Re: Replication in main PostgreSQL codebase
От | Christopher Petrilli |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Replication in main PostgreSQL codebase |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 59d991c4040706134115dc1dd0@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Replication in main PostgreSQL codebase ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>) |
Список | pgsql-admin |
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 17:07:33 -0300 (ADT), Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@postgresql.org> wrote: > It would be unwise for *anyone* to state "never" as far as inclusion of > built-in replication, but since the general consensus is that there is no > such thing as the 'all-encompassing solution' for this, the chances of one > ever coming about that would be of a scope that would be acceptable to be > built-in is next to zero ... I think what I run into is that while most of us would agree that the "one size fits all" argument is useless from a technical perspective, it's not the technical people that are usually the ones involved here. From a "marketing" perspective, it would be useful if PostgreSQL included at least a single master, single slave replication model that was easily enabled and set up. There is a subclass of the problem that is common to most situations, which is the ability to have a "live" backup. Perhaps the 'dbmirror' component in the 'contrib' directory is enough, and it simply needs to be highlighted. It does meet some subset of the needs out there. Sadly, a lot of problems are simply marketing perceptions :/ Chris -- | Christopher Petrilli | petrilli@gmail.com
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: