Experimental Study on Mechanical Properties of Marine Mud Slurry Treated by Flocculation-Solidification-High Pressure Filtration Combined Method
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Laboratory Experiments
2.1. Materials
2.2. Testing Procedures
- (1)
- Sedimentation tests
- (a)
- Set the initial dry weight of the mud sample (300 g) and the initial water content of the marine mud slurry (300%), and calculate the amount of experimental materials required.
- (b)
- Sequentially add water and Ca(OH)2 to the marine mud slurry, and mix them at a constant speed using a multi-function mixer for 5 min. Then, manually stir the slurry for half a minute (to avoid insufficient mechanical mixing) to obtain a homogeneous slurry mixture.
- (c)
- Add the APAM solution to the slurry mixture and stir thoroughly to obtain a composite flocculant mixture.
- (d)
- Pour the composite flocculant mixture evenly into a 1.5 L capacity graduated cylinder, ensuring consistent initial liquid level height. In the initial stage of the experiment, record the sludge–water interface separation value every hour, and later, record it every 2 h until the value remains constant.
- (2)
- Pressure filtration tests
- (a)
- Use an electric agitator to uniformly mix the original marine mud slurry and take a sample to obtain its natural water content. Based on the natural water content of the mud slurry and the predetermined mix ratio, calculate the required masses of water, Ca(OH)2, OPC, and GGBS for the experiment.
- (b)
- Based on the calculation results from step (a), add the required amounts of water, Ca(OH)2, OPC, and GGBS sequentially to the slurry. Use a multifunctional mixer to thoroughly stir the slurry to obtain the mixture. The mixing process includes 5 min machine mixing in the beginning, 1 min hand mixing in the middle, and 3 min machine mixing in the end.
- (c)
- Add APAM solution to the slurry and use a stirring machine to mix it evenly. Slow down the stirring speed when agglomerates begin to form. Stop stirring when the supernatant liquid separates from the mixed slurry.
- (d)
- A specially developed device is used, as shown in Figure 2. This device is similar to a piston, through which the mud slurry can be dewatered, as demonstrated in the relevant standard [40]. Pour the mixed slurry into a geo-bag using a funnel and close the zipper. Then, place the geo-bag in trough I and secure the cover plate on top of the pressure chamber using high-strength bolts. The material chosen for the geo-bags in this test was polypropylene fiber, which effectively prevents the seepage of mud particles and exhibits good permeability. The geo-bags had a planar dimension of 30 cm × 30 cm, and the maximum thickness was 20 cm. The aperture diameter of the geo-bags was 48 um.
- (e)
- A hydraulic jack is used to apply pressure to the geo-bag and maintain the hydraulic pressure gauge reading at 15 MPa for 12 min. Observe the pressure gauge readings and control the pressure level accordingly.
- (f)
- Mud cake is obtained after the pressurization is completed. To ensure uniform initial water content for each sample, when taking samples with a ring cutter, avoid the edge of the mud cake. The samples are cylindrical, 61.8 mm in diameter and 20 mm in height. Place the sample into sealed bags and conduct the curing process. The curing temperature of the water bath incubator is 20 ± 3 °C, and the curing ages are 7 days, 14 days, 21 days, and 28 days, respectively. After the samples reach the curing age, conduct water content tests and direct shear tests [41,42].
2.3. Testing Program
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Feasibility Exploration Tests for the FSHCM
3.2. Effects of APAM Dose on the Dewatering Performance of FSHCM-MS
3.3. Effects of Composite Solidification Agent on the Shear Characteristics of FSHCM-MS
3.4. Effects of Initial Water Content on the Shear Characteristics of FSHCM-MS
3.5. Effects of the Initial Thickness of Geo-Bags on the Shear Characteristics of FSHCM-MS
4. Conclusions
- Compared to the FHCM, the cohesion of the samples treated by the FSHCM decreased by 104.89 kPa at 28 days. Compared with FSCM, the FSHCM saved 14% of the composite solidification agent and increased cohesion by 94.59 kPa at 28 days. By comparing the water content and cohesion of mud cake treated by three methods, it was found that the FSHCM is more efficient.
- When the APAM dose was 0.16%, FSHCM-MS exhibited a noticeable flocculation effect. As the APAM dose increased, the dewatering efficiency of FSHCM-MS improved. However, the water use efficiency value η decreased, and mechanical mixing time increased. Considering all factors, the optimal dose of APAM was determined as 0.16%.
- The composite solidification agent dose had little effect on the dewatering efficiency of the FSHCM. The initial water content of the marine mud slurry had a significant effect on the dewatering efficiency of the combined method when it varied between 100% and 400%. Higher initial water content in the mud led to better dewatering results. As the initial thickness of geo-bags increased, the initial water content of the mud cake remained constant at first, and then gradually increased.
- An increase in composite solidification agent dose led to a higher rate of increase in the shear strength and cohesion of mud cake. As the initial water content of the marine mud slurry rose, the shear strength and cohesion of the mud cake increased. Moreover, an increase in the initial thickness of the geo-bags led to a decrease in the shear strength and cohesion of the mud cake.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Chrysochoou, M.; Grubb, D.G.; Drengler, K.L.; Malasavage, N.E. Stabilized Dredged Material. III: Mineralogical Perspective. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 2010, 136, 1037–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, G.; Gao, Y.; Hong, Z.; Ding, J. Sedimentation behavior of four dredged slurries in China. Mar. Georesour. Geotechnol. 2012, 30, 143–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, L.; Hong, Z.; Tian, W.; Shi, J. Settling behavior of clay suspensions produced by dredging activities in China. Mar. Georesour. Geotechnol. 2018, 36, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.Y.; Fu, J.Y.; Zhang, C.; Yang, J.S. Shield Tunnel Engineering, Chapter 10 Slurry Treatment for Shield Tunnelling and Waste Slurry Recycling; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Foged, S.; Duerinckx, L.; Vandekeybus, J. An innovative and sustainable solution for sediment disposal problems. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth World Dredging Congress, Lake Buena Vista, FL, USA, 27 May–1 June 2007; pp. 1513–1528. [Google Scholar]
- Spadaro, P.; Rosenthal, L. River and harbor remediation:“polluter pays,” alternative finance, and the promise of a “circular economy”. J. Soils Sediments 2020, 20, 4238–4247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hussan, A.; Levacher, D.; Mezazigh, S. Investigation of natural dewatering of dredged sediments incorporating evaporation and drainage. Dry. Technol. 2023, 41, 2227–2240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheehan, C.; Harrington, J. Management of dredge material in the Republic of Ireland–A review. Waste Manag. 2012, 32, 1031–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Levacher, D.; Sanchez, M. Characterization of marine sediments for a reuse in land disposal and embankment. Eur. J. Environ. Civ. Eng. 2011, 15, 167–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zentar, R.; Dubois, V.; Abriak, N.E. Mechanical behaviour and environmental impacts of a test road built with marine dredged sediments. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2008, 52, 947–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Achour, R.; Abriak, N.-E.; Zentar, R.; Rivard, P.; Gregoire, P. Valorization of unauthorized sea disposal dredged sediments as a road foundation material. Environ. Technol. 2014, 35, 1997–2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Samara, M.; Lafhaj, Z.; Chapiseau, C. Valorization of stabilized river sediments in fired clay bricks: Factory scale experiment. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 163, 701–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, L.; Gao, X.; Zhuang, D.; Guo, W.; Hou, J.; Liu, X. Pilot tests on vacuum preloading method combined with short and long PVDs. Geotext. Geomembr. 2018, 46, 243–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, H.; Weng, Z.; Liu, S.; Geng, X.; Pan, X.; Cai, Y.; Shi, L. Compression and consolidation behaviors of lime-treated dredging slurry under vacuum pressure. Eng. Geol. 2020, 270, 105573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Ni, J.; Cai, Y.; Fu, H.; Wang, P. Combination of vacuum preloading and lime treatment for improvement of dredged fill. Eng. Geol. 2017, 227, 149–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Cai, Y.; Ma, J.; Chu, J.; Fu, H.; Wang, P.; Jin, Y. Improved vacuum preloading method for consolidation of dredged clay-slurry fill. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 2016, 142, 06016012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Y.; Cai, Y.; Yuan, G.; Wang, J.; Fu, H.; Hu, X.; Geng, X.; Li, M.; Liu, J.; Jin, H. Effect of tamping interval on consolidation of dredged slurry using vacuum preloading combined with dynamic consolidation. Acta Geotech. 2021, 16, 859–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, Y.; Pan, F.; Zhang, B.; Wang, X.; Diao, H. Laboratory test of waste mud treated by the flocculation-vacuum-curing integrated method. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 328, 127086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boutouil, M. Traitement des Vases de Dragage par Stabilisation/Solidification à Base de Ciment et Additifs (Treatment of Dredging Muds by Stabilization/Solidification with Cement and Additives). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Le Havre, Le Havre, France, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Lahtinen, P.; Forsman, J.; Kiukkonen, P.; Kreft-Burman, K.; Niutanen, V. Mass stabilisation as a method of treatment of contaminated sediments. In Proceedings of the South Baltic Conference on Dredged Materials in Dike Construction, Rostock, Germany, 10–12 April 2014; pp. 145–155.
- Lirer, S.; Liguori, B.; Capasso, I.; Flora, A.; Caputo, D. Mechanical and chemical properties of composite materials made of dredged sediments in a fly-ash based geopolymer. J. Environ. Manag. 2017, 191, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoobanpot, N.; Jamsawang, P.; Poorahong, H.; Jongpradist, P.; Likitlersuang, S. Multiscale laboratory investigation of the mechanical and microstructural properties of dredged sediments stabilized with cement and fly ash. Eng. Geol. 2020, 267, 105491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Horpibulsuk, S.; Rachan, R.; Suddeepong, A. Assessment of strength development in blended cement admixed Bangkok clay. Constr. Build. Mater. 2011, 25, 1521–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sollars, C.; Perry, R. Cement-based stabilization of wastes: Practical and theoretical considerations. Water Environ. J. 1989, 3, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yamashita, E.; Cikmit, A.A.; Tsuchida, T.; Hashimoto, R. Strength estimation of cement-treated marine clay with wide ranges of sand and initial water contents. Soils Found. 2020, 60, 1065–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vu, M.C.; Satomi, T.; Takahashi, H. Influence of initial water, moisture, and geopolymer content on geopolymer modified sludge. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 235, 117420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, Y.; Luo, B.; Luo, Z.; Xu, F.; Huang, H.; Long, Z.; Shen, C. Mechanical characteristics and solidification mechanism of slag/fly ash-based geopolymer and cement solidified organic clay: A comparative study. J. Build. Eng. 2023, 71, 106459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arjmand, R.; Massinaei, M.; Behnamfard, A. Improving flocculation and dewatering performance of iron tailings thickeners. J. Water Process Eng. 2019, 31, 100873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maraschin, M.; Ferrari, K.F.H.; Carissimi, E. Acidification and flocculation of sludge from a water treatment plant: New action mechanisms. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020, 252, 117417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wakeman, R.; Tarleton, S. Solid/Liquid Separation: Principles of Industrial Filtration; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, R.; Dong, C.; Lu, Z.; Pu, H. Strength characteristics of hydraulically dredged mud slurry treated by flocculation-solidification combined method. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 228, 116742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ASTM D2487-11; Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System). ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2017.
- Amuda, O.; Amoo, I. Coagulation/flocculation process and sludge conditioning in beverage industrial wastewater treatment. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 141, 778–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jin, L.; Zhang, P.; Zhang, G.; Li, J. Study of sludge moisture distribution and dewatering characteristic after cationic polyacrylamide (C-PAM) conditioning. Desalin Water Treat. 2016, 57, 29377–29383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, J.; McLaughlin, R.A. Simple systems for treating pumped, turbid water with flocculants and a geotextile dewatering bag. J. Environ. Manag. 2016, 182, 208–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Preetham, H.; Nayak, S. Geotechnical investigations on marine clay stabilized using granulated blast furnace slag and cement. Int. J. Geosynth. Groun 2019, 5, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bertrand, G.; Roy, P.; Filiatre, C.; Coddet, C. Spray-dried ceramic powders: A quantitative correlation between slurry characteristics and shapes of the granules. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2005, 60, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, Y.; Yang, Y.; Fan, R.; Wang, F. Effects of phosphate dispersants on the liquid limit, sediment volume and apparent viscosity of clayey soil/calcium-bentonite slurry wall backfills. KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 2016, 20, 670–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, J.; Chu, J.; Tan, S.K.; Vu, T.T.; Lam, K.P. Sedimentation behavior of flocculant-treated soil slurry. Mar. Georesour. Geotechnol. 2017, 35, 593–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- EN 14701-2:2013 (E); Characterisation of Sludges-Filtration Properties-Part 2: Determination of the Specific Resistance to Filtration. CEN—UNI EN: Brussels, Belgium, 2013.
- ASTM D2216-19; Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Determination of Water (Moisture) Content of Soil and Rock by Mass. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2019.
- ASTM D7702/D7702M-14; Standard Guide for Considerations When Evaluating Direct Shear Results Involving Geosynthetics. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2021.
Specific Density Gs | Liquid Limit wL | Plastic Limit wP | Plasticity Index | Organic Content (Ignition Loss) mo | Sand Fraction (0.075–2 mm) | Silt Fraction (0.002–075 mm) | Clay and Colloid Fraction (<0.002 mm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.69 | 56.1% | 26.7% | 29.4 | 4.41% | 14.9% | 79.5% | 5.6% |
Group | Test | wei (%) | M (kg) | C (%) | APAM (%) | Ca(OH)2 (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | A1 | 200 | 2.5 | 6 | 0.16 | 1.5 |
A2 | 200 | 0.3 | 0 | 0.16 | 1.5 | |
A3 | 200 | 2.5 | 20 | 0.16 | 1.5 | |
B | B1 | 300 | 0.3 | - | 0 | 1.5 |
B2 | 300 | 0.3 | - | 0.04 | 1.5 | |
B3 | 300 | 0.3 | - | 0.08 | 1.5 | |
B4 | 300 | 0.3 | - | 0.12 | 1.5 | |
B5 | 300 | 0.3 | - | 0.16 | 1.5 | |
B6 | 300 | 0.3 | - | 0.20 | 1.5 | |
B7 | 300 | 0.3 | - | 0.24 | 1.5 | |
B8 | 300 | 0.3 | - | 0.28 | 1.5 | |
B9 | 200 | 2.5 | - | 0 | 1.5 | |
B10 | 200 | 2.5 | - | 0.16 | 1.5 | |
B11 | 200 | 2.5 | - | 0.20 | 1.5 | |
B12 | 200 | 2.5 | - | 0.24 | 1.5 | |
B13 | 200 | 2.5 | - | 0.28 | 1.5 | |
C | C1 | 200 | 2.5 | 3 | 0.16 | 1.5 |
C2 | 200 | 2.5 | 5 | 0.16 | 1.5 | |
C3 | 200 | 2.5 | 7 | 0.16 | 1.5 | |
C4 | 200 | 2.5 | 9 | 0.16 | 1.5 | |
D | D1 | 100 | 2.5 | 6 | 0.12 | 1.5 |
D2 | 200 | 2.5 | 6 | 0.12 | 1.5 | |
D3 | 300 | 2.5 | 6 | 0.12 | 1.5 | |
D4 | 400 | 2.5 | 6 | 0.12 | 1.5 | |
D5 | 500 | 2.5 | 6 | 0.12 | 1.5 | |
D6 | 600 | 2.5 | 6 | 0.12 | 1.5 | |
E | E1 | 200 | 2.5 | 6 | 0.16 | 1.5 |
E2 | 200 | 3.0 | 6 | 0.16 | 1.5 | |
E3 | 200 | 3.5 | 6 | 0.16 | 1.5 | |
E4 | 200 | 4.0 | 6 | 0.16 | 1.5 | |
E5 | 200 | 4.5 | 6 | 0.16 | 1.5 | |
E6 | 200 | 5.0 | 6 | 0.16 | 1.5 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Han, C.; Xie, H.; Bai, B.; Zhang, R.; Gao, Y.; Zhao, Z. Experimental Study on Mechanical Properties of Marine Mud Slurry Treated by Flocculation-Solidification-High Pressure Filtration Combined Method. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2023, 11, 2270. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11122270
Han C, Xie H, Bai B, Zhang R, Gao Y, Zhao Z. Experimental Study on Mechanical Properties of Marine Mud Slurry Treated by Flocculation-Solidification-High Pressure Filtration Combined Method. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2023; 11(12):2270. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11122270
Chicago/Turabian StyleHan, Chao, Hongping Xie, Bin Bai, Rongjun Zhang, Yingchao Gao, and Zhekun Zhao. 2023. "Experimental Study on Mechanical Properties of Marine Mud Slurry Treated by Flocculation-Solidification-High Pressure Filtration Combined Method" Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 11, no. 12: 2270. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11122270