Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Next Article in Journal
Thermal Conductivity Analysis and Lifetime Testing of Suspension Plasma-Sprayed Thermal Barrier Coatings
Next Article in Special Issue
Photocatalytic Activity and Stability of Porous Polycrystalline ZnO Thin-Films Grown via a Two-Step Thermal Oxidation Process
Previous Article in Journal
Noise Reduction Properties of an Experimental Bituminous Slurry with Crumb Rubber Incorporated by the Dry Process
Previous Article in Special Issue
Tuning the Photocatalytic Activity of Anatase TiO2 Thin Films by Modifying the Preferred <001> Grain Orientation with Reactive DC Magnetron Sputtering
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Self-Cleaning Photocatalytic Polyurethane Coatings Containing Modified C60 Fullerene Additives

Chemistry Division, Naval Research Laboratory, 4555 Overlook Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20375, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2014, 4(3), 614-629; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings4030614
Submission received: 30 May 2014 / Revised: 8 July 2014 / Accepted: 25 July 2014 / Published: 13 August 2014

Abstract

:
Surfaces are often coated with paint for improved aesthetics and protection; however, additional functionalities that impart continuous self-decontaminating and self-cleaning properties would be extremely advantageous. In this report, photochemical additives based on C60 fullerene were incorporated into polyurethane coatings to investigate their coating compatibility and ability to impart chemical decontaminating capability to the coating surface. C60 exhibits unique photophysical properties, including the capability to generate singlet oxygen upon exposure to visible light; however, C60 fullerene exhibits poor solubility in solvents commonly employed in coating applications. A modified C60 containing a hydrophilic moiety was synthesized to improve polyurethane compatibility and facilitate segregation to the polymer–air interface. Bulk properties of the polyurethane films were analyzed to investigate additive–coating compatibility. Coatings containing photoactive additives were subjected to self-decontamination challenges against representative chemical contaminants and the effects of additive loading concentration, light exposure, and time on chemical decontamination are reported. Covalent attachment of an ethylene glycol tail to C60 improved its solubility and dispersion in a hydrophobic polyurethane matrix. Decomposition products resulting from oxidation were observed in addition to a direct correlation between additive loading concentration and decomposition of surface-residing contaminants. The degradation pathways deduced from contaminant challenge byproduct analyses are detailed.

1. Introduction

Chemical toxicants such as pesticides and toxic industrial chemicals have the potential to contaminate material surfaces for extended periods of time. Often the natural attenuation of toxic substances through evaporation and degradation in ambient environments occurs slowly due to low vapor pressure, poor solubility, and resistance to hydrolysis [1]. Due to this persistence, surfaces on which toxic chemicals reside pose human exposure risks that require application of decontamination solutions to completely render a surface safe. However, decontamination solutions and procedures are cumbersome, expensive, and often damaging to the contaminated substrate [2].
Polymeric coatings are typically applied to many surfaces to improve aesthetics and provide corrosion or weathering protection; therefore, they provide an ideal substrate to incorporate coating additives to impart continuous self-decontaminating behavior at the surface and reduce subsequent contamination. A minimal loading concentration of additive is ideal so that the properties beneficial for the originally intended purpose of the polymer coating are maintained. Specifically, polyurethanes are of the broadest interest owing to their properties such as chemical resistance and durability [3].
Several recent research developments have investigated the incorporation of novel reactive additives into various urethane coating formulations in attempts to create coatings that self-decontaminate. Antimicrobial coatings have been successfully created by imparting additives such as nonionic biocides [4], quaternary ammonium biocides [5,6], surface concentrating biocides [7], functionalized coatings [8,9], and antimicrobial peptides [10]. While these are successful biocidal additives, less success has been achieved in chemical decontaminating coatings. One reason is that additives for chemical decontamination are limited to only a few modes of action such as absorption, hydrolysis, and oxidation. Of these, oxidation offers the greatest potential to completely detoxify a broad spectrum of chemical contaminants [11].
C60 fullerene molecules have also been observed to exhibit intriguing photochemical properties, including oxidative capabilities, which hold exciting potential for development of a self-decontaminating coating [12,13,14,15]. Upon exposure to visible light, C60 fullerene is first excited to its singlet state C60 (1C60), which then through intersystem crossing (ISC), forms the triplet state species of C60 (3C60). 3C60 has a lifetime on the order of μs whereas 1C60 exhibits a lifetime of several ns [12,16,17,18]. This triplet state species of fullerene has the ability to convert ground state triplet oxygen (3Σg) into singlet oxygen (1Δg), a reactive oxygen species (ROS) [13,19]. The combination of a high quantum yield [13] and low rate of degradation of C60 fullerene by ROS [12] make this molecule extremely attractive as a photo-active coating additive.
Extensive studies have been conducted to analyze and characterize the photosensitivity of C60 in solution with varying degrees of success [16,19,20,21,22,23,24]. Various photosensitizers have been shown to exhibit antimicrobial activity when incorporated into polyurethane coating systems under specific conditions [25,26,27]. Similarly, antiviral systems have successfully been developed with the incorporation of fullerene as a solid-phase photosensitizer into biological fluid [28]. Recently, fullerenes modified with intercage constituents have displayed a remarkable ability to produce singlet oxygen as well as antimicrobial activity in polymeric adhesive films [29]. However, insertion of intercage constituents into fullerenes introduces additional cost and complexity that may be avoided by utilizing neat C60.
Incorporation of C60 fullerene into polymer matrices has been investigated for applications ranging from photovoltaics [30] to augmentation of polymer mechanical properties [31]. Covalent incorporation of C60 fullerene into polymers offers controlled distribution and reduced leaching, albeit often at the sacrifice of photoactivity [32,33]. In contrast, non-covalent incorporation of C60 fullerene offers simplified formulation and unaffected photophysical properties [34]. Furthermore, non-covalent incorporation of an amphiphilic fullerene species affords the potential for surface segregating photoactive additives. While synthetic modification of C60 into an amphiphilic species most likely will affect the photophysical properties of C60, increased concentration of a photoactive additive at the surface of a polymer due to its amphiphilic character should improve the decomposition of surface-residing chemical contaminants.
It can be assumed that when incorporated into a polymer matrix, the photoactivity of fullerene may be reduced due to a lack of molecular oxygen available to the fullerene molecule if it is encapsulated into the bulk of the polymeric coating. However, if one is able to overcome this limitation, significant activity should remain at the coating–air interface. It should then be expected that the production of ROS would result and subsequently react with any contamination that may be on the surface. Furthermore, an amphiphilic additive that automatically segregates to the polymer–air interface during a film cure would improve decontaminating efficiency. The hypothesis proposed herein is that the fullerene contained in the coating produces singlet oxygen from the atmosphere by the aforementioned mechanism and subsequently reacts with undesired contamination analytes that are present on the surface. If such analytes are hazardous, such as the case of pesticides or chemical warfare agents, then the action of the additive in the coating should reduce the hazard and subsequently present a surface free from contamination.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Materials

All purchased chemicals were reagent grade and were used without further purification. The purchase of 2-chloroethyl phenyl sulfide was made at Sigma–Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Demeton-S was purchased from Chem Service (West Chester, PA, USA). Refined C60 fullerene was purchased from MER Corporation (Tucson, AZ, USA).

2.2. Synthesis of EO3–C60

Covalent attachment of triethylene glycol monomethyl ether to C60 fullerene through azide addition was performed following a previously described method [35]. Product was confirmed by 1H NMR performed in CDCl3 on a Bruker 300 MHz nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometer with a TMS internal standard. Characterization data is consistent with that previously reported [35].

2.3. Polymer Preparation

A commercial polyurethane resin, Tecoflex EG-100A (Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc., Gastonia, NC, USA), was employed to investigate behavior of additives in controlled polymer solutions. Polymer solutions were prepared (0.1 g polymer in 1 mL chloroform), to which photoactive additives, C60 and EO3–C60, were incorporated. After addition of additives, the solutions were vigorously vortexed to ensure complete mixing. After allowing for air bubbles to escape, polymer solutions were poured out into aluminum pans, loosely covered, and allowed to dry. Films with final additive concentrations of 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.5, and 5.0 wt% were prepared.

2.4. Coating Characterization

Free coatings were peeled from aluminum backing and weighed prior to analysis on a TA Instruments (New Castle, DE, USA) DSC Q20 differential scanning calorimeter. Under a nitrogen flow of 50 mL/min, the DSC was first equilibrated to −70 °C. The temperature was then ramped from −70 °C to 170 °C at a rate of 20 °C/min. The procedure was repeated for a second scan with a ramp rate of 10 °C/min. Glass transition temperature (Tg) measurements were calculated based on the second scan using Universal Analysis 2000 software. The second scan was used for this value to eliminate any contamination of entrapped volatile and low molecular weight byproducts, as well as demonstrate hysteresis. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed on a TA Instruments Q50 TGA employing heating rates of 10 °C/min under a N2 atmosphere. A Thermo Scientific Nicolet 6700 FTIR (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with a diamond crystal ATR attachment was utilized for film analysis. Diffuse reflectance was utilized in the characterization of neat C60 and EO3–C60. X-ray diffraction measurements were performed using a Rigaku SmartLab X-ray Diffractometer (XRD, Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan). The SmartLab XRD was equipped with a Cu anode operating at 3 kW generating Cu Kα radiation. Measurements were taken with Bragg–Brentano Optics and a D/Tex Detector for 2-Theta measurements from 15° to 40°.
Contact angle measurements were performed using a VCA Optima by AST Products, Inc. (Billerica, MA, USA) employing the sessile drop technique. Triple-distilled water was employed as a probe liquid, of which at least three replicate measurements were made for each sample. 3D laser confocal microscopy was performed on an Olympus LEXT 3D measuring laser microscope OLS4000. Surface roughness measurements were performed employing an 80 μm cutoff wavelength (λc).

2.5. Contaminant Challenge

The prepared films were subjected to surface decontamination challenges against the chemical analytes presented in Figure 1, Demeton-S (1) and 2-chloroethyl phenyl sulfide (CEPS) (2), across a range of simulated environmental conditions. In general, a 2.0 μL micropipette was used to apply 1.0 μL of analyte to each sample (2 cm2) placed in a transparent Eppendorf tube. Each Eppendorf tube was then sealed and allowed to incubate for determined period of time in controlled conditions (darkness or simulated daylight). For photochemical reactions, a custom-built temperature controlled photochemical reactor equipped with five F8T5D fluorescent bulbs emitting broad spectrum visible light (Figure 2) at 10,000 lux intensity was employed, which simulates overcast daylight exposure. All contaminant challenges, including photochemical challenges, were performed at 20 °C. After which, residual analyte and degradation byproducts were extracted from polymer films with 1 mL of acetonitrile solution containing 12.1 mM tetrahydronaphthalene as an internal standard. Samples were then placed into a 1.5 mL GC auto-sample vial with PTFE septa top and analyzed immediately. In addition to simulant work being performed in a fume hood, personal protective equipment consisting of nitrile gloves, lab coat, chemical safety goggles were employed at all times during handling of chemical simulants.
Figure 1. (1) Demeton-S; (2) S-vinyl degradation product; (3) CEPS; and (4) vinyl phenyl sulfoxide.
Figure 1. (1) Demeton-S; (2) S-vinyl degradation product; (3) CEPS; and (4) vinyl phenyl sulfoxide.
Coatings 04 00614 g001
Figure 2. Emission spectrum of custom-built photochemical reactor.
Figure 2. Emission spectrum of custom-built photochemical reactor.
Coatings 04 00614 g002
Gas chromatography/mass spectroscopy (GC/MS) was employed to quantify analyte degradation. The GC/MS system consisted of an Agilent 7890A gas chromatograph equipped with an Agilent 5975C mass selective detector operating in electron ionization mode and an Agilent 7693A autoinjector. The column utilized was an Agilent HP-5MS (5% phenyl) methylpolysiloxane film. The carrier gas was helium with a flow rate of 1 mL·min−1. The injection volume was 1 μL with a split injection ratio of 20:1. The temperature program has an initial temperature of 100 °C for one minute, then 25 °C per min ramp to 130 °C followed by a 15 °C per min ramp to 250 °C with a one minute post run hold at 300 °C. The injection temperature, MS quad temperature, and source temperature were 300, 150 and 230 °C, respectively. The solvent delay was set at 1.5 min and detector was set to scan a mass range of 20 to 350 m/z. Prior to comparison, GC/MS results were normalized by dividing the analyte peak area by the peak area of the internal standard, tetrahydronaphthalene.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Additive–Polymer Compatibility

Additive–polymer compatibility and the effects of photoactive additive incorporation on Tecoflex film properties were investigated with a variety of methods. ATR-IR analysis was performed to investigate the effect of C60 incorporation on infrared signature and probe the chemical composition of the polymer film. ATR-IR analysis confirmed that the low loading concentrations employed in this study allowed the chemical signature of polymer film to be maintained despite increasing concentrations of C60 and EO3–C60.
Effects of additive incorporation on Tecoflex films on thermal stability were investigated with TGA. The incorporation of C60 and EO3–C60 into Tecoflex films each resulted in an increased thermal stability (Table 1). The incorporation of EO3–C60 in Tecoflex resulted in increased thermal stability (temperature at 10% loss) that scaled linearly with loading concentration. The increase in initial thermal stability suggests that stabilizing intermolecular interactions are occurring between EO3–C60 and Tecoflex polymer. Generally, the incorporation of C60 into Tecoflex demonstrated a moderate increase in thermal stability. A weak inverse relationship was observed with increased loading of C60 and thermal stability, as opposed to the direct relationship of EO3–C60 loading. This suggests that with increased loading concentration, additional C60 aggregates to other C60 instead of interacting with polymer matrix. Additionally, the lessened effect on thermal stability upon C60 incorporation compared to EO3–C60 indicates that EO3–C60 interacts more strongly than C60 with Tecoflex polymer matrix. The greater favorable interactions between EO3–C60 and Tecoflex results from compatibility between the ethylene oxide tail of EO3–C60 and the ether regions of the butane diol constituents of the Tecoflex monomer.
Table 1. Thermal properties of Tecoflex films.
Table 1. Thermal properties of Tecoflex films.
Tecoflex Film10% Loss (°C)Mass Remaining (%) *
Control300.550.2727
0.5% C60314.991.463
1.0% C60311.072.561
2.5% C60307.386.574
5.0% C60309.8611.25
0.25% EO3–C60312.610.6591
0.5% EO3–C60319.440.7918
1.0% EO3–C60325.631.513
* At 600 °C.
TGA analysis also indicated that incorporation of C60 into Tecoflex resulted in greater ultimate mass remaining than those loaded with EO3–C60. The alkoxy moiety of the EO3–C60 is susceptible to thermal degradation at a greater temperature than the fullerene cage of C60. Therefore, each comparable loading concentration of C60 (720 g/mol) and EO3–C60 (881 g/mol) contains a 1.22-fold molar excess of C60 to EO3–C60. Thus, the thermal degradation of the alkoxy tail of EO3–C60 below 600 °C results in only 82% remaining of the total loaded EO3–C60. Considering this, at 600 °C, there should be approximately a 1.5× excess remaining mass % of C60 relative to EO3–C60 at comparable loading concentrations. Indeed, such an excess was observed upon comparison of the 1 wt% loadings.
Interestingly, the ultimate wt% for each Tecoflex film containing additives was greater than the additive wt% loading concentration (Table 1). The amount of mass remaining from the thermal degradation of Tecoflex films containing C60 at 600 °C corresponded to approximately double the C60 loading concentration. This indicates one of two possibilities: a quantity of Tecoflex polymer is strongly adhered to the surface of C60 fullerene through intermolecular forces that require greater than 600 °C to dissociate or aggregation of C60 results in thermally stabilized Tecoflex polymer trapped within the aggregate. However, the lower thermal degradation onset temperature of Tecoflex films containing C60 rather than EO3–C60 revealed that intermolecular interactions were stronger for EO3–C60. The difference between the final mass remaining and loading concentration decreased with increased additive loading concentration of both C60 and EO3–C60, suggesting that with increased loading concentration, additional intermolecular C60 aggregation occurs instead of C60–polymer matrix interactions. The deviation was greater for C60 than it was for EO3–C60, indicating that aggregation is more prominent in C60 than EO3–C60.
DSC was performed on all Tecoflex films to investigate effects of additive incorporation on glass transition temperature (Tg). The way in which additive incorporation affects Tg can afford insight into intermolecular interactions between the additive and polymer. Increase in Tg resulting from additive incorporation indicates increased intermolecular interactions that limit polymer mobility [36]. Unmodified Tecoflex exhibits a glass transition that spans a broad temperature range. Incorporation of additives, both C60 and EO3–C60, result in minor and insignificant effects on Tg, thus indicating that the integrity of the coating was preserved.
For both neat C60 and Tecoflex films containing higher concentrations of C60, an endothermic transition was observed in the DSC thermograms at approximately −14 °C. The magnitude of the endothermic peak increases corresponding to C60 concentration (Figure 3). This endotherm corresponds to the phase transition of C60 crystals from simple cubic orientation ordering to face-centered cubic structure upon heating through the transition temperature [37,38]. The presence of this transition from Tecoflex films indicates a crystalline phase of C60 fullerene. C60 can only be in a crystalline phase when multiple fullerene molecules are in contact with one another, or aggregated, in a regular, repeated order. A polymeric film in which C60 fullerene was completely dispersed would not exhibit such crystalline phase transition. Furthermore, endotherm corresponding to the simple cubic to face-centered cubic phase transition was absent in the DSC analysis of neat EO3–C60 and the Tecoflex films containing EO3–C60. Therefore, aggregation, or at least the formation of crystallites, of C60 is inhibited by the covalent modification of C60 with ethylene oxide tails. Furthermore, the amphiphilic character of the EO3–C60 improves solubility of the additive in the Tecoflex solution and facilitates increased molecular dispersion of the additive throughout the polymer matrix.
Figure 3. Comparison of DSC thermograms for Tecoflex films containing C60 and neat C60.
Figure 3. Comparison of DSC thermograms for Tecoflex films containing C60 and neat C60.
Coatings 04 00614 g003
X-ray diffraction analysis (Figure 4) confirmed crystallinity observed via DSC. Diffraction peaks corresponding to the (220), (331), (222), and (420) peaks of crystallized C60 were observed in the Tecoflex films containing unmodified C60 additive. The intensity of diffraction peaks increased with increased loading of C60 from 0.5 to 5.0 wt%. In contrast, control Tecoflex and Tecoflex loaded with EO3–C60 displayed only a broad peak resulting from the amorphous polymer. Therefore, C60 aggregates into crystals in Tecoflex matrix, while EO3–C60 is well dispersed.
Figure 4. XRD patterns of Tecoflex films containing additives.
Figure 4. XRD patterns of Tecoflex films containing additives.
Coatings 04 00614 g004
Water contact angle measurements were performed on Tecoflex films containing C60 and EO3–C60, the results of which are shown in Figure 5. Addition of C60 in Tecoflex resulted in minor increases in water contact angle in loadings up to 2.5 wt% and ultimately a minor decrease at 5 wt% C60 loading. Correspondingly, the surface roughness of Tecoflex films increased with increased C60 loading. On the other hand, loading of EO3–C60 in Tecoflex resulted in a significant decrease in water contact angle accompanied with a linear increase surface roughness to a greater degree than C60. Therefore, comparison of contact angle and surface roughness indicates that surface roughness plays an insignificant role in the water contact angle, despite previous evidence to the contrary [39]. Thus the affect that additive loading has on water contact angle must result from the additive’s effect on the surface energy of Tecoflex, instead of imparted surface roughness.
Figure 5. Water contact angle (a) and surface roughness (b), Sq, of Tecoflex films loaded with C60 and EO3–C60.
Figure 5. Water contact angle (a) and surface roughness (b), Sq, of Tecoflex films loaded with C60 and EO3–C60.
Coatings 04 00614 g005
The covalent attachment of ethylene glycol moiety to C60 results in a molecule with amphiphilic character, i.e., a surfactant. When incorporated into a solution of hydrophobic Tecoflex, the amphiphilic EO3–C60 has the potential to orient its hydrophilic moiety at the polymer–air interface in order to minimize solvophobic interactions between hydrophilic ethylene oxide and hydrophobic Tecoflex matrix. Indeed, a linear decrease in contact angle was observed between 0.25 and 1.0 wt% loadings of EO3–C60. Considering that the highest loading (5%) of C60 in Tecoflex resulted in decrease in water contact angle of only 4°, the significant decrease in water contact angle (increase in hydrophilicity) of 10° at only 1 wt% loading of EO3–C60 indicates that the additive is concentrated at the surface of the polyurethane film.

3.2. Decontamination Challenges

Decontamination challenges were employed to investigate the capability imparted by photoactive additives C60 and EO3–C60 onto Tecoflex films to automatically decompose surface-residing contaminants. Two chemical compounds, Demeton-S and CEPS, were employed as representative contaminants of organophosphorous and sulfide-based pesticides. The prepared films were first subjected to decontamination challenges consisting of 18 h contaminant residence time.
Figure 6 presents results from a 4 g/m2 Demeton-S decontamination challenge in which extracted Demeton-S (normalized by the tetralin internal standard) is plotted against additive loading concentration. No correlation was observed between C60 loading concentration in Tecoflex films and Demeton-S reduction. Furthermore, reduction of Demeton-S on C60 exhibits similar trends in both dark and light conditions. Tecoflex films containing EO3–C60 exhibit increased reduction of Demeton-S compared to films containing C60 in dark conditions; however, decomposition of Demeton-S did not directly correlate with additive loading. Tecoflex films exposed to light that contained EO3–C60 exhibit direct correlation between reduction of Demeton-S and EO3–C60 loading concentration. From this, it is proposed that different modes of action for Demeton-S degradation are occurring between Tecoflex films containing C60 and EO3–C60, thus necessitating decomposition byproducts analysis.
Figure 6. Demeton-S recovered from Tecoflex films after 18 h residence in dark (a) and daylight (b) conditions.
Figure 6. Demeton-S recovered from Tecoflex films after 18 h residence in dark (a) and daylight (b) conditions.
Coatings 04 00614 g006
Byproduct analysis of the 18 h Demeton-S decontamination challenges were performed for further insight into possible modes of action. In addition to reduction in Demeton-S, significant byproducts were detected at a retention time of 4.1 min which corresponds to vinyl oxidation product (S-vinyl) (2). Byproduct concentration, normalized with the internal standard, is plotted against loading concentration in Figure 7. It is apparent that increased C60 loading leads to decreased production of 2 in both dark and light conditions, whereas increasing concentration of EO3–C60 loading results in increasing production of 2. Unmodified C60 is more reactive than EO3–C60, especially at low concentrations; however, increased concentration of C60 does not result in increased decomposition, most likely due to self-quenching resulting from high C60 proximity from aggregation in the polymer matrix. Qualitative observation indicated that poor solubility of C60 in chloroform facilitates the formation of C60 aggregates, in which the probability of self-quenching between C60 molecules is increased.
For Tecoflex films containing C60, comparable amounts of 2 were detected from decomposition of Demeton-S on films that resided in dark and light conditions for 18 h (Figure 7a). From this, it appears that photoactivity against Demeton-S is not occurring in the Tecoflex films containing unmodified C60. If photoactivity was occurring, then a greater amount of 2 would be observed on the films exposed to light than in darkness. It has been previously demonstrated that C60 fullerene can behave as an electron acceptor (Lewis acid) toward sulfides [40]. Thus, the electron acceptor behavior of C60 in Tecoflex may facilitate the cleavage of the S–C bond (Figure 8) resulting in the elimination product 2.
Figure 7. Detected S-vinyl product (shown as normalized ratio of S-vinyl peak area to tetralin peak area) from Tecoflex films loaded with C60 (a) and EO3–C60 (b) over an 18 h Demeton-S challenge.
Figure 7. Detected S-vinyl product (shown as normalized ratio of S-vinyl peak area to tetralin peak area) from Tecoflex films loaded with C60 (a) and EO3–C60 (b) over an 18 h Demeton-S challenge.
Coatings 04 00614 g007
Figure 8. Hypothesized Lewis acid catalyzed sulfide elimination.
Figure 8. Hypothesized Lewis acid catalyzed sulfide elimination.
Coatings 04 00614 g008
On the other hand, photoactivity was apparent from byproduct analysis in the films loaded with EO3–C60 (Figure 7b). In fact, the photoactivity of EO3–C60 continued to increase with increasing concentration indicating that the ethylene oxide moieties, by improving solubility, help to diminish aggregate facilitated self-quenching. In contrast to the films containing C60, an absence of Demeton-S decomposition on Tecoflex films containing EO3–C60 in dark conditions was observed. This is likely the result of decreased Lewis acid character upon the covalent attachment of the ethylene oxide moiety.
The combination of photoactivity and oxidation products detected from Tecoflex films containing EO3–C60, and documented capability of fullerene species to photogenerate singlet oxygen [41] has led to the proposed mode of action for Demeton-S decomposition on films containing EO3–C60 exposed to visible light presented in Figure 9. The photoactive species embedded in the polymer matrix is first photosensitized upon the absorption of visible light. Subsequent transfer of energy from photosensitized EO3–C60 to ambient atmospheric oxygen results in the formation of singlet oxygen (1O2). The photogenerated singlet oxygen, a ROS, then oxidizes the peripheral sulfur of Demeton-S that is residing on the coating surface in proximity to the photosensitized additive. The sulfoxide then undergoes α elimination resulting in the Demeton-S vinyl degradation product (2) and unstable sulfenic acid, which quickly self-condenses to form the corresponding thiosulfanate.
In addition to decontamination challenges against Demeton-S, Tecoflex films loaded with photoactives were also subjected to CEPS decontamination challenges. An 18 h decontamination challenge was initially performed for each sample in both dark and light conditions. Despite minor differences in the amount of CEPS decomposed, significant differences in byproduct formation were observed to be dependent on the conditions in which the sample resided.
Figure 9. Proposed oxidation mechanism of Demeton-S and the formation of elimination product from photogenerated singlet oxygen.
Figure 9. Proposed oxidation mechanism of Demeton-S and the formation of elimination product from photogenerated singlet oxygen.
Coatings 04 00614 g009
GC-MS analysis afforded the detection of a notable degradation product of CEPS from the Tecoflex films containing photoactives that resided in daylight conditions. Mass spectra analysis determined that the degradation product was vinyl phenyl sulfoxide (4), an oxidation byproduct of CEPS (Figure 1). Furthermore, 4 was not detected from coatings that resided in dark conditions. Figure 10 presents normalized concentrations of 4 detected in the reaction extract from Tecoflex films loaded with C60 and EO3–C60 after an 18 h residence time of CEPS. Production of 4 from Tecoflex films decreases with increasing C60 loading concentration. This is attributed to increasing C60 aggregation with increased C60 loading concentration due to poor solubility and incompatibility with the polyurethane matrix, as previously demonstrated via DSC and XRD. The increase in aggregation effectively limits the available surface area of C60 available for both singlet oxygen generation and contact with the contaminant. Additionally, singlet oxygen quenching is known to occur between proximal C60 molecules in high concentration, such as in aggregates and crystallites [42].
In contrast to the effects observed resulting from C60 loading concentration, the generation of 4 increased with increasing EO3–C60 concentration in Tecoflex from 0.25 to 1.0 wt%. This direct correlation of EO3–C60 loading and generation of 4 can only result from minimized self-quenching due to good dispersion of EO3–C60. These trends support those that were observed in the Demeton-S decontamination challenge.
Figure 10. CEPS byproduct resulting from residence on Tecoflex films of several additive concentrations following exposure to daylight conditions for 18 h.
Figure 10. CEPS byproduct resulting from residence on Tecoflex films of several additive concentrations following exposure to daylight conditions for 18 h.
Coatings 04 00614 g010
From the above 18 h study, 1 wt% loadings of C60 and EO3–C60 were down-selected for an expanded time-dependent CEPS decontamination challenge over the course of 165 h in daylight conditions (Figure 11). Figure 11a displays concentration of CEPS extracted from samples over a 165 h residence time period. Each of the films subjected to the challenge exhibited rapid decrease in CEPS concentration over the first 48 h. This is attributed to inherent attenuation of CEPS as this behavior was observed on the two controls, a Teflon film and unmodified Tecoflex. C60 and EO3–C60 films differentiate from the controls at time points beyond 48 h, after which the degradation rates of CEPS on the controls decrease drastically. In contrast, the C60 and EO3–C60 Tecoflex films exhibit continued linear degradation of CEPS beyond 48 h. This behavior is explained by two separate degradation mechanisms occurring simultaneously. First, the attenuation mechanism, which is initially at a high rate, dominates the first 48 h of degradation. Beyond 48 h, attenuation rate slows to an extent such that the secondary mechanism, photo-oxidation, dominates the overall reaction rate and thus becomes apparent.
Byproduct analysis (Figure 11b) confirms linear increase of oxidation product (4) over time on films containing photoactive additives. Tecoflex films containing C60 and EO3–C60 each exhibited a linear relationship between production of oxidation product and residence time, while oxidation was not detected from the controls. The detection of oxidation products only from samples that are exposed to light, that contain either C60 or EO3–C60, and dependent on the concentration of C60 and EO3–C60 indicates that a photo-mediated oxidation process is facilitating the oxidation of CEPS.
In consideration of the data presented herein and the known singlet oxygen generation potential of C60 fullerene, a proposed mode of action for CEPS oxidation is presented in Figure 12. Similar to the mechanism proposed for the oxidation of Demeton-S, the photoactive in Tecoflex generates singlet oxygen upon exposure to light. Singlet oxygen oxidizes the S atom to sulfoxide, which then through an elimination mechanism produces a vinyl sulfoxide with HCl as a byproduct. In contrast to the mechanism proposed for Demeton-S, the oxygen remains on the same byproduct molecule as sulfur. This is due to the stability of the sulfenic acid leaving group in Demeton-S decomposition compared to the instability of the potential hypochlorite byproduct in CEPS oxidation.
Figure 11. Concentration of CEPS recovered from samples over a 165 h residence (a) and normalized vinyl phenyl sulfoxide degradation product (b).
Figure 11. Concentration of CEPS recovered from samples over a 165 h residence (a) and normalized vinyl phenyl sulfoxide degradation product (b).
Coatings 04 00614 g011
Figure 12. Potential pathway of sulfide oxidation followed by dehydrohalogenation of CEPS.
Figure 12. Potential pathway of sulfide oxidation followed by dehydrohalogenation of CEPS.
Coatings 04 00614 g012

4. Conclusions

Several insights were gained upon the incorporation of C60 and EO3–C60 into Tecoflex films. The detection of the phase transition from simple cubic to face-centered cubic structure at approximately −14 °C, subsequent confirmation with XRD, and the decreased reactivity against simulants at increased C60 loading concentrations provide evidence of C60 aggregation in Tecoflex films. Conversely, no such evidence was observed to indicate that EO3–C60 was aggregating in Tecoflex films. Therefore, the covalent attachment of ethylene glycol tail to C60 results in an additive that exhibits improved solubility and dispersion in the hydrophobic polyurethane matrix of Tecoflex.
Surface decontamination challenges demonstrated the self-cleaning capability of Tecoflex films containing C60 and EO3–C60 additives. Decomposition products resulting from oxidation were observed in addition to a direct correlation between additive loading concentration and decomposition of surface-residing contaminants. Through correlation of trends observed from Demeton-S and CEPS decontamination challenges and byproduct analysis, modes of action were proposed for the decomposition pathways of both contaminants on the surface of polyurethane films.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the Office of Naval Research (ONR) and the Naval Research Laboratory.

Author Contributions

Jeffrey G. Lundin prepared polymer films, acquired and analyzed various data, and composed the manuscript. Spencer L. Giles performed XRD data acquisition and analysis. Robert F. Cozzens assisted in interpretation of degradation reactions. James H. Wynne assisted in manuscript revision and project management.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bartelt-Hunt, S.L.; Knappe, D.R.U.; Barlaz, M.A. A review of chemical warfare agent simulants for the study of environmental behavior. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 38, 112–136. [Google Scholar]
  2. Gephart, R.T.; Coneski, P.N.; Wynne, J.H. Decontamination of chemical-warfare agent simulants by polymer surfaces doped with the singlet oxygen generator zinc octaphenoxyphthalocyanine. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 10191–10200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chattopadhyay, D.K.; Raju, K.V.S.N. Structural engineering of polyurethane coatings for high performance applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2007, 32, 352–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wynne, J.H.; Pant, R.R.; Jones-Meehan, J.M.; Phillips, J.P. Preparation and evaluation of nonionic amphiphilic phenolic biocides in urethane hydrogels. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2008, 107, 2089–2094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pant, R.R.; Buckley, J.L.; Fulmer, P.A.; Wynne, J.H.; McCluskey, D.M.; Phillips, J.P. Hybrid siloxane epoxy coatings containing quaternary ammonium moieties. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2008, 110, 3080–3086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kurt, P.; Wood, L.; Ohman, D.E.; Wynne, K.J. Highly effective contact antimicrobial surfaces via polymer surface modifiers. Langmuir 2007, 23, 4719–4723. [Google Scholar]
  7. Harney, M.B.; Pant, R.R.; Fulmer, P.A.; Wynne, J.H. Surface self-concentrating amphiphilic quaternary ammonium biocides as coating additives. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2009, 1, 39–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pant, R.R.; Fulmer, P.A.; Harney, M.B.; Buckley, J.P.; Wynne, J.H. Synthesis and biocidal efficacy of self-spreading polydimethylsiloxane oligomers possessing oxyethylene-functionalized quaternary ammoniums. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2009, 113, 2397–2403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pant, R.R.; Rasley, B.T.; Buckley, J.P.; Lloyd, C.T.; Cozzens, R.F.; Santangelo, P.G.; Wynne, J.H. Synthesis, mobility study and antimicrobial evaluation or novel self-spreading ionic silicone oligomers. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2007, 104, 2954–2964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fulmer, P.A.; Lundin, J.G.; Wynne, J.H. Development of antimicrobial peptides (amps) for use in self-decontaminating coatings. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2010, 2, 1266–1270. [Google Scholar]
  11. Talmage, S.S.; Watson, A.P.; Hauschild, V.; Munro, N.B.; King, J. Chemical warfare agent degradation and decontamination. Curr. Org. Chem. 2007, 11, 285–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Arbogast, J.W.; Darmanyan, A.P.; Foote, C.S.; Diederich, F.N.; Whetten, R.L.; Rubin, Y.; Alvarez, M.M.; Anz, S.J. Photophysical properties of sixty atom carbon molecule (C60). J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 11–12. [Google Scholar]
  13. Nagano, T.; Arakane, K.; Ryu, A.; Masunaga, T.; Shinmoto, K.; Mashiko, S.; Hirobe, M. Comparison of singlet oxygen production efficiency of C60 with other photosensitizers, based on 1268 nm emission. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1994, 42, 2291–2294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pichler, K.; Graham, S.; Gelsen, O.M.; Friend, R.H.; Romanow, W.J.; McCauley, J.P., Jr.; Coustel, N.; Fischer, J.E.; Smith, A.B. Photophysical properties of solid films of fullerene, C60. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 1991, 3, 9259–9270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wasielewski, M.R.; O’Neil, M.P.; Lykke, K.R.; Pellin, M.J.; Gruen, D.M. Triplet states of fullerenes C60 and C70. Electron paramagnetic resonance spectra, photophysics, and electronic structures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 2774–2776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hotze, E.M.; Labille, J.; Alvarez, P.; Wiesner, M.R. Mechanisms of photochemistry and reactive oxygen production by fullerene suspensions in water. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 4175–4180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Haufler, R.E.; Wang, L.-S.; Chibante, L.P.F.; Jin, C.; Conceicao, J.; Chai, Y.; Smalley, R.E. Fullerene triplet state production and decay: R2PI probes of C60 and C70 in a supersonic beam. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1991, 179, 449–454. [Google Scholar]
  18. Fraelich, M.R.; Weisman, R.B. Triplet states of fullerene C60 and C70 in solution: Long intrinsic lifetimes and energy pooling. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 11145–11147. [Google Scholar]
  19. Orfanopoulos, M.; Kambourakis, S. Chemical evidence of singlet oxygen production from C60 and C70 in aqueous and other polar media. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 435–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lee, J.; Fortner, J.D.; Hughes, J.B.; Kim, J.-H. Photochemical production of reactive oxygen species by C60 in the aqueous phase during uv irradiation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 2529–2535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lee, J.; Mackeyev, Y.; Cho, M.; Li, D.; Kim, J.-H.; Wilson, L.J.; Alvarez, P.J.J. Photochemical and antimicrobial properties of novel C60 derivatives in aqueous systems. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 6604–6610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lee, J.; Yamakoshi, Y.; Hughes, J.B.; Kim, J.-H. Mechanism of C60 photoreactivity in water: Fate of triplet state and radical anion and production of reactive oxygen species. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 3459–3464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Deguchi, S.; Alargova, R.G.; Tsujii, K. Stable dispersions of fullerenes, C60 and C70, in water. Preparation and characterization. Langmuir 2001, 17, 6013–6017. [Google Scholar]
  24. Lyon, D.Y.; Adams, L.K.; Falkner, J.C.; Alvarez, P.J.J. Antibacterial activity of fullerene water suspensions: Effects of preparation method and particle size. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 4360–4366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wilson, M. Light-activated antimicrobial coating for the continuous disinfection of surfaces. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2003, 24, 782–784. [Google Scholar]
  26. Page, K.; Wilson, M.; Parkin, I.P. Antimicrobial surfaces and their potential in reducing the role of the inanimate environment in the incidence of hospital-acquired infections. J. Mater. Chem. 2009, 19, 3818–3831. [Google Scholar]
  27. Perni, S.; Piccirillo, C.; Pratten, J.; Prokopovich, P.; Chrzanowski, W.; Parkin, I.P.; Wilson, M. The antimicrobial properties of light-activated polymers containing methylene blue and gold nanoparticles. Biomaterials 2009, 30, 89–93. [Google Scholar]
  28. Belousova, I.M.; Danilov, O.B.; Muraveva, T.D.; Kiselyakov, I.M.; Rylkov, V.V.; Krisko, T.K.; Kiselev, O.I.; Zarubaev, V.V.; Sirotkin, A.K.; Piotrovskii, L.B. Solid-phase photosensitizers based on fullerene C60 for photodynamic inactivation of viruses in biological liquids. J. Opt. Technol. 2009, 76, 243–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. McCluskey, D.M.; Smith, T.N.; Madasu, P.K.; Coumbe, C.E.; Mackey, M.A.; Fulmer, P.A.; Wynne, J.H.; Stevenson, S.; Phillips, J.P. Evidence for singlet-oxygen generation and biocidal activity in photoresponsive metallic nitride fullerene-polymer adhesive films. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2009, 1, 882–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Vandewal, K.; Albrecht, S.; Hoke, E.T.; Graham, K.R.; Widmer, J.; Douglas, J.D.; Schubert, M.; Mateker, W.R.; Bloking, J.T.; Burkhard, G.F.; et al. Efficient charge generation by relaxed charge-transfer states at organic interfaces. Nat. Mater. 2014, 13, 63–68. [Google Scholar]
  31. Badamshina, E.; Estrin, Y.; Gafurova, M. Nanocomposites based on polyurethanes and carbon nanoparticles: Preparation, properties and application. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 6509–6529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Giacalone, F.; Martín, N. Fullerene polymers: Synthesis and properties. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 5136–5190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Accorsi, G.; Armaroli, N. Taking advantage of the electronic excited states of [60]-fullerenes. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 1385–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Badamshina, E.; Gafurova, M. Polymeric nanocomposites containing non-covalently bonded fullerene C60: Properties and applications. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 9427–9438. [Google Scholar]
  35. Hawker, C.J.; Saville, P.M.; White, J.W. The synthesis and characterization of a self-assembling amphiphilic fullerene. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 3503–3505. [Google Scholar]
  36. Teh, S.-L.; Linton, D.; Sumpter, B.; Dadmun, M.D. Controlling non-covalent interactions to modulate the dispersion of fullerenes in polymer nanocomposites. Macromolecules 2011, 44, 7737–7745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sachidanandam, R.; Harris, A.B. Comment on “orientational ordering transition in solid C60”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1991, 67, 1467–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Heiney, P.A.; Fischer, J.E.; McGhie, A.R.; Romanow, W.J.; Denenstein, A.M.; McCauley, J.P., Jr.; Smith, A.B.; Cox, D.E. Orientational ordering transition in solid C60. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1991, 66, 2911–2914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bellanger, H.; Darmanin, T.; Taffin de Givenchy, E.; Guittard, F. Chemical and physical pathways for the preparation of superoleophobic surfaces and related wetting theories. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 2694–2716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhang, J.Z.; Geselbracht, M.J.; Ellis, A.B. Binding of fullerenes to cadmium sulfide and cadmium selenide surfaces, photoluminescence as a probe of strong, lewis acidity-driven, surface adduct formation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 7789–7793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Phillips, J.P.; Deng, X.; Todd, M.L.; Heaps, D.T.; Stevenson, S.; Zhou, H.; Hoyle, C.E. Singlet oxygen generation and adhesive loss in stimuli-responsive, fullerene-polymer blends, containing polystyrene-block-polybutadiene-block-polystyrene and polystyrene-block-polyisoprene-block-polystyrene rubber-based adhesives. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2008, 109, 2895–2904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bagrov, I.; Belousova, I.; Danilov, O.; Kiselev, V.; Murav’eva, T.; Sosnov, E. Photoinduced quenching of the luminescence of singlet oxygen in fullerene solutions. Opt. Spectrosc. 2007, 102, 52–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lundin, J.G.; Giles, S.L.; Cozzens, R.F.; Wynne, J.H. Self-Cleaning Photocatalytic Polyurethane Coatings Containing Modified C60 Fullerene Additives. Coatings 2014, 4, 614-629. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings4030614

AMA Style

Lundin JG, Giles SL, Cozzens RF, Wynne JH. Self-Cleaning Photocatalytic Polyurethane Coatings Containing Modified C60 Fullerene Additives. Coatings. 2014; 4(3):614-629. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings4030614

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lundin, Jeffrey G., Spencer L. Giles, Robert F. Cozzens, and James H. Wynne. 2014. "Self-Cleaning Photocatalytic Polyurethane Coatings Containing Modified C60 Fullerene Additives" Coatings 4, no. 3: 614-629. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings4030614

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop