Nishimura, A.; Ichikawa, M.; Yamada, S.; Ichii, R. The Characteristics of a Ni/Cr/Ru Catalyst for a Biogas Dry Reforming Membrane Reactor Using a Pd/Cu Membrane and a Comparison of It with a Ni/Cr Catalyst. Hydrogen2024, 5, 414-435.
Nishimura, A.; Ichikawa, M.; Yamada, S.; Ichii, R. The Characteristics of a Ni/Cr/Ru Catalyst for a Biogas Dry Reforming Membrane Reactor Using a Pd/Cu Membrane and a Comparison of It with a Ni/Cr Catalyst. Hydrogen 2024, 5, 414-435.
Nishimura, A.; Ichikawa, M.; Yamada, S.; Ichii, R. The Characteristics of a Ni/Cr/Ru Catalyst for a Biogas Dry Reforming Membrane Reactor Using a Pd/Cu Membrane and a Comparison of It with a Ni/Cr Catalyst. Hydrogen2024, 5, 414-435.
Nishimura, A.; Ichikawa, M.; Yamada, S.; Ichii, R. The Characteristics of a Ni/Cr/Ru Catalyst for a Biogas Dry Reforming Membrane Reactor Using a Pd/Cu Membrane and a Comparison of It with a Ni/Cr Catalyst. Hydrogen 2024, 5, 414-435.
Abstract
This study proposed the combination system consisting of biogas dry reforming reactor and solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC). Since a biogas dry reforming is an endothermic reaction, this study adopted a membrane reactor operated due to the non-equilibrium state with H2 separation from the reaction space. This study aimed to clarify the characteristics of Ni/Cr/Ru catalyst using for a biogas dry reforming membrane reactor. Additionally, this study also investigated the comparison of the characteristics of Ni/Cr/Ru catalyst with that of Ni/Cr catalyst. The impact of operation temperature, the molar ratio of CH4 : CO2, the differential pressure between the reaction chamber and the sweep chamber and the introduction of sweep gas on the characteristics of the biogas dry reforming membrane reactor using Pd/Cu membrane and Ni/Cr/Ru catalyst was examined. The concentration of H2 using Ni/Cr/Ru catalyst was larger than that using Ni/Cr catalyst by 2871 ppmV for the molar ratio of CH4 : CO2 = 1.5 : 1 at the reaction temperature of 600 ℃ and the differential pressure of 0 MPa without a sweep gas, especially. Under this condition, CH4 conversion, H2 yield and thermal efficiency were 67.4 %, 1.77×10-2 % and 0.241 %, respectively.
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
