Re: using extended statistics to improve join estimates
От | Andrei Lepikhov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: using extended statistics to improve join estimates |
Дата | |
Msg-id | a8fea1ce-4f5e-4374-9c75-ef18f5afb449@postgrespro.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: using extended statistics to improve join estimates (Andy Fan <zhihuifan1213@163.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: using extended statistics to improve join estimates
Re: using extended statistics to improve join estimates |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 20/5/2024 15:52, Andy Fan wrote: > > Hi Andrei, > >> On 4/3/24 01:22, Tomas Vondra wrote: >>> Cool! There's obviously no chance to get this into v18, and I have stuff >>> to do in this CF. But I'll take a look after that. >> I'm looking at your patch now - an excellent start to an eagerly awaited >> feature! >> A couple of questions: >> 1. I didn't find the implementation of strategy 'c' - estimation by the >> number of distinct values. Do you forget it? > > What do you mean the "strategy 'c'"? As described in 0001-* patch: * c) No extended stats with MCV. If there are multiple join clauses, * we can try using ndistinct coefficients and do what eqjoinsel does. > >> 2. Can we add a clauselist selectivity hook into the core (something >> similar the code in attachment)? It can allow the development and >> testing of multicolumn join estimations without patching the core. > > The idea LGTM. But do you want > > + if (clauselist_selectivity_hook) > + s1 = clauselist_selectivity_hook(root, clauses, varRelid, jointype, > + > > rather than > > + if (clauselist_selectivity_hook) > + *return* clauselist_selectivity_hook(root, clauses, ..) Of course - library may estimate not all the clauses - it is a reason, why I added input/output parameter 'estimatedclauses' by analogy with statext_clauselist_selectivity. -- regards, Andrei Lepikhov Postgres Professional
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: