Supplementary Figure 2: Comparison of R-scape to related methods CoMap and MICA [12] on the testset of 104 RNAs. | Nature Methods

Supplementary Figure 2: Comparison of R-scape to related methods CoMap and MICA [12] on the testset of 104 RNAs.

From: A statistical test for conserved RNA structure shows lack of evidence for structure in lncRNAs

Supplementary Figure 2

(a) Sensitivity (percentage of significant base pairs) and positive predictive value (percentage of significant pairs that are base pairs) as a function of the score's E-value. (b) Running times for the three methods (R-scape in black, CoMap cyan, MICA red) on a log-log plot as a function of the number of sequences in the alignment (left) and as a function of the alignment length (right). Running times are for a single 3GHz intel Core i7 with 8GB 1600GHz DDR3 RAM. Running times for R-scape and CoMap include the cost of generating a phylogenetic tree using FastTree [26].

Back to article page