Improving Transactional Data System Based on an Edge Computing–Blockchain–Machine Learning Integrated Framework
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Edge Computing
1.2. Blockchain
1.3. Internet of Things, Industrial Internet of Things, Industry 4.0, and Cyber-Physical Systems
- Investigating the multi-access edge computing potential problems, blockchain, and machine learning in the smart manufacturing system.
- The proposed approach’s conceptual scenario is the integration of multi-access edge computing, blockchain, and machine learning.
- The multi-access edge computing changed the smart manufacturing architecture from centralized management to decentralized style.
- Addressing the terminal device’s task assignment issue.
- Representing the allocation issue between the edge servers.
- Providing an optimization process by applying the swarm intelligence to the presented smart manufacturing system.
- The main objectives of applying machine learning in this system are reducing the manufacturing environment’s predicted values and improving the productivity rate.
- Securing the information of stored data in blocks based on blockchain technology.
- Improving the productivity and cost reduction using blockchain technology.
2. System Architecture of the Proposed Smart Manufacturing Environment
2.1. Prototype System Based on Edge Computing
2.2. Service Validation Based on Blockchain
2.3. Machine Learning-Based Smart Manufacturing
2.4. Fault Assessment Diagnostic Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Implementation Environment
3.2. Dataset Management
3.3. Optimization
Swarm Intelligence
3.4. Performance Evaluation
3.5. Challenges and Opportunities of the Smart Manufacturing System
- Data offloading and load balancing: The IIoT system having various devices, which are important in data offloading among the large servers and devices. The IIoT system, based on edge computing, reflecting on data processing, increases this process’s difficulty.
- Edge intelligence: In a recent IIoT system designed based on edge computing, the devices could only accomplish the light-weight tasks. To make the system intelligent, edge intelligence (EI) must be applied to the process.
- Data sharing security: One of the IIoT system’s advantages is the huge amount of data in real-time devices, websites, etc., which is efficient to improve industrial production.
4. Conclusions and Future Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Tao, F.; Qi, Q.; Liu, A.; Kusiak, A. Data-driven smart manufacturing. J. Manuf. Syst. 2018, 48, 157–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, J.; Chen, W.; Tao, F.; Lin, C.L. Industrial IoT in 5G environment towards smart manufacturing. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 2018, 10, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, L.; Luo, J.; Luo, H. Tasks scheduling and resource allocation in fog computing based on containers for smart manufacturing. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2018, 14, 4712–4721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Li, D.; Wan, J.; Liu, C.; Imran, M. Adaptive transmission optimization in SDN-based industrial Internet of Things with edge computing. IEEE Internet Things J. 2018, 5, 1351–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suganuma, T.; Oide, T.; Kitagami, S.; Sugawara, K.; Shiratori, N. Multiagent-based flexible edge computing architecture for IoT. IEEE Netw. 2018, 32, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, B.; Zhu, F.; Zhang, J.; Chen, J.; Chen, X.; Xiong, N.N.; Mauri, J.L. A time-driven data placement strategy for a scientific workflow combining edge computing and cloud computing. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2019, 15, 4254–4265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Reznik, A.; Arora, R.; Cannon, M.; Cominardi, L.; Featherstone, W.; Frazao, R.; Giust, F.; Kekki, S.; Li, A.; Sabella, D.; et al. Developing software for multi-access edge computing. ETSI White Pap. 2017, 20. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, C.H.; Lin, M.Y.; Liu, C.C. Edge computing gateway of the industrial internet of things using multiple collaborative microcontrollers. IEEE Netw. 2018, 32, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, P.W.; Byun, Y.C.; Park, N. A Data Verification System for CCTV Surveillance Cameras Using Blockchain Technology in Smart Cities. Electronics 2020, 9, 484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yu, W.; Liang, F.; He, X.; Hatcher, W.G.; Lu, C.; Lin, J.; Yang, X. A survey on the edge computing for the Internet of Things. IEEE Access 2017, 6, 6900–6919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Porambage, P.; Okwuibe, J.; Liyanage, M.; Ylianttila, M.; Taleb, T. Survey on multi-access edge computing for internet of things realization. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2018, 20, 2961–2991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wang, S.; Ouyang, L.; Yuan, Y.; Ni, X.; Han, X.; Wang, F.Y. Blockchain-enabled smart contracts: Architecture, applications, and future trends. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. 2019, 49, 2266–2277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, P.W.; Byun, Y.C.; Park, N. IoT-Blockchain Enabled Optimized Provenance System for Food Industry 4.0 Using Advanced Deep Learning. Sensors 2020, 20, 2990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khan, P.W.; Byun, Y. Secure Transactions Management Using Blockchain as a Service Software for the Internet of Things. In Software Engineering in IoT, Big Data, Cloud and Mobile Computing. Studies in Computational Intelligence; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 117–128. [Google Scholar]
- Jamil, F.; Hang, L.; Kim, K.; Kim, D. A novel medical blockchain model for drug supply chain integrity management in a smart hospital. Electronics 2019, 8, 505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Khan, P.W.; Byun, Y. A Blockchain-Based Secure Image Encryption Scheme for the Industrial Internet of Things. Entropy 2020, 22, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jamil, F.; Iqbal, M.A.; Amin, R.; Kim, D. Adaptive thermal-aware routing protocol for wireless body area network. Electronics 2019, 8, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jamil, F.; Ahmad, S.; Iqbal, N.; Kim, D.H. Towards a Remote Monitoring of Patient Vital Signs Based on IoT-Based Blockchain Integrity Management Platforms in Smart Hospitals. Sensors 2020, 20, 2195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jamil, F.; Kim, D.H. Improving Accuracy of the Alpha–Beta Filter Algorithm Using an ANN-Based Learning Mechanism in Indoor Navigation System. Sensors 2019, 19, 3946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jamil, F.; Iqbal, N.; Ahmad, S.; Kim, D.H. Toward Accurate Position Estimation Using Learning to Prediction Algorithm in Indoor Navigation. Sensors 2020, 20, 4410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, S.; Jamil, F.; Khudoyberdiev, A.; Kim, D. Accident risk prediction and avoidance in intelligent semi-autonomous vehicles based on road safety data and driver biological behaviours. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 2020, 38, 4591–4601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jamil, F.; Kim, D. Payment Mechanism for Electronic Charging using Blockchain in Smart Vehicle. Korea 2019, 30, 31. [Google Scholar]
- Shahbazi, Z.; Byun, Y.C. Towards a Secure Thermal-Energy Aware Routing Protocol in Wireless Body Area Network Based on Blockchain Technology. Sensors 2020, 20, 3604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shahbazi, Z.; Jamil, F.; Byun, Y. Topic modeling in short-text using non-negative matrix factorization based on deep reinforcement learning. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 2020, 39, 753–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahbazi, Z.; Hazra, D.; Park, S.; Byun, Y.C. Toward Improving the Prediction Accuracy of Product Recommendation System Using Extreme Gradient Boosting and Encoding Approaches. Symmetry 2020, 12, 1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahbazi, Z.; Byun, Y.C. Product Recommendation Based on Content-based Filtering Using XGBoost Classifier. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Technol. 2019, 29, 6979–6988. [Google Scholar]
- Shahbazi, Z.; Byun, Y.C. Toward Social Media Content Recommendation Integrated with Data Science and Machine Learning Approach for E-Learners. Symmetry 2020, 12, 1798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahbazi, Z.; Byun, Y.C. Analysis of Domain-Independent Unsupervised Text Segmentation Using LDA Topic Modeling over Social Media Contents. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Technol. 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Shahbazi, Z.; Byun, Y.C.; Lee, D.C. Toward Representing Automatic Knowledge Discovery from Social Media Contents Based on Document Classification. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Technol. 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Yuan, Y.; Wang, F.Y. Blockchain: The state of the art and future trends. Acta Autom. Sin. 2016, 42, 481–494. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Z.; Kang, J.; Yu, R.; Ye, D.; Deng, Q.; Zhang, Y. Consortium blockchain for secure energy trading in industrial internet of things. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2017, 14, 3690–3700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Min, H. Blockchain technology for enhancing supply chain resilience. Bus. Horiz. 2019, 62, 35–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, J.; Lu, Z.; Wu, J. Smart-toy-edge-computing-oriented data exchange based on blockchain. J. Syst. Archit. 2018, 87, 36–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, C.; Zhang, S.; Ng, K. Development of an industrial Internet of things suite for smart factory towards re-industrialization. Adv. Manuf. 2017, 5, 335–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, C.; Shen, W.; Wang, X. The internet of things in manufacturing: Key issues and potential applications. IEEE Syst. Man Cybern. Mag. 2018, 4, 6–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wan, J.; Chen, B.; Imran, M.; Tao, F.; Li, D.; Liu, C.; Ahmad, S. Toward dynamic resources management for IoT-based manufacturing. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2018, 56, 52–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Xu, P.; Ren, L. Sequence synopsis: Optimize visual summary of temporal event data. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2017, 24, 45–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, F.; Lin, X.; Luo, X.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, Y.; Chen, N.; Gui, W. Visually enhanced situation awareness for complex manufacturing facility monitoring in smart factories. J. Vis. Lang. Comput. 2018, 44, 58–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dutta, S.; Shen, H.W.; Chen, J.P. In situ prediction driven feature analysis in jet engine simulations. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis), Kobe, Japan, 10–13 April 2018; pp. 66–75. [Google Scholar]
- Weissenböck, J.; Amirkhanov, A.; Li, W.; Reh, A.; Amirkhanov, A.; Gröller, E.; Kastner, J.; Heinzl, C. Fiberscout: An interactive tool for exploring and analyzing fiber reinforced polymers. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium, Yokohama, Japan, 4–7 March 2014; pp. 153–160. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, Y.; Du, X.; Yuan, X. Ordered small multiple treemaps for visualizing time-varying hierarchical pesticide residue data. Vis. Comput. 2017, 33, 1073–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amirkhanov, A.; Fröhler, B.; Kastner, J.; Gröller, E.; Heinzl, C. InSpectr: Multi-Modal Exploration, Visualization, and Analysis of Spectral Data. Comput. Graph. Forum 2014, 33, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, C.Q.; Lopez, P.R.; Moreland, J.; Wu, B. Visualizing the future in steel manufacturing. Iron Steel Technol. 2011, 8, 37–50. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, W.; Zheng, Y.; Chen, K.; Wang, X.; Cao, N. A visual analytics approach for equipment condition monitoring in smart factories of process industry. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis), Kobe, Japan, 10–13 April 2018; pp. 140–149. [Google Scholar]
- Coffey, D.; Lin, C.L.; Erdman, A.G.; Keefe, D.F. Design by dragging: An interface for creative forward and inverse design with simulation ensembles. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2013, 19, 2783–2791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Millette, A.; McGuffin, M.J. DualCAD: Integrating augmented reality with a desktop GUI and smartphone interaction. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR-Adjunct), Merida, Mexico, 19–23 September 2016; pp. 21–26. [Google Scholar]
- Biswal, A.K.; Maiti, P.; Bebarta, S.; Sahoo, B.; Turuk, A.K. Authenticating IoT Devices with Blockchain. In Advanced Applications of Blockchain Technology; Springer: Warsaw, Poland, 2020; pp. 177–205. [Google Scholar]
- Giordani, M.; Polese, M.; Mezzavilla, M.; Rangan, S.; Zorzi, M. Toward 6g networks: Use cases and technologies. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2020, 58, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jesus, E.F.; Chicarino, V.R.; de Albuquerque, C.V.; Rocha, A.A.D.A. A survey of how to use blockchain to secure internet of things and the stalker attack. Secur. Commun. Netw. 2018, 2018, 9675050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Qu, C.; Tao, M.; Zhang, J.; Hong, X.; Yuan, R. Blockchain based credibility verification method for IoT entities. Secur. Commun. Netw. 2018, 2018, 7817614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, B.G.; Jeong, E.; Kim, S.W. Multiple Security Certification System between Blockchain Based Terminal and Internet of Things Device: Implication for Open Innovation. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2019, 5, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dai, Y.; Xu, D.; Maharjan, S.; Chen, Z.; He, Q.; Zhang, Y. Blockchain and deep reinforcement learning empowered intelligent 5G beyond. IEEE Netw. 2019, 33, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maroufi, M.; Abdolee, R.; Tazekand, B.M. On the convergence of blockchain and Internet of Things (IoT) technologies. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1904.01936. [Google Scholar]
- Panarello, A.; Tapas, N.; Merlino, G.; Longo, F.; Puliafito, A. Blockchain and iot integration: A systematic survey. Sensors 2018, 18, 2575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hang, L.; Kim, D.H. Design and implementation of an integrated iot blockchain platform for sensing data integrity. Sensors 2019, 19, 2228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mistry, I.; Tanwar, S.; Tyagi, S.; Kumar, N. Blockchain for 5G-enabled IoT for industrial automation: A systematic review, solutions, and challenges. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2020, 135, 106382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taleb, T.; Samdanis, K.; Mada, B.; Flinck, H.; Dutta, S.; Sabella, D. On multi-access edge computing: A survey of the emerging 5G network edge cloud architecture and orchestration. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2017, 19, 1657–1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Li, Z.; Barenji, A.V.; Huang, G.Q. Toward a blockchain cloud manufacturing system as a peer to peer distributed network platform. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 2018, 54, 133–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Helu, M.; Libes, D.; Lubell, J.; Lyons, K.; Morris, K.C. Enabling smart manufacturing technologies for decision-making support. In Proceedings of the International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Charlotte, NC, USA, 21–24 August 2016; Volume 50084, p. V01BT02A035. [Google Scholar]
- Wuest, T.; Weimer, D.; Irgens, C.; Thoben, K.D. Machine learning in manufacturing: Advantages, challenges, and applications. Prod. Manuf. Res. 2016, 4, 23–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Park, J.K.; Kwon, B.K.; Park, J.H.; Kang, D.J. Machine learning-based imaging system for surface defect inspection. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. Green Technol. 2016, 3, 303–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, R.; Yan, R.; Chen, Z.; Mao, K.; Wang, P.; Gao, R.X. Deep learning and its applications to machine health monitoring: A survey. arXiv 2016, arXiv:1612.07640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, H.; Yang, L.; Li, H. Small fault diagnosis of front-end speed controlled wind generator based on deep learning. WSEAS Trans. Circuits Syst. 2016, 15, 64. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, J.; Zhuang, J.; Duan, L.; Cheng, W. A multi-scale convolution neural network for featureless fault diagnosis. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Symposium on Flexible Automation (ISFA), Cleveland, OH, USA, 1–3 August 2016; pp. 65–70. [Google Scholar]
- Janssens, O.; Slavkovikj, V.; Vervisch, B.; Stockman, K.; Loccufier, M.; Verstockt, S.; Van de Walle, R.; Van Hoecke, S. Convolutional neural network based fault detection for rotating machinery. J. Sound Vib. 2016, 377, 331–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, C.; Wang, Z.; Zhou, B. Intelligent fault diagnosis of rolling bearing using hierarchical convolutional network based health state classification. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2017, 32, 139–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, X.; Chen, L.; Shen, C. Hierarchical adaptive deep convolution neural network and its application to bearing fault diagnosis. Measurement 2016, 93, 490–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verstraete, D.; Ferrada, A.; Droguett, E.L.; Meruane, V.; Modarres, M. Deep learning enabled fault diagnosis using time-frequency image analysis of rolling element bearings. Shock Vib. 2017, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blum, C.; Merkle, D. Swarm intelligence. In Swarm Intelligence in Optimization; Blum, C., Merkle, D., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008; pp. 43–85. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, S.; Lee, C.K.; Chan, H.K.; Choy, K.L.; Wu, Z. Swarm intelligence applied in green logistics: A literature review. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2015, 37, 154–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
# | Authors | Industry Sectors | Internal Equipment | External Equipment | Creation Concept (Design, Production, Test, Service) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Chen et al. (2018) [37] | Automotive industry | No | No | Yes |
2 | Zhou et al. (2017) [38] | Energy industry | No | No | Yes |
3 | Dutta et al. (2018) [39] | Transportation equipment manufacturing | Yes | No | No |
4 | Weissenblock et al. (2014) [40] | Chemical fibers manufacturing | No | No | Yes |
5 | Chen et al. (2017) [41] | Food processing industry | No | No | Yes |
6 | Amirkhanove et al. (2014) [42] | Ordinary machinery industry | No | No | Yes |
7 | Zhou et al. (2011) [43] | Iron and steel industry | Yes | No | No |
8 | Wu et al. (2018) [44] | Chemical industry | No | No | Yes |
9 | Coffey et al. (2013) [45] | Specialized equipment manufacturing | No | No | Yes |
10 | Millette et al. (2016) [46] | Electronic equipment manufacturing | No | Yes | No |
# | Authors | Applied Technique | Contribution | Blockchain | Internet of Things | Challenges | Limitations |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Asutosh et al. [47] | Decentralized and cryptographical platform | Avoiding the central authority usage in decentralized and cryptographical platform for verification and connection | Yes | Yes | No | There is no improvement on data confidentiality |
2 | Marco et al. [48] | The technology of full-stack and view-point of system level | Choosing 6G technology based on view-point of system-level in communication models | No | No | Yes | No verification for security enhancement |
3 | Emanuel et al. [49] | Transaction Model | Improving the IoT privacy based on blockchain operations | Yes | Yes | No | No reduction on computational cost |
4 | Chao et al. [50] | Structure of Blockchain | Identifying the process between IoT and Blockchain | Yes | Yes | No | No changes in level of security |
5 | Bong et al. [51] | IoT devices security modul | Limit hacking based on usage of blockchain | Yes | Yes | Yes | Verification didn’t improve the security level |
6 | Yueyue et al. [52] | Secure and intelligent architecture | Applying deep reinforcement learning to increase the effectiveness of system based on secure and intelligent architecture | Yes | No | Yes | No improvement on privacy level |
7 | Maroufi Mohammad et al. [53] | IoT and Blockchain | Managing short comings and limitations based on high-level solution technology | Yes | Yes | Yes | Exact issue not designed with the proposed architecture |
8 | Alfonso et al. [54] | Integration of IoT and Blockchain | Testing the related researches to IoT and Blockchain | Yes | Yes | Yes | The level of complexity didn’t minimized |
9 | Lei et al. [55] | Blockchain and IoT integrated method | Integrated method secure the sensing data. | Yes | Yes | Yes | No reduction on overheard communication |
10 | Ishan et al. [56] | Centralized architecture | Reducing the over-head computational based on centralized architecture | Yes | Yes | Yes | Reduction of computational over-head has no effect on energy consumption changes |
Component | Description |
---|---|
IDE | Composer-Playground |
Memory | 32 GB |
CPU | Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8700 @3.20 GHz |
Python | 3.6.2 |
Operating System | Ubuntu Linux 18.04.1 LTS |
Docker Engine | Version 18.06.1-ce |
Docker Composer | Version 1.13.0 |
Hyperledger Fabric | V1.2 |
CLI Tool | Composer REST Server |
Node | V8.11.4 |
IoT Devices | Type of Device | Monitoring Resources | Purpose |
---|---|---|---|
Smart Sensors | Temperature | SM machine | Temperature data monitoring |
Smart Sensors | Humidity | SM machine | Humidity data monitoring |
Smart Sensors | Pressure | SM machine | Pressure data monitoring |
RFID Tags | Ultra high frequency | Drawing, model, material | Trace and monitor real-time data |
RFID Tags | Ultra high frequency | Operate, product, etc. | Trace and monitor real-time data |
RFID Reader | Ultra high frequency | Material, maintenance | Identify and track components |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Shahbazi, Z.; Byun, Y.-C. Improving Transactional Data System Based on an Edge Computing–Blockchain–Machine Learning Integrated Framework. Processes 2021, 9, 92. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9010092
Shahbazi Z, Byun Y-C. Improving Transactional Data System Based on an Edge Computing–Blockchain–Machine Learning Integrated Framework. Processes. 2021; 9(1):92. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9010092
Chicago/Turabian StyleShahbazi, Zeinab, and Yung-Cheol Byun. 2021. "Improving Transactional Data System Based on an Edge Computing–Blockchain–Machine Learning Integrated Framework" Processes 9, no. 1: 92. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9010092