Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Next Article in Journal
Fuzzy Bipolar Hypersoft Sets: A Novel Approach for Decision-Making Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Induction of Convolutional Decision Trees with Success-History-Based Adaptive Differential Evolution for Semantic Segmentation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

IoT-Driven Transformation of Circular Economy Efficiency: An Overview

by
Zenonas Turskis
1,* and
Violeta Šniokienė
2
1
Faculty of Civil Engineering, The Institute of Sustainable Construction, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, 03224 Vilnius, Lithuania
2
Department of Law, Business Management Faculty, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, 10223 Vilnius, Lithuania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Math. Comput. Appl. 2024, 29(4), 49; https://doi.org/10.3390/mca29040049
Submission received: 29 March 2024 / Revised: 25 June 2024 / Accepted: 26 June 2024 / Published: 28 June 2024

Abstract

:
The intersection of the Internet of Things (IoT) and the circular economy (CE) creates a revolutionary opportunity to redefine economic sustainability and resilience. This review article explores the intricate interplay between IoT technologies and CE economics, investigating how the IoT transforms supply chain management, optimises resources, and revolutionises business models. IoT applications boost efficiency, reduce waste, and prolong product lifecycles through data analytics, real-time tracking, and automation. The integration of the IoT also fosters the emergence of inventive circular business models, such as product-as-a-service and sharing economies, offering economic benefits and novel market opportunities. This amalgamation with the IoT holds substantial implications for sustainability, advancing environmental stewardship and propelling economic growth within emerging CE marketplaces. This comprehensive review unfolds a roadmap for comprehending and implementing the pivotal components propelling the IoT’s transformation toward CE economics, nurturing a sustainable and resilient future. Embracing IoT technologies, the authors embark on a journey transcending mere efficiency, heralding an era where economic progress harmonises with full environmental responsibility and the CE’s promise.

1. Introduction

The challenges of unsustainable environmental practices in a competitive business environment have spurred a global push for advancements in resource performance. Manufacturing organisations seeking international prominence recognise sustainability as crucial. Integrating sustainability into supply chains involves reassessing practices through lean, green, and circular economies. Data play a pivotal role in this shift, enabling predictive decision-making and leading to the emergence of intelligent manufacturing characterised by self-aware and self-predictive systems.
Companies are exploring ways to reuse materials, extend product life, and mitigate the adverse effects of the linear economic model (take–use–discard). The Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) supports complex manufacturing ecosystems and predictive decision-making. With the adoption of IoT technologies, the integration of machine learning (ML) and big data (BD) enhances data management.
Technological advances can significantly improve CE-oriented supply chains by reducing carbon emissions, enhancing recycling, and optimising logistics. The CE emphasises creating closed-loop supply chains with restorative practices to eliminate harmful substances. The intersection of the IoT and CE is transforming sustainable manufacturing.
This study examined the Web of Science Core Collection database to compile data for this review, focusing on articles mentioning “IoT” and “circular economy”. This study identified 112,694 publications on the IoT, 28,869 on the CE, and 243 addressing both. These publications were categorised by type and year, revealing a steady increase in research output, especially since 2015, indicating growing interest in these fields.
Furthermore, this study analysed the distribution of publications across different years to discern temporal trends and patterns. Table 1 showcases the distribution of publications by type across all years, highlighting the prevalence of highly cited articles, review articles, and other publication categories within each field. Meanwhile, Table 2 provides a breakdown of publications by year, illustrating variations in research output over time.
This article synthesises the scientific literature on the IoT and CE, highlighting the dynamic nature of research in these areas. The CE has gained attention in the last thirty years due to the detrimental impacts of linear models on the environment, such as climate change and biodiversity loss. Advocates stress the need for the CE to integrate economic and social considerations for sustainable development.
Efforts to connect everyday objects to the Internet began in the 1980s, with John Romkey’s Internet-controlled toaster in 1990 [1] and Paul Saffo’s [2] vision of sensor integration in 1997. The IoT concept, introduced by Ashton in 1999, has since evolved, transforming fields like inventory control and home automation.
The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) recognised the IoT’s significance in 2005 [3,4]. Technologies like Huawei’s Harmony OS illustrate progress in IoT infrastructure, expanding its use while reducing dependency on single processors or storage units.
IoT technologies are central in reshaping business operations within circular economic frameworks amidst environmental concerns and resource scarcity. The CE, known for its resource efficiency, aims to reduce waste by designing products for longevity, repair, and multiple lifecycles. The success of the CE hinges on the effective management, redistribution, and repurposing of products and materials, where the IoT plays a pivotal role.
This review explores the economic transformation driven by the IoT within the CE, examining applications in supply chain management, real-time tracking, data analytics, and automation to enhance efficiency and minimise waste. It also investigates the IoT’s role in circular business models like product-as-a-service and sharing economies, which extend product lifecycles and create economic opportunities. Additionally, this review considers the impact of the IoT on consumer engagement and its financial implications.
The IoT’s integration with the CE has significant sustainability implications, intertwining commerce and environmental stewardship. This integration can lead to job creation and economic growth, particularly in emerging CE markets. This review invites scholars, practitioners, and policymakers to explore the transformative synergy between the IoT and CE economics, highlighting technology’s role in promoting economic sustainability and resilience.
The IoT transforms the manufacturing, construction, services, and supply chain logistics industries. It facilitates effective control, monitoring, and optimisation through interconnected objects and sensors managed via various systems. This interconnectedness supports innovative applications through web activation and automation, enhancing supply chain visibility and control and fostering efficiency, innovation, and sustainability.
Despite its potential, widespread IoT adoption in the CE faces challenges such as structured data needs, interoperability issues, and technical limitations. Numerous studies have explored IoT applications in the CE, offering insights into closed-loop product lifecycle management, recycling optimisation, and sensor-integrated 3D-printed products. Further research is needed to address implementation challenges and barriers.
The CE has gained attention as a sustainable alternative to linear economic systems, promoting reuse, remanufacturing, and recycling. Digital technologies are crucial for transforming production systems and overcoming implementation challenges. The convergence of advanced technologies with economic paradigms emphasises sustainability, prompting a re-evaluation of practices through lean, green, and circular economies.
Businesses are exploring methods to reuse materials and product components, extending their value and mitigating the linear economy’s adverse effects. The IIoT complements predictive decision-making through the IoT, machine learning, and extensive data integration, promoting CE-based supply chains by reducing carbon emissions, improving remanufacturing processes, and optimising logistics operations.
The CE concept represents a shift towards a closed-loop system that minimises resource waste and emission leakages. It draws from various schools of thought, including cradle-to-cradle, ecology laws, looped and performance economy, regenerative design, and industrial ecology, aiming to eliminate waste and preserve product value through recycling and sustainable consumption.
This review emphasises the IoT’s role in the CE, examining its economic dimensions, applications in supply chain management, and impact on circular business models. It highlights the potential for job creation and economic growth in emerging CE markets, envisioning a future where economic progress aligns with environmental responsibility.
The growing literature on the IoT’s potential for the CE must be more comprehensive. While some reviews highlight the IoT’s importance for efficiency and productivity, others overlook its role in the CE transition. This research gap underscores the need for a review that explicitly examines the IoT’s significance in transitioning towards the CE, addressing critical research questions and emerging topics in academic discourse.

2. Materials and Methods

The authors chose a systematic review for its interdisciplinary insights and focused answers to research questions. It synthesises previous research, identifies emerging issues, and guides future efforts. This study, a novel contribution to the IoT and the CE, involved two researchers collaborating to select and review relevant articles.
By synthesising prior findings, this study advances the understanding of IoT-driven CE efficiency, building on established approaches.
The systematic literature search methodology ensures a comprehensive approach, summarising existing research to address specific scientific questions. This method enables a thorough synthesis of past work, providing well-supported conclusions that can inform policy-making and business strategies in the IoT and the CE.
This research operationalised the literature review process based on a primary question and objectives, focusing on relevant publications in the CE and IoT fields since 2020.
This study, by synthesising previous research findings, presents advancements in understanding the IoT-driven transformation of CE efficiency, aligning with the approaches adopted in prior studies.

Literature Review Methodology

Databases: Web of Science, Scopus;
Key terms: “Internet of things” AND “stakeholder”, “Stakeholder” AND “circular economy”, “Industry 4.0” AND “stakeholder”, “Industry 4.0” AND “circular economy”, “Digital technologies” AND “circular economy”;
Article types: journal articles and review articles;
Inclusion criteria: published articles and literature reviews from any country addressing the circular economy;
Exclusion criteria: book reviews, conference proceedings, articles in the press, and editorial reviews;
Period: 2020–2023.
The IoT-driven transformation of circular economy economics relies on several essential technologies and techniques, particularly in supply chain efficiency and resource optimisation. These tools and methods enable the seamless integration of the IoT within the CE framework. They are the building blocks for implementing IoT-driven transformation in the CE, particularly in supply chain efficiency and resource optimisation. Combining these tools and methods enables businesses to create more sustainable, efficient, and resilient CE practices.
Initially, this research reviewed Web of Science articles focusing on IoT technologies and their integration into CE frameworks. To ensure the credibility and reliability of findings, the prioritised sources were peer-reviewed journals, conferences, and renowned experts in the field. The selection process aimed to identify the predominant technologies and methodologies frequently discussed in the context of IoT-driven advancements within the CE.
The investigation identified the practical significance of 17 technologies and approaches for enhancing supply chain efficiency and resource optimisation within circular economic models. Articles were selected based on their relevance, credibility, and contribution to comprehensively understanding the IoT-enabled economic transformation within CE paradigms. Here are the essentials identified, presented in descending order of importance:
  • IoT devices and sensors: Bansal and Kumar [5] and Cui [6] emphasised the pivotal role of interconnected devices and sensors for collecting real-time data in IoT ecosystems.
  • Data analytics and big data: Koot et al. [7], Li et al. [8], and Li et al. [9] pointed out the importance of robust data analytics tools for processing and extracting valuable insights from IoT-generated data.
  • Connectivity technologies: Chaudhari et al. [10] and Nurelmadina et al. [11] investigated various connectivity options for efficient data transmission in IoT systems.
  • Cloud computing: Nguyen et al. [12], Alam [13], and Mishra and Tyagi [14] highlighted the role of cloud platforms in storing, processing, and analysing IoT data.
  • Edge computing: Alli and Alam [15], Sankaranarayanan et al. [16], and Yu et al. [17] emphasised the importance of edge computing for real-time decision-making in IoT systems.
  • Blockchain technology: Kouhizadeh et al. [18], Kamble et al. [19], and Esmaeilian et al. [20] investigated the use of blockchain for transparent and secure data sharing within supply chains.
  • Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning: Woschank et al. [21], Andronie et al. [22], and Sharma et al. [23] explored the role of AI and machine learning in optimising supply chain processes.
  • Automation and robotics: Ben-Daya et al. [24] and Verma et al. [25] emphasised the importance of IoT-driven automation in optimising resource use and supply chain efficiency.
  • Digital twins: Rasheed et al. [26] and Javaid and Haleem [27] highlighted using digital twins in modelling and simulating supply chain operations.
  • RFID and NFC technology: Elbasani et al. [28] and Tan and Sidhu [29] investigated the use of RFID and NFC technology for tracking and tracing products within supply chains.
  • Predictive maintenance: Ayvaz and Alpay [30] and Zonta et al. [31] emphasised the role of IoT in implementing predictive maintenance strategies.
  • Cybersecurity measures: Hassan et al. [32] and Li and Liu [33] highlighted the importance of cybersecurity measures in protecting IoT systems.
  • Data privacy and compliance: Ullah and Babar [34], Karale [35], and Nurgalieva et al. [36] emphasised the importance of adhering to data privacy regulations in IoT applications.
  • Supply chain mapping: de Oliveira et al. [37], Allen et al. [38], Dossa et al. [39], and Calzolari et al. [40] investigated techniques such as supply chain mapping for visualising and understanding material flow in CE systems.
  • Circular design principles: Sassanelli et al. [41], Hapuwatte et al. [42], and Rejeb et al. [43] explored the implementation of circular design principles in creating products aligned with CE goals.
  • Life cycle assessment (LCA): Nižetić et al. [44] and Ferrari et al. [45] highlighted the use of LCA in evaluating products’ environmental impacts.
  • Collaborative platforms: Rejeb et al. [46] and Tiwari [47] investigated collaborative platforms enabled by IoT for enhancing transparency and information sharing among supply chain partners.
These authors underscored the role of facilitating IoT-driven transformations within CE systems, emphasising data collection, analysis, connectivity, security, and sustainability principles.
This prioritisation underscores the role of these essential technologies and techniques in enabling IoT-driven transformations within CE systems, particularly in data collection, analysis, connectivity, security, and sustainability efforts. These tools and methods allow the integration of the IoT within the CE framework.
IoT devices and sensors provide real-time data and insights and are instrumental in addressing industry challenges. Javaid et al. [48] and Ren et al. [49] highlighted the pivotal role of IoT devices and sensors in providing real-time data and insights to organisations. This capability empowers organisations to make informed decisions, reduce costs, increase efficiency, enhance safety, and promote sustainability across various applications. The authors identified 20 critical problems addressed by IoT devices and sensors, including the following:
  • Real-time monitoring: Subahi and Bouazza [50] and Li et al. [51] investigated IoT sensors for real-time monitoring, helping detect and mitigate issues promptly.
  • Supply chain visibility: Helo and Shamsuzzoha [52] and Finkenstadt and Handfield [53] emphasised the role of IoT devices in enhancing supply chain visibility.
  • Environmental monitoring: Demanega et al. [54] and Asha et al. [55] highlighted the importance of IoT sensors in environmental monitoring for ecological health assessment.
  • Energy efficiency: Ahmad and Zhang [56] and Hossein Motlagh et al. [57] investigated how IoT sensors contribute to energy efficiency in buildings, factories, and smart grids.
  • Predictive maintenance: Liu et al. [58] and Fernandes et al. [59] pointed out the significance of sensors in predictive maintenance in preventing costly breakdowns.
  • Asset tracking: Khan et al. [60] and Patel et al. [61] highlighted the role of IoT devices in real-time asset tracking for optimisation and theft prevention.
  • Healthcare monitoring: Taiwo and Ezugwu [62] and Philip et al. [63] investigated IoT sensors in healthcare for patient monitoring and remote healthcare delivery.
  • Smart agriculture: Paul et al. [64] and Shaikh et al. [65] emphasised the contribution of IoT sensors to smart agriculture for data-driven decision-making.
  • Fleet management: Iyer [66] and Aguiar et al. [67] pointed out the importance of IoT devices in fleet management for safer and more efficient transportation.
  • Smart cities: Bibri [68] and Sarrab et al. [69] investigated the role of IoT sensors in smart cities for urban planning and resource utilisation.
  • Water management: Nie et al. [70] and Bwambale et al. [71] highlighted the importance of IoT sensors in water management for efficient resource utilisation and conservation.
  • Security and surveillance: Mocrii et al. [72] and Al-Turjman et al. [73] investigated how IoT devices support security systems, enhancing safety in homes, businesses, and public spaces.
  • Retail analytics: Caro and Sadr [74] and Boone et al. [75] pointed out the role of IoT sensors in retail analytics for better customer experiences and inventory control.
  • Wildlife conservation: Sandbrook et al. [76] and Petso et al. [77] emphasise using IoT sensors in wildlife conservation efforts to protect endangered species.
  • Smart homes: Iqbal et al. [78], Metallidou et al. [79], and Tahsien et al. [80] investigated how IoT sensors in smart homes improve energy efficiency and home security.
  • Waste management: Kang et al. [81], Nižetić et al. [82], and Wang et al. [83] highlighted the role of IoT devices in waste management for cost reduction and environmental impact mitigation.
  • Occupancy and space utilisation: Azimi and O‘Brien [84] and Valks et al. [85] pointed out how IoT sensors track occupancy in commercial spaces to optimise workspace and energy usage.
  • Agricultural drones: Boursianis et al. [86] and Bai et al. [87] investigated IoT sensors in agriculture for crop health assessment and pest control.
  • Weather forecasting: Ren et al. [88] and Fathi et al. [89] emphasised the contribution of IoT sensors to weather forecasting and disaster preparedness.
  • Safety and emergency response: Alsamhi et al. [90] and Swamy and Kota [91] highlighted how IoT sensors enable quick response and damage minimisation in safety and emergencies.
The information presented above shows that IoT devices and sensors play a crucial role in addressing industry challenges. Their ability to provide real-time data and insights enables organisations to make informed decisions and promote sustainability.
Data analytics and big data: Siow et al. [92] highlighted the crucial role of data analytics and big data in addressing IoT-related problems by processing and extracting valuable insights from the vast data generated by IoT devices and sensors. These technologies transform raw IoT data into actionable insights, empowering organisations to make informed decisions, improve processes, enhance efficiency, reduce costs, and address various IoT-related challenges across industries and applications. The authors identified 14 critical problems addressed by data analytics and big data, including the following:
  • Data processing and storage: Oussous et al. [93] and Dash et al. [94] pointed out the importance of big data technologies in efficiently managing and storing the significant volume of data generated by IoT devices.
  • Real-time analysis: Jabbar et al. [95] and Astill et al. [96] investigated how the real-time analysis of IoT data enables organisations to make immediate decisions, such as in predictive maintenance.
  • Pattern recognition: Amanullah et al. [97] and Adi et al. [98] emphasised the role of data analytics in identifying patterns, anomalies, and trends within IoT data, which is crucial for predictive maintenance and security.
  • Predictive insights: Sheng et al. [99] and Kumar et al. [100] highlighted how predictive analytics based on historical IoT data can forecast future events and trends, aiding proactive planning and resource allocation.
  • Optimisation: Aryal et al. [101], He et al. [102], and Araz et al. [103] investigated how data analytics optimises processes and resource allocations based on IoT data, such as in supply chain management.
  • Efficiency and cost savings: Atitallah et al. [104] and Ahmad et al. [105] pointed out how IoT data analysis leads to operational efficiency, energy consumption reduction, and cost savings, such as in smart buildings.
  • Personalisation: Grewal et al. [106] and Liu et al. [107] investigated how big data analytics personalises customer experiences by analysing behaviour and preferences derived from IoT data.
  • Data fusion: Chen et al. [108] and Chandra Shit [109] emphasised the importance of data fusion from various IoT sources for a comprehensive view, aiding route planning and logistics.
  • Data security: Sarker et al. [110] and Gupta et al. [111] highlighted how data analytics helps detect and respond to security threats within IoT data, essential for safeguarding IoT networks.
  • Environmental impact: Hassan et al. [112] and Almalki et al. [113] investigated how analysing IoT data related to environmental factors promotes sustainability by understanding ecological footprints and identifying waste reduction opportunities.
  • Customer insights: Holmlund et al. [114] and Sarker [115] investigated how organisations gain valuable insights into customer behaviour, preferences, and satisfaction by analysing customer data collected through IoT devices. This analysis allows for data-driven decision-making and improved customer experiences.
  • Regulatory compliance: Thapa and Camtepe [116] and Lo’ai and Saldamli [117] pointed out how big data analytics can help ensure compliance with data privacy and regulatory requirements, particularly when handling sensitive IoT data.
  • Supply chain optimisation: Bag et al. [118] and Jahani et al. [119] highlighted how data analytics helps demand forecasting, inventory management, and identifying supply chain bottlenecks or inefficiencies, contributing to better resource allocation and improved supply chain operations.
  • Waste reduction: Kurniawan et al. [120] and Lu et al. [121] investigated how data analytics optimises collection schedules, route planning, and recycling initiatives in waste management, reducing waste and promoting resource efficiency.
Data analytics, including customer insights, regulatory compliance, supply chain optimisation, and waste reduction, is crucial in business operations. By leveraging data analytics, organisations can enhance decision-making, improve efficiency, and drive sustainable practices across different domains.
Connectivity technologies are essential in the IoT context because they provide the means for IoT devices and sensors to communicate, share data, and access cloud services. Connectivity technologies are the backbone of the IoT ecosystem, providing the means for IoT devices to communicate and share data. They are instrumental in addressing IoT-related problems by enabling data collection, real-time monitoring, remote control, scalability, and accessibility, ultimately leading to more efficient, data-driven solutions across various industries and applications. The authors identified 14 critical problems addressed by connectivity technologies, including the following:
  • Data collection and transmission: Kassab and Darabkh [122] and Seferagić et al. [123] investigated how connectivity technologies, such as Wi-Fi, cellular networks, Bluetooth, Zigbee, and Low-Power Wide-Area Networks (LPWANs), enable data collection and transmission from IoT devices to central systems or the cloud, facilitating real-time monitoring.
  • Real-time monitoring: Hernández-Morales et al. [124] and Wang et al. [125] pointed out how connectivity technologies enable the real-time monitoring of devices and processes, crucial for industries like manufacturing, logistics, and healthcare, where timely data are essential for decision-making.
  • Remote control: Sharma et al. [126], and Aboubakar et al. [127] highlighted how connectivity technologies allow for remote control or management of IoT devices, enabling operators to adjust settings, apply updates, or troubleshoot issues from a distance.
  • Scalability: Centenaro et al. [128] and Firouzi et al. [129] investigated how connectivity technologies provide the infrastructure to scale IoT solutions, supporting adding more devices or expanding geographic coverage.
  • Accessibility: Rizvi et al. [130] and Wanasinghe et al. [131] emphasised how data accessibility from IoT devices, enabled by connectivity technologies, ensures stakeholders can access data and make informed decisions remotely.
  • Emergency response: Ali et al. [132] explored how connectivity technologies in security and safety systems enable quick emergency responses, sending real-time alerts and notifications to authorities or responsible parties.
  • Energy efficiency: Islam et al. [133] and Chilamkurthy et al. [134] highlighted how some connectivity technologies, like LPWANs, are designed to be energy-efficient, extending device lifespans and reducing maintenance requirements.
  • Asset tracking: Hayward et al. [135] and Song et al. [136] pointed out how connectivity technologies, including GPS and cellular networks, facilitate asset tracking and location-based services, valuable for tracking vehicles, goods, and people in logistics, transportation, and public safety.
  • Resource optimisation: Lv et al. [137] and Miles et al. [138] investigated how to analyse data transmitted via connectivity technologies to optimise resource usage, such as optimising irrigation in agriculture to conserve water using weather data transmitted over LPWANs.
  • Reduced downtime: Mohan et al. [139] and Soori et al. [140] emphasised how industrial settings and connectivity technologies support predictive maintenance by transmitting data about equipment conditions, reducing downtime by enabling timely maintenance before a breakdown occurs.
  • Data aggregation: Erhan et al. [141] and Thamilarasu et al. [142] highlighted how data aggregation over connectivity networks allows organisations to gain a holistic view of operations, identify trends, and detect anomalies by aggregating data from multiple IoT devices.
  • Remote updates: Bauwens et al. [143] and Mugarza et al. [144] investigated how connectivity enables remote software updates for IoT devices, which is critical for improving device security, adding new features, and fixing bugs without physical access.
  • Integration: Tavana et al. [145] and Farahani et al. [146] pointed out how connectivity technologies allow for the sharing of IoT data with enterprise software, cloud applications, and analytics platforms, facilitating comprehensive data utilisation through integration.
  • Consumer engagement: Del Rio et al. [147] and Li et al. [148] highlighted how connectivity technologies enable users to access and control devices remotely for IoT applications in the consumer market, such as smart homes and wearables. This remote access enhances convenience and engagement, allowing users to interact with their devices from anywhere.
Connectivity technologies are the foundation of the IoT and play a crucial role in enhancing consumer engagement for IoT applications in the consumer market. They enable data collection, real-time monitoring, remote control, scalability, and accessibility. These technologies addressing IoT-related challenges empower industries to develop more efficient, data-driven solutions across diverse applications.
In the dynamic and complex arena of the IoT, where an array of interconnected devices generates vast amounts of data, multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods play a crucial role in navigating complex decisions. MCDM techniques provide a structured and systematic approach for evaluating and selecting the most suitable options among multiple alternatives, considering various criteria and stakeholder preferences.
Cloud computing is essential in the IoT. Sharma and Obaidat [149] and Hamdan et al. [150] highlighted the crucial role of cloud computing in the IoT context, providing the infrastructure and capabilities to process, store, and analyse the vast amount of data generated by IoT devices and sensors. Cloud computing is indispensable for IoT solutions, offering the necessary infrastructure and tools for data management, analytics, and integration. It serves as a foundational technology, addressing IoT problems by enabling data scalability, real-time analytics, machine learning, data security, and more, thereby enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of IoT applications across industries. The authors identified 15 critical problems addressed by cloud computing in the IoT context:
  • Scalability: Kumar and Agrawal [151] and Mrozek et al. [152] pointed out that cloud platforms offer scalable resources, enabling the handling of increasing data volumes generated by IoT devices. This scalability is essential for accommodating many devices and ensuring consistent performance.
  • Data storage: Zdravevski et al. [153] and Mukherjee et al. [154] highlighted that cloud services store IoT data, ensuring data availability, redundancy, and durability. Storing data in the cloud also allows for historical data retention, which is valuable for analytics and compliance.
  • Real-time analytics: Rahmani et al. [155] and Wolf et al. [156] concluded that cloud computing platforms support real-time data analysis, which is crucial for monitoring and responding to IoT-generated data. Real-time analytics can detect anomalies, trigger alerts, and enable immediate responses to critical events.
  • Data processing: Krishnamurthi et al. [157] and Li [158] highlighted that IoT data often require pre-processing and transformation before using them for analytics and decision-making. Cloud computing platforms offer the computational power to process data at scale, extract insights, and generate meaningful reports.
  • Machine learning and AI: Ahmed et al. [159] and Lazaroiu et al. [160] pointed out that cloud platforms integrate machine learning and artificial intelligence services, which are essential for developing predictive models and automating decision-making based on IoT data, particularly for applications like predictive maintenance and anomaly detection.
  • Integration: Hashem et al. [161] and Shao et al. [162] concluded that cloud platforms facilitate the integration of IoT data with other data sources and enterprise systems, enabling comprehensive data utilisation and the creation of more holistic insights.
  • Geographic distribution: Salaht et al. [163], Carvalho et al. [164], and De Donno et al. [165] highlighted that cloud providers have data centres in multiple geographic regions, allowing low-latency access to data and services, which makes it feasible to deploy IoT solutions globally.
  • Security and compliance: Karie et al. [166] and Sun et al. [167] highlighted that cloud platforms offer robust security features and compliance certifications, safeguarding sensitive IoT data and ensuring that data handling aligns with industry-specific regulations.
  • Device management: Paiva et al. [168], Rahim et al. [169], and Mavromatis et al. [170] concluded that cloud services often include device management capabilities, making it easier to provision, monitor, and manage IoT devices remotely, crucial for large-scale deployments.
  • Cost efficiency: James et al. [171], Chowdhury et al. [172], and Centobelli et al. [173] pointed out that cloud computing allows organisations to pay only for the resources they use, reducing capital expenditures, essential for organisations seeking cost-effective IoT solutions.
  • Reliability: Xing [174] and Berger et al. [175] concluded that cloud providers offer high availability and redundancy, ensuring that IoT data are accessible and recoverable even during hardware failures or disasters.
  • APIs and SDKs: Song et al. [176] and Kristiani et al. [177] highlighted that cloud providers typically offer application programming interfaces (APIs) and software development kits (SDKs) that simplify the development of IoT applications and the integration of IoT data into other systems.
  • Remote access: Barros et al. [178], Werning and Spinler [179], and Mboli et al. [180] pointed out that cloud platforms enable remote access to IoT data and services, enabling the monitoring and management of IoT systems from anywhere with an Internet connection.
  • Collaboration: Jäger-Roschko and Petersen [181] and Chavez et al. [182] concluded that cloud platforms facilitate data sharing and collaboration among stakeholders and departments, which is valuable for organisations leveraging IoT data for various purposes.
  • Innovation: Hallioui et al. [183] and Gaiardelli et al. [184] highlighted that cloud providers continuously innovate by adding new features and services, keeping IoT solutions up to date and capable of addressing evolving business needs.
Cloud computing is the backbone of IoT solutions, enabling many benefits such as scalability, real-time analytics, machine learning integration, security, and cost-efficiency. By leveraging cloud platforms, organisations can effectively harness IoT technologies to drive business growth, enhance operational efficiency, and meet the evolving needs of their stakeholders.
For several reasons, edge computing is critical for the IoT. Rejeb et al. [43] and Cui et al. [185] highlighted that edge computing is essential for the IoT, addressing latency, bandwidth, data privacy, security, resilience, and real-time control challenges. Nain et al. [186] and Liu et al. [187] concluded that edge computing provides solutions that enhance the efficiency, security, and effectiveness of IoT applications across various industries and use cases. The authors identified 15 critical problems addressed by edge computing in the IoT context:
  • Reduced latency: Fraga-Lamas et al. [188] and Almalki et al. [113] pointed out that edge computing reduces latency in IoT applications, which is crucial for real-time responses in areas like autonomous vehicles and industrial automation.
  • Bandwidth optimisation: Jahanbakht et al. [189] and Rizi and Seno [190] investigated how edge computing reduces the need for vast data transmission to central servers, optimising bandwidth by processing data locally at the edge.
  • Data privacy and security: Khan et al. [191], Ranjbari et al. [192], and Kumar et al. [193] highlighted that edge computing addresses privacy concerns by processing sensitive data locally, reducing the risk of data breaches.
  • Resilience: Javed et al. [194], Bhuiyan et al. [195], and Mehmood et al. [196] pointed out that edge computing enhances system resilience, ensuring business continuity during network outages or cloud disruptions.
  • Offline operations: Rao and Deebak [197] and Botín-Sanabria et al. [198] concluded that edge computing allows devices to operate offline, which is crucial for IoT applications in remote or challenging environments.
  • Real-time control: Li et al. [199], Khan and Ali [200], and Escolar et al. [201] highlighted that edge computing enables the real-time control of devices and processes, which is essential for immediate responses in industrial automation and robotics.
  • Scalability: Shammar and Zahary [202], Fraga-Lamas et al. [188], and Ray and Kumar [203] pointed out that edge computing is scalable, accommodating increasing IoT endpoints and supporting ecosystem growth.
  • Distributed processing: Chen [204], Krishankumar and Ecer [205], and Mistry et al. [206] concluded that edge computing spreads data processing across multiple devices, enhancing system efficiency and performance.
  • Lower costs: Demestichas and Daskalakis [207] and Xu et al. [208] highlighted that edge computing reduces costs associated with data transmission, storage, and processing, minimising data transfer costs and cloud service fees.
  • Edge analytics: Talebkhah et al. [209], Khalil et al. [210], and Hossein Motlagh et al. [57] pointed out that edge computing allows for local analytics, enabling immediate insights and decision-making based on IoT data.
  • Adaptability: Albreem et al. [211] and Farahzadi et al. [212] concluded that edge computing devices can adapt to network conditions and latency requirements, prioritising and processing data based on application needs.
  • Autonomy: Liu et al. [213], Bhat and Alqahtani [214], and Song et al. [136] highlighted that edge computing devices can operate autonomously, making local decisions without constant communication with a central server.
  • Customisation: Perera et al. [215], Kubiak et al. [216], and Taneja et al. [217] pointed out that organisations can tailor edge computing solutions to their IoT needs, selecting hardware and software configurations according to their requirements.
  • Environmental sensing: Min [218], Diez-Olivan et al. [219], Malik et al. [220], and Dang et al. [221] concluded that edge computing in environmental monitoring detects anomalies, provides early warnings, and triggers actions locally, such as shutting down equipment or sounding alarms.
  • Enhanced user experience: Sun et al. [222], Javadzadeh and Rahmani [223], and Rathore et al. [224] highlighted that edge computing enhances user experiences in IoT applications by supporting real-time responses and reducing delays in consumer-facing applications like smart homes and augmented reality.
Edge computing is pivotal in addressing key challenges and providing solutions for various IoT-related problems, enhancing efficiency, security, and effectiveness across industries and use cases.
The CE and the IoT are transforming how stakeholders manage resources, marking a significant shift from traditional linear models to regenerative approaches focused on waste minimisation and resource maximisation. CE principles like recycling, rebuilding, and reusing or creating closed-loop systems reduce the environmental impact and promote sustainability.
The IoT reshapes industries by enabling the real-time monitoring, analysis, and control of physical objects through interconnected devices and sensors. Its integration with CE principles fosters a new resource management and sustainability era.
Integration of the IoT in the CE:
Innovation and efficiency: extend product lifespan, reduces environmental footprint, and fosters a sustainable, resource-efficient future.
Product-as-a-service models: encourage durable, repairable, and recyclable product designs, promoting the CE and resource efficiency.
Supply chain management: enhances transparency and traceability, promoting ethical sourcing and informed consumer decisions.
At the final stage of the overview, this research presents a SWOT analysis: integrating the IoT and the CE for a sustainable future.
By integrating IoT technologies into CE initiatives, stakeholders revolutionise resource management, drive sustainable innovation, and create a resilient, regenerative economy. This integration promises greater efficiency, reduced waste, and increased profitability, painting an optimistic future where sustainability and economic growth coexist. Leveraging the IoT for CE initiatives fosters a sustainable, resilient, and resource-efficient future, driving the transition to a greener economy.

3. SWOT Analysis: Unleashing the Transformative Power of Integrating Internet of Things and Circular Economy for a Sustainable Future

This analysis envisions the potential and progress in the relationship between IoT technologies and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). By thoroughly examining the existing literature and conducting several SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) analyses, this research highlights AI-driven technologies as powerful facilitators or potential barriers to each SDG. The SWOT analysis of integrating the IoT and CE principles is crucial in understanding this transformative approach’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. This analysis empowers stakeholders, guiding them in leveraging IoT technologies to enhance circular practices, driving locally and internationally sustainable development. By understanding these aspects, stakeholders can better utilise the IoT to promote sustainability and resource efficiency, which is crucial for success in this transformative approach.
The results from these analyses lay the groundwork for a broader exploration, showcasing the strides made in applying AI technologies to SDGs, identifying opportunities for further advancement in the current decade and addressing ongoing challenges to target crucial progress.
This study analysed six categories or perspectives of human needs: life (including health and safety), economic and technological development (including job creation and innovation), social development (including education and community building), equality (including gender and racial equality), resources (including energy and water), and the natural environment (including biodiversity and climate change). This research concludes with a crucial discussion of prospects, fundamental guidelines, and lessons learned. These guidelines are essential to steering AI developments and applications in a positive direction, fully supporting the attainment of the SDGs by 2030.
Integrating the IoT and CE principles offers substantial strengths. IoT technologies can track product lifecycles, optimise resource use, and enhance waste management efficiency. This integration can lead to significant environmental benefits, such as reduced CO2 emissions and efficient energy use, as shown in various case studies on Industry 4.0 and lean principles in manufacturing [225]. Moreover, the IoT facilitates the transformation of waste into valuable resources, contributing to environmental improvement and job creation [226].
However, notable weaknesses include high investment costs and technological readiness barriers [225]. The complexity of implementing IoT solutions, especially in traditional sectors, can hinder adoption. Additionally, interoperability, scalability, data security, and privacy challenges remain significant [227].
The opportunities are more than just vast. They are revolutionary. The IoT is at the forefront of driving the Fourth Industrial Revolution, transforming sectors such as energy and agri-food supply chains [228,229]. Predictive maintenance becomes a reality with the IoT, enhancing operational efficiencies and reducing waste. The potential for new business models and value chains based on the IoT and CE principles is immense, fostering sustainable development on a global scale [230].
While the opportunities are promising, it is crucial to acknowledge the potential hurdles. Threats such as excessive bureaucracy, lack of infrastructure, and social acceptability issues can pose significant challenges to the transition towards sustainability [231]. Legal and regulatory challenges and competition barriers also present risks to the widespread adoption of the IoT in CE initiatives [227].
In particular, artificial intelligence (AI) and digital technologies, such as big data, blockchain, cloud computing, and virtual and augmented reality, are revolutionising our society, propelling its transformation in the Fourth Industrial Revolution [232]. These technologies should consolidate as a societal and economic lever for transformation on a global scale, driving sustainability and efficiency across various sectors [188].
According to Palomares et al. [233], integrating AI and digital technologies has profound implications for achieving the United Nations’ SDGs by 2030. Similarly, integrating the IoT with CE principles can significantly promote sustainability and resource efficiency, offering substantial benefits. However, this integration also presents strategic challenges that stakeholders must address proactively to ensure success.

3.1. Strengths

Enhanced resource efficiency: The IoT enables the precise tracking and monitoring of resources, optimising their use and reducing waste [234]. For instance, in agriculture, IoT sensors can monitor soil moisture levels, allowing farmers to water their crops more efficiently and reduce water waste. Smart sensors and connected devices provide real-time data, enabling efficient resource management and minimising the environmental impact [235,236,237,238].
Improved lifecycle management: The IoT facilitates the monitoring of product lifecycles, enabling better maintenance, repair, and recycling processes [239,240]. It leads to extended product lifespans and supports the reuse and refurbishment of materials, which are fundamental principles of the CE system aimed at eliminating waste and the continual use of resources [241,242].
Data-driven decision-making: The IoT provides valuable insights through data analytics, helping businesses make informed decisions about resource utilisation, production processes, and waste management [48,243]. It can lead to significant cost savings and improved sustainability outcomes [44].

3.2. Weaknesses

High implementation costs: Integrating IoT technologies requires significant investment in infrastructure, sensors, and data management systems [244,245]. However, in some strategies, such as competitive innovation projects, each involving a small- and medium-sized enterprise (SME) and a large firm, the SMEs mitigate these costs by pursuing a synergistic mix of three distinct coopetition strategies: co-distribution, technology licensing, and R&D co-development [246].
Data privacy and security concerns: The widespread use of IoT devices raises concerns about privacy and security [247,248]. Ensuring that sensitive information is protected and secure is crucial to maintaining trust among stakeholders [35].
Complexity in integration: Combining the IoT with CE principles involves complex processes and systems [249,250]. Implementing the CE requires complex and dynamic changes in technical and behavioural aspects. The need for standardised protocols and interoperability among devices can pose challenges in achieving seamless integration [251].

3.3. Opportunities

Innovation and new business models: IoT-driven CE practices can spur innovation and lead to new business models, such as product-as-a-service and circular supply chains. For instance, understanding product circularity as “three-dimensional”—encompassing high material recirculation, high utilisation, and high endurance—can guide businesses to develop models that promote product reuse and reduce waste [252]. By adopting these principles, companies can ensure that materials are recovered, used intensely, and retain their value, thus aligning with CE objectives and fostering sustainable practices. This approach supports sustainability and opens new revenue streams by shifting from a traditional ownership model to a service-oriented one.
Van Eechoud and Ganzaroli’s [253] research underscores the pivotal role of dynamic capabilities in digital circular business model innovation. Their findings demonstrate that capabilities like market scanning, collaborative innovation, and strategic digital servitisation are crucial for sensing and seizing opportunities in circular business models. Moreover, AI capacities, such as perceptive, predictive, and prescriptive, enhance resource efficiency and support the development of AI-enabled circular business models (CBMs) through automation and augmentation. Integrating these initiatives into the core business necessitates robust IT project management and supply chain collaboration, underpinned by a long-term vision for digital circular business model innovation [254]. Finally, dynamic capabilities in value discovery, realisation, and optimisation are essential for aligning with customer ecosystems and realising the full potential of AI-enabled CBMs.
Santa-Maria et al. [255] stress the necessity of adopting a lifecycle perspective, formulating a sustainability strategy, and involving stakeholders for successful circular business model transformation. They identify specific practices vital for long-term business model innovation, such as top management commitment and early customer engagement, which align well with the IoT’s potential to revolutionise circular practices.
By leveraging IoT technologies, businesses can develop innovative solutions like advanced product–service systems and more efficient circular supply chains, ultimately driving sustainable development locally and globally. Liu et al. [256] highlight how emerging Industry 4.0 technologies create opportunities to enhance sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) under the CE perspective. These technologies help manufacturers meet evolving customer demands while minimising the environmental impact and preserving resources for future generations. Integrating the IIoT and emerging technologies enables real-time information sharing, fostering capabilities like digital sensing, seizing, and reconfiguring [257]. This digital transformation supports business model innovation and cultural shifts towards sustainability. Furthermore, integrating digital capabilities can address challenges in societal sustainability by enabling secure and rapid information exchange, promoting social equity and improving relationships with key suppliers.
Taddei et al. [258] underscore the pivotal role of IoT, big data analytics, and cloud computing in enabling circular supply chains and enhancing efficiency and competitiveness. When implemented systematically, these technologies can drive the transition towards circular supply chains, making it more feasible for businesses to adopt sustainable practices.
By harnessing these digital capabilities, companies can create innovative product–service systems that reduce waste and promote reuse. Advanced circular supply chains facilitated by the IoT and other Industry 4.0 technologies can significantly enhance operational efficiency, reduce environmental impact, and foster sustainable development. These technologies, such as big data, AI, and blockchain, enable companies to design resource and energy efficiency processes and increase profits from green products, overcoming barriers to sustainable operations [193]. As organisations integrate these technologies, they can better manage supply chains and implement effective strategies to achieve sustainability goals [259]. This integration supports global sustainability goals and opens new avenues for revenue generation and competitive advantage.
Understanding and utilising these dynamic capabilities enable companies to stay competitive and contribute to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals by promoting resource efficiency and sustainability [260].
Global collaboration: The IoT facilitates global collaboration by providing a platform for sharing data and best practices. It can help scale up CE initiatives and achieve SDGs globally. Dantas et al. [261] highlight the potential of integrating the CE with Industry 4.0 technologies to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). These technologies, including cyber–physical systems, IoT, big data, and cloud computing, can optimise production processes and enhance sustainable industry practices. These technologies drive sustainable smart manufacturing by leveraging data-driven analytics and IoT sensing networks to improve resource efficiency [262]. Integrating Industry 4.0 technologies with CE principles helps companies achieve eco-efficiency and strong sustainability, facilitating collaboration between managers and researchers [263]. Moreover, IoT tools address CE challenges, enabling manufacturing firms to transition towards more sustainable operations by aligning with government and supplier expectations [264]. The interconnected nature of Industry 4.0 technologies enables comprehensive data collection and intelligent manufacturing, driving innovation and efficiency.
The combination of the CE, Industry 4.0, and the IoT fosters systematic shifts towards sustainability by closing production cycles and maximising resource use, thus reducing raw material extraction. IoT-related technologies enable circular economies by supporting efficient resource utilisation and waste reduction [43]. Moreover, Industry 4.0 technologies significantly contribute to sustainable development by aligning with the triple bottom line and sustainable business models, enhancing social, economic, and environmental benefits [191]. This integration encourages global collaboration towards more sustainable and resilient production systems. By leveraging these advanced technologies, businesses can scale up their circular initiatives, facilitating broader international collaboration. This integration accelerates achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and supports the development of sustainable supply chains and communities.
Ciliberto et al. [265] emphasise that integrating the CE and Industry 4.0 technologies creates a synergistic environment essential for achieving holistic sustainability in production systems. Industry 4.0, characterised by the IoT, cyber–physical systems, big data, and cloud computing technologies, is a crucial enabler of sustainable performance and circular production models. This integration promotes a closed-loop supply chain with reused and recycled products, aligning with CE principles and optimising resource use. Moreover, leveraging these technologies helps businesses transition towards sustainable lean manufacturing, improving economic efficiency and reducing complexity in process flows.
Implementing CE-based business models supported by Industry 4.0 enables companies to redesign their strategies to focus on sustainable development. This approach drives innovation and ensures long-term environmental and economic benefits. Integrating the CE and Industry 4.0 technologies fosters a collaborative ecosystem, encouraging proactive partnerships between industrial companies and policymakers to promote continuous eco-innovation and sustainable growth [266]. Furthermore, adopting Industry 4.0 within sustainable manufacturing frameworks significantly enhances resource efficiency and product quality while reducing environmental impacts [267].
Enhanced consumer engagement: The IoT plays a crucial role in promoting sustainable practices by providing consumers with real-time information about the environmental impact of their choices. By leveraging IoT devices and advanced analytics platforms, retailers can offer consumers personalised insights into their purchasing habits, encouraging more eco-friendly decisions [268]. Additionally, sensor technologies in agriculture demonstrate how real-time data can improve transparency and traceability, enhancing consumer awareness and promoting sustainable consumption patterns [269]. Implementing IoT technologies can significantly influence consumer behaviour towards sustainability by providing real-time information on the environmental impact of their choices. According to Sima et al. [270], integrating the IoT in consumer engagement strategies can drive behavioural change and enhance demand for sustainable products by offering personalised and immediate feedback on consumer actions. Additionally, Allioui and Mourdi [271] emphasise that the IoT’s capability to improve decision-making processes and operational efficiency can instil confidence in consumers regarding the positive environmental impacts of their choices, thereby fostering greater adoption of sustainable practices.

3.4. Threats

Technological dependence: Overreliance on IoT technologies can result in vulnerabilities if systems fail. Xing [272] discusses how the malfunction of one IoT device can trigger cascading failures across interconnected devices, highlighting the importance of understanding and mitigating such risks to ensure the reliability of IoT systems. Mishra et al. [273] emphasise the need for a comprehensive approach to assess threats, identify vulnerabilities, and design corresponding mitigation strategies, especially in microgrid systems, to ensure resilience against physical and cyber threats. However, more is needed to understand and mitigate these risks. It is essential to develop backup plans and ensure system resilience to reduce the risks associated with technological dependence on IoT, and this is a task that stakeholders cannot delay.
Regulatory and compliance challenges: Successfully navigating the varying regulations and compliance requirements across different regions is a challenge and a strategic imperative for businesses in the evolving landscape of IoT cybersecurity. Chiara [274] examines the impact of the fast-evolving European cybersecurity regulatory framework on the IoT domain, advocating for the need for separate horizontal legislation on cybersecurity for connected products to avoid fragmentation of the EU’s Single Market. Similarly, Oyewole et al. [275] explore the transformative potential of Natural Language Processing (NLP) within financial reporting, highlighting the multifaceted implementation challenges and regulatory considerations. The study underscores the strategic importance of addressing these challenges to enhance the precision and reliability of financial reports, advocating for developing a robust framework for NLP applications in financial reporting.
Environmental impact of IoT devices: Addressing the lifecycle management of IoT devices is crucial to minimise their environmental footprint, as the production and disposal of these devices can have ecological impacts. Nižetić et al. [44] emphasise the need for careful monitoring and evaluation of the fast development of IoT technologies from an environmental perspective to limit harmful impacts and ensure intelligent resource utilisation. Similarly, Oláh et al. [276] discuss the negative effect of Industry 4.0 on ecological sustainability, highlighting issues such as air pollution, poor waste discharge, and intensive use of raw materials and energy. However, they also suggest that integrating Industry 4.0 with Sustainable Development Goals can enhance environmental sustainability and create a more positive ecological impact, offering solutions to existing environmental challenges.

4. Conclusions

The future of synergy between the IoT and the CE concept is promising. Technological advancements, evolving business models, and regulatory frameworks geared towards sustainable economic growth drive this potential. Embracing these trends empowers businesses to leverage the IoT’s transformative potential, paving the way for a circular and sustainable future with immense benefits. It is not just a suggestion but necessary for maximising the benefits and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals by 2030.
Humans cannot overstate the increasing importance of data in IoT-based sustainability solutions. Big data fuels artificial intelligence systems, making them indispensable for achieving SDGs globally. Integrating the IoT and CE principles offers significant potential for sustainable development and attaining the SDGs. However, it necessitates addressing various challenges, including high implementation costs, regulatory compliance, and environmental impact considerations. Stakeholders who effectively navigate these complexities are advised and empowered to capitalise on strengths, seize opportunities, mitigate threats, and remain attentive to future trends, advancing towards a more sustainable future.
In conclusion, while integrating the IoT and CE principles offers substantial opportunities to enhance sustainability and resource efficiency, addressing challenges related to implementation costs, data security, regulatory compliance, and technological dependence is crucial. This imperative for success underscores the urgency and importance of the task. Stakeholders can chart a course towards a more sustainable future by leveraging strengths, mitigating weaknesses, capitalising on opportunities, and addressing threats.
CE dimensions such as interconnectivity, information transparency, and technical assistance enable real-time monitoring, predictive maintenance, and data-driven decision-making, aligning with CE resource optimisation and waste reduction principles. Similarly, CE dimensions focusing on design for longevity, resource efficiency, and waste reduction complement contemporary practices by promoting sustainable product design and circular supply chain operations.
The joint effects of the IoT and CE foster resource optimisation, smart manufacturing, predictive maintenance, and data-driven circular design, empowering stakeholders to make informed decisions prioritising sustainability across the product lifecycle. Moreover, DM methods emerge as essential tools for navigating the complexities of decision-making in the IoT domain, facilitating informed choices that optimise resource utilisation and promote sustainable practices.
As the IoT continues to evolve, the integration of DM methods becomes increasingly crucial for ensuring the successful implementation and utilisation of IoT technologies across diverse sectors. By providing a structured approach for evaluating alternatives based on multiple criteria, DM techniques enable organisations to effectively navigate the challenges of sustainability and efficiency in the context of the CE.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.T. and V.Š.; methodology, Z.T.; investigation, Z.T. and V.Š.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.T.; writing—review and editing, V.Š.; visualization, Z.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The research is based on the investigation of the articles referred in the WoS “Clarivate Analytics” and Scholar Google databases.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Romkey, J. Toast of the IoT: The 1990 interop internet toaster. IEEE Consum. Electron. Mag. 2016, 6, 116–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Saffo, P. Sensors: The next wave of innovation. Commun. ACM 1997, 40, 92–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. International Telecommunication Union. ITU Internet Reports 2005: The Internet of Things; International Telecommunication Union (ITU): Geneva, Switzerland, 2005; Available online: https://www.itu.int/net/wsis/tunis/newsroom/stats/The-Internet-of-Things-2005.pdf (accessed on 28 March 2024).
  4. Hajjaji, Y.; Boulila, W.; Farah, I.R.; Romdhani, I.; Hussain, A. Big data and IoT-based applications in smart environments: A systematic review. Comput. Sci. Rev. 2021, 39, 100318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bansal, S.; Kumar, D. IoT ecosystem: A survey on devices, gateways, operating systems, middleware and communication. Int. J. Wirel. Inf. Netw. 2020, 27, 340–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cui, F. Deployment and integration of smart sensors with IoT devices detecting fire disasters in huge forest environment. Comput. Commun. 2020, 150, 818–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Koot, M.; Mes, M.R.; Iacob, M.E. A systematic literature review of supply chain decision making supported by the Internet of Things and Big Data Analytics. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2021, 154, 107076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, C.; Chen, Y.; Shang, Y. A review of industrial big data for decision making in intelligent manufacturing. Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J. 2022, 29, 101021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, W.; Chai, Y.; Khan, F.; Jan, S.R.U.; Verma, S.; Menon, V.G.; Kavita; Li, X. A comprehensive survey on machine learning-based big data analytics for IoT-enabled smart healthcare system. Mob. Netw. Appl. 2021, 26, 234–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chaudhari, B.S.; Zennaro, M.; Borkar, S. LPWAN technologies: Emerging application characteristics, requirements, and design considerations. Future Internet 2020, 12, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nurelmadina, N.; Hasan, M.K.; Memon, I.; Saeed, R.A.; Ariffin, K.A.Z.; Ali, E.S.; Mokhtar, R.A.; Islam, S.; Hossain, E.; Hassan, A. A systematic review on cognitive radio in low power wide area network for industrial IoT applications. Sustainability 2021, 13, 338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nguyen, D.C.; Ding, M.; Pathirana, P.N.; Seneviratne, A.; Li, J.; Poor, H.V. Federated learning for Internet of Things: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2021, 23, 1622–1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Alam, T. Cloud-based IoT applications and their roles in smart cities. Smart Cities 2021, 4, 1196–1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mishra, S.; Tyagi, A.K. The Role of Machine Learning Techniques in Internet of Things-Based Cloud Applications. In Artificial Intelligence-Based Internet of Things Systems. Internet of Things; Pal, S., De, D., Buyya, R., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 105–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Alli, A.A.; Alam, M.M. The fog cloud of things: A survey on concepts, architecture, standards, tools, and applications. Internet Things 2020, 9, 100177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sankaranarayanan, S.; Rodrigues, J.J.; Sugumaran, V.; Kozlov, S. Data flow and distributed deep neural network based low latency IoT-edge computation model for big data environment. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2020, 94, 103785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yu, W.; Liang, F.; He, X.; Hatcher, W.G.; Lu, C.; Lin, J.; Yang, X. A survey on the edge computing for the Internet of Things. IEEE Access 2017, 6, 6900–6919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kouhizadeh, M.; Zhu, Q.; Sarkis, J. Blockchain and the circular economy: Potential tensions and critical reflections from practice. Prod. Plan. Control 2020, 31, 950–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kamble, S.S.; Gunasekaran, A.; Sharma, R. Modeling the blockchain enabled traceability in agriculture supply chain. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2020, 52, 101967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Esmaeilian, B.; Sarkis, J.; Lewis, K.; Behdad, S. Blockchain for the future of sustainable supply chain management in Industry 4.0. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020, 163, 105064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Woschank, M.; Rauch, E.; Zsifkovits, H. A review of further directions for artificial intelligence, machine learning, and deep learning in smart logistics. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Andronie, M.; Lăzăroiu, G.; Iatagan, M.; Uță, C.; Ștefănescu, R.; Cocoșatu, M. Artificial intelligence-based decision-making algorithms, Internet of Things sensing networks, and deep learning-assisted smart process management in cyber-physical production systems. Electronics 2021, 10, 2497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sharma, R.; Kamble, S.S.; Gunasekaran, A.; Kumar, V.; Kumar, A. A systematic literature review on machine learning applications for sustainable agriculture supply chain performance. Comput. Oper. Res. 2020, 119, 104926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ben-Daya, M.; Hassini, E.; Bahroun, Z. Internet of Things and supply chain management: A literature review. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2019, 57, 4719–4742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Verma, A.; Bhattacharya, P.; Madhani, N.; Trivedi, C.; Bhushan, B.; Tanwar, S.; Sharma, G.; Bokoro, P.N.; Sharma, R. Blockchain for industry 5.0: Vision, opportunities, key enablers, and future directions. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 69160–69199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Rasheed, A.; San, O.; Kvamsdal, T. Digital Twin: Values, challenges and enablers from a modeling perspective. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 21980–22012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Javaid, M.; Haleem, A. Digital Twin applications toward Industry 4.0: A Review. Cogn. Robot. 2023, 3, 71–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Elbasani, E.; Siriporn, P.; Choi, J.S. A Survey on RFID in Industry 4.0. Internet of Things for Industry 4.0: Design, Challenges and Solutions. In Internet of Things for Industry 4.0. EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing; Kanagachidambaresan, G., Anand, R., Balasubramanian, E., Mahima, V., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tan, W.C.; Sidhu, M.S. Review of RFID and IoT integration in supply chain management. Oper. Res. Perspect. 2022, 9, 100229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ayvaz, S.; Alpay, K. Predictive maintenance system for production lines in manufacturing: A machine learning approach using IoT data in real-time. Expert Syst. Appl. 2021, 173, 114598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zonta, T.; Da Costa, C.A.; da Rosa Righi, R.; de Lima, M.J.; da Trindade, E.S.; Li, G.P. Predictive maintenance in the industry 4.0: A systematic literature review. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2020, 150, 106889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hassan, M.M.; Gumaei, A.; Huda, S.; Almogren, A. Increasing the trustworthiness in the industrial IoT networks through a reliable cyberattack detection model. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2020, 16, 6154–6162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, Y.; Liu, Q. A comprehensive review study of cyber-attacks and cyber security; Emerging trends and recent developments. Energy Rep. 2021, 7, 8176–8186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ullah, F.; Babar, M.A. On the scalability of big data cyber security analytics systems. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 2022, 198, 103294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Karale, A. The challenges of IoT addressing security, ethics, privacy, and laws. Internet Things 2021, 15, 100420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nurgalieva, L.; O’Callaghan, D.; Doherty, G. Security and privacy of mHealth applications: A scoping review. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 104247–104268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. de Oliveira, C.T.; Luna, M.M.; Campos, L.M. Understanding the Brazilian expanded polystyrene supply chain and its reverse logistics towards circular economy. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 235, 562–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Allen, S.D.; Zhu, Q.; Sarkis, J. Expanding conceptual boundaries of the sustainable supply chain management and circular economy nexus. Clean. Logist. Supply Chain 2021, 2, 100011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Dossa, A.A.; Gough, A.; Batista, L.; Mortimer, K. Diffusion of circular economy practices in the UK wheat food supply chain. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 2022, 25, 328–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Calzolari, T.; Genovese, A.; Brint, A. Circular Economy indicators for supply chains: A systematic literature review. Environ. Sustain. Indic. 2022, 13, 100160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sassanelli, C.; Urbinati, A.; Rosa, P.; Chiaroni, D.; Terzi, S. Addressing circular economy through design for X approaches: A systematic literature review. Comput. Ind. 2020, 120, 103245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hapuwatte, B.M.; Jawahir, I.S. Closed-loop sustainable product design for circular economy. J. Ind. Ecol. 2021, 25, 1430–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Rejeb, A.; Suhaiza, Z.; Rejeb, K.; Seuring, S.; Treiblmaier, H. The Internet of Things and the circular economy: A systematic literature review and research agenda. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 350, 131439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Nižetić, S.; Šolić, P.; González-de-Artaza, D.L.D.I.; Patrono, L. Internet of Things (IoT): Opportunities, issues and challenges towards a smart and sustainable future. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 274, 122877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ferrari, A.M.; Volpi, L.; Settembre-Blundo, D.; García-Muiña, F.E. Dynamic life cycle assessment (LCA) integrating life cycle inventory (LCI) and Enterprise resource planning (ERP) in an industry 4.0 environment. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 286, 125314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Rejeb, A.; Keogh, J.G.; Simske, S.J.; Stafford, T.; Treiblmaier, H. Potentials of blockchain technologies for supply chain collaboration: A conceptual framework. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2021, 32, 973–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Tiwari, S. Supply chain integration and Industry 4.0: A systematic literature review. Benchmarking Int. J. 2021, 28, 990–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Javaid, M.; Haleem, A.; Singh, R.P.; Suman, R.; Gonzalez, E.S. Understanding the adoption of Industry 4.0 technologies in improving environmental sustainability. Sustain. Oper. Comput. 2022, 3, 203–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ren, S.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Sakao, T.; Huisingh, D.; Almeida, C.M. A comprehensive review of big data analytics throughout product lifecycle to support sustainable smart manufacturing: A framework, challenges and future research directions. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 210, 1343–1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Subahi, A.F.; Bouazza, K.E. An intelligent IoT-based system design for controlling and monitoring greenhouse temperature. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 125488–125500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Li, H.; Guo, Y.; Zhao, H.; Wang, Y.; Chow, D. Towards automated greenhouse: A state of the art review on greenhouse monitoring methods and technologies based on Internet of Things. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2021, 191, 106558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Helo, P.; Shamsuzzoha, A.H.M. Real-time supply chain—A blockchain architecture for project deliveries. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 2020, 63, 101909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Finkenstadt, D.J.; Handfield, R. Blurry vision: Supply chain visibility for personal protective equipment during COVID-19. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 2021, 27, 100689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Demanega, I.; Mujan, I.; Singer, B.C.; Anđelković, A.S.; Babich, F.; Licina, D. Performance assessment of low-cost environmental monitors and single sensors under variable indoor air quality and thermal conditions. Build. Environ. 2021, 187, 107415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Asha, P.; Natrayan, L.; Geetha, B.; Beulah, J.R.; Sumathy, R.; Varalakshmi, G.; Neelakandan, S. IoT enabled environmental toxicology for air pollution monitoring using AI techniques. Environ. Res. 2022, 205, 112574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Ahmad, T.; Zhang, D. Using the Internet of Things in smart energy systems and networks. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2021, 68, 102783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hossein Motlagh, N.; Mohammadrezaei, M.; Hunt, J.; Zakeri, B. Internet of Things (IoT) and the energy sector. Energies 2020, 13, 494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Liu, C.; Tang, D.; Zhu, H.; Nie, Q. A novel predictive maintenance method based on deep adversarial learning in the intelligent manufacturing system. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 49557–49575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Fernandes, J.; Reis, J.; Melão, N.; Teixeira, L.; Amorim, M. The role of Industry 4.0 and BPMN in the arise of condition-based and predictive maintenance: A case study in the automotive industry. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 3438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Khan, W.Z.; Rehman, M.H.; Zangoti, H.M.; Afzal, M.K.; Armi, N.; Salah, K. Industrial Internet of Things: Recent advances, enabling technologies and open challenges. Comput. Electr. Eng. 2020, 81, 106522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Patel, V.; Chesmore, A.; Legner, C.M.; Pandey, S. Trends in workplace wearable technologies and connected-worker solutions for next-generation occupational safety, health, and productivity. Adv. Intell. Syst. 2022, 4, 2100099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Taiwo, O.; Ezugwu, A.E. Smart healthcare support for remote patient monitoring during COVID-19 quarantine. Inform. Med. Unlocked 2020, 20, 100428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Philip, N.Y.; Rodrigues, J.J.; Wang, H.; Fong, S.J.; Chen, J. Internet of Things for in-home health monitoring systems: Current advances, challenges and future directions. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2021, 39, 300–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Paul, K.; Chatterjee, S.S.; Pai, P.; Varshney, A.; Juikar, S.; Prasad, V.; Bhadra, B.; Dasgupta, S. Viable smart sensors and their application in data driven agriculture. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2022, 198, 107096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Shaikh, T.A.; Rasool, T.; Lone, F.R. Towards leveraging the role of machine learning and artificial intelligence in precision agriculture and smart farming. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2022, 198, 107119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Iyer, L.S. AI enabled applications towards intelligent transportation. Transp. Eng. 2021, 5, 100083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Aguiar, A.; Fernandes, P.; Guerreiro, A.P.; Tomás, R.; Agnelo, J.; Santos, J.L.; Araújo, F.; Coelho, M.C.; Fonseca, C.M.; D’orey, P.M.; et al. MobiWise: Eco-routing decision support leveraging the Internet of Things. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2022, 87, 104180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Bibri, S.E. The IoT for smart sustainable cities of the future: An analytical framework for sensor-based big data applications for environmental sustainability. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2018, 38, 230–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Sarrab, M.; Pulparambil, S.; Awadalla, M. Development of an IoT based real-time traffic monitoring system for city governance. Glob. Transit. 2020, 2, 230–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Nie, X.; Fan, T.; Wang, B.; Li, Z.; Shankar, A.; Manickam, A. Big data analytics and IoT in operation safety management in under water management. Comput. Commun. 2020, 154, 188–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Bwambale, E.; Abagale, F.K.; Anornu, G.K. Smart irrigation monitoring and control strategies for improving water use efficiency in precision agriculture: A review. Agric. Water Manag. 2022, 260, 107324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Mocrii, D.; Chen, Y.; Musilek, P. IoT-based smart homes: A review of system architecture, software, communications, privacy and security. Internet Things 2018, 1, 81–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Al-Turjman, F.; Zahmatkesh, H.; Shahroze, R. An overview of security and privacy in smart cities’ IoT communications. Trans. Emerg. Telecommun. Technol. 2022, 33, e3677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Caro, F.; Sadr, R. The Internet of Things (IoT) in retail: Bridging supply and demand. Bus. Horiz. 2019, 62, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Boone, T.; Ganeshan, R.; Jain, A.; Sanders, N.R. Forecasting sales in the supply chain: Consumer analytics in the big data era. Int. J. Forecast. 2019, 35, 170–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Sandbrook, C.; Clark, D.; Toivonen, T.; Simlai, T.; O’Donnell, S.; Cobbe, J.; Adams, W. Principles for the socially responsible use of conservation monitoring technology and data. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 2021, 3, e374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Petso, T.; Jamisola, R.S.; Mpoeleng, D. Review on methods used for wildlife species and individual identification. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 2022, 68, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Iqbal, J.; Khan, M.; Talha, M.; Farman, H.; Jan, B.; Muhammad, A.; Khattak, H.A. A generic Internet of Things architecture for controlling electrical energy consumption in smart homes. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2018, 43, 443–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Metallidou, C.K.; Psannis, K.E.; Egyptiadou, E.A. Energy efficiency in smart buildings: IoT approaches. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 63679–63699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Tahsien, S.M.; Karimipour, H.; Spachos, P. Machine learning based solutions for security of Internet of Things (IoT): A survey. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 2020, 161, 102630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Kang, K.D.; Kang, H.; Ilankoon, I.M.S.K.; Chong, C.Y. Electronic waste collection systems using Internet of Things (IoT): Household electronic waste management in Malaysia. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 252, 119801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Nižetić, S.; Djilali, N.; Papadopoulos, A.; Rodrigues, J.J. Smart technologies for promotion of energy efficiency, utilization of sustainable resources and waste management. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 231, 565–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Wang, C.; Qin, J.; Qu, C.; Ran, X.; Liu, C.; Chen, B. A smart municipal waste management system based on deep-learning and Internet of Things. Waste Manag. 2021, 135, 20–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Azimi, S.; O’Brien, W. Fit-for-purpose: Measuring occupancy to support commercial building operations: A review. Build. Environ. 2022, 212, 108767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Valks, B.; Arkesteijn, M.; Den Heijer, A. Smart campus tools 2.0 exploring the use of real-time space use measurement at universities and organizations. Facilities 2019, 37, 961–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Boursianis, A.D.; Papadopoulou, M.S.; Diamantoulakis, P.; Liopa-Tsakalidi, A.; Barouchas, P.; Salahas, G.; Karagiannidis, G.; Wan, S.; Goudos, S.K. Internet of things (IoT) and agricultural unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in smart farming: A comprehensive review. Internet Things 2022, 18, 100187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Bai, C.; Dallasega, P.; Orzes, G.; Sarkis, J. Industry 4.0 technologies assessment: A sustainability perspective. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2020, 229, 107776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Ren, X.; Li, X.; Ren, K.; Song, J.; Xu, Z.; Deng, K.; Wang, X. Deep learning-based weather prediction: A survey. Big Data Res. 2021, 23, 100178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Fathi, M.; Haghi Kashani, M.; Jameii, S.M.; Mahdipour, E. Big data analytics in weather forecasting: A systematic review. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 2022, 29, 1247–1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Alsamhi, S.H.; Ma, O.; Ansari, M.S.; Almalki, F.A. Survey on collaborative smart drones and Internet of Things for improving smartness of smart cities. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 128125–128152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Swamy, S.N.; Kota, S.R. An empirical study on system level aspects of Internet of Things (IoT). IEEE Access 2020, 8, 188082–188134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Siow, E.; Tiropanis, T.; Hall, W. Analytics for the Internet of Things: A survey. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 2018, 51, 1–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Oussous, A.; Benjelloun, F.Z.; Lahcen, A.A.; Belfkih, S. Big Data technologies: A survey. J. King Saud Univ. Comput. Inf. Sci. 2018, 30, 431–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Dash, S.; Shakyawar, S.K.; Sharma, M.; Kaushik, S. Big data in healthcare: Management, analysis and future prospects. J. Big Data 2019, 6, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Jabbar, A.; Akhtar, P.; Dani, S. Real-time big data processing for instantaneous marketing decisions: A problematization approach. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2020, 90, 558–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Astill, J.; Dara, R.A.; Fraser, E.D.; Roberts, B.; Sharif, S. Smart poultry management: Smart sensors, big data, and the Internet of Things. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2020, 170, 105291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Amanullah, M.A.; Habeeb, R.A.A.; Nasaruddin, F.H.; Gani, A.; Ahmed, E.; Nainar, A.S.M.; Akim, N.M.; Imran, M. Deep learning and big data technologies for IoT security. Comput. Commun. 2020, 151, 495–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Adi, E.; Anwar, A.; Baig, Z.; Zeadally, S. Machine learning and data analytics for the IoT. Neural Comput. Appl. 2020, 32, 16205–16233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Sheng, J.; Amankwah-Amoah, J.; Khan, Z.; Wang, X. COVID-19 pandemic in the new era of big data analytics: Methodological innovations and future research directions. Br. J. Manag. 2021, 32, 1164–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Kumar, A.; Shankar, R.; Aljohani, N.R. A big data driven framework for demand-driven forecasting with effects of marketing-mix variables. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2020, 90, 493–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Aryal, A.; Liao, Y.; Nattuthurai, P.; Li, B. The emerging big data analytics and IoT in supply chain management: A systematic review. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2020, 25, 141–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. He, L.; Xue, M.; Gu, B. Internet-of-things enabled supply chain planning and coordination with big data services: Certain theoretic implications. J. Manag. Sci. Eng. 2020, 5, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Araz, O.M.; Choi, T.M.; Olson, D.L.; Salman, F.S. Role of analytics for operational risk management in the era of big data. Decis. Sci. 2020, 51, 1320–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Atitallah, S.B.; Driss, M.; Boulila, W.; Ghézala, H.B. Leveraging Deep Learning and IoT big data analytics to support the smart cities development: Review and future directions. Comput. Sci. Rev. 2020, 38, 100303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Ahmad, T.; Zhang, D.; Huang, C.; Zhang, H.; Dai, N.; Song, Y.; Chen, H. Artificial intelligence in sustainable energy industry: Status Quo, challenges and opportunities. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 289, 125834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Grewal, D.; Hulland, J.; Kopalle, P.K.; Karahanna, E. The future of technology and marketing: A multidisciplinary perspective. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2020, 48, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Liu, Y.; Soroka, A.; Han, L.; Jian, J.; Tang, M. Cloud-based big data analytics for customer insight-driven design innovation in SMEs. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2020, 51, 102034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Chen, Y.T.; Sun, E.W.; Chang, M.F.; Lin, Y.B. Pragmatic real-time logistics management with traffic IoT infrastructure: Big data predictive analytics of freight travel time for Logistics 4.0. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2021, 238, 108157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Chandra Shit, R. Crowd intelligence for sustainable futuristic intelligent transportation system: A review. IET Intell. Transp. Syst. 2020, 14, 480–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Sarker, I.H.; Kayes, A.S.M.; Badsha, S.; Alqahtani, H.; Watters, P.; Ng, A. Cybersecurity data science: An overview from machine learning perspective. J. Big Data 2020, 7, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Gupta, R.; Tanwar, S.; Tyagi, S.; Kumar, N. Machine learning models for secure data analytics: A taxonomy and threat model. Comput. Commun. 2020, 153, 406–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Hassan, S.T.; Wang, P.; Khan, I.; Zhu, B. The impact of economic complexity, technology advancements, and nuclear energy consumption on the ecological footprint of the USA: Towards circular economy initiatives. Gondwana Res. 2023, 113, 237–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Almalki, F.A.; Alsamhi, S.H.; Sahal, R.; Hassan, J.; Hawbani, A.; Rajput, N.S.; Saif, A.; Morgan, J.; Breslin, J. Green IoT for eco-friendly and sustainable smart cities: Future directions and opportunities. Mob. Netw. Appl. 2023, 28, 178–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Holmlund, M.; Van Vaerenbergh, Y.; Ciuchita, R.; Ravald, A.; Sarantopoulos, P.; Ordenes, F.V.; Zaki, M. Customer experience management in the age of big data analytics: A strategic framework. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 116, 356–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Sarker, I.H. Data science and analytics: An overview from data-driven smart computing, decision-making and applications perspective. SN Comput. Sci. 2021, 2, 377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Thapa, C.; Camtepe, S. Precision health data: Requirements, challenges and existing techniques for data security and privacy. Comput. Biol. Med. 2021, 129, 104130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Lo’ai, A.T.; Saldamli, G. Reconsidering big data security and privacy in cloud and mobile cloud systems. J. King Saud Univ. Comput. Inf. Sci. 2021, 33, 810–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Bag, S.; Wood, L.C.; Xu, L.; Dhamija, P.; Kayikci, Y. Big data analytics as an operational excellence approach to enhance sustainable supply chain performance. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020, 153, 104559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Jahani, H.; Jain, R.; Ivanov, D. Data science and big data analytics: A systematic review of methodologies used in the supply chain and logistics research. Ann. Oper. Res. 2023, 1–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Kurniawan, T.A.; Meidiana, C.; Othman, M.H.D.; Goh, H.H.; Chew, K.W. Strengthening waste recycling industry in Malang (Indonesia): Lessons from waste management in the era of Industry 4.0. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 382, 135296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Lu, X.; Pu, X.; Han, X. Sustainable smart waste classification and collection system: A bi-objective modeling and optimization approach. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 276, 124183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Kassab, W.A.; Darabkh, K.A. A–Z survey of Internet of Things: Architectures, protocols, applications, recent advances, future directions and recommendations. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 2020, 163, 102663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Seferagić, A.; Famaey, J.; De Poorter, E.; Hoebeke, J. Survey on wireless technology trade-offs for the Industrial Internet of Things. Sensors 2020, 20, 488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Hernández-Morales, C.A.; Luna-Rivera, J.M.; Perez-Jimenez, R. Design and deployment of a practical IoT-based monitoring system for protected cultivations. Comput. Commun. 2022, 186, 51–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Wang, J.; Chen, M.; Zhou, J.; Li, P. Data communication mechanism for greenhouse environment monitoring and control: An agent-based IoT system. Inf. Process. Agric. 2020, 7, 444–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Sharma, P.; Jain, S.; Gupta, S.; Chamola, V. Role of machine learning and deep learning in securing 5G-driven industrial IoT applications. Ad Hoc Netw. 2021, 123, 102685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Aboubakar, M.; Kellil, M.; Roux, P. A review of IoT network management: Current status and perspectives. J. King Saud Univ. Comput. Inf. Sci. 2022, 34, 4163–4176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Centenaro, M.; Costa, C.E.; Granelli, F.; Sacchi, C.; Vangelista, L. A survey on technologies, standards and open challenges in satellite IoT. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2021, 23, 1693–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Firouzi, F.; Farahani, B.; Marinšek, A. The convergence and interplay of edge, fog, and cloud in the AI-driven Internet of Things (IoT). Inf. Syst. 2022, 107, 101840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Rizvi, S.; Pipetti, R.; McIntyre, N.; Todd, J.; Williams, I. Threat model for securing Internet of Things (IoT) network at device-level. Internet Things 2020, 11, 100240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Wanasinghe, T.R.; Gosine, R.G.; James, L.A.; Mann, G.K.; De Silva, O.; Warrian, P.J. The Internet of Things in the oil and gas industry: A systematic review. IEEE Internet Things J. 2020, 7, 8654–8673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Ali, K.; Nguyen, H.X.; Vien, Q.-T.; Shah, P.; Raza, M.; Paranthaman, V.V.; Er-Rahmadi, B.; Awais, M.; Islam, S.U.; Rodrigues, J.J.P.C. Review and implementation of resilient public safety networks: 5G, IoT, and emerging technologies. IEEE Netw. 2021, 35, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Islam, M.M.; Nooruddin, S.; Karray, F.; Muhammad, G. Internet of Things: Device Capabilities, Architectures, Protocols, and Smart Applications in Healthcare Domain. IEEE Internet Things J. 2022, 10, 3611–3641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Chilamkurthy, N.S.; Pandey, O.J.; Ghosh, A.; Cenkeramaddi, L.R.; Dai, H.N. Low-power wide-area networks: A broad overview of its different aspects. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 81926–81959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Hayward, S.J.; van Lopik, K.; Hinde, C.; West, A.A. A survey of indoor location technologies, techniques and applications in industry. Internet Things 2022, 20, 100608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Song, Y.; Yu, F.R.; Zhou, L.; Yang, X.; He, Z. Applications of the Internet of Things (IoT) in smart logistics: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Internet Things J. 2020, 8, 4250–4274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Lv, Z.; Lou, R.; Li, J.; Singh, A.K.; Song, H. Big data analytics for 6G-enabled massive Internet of Things. IEEE Internet Things J. 2021, 8, 5350–5359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Miles, B.; Bourennane, E.B.; Boucherkha, S.; Chikhi, S. A study of LoRaWAN protocol performance for IoT applications in smart agriculture. Comput. Commun. 2020, 164, 148–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Mohan, T.R.; Roselyn, J.P.; Uthra, R.A.; Devaraj, D.; Umachandran, K. Intelligent machine learning based total productive maintenance approach for achieving zero downtime in industrial machinery. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2021, 157, 107267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Soori, M.; Arezoo, B.; Dastres, R. Internet of Things for smart factories in industry 4.0, a review. Internet Things Cyber-Phys. Syst. 2023, 3, 192–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Erhan, L.; Ndubuaku, M.; Di Mauro, M.; Song, W.; Chen, M.; Fortino; Liotta, A. Smart anomaly detection in sensor systems: A multi-perspective review. Inf. Fusion 2021, 67, 64–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Thamilarasu, G.; Odesile, A.; Hoang, A. An intrusion detection system for internet of medical things. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 181560–181576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Bauwens, J.; Ruckebusch, P.; Giannoulis, S.; Moerman, I.; De Poorter, E. Over-the-air software updates in the Internet of Things: An overview of key principles. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2020, 58, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Mugarza, I.; Flores, J.L.; Montero, J.L. Security issues and software updates management in the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) era. Sensors 2020, 20, 7160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Tavana, M.; Hajipour, V.; Oveisi, S. IoT-based enterprise resource planning: Challenges, open issues, applications, architecture, and future research directions. Internet Things 2020, 11, 100262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Farahani, B.; Firouzi, F.; Luecking, M. The convergence of IoT and distributed ledger technologies (DLT): Opportunities, challenges, and solutions. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 2021, 177, 102936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Del Rio DD, F.; Sovacool, B.K.; Bergman, N.; Makuch, K.E. Critically reviewing smart home technology applications and business models in Europe. Energy Policy 2020, 144, 111631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Li, W.; Yigitcanlar, T.; Erol, I.; Liu, A. Motivations, barriers and risks of smart home adoption: From systematic literature review to conceptual framework. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2021, 80, 102211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Sharma, B.; Obaidat, M.S. Comparative analysis of IoT based products, technology and integration of IoT with cloud computing. IET Netw. 2020, 9, 43–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Hamdan, S.; Ayyash, M.; Almajali, S. Edge-computing architectures for Internet of Things applications: A survey. Sensors 2020, 20, 6441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Kumar, R.; Agrawal, N. Analysis of multi-dimensional Industrial IoT (IIoT) data in Edge-Fog-Cloud based architectural frameworks: A survey on current state and research challenges. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 2023, 35, 100504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Mrozek, D.; Koczur, A.; Małysiak-Mrozek, B. Fall detection in older adults with mobile IoT devices and machine learning in the cloud and on the edge. Inf. Sci. 2020, 537, 132–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Zdravevski, E.; Lameski, P.; Apanowicz, C.; Ślȩzak, D. From Big Data to business analytics: The case study of churn prediction. Appl. Soft Comput. 2020, 90, 106164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Mukherjee, S.; Gupta, S.; Rawlley, O.; Jain, S. Leveraging big data analytics in 5G-enabled IoT and industrial IoT for the development of sustainable smart cities. Trans. Emerg. Telecommun. Technol. 2022, 33, e4618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Rahmani, A.M.; Babaei, Z.; Souri, A. Event-driven IoT architecture for data analysis of reliable healthcare application using complex event processing. Clust. Comput. 2021, 24, 1347–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Wolf, K.; Dawson, R.J.; Mills, J.P.; Blythe, P.; Morley, J. Towards a digital twin for supporting multi-agency incident management in a smart city. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 16221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Krishnamurthi, R.; Kumar, A.; Gopinathan, D.; Nayyar, A.; Qureshi, B. An overview of IoT sensor data processing, fusion, and analysis techniques. Sensors 2020, 20, 6076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Li, C. Information processing in Internet of Things using big data analytics. Comput. Commun. 2020, 160, 718–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Ahmed, Z.; Mohamed, K.; Zeeshan, S.; Dong, X. Artificial intelligence with multi-functional machine learning platform development for better healthcare and precision medicine. Database 2020, 2020, baaa010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Lazaroiu, G.; Androniceanu, A.; Grecu, I.; Grecu, G.; Neguriță, O. Artificial intelligence-based decision-making algorithms, Internet of Things sensing networks, and sustainable cyber-physical management systems in big data-driven cognitive manufacturing. Oeconomia Copernic. 2022, 13, 1047–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Hashem, I.A.T.; Yaqoob, I.; Anuar, N.B.; Mokhtar, S.; Gani, A.; Khan, S.U. The rise of “big data” on cloud computing: Review and open research issues. Inf. Syst. 2015, 47, 98–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Shao, C.; Yang, Y.; Juneja, S.; GSeetharam, T. IoT data visualization for business intelligence in corporate finance. Inf. Process. Manag. 2022, 59, 102736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Salaht, F.A.; Desprez, F.; Lebre, A. An overview of service placement problem in fog and edge computing. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 2020, 53, 1–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Carvalho, G.; Cabral, B.; Pereira, V.; Bernardino, J. Edge computing: Current trends, research challenges and future directions. Computing 2021, 103, 993–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. De Donno, M.; Tange, K.; Dragoni, N. Foundations and evolution of modern computing paradigms: Cloud, IoT, Edge, and Fog. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 150936–150948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Karie, N.M.; Sahri, N.M.; Yang, W.; Valli, C.; Kebande, V.R. A review of security standards and frameworks for IoT-based smart environments. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 121975–121995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Sun, N.; Li, C.-T.; Chan, H.; Le, B.D.; Islam, Z.; Zhang, L.Y.; Islam, R.; Armstrong, W. Defining security requirements with the common criteria: Applications, adoptions, and challenges. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 44756–44777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Paiva, S.; Ahad, M.A.; Tripathi, G.; Feroz, N.; Casalino, G. Enabling technologies for urban smart mobility: Recent trends, opportunities and challenges. Sensors 2021, 21, 2143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Rahim, M.A.; Rahman, M.A.; Rahman, M.M.; Asyhari, A.T.; Bhuiyan MZ, A.; Ramasamy, D. Evolution of IoT-enabled connectivity and applications in automotive industry: A review. Veh. Commun. 2021, 27, 100285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Mavromatis, A.; Colman-Meixner, C.; Silva, A.P.; Vasilakos, X.; Nejabati, R.; Simeonidou, D. A software-defined IoT device management framework for edge and cloud computing. IEEE Internet Things J. 2019, 7, 1718–1735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. James, A.T.; Kumar, G.; Tayal, P.; Chauhan, A.; Wadhawa, C.; Panchal, J. Analysis of human resource management challenges in implementation of industry 4.0 in Indian automobile industry. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2022, 176, 121483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Chowdhury, N.R.; Paul, S.K.; Sarker, T.; Shi, Y. Implementing smart waste management system for a sustainable circular economy in the textile industry. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2023, 262, 108876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Centobelli, P.; Cerchione, R.; Chiaroni, D.; Del Vecchio, P.; Urbinati, A. Designing business models in circular economy: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2020, 29, 1734–1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Xing, L. Reliability in Internet of Things: Current status and future perspectives. IEEE Internet Things J. 2020, 7, 6704–6721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Berger, C.; Eichhammer, P.; Reiser, H.P.; Domaschka, J.; Hauck, F.J.; Habiger, G. A survey on resilience in the IoT: Taxonomy, classification, and discussion of resilience mechanisms. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 2021, 54, 1–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Song, J.; Zhang, P.; Alkubati, M.; Bao, Y.; Yu, G. Research advances on blockchain-as-a-service: Architectures, applications and challenges. Digit. Commun. Netw. 2022, 8, 466–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Kristiani, E.; Yang, C.T.; Huang, C.Y.; Ko, P.C.; Fathoni, H. On construction of sensors, edge, and cloud (ISEC) framework for smart system integration and applications. IEEE Internet Things J. 2020, 8, 309–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Barros, M.V.; Salvador, R.; de Francisco, A.C.; Piekarski, C.M. Mapping of research lines on circular economy practices in agriculture: From waste to energy. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 131, 109958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Werning, J.P.; Spinler, S. Transition to circular economy on firm level: Barrier identification and prioritization along the value chain. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 245, 118609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Mboli, J.S.; Thakker, D.; Mishra, J.L. An Internet of Things-enabled decision support system for circular economy business model. Softw. Pract. Exp. 2022, 52, 772–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Jäger-Roschko, M.; Petersen, M. Advancing the circular economy through information sharing: A systematic literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 369, 133210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Chavez, R.; Malik, M.; Ghaderi, H.; Yu, W. Environmental collaboration with suppliers and cost performance: Exploring the contingency role of digital orientation from a circular economy perspective. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2023, 43, 651–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Hallioui, A.; Herrou, B.; Santos, R.S.; Katina, P.F.; Egbue, O. Systems-based approach to contemporary business management: An enabler of business sustainability in a context of industry 4.0, circular economy, competitiveness and diverse stakeholders. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 373, 133819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Gaiardelli, P.; Pezzotta, G.; Rondini, A.; Romero, D.; Jarrahi, F.; Bertoni, M.; Wiesner, S.; Wuest, T.; Larsson, T.; Zaki, M.; et al. Product-service systems evolution in the era of Industry 4.0. Serv. Bus. 2021, 15, 177–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Cui, Y.; Liu, W.; Rani, P.; Alrasheedi, M. Internet of Things (IoT) adoption barriers for the circular economy using Pythagorean fuzzy SWARA-CoCoSo decision-making approach in the manufacturing sector. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2021, 171, 120951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Nain, G.; Pattanaik, K.K.; Sharma, G.K. Towards edge computing in intelligent manufacturing: Past, present and future. J. Manuf. Syst. 2022, 62, 588–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Liu, Y.; Peng, M.; Shou, G.; Chen, Y.; Chen, S. Toward edge intelligence: Multiaccess edge computing for 5G and Internet of Things. IEEE Internet Things J. 2020, 7, 6722–6747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Fraga-Lamas, P.; Lopes, S.I.; Fernández-Caramés, T.M. Green IoT and edge AI as key technological enablers for a sustainable digital transition towards a smart circular economy: An industry 5.0 use case. Sensors 2021, 21, 5745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Jahanbakht, M.; Xiang, W.; Hanzo, L.; Azghadi, M.R. Internet of underwater things and big marine data analytics—A comprehensive survey. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2021, 23, 904–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Rizi MH, P.; Seno SA, H. A systematic review of technologies and solutions to improve security and privacy protection of citizens in the smart city. Internet Things 2022, 20, 100584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Khan, I.S.; Ahmad, M.O.; Majava, J. Industry 4.0 and sustainable development: A systematic mapping of triple bottom line, Circular Economy and Sustainable Business Models perspectives. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 297, 126655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Ranjbari, M.; Esfandabadi, Z.S.; Ferraris, A.; Quatraro, F.; Rehan, M.; Nizami, A.-S.; Gupta, V.K.; Lam, S.S.; Aghbashlo, M.; Tabatabaei, M. Biofuel supply chain management in the circular economy transition: An inclusive knowledge map of the field. Chemosphere 2022, 296, 133968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Kumar, P.; Singh, R.K.; Kumar, V. Managing supply chains for sustainable operations in the era of industry 4.0 and circular economy: Analysis of barriers. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2021, 164, 105215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Javed, A.R.; Shahzad, F.; ur Rehman, S.; Zikria, Y.B.; Razzak, I.; Jalil, Z.; Xu, G. Future smart cities: Requirements, emerging technologies, applications, challenges, and future aspects. Cities 2022, 129, 103794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Bhuiyan, E.A.; Hossain, M.Z.; Muyeen, S.M.; Fahim, S.R.; Sarker, S.K.; Das, S.K. Towards next generation virtual power plant: Technology review and frameworks. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 150, 111358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Mehmood, M.Y.; Oad, A.; Abrar, M.; Munir, H.M.; Hasan, S.F.; Muqeet HA, U.; Golilarz, N.A. Edge computing for IoT-enabled smart grid. Secur. Commun. Netw. 2021, 5524025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Rao, P.M.; Deebak, B.D. Security and privacy issues in smart cities/industries: Technologies, applications, and challenges. J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 2023, 14, 10517–10553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Botín-Sanabria, D.M.; Mihaita, A.S.; Peimbert-García, R.E.; Ramírez-Moreno, M.A.; Ramírez-Mendoza, R.A.; Lozoya-Santos, J.D.J. Digital twin technology challenges and applications: A comprehensive review. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Li, J.; Dai, J.; Issakhov, A.; Almojil, S.F.; Souri, A. Towards decision support systems for energy management in the smart industry and Internet of Things. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2021, 161, 107671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Khan, F.; Ali, Y. A facilitating framework for a developing country to adopt smart waste management in the context of circular economy. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 26336–26351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Escolar, S.; Villanueva, F.J.; Santofimia, M.J.; Villa, D.; del Toro, X.; López, J.C. A Multiple-Attribute Decision Making-based approach for smart city rankings design. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2019, 142, 42–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Shammar, E.A.; Zahary, A.T. The Internet of Things (IoT): A survey of techniques, operating systems, and trends. Libr. Hi Tech 2020, 38, 5–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Ray, P.P.; Kumar, N. SDN/NFV architectures for edge-cloud oriented IoT: A systematic review. Comput. Commun. 2021, 169, 129–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Chen, X. Machine learning approach for a circular economy with waste recycling in smart cities. Energy Rep. 2022, 8, 3127–3140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Krishankumar, R.; Ecer, F. Selection of IoT service provider for sustainable transport using q-rung orthopair fuzzy CRADIS and unknown weights. Appl. Soft Comput. 2023, 132, 109870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Mistry, I.; Tanwar, S.; Tyagi, S.; Kumar, N. Blockchain for 5G-enabled IoT for industrial automation: A systematic review, solutions, and challenges. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2020, 135, 106382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Demestichas, K.; Daskalakis, E. Information and communication technology solutions for the circular economy. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Xu, X.; He, C.; Xu, Z.; Qi, L.; Wan, S.; Bhuiyan, M.Z.A. Joint optimization of offloading utility and privacy for edge computing enabled IoT. IEEE Internet Things J. 2019, 7, 2622–2629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Talebkhah, M.; Sali, A.; Marjani, M.; Gordan, M.; Hashim, S.J.; Rokhani, F.Z. IoT and big data applications in smart cities: Recent advances, challenges, and critical issues. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 55465–55484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Khalil, R.A.; Saeed, N.; Masood, M.; Fard, Y.M.; Alouini, M.S.; Al-Naffouri, T.Y. Deep learning in the Industrial Internet of Things: Potentials, challenges, and emerging applications. IEEE Internet Things J. 2021, 8, 11016–11040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Albreem, M.A.; Sheikh, A.M.; Alsharif, M.H.; Jusoh, M.; Yasin, M.N.M. Green Internet of Things (GIoT): Applications, practices, awareness, and challenges. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 38833–38858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Farahzadi, A.; Shams, P.; Rezazadeh, J.; Farahbakhsh, R. Middleware technologies for cloud of things: A survey. Digit. Commun. Netw. 2018, 4, 176–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Liu, Y.; Dai, H.N.; Wang, Q.; Shukla, M.K.; Imran, M. Unmanned aerial vehicle for internet of everything: Opportunities and challenges. Comput. Commun. 2020, 155, 66–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Bhat, J.R.; Alqahtani, S.A. 6G ecosystem: Current status and future perspective. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 43134–43167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Perera, C.; Qin, Y.; Estrella, J.C.; Reiff-Marganiec, S.; Vasilakos, A.V. Fog computing for sustainable smart cities: A survey. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 2017, 50, 1–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Kubiak, K.; Dec, G.; Stadnicka, D. Possible Applications of Edge Computing in the Manufacturing Industry—Systematic Literature Review. Sensors 2022, 22, 2445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  217. Taneja, M.; Byabazaire, J.; Jalodia, N.; Davy, A.; Olariu, C.; Malone, P. Machine learning based fog computing assisted data-driven approach for early lameness detection in dairy cattle. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2020, 171, 105286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Min, H. Developing a smart port architecture and essential elements in the era of Industry 4.0. Marit. Econ. Logist. 2022, 24, 189–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Diez-Olivan, A.; Del Ser, J.; Galar, D.; Sierra, B. Data fusion and machine learning for industrial prognosis: Trends and perspectives towards Industry 4.0. Inf. Fusion 2019, 50, 92–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Malik, P.K.; Sharma, R.; Singh, R.; Gehlot, A.; Satapathy, S.C.; Alnumay, W.S.; Pelusi, D.; Ghosh, U.; Nayak, J. Industrial Internet of Things and its applications in industry 4.0: State of the art. Comput. Commun. 2021, 166, 125–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Dang, L.M.; Piran, M.J.; Han, D.; Min, K.; Moon, H. A survey on Internet of Things and cloud computing for healthcare. Electronics 2019, 8, 768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Sun, L.; Xue, G.; Yu, R. TAFS: A truthful auction for IoT application offloading in fog computing networks. IEEE Internet Things J. 2022, 10, 3252–3263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Javadzadeh, G.; Rahmani, A.M. Fog computing applications in smart cities: A systematic survey. Wirel. Netw. 2020, 26, 1433–1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Rathore, S.; Park, J.H.; Chang, H. Deep learning and blockchain-empowered security framework for intelligent 5G-enabled IoT. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 90075–90083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Yilmaz, A.; Dora, M.; Hezarkhani, B.; Kumar, M. Lean and Industry 4.0: Mapping determinants and barriers from a social, environmental, and operational perspective. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2022, 175, 121320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Paes, L.A.B.; Bezerra, B.S.; Deus, R.M.; Jugend, D.; Battistelle, R.A.G. Organic solid waste management in a circular economy perspective–A systematic review and SWOT analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 239, 118086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Himeur, Y.; Elnour, M.; Fadli, F.; Meskin, N.; Petri, I.; Rezgui, Y.; Bensaali, F.; Amira, A. AI-big data analytics for building automation and management systems: A survey, actual challenges and future perspectives. Artif. Intell. Rev. 2023, 56, 4929–5021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Ahmad, T.; Zhu, H.; Zhang, D.; Tariq, R.; Bassam, A.; Ullah, F.; AlGhamdi, A.S.; Alshamrani, S.S. Energetics Systems and artificial intelligence: Applications of industry 4.0. Energy Rep. 2022, 8, 334–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Yontar, E. Critical success factor analysis of blockchain technology in agri-food supply chain management: A circular economy perspective. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 330, 117173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Ghobakhloo, M. Industry 4.0, digitization, and opportunities for sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 252, 119869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Falcone, P.M. Tourism-based circular economy in Salento (South Italy): A SWOT-ANP analysis. Soc. Sci. 2019, 8, 216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Frank, A.G.; Dalenogare, L.S.; Ayala, N.F. Industry 4.0 technologies: Implementation patterns in manufacturing companies. International J. Prod. Econ. 2019, 210, 15–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Palomares, I.; Martínez-Cámara, E.; Montes, R.; García-Moral, P.; Chiachio, M.; Chiachio, J.; Alonso, S.; Melero, F.J.; Molina, D.; Fernández, B.; et al. A panoramic view and SWOT analysis of artificial intelligence for achieving the sustainable development goals by 2030: Progress and prospects. Appl. Intell. 2021, 51, 6497–6527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Maraveas, C.; Piromalis, D.; Arvanitis, K.G.; Bartzanas, T.; Loukatos, D. Applications of IoT for optimized greenhouse environment and resources management. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2022, 198, 106993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Sanjeevi, P.; Prasanna, S.; Siva Kumar, B.; Gunasekaran, G.; Alagiri, I.; Vijay Anand, R. Precision agriculture and farming using Internet of Things based on wireless sensor network. Trans. Emerg. Telecommun. Technol. 2020, 31, e3978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Rehman, A.; Saba, T.; Kashif, M.; Fati, S.M.; Bahaj, S.A.; Chaudhry, H. A revisit of Internet of Things technologies for monitoring and control strategies in smart agriculture. Agronomy 2022, 12, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Kashyap, P.K.; Kumar, S.; Jaiswal, A.; Prasad, M.; Gandomi, A.H. Towards precision agriculture: IoT-enabled intelligent irrigation systems using deep learning neural network. IEEE Sens. J. 2021, 21, 17479–17491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Placidi, P.; Morbidelli, R.; Fortunati, D.; Papini, N.; Gobbi, F.; Scorzoni, A. Monitoring soil and ambient parameters in the IoT precision agriculture scenario: An original modeling approach dedicated to low-cost soil water content sensors. Sensors 2021, 21, 5110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Liu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Ren, S.; Yang, M.; Wang, Y.; Huisingh, D. How can smart technologies contribute to sustainable product lifecycle management? J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 249, 119423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Ertz, M.; Sun, S.; Boily, E.; Kubiat, P.; Quenum, G.G.Y. How transitioning to Industry 4.0 promotes circular product lifetimes. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2022, 101, 125–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Magrini, C.; Nicolas, J.; Berg, H.; Bellini, A.; Paolini, E.; Vincenti, N.; Campadello, L.; Bonoli, A. Using Internet of Things and distributed ledger technology for digital circular economy enablement: The case of electronic equipment. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Han, Y.; Shevchenko, T.; Yannou, B.; Ranjbari, M.; Esfandabadi, Z.S.; Saidani, M.; Bouillass, G.; Bliumska-Danko, K.; Li, G. Exploring how digital technologies enable a circular economy of products. Sustainability 2023, 15, 2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Awan, U.; Shamim, S.; Khan, Z.; Zia, N.U.; Shariq, S.M.; Khan, M.N. Big data analytics capability and decision-making: The role of data-driven insight on circular economy performance. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2021, 168, 120766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  244. Diène, B.; Rodrigues, J.J.; Diallo, O.; Ndoye, E.H.M.; Korotaev, V.V. Data management techniques for Internet of Things. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2020, 138, 106564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  245. Dong, J.; Meng, W.; Liu, Y.; Ti, J. A framework of pavement management system based on IoT and big data. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2021, 47, 101226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. Gernsheimer, O.; Gast, J.; Kanbach, D.K. Always on par? How small- and medium-sized enterprises manage coopetition strategies to innovate with large firms. Int. Small Bus. J. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Tawalbeh, L.A.; Muheidat, F.; Tawalbeh, M.; Quwaider, M. IoT Privacy and security: Challenges and solutions. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 4102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. Chanal, P.M.; Kakkasageri, M.S. Security and privacy in IoT: A survey. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 2020, 115, 1667–1693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. Chauhan, C.; Parida, V.; Dhir, A. Linking circular economy and digitalisation technologies: A systematic literature review of past achievements and future promises. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2022, 177, 121508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. Bertassini, A.C.; Ometto, A.R.; Severengiz, S.; Gerolamo, M.C. Circular economy and sustainability: The role of organizational behaviour in the transition journey. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2021, 30, 3160–3193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Hazra, A.; Adhikari, M.; Amgoth, T.; Srirama, S.N. A comprehensive survey on interoperability for IIoT: Taxonomy, standards, and future directions. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 2021, 55, 1–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  252. Boyer, R.H.W.; Mellquist, A.; Williander, M.; Fallahi, S.; Nyström, T.; Linder, M.; Algurén, P.; Vanacore, E.; Hunka, A.D.; Rex, E.; et al. Three-dimensional product circularity. J. Ind. Ecol. 2021, 25, 824–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  253. van Eechoud, T.; Ganzaroli, A. Exploring the role of dynamic capabilities in digital circular business model innovation: Results from a grounded systematic inductive analysis of 7 case studies. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 401, 136665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  254. Sjödin, D.; Parida, V.; Kohtamäki, M. Artificial intelligence enabling circular business model innovation in digital servitization: Conceptualizing dynamic capabilities, AI capacities, business models and effects. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2023, 197, 122903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  255. Santa-Maria, T.; Vermeulen, W.J.; Baumgartner, R.J. How do incumbent firms innovate their business models for the circular economy? Identifying micro-foundations of dynamic capabilities. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2022, 31, 1308–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  256. Liu, L.; Song, W.; Liu, Y. Leveraging digital capabilities toward a circular economy: Reinforcing sustainable supply chain management with Industry 4.0 technologies. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2023, 178, 109113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Ghosh, S.; Hughes, M.; Hodgkinson, I.; Hughes, P. Digital transformation of industrial businesses: A dynamic capability approach. Technovation 2022, 113, 102414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. Taddei, E.; Sassanelli, C.; Rosa, P.; Terzi, S. Circular supply chains in the era of Industry 4.0: A systematic literature review. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2022, 170, 108268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Rusch, M.; Schöggl, J.P.; Baumgartner, R.J. Application of digital technologies for sustainable product management in a circular economy: A review. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2023, 32, 1159–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  260. Bag, S.; Rahman, M.S. The role of capabilities in shaping sustainable supply chain flexibility and enhancing circular economy-target performance: An empirical study. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2023, 28, 162–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  261. Dantas, T.E.T.; de-Souza, E.D.; Destro, I.R.; Hammes, G.; Rodriguez, C.M.T.; Soares, S.R. How the combination of Circular Economy and Industry 4.0 can contribute towards achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2021, 26, 213–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  262. Andronie, M.; Lăzăroiu, G.; Iatagan, M.; Hurloiu, I.; Dijmărescu, I. Sustainable cyber-physical production systems in big data-driven smart urban economy: A systematic literature review. Sustainability 2021, 13, 751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  263. de Oliveira Neto, G.C.; da Conceição Silva, A.; Filho, M.G. How can Industry 4.0 technologies and circular economy help companies and researchers collaborate and accelerate the transition to strong sustainability? A bibliometric review and a systematic literature review. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 20, 3483–3520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  264. Awan, U.; Sroufe, R.; Shahbaz, M. Industry 4.0 and the circular economy: A literature review and recommendations for future research. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2021, 30, 2038–2060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  265. Ciliberto, C.; Szopik-Depczyńska, K.; Tarczyńska-Łuniewska, M.; Ruggieri, A.; Ioppolo, G. Enabling the Circular Economy transition: A sustainable lean manufacturing recipe for Industry 4.0. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2021, 30, 3255–3272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  266. Agrawal, R.; Wankhede, V.A.; Kumar, A.; Luthra, S.; Huisingh, D. Progress and trends in integrating Industry 4.0 within Circular Economy: A comprehensive literature review and future research propositions. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2022, 31, 559–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  267. Bag, S.; Pretorius, J.H.C. Relationships between industry 4.0, sustainable manufacturing and circular economy: Proposal of a research framework. Int. J. Organ. Anal. 2022, 30, 864–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  268. Raji, M.A.; Olodo, H.B.; Oke, T.T.; Addy, W.A.; Ofodile, O.C.; Oyewole, A.T. Real-time data analytics in retail: A review of USA and global practices. GSC Adv. Res. Rev. 2024, 18, 059–065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  269. Neethirajan, S. Artificial intelligence and sensor technologies in dairy livestock export: Charting a digital transformation. Sensors 2023, 23, 7045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  270. Sima, V.; Gheorghe, I.G.; Subić, J.; Nancu, D. Influences of the industry 4.0 revolution on the human capital development and consumer behavior: A systematic review. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  271. Allioui, H.; Mourdi, Y. Exploring the full potentials of IoT for better financial growth and stability: A comprehensive survey. Sensors 2023, 23, 8015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  272. Xing, L. Cascading failures in Internet of Things: Review and perspectives on reliability and resilience. IEEE Internet Things J. 2020, 8, 44–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  273. Mishra, S.; Anderson, K.; Miller, B.; Boyer, K.; Warren, A. Microgrid resilience: A holistic approach for assessing threats, identifying vulnerabilities, and designing corresponding mitigation strategies. Appl. Energy 2020, 264, 114726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  274. Chiara, P.G. The IoT and the new EU cybersecurity regulatory landscape. Int. Rev. Law Comput. Technol. 2022, 36, 118–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  275. Oyewole, A.T.; Adeoye, O.B.; Addy, W.A.; Okoye, C.C.; Ofodile, O.C.; Ugochukwu, C.E. Automating financial reporting with natural language processing: A review and case analysis. World J. Adv. Res. Rev. 2024, 21, 575–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  276. Oláh, J.; Aburumman, N.; Popp, J.; Khan, M.A.; Haddad, H.; Kitukutha, N. Impact of Industry 4.0 on environmental sustainability. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Distribution of published articles by type (all years).
Table 1. Distribution of published articles by type (all years).
Articles by TypeNumber of Publications on
IoTCEIoT and CE
Highly cited papers110369818Mca 29 00049 i001
Hot papers23261
Review articles3775392250
Early access166986713
Open access39,17816,579131
Enriched cited references29,151707047
Open publisher-invited reviews27200
Table 2. Year-wise breakdown of published articles.
Table 2. Year-wise breakdown of published articles.
YearNumber of Publications on
IoTCEIoT and CE
202417479998Mca 29 00049 i002
202314,537653265
202218,281624958
202116,985528449
202015,397353726
201915,016232124
201811,41912476
201782707885
201650564801
201527422431
201413501700
20136651670
20125041550
20112441530
20101291530
2009571300
200852770
200730660
200620250
200514210
200416150
200311150
20021130
20011140
20001440
19995160
19981070
1997620
1996950
19951330
1994720
1993630
1992720
1991410
1990300
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Turskis, Z.; Šniokienė, V. IoT-Driven Transformation of Circular Economy Efficiency: An Overview. Math. Comput. Appl. 2024, 29, 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/mca29040049

AMA Style

Turskis Z, Šniokienė V. IoT-Driven Transformation of Circular Economy Efficiency: An Overview. Mathematical and Computational Applications. 2024; 29(4):49. https://doi.org/10.3390/mca29040049

Chicago/Turabian Style

Turskis, Zenonas, and Violeta Šniokienė. 2024. "IoT-Driven Transformation of Circular Economy Efficiency: An Overview" Mathematical and Computational Applications 29, no. 4: 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/mca29040049

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop