Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (257)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = biomethane potential

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
17 pages, 2512 KiB  
Article
Economic Feasibility and Decarbonization Incentives of Sugarcane Biogas Production Pathways
by Flavio Eduardo Fava, Lucílio Rogério Aparecido Alves and Thiago Libório Romanelli
Agriculture 2025, 15(4), 380; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15040380 - 11 Feb 2025
Viewed by 263
Abstract
Challenges in investment decisions for new fuels remain due to uncertain scenarios regarding profitability. There is also a challenge to improve production efficiency and waste utilization, either for biomass or by-products. This study evaluates the economic potential of biomethane production within sugarcane biorefineries [...] Read more.
Challenges in investment decisions for new fuels remain due to uncertain scenarios regarding profitability. There is also a challenge to improve production efficiency and waste utilization, either for biomass or by-products. This study evaluates the economic potential of biomethane production within sugarcane biorefineries through the principles of the circular economy and economic feasibility. To obtain price data for CBios, Brent crude oil, and natural gas, stochastic models based on GBM and Monte Carlo simulations were applied to project prices and assess revenue potential over a 10-year horizon. Price data were incorporated to assess market correlations and revenue scenarios. Key findings reveal that biomethane’s price stability, driven by its strong correlation with oil markets, supports its viability as a renewable energy source, while CBio presents a weak correlation and limited price predictability with present challenges for long-term planning. Economic modeling indicates high investment returns, with IRR values surpassing 35% in conservative scenarios and payback periods from 2 to 6 years. These results highlight biomethane’s potential for energy efficiency, carbon emission reduction, and the creation of new revenue through waste use. We conclude that targeted investments in biomethane infrastructure, coupled with policy and market support, are essential for achieving global sustainability goals. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability and Energy Economics in Agriculture—2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

32 pages, 1407 KiB  
Review
Up-Flow Anaerobic Sludge Bed Reactors for Sustainable Wastewater Management: Challenges, Innovations, and Future Directions
by Uvin Eksith Senadheera, A. M. W. D. C. B. Abeykoon, P. M. N. Sewmini, W. M. R. B. Weerasekara, Nadeeka P. Darshani, Jasintha Jayasanka, Nuwan A. Weerasekara, Choolaka Hewawasam, K. K. Asanka Sanjeewa and Thilina U. Jayawardena
Water 2025, 17(4), 476; https://doi.org/10.3390/w17040476 - 8 Feb 2025
Viewed by 263
Abstract
The up-flow anaerobic sludge bed (UASB) reactor is a high-efficiency system capable of carrying out anaerobic digestion with shorter hydraulic retention times than traditional anaerobic digesters. This review highlights recent advancements in UASB reactor applications and key aspects such as microbial community dynamics [...] Read more.
The up-flow anaerobic sludge bed (UASB) reactor is a high-efficiency system capable of carrying out anaerobic digestion with shorter hydraulic retention times than traditional anaerobic digesters. This review highlights recent advancements in UASB reactor applications and key aspects such as microbial community dynamics and reactor hydrodynamics that could drive future developments. More specifically, this review evaluates the working principles of UASB reactors, explores strategies to optimize reactor efficiency, and examines technological advancements aimed at overcoming temperature constraints, managing emerging pollutants and micropollutants, and addressing scum accumulation, odor emission, and nutrient recycling challenges. Furthermore, it addresses concerns about the lack of a skilled workforce and energy loss in biomethane. The UASB reactor demonstrates high potential for enhancing global wastewater management while holding the promises of enhancing circular economic objectives, promoting efficient biogas utilization, and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

31 pages, 2054 KiB  
Article
Comparative Analysis of the Alternative Energy: Case of Reducing GHG Emissions of Estonian Pilot Fleet
by Riina Otsason, Andres Laasma, Yiǧit Gülmez, Jonne Kotta and Ulla Tapaninen
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2025, 13(2), 305; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13020305 - 6 Feb 2025
Viewed by 466
Abstract
The FuelEU Maritime Regulation, part of the European Union’s (EU’s) Fit for 55 initiative, aims to achieve significant reductions in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions within the maritime sector. This study assesses the feasibility of alternative fuels for the Estonian pilot fleet using a [...] Read more.
The FuelEU Maritime Regulation, part of the European Union’s (EU’s) Fit for 55 initiative, aims to achieve significant reductions in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions within the maritime sector. This study assesses the feasibility of alternative fuels for the Estonian pilot fleet using a Well-to-Wake (WtW) life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. Operational data from 18 vessels, sourced from the Estonian State Fleet’s records, were analyzed, including technical specifications, fuel consumption patterns, and operational scenarios. The study focused on marine diesel oil (MDO), biomethane, hydrogen, biodiesel, ammonia, and hydrotreated vegetable oil (HVO), each presenting distinct trade-offs. Biomethane achieved a 59% GHG emissions reduction but required a volumetric storage capacity up to 353% higher compared to MDO. Biodiesel reduced GHG emissions by 41.2%, offering moderate compatibility with existing systems while requiring up to 23% larger storage volumes. HVO demonstrated a 43.6% emissions reduction with seamless integration into existing marine engines. Ammonia showed strong potential for long-term decarbonization, but its adoption is hindered by low energy density and complex storage requirements. This research underscores the importance of a holistic evaluation of alternative fuels, taking into account technical, economic, and environmental factors specific to regional and operational contexts. The findings offer a quantitative basis for policymakers and maritime stakeholders to develop effective decarbonization strategies for the Baltic Sea region. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Marine Energy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 599 KiB  
Article
An Evaluation of the Energy Potential of Agri-Food Waste: Green Residues from Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) and Shea Nutshells (Vitellaria paradoxa)
by Maja Owczarek, Hanna Siwek and Małgorzata Włodarczyk
Energies 2025, 18(3), 730; https://doi.org/10.3390/en18030730 - 5 Feb 2025
Viewed by 428
Abstract
Addressing the agricultural challenges of agri-food waste accumulation, this study assessed the energy potential of green residues from tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. Kmicic) plants in different fertilizer configurations and Shea nutshell (Vitellaria paradoxa) waste. Two key parameters were compared: [...] Read more.
Addressing the agricultural challenges of agri-food waste accumulation, this study assessed the energy potential of green residues from tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. Kmicic) plants in different fertilizer configurations and Shea nutshell (Vitellaria paradoxa) waste. Two key parameters were compared: (I) Calorific Value (CV), representing thermal treatment, and (II) Biogas and Biomethane production potential, representing biochemical treatment. Potential was estimated using the Baserga method and the fermentable organic matter (FOM) method. Additionally, the effect of tomato fertilization on the elemental composition and energy potential of its waste was analyzed. Shea waste showed better properties for both thermal and biochemical utilization, with a CV of 16.29 MJ/kg. The Baserga and FOM methods of estimation showed that the highest Biogas yields from Shea waste were 504.18 and 671.39 LN/kg DM, respectively. Among fertilized tomato residues, volcanic tuff fertilizer additive resulted in an optimal C/N ratio (28.41) and a high Biogas production potential of 457.13 LN/kg DM (Baserga) and 542.85 LN/kg DM (FOM). These findings demonstrate the feasibility of employing tomato waste and Shea waste as promising feedstock for energy production. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Challenges in Waste-to-Energy and Bioenergy Systems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 3250 KiB  
Article
Freezing Method Assists Peracetic Ac98uid Oxidation for Promoting the Methane Production from Sludge Anaerobic Digestion
by Zhen-Wei Liu, Yan-Qiu Chen, Zhi-Shuai Liu and Sheng-Wu Wang
Energies 2025, 18(3), 731; https://doi.org/10.3390/en18030731 - 5 Feb 2025
Viewed by 377
Abstract
Peracetic acid (PAA) oxidation, which is a kind of chemical method for sludge pretreatment, has been verified to be valid for promoting sludge anaerobic digestion performance. However, the methane production is still limited at certain levels by this method, because excess PAA has [...] Read more.
Peracetic acid (PAA) oxidation, which is a kind of chemical method for sludge pretreatment, has been verified to be valid for promoting sludge anaerobic digestion performance. However, the methane production is still limited at certain levels by this method, because excess PAA has negative effects on methanogens. This work selected a freezing method combined with PAA to form a composite sludge pretreatment technology for synergistically improving the biomethane production. According to the experimental data, the methane yield was largely enhanced from 166.4 ± 5.6 mL/g volatile suspended solids (VSS) in the control to 261.5 ± 7.3 mL/g VSS by the combined freezing (−10 °C) and PAA (0.08 g/g TSS) pretreatment, with a 57.2% increase rate. Kinetic analysis showed that the methane production potential, methane production rate, and hydrolysis rate were promoted, respectively, from 159.4 mL/g VSS, 17.18 mL/g VSS/d, and 0.104 d−1 to 254.9 mL/g VSS, 25.69 mL/g VSS/d, and 0.125 d−1 by the freezing + PAA pretreatment. Mechanism analysis revealed that the freezing + PAA pretreatment destroyed both extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) and microbial cells in the sludge, resulting in the increase in hydrolysis efficiency. Gene analysis showed that the hydrolytic microbes (Hyphomicrobium and norank_f_Caldilineaceae), acidogens (e.g., Petrimonas, Tissierella, and Mycobacerium) and methanogens (Methanosaeta, Methanosarcina, and Methanobacterium) were all enriched by the freezing + PAA pretreatment, with the total abundances calculated to be 10.65% and 22.07% in the control and pretreated reactors, respectively. Considering both technical and economic factors, the freezing + PAA method is feasible for sludge pretreatment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section A4: Bio-Energy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 3795 KiB  
Review
Systematic and Bibliometric Review of Biomethane Production from Biomass-Based Residues: Technologies, Economics and Environmental Impact
by Gonçalo A. O. Tiago, Naresh P. B. Rodrigo, Gonçalo Lourinho, Tiago F. Lopes and Francisco Gírio
Fuels 2025, 6(1), 8; https://doi.org/10.3390/fuels6010008 - 23 Jan 2025
Viewed by 992
Abstract
Fossil fuels drive global warming, necessitating renewable alternatives such as biomethane (or renewable natural gas). Biomethane, primarily produced through anaerobic digestion (AD), offers a cleaner energy solution but is limited by the slow AD process. Biomass gasification followed by syngas methanation has emerged [...] Read more.
Fossil fuels drive global warming, necessitating renewable alternatives such as biomethane (or renewable natural gas). Biomethane, primarily produced through anaerobic digestion (AD), offers a cleaner energy solution but is limited by the slow AD process. Biomass gasification followed by syngas methanation has emerged as a faster alternative. This review examines advancements in these processes over the last decade (2015–2024), focusing on techno-economic and life cycle assessment (LCA) studies. Techno-economic analyses reveal that biomethane production costs are influenced by several factors, including process complexity, feedstock type and the scale of production. Smaller gasification units tend to exhibit higher capital costs (CAPEX) per MW capacity, while feedstock choice and process efficiency play significant roles in determining overall production costs. LCA studies highlight higher impacts for gasification and methanation due to energy demands and associated emissions. However, integrating renewable hydrogen production through electrolysis, along with innovations such as sorption-enhanced gasification (SEG), can enhance overall system efficiency and reduce environmental impacts. This review critically evaluates the technical and economic challenges, along with the opportunities for optimizing biomethane production, and discusses the potential for these technologies to contribute to sustainable bioenergy solutions in the transition to a low-carbon economy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biofuels and Bioenergy: New Advances and Challenges)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1212 KiB  
Article
Effects of the Chemical and Mechanical Pre-Treatment of Brown Seaweed on Biomethane Yields in a Batch Configuration
by Ashleen Marshall and Oluwaseun Oyekola
Biomass 2025, 5(1), 7; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomass5010007 - 21 Jan 2025
Viewed by 662
Abstract
Brown seaweed could be a viable option for biogas production, with the added advantage of not competing with land-based crops, which negates the food vs. fuel argument. To optimise the process, this research investigates using mechanical and chemical pre-treatment to increase the biomethane [...] Read more.
Brown seaweed could be a viable option for biogas production, with the added advantage of not competing with land-based crops, which negates the food vs. fuel argument. To optimise the process, this research investigates using mechanical and chemical pre-treatment to increase the biomethane yield of seaweed. The biomethane potential, biodegradability index, and biomethane yields were determined as well as the kinetics based on the hydrolysis of the anaerobic digestion process. Mechanical pre-treatment showed the highest increase in methane yield for the smaller size (<1.7 mm), recording yields of 126.16 mL/g VS after 28 days when compared to 31.54 mL/g VS for the control (2–3 mm). Chemical pre-treatment yielded higher methane rates (34.59–60.33 mL/g VS) than the control, but not as high as the mechanical pre-treatment processes. First-order kinetics described the anaerobic digestion process, with k-values between 0.050 and 0.106. The biodegradability index was between 0.145 and 0.580. The research increased the knowledge base of the potential of the Ecklonia Maxima seaweed to produce biogas. Careful consideration of the impact on the overall process must be completed to determine the advantages or disadvantages of including a pre-treatment step in the process under consideration. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 5413 KiB  
Article
Compositional Changes of Volatile Organic Compounds in Biogases and Biomethanes Depending on the Feedstock in Sweden
by Karine Arrhenius and Sandra Hultmark
Gases 2025, 5(1), 3; https://doi.org/10.3390/gases5010003 - 12 Jan 2025
Viewed by 1014
Abstract
Biogas usually contains volatile organic compounds such as terpenes, siloxanes, halogenated hydrocarbons, ketones, alcohols, furans and esters whose presence in the biogas is highly dependent on the feedstock. These trace components can affect the integrity of the materials they come into contact with, [...] Read more.
Biogas usually contains volatile organic compounds such as terpenes, siloxanes, halogenated hydrocarbons, ketones, alcohols, furans and esters whose presence in the biogas is highly dependent on the feedstock. These trace components can affect the integrity of the materials they come into contact with, e.g., equipment, pipelines and engines, and their presence in the gas may pose health, safety and environmental risks. Understanding the composition of gases is a prerequisite to ensure the correct function of gas infrastructure, appliances and vehicles. This study examined how volatile organic compound (VOC) content in biogas varies depending on the feedstock and evaluated the efficiency of different upgrading processes in removing VOCs. The data, primarily collected in Sweden, include biogases produced in digesters and landfills. The selection of VOCs included in this study was based on extensive analysis of samples collected from numerous biogas and biomethane industrial facilities over an extended period, providing a comprehensive overview of VOC composition. The conducted research is intended to serve as a basis for more systematic studies on the influence of process parameters and feedstock composition on the formation of VOCs. The data have multiple potential uses, including predicting which VOCs would be found in biomethane for a given feedstock and upgrading techniques. Additionally, these data can also be used in standardization discussions to assess the plausibility of the proposed limit values and the need to regulate additional compounds. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 3957 KiB  
Article
Alkali Pretreatment of Lignocellulose Feedstock Improves Morphological Structure and Biomethane Yield
by Daniel M. Madyira and Kehinde O. Olatunji
Sustainability 2025, 17(2), 534; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17020534 - 12 Jan 2025
Viewed by 466
Abstract
This study investigates the effects of NaOH pretreatment on the microstructural distribution and biomethane released from Xyris capensis. Xyris capensis was pretreated with NaOH using 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5% w/w concentrations for 60, 45, 30, 20, and 15 [...] Read more.
This study investigates the effects of NaOH pretreatment on the microstructural distribution and biomethane released from Xyris capensis. Xyris capensis was pretreated with NaOH using 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5% w/w concentrations for 60, 45, 30, 20, and 15 min of exposure time, respectively, at a 90 °C autoclave temperature. The impacts of the pretreatment technique on microstructural arrangement, crystallinity, and functional groups were examined with a scanning electron microscope (SEM), X-ray diffraction, and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), respectively. NaOH-pretreated and untreated feedstocks were digested at the laboratory scale at a mesophilic temperature (37 ± 2 °C) for 35 days for their biomethane potential. It was discovered from the SEM analysis that NaOH pretreatment affects the microstructural arrangement of Xyris capensis, and the sample with the longer exposure time is the most affected. The results of XRD and FTIR also indicated that NaOH pretreatment lowered the crystallinity of the feedstock and significantly influenced the functional groups at varying degrees. Biomethane yield was recorded to be 258.68, 287.80, 304.02, 328.20, 310.20, and 135.06 mL CH4/gVSadded, representing 91.53, 113.09, 125.10, 143.00, and 129.68% more increases than the untreated feedstock. It was discovered that the optimum biomethane generation was achieved when 4% w/w of NaOH concentration was utilized for 20 min. This study shows that a higher NaOH concentration with a shorter retention time is more suitable for Xyris capensis. This pretreatment method can improve the biomethane yield of Xyris capensis and can be investigated for industrial applications and its use on other lignocellulose feedstocks, especially energy grasses. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

29 pages, 3420 KiB  
Essay
Biogas Overview: Global and Brazilian Perspectives with Emphasis on Paraná State
by Sílvio M. P. Marcucci, Robison A. Rosa, Giane G. Lenzi, Jose M. Balthazar, Maria E. K. Fuziki and Angelo M. Tusset
Sustainability 2025, 17(1), 321; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17010321 - 3 Jan 2025
Viewed by 777
Abstract
Biogas is a renewable energy source that can be locally produced from the anaerobic digestion of several organic wastes, serving as a partial substitute for natural gas derived from non-renewable sources. This work provides an overview of feedstock used for biogas production, anaerobic [...] Read more.
Biogas is a renewable energy source that can be locally produced from the anaerobic digestion of several organic wastes, serving as a partial substitute for natural gas derived from non-renewable sources. This work provides an overview of feedstock used for biogas production, anaerobic digestion process, biogas usage, and global and Brazilian biogas generation. In addition, the potential output in Paraná State, Brazil was evaluated. In Brazil, the full potential of biogas, especially within the agricultural sector, has not been explored. Paraná, one of Brazil’s leading agricultural producers, has emerged as a prominent biogas producer, particularly from landfill and industrial sources, primarily for electricity generation. According to the findings of this work, the biogas produced from pig, chicken, and confined cattle waste could generate 2.23 TWh of electricity, equivalent to approximately 8% of the state’s energy consumption. Moreover, the biomethane potential surpasses the 2021 production by 3.4 times. Based on the overview and results, the biogas produced in Paraná can significantly contribute to sustainable energy generation, which would reduce greenhouse gas emissions and promote a cleaner and more environmentally friendly energy matrix. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 2714 KiB  
Article
From Microalgae to Biofuels: Investigating Valorization Pathways Towards Biorefinery Integration
by Panagiotis Fotios Chatzimaliakas, Ermis Koutsaftis-Fragkos, Sofia Mai, Dimitris Malamis and Elli Maria Barampouti
Processes 2024, 12(12), 2936; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12122936 - 22 Dec 2024
Viewed by 1170
Abstract
The rapid growth of the world population led to an exponential growth in industrial activity all around the world. Consequently, CO2 emissions have risen almost 400% since 1950 due to human activities. In this context, microalgae biomass has emerged as a renewable [...] Read more.
The rapid growth of the world population led to an exponential growth in industrial activity all around the world. Consequently, CO2 emissions have risen almost 400% since 1950 due to human activities. In this context, microalgae biomass has emerged as a renewable and sustainable feedstock for producing third-generation biofuels. This study explores the laboratory-scale production of bioethanol and biomethane from dried algal biomass. The first step was to evaluate and optimize the production of glucose from the biomass. Thus, three different techniques with three different solvents were tested to identify the most effective and efficient in terms of saccharification yield. With the assistance of an autoclave or a high-temperature water bath and 0.2 M NaOH as a solvent, yields of 79.16 ± 3.03% and 85.73 ± 3.23% were achieved which correspond to 9.24 and 9.80 g/L of glucose, respectively. Furthermore, the most efficient method from the pretreatment step was chosen to carry out a factorial design to produce bioethanol. The experiments showed that the loading of cellulase was of crucial importance to the optimization of the process. Optimized ethanolic fermentation yielded ethanol concentrations up to 4.40 ± 0.28 g/L (76.12 ± 4.90%) (0.3 Μ NaOH, 750 μL/gcellulose and 65 μL/gstarch), demonstrating the critical role of cellulase loading. Biomethane potential (BMP) assays on fermentation residues showed increased yields compared to untreated feedstock, with a maximum methane yield of 217.88 ± 10.40 mL/gVS. Combined energy production from bioethanol and biomethane was calculated at up to 1044.48 kWh/tn of algae feedstock, with biomethane contributing 75.26% to the total output. These findings highlight the potential of integrated algae-based biorefineries to provide scalable and sustainable biofuel solutions, aligning with circular economy principles. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Progress on Biomass Processing and Conversion)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

19 pages, 2105 KiB  
Article
Strategy and Performance of Biomethane Production Through Woody Biomass Gasification, Electrolysis and Methanation: A Case Study for Kočevje Region in Slovenia
by Gregor Bahč, Vladimir Prebilič, Matevž Zupančič, Igor Mihelič and Iztok Golobič
Forests 2024, 15(12), 2205; https://doi.org/10.3390/f15122205 - 14 Dec 2024
Viewed by 803
Abstract
Increasing energy demand and limited non-renewable energy resources have raised energy security concerns within the European Union. With the EU’s commitment to becoming the first climate-neutral continent, transitioning to renewable energy sources has become essential. While wind and solar energy are intermittent, consistent [...] Read more.
Increasing energy demand and limited non-renewable energy resources have raised energy security concerns within the European Union. With the EU’s commitment to becoming the first climate-neutral continent, transitioning to renewable energy sources has become essential. While wind and solar energy are intermittent, consistent and reliable green energy sources, such as biogas and biomethane, offer promising alternatives. Biogas and biomethane production from biomass address key challenges, including grid stability (“supply on demand”), decentralized energy production, energy density, and efficient storage and transportation via existing natural gas infrastructure. This study examines technologies for converting woody biomass into biomethane and proposes a conceptual design utilizing the best available technologies. The system, situated in Slovenia’s Kočevje region—one of Europe’s richest forest habitats—was scaled based on the availability of low-quality woody biomass unsuitable for other applications. Combining biomass gasification, catalytic methanation, and biomethanation, supplemented by hydrogen from electrolysis, provides an effective method for converting wood to biomethane. Despite the system’s complexity and current technological limitations in energy efficiency, the findings highlight biomethane’s potential as a reliable energy carrier for domestic and industrial applications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Forest-Based Biomass for Bioenergy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 2796 KiB  
Article
Biomethane Production from Untreated and Treated Brewery’s Spent Grain: Feasibility of Anaerobic Digestion After Pretreatments According to Biogas Yield and Energy Efficiency
by Jessica Di Mario, Alberto Maria Gambelli and Giovanni Gigliotti
Agronomy 2024, 14(12), 2980; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14122980 - 14 Dec 2024
Viewed by 780
Abstract
The increasing global energy demand, coupled with the urgent need to reduce CO2 emissions, has intensified the search for renewable energy sources. Biogas, produced from agro-industrial biomass, presents a viable solution. In beer production, brewery’s spent grain (BSG), the largest by-product by [...] Read more.
The increasing global energy demand, coupled with the urgent need to reduce CO2 emissions, has intensified the search for renewable energy sources. Biogas, produced from agro-industrial biomass, presents a viable solution. In beer production, brewery’s spent grain (BSG), the largest by-product by volume, offers potential for bioenergy recovery. This study applied a biorefinery approach to BSG, extracting protein hydrolysates (PH) through mild alkaline hydrolysis and nanostructured lignin (LN) via the Ionic Liquid Method. The objective was to assess biogas production from the residual biorefinery biomass and evaluate the co-digestion of BSG with Olive Mill Wastewater (OMWW) and Olive Pomace (OP), by-products of the olive oil industry. Biogas was produced in lab-scale batch reactors and the quantity of biogas produced was measured via the volumetric method. Conversely, the amount of biomethane obtained was evaluated by introducing, in the production chain, an alkaline trap. Biogas yields were the highest for untreated BSG (1075.6 mL), co-digested BSG with OMWW (1130.1 mL), and BSG residue after PH extraction (814.9 mL). The concentration of biomethane obtained in the various samples ranged from 54.5 vol % (OMWW + BSG) to 76.59 vol % (BSG). An energy balance analysis considering both the theoretical energy consumed by a semi-continuous anaerobic digestion bioreactor and the energy produced as bio-CH4 revealed that BSG after PH extraction was the most energy-efficient treatment, producing a net energy gain of 5.36 kJ. For the scope, the energy consumption was calculated by considering a PEIO index equal to 33% of the energy produced during the day, showing the highest biogas production. In contrast, the co-digested BSG with OMWW yielded the lowest net energy gain of 1.96 kJ. This comprehensive analysis highlights the energy efficiency of different treatments, identifying which process should be improved. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biogas and Biomethane Production from Pretreated Waste Biomasses)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1323 KiB  
Article
Effect of Corn Stover Ensiling on Methane Production and Carbon Dioxide Emissions
by Jacek Przybył, Dawid Wojcieszak and Tomasz Garbowski
Energies 2024, 17(23), 6179; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17236179 - 7 Dec 2024
Viewed by 1023
Abstract
The biogas and biomethane sectors are crucial for the European Union’s energy transition. One strategy for achieving the EU’s biogas and biomethane targets while reducing the use of agricultural land for energy feedstock production is to use alternative biomass streams. Such a stream [...] Read more.
The biogas and biomethane sectors are crucial for the European Union’s energy transition. One strategy for achieving the EU’s biogas and biomethane targets while reducing the use of agricultural land for energy feedstock production is to use alternative biomass streams. Such a stream includes agricultural residues and by-products. A good example is crop residues after harvesting corn for grain, which are available in large quantities. Due to the fact that they are lignocellulosic biomasses, they require pretreatment. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of ensiling enhancers on the methane yield of corn stover silages. Corn stover, which was harvested using the same technology, was ensiled in the first variant with an ensiling enhancer preparation based on bacteria of the Lactobacillus plantarum strain (DSM 3676 and DSM 3677) and two strains of propionic acid bacteria (DSM 9676 and DSM 9677), in the second variant with a formulation whose active ingredients were sodium benzoate, propionic acid, and sodium propionite, and in the third with a formulation based on lactic acid bacteria of the strain Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus Buchneri. The fourth variant was the control; that is, the material was ensiled naturally without the ensiling enhancer preparation. The use of the ensiling enhancer, based on lactic acid bacteria of the Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus Buchneri strains, reduced carbon dioxide emissions per 1 GJ of silage energy potential in the biogas production process. Specifically, the unique contribution of this research lies in demonstrating the role of ensiling enhancers in improving methane yield and reducing carbon dioxide emissions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Feature Papers in Energy, Environment and Well-Being)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2468 KiB  
Article
The Potential of Utilizing Cattle (Cow) Manure for Biomethane Production—An Experiment for Photofermentation
by Anita Konieczna, Kinga Borek, Jakub T. Hołaj-Krzak, Barbara Dybek, Dorota Anders, Jan Szymenderski, Kamila Klimek, Magdalena Kapłan, Zbigniew Jarosz, Serhiy Syrotyuk, Taras Stanytskyy, Serhii Korobka and Grzegorz Wałowski
Energies 2024, 17(23), 6119; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17236119 - 5 Dec 2024
Viewed by 663
Abstract
This article presents the current state of biogas (biomethane) production technology with an example of using cow manure from the perspective of photofermentation efficiency. In specialist farms, there is a problem of waste management in the form of manure; analyses were carried out [...] Read more.
This article presents the current state of biogas (biomethane) production technology with an example of using cow manure from the perspective of photofermentation efficiency. In specialist farms, there is a problem of waste management in the form of manure; analyses were carried out on the photocatalysis process in order to be able to effectively produce biomethane based on monosubstrate solutions (manure). Cow manure was tested for its elemental composition in order to determine the suitability of this raw material for biogas production. The elemental composition was compared in material A, which was stored for 1 week (fresh sample, wet), and material B, which was stored for 1 month (old sample, dry). In material A and material B, the values were as follows: N: 3.18% and 3.34%; P: 0.403% and 0.492%; K: 1.267% and 2.336%; Na: 0.362% and 0.714%; Ca: 0.705% and 0.788%; and Mg: 0.737% and 0.907%. The quality of biogas produced in atmospheric conditions from cow manure (material A and material B) was assessed. An increase in CH4 production was observed with an increase in temperature. For material A, at a temperature of 22.5 °C, it was in the range of 11–14%; for a temperature of 25.5 °C, it was approx. 35%. For material B, despite small amounts (from 0% to 2%), a tendency to increase CH4 production with an increase in temperature was also observed. At 22.4 °C, it was in the range of 0–1%, and at 25.4 °C, it was about 2%. The novelty of this article is the development of an innovative method of using cow manure, indicating the development of the biomethane industry. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomass and Waste-to-Energy for Sustainable Energy Production)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop