Re: Spinlock performance improvement proposal
От | Justin Clift |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Spinlock performance improvement proposal |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3BB87423.99DAC24D@postgresql.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Spinlock performance improvement proposal (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Spinlock performance improvement proposal
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > <snip> > I think the default NBuffers (64) is too low to give meaningful > performance numbers, too. I've been thinking that maybe we should > raise it to 1000 or so by default. This would trigger startup failures > on platforms with small SHMMAX, but we could tell people to use -B until > they get around to fixing their kernel settings. It's been a long time > since we fit into a 1-MB shared memory segment at the default settings > anyway, so maybe it's time to select somewhat-realistic defaults. > What we have now is neither very useful nor the lowest common > denominator... How about a startup error message which gets displayed when used with untuned settings (i.e. the default settings), maybe unless an option like -q (quiet) is given? My thought is the server should operate, but let the new/novice admin know they need to configure PostgreSQL properly. Would probably be a good reminder for experienced admins if they forget too. Maybe something simple like pg_ctl shell script message, or something proper like a postmaster start-up check. This wouldn't break anything would it? Regards and best wishes, Justin Clift > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html -- "My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the first group; there was less competition there." - Indira Gandhi
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: