Version 1
: Received: 12 August 2022 / Approved: 17 August 2022 / Online: 17 August 2022 (08:45:00 CEST)
Version 2
: Received: 22 August 2022 / Approved: 23 August 2022 / Online: 23 August 2022 (03:35:09 CEST)
Version 3
: Received: 25 August 2022 / Approved: 26 August 2022 / Online: 26 August 2022 (03:33:17 CEST)
Version 4
: Received: 29 August 2022 / Approved: 29 August 2022 / Online: 29 August 2022 (10:40:44 CEST)
Version 5
: Received: 1 September 2022 / Approved: 2 September 2022 / Online: 2 September 2022 (03:30:54 CEST)
Version 6
: Received: 4 September 2022 / Approved: 5 September 2022 / Online: 5 September 2022 (05:15:15 CEST)
Version 7
: Received: 9 September 2022 / Approved: 13 September 2022 / Online: 13 September 2022 (03:08:59 CEST)
Version 8
: Received: 13 September 2022 / Approved: 14 September 2022 / Online: 14 September 2022 (03:21:21 CEST)
Version 9
: Received: 15 September 2022 / Approved: 16 September 2022 / Online: 16 September 2022 (03:18:08 CEST)
Version 10
: Received: 21 September 2022 / Approved: 21 September 2022 / Online: 21 September 2022 (09:57:44 CEST)
Version 11
: Received: 28 September 2022 / Approved: 29 September 2022 / Online: 29 September 2022 (03:02:54 CEST)
Version 12
: Received: 17 October 2022 / Approved: 18 October 2022 / Online: 18 October 2022 (04:11:20 CEST)
H Manninen, A. Chronic Positive Mass Balance Is the Actual Etiology of Obesity: A Living Review. Global Translational Medicine, 2023, 2, 222. https://doi.org/10.36922/gtm.222.
H Manninen, A. Chronic Positive Mass Balance Is the Actual Etiology of Obesity: A Living Review. Global Translational Medicine, 2023, 2, 222. https://doi.org/10.36922/gtm.222.
H Manninen, A. Chronic Positive Mass Balance Is the Actual Etiology of Obesity: A Living Review. Global Translational Medicine, 2023, 2, 222. https://doi.org/10.36922/gtm.222.
H Manninen, A. Chronic Positive Mass Balance Is the Actual Etiology of Obesity: A Living Review. Global Translational Medicine, 2023, 2, 222. https://doi.org/10.36922/gtm.222.
Abstract
It is widely assumed that the fundamental cause of obesity is an energy imbalance between calories consumed and calories expended (i.e., the energy balance theory; EBT). However, this century-old obesity paradigm must be fallacious. According to known laws of physics, chronic positive mass balance is the actual etiology of obesity, not positive energy balance. The relevant physical law in terms of body mass regulation is the Law of Conservation of Mass, not the Law of Conservation of Energy. It is important to understand that energy balance and mass balance are separate balances in the human body. Calories represent the heat release upon food oxidation, and as such, calories have no impact on body mass. Body mass can only change due to net mass flow; thus, the only food property that can augment body mass is its nutrient mass, not its energy content. A recently proposed mass balance model (MBM) describes the temporal evolution of body weight and body composition under a wide variety of feeding experiments, and it seems to provide a highly accurate description of the very best experimental human feeding data. By shifting to a mass balance paradigm of obesity, a deeper understanding of this disease may follow in the near future. The purpose of this living review is to present the core issues of the upcoming paradigm shift as well as some practical applications related to the topic.
Keywords
obesity; body weight regulation; macronutrients; energy balance theory; mass balance model; paradigm shift; living review
Subject
Medicine and Pharmacology, Dietetics and Nutrition
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Comment:
Some sections of my article have been evaluated by a highly advanced artificial intelligence program (OpenAI). These sections are the so-called hard natural science, because this program makes it very challenging to analyze writings closer to practice. Below are a few examples of these assessments.
"It is generally accurate to say that living organisms are open systems, meaning that they can exchange both energy and mass with their surroundings. This means that the mass of a living organism can vary over time, depending on the exchange of mass with the surroundings.
It is also correct to say that an energy imbalance does not always lead to a change in body mass. Energy balance refers to the balance between energy intake and energy expenditure, and it can be positive (meaning that energy intake is greater than energy expenditure) or negative (meaning that energy expenditure is greater than energy intake). An energy imbalance can occur when there is a difference between energy intake and energy expenditure, but it does not necessarily lead to a change in body mass. Factors such as individual differences in metabolism, physical activity levels, and overall energy balance can also play a role in determining changes in body mass.
It is also important to note that the Law of Conservation of Energy states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, but it can be converted from one form to another. The law does not directly apply to changes in body mass or to the exchange of mass with the surroundings.
In summary, living organisms are open systems that can exchange both energy and mass with their surroundings, and an energy imbalance does not always lead to a change in body mass. Factors such as individual differences in metabolism, physical activity levels, and overall energy balance can also play a role in determining changes in body mass."
"Yes, energy balance and mass balance are separate balances in the human body."
"Yes, that is correct. The protons and neutrons in the nucleus of an atom account for almost all of the mass of the atom, and these nucleons are relatively stable and do not change in chemical reactions. Chemical reactions involving atoms only involve the movement and rearrangement of the electrons in the outer electron cloud, and do not affect the nucleus.
In the human body, chemical reactions involving the metabolism of food and other substances can release or consume energy, but they do not significantly change the mass of the atoms involved. The only way that the mass of the human body can change is through the net flow of mass in and out of the body. Nutrient mass, which includes the mass of the various molecules that make up the food we eat, is the only food property that can contribute to an increase in body mass."
"The statement you provided is generally correct, with some minor qualifications.
It is true that any intervention aimed at reducing obesity must either decrease the intake of energy-providing mass (EPM) or increase the elimination of oxidation products (such as carbon dioxide, water, and urea), or both. This is because weight loss, whether it is due to changes in body fat or muscle mass, or both, is ultimately governed by the Law of Conservation of Mass, which states that the total mass of the reactants (in this case, EPM) must equal the total mass of the products (such as carbon dioxide, water, and urea) produced during the oxidation reactions that occur during cellular respiration.
It is also correct that weight loss can be classified into two categories: energy expenditure-dependent mass loss (EEDML) and energy expenditure-independent mass loss (EEIML). EEDML refers to the daily excretion of EPM oxidation byproducts (such as carbon dioxide, water, and urea), while EEIML refers to the daily weight loss that results from the elimination of non-metabolically produced water, minerals lost in sweat and urine, fecal matter, and the renewal of skin, hair, and nails."
Comment:
When I finally managed to explain the overall picture to the OpenAI, it states:
"The mass balance model, on the other hand, takes into account the exchange of mass with the surroundings, including the intake and excretion of nutrients, water, and other substances. This model is generally considered to be more accurate when it comes to understanding the regulation of body mass, as it accounts for the flow of mass in and out of the body."
Commenter: Anssi Manninen
Commenter's Conflict of Interests: Author
Commenter: Jimbo Crackpotterman
The commenter has declared there is no conflict of interests.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Commenter:
Commenter's Conflict of Interests: Author
"It is generally accurate to say that living organisms are open systems, meaning that they can exchange both energy and mass with their surroundings. This means that the mass of a living organism can vary over time, depending on the exchange of mass with the surroundings.
It is also correct to say that an energy imbalance does not always lead to a change in body mass. Energy balance refers to the balance between energy intake and energy expenditure, and it can be positive (meaning that energy intake is greater than energy expenditure) or negative (meaning that energy expenditure is greater than energy intake). An energy imbalance can occur when there is a difference between energy intake and energy expenditure, but it does not necessarily lead to a change in body mass. Factors such as individual differences in metabolism, physical activity levels, and overall energy balance can also play a role in determining changes in body mass.
It is also important to note that the Law of Conservation of Energy states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, but it can be converted from one form to another. The law does not directly apply to changes in body mass or to the exchange of mass with the surroundings.
In summary, living organisms are open systems that can exchange both energy and mass with their surroundings, and an energy imbalance does not always lead to a change in body mass. Factors such as individual differences in metabolism, physical activity levels, and overall energy balance can also play a role in determining changes in body mass."
"Yes, energy balance and mass balance are separate balances in the human body."
"Yes, that is correct. The protons and neutrons in the nucleus of an atom account for almost all of the mass of the atom, and these nucleons are relatively stable and do not change in chemical reactions. Chemical reactions involving atoms only involve the movement and rearrangement of the electrons in the outer electron cloud, and do not affect the nucleus.
In the human body, chemical reactions involving the metabolism of food and other substances can release or consume energy, but they do not significantly change the mass of the atoms involved. The only way that the mass of the human body can change is through the net flow of mass in and out of the body. Nutrient mass, which includes the mass of the various molecules that make up the food we eat, is the only food property that can contribute to an increase in body mass."
"The statement you provided is generally correct, with some minor qualifications.
It is true that any intervention aimed at reducing obesity must either decrease the intake of energy-providing mass (EPM) or increase the elimination of oxidation products (such as carbon dioxide, water, and urea), or both. This is because weight loss, whether it is due to changes in body fat or muscle mass, or both, is ultimately governed by the Law of Conservation of Mass, which states that the total mass of the reactants (in this case, EPM) must equal the total mass of the products (such as carbon dioxide, water, and urea) produced during the oxidation reactions that occur during cellular respiration.
It is also correct that weight loss can be classified into two categories: energy expenditure-dependent mass loss (EEDML) and energy expenditure-independent mass loss (EEIML). EEDML refers to the daily excretion of EPM oxidation byproducts (such as carbon dioxide, water, and urea), while EEIML refers to the daily weight loss that results from the elimination of non-metabolically produced water, minerals lost in sweat and urine, fecal matter, and the renewal of skin, hair, and nails."
Commenter:
Commenter's Conflict of Interests: Author
"The mass balance model, on the other hand, takes into account the exchange of mass with the surroundings, including the intake and excretion of nutrients, water, and other substances. This model is generally considered to be more accurate when it comes to understanding the regulation of body mass, as it accounts for the flow of mass in and out of the body."