Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Next Article in Journal
Microwave Photonic Signal Processing and Sensing Based on Optical Filtering
Previous Article in Journal
Algorithm for Base Action Set Generation Focusing on Undiscovered Sensor Values
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Structure Design and Analysis of 2 μm InGaAsSb/AlGaAsSb Muti-Quantum Well Laser Diode with Carrier Blocking Layer

Changchun Observatory/NAO, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130117, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2019, 9(1), 162; https://doi.org/10.3390/app9010162
Submission received: 22 November 2018 / Revised: 22 December 2018 / Accepted: 30 December 2018 / Published: 4 January 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Optics and Lasers)

Abstract

:
A low threshold current density of 2 μm InGaAsSb/AlGaAsSb muti-quantum well (MQW) laser diode with carrier blocking layer (CBL) is demonstrated by simulation and fabrication. The carrier leakage is found to be theoretically suppressed for the devices with CBL. All the laser wafers are grown with a solid source Molecular Beam Epitaxy(MBE) System. Experimental results reveal the samples with CBL exhibits ultra-low threshold current densities of 142 A/cm2 and high slope efficiency of 0.158 W/A, which is better than 215 A/cm2 and 0.122 W/A achieved in the conventional InGaAsSb/AlGaAsSb LDs at room temperature. This improvement in device performance comes from meticulously designing the carrier blocking layers to increase carrier confinement and injection efficiency.

1. Introduction

InGaAsSb/AlGaAsSb quaternary quantum well systems have recently become increasingly prominent due to their potential application as semiconductor diode lasers emitting at wavelengths of around 2 μm, which are in high demand for a variety of applications, including fire detection, infrared imaging sensors, molecular spectroscopy and low loss optical fiber communications [1,2,3,4]. However, the high threshold current density, strongly temperature sensitive 2 μm InGaAsSb/AlGaAsSb LDs caused by Auger recombination rates at the MQW active region and large carrier leakage losses in cladding layers remain a great challenge [5,6]. In order to solve this problem, more attention is now focused on the improvement of molecular beam epitaxy(MBE) fabrication technology of antimonide LDs, but the reports about optimization for the structure of 2 μm InGaAsSb/AlGaAsSb LDs are rare. It is reported that a proper increase of the quantum well number in the active region is an effective solution to solve the above problems, but a high number can degrade the output characteristics of LDs [7,8].
Based on band engineering and carrier transportation mechanisms [9,10], 2 μm InGaAsSb/AlGaAsSb muti-quantum well laser diode with carrier blocking layer(CBL) is proposed, with the aim of reducing the threshold current density and improving injection efficiency.

2. Theoretical Analysis

In order to understand the carrier dynamics inside the active region of LDs, the carrier transportation mechanisms are investigated. Figure 1 illustrates the carrier transport process in the InGaAsSb/AlGaAsSb 3QWs LD.
As shown in Figure 1, the electrons injected from the N-side into the active region are captured by the first quantum well, and are transferred to the next quantum well by tunneling or diffusing the barrier. The process is repeated until the electrons flow into the P-side. The energy discontinuity between the waveguide and cladding layers could prevent the minority carriers from following into the high-doped area. But for antimonide materials, the small conduction band offsets reduce the carrier confinement, and the high mobility of carrier electrons further accelerate the minority carriers spilling over the active region. The minority carrier concentration N 1 is calculated by using the following equation [10]:
N 1 = 1 2 π 2 ( 2 m 2 ) 3 2 Δ E c ( E E c ) d E 1 + exp ( E F n k T )
where = h 2 π , h is Planck constant, m is electron effective mass, F n is the Fermi level, and k is the Boltzmann’s constant. Equation (1) indicates that the concentration of minority carriers decreases with increase of the conduction band offset Δ E c .
The electron leakage current density J 1 can be estimated by using the following formula, if only considering the thermionic emission diffusion:
J 1 = e D L N 1
where D and L are the electron diffusion coefficient and length at the P-side respectively. When the carriers are injected into the active region, they can either recombine radiatively or not radiatively. The lowest threshold current density J 2 is modeled as Equation (3).
J 2 = e d τ N t h
where τ is the electron average lifetime and d is the thickness of the active region. Thus, the laser threshold current density J t h is calculated as follows:
J t h = J 1 + J 2 = e D L N 1 + e d τ N t h
From Equation (4), it is known that the laser threshold current density can be reduced with the decrease of carrier leakage. Therefore, a large band offset between the waveguide and cladding layers should be designed elaborately to block the minority carriers from flowing into the high-doped area in order to improve the opto-electrical properties of 2 μm InGaAsSb/AlGaAsSb LDs.

3. Laser Diode Structure Optimization

Based on the band engineering and carrier transportation mechanism [9,10,11], a optimized 2 μm InGaAsSb/AlGaAsSb laser diode with graded carrier blocking layer(CBL) is proposed. The CBL is inserted between the waveguide and cladding layers, which can provide adequate confinement of carriers in the active region. The schematics of proposed design with CBL are given in Figure 2.
As shown in Figure 2, the core region of this laser is constructed by three In0.25G0.75As0.02Sb0.75 undoped wells sandwiched between Al0.25Ga0.75As0.02Sb0.98 barriers. The thickness of wells and barriers are 10 nm and 30 nm respectively. The core region is incorporated in undoped 0.45 μm Al0.25Ga0.75As0.02Sb0.98 broadened waveguide layers. The graded carrier blocking layer(CBL) AlGaAsSb is followed by the waveguide layer, and the next is the cladding layer of Al0.8Ga0.2As0.08Sb0.92 with 1.2 μm in thickness. The n-cladding layer is Te-doped to n = 4 × 1017 cm−3, the p-cladding layer is Be doped to p = 5 × 10−18 cm−3. The GaSb buffer is Te-doped with n = 1 × 10−18 cm−3 and the substrate is oriented Te doped GaSb with n = 1 × 10−19 cm−3.
The CBL with graded Aluminum compositions of x = 0.8–0.25(Al-rich) and x = 0.25–0.8 (Ga-rich) is designed not only to reduce the voltage drop at the interface of heterojunction but also to improve the quality of interface. It is also designed as undoped, taking into account internal factors caused by the impurity scattering and non-radiative recombination. The thickness of CBL is set to be 50 nm to prevent the minority carriers from overflowing to the cladding layers, considering the thermal resistance of the laser diode.

4. Results and Discussion

In order to predict the electrical and optical properties of semiconductor lasers with various structures, an advanced simulation should be conducted in the device design. However, it always failed to simulate the InGaAsSb/AlGaAsSb LDs, due to the lack of an effective material database of the antimonide material system. Based on the basic parameters of related binary compounds and Vegard’s Law, we set up the material database for InGaAsSb/AlGaAsSb LDs and simulate the devices with and without CBL by Pics3d software package. The key material parameters are shown in Table 1.
The simulated band diagrams and distributions of the carrier concentrations in the InGaAsSb/AlGaAsSb LDs without and with CBL are shown in Figure 3a,b, respectively. It can be seen that electrons and holes meet in the quantum wells and recombine completely. However, a large portion of the electrons from the n-side into the MQW leak into the p-cladding layer. This electron leakage strongly depends on the band offset between the waveguide and the cladding layers. According to Figure 3, the effective barrier height for minority electrons is increased from 0.448 eV to 1.022 eV with the insert of CBL into the InGaAsSb/AlGaAsSb LDs, which results in a remarkable reduction in the concentration of electrons injected into the p-cladding layer. The concentration of electrons leakage is also down from 107 cm−3 to near 0. Meanwhile, the CBL also reduces the barrier height for holes in the p-side from 0.291 eV to 0.112 eV, which can enhance hole injection efficiency. As for the N-side, the △Ev for minority holes is slightly increased from 0.953 eV to 1.024 eV, which leads to the concentration of holes leakage being reduced from 102 cm−3 to 101.5 cm−3.
Figure 4 plots the simulated radiative recombination rates in the active region of the two various structures. It is obviously seen that the radiative recombination rates in the last quantum well are the highest ones. This can be attributed to the highest carrier concentration accumulated in the last QWs next to the p-type layer. The higher radiative recombination rates in the active region are also observed for the devices with CBL, which proved that the CBL can result in a reduction of the carrier leakage and enhancement of the carriers injection in the active region.
The simulated P-I (optical power-current) characteristics for the 0.8-mm-long devices with and without CBL having the stripe width of 90 μm resonator length are illustrated in Figure 5. It can be found that the threshold current density is reduced from 197 A/cm2 to 126 A/cm2 and the differential efficiency ( η d ) is increased from 0.154 W/A to 0.193 W/A due to the optimization of the epitaxial structure design.
Furthermore, in order to predict the beam quality of the new-proposed laser diode, the far-filed radiation profiles are also simulated. The vertical divergence angles are only 40° as shown in Figure 6, which is better than most of these devices.
Based on our previous experience and research for this work [11,12], the 2 μm InGaAsSb/AlGaAsSb samples without and with CBL are fabricated by using solid source molecular beam epitaxy(MBE) technology to further text these predictions. After growth, the Ti/Pt/Au is deposited as the P-electrode, the wafer is thinned to about 90 μm in thickness, and then deposited with AuGeNi/Au bottom contact and alloyed. All the wafer is cleaved into Fabry-Perot laser chips with cavity length of 800 μm by conventional steps. The structures are mounted epi-side down onto copper heat sinks, and the facets are kept uncoated.
The CW output power and operation voltage characteristics versus current of the various devices are illustrated in Figure 7. It can be seen that the optimized 2 μm InGaAsSb/AlGaAsSb LD with CBL exhibited the threshold current density is as low as 142 A/cm2 and η d is 0.158 W/A, while for the conventional devices, the threshold current density of the fabricated is 215 A/cm2 and η d is 0.122 W/A. The experimental results are basically in agreement with the theoretical results, the small difference comes from the unavoidable technological and processing error.

5. Conclusions

In summary, we have demonstrated a 2 μm InGaAsSb/AlGaAsSb laser diode with a graded composition AlGaAsSb carrier blocking layer(CBL) emitting at 2 μm by simulation and fabrication. The material database of InGaAsSb/AlGaAsSb LDs is set up to predict the optical and electronical properties of devices. The simulation results indicate that the graded interlayer can reduce the concentration of electrons leakage from 107 cm−3 to near 0, which results in a significant improvement in the radiative recombination rate and leads to a reduction of threshold current density compared to the conventional LDs. All the laser wafers are grown by using a solid source MBE system. The threshold density and slope efficiency of the optimized InGaAsSb/AlGaAsSb LD with CBL is 142 A/cm2 and 0.158 W/A, which is better than 215 A/cm2 and 0.122 W/A achieved in un-optimized devices at room temperature. This effect is attributed to an improved carrier injection and confinement that prevents carrier leakage into the high-doped region of the LDs while simultaneously enhancing carrier injection into the active region.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Ning An and Lei Ma; methodology, Ning An and Guanyu Wen; software, Zhipeng Liang and Haitao Zhang; validation, Tianshu Gao, Haitao Zhang and Lei Ma; formal analysis, Ning An; investigation, Ning An; resources, Haitao Zhang and Cunbo Fan; data curation, Haitao Zhang and Cunbo Fan; writing—original draft preparation, Ning An; writing—review and editing, Ning An; visualization, Zhipeng Liang; supervision, Cunbo Fan; project administration, Ning An; funding acquisition, Ning An.

Funding

This research was funded by Excellent Youth Foundation of Jilin Province Scientific committee: 20170520155JH, National Natural Science Foundation of China: 61605220.

Acknowledgments

The content is supported by Key Laboratory of Space Object and Debris Observation, Purple Mountain Observatory, Chinese Academy of Science.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, T.C.; Ni, Q.F.; Liu, X.Z.; Yu, B.; Wang, Y.X.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, X.P.; Wang, Y.B.; Xu, Y. MBE Growth of 2.3μm InGaAsSb/AlGaAsSb Strained Multiple Quantum Well Diode Lasers. Key Eng. Mater. 2013, 552, 389–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Shterengas, L.; Belenky, G.L.; Gourevitch, A. Measurements of -factor in 2–2.5 μm type-I In(AI) GaAsSb/GaSb high power diode lasers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002, 81, 4517–4518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, W.; Heroux, J.B.; Shao, H.; Wang, W.I. Strain-compensated InGaAsSb/AlGaAsSb mid-infrared quantum-well lasers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2004, 84, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lin, B.; Wen, X.; Guo, F. Influence of cladding layer field of slab waveguide on M2 factor. Chin. Opt. Lett. 2003, 1, 11–13. [Google Scholar]
  5. Xing, J.L.; Zhang, Y.; Liao, Y.P.; Wang, J.; Xiang, W.; Xu, Y.; Wang, G.; Ren, Z.; Niu, Z. Room-Temperature Operation of 2.4 μm InGaAsSb/AlGaAsSb Quantum-Well Laser Diodes with Low-Threshold Current Density. Chin. Phys. Lett. 2014, 31, 054204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jia, G.Z.; Yao, J.B.; Liu, G.L.; Bai, T.G.; Liu R.B; Xing, X.D. Effect of Auger recombination on the threshold current of strained quantum well laser. Chin. J. Quantum Electron. 2007, 24, 105–109. [Google Scholar]
  7. Vizbaras, K.; Vizbaras, A.; Andrejew, A.; Grasse, C.; Sprengel, S.; Amann, M.-C. Room-Temperature Type-I GaSb-Based Lasers in the 3.0–3.7 μm Wavelength Range; Novel In-Plane Semiconductor Lasers XI; International Society for Optics and Photonics: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2012; Volume 23. [Google Scholar]
  8. Adachi, S. Properties of Semiconductor Alloys: Group-IV, III–V and II–VI Semiconductors; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  9. Coldren, L.A.; Corzine, S.W. Diode Lasers and Photonic Integrated Circuits; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  10. Buda, M. Low-Confinement High-Power Semiconductor Lasers; Technische Universit Eitndhoven: Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  11. An, N.; Dong, X.; Song, Q.; Zhang, H.; Wen, G.; Zhao, G.; Shi, J.; Kang, Z. Optimization for designing the waveguide of 980 nm AlGaAs/InGaAs semiconductor laser. Optik 2015, 126, 3477–3481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, Z.G.; Liu, G.J.; You, M.H.; Li, L.; Li, M.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, B.S.; Wang, X.H. 2.0 μm room temperature CW operation of InGaAsSb/AlGaAsSb laser with asymmetric waveguide structure. Laser Phys. 2009, 19, 1230–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of carrier leakage of InGaAsSb/AlGaAsSb 3QW LD.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of carrier leakage of InGaAsSb/AlGaAsSb 3QW LD.
Applsci 09 00162 g001
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of InGaAsSb/AlGaAsSb 3QW LD with CBL.
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of InGaAsSb/AlGaAsSb 3QW LD with CBL.
Applsci 09 00162 g002
Figure 3. band diagrams and carrier concentrations distributions in the various InGaAsSb/AlGaAsSb 3QW LDs at 400 mA (a) Without CBL (b) With CBL. The grey shadow indicates the bandgap and the blue shadow indicates the location of the carrier blocking layer.
Figure 3. band diagrams and carrier concentrations distributions in the various InGaAsSb/AlGaAsSb 3QW LDs at 400 mA (a) Without CBL (b) With CBL. The grey shadow indicates the bandgap and the blue shadow indicates the location of the carrier blocking layer.
Applsci 09 00162 g003
Figure 4. Radiative recombination rate of various InGaAsSb/AlGaAsSb 3QWS LDs at 400 mA.
Figure 4. Radiative recombination rate of various InGaAsSb/AlGaAsSb 3QWS LDs at 400 mA.
Applsci 09 00162 g004
Figure 5. Simulated P-I characteristics of various InGaAsSb/AlGaAsSb 3QW LDs.
Figure 5. Simulated P-I characteristics of various InGaAsSb/AlGaAsSb 3QW LDs.
Applsci 09 00162 g005
Figure 6. Simulated vertical angle divergence of 2 μm InGaAsSb/AlGaAsSb LDs with CBL.
Figure 6. Simulated vertical angle divergence of 2 μm InGaAsSb/AlGaAsSb LDs with CBL.
Applsci 09 00162 g006
Figure 7. CW output power characteristics measured at 300 K for the various InGaAsSb/AlGaAsSb LDs with 90 µm stripe width (a) Without CBL (b) With CBL.
Figure 7. CW output power characteristics measured at 300 K for the various InGaAsSb/AlGaAsSb LDs with 90 µm stripe width (a) Without CBL (b) With CBL.
Applsci 09 00162 g007
Table 1. Key parameters of related binary compounds in antimonide material database.
Table 1. Key parameters of related binary compounds in antimonide material database.
GaAsInAsAlAsGaSbAlSbInSb
a0 (Å)5.65236.05845.66056.09596.1366.479
dielectric-constant13.115.1510.114.810.316.8
electron-mass0.0670.0260.150.0390.140.0135
affinity4.074.073.54.063.654.59
c1111.98.3312.028.8428.7696.487
c125.384.535.74.0264.3413.735
Eg (eV)1.4240.359530.7252.30.1737
real-index3.653.8923.0063.97313.294
electron-mobility0.8510.020.220.025
hole-mobility0.0040.0360.2790.10.040.07
thermal-kappa552.7 32 18

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

An, N.; Ma, L.; Wen, G.; Liang, Z.; Zhang, H.; Gao, T.; Fan, C. Structure Design and Analysis of 2 μm InGaAsSb/AlGaAsSb Muti-Quantum Well Laser Diode with Carrier Blocking Layer. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 162. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9010162

AMA Style

An N, Ma L, Wen G, Liang Z, Zhang H, Gao T, Fan C. Structure Design and Analysis of 2 μm InGaAsSb/AlGaAsSb Muti-Quantum Well Laser Diode with Carrier Blocking Layer. Applied Sciences. 2019; 9(1):162. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9010162

Chicago/Turabian Style

An, Ning, Lei Ma, Guanyu Wen, Zhipeng Liang, Haitao Zhang, Tianshu Gao, and Cunbo Fan. 2019. "Structure Design and Analysis of 2 μm InGaAsSb/AlGaAsSb Muti-Quantum Well Laser Diode with Carrier Blocking Layer" Applied Sciences 9, no. 1: 162. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9010162

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop