Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Next Article in Journal
13C NMR Dataset Qualitative Analysis of Grecian Wines
Previous Article in Journal
Non-Spatial Data towards Spatially Located News about COVID-19: A Semi-Automated Aggregator of Pandemic Data from (Social) Media within the Olomouc Region, Czechia
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Data Descriptor

Dataset of Nile Red Fluorescence Readings with Different Yeast Strains, Solvents, and Incubation Times

by
Mauricio Ramirez-Castrillon
1,2,*,
Victoria P. Jaramillo-Garcia
2,
Helio Lopes Barros
3,
João A. Pêgas Henriques
2,
Valter Stefani
3,† and
Patricia Valente
4
1
Research Group in Mycology (GIM/CICBA), Universidad Santiago de Cali, Calle 5 No. 62-00, Santiago de Cali, Colombia
2
Graduate Program in Cell and Molecular Biology, Biotechnology Center, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Av. Bento Gonçalves, 9500 Prédios 43421/43431 - Setor IV - Campus do Vale - CxP. 15005, Porto Alegre, RS CEP 91501-970, Brazil
3
New Organic Materials and Forensic Chemistry Laboratory (LNMO-QF), Institute of Chemistry, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Av. Bento Gonçalves, 9500, Campus do Vale - CxP. 15005, Porto Alegre, RS CEP 91501-970, Brazil
4
Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Rua Sarmento Leite, 500, Porto Alegre, RS CEP 90050-170, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
In Memoriam.
Submission received: 5 August 2020 / Revised: 19 August 2020 / Accepted: 20 August 2020 / Published: 1 September 2020

Abstract

:
We used Nile red to estimate lipid content in oleaginous yeasts using a high-throughput approach. We measured the fluorescence intensity of Nile red using different solvents, yeast strains, and incubation times in optimized excitation/emission wavelengths. The data show the relative fluorescence units (RFU) for Nile red excitation, using 1× PBS, 1× PBS and 5% v/v isopropyl alcohol, 50% v/v glycerol, culture medium A-gly broth, and A-gly broth supplemented with 5% v/v DMSO. In addition, we showed the RFU for the Nile red dye for different oleaginous and non-oleaginous yeast strains, such as Meyerozyma guilliermondii BI281A, Yarrowia lipolytica QU21 and Saccharomyces cerevisiae MRC164. Other measurements of lipid accumulation kinetics were shown for the above and additional yeast strains. These datasets provide the guidelines to obtain the optimal solvent system and the minimal interaction time for the Nile red dye to enter in the cells and obtain a stable readout.
Dataset License: CC-BY

1. Summary

Nile red (9-diethylamino-5H-benzo[α]phenoxazine-5-one) is one of the most commonly used dyes to quantify neutral lipids in yeasts [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Different protocols have been proposed to use this dye, but they are not fully standardized, particularly generating some questions about the incubation time (time delay between Nile red contact with cells and fluorescence measurement). For example, a rapid and inexpensive method for the selection of oleaginous strains out of a large collection of yeasts was based on Nile red fluorescence and a microplate reader equipment. In that case, a mixture of DMSO with culture media A (including the cells) was mixed with the Nile red dye, measuring the fluorescence kinetics for 20 min with 60-s intervals to detect the fluorescence peak [2]. Another methodology to stain yeast cells measured the fluorescence reads immediately after Nile red addition in the solution and recommended good practices in pipetting and mixing the yeast suspension in order to reduce variability in the readout [3]. Later in 2019, a method to stain oleaginous yeasts was proposed using 1× PBS or 20% acetone and proposed a time range of measurements between 5 and 30 min, keeping the samples in darkness [7]. The dataset included in the present work shows the fluorescence readings of Nile red dye using different yeast species, solvents and incubation times. The first part of the dataset reports the fluorescence reads for each variable against the incubation time. The second part shows the fluorescence readings at different incubation times, including several lipid-accumulation kinetics of different oleaginous yeasts. This dataset could be used to predict oleaginous microorganisms using mathematical modeling, to define if the oleaginous ability is species-specific or strain-specific. Additionally, it could help to determine the right incubation time or solvent for each strain, to compare the oleaginous ability of the strains used in this study with other strains.

2. Data Description

Table 1 shows all of the yeast strains included in the fluorescence reading dataset. M. guilliermondii BI281A [8], Y. lipolytica QU21 [9] and S. cerevisiae MRC164 [10] were used as the non-oleaginous reference yeast strains. Other strains were also included in the dataset, such as Papiliotrema flavescens BI282, BI283, BI296 and Vishniacozyma sp. BI237, determining their oleaginous character by gravimetric analysis.
In this dataset, we also assessed the fluorescence reading after different incubation times with Nile red dye diluted in five different solvents, including a mixture of some of them. Figure 1 shows the comparison of fluorescence readings of Y. lipolytica QU21 and S. cerevisiae MRC164, evaluating several solvents at different incubation times.
Figure 2 shows the fluorescence readings for different solvents and cell densities for M. guilliermondii BI281A. The background fluorescence readouts (solvent without cells) are also included.
Figure 3 shows different kinetics of lipid accumulation for other five yeast strains. For these data, we used A-gly broth as solvent. We measured the fluorescence readings at different times during the yeast growth curve and at different incubation times of Nile red. All the raw data regarding the Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3 are available in plain text (txt format). The corrected dataset is available in spreadsheet format.
We included some secondary data about stability of Nile red in the dataset. Figure 4 shows the consecutive measurement ratio (CMR) for the different fluorescence readings obtained in the raw data. For example, Figure 4A shows the CMR for different solvents in the absence of cells, while Figure 4B,C shows the CMR values for fluorescence readings in presence of M. guilliermondii BI281A or Y. lipolytica QU21, respectively.

3. Methods

The chemical reagents and solvents used were Nile red (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) dissolved in acetone (100 µg/mL); 1× PBS (137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 8 mM Na2HPO4, and 2 mM KH2PO4); 1× PBS with 5% v/v isopropyl alcohol; 50% Glycerol (v/v in distilled water); A-gly broth (1 g/L KH2PO4, 1 g/L (NH4)2SO4, 0.5 g/L MgCl2—6H2O and 15% v/v glycerol), and A-gly broth with 5% v/v Dimethyl Sulfoxide (DMSO).
The oleaginous yeasts Meyerozyma guilliermondii BI281A (deposited as UFMG-CM-Y6124 at Microorganisms Collection, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil) and Yarrowia lipolytica QU21 (UFMG-CM-Y327) were tested. Saccharomyces cerevisiae MRC164 was used as reference for a non-oleaginous yeast. Each strain was grown in YM broth (3 g/L yeast extract, 3 g/L malt extract, 5 g/L peptone, 10 g/L glucose) for 48 h at 28 °C in order to obtain metabolically active cells. After, each strain was transferred to 75 mL of A-gly broth in a 250 mL flask and grew it for 7, 8 or 12 days at 26 °C and 150 rpm.
The fluorescence readings were obtained with samples containing 150 μL of sample (solvent or cells suspended in each solvent). The solution was transferred to a black background flat bottom 96-well microplates (Jet Biofil, China), and the relative fluorescence was measured in a Perkin Elmer Enspire Multimode Plate Reader 2300 equipment (488 nm of excitation, 585 nm of emission). After measuring the basal fluorescence intensity in each well without the fluorescent dye (background fluorescence), we added 50 μL of Nile Red (final concentration: 25 µg/mL) to the solution, shaken for 5 min inside the equipment and measured the fluorescence in each well with the dye. The measurement was repeated after 5 min, followed by a kinetic reading every 10 min until 60 min. Each measurement was preceded by shaking for 5 s to suspend the cells. We repeated the experiment with different cell densities (for example, OD600nm = 1) with measurements at 10, 30, 60 and 90 min of incubation. The fluorescence reading was expressed as RFU (Relative Fluorescence Units), after subtraction of both the background fluorescence of the samples and the fluorescence of the solvent in the presence of Nile red (blank). Each sample had technical triplicates. The ratio of RFU between two consecutive measurements (RFUt + 1 (min)/RFUt (min)) was expressed as the consecutive measurement ratio (CMR), where values closer to 1 indicates low variation between the measurements in times t and t + 1. The gravimetric analysis of biomass and total lipids were performed as described elsewhere [8]. Table 2 shows how data were acquired, the parameters of data collection and data source location.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.V., V.S. and J.A.P.H.; methodology, M.R.-C., V.P.J.-G., H.L.B.; validation, M.R.-C.; data curation, P.V.; writing—original draft preparation, M.R.-C.; writing—review and editing, V.P.J.-G., H.L.B. and P.V.; funding acquisition, P.V. and M.R.-C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq, Brazil) [Grant numbers 304870/2013-7, 445207/2014-0, 201285/2015-0], Universidad Santiago de Cali (Colombia) [Grant number 934-621119-561], and Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnologia e Innovación MINCIENCIAS (Colombia) [Grant numbers 512, 784]. The APC was funded by Universidad Santiago de Cali.

Acknowledgments

We thank Luisa M. Nieto Ramirez for her assistance in English manuscript editing.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kimura, K.; Yamaoka, M.; Kamisaka, Y. Rapid estimation of lipids in oleaginous fungi and yeasts using Nile red fluorescence. J. Microbiol. Methods. 2004, 56, 331–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sitepu, I.R.; Garay, L.A.; Sestric, R.; Levin, D.; Block, D.E.; German, J.B.; Boundy-Mills, K.L. Oleaginous yeasts for biodiesel: Current and future trends in biology and production. Biotechnol. Adv. 2014, 32, 1336–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Rostron, K.A.; Lawrence, C.L. Nile red staining of neutral lipids in yeast. In Histochemistry of Single Molecules; Humana Press: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 219–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Patel, A.; Pruthi, V.; Pruthi, P.A. Innovative screening approach for the identification of triacylglycerol accumulating oleaginous strains. Renew. Energy 2019, 135, 936–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Miranda, C.; Bettencourt, S.; Pozdniakova, T.; Pereira, J.; Sampaio, P.; Franco-Duarte, R.; Pais, C. Modified high-throughput Nile red fluorescence assay for the rapid screening of oleaginous yeasts using acetic acid as carbon source. BMC Microbiol. 2020, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Balan, V. Microbial Lipid Production; Humana Press: New York, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 33–418. [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhao, C.; Luo, M.T.; Huang, C.; Chen, X.F.; Xiong, L.; Li, H.L.; Chen, X.D. Determining intracellular lipid content of different oleaginous yeasts by one simple and accurate Nile Red fluorescent method. Prep. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2019, 49, 597–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Ramírez-Castrillón, M.; Jaramillo-Garcia, V.P.; Rosa, P.D.; Landell, M.F.; Vu, D.; Fabricio, M.F.; Ayub, M.A.Z.; Robert, V.; Henriques, J.A.P.; Valente, P. The oleaginous yeast Meyerozyma guilliermondii BI281A as a new potential biodiesel feedstock: Selection and lipid production optimization. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Poli, J.S.; Rosa, P.D.; Senter, L.; Mendes, S.D.C.; Ramirez-Castrillon, M.; Vainstein, M.H.; Valente, P. Fatty acid methyl esters produced by oleaginous yeast Yarrowia lipolytica QU21: An alternative for vegetable oils. Rev. Bras. Bioci. 2013, 11, 203–208. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ramírez-Castrillón, M.; Mendes, S.D.; Inostroza-Ponta, M.; Valente, P. (GTG) 5 MSP-PCR fingerprinting as a technique for discrimination of wine associated yeasts? PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e105870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Landell, M.F.; Mautone, J.N.; Valente, P. Biodiversity of yeasts associated to bromeliads in Itapuã park, Viamão/RS. Biociências 2006, 14, 144–149. [Google Scholar]
  12. Gomes, F.F. Identificação molecular da comunidade de leveduras associadas a macrófitas aquáticas em uma região de marisma da Lagoa dos Patos (RS). Bachelor’s Thesis, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ramirez-Castrillon, M.; Gomes, F.F.; Souza, A.F.; Leite, B.R.; Pagani, D.M.; Valente, P. Papiliotrema maritimi f.a. sp. nov., a new tremellaceous yeast species associated to macrophytes in a Marshland of South Brazil. bioRxiv 2020. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Relative fluorescence units (RFU) for Y. lipolytica QU21 (A) and S. cerevisiae MRC164 (B), using different solvents against the incubation time. The cell concentration was standardized with an optical density (OD600nm) = 1.
Figure 1. Relative fluorescence units (RFU) for Y. lipolytica QU21 (A) and S. cerevisiae MRC164 (B), using different solvents against the incubation time. The cell concentration was standardized with an optical density (OD600nm) = 1.
Data 05 00077 g001
Figure 2. Relative fluorescence units for M. guilliermondii BI281A using different solvents and incubation time of Nile red. The cell concentration was standardized at optical densities (OD600nm) of 0.03 and 1.
Figure 2. Relative fluorescence units for M. guilliermondii BI281A using different solvents and incubation time of Nile red. The cell concentration was standardized at optical densities (OD600nm) of 0.03 and 1.
Data 05 00077 g002
Figure 3. Relative fluorescence units for different time of growth for several yeast strains, using A-gly broth as solvent, against the incubation time of Nile red. (A) Vishniacozyma sp. BI237, (B) P. flavescens BI283, (C) P. flavescens BI296, (D) P. flavescens BI282, (E) Occultifur sp. Bel41.
Figure 3. Relative fluorescence units for different time of growth for several yeast strains, using A-gly broth as solvent, against the incubation time of Nile red. (A) Vishniacozyma sp. BI237, (B) P. flavescens BI283, (C) P. flavescens BI296, (D) P. flavescens BI282, (E) Occultifur sp. Bel41.
Data 05 00077 g003
Figure 4. Consecutive measurement ratios (CMR) for Nile red. Estimated CMR between times were plotted sequentially for each solvent tested, in the absence of cells (A), with cells of M. guilliermondii BI281A (B) or Y. lipolytica QU21 (C). The black horizontal line represents a CMR of 1.0. Values are mean ± standard deviation (n = 3).
Figure 4. Consecutive measurement ratios (CMR) for Nile red. Estimated CMR between times were plotted sequentially for each solvent tested, in the absence of cells (A), with cells of M. guilliermondii BI281A (B) or Y. lipolytica QU21 (C). The black horizontal line represents a CMR of 1.0. Values are mean ± standard deviation (n = 3).
Data 05 00077 g004
Table 1. Yeast strains included in the dataset.
Table 1. Yeast strains included in the dataset.
StrainSpeciesSource of IsolationOleaginousReference
BI281AMeyerozyma guilliermondiiFlower Tilandsia gardneriYes[8]
QU21Yarrowia lipolyticaArtisanal cheeseYes[9]
MRC164Saccharomyces cerevisiaeRed wineNo[10]
BI283Papiliotrema flavescensBromelia antiacanthaYes[11]
BI296Aechmea recurvataYes
BI282Bromelia antiacanthaYes
BI091Flower of Tilandsia crocataND *
BI204Tilandsia gardneriND *
BI231Vriesea friburgensisNo
BI276Tilandsia gardneriND *
BI081Debaryomyces melissophilusTilandsia gardneriNo
BI089Sporidiobolus pararoseusFlower of Tilandsia crocataND *
BI237VishnIacozyma sp.Vriesea friburgensisYes
Bel41Occultifur sp.Bolboschoenus maritimusNo[12]
Bel107ND *
Bel82Sporidiobolus sp.ND *
Bel40Candida sp.ND *
Bel106Neophaeomoniella sp.ND *
Bel49Non identifiedND *
Bel46Papiliotrema maritimi sp. nov.No[12,13]
Bel88No
* ND = Non determined, the fluorescence readings showed high relative fluorescence units (RFU) values, but the oleaginous character was not confirmed by gravimetry.
Table 2. Parameters for data acquisition.
Table 2. Parameters for data acquisition.
ParameterDescription
Data acquisitionAll data were obtained with a spectrofluorometer (Perkin Elmer Enspire Multimode Plate Reader 2300 equipment). The optical density was measured in a 96-well test plate. The Fluorescence was measured in black background 96-well test plates (Jet Biofil, China). The data was exported by EnSpire Workstation version 3.00.
Data collection parametersVolume: Solvent with or without cells: 150 μL; Nile Red (50 mg/L): 50 μL. Final volume: 200 μL.
Incubation parameters: 5 min or 10 min with orbital shaking (60 rpm, 3 mm diameter)
Fluorescence reading: 488 nm of excitation, 585 nm of emission, 100 flashes by well.
Data source locationInstitution: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
City/Town/Region: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul
Country: Brazil
Latitude and longitude for collected data: 30°04′07.9″ S 51°07′10.9″ W

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ramirez-Castrillon, M.; Jaramillo-Garcia, V.P.; Barros, H.L.; Henriques, J.A.P.; Stefani, V.; Valente, P. Dataset of Nile Red Fluorescence Readings with Different Yeast Strains, Solvents, and Incubation Times. Data 2020, 5, 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/data5030077

AMA Style

Ramirez-Castrillon M, Jaramillo-Garcia VP, Barros HL, Henriques JAP, Stefani V, Valente P. Dataset of Nile Red Fluorescence Readings with Different Yeast Strains, Solvents, and Incubation Times. Data. 2020; 5(3):77. https://doi.org/10.3390/data5030077

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ramirez-Castrillon, Mauricio, Victoria P. Jaramillo-Garcia, Helio Lopes Barros, João A. Pêgas Henriques, Valter Stefani, and Patricia Valente. 2020. "Dataset of Nile Red Fluorescence Readings with Different Yeast Strains, Solvents, and Incubation Times" Data 5, no. 3: 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/data5030077

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop