Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (299)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = SBRT

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
7 pages, 212 KiB  
Communication
The Role of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) in Oligoprogressive Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) Treated with ICIs–TKIs: A Retrospective Multicentric Study
by Maria La Vecchia, Manuela Federico, Dario Aiello, Valentina Zagardo, Antonella Mazzonello, Lorella Testa, Leonarda La Paglia, Tiziana Bruno and Ivan Fazio
J. Pers. Med. 2024, 14(10), 1030; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14101030 (registering DOI) - 27 Sep 2024
Abstract
Background: This multicentric, retrospective study investigated the use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) who experienced oligoprogression during a combination therapy with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) and a tyrosine–kinase inhibitor (TKI). Methods: We retrospectively [...] Read more.
Background: This multicentric, retrospective study investigated the use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) who experienced oligoprogression during a combination therapy with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) and a tyrosine–kinase inhibitor (TKI). Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 34 pts affected by oligoprogressive RCC treated with an ICI–TKI combination between January 2020 and December 2023. SBRT was delivered to each site of oligoprogressive metastatic disease. After SBRT, pts were given follow-up clinical evaluations. 6–12–18-month local control (LC) rates and median next-line treatment-free survival (NEST-FS) were the primary endpoints. The secondary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefits and safety. Results: After a median follow-up of 24 months, 6–12–18-month LC rates were 100%, 71% and 43%, respectively, and the median NEST-FS was 20 months. ORR was 90%, while clinical benefit was 100%. No > G2 adverse events related to SBRT were recorded. Conclusions: In our study, SBRT for oligoprogressive mRCC turned out to be a safe and useful treatment which was able to preserve current treatment. Further prospective studies are necessary to explore the effects of the ICIs–TKIs combination and SBRT upon oligoprogressive sites in mRCC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer Immunotherapy: Current Advancements and Future Perspectives)
14 pages, 1500 KiB  
Systematic Review
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for the Treatment of Primary Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Agata Suleja, Mateusz Bilski, Ekaterina Laukhtina, Tamás Fazekas, Akihiro Matsukawa, Ichiro Tsuboi, Stefano Mancon, Robert Schulz, Timo F. W. Soeterik, Mikołaj Przydacz, Łukasz Nyk, Paweł Rajwa, Wojciech Majewski, Riccardo Campi, Shahrokh F. Shariat and Marcin Miszczyk
Cancers 2024, 16(19), 3276; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16193276 - 26 Sep 2024
Abstract
Context: Surgery is the gold standard for the local treatment of primary renal cell carcinoma (RCC), but alternatives are emerging. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the results of prospective studies using definitive stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to treat primary [...] Read more.
Context: Surgery is the gold standard for the local treatment of primary renal cell carcinoma (RCC), but alternatives are emerging. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the results of prospective studies using definitive stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to treat primary localised RCC. Evidence acquisition: This review was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023447274). We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar for reports of prospective studies published since 2003, describing the outcomes of SBRT for localised RCC. Meta-analyses were performed for local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and rates of adverse events (AEs) using generalised linear mixed models (GLMMs). Outcomes were presented as rates with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Risk-of-bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. Evidence synthesis: Of the 2983 records, 13 prospective studies (n = 308) were included in the meta-analysis. The median diameter of the irradiated tumours ranged between 1.9 and 5.5 cm in individual studies. Grade ≥ 3 AEs were reported in 15 patients, and their estimated rate was 0.03 (95%CI: 0.01–0.11; n = 291). One- and two-year LC rates were 0.98 (95%CI: 0.95–0.99; n = 293) and 0.97 (95%CI: 0.93–0.99; n = 253), while one- and two-year OS rates were 0.95 (95%CI: 0.88–0.98; n = 294) and 0.86 (95%CI: 0.77–0.91; n = 224). There was no statistically significant heterogeneity, and the estimations were consistent after excluding studies at a high risk of bias in a sensitivity analysis. Major limitations include a relatively short follow-up, inhomogeneous reporting of renal function deterioration, and a lack of prospective comparative evidence. Conclusions: The short-term results suggest that SBRT is a valuable treatment method for selected inoperable patients (or those who refuse surgery) with localised RCC associated with low rates of high-grade AEs and excellent LC. However, until the long-term data from randomised controlled trials are available, surgical management remains a standard of care in operable patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical and Translational Updates in Renal Cell Carcinoma)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 460 KiB  
Systematic Review
Oligometastatic Urothelial Cancer and Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: A Systematic Review and an Updated Insight of Current Evidence and Future Directions
by Antonio Angrisani, Davide Giovanni Bosetti, Ursula Maria Vogl, Francesco Mosè Castronovo and Thomas Zilli
Cancers 2024, 16(18), 3201; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16183201 - 20 Sep 2024
Abstract
Background: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is the most commonly used metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) for oligometastatic urothelial carcinoma (omUC). Despite efforts in defining this disease entity, open questions remain concerning the role of MDT and the use of biomarkers, imaging, and its combination [...] Read more.
Background: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is the most commonly used metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) for oligometastatic urothelial carcinoma (omUC). Despite efforts in defining this disease entity, open questions remain concerning the role of MDT and the use of biomarkers, imaging, and its combination with systemic therapies. The aim of the present systematic review is to provide an updated overview of the current clinical evidence on SBRT for omUC in terms of survival and local control benefits. We also aim to provide updates on controversial areas and future directions in this emerging field. Methods: With a systematic approach, following PRISMA recommendations, we searched two databases to identify and select articles published up until March 2024 reporting the use of SBRT for omUC with or without concomitant systemic therapies. Prospective randomized or non-randomized studies as well as retrospective studies were included. Results: Eight studies were selected for data extraction and 293 omUC patients treated with SBRT were collectively analyzed. In metachronous omUC patients, SBRT delivered with ablative doses (BED10 ≥ 78 Gy) was associated with a 2-year overall survival (OS) rate of 50.7% (95% CI 35.1–64.4%). The use of sub-ablative SBRT doses (BED10 = 43.2 Gy) in combination with immunotherapy did not demonstrate significant clinical outcome improvement in two prospective studies. The overall tolerance was good, with only one study reporting toxicity of grade 3 in up to 18% of the patients treated with SBRT in combination with immunotherapy. Conclusions: SBRT is an effective and widely available MDT option in omUC, although this is based on a limited number of studies. Despite the attempt to use SBRT as an immune response trigger in combination with immunotherapy, no significant improvement in survival outcomes has been observed. The integration of new systemic agents with MDT will likely define a new scenario for the treatment of omUC. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO, ID: CRD42024522381. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1540 KiB  
Article
Adrenal Insufficiency following Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SAbR) of Adrenal Gland Metastases
by Oksana Hamidi, Mihailo Miljanic, Gayane Tumyan, Alana Christie, Sasan Mirfakhraee, Sadia Ali, Michael Dohopolski, Sujana Gottumukkala, James Brugarolas, Robert Timmerman and Raquibul Hannan
Cancers 2024, 16(18), 3140; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16183140 - 12 Sep 2024
Abstract
Background: Adrenal metastases are often treated with stereotactic ablative radiation (SAbR). We aimed to assess the incidence, timing, and factors associated with the development of primary adrenal insufficiency (PAI) following SAbR. Methods: A retrospective cohort study comprised 66 consecutive patients (73% men, median [...] Read more.
Background: Adrenal metastases are often treated with stereotactic ablative radiation (SAbR). We aimed to assess the incidence, timing, and factors associated with the development of primary adrenal insufficiency (PAI) following SAbR. Methods: A retrospective cohort study comprised 66 consecutive patients (73% men, median age 61 years) who underwent SAbR for adrenal metastasis. Results: The series encompassed metastases from renal cell carcinoma (41%), lung tumors (38%), colorectal adenocarcinoma (9%), melanoma (5%), and others (7%). Median follow-up was 17 months from SAbR. Nine (14%) patients developed PAI at a median of 4.3 months (range, 0.7–20.2). The incidence of PAI was 44% in patients with prior adrenalectomy receiving unilateral SAbR, 44% with bilateral SAbR, 2% with unaffected contralateral gland, and 0% with bilateral metastases treated with unilateral SAbR. PAI was associated with prior adrenalectomy (odds ratio [OR] 32) and bilateral SAbR (OR 8.2), but not age, sex, metastasis size, or biological effective dose. Post-SAbR 6-month and 1-year local control rates were 82% and 75%, respectively. Conclusions: Patients undergoing SAbR for adrenal metastasis are at high risk of developing PAI. PAI is associated with bilateral SAbR and contralateral adrenalectomy. PAI is unlikely with a remaining unaffected adrenal gland or in the setting of bilateral adrenal metastases with unilateral SAbR. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Metastasis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 282 KiB  
Review
Palliative Thoracic Radiotherapy in the Era of Modern Cancer Care for NSCLC
by Lucyna Kępka
Cancers 2024, 16(17), 3018; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16173018 - 29 Aug 2024
Viewed by 244
Abstract
Palliative thoracic radiotherapy provides rapid and effective symptom relief in approximately two-thirds of NSCLC patients treated. In patients with poor performance status, the degree of palliation appears unrelated to the radiation dose or fractionation schedule. Conversely, in patients with good performance status, higher [...] Read more.
Palliative thoracic radiotherapy provides rapid and effective symptom relief in approximately two-thirds of NSCLC patients treated. In patients with poor performance status, the degree of palliation appears unrelated to the radiation dose or fractionation schedule. Conversely, in patients with good performance status, higher radiation doses administered over longer periods have shown modest survival benefits. These findings stem from studies conducted before the advent of immunotherapy and targeted therapy in clinical practice. Currently, there are no large prospective studies specifically dedicated to palliative radiotherapy conducted in this new treatment era. Modern radiotherapy technologies are now widely available and are increasingly used for palliative purposes in selected patients, reflecting the expanded array of therapeutic options for disseminated NSCLC and improved prognosis. Some traditional tenets of palliative thoracic radiotherapy, such as the improvement of overall survival with a protracted radiation schedule and the use of simple, cost-effective radiation techniques for palliative purposes, may no longer hold true for patients receiving immunotherapy or targeted therapy. The application of IMRT or SBRT in the context of palliative radiotherapy for NSCLC is not yet sufficiently explored, and this is addressed in this review. Moreover, new risks associated with combining palliative radiotherapy with these systemic treatments are being explored and are discussed within the context of palliative care. The optimal timing, doses, fractionation schedules, and treatment volumes for radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy or targeted therapy are currently subjects of investigation. In emergencies, radiotherapy should be used as a life-saving measure without delay. However, for other indications of palliative thoracic radiotherapy, decisions regarding doses, timing relative to systemic treatments, and treatment volumes should be made in a multidisciplinary context, considering the patient’s prognosis, anticipated outcomes, and access to potentially effective treatments. We still lack robust data from prospective studies on this matter. This review examines and discusses available evidence on the use of palliative thoracic radiotherapy within the framework of modern treatment strategies for NSCLC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Review for Cancer Therapy)
9 pages, 242 KiB  
Review
Expanding Indications for Liver Transplantation in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
by Rachel Hogen, Tara Barry and Vijay Subramanian
Curr. Oncol. 2024, 31(8), 4753-4761; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31080355 - 20 Aug 2024
Viewed by 405
Abstract
Improvements in downstaging therapies have expanded the indications for liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Patients with more advanced disease are now considered candidates due to advancements in radiation therapy, combination therapies, and immunotherapy. Combination stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and trans-arterial [...] Read more.
Improvements in downstaging therapies have expanded the indications for liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Patients with more advanced disease are now considered candidates due to advancements in radiation therapy, combination therapies, and immunotherapy. Combination stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been shown to be superior to the historic treatment, sorafenib, in patients with macrovascular invasion. These patients are now candidates for LT with stable disease after LRT. Patients with ruptured HCC and prolonged stability have also been shown to have acceptable outcomes. The role of neoadjuvant immunotherapy needs to be further defined and has the potential to further improve tumor control prior to transplant. Full article
11 pages, 657 KiB  
Review
Salvage Cryoablation for Recurrent Prostate Cancer Following Radiation—A Comprehensive Review
by Harry Lee, Sameer Thakker, Kevin Pineault, James Wysock and Wei Phin Tan
Cancers 2024, 16(15), 2717; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16152717 - 31 Jul 2024
Viewed by 509
Abstract
The treatment options for prostate cancer typically entail active surveillance, surgery, radiation, or a combination of the above. Disease recurrence remains a concern, with a wide range of recurrence rates having been reported in the literature. In the setting of recurrence, the salvage [...] Read more.
The treatment options for prostate cancer typically entail active surveillance, surgery, radiation, or a combination of the above. Disease recurrence remains a concern, with a wide range of recurrence rates having been reported in the literature. In the setting of recurrence, the salvage treatment options include salvage prostatectomy, salvage high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), salvage brachytherapy, and salvage cryoablation. In this review, we analyze the currently available data related to salvage cryoablation for recurrent prostate cancer following radiation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 1392 KiB  
Review
Harnessing the Power of Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer: A Narrative Review of the Evolving Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guidance
by Sarah Hsin Cheng, Shao-Yun Lee and Hsin-Hua Lee
Cancers 2024, 16(15), 2710; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16152710 - 30 Jul 2024
Viewed by 719
Abstract
Compared with computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) traditionally plays a very limited role in lung cancer management, although there is plenty of room for improvement in the current CT-based workflow, for example, in structures such as the brachial plexus and chest [...] Read more.
Compared with computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) traditionally plays a very limited role in lung cancer management, although there is plenty of room for improvement in the current CT-based workflow, for example, in structures such as the brachial plexus and chest wall invasion, which are difficult to visualize with CT alone. Furthermore, in the treatment of high-risk tumors such as ultracentral lung cancer, treatment-associated toxicity currently still outweighs its benefits. The advent of MR-Linac, an MRI-guided radiotherapy (RT) that combines MRI with a linear accelerator, could potentially address these limitations. Compared with CT-based technologies, MR-Linac could offer superior soft tissue visualization, daily adaptive capability, real-time target tracking, and an early assessment of treatment response. Clinically, it could be especially advantageous in the treatment of central/ultracentral lung cancer, early-stage lung cancer, and locally advanced lung cancer. Increasing demands for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for lung cancer have led to MR-Linac adoption in some cancer centers. In this review, a broad overview of the latest research on imaging-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) with MR-Linac for lung cancer management is provided, and development pertaining to artificial intelligence is also highlighted. New avenues of research are also discussed. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 2060 KiB  
Systematic Review
Radiosurgery in Grade II and III Meningiomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Amin Jahanbakhshi, Masoumeh Najafi, Marzieh Gomar, Patrizia Ciammella, Maria Paola Ruggieri, Cinzia Iotti, Sebastiano Finocchi Ghersi, Anne-Agathe Serre, Lilia Bardoscia, Angela Sardaro, Sophie Boisbouvier, Camille Roukoz and Salvatore Cozzi
J. Pers. Med. 2024, 14(8), 802; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14080802 - 29 Jul 2024
Viewed by 558
Abstract
Background: Meningiomas are the most prevalent benign intracranial tumors. When they are of the invasive subtypes, i.e., grades II and III, they can recur rapidly and present a real challenge for physicians. This study is focused on the use of stereotactic radiosurgery to [...] Read more.
Background: Meningiomas are the most prevalent benign intracranial tumors. When they are of the invasive subtypes, i.e., grades II and III, they can recur rapidly and present a real challenge for physicians. This study is focused on the use of stereotactic radiosurgery to manage high-grade meningiomas. Method: Medline via PubMed was searched from inception to December 2022 to retrieve studies on stereotactic radiation therapy for patients with grade II-III meningiomas. This study was conducted under PRISMA guidelines. Result: A total of 29 articles involving 1446 patients with grade II-III meningiomas treated with stereotactic radiation therapy were included in the present study. Of these studies, 11 were conducted exclusively on patients with atypical meningiomas (grade II), 1 targeted anaplastic meningiomas (grade III), and 17 articles were carried out on both grade II and III meningiomas. The pooled 1, 2, 3, 5, and 10-year overall survival (OS) of grade II meningiomas was 0.96 [p < 0.01], 0.89 [p = 0.01], 0.90 [p = 0.09], 0.81 [p < 0.01], and 0.66 [p = 0.55], respectively. The pooled 2, 5, and 10-year OS of grade III meningiomas was 0.64 [p = 0.01], 0.41 [p = 0.01], and 0.19 [p < 0.01], respectively. Conclusions: Although long-term prospective studies are still required, the outcomes of stereotactic radiation therapy appear promising regarding overall outcome and progression-free survival. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Personalized Therapy and Drug Delivery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 2857 KiB  
Review
The Landscape of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR) for Renal Cell Cancer (RCC)
by Elena Moreno-Olmedo, Ami Sabharwal, Prantik Das, Nicola Dallas, Daniel Ford, Carla Perna and Philip Camilleri
Cancers 2024, 16(15), 2678; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16152678 - 27 Jul 2024
Viewed by 672
Abstract
Renal cell cancer (RCC) has traditionally been considered radioresistant. Because of this, conventional radiotherapy (RT) has been predominantly relegated to the palliation of symptomatic metastatic disease. The implementation of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has made it possible to deliver higher ablative doses safely, [...] Read more.
Renal cell cancer (RCC) has traditionally been considered radioresistant. Because of this, conventional radiotherapy (RT) has been predominantly relegated to the palliation of symptomatic metastatic disease. The implementation of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has made it possible to deliver higher ablative doses safely, shifting the renal radioresistance paradigm. SABR has increasingly been adopted into the multidisciplinary framework for the treatment of locally recurrent, oligoprogressive, and oligometastatic disease. Furthermore, there is growing evidence of SABR as a non-invasive definitive therapy in patients with primary RCC who are medically inoperable or who decline surgery, unsuited to invasive ablation (surgery or percutaneous techniques), or at high-risk of requiring post-operative dialysis. Encouraging outcomes have even been reported in cases of solitary kidney or pre-existing chronic disease (poor eGFR), with a high likelihood of preserving renal function. A review of clinical evidence supporting the use of ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in primary, recurrent, and metastatic RCC has been conducted. Given the potential immunogenic effect of the high RT doses, we also explore emerging opportunities to combine SABR with systemic treatments. In addition, we explore future directions and ongoing clinical trials in the evolving landscape of this disease. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Management of Renal Cell Carcinoma)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 972 KiB  
Article
Retrospective Analysis of Efficacy and Toxicity of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy and Surgical Resection of Adrenal Metastases from Solid Tumors
by Jamie Lütscher, Hans Gelpke, Adrian Zehnder, Laetitia Mauti, Christian Padevit, Hubert John, Nidar Batifi, Daniel Rudolf Zwahlen, Robert Förster and Christina Schröder
Cancers 2024, 16(15), 2655; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16152655 - 26 Jul 2024
Viewed by 374
Abstract
Background: This single-center retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity profiles of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and surgical resection in patients with adrenal metastases originating from solid tumors. Methods/Materials: Patients with advanced tumor conditions or comorbidities typically received SBRT, whereas those [...] Read more.
Background: This single-center retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity profiles of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and surgical resection in patients with adrenal metastases originating from solid tumors. Methods/Materials: Patients with advanced tumor conditions or comorbidities typically received SBRT, whereas those considered physically fit underwent standard surgical treatment. Endpoints included local control (LC), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and complication rates (CR). Results: 41 patients with 48 adrenal metastases were included, with 27 (65.9%) patients receiving SBRT and 14 (34.1%) patients undergoing adrenalectomy. One- and two-year LC values were 100% for both periods after adrenalectomy, and 70.0% and 52.5% after SBRT (p = 0.001). PFS showed values of 40.2% and 32.1% at one and two years after adrenalectomy and of 10.6% for both periods after SBRT (p = 0.223). OS was 83.3% both one and two years after surgery and 67.0% and 40.2% after SBRT (p = 0.031). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding acute complications (p = 0.123). Conclusion: Despite potential confounders, adrenalectomy exhibited statistically significant superior LC and OS compared to SBRT in managing adrenal metastases, while both treatment methods displayed acceptable toxicity profiles. However, patient selection bias must be taken into account when directly comparing the two therapy modalities. Nevertheless, the study provides new and important results for the scientific and medical communities regarding oncological outcomes after SBRT or surgical resection of adrenal metastases. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Future of Radiation Research in Cancers, 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 3537 KiB  
Article
Combining Metabolomics and Machine Learning to Identify Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarkers in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Pre- and Post-Radiation Therapy
by Mauricio Murcia-Mejía, Marta Canela-Capdevila, Raquel García-Pablo, Andrea Jiménez-Franco, Juan Manuel Jiménez-Aguilar, Joan Badía, Rocío Benavides-Villarreal, Johana C. Acosta, Mónica Arguís, Alina-Iuliana Onoiu, Helena Castañé, Jordi Camps, Meritxell Arenas and Jorge Joven
Biomolecules 2024, 14(8), 898; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom14080898 - 24 Jul 2024
Viewed by 855
Abstract
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounting for over 85% of cases and poor prognosis in advanced stages. This study explored shifts in circulating metabolite levels in NSCLC patients versus healthy controls and [...] Read more.
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounting for over 85% of cases and poor prognosis in advanced stages. This study explored shifts in circulating metabolite levels in NSCLC patients versus healthy controls and examined the effects of conventionally fractionated radiation therapy (CFRT) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). We enrolled 91 NSCLC patients (38 CFRT and 53 SBRT) and 40 healthy controls. Plasma metabolite levels were assessed using semi-targeted metabolomics, revealing 32 elevated and 18 reduced metabolites in patients. Key discriminatory metabolites included ethylmalonic acid, maltose, 3-phosphoglyceric acid, taurine, glutamic acid, glycocolic acid, and d-arabinose, with a combined Receiver Operating Characteristics curve indicating perfect discrimination between patients and controls. CFRT and SBRT affected different metabolites, but both changes suggested a partial normalization of energy and amino acid metabolism pathways. In conclusion, metabolomics identified distinct metabolic signatures in NSCLC patients with potential as diagnostic biomarkers. The differing metabolic responses to CFRT and SBRT reflect their unique therapeutic impacts, underscoring the utility of this technique in enhancing NSCLC diagnosis and treatment monitoring. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 10674 KiB  
Case Report
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Symptomatic Pancreatic Insulinoma: Two-Case Report and Literature Review
by Agnieszka Namysl-Kaletka, Jerzy Wydmanski, Iwona Debosz-Suwinska, Malgorzata Kaszuba, Dorota Gabrys, Agata Roch-Zniszczol and Daria Handkiewicz-Junak
Curr. Oncol. 2024, 31(7), 4123-4132; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31070307 - 22 Jul 2024
Viewed by 538
Abstract
Insulinoma is the most common functional neuroendocrine tumor of the pancreas, with the main clinical symptom being hypoglycemia. The standard treatment is surgery, but some patients are not eligible for surgery, while in those operated on, the risk of perioperative complications is up [...] Read more.
Insulinoma is the most common functional neuroendocrine tumor of the pancreas, with the main clinical symptom being hypoglycemia. The standard treatment is surgery, but some patients are not eligible for surgery, while in those operated on, the risk of perioperative complications is up to 30%. Diazoxide treatment to prevent hypoglycemia is effective only in 50% of patients. To prevent tumor growth and hormonal excess, stereotactic radiotherapy may be an alternative to surgical treatment. In our paper, we present two cases of patients with insulinoma treated successfully with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1806 KiB  
Article
Baseline Blood CD8+ T Cell Activation Potency Discriminates Responders from Non-Responders to Immune Checkpoint Inhibition Combined with Stereotactic Radiotherapy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
by Hanneke Kievit, M. Benthe Muntinghe-Wagenaar, Wayel H. Abdulahad, Abraham Rutgers, Lucie B. M. Hijmering-Kappelle, Birgitta I. Hiddinga, J. Fred Ubbels, Robin Wijsman, Marcel J. van der Leij, Johan Bijzet, Harry J. M. Groen, Huib A. M. Kerstjens, Anthonie J. van der Wekken, Bart-Jan Kroesen and T. Jeroen N. Hiltermann
Cancers 2024, 16(14), 2592; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16142592 - 19 Jul 2024
Viewed by 673
Abstract
Background: Tumor-infiltrating immune cells have been correlated with prognosis for patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment of various cancers. However, no robust biomarker has been described to predict treatment response yet. We hypothesized that the activation potency of circulating T cells [...] Read more.
Background: Tumor-infiltrating immune cells have been correlated with prognosis for patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment of various cancers. However, no robust biomarker has been described to predict treatment response yet. We hypothesized that the activation potency of circulating T cells may predict response to ICI treatment. Methods: An exploratory analysis was conducted to investigate the association between the response to immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) combined with stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) and the potency of circulating T cells to be activated. Blood-derived lymphocytes from 14 patients were stimulated ex vivo with, among others, Staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB) and compared to healthy controls (HCs). Patients were grouped into responders (>median progression free survival (PFS)) and non-responders (<median PFS). The expression of the T cell activation marker CD69 and intracellular cytokines (IL-2, IFNγ, TNFα) in both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in response to stimulation was measured using flow cytometry. In addition, serum levels of BAFF, IFNγ, and IL-2 receptor (sIL-2R) were measured by Luminex. Results: At baseline, a higher percentage of activated CD8+ T cells (15.8% vs. 3.5% (p = <0.01)) and IL-2+CD69+CD8+ T cells (8.8% vs. 2.9% (p = 0.02)) was observed in responders compared to non-responders upon ex vivo stimulation with SEB. The concurrently measured serum cytokine levels were not different between responders and non-responders. Conclusion: Baseline blood CD8+ T cell activation potency, measured by intracellular cytokine production after ex vivo stimulation, is a potential biomarker to discriminate responders from non-responders to SBRT combined with ICI. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Biomarkers in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC))
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1243 KiB  
Article
STRILL: Phase I Trial Evaluating Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) Dose Escalation for Re-Irradiation of Inoperable Peripheral Lung Lesions
by Davide Franceschini, Mauro Loi, Antonio Marco Marzo, Luca Dominici, Ruggero Spoto, Anna Bertolini, Lorenzo Lo Faro, Francesco La Fauci, Beatrice Marini, Luciana Di Cristina and Marta Scorsetti
Diseases 2024, 12(7), 153; https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases12070153 - 12 Jul 2024
Viewed by 679
Abstract
Few data are available on the role of SBRT re-irradiation for isolated recurrences. We designed a prospective phase I study to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of SBRT for thoracic re-irradiation, for peripheral lung lesions. RT was delivered with a dose escalation [...] Read more.
Few data are available on the role of SBRT re-irradiation for isolated recurrences. We designed a prospective phase I study to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of SBRT for thoracic re-irradiation, for peripheral lung lesions. RT was delivered with a dose escalation design from 30 Gy in five fractions up to 50 Gy in five fractions. The primary end point was the definition of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of SBRT for thoracic re-irradiation. The dose-limiting toxicity was pneumonia ≥G3. Fifteen patients were enrolled. No cases of pneumonia ≥G3 occurred in any of our cohorts. Only one patient developed pneumonia G1 during treatment. Three patients developed acute toxicities that included dyspnea G1, cardiac failure G3, and chest wall pain. One patient developed G3 late toxicity with acute coronary syndrome. After a median follow-up of 21 months (range 3.6–29.1 months), six patients (40%) had a local relapse. Distant relapse occurred in five patients (33.3%). At the last follow-up, six patients died, all but two due to progressive disease. SBRT dose escalation for thoracic re-irradiation is an effective and well-tolerated option for patients with inoperable lung lesions after a first thoracic RT with acceptable acute and late toxicities. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop