Re: actualized SQL/PSM patch

Hello

On 01/04/2008, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> "Pavel Stehule" <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes:
>  > I actualized sql/psm patch. This patch can be downloaded from
>  > http://www.pgsql.cz/patches/plpgpsm.diff.gz
>
>  The fundamental problem I've got with this patch is that it adds 400K
>  of new code (and that's just the code, not counting documentation or
>  regression tests) that we'll have to maintain, to obtain a feature that
>  so far as I've heard there is precisely zero demand for.
>
>  The duplicativeness of the code with plpgsql doesn't make this prospect
>  any more pleasant, either.
>
>  The idea would be a lot easier to swallow if the code were refactored
>  to avoid the duplication with plpgsql.
>

This is long run and needs hard reorganisation of plpgsql code. And
moving some plpgsql code to core. But I don't expect so plpgpsm code
can be less than 200KB.

Regards
Pavel Stehule

>                         regards, tom lane
>