ceftiofur, FFN—florfenicol, SPE—spectinomycin, CLI—clindamycin, GEN—gentamicin, NEO—neomycin, SDM—sulfadimethoxine, TIA—tiamulin, SXT—trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole, TYLT—tylosin tartrate.
Microorganisms 13 00491 g002
Figure 3. Venn diagrams showing the cooccurrence of virulence-associated genes in the studied strains of P. multocida and M. haemolytica. The common parts indicate the types of configurations, while the numbers in the respective fields represent the frequency of each configuration.
Figure 3. Venn diagrams showing the cooccurrence of virulence-associated genes in the studied strains of P. multocida and M. haemolytica. The common parts indicate the types of configurations, while the numbers in the respective fields represent the frequency of each configuration.
Microorganisms 13 00491 g003
Figure 4. Venn diagrams showing the cooccurrence of antimicrobial resistance genes and phenotypic resistance in the studied strains of P. multocida and M. haemolytica. The common parts indicate the types of configurations, while the numbers in the respective fields represent the frequency of each configuration. CTET—chlortetracycline, OXY—oxytetracycline, TUL—tulathromycin, TIL—tilmicosin.
Figure 4. Venn diagrams showing the cooccurrence of antimicrobial resistance genes and phenotypic resistance in the studied strains of P. multocida and M. haemolytica. The common parts indicate the types of configurations, while the numbers in the respective fields represent the frequency of each configuration. CTET—chlortetracycline, OXY—oxytetracycline, TUL—tulathromycin, TIL—tilmicosin.
Microorganisms 13 00491 g004
Table 1. Primer sequence, amplicon size, annealing temperature, and gene accession numbers for all the genes detected in this study.
Table 1. Primer sequence, amplicon size, annealing temperature, and gene accession numbers for all the genes detected in this study.
PCR Details for Detected Genes
PCR Target/GenePrimer NamePCR Primer Sequence 5′→3′Amplicon Size (bp)Annealing Temperature
(°C)
Primer Reference
Pasteurella multocida
Bacteria species confirmation, KMT1KMT1T7ATCCGCTATTTACCCAGTGG46055[30]
KMT1SP6GCTGTAAACGAACTCGCCAC
Capsular type ACAPATGCCAAAATCGCAGTCAG104455[31]
TTGCCATCATTGTCAGTG
LPS genotype 3BAP7214CAAAGATTGGTTCCAAATCTGAATGGA47452[32]
BAP7213TGCAGGCGAGAGTTGATAAACCATC
Virulence
B hemoglobin-binding hgbBACCGCGTTGGAATTATGATTG78854[33]
protein CATTGAGTACGGCTTGACAT
Superoxide sodATACCAGAATTAGGCTACGC36155[33]
dismutase A GAAACGGGTTGCTGCCGCT
Outer-membraneompHCGCGTATGAAGGTTTAGGT43857[33]
protein H TTTAGATTGTGCGTAGTCAAC
Mannheimia haemolytica
Bacteria species confirmationMropBAACACATAAACGCCGTATCTCG13655[34]
GATATTCGGGCCTTCAGGA
Serotype A1hypCATTTCCTTAGGTTCAGC30655[35]
CAAGTCATCGTAATGCCT
Serotype A2Core2GGCATATCCTAAAGCCGT 16055[35]
AGAATCCACTATTGGGCACC
Virulence
Outer-membrane lipoproteings60GCACATTATATTCTATTGAG42955[36]
AGGCATACTCTAACTTTTGC
o-sialoglycoproteinasegcpCGCCCCTTTTGGTTTTCTAA42058[36]
GTAAATGCCCTTCCATATGG
LeukotoxinlktGTCCCTGTGTTTTCATTATAAG38558[35]
CACTCGATAATTATTCTAAATTAG
Antimicrobial resistance phenotype
CTET, OXYtetRCGGCTTGGGTTAATAATGGCG42558[37]
ATAACGCGAAAAGCTTCCGC
tetHATACTGCTGATCACCGT107660[37]
TCCCAATAAGCGACGCT
TIL, TULmsrEACCAGCCACCTTGATCTCAATG62060[37]
GTTCCATTCGATCCAGTTATAGCG
mphETCTGTAGCGGGTTTCCAATTGC40160[37]
AATGGTTGCTGCGTATTCCTCG
CTET—chlortetracycline, OXY—oxytetracycline, TUL—tulathromycin, TIL—tilmicosin.
Table 2. Susceptibility of the tested strains to antimicrobial agents.
Table 2. Susceptibility of the tested strains to antimicrobial agents.
Antimicrobial Susceptibility
AntimicrobialPasteurella multocidaMannheimia haemolytica
SIRSIR
n/N%n/N%n/N%n/N%n/N%n/N%
CTET9/4818.8%1/482.1%38/4879.2%10/2245.5%2/229.1%10/2245.5%
OXY9/4818.8%0/480.0%39/4881.3%11/2250.0%1/224.5%10/2245.5%
TUL37/4877.1%0/480.0%11/4822.9%9/2240.9%1/224.5%12/2254.5%
TIL34/4870.8%2/484.2%12/4825.0%7/2231.8%1/224.5%14/2263.6%
PEN36/4875.0%3/486.3%9/4818.8%3/2213.6%5/2222.7%14/2263.6%
ENRO44/4891.7%3/486.3%1/482.1%17/2277.3%4/2218.2%1/224.5%
DANO42/4887.5%4/488.3%2/484.2%17/2277.3%2/229.1%3/2213.6%
XNL36/4875.0%5/4810.4%7/4814.6%14/2263.6%1/224.5%7/2231.8%
FFN38/4879.2%9/4818.8%1/482.1%9/2240.9%11/2250.0%2/229.1%
SPE29/4860.4%7/4814.6%12/4825.0%10/2245.5%11/2250.0%1/224.5%
S—susceptible, I—intermediate, R—resistant, CTET—chlortetracycline, OXY—oxytetracycline, TUL—tulathromycin, TIL—tilmicosin, PEN—penicillin, ENRO—enrofloxacin, DANO—danofloxacin, XNL—ceftiofur, FFN—florfenicol, SPE—spectinomycin.
Table 3. Resistance patterns detected among the tested strains of P. multocida and M. haemolytica along with their frequencies.
Table 3. Resistance patterns detected among the tested strains of P. multocida and M. haemolytica along with their frequencies.
Phenotypic Resistance Pattern
No. of Antimicrobial
in Pattern
Antimicrobial NamesP. multocidaM. haemolyticaAll
n/N%n/N%n/N%
1PEN 1/482.1%3/2213.6%4/705.7%
SPE 1/482.1%0/220.0%1/701.4%
2XNL, PEN 1/482.1%0/220.0%1/701.4%
PEN, TIL 0/480.0%1/224.5%1/701.4%
OXY, SPE 1/482.1%0/220.0%1/701.4%
CTET, OXY 18/4837.5%0/220.0%18/7025.7%
3PEN, TIL, TUL 0/480.0%1/224.5%1/701.4%
XNL, CTET, OXY1/482.1%0/220.0%1/701.4%
OXY, PEN, TIL *0/480.0%1/224.5%1/701.4%
CTET, TIL, TUL 0/480.0%1/224.5%1/701.4%
CTET, OXY, SPE 5/4810.4%0/220.0%5/707.1%
4XNL, CTET, OXY, SPE *1/482.1%0/220.0%1/701.4%
XNL, PEN, TIL, TUL *0/480.0%1/224.5%1/701.4%
CTET, OXY, PEN, SPE *1/482.1%0/220.0%1/701.4%
CTET, OXY, TIL, TUL1/482.1%2/229.1%3/704.3%
5XNL, CTET, OXY, TIL, ENRO *1/482.1%0/220.0%1/701.4%
XNL, CTET, OXY, TIL, TUL *1/482.1%0/220.0%1/701.4%
CTET, OXY, PEN, TIL, TUL *4/488.3%0/220.0%4/705.7%
CTET, OXY, SPE, TIL, TUL *2/484.2%0/220.0%2/702.9%
6CTET, OXY, PEN, TIL, TUL, DANO *0/480.0%1/224.5%1/701.4%
XNL, CTET, OXY, PEN, TIL, TUL *1/482.1%4/2218.2%5/707.1%
7CTET, OXY, FFN, PEN, TIL, TUL, DANO *1/482.1%0/220.0%1/701.4%
XNL, CTET, OXY, TIL, TUL, DANO, SPE *1/482.1%0/220.0%1/701.4%
8XNL, CTET, OXY, FFN, PEN, TIL, TUL, DANO *0/480.0%1/224.5%1/701.4%
9not detected- - -
10XNL, CTET, OXY, FFN, PEN, TIL, TUL, DANO, ENRO, SPE *0/480.0%1/224.5%1/701.4%
* Configurations indicating multidrug resistance. CTET—chlortetracycline, OXY—oxytetracycline, TUL—tulathromycin, TIL—tilmicosin, PEN—penicillin, NRO—enrofloxacin, DANO—danofloxacin, XNL—ceftiofur, FFN—florfenicol, SPE—spectinomycin,.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lachowicz-Wolak, A.; Chmielina, A.; Przychodniak, I.; Karwańska, M.; Siedlecka, M.; Klimowicz-Bodys, M.; Dyba, K.; Rypuła, K. Antimicrobial-Resistance and Virulence-Associated Genes of Pasteurella multocida and Mannheimia haemolytica Isolated from Polish Dairy Calves with Symptoms of Bovine Respiratory Disease. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 491. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13030491

AMA Style

Lachowicz-Wolak A, Chmielina A, Przychodniak I, Karwańska M, Siedlecka M, Klimowicz-Bodys M, Dyba K, Rypuła K. Antimicrobial-Resistance and Virulence-Associated Genes of Pasteurella multocida and Mannheimia haemolytica Isolated from Polish Dairy Calves with Symptoms of Bovine Respiratory Disease. Microorganisms. 2025; 13(3):491. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13030491

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lachowicz-Wolak, Agnieszka, Aleksandra Chmielina, Iwona Przychodniak, Magdalena Karwańska, Magdalena Siedlecka, Małgorzata Klimowicz-Bodys, Kamil Dyba, and Krzysztof Rypuła. 2025. "Antimicrobial-Resistance and Virulence-Associated Genes of Pasteurella multocida and Mannheimia haemolytica Isolated from Polish Dairy Calves with Symptoms of Bovine Respiratory Disease" Microorganisms 13, no. 3: 491. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13030491

APA Style

Lachowicz-Wolak, A., Chmielina, A., Przychodniak, I., Karwańska, M., Siedlecka, M., Klimowicz-Bodys, M., Dyba, K., & Rypuła, K. (2025). Antimicrobial-Resistance and Virulence-Associated Genes of Pasteurella multocida and Mannheimia haemolytica Isolated from Polish Dairy Calves with Symptoms of Bovine Respiratory Disease. Microorganisms, 13(3), 491. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13030491

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop