Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (1)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Tx bitrate

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
23 pages, 3441 KiB  
Article
Multilayer Measurement Methodology with Open-Source Tools for Evaluating IEEE 802.11ad Communication Quality
by Shigeru Kashihara, Morihiko Tamai, Akio Hasegawa and Hiroyuki Yokoyama
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(9), 5378; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13095378 - 25 Apr 2023
Viewed by 1466
Abstract
IEEE 802.11ad is the practical networking technology widely used as a 60 GHz millimeter-wave communication method ahead of Beyond 5G and 6G networks. However, compared with the existing Wi-Fi systems that use 2.4/5 GHz, it is difficult to manage the communication quality due [...] Read more.
IEEE 802.11ad is the practical networking technology widely used as a 60 GHz millimeter-wave communication method ahead of Beyond 5G and 6G networks. However, compared with the existing Wi-Fi systems that use 2.4/5 GHz, it is difficult to manage the communication quality due to the high carrier frequency, e.g., the signal strength suddenly and significantly degrades due to various factors such as distance and obstacles. For IEEE 802.11ad to be widely adopted, a simple and inexpensive measurement method is needed for non-specialists, including end users, to build and manage a stable IEEE 802.11ad network. In addition, easy-to-understand performance indicators are required. This paper then proposes a multilayer measurement methodology with open-source tools, i.e., iperf3, ping, and iw, for IEEE 802.11ad communication. Our methodology selects indicators necessary to evaluate IEEE 802.11ad communication performance. The tools iperf3 and ping mainly evaluate the IP layer indicators such as throughput, jitter, packet retries, packet loss, and RTT. On the other hand, the RSSI and Tx bitrates of the iw results are used to investigate the wireless link quality. Through empirical results with our measurement methodology in real environments, we show that in addition to traditional indicators such as through-put, the Tx bitrate output by iw can be a new indicator for understanding the IEEE 802.11ad communication quality. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights into Pervasive and Mobile Computing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop