This is a simple calendar conversion utility that displays a given date
according to five primary standards:
Gregorian,
Julian,
Hebrew,
Islamic, and Persian (i.e.,
Solar Hijri). Change the date in any of the tables below, then click the
corresponding “Calculate” button, and the equivalent date will appear in
the other four calendars. There is now limited support for the Ottoman
fiscal (or
Rumi) calendar, a Julian derivative. In the Hebrew case, the year is also
listed according to the
Seleucid era. And for the benefit of historians of the later medieval and early
modern Persianate world, this converter further indicates the
animal year in which the given date falls. (See the “Notes
& References” section below for discussion of such arcane points.)
The core of this project was adapted from the more extensive work of
John Walker. I encourage you to spend some time exploring his
calendar page
and the underlying code, which he has graciously placed in the public
domain.
Gregorian Calendar
Julian Calendar
In the Ottoman fiscal calendar, as it was followed from 1840 through
1916 Julian, this date is …
Hebrew Calendar
In the Seleucid era, as used by some medieval Jewish communities,
this is year …
Islamic Calendar
Persian (Sol. Hijri) Calendar
In the Persianate adaptation of the Chinese-Uighur animal calendar,
this date falls in a year of the …
Using the “imperial epoch” favored by Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, this is
year …
Notes & References
Calendrical problems can be notoriously difficult for historians to
resolve. After all, a calendar is no better than the way in which it
has been observed by particular institutions, or the scrupulousness
with which dates are recorded in the source materials available to us.
With this in mind, a conversion program based on the formal rules of
the included calendars is unlikely to answer all questions. The idea
is to provide accurate calculations assuming ideal circumstances.
If you find that a certain date appears to have been converted
incorrectly on this page, please let me know
by email. (This would come as
a surprise. I’ve relied on the algorithms as coded by John Walker for
years, with nary a problem.)
In several of the Arab countries in which the Gregorian calendar is
used for civil purposes, a different
set of names
is applied to the twelve months. Similarly, the Solar Hijri calendar
is followed in Afghanistan, but with
month names
drawn from the Arabic zodiac signs, rather than from Middle Persian
(as in the Iranian version shown above). And there is yet another
naming convention in Pashto!
The Ottoman fiscal calendar, also known as the Rumi calendar,
represented a way for the Ottoman government to set dates for various
administrative processes—e.g., collecting taxes and paying
the army—that would remain in synchronization with the seasons. The
value of this, as a complement to the lunar Islamic calendar, should
be obvious. As early as 1740 CE, the Ottomans were using the Julian
date of 1 March as the beginning of the fiscal year; and this system
was developed further over time. There are a number of complications
associated with this calendrical practice. The idea, at least
initially, was for the numbering of years in the solar fiscal calendar
to be kept in alignment with the Islamic calendar. This required
dropping a year from the former every three decades.
Eventually, as part of the
Tanzimat
reforms of 1839, it was decreed that the Julian calendar would be
observed in a more systematic manner, in a variety of administrative
contexts. From 1840 through early 1917 (when the policy was changed
again), the Ottoman fiscal calendar followed relatively
straightforward rules. The year began on 1 March, and the numbering
reflected the Islamic, rather than the Christian era. The months had
different names but otherwise tracked the Julian system. Converting
from one to the other is simple. And so I have added support for this
calendar, preliminarily, for the aforementioned period. The range may
be expanded at some point. For a more detailed overview of the Ottoman
fiscal calendar, see
this article by Richard B. Rose.
In the Hebrew calendar widget, the months are listed starting with
Nisan, but each new year begins with Tishrei. This is simply a matter
of convention. With regard to the Seleucid era, I have followed the
method of subtracting 3,449 from
anno mundi. That is, Seleucid year 1 opens with the month of
Tishrei in 3450 AM, or September 312 BCE in the Julian calendar. If I
have understood correctly, this was the prevalent way of reckoning the
Seleucid era in Jewish contexts. See the
Encyclopædia Iranica
entry for a bit more background discussion.
It should be noted that the Persian calendar included above is the
version adopted in Iran in 1925, as a modernization of the
Jalali calendar
(which dated back to 1079 CE but had not been used consistently in the
intervening eras). Why would this recent standard be helpful for
history before the twentieth century? The key point is that
communities in Greater Iran have, since ancient times, treated the
March equinox as the beginning of a new
year — i.e., the festival of
Nowruz. This practice is formalized in the Solar Hijri calendar, with the
first day of the year, 1 Farvardin, occurring at the March equinox as
observed from central Iran (52.5 degrees east meridian). We can
therefore use the modern calendar
proleptically
for calculations involving years in earlier periods of
Iranian history. The practical significance of this will become clear
in the following note…
Most people are likely familiar with the
Chinese zodiac
system, in which each year is associated with an animal sign in a
repeating twelve-year cycle. The traditional Chinese calendar is
lunisolar, and the year begins with a new moon that may occur between
21 January and 20 February (Gregorian). Variants of this scheme have
been followed, and in many cases continue to be used, in countries
across Asia. During the Mongol period, the practice of classifying
years with animals was brought to Iran, and, for a time, some authors
of astronomical and historical works in Persian used the
Chinese calendar directly as a way of dating events. The animal signs
themselves became a lasting part of Persianate culture, except that
there was (quite naturally) a shift toward setting the transition
point between years at the March equinox. This convention took on
importance in the historiography of the Timurid and Safavid
periods — especially the latter. In several key Safavid
Persian chronicles, insofar as an annalistic format is employed, each
year-section begins at Nowruz and is labeled with the corresponding
animal. (Months and days are given in the Islamic calendar only.) It
is clear that authors of the time had some difficulty maintaining
concordance between the solar and lunar schemes that they used; and
this has occasionally led to confusion among modern historians. But
that is a topic best left for another conversation. Returning to the
matter of the Solar Hijri calendar, we have an accurate way of
tracking the passage of solar years in Iran from one March equinox to
the next, and so we need only a bit of modular arithmetic to calculate
the animal sign associated with any date.
For more on the use of the twelve-animal cycle in Persian, see
this journal article
by Charles Melville (of Cambridge University), and
this one
by Robert D. McChesney (of NYU).
It may go without saying, but users of this program should exercise
care when interpreting results, in proportion to the degree of
precision that is required, and with particular sensitivity to
breakpoints. If, for example, you were studying an event in Safavid
history that took place within a few days of the March equinox, it
could be difficult to determine which animal year was in effect, since
the actual observance of Nowruz varied slightly based on a number of
factors. But I hope you will find, as I have, that formally correct
conversion of dates is more than adequate in almost all cases.