Allow CLUSTER, VACUUM FULL and REINDEX to change tablespace on thefly
От | Alexey Kondratov |
---|---|
Тема | Allow CLUSTER, VACUUM FULL and REINDEX to change tablespace on thefly |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8a8f5f73-00d3-55f8-7583-1375ca8f6a91@postgrespro.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: Allow CLUSTER, VACUUM FULL and REINDEX to change tablespace onthe fly
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Hackers, I would like to propose a change, which allow CLUSTER, VACUUM FULL and REINDEX to modify relation tablespace on the fly. Actually, all these commands rebuild relation filenodes from the scratch, thus it seems natural to allow specifying them a new location. It may be helpful, when a server went out of disk, so you can attach new partition and perform e.g. VACUUM FULL, which will free some space and move data to a new location at the same time. Otherwise, you cannot complete VACUUM FULL until you have up to x2 relation disk space on a single partition. Please, find attached a patch, which extend CLUSTER, VACUUM FULL and REINDEX with additional options: REINDEX [ ( VERBOSE ) ] { INDEX | TABLE } name [ SET TABLESPACE new_tablespace ] CLUSTER [VERBOSE] table_name [ USING index_name ] [ SET TABLESPACE new_tablespace ] CLUSTER [VERBOSE] [ SET TABLESPACE new_tablespace ] VACUUM ( FULL [, ...] ) [ SET TABLESPACE new_tablespace ] [ table_and_columns [, ...] ] VACUUM FULL [ FREEZE ] [ VERBOSE ] [ ANALYZE ] [ SET TABLESPACE new_tablespace ] [ table_and_columns [, ...] ] Thereby I have a few questions: 1) What do you think about this concept in general? 2) Is SET TABLESPACE an appropriate syntax for this functionality? I thought also about a plain TABLESPACE keyword, but it seems to be misleading, and WITH (options) clause like in CREATE SUBSCRIPTION ... WITH (options). So I preferred SET TABLESPACE, since the same syntax is used currently in ALTER to change tablespace, but maybe someone will have a better idea. 3) I was not able to update the lexer for VACUUM FULL to use SET TABLESPACE after table_and_columns and completely get rid of shift/reduce conflicts. I guess it happens, since table_and_columns is optional and may be of variable length, but have no idea how to deal with it. Any thoughts? Regards -- Alexey Kondratov Postgres Professionalhttps://www.postgrespro.com Russian Postgres Company
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: