Re: [PATCH] New [relation] option engine
От | Yura Sokolov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] New [relation] option engine |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 61ac1e3b-4f85-4bd5-b2fa-80cc7e864755@postgrespro.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] New [relation] option engine (John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] New [relation] option engine
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
11.11.2023 12:33, John Naylor пишет: > On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 10:03 AM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 at 14:49, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: >>> >>> On 2023-Jan-31, vignesh C wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 18:38, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> There has been no updates on this thread for some time, so this has >>>> been switched as Returned with Feedback. Feel free to open it in the >>>> next commitfest if you plan to continue on this. >>> >>> Well, no feedback has been given, so I'm not sure this is a great >>> outcome. In the interest of keeping it alive, I've rebased it. It >>> turns out that the only conflict is with the 2022 -> 2023 copyright line >>> update. >>> >>> I have not reviewed it. >> >> Since there was no response to rebase the patch, I was not sure if the >> author was planning to continue. Anyways Nikolay Shaplov plans to work >> on this soon, So I have added this to the next commitfest at [1]. >> [1] - https://commitfest.postgresql.org/41/3536/ > > Nine months have passed, and there hasn't been an update since last > time it was returned. It doesn't seem to have been productive to > resurrect it to the CF based on "someone plans to work on it soon". > I'm re-returning it with feedback. > > Some time ago, there was a proposal to create a new category "lack of > interest", but that also seems to have gone nowhere because of...lack > of interest. I've rebased patch, so it could be add to commitfest again. ------ Yura Sokolov
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: