Article
Version 1
Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed
Sociopolitical Genealogy Of Populist Conspiracy Theories And The Hyperpolitics
Version 1
: Received: 1 May 2024 / Approved: 2 May 2024 / Online: 2 May 2024 (10:11:01 CEST)
A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.
Esposito, A. Sociopolitical Genealogy of Populist Conspiracy Theories in the Context of Hyperpolitics. Genealogy 2024, 8, 66. Esposito, A. Sociopolitical Genealogy of Populist Conspiracy Theories in the Context of Hyperpolitics. Genealogy 2024, 8, 66.
Abstract
The wide circulation of conspiracy narratives and their frequent intertwining with populist rhetoric is both an element of concern and a topic of intense scientific and philosophical debate. The depth of the link between conspiracy theories and populism represents a crucial issue whose comprehension can facilitate understanding their specific nature and the factors behind their diffusion in public communication. To this end, it is necessary to cultivate an interdisciplinary approach and great critical attention, eschewing monocausal explanations. This paper addresses the question of the essentially political nature of conspiracism confronting the recent epistemological debate that, by putting the positivist paradigm aside, has sought to explore and understand the socio-cultural roots of conspiracy rhetoric, with its sceptical, antagonistic and hermetic traits. By integrating the reflections of epistemologists such as Cassam or Harris with the considerations of political scientists such as Taggart and with Schmitt's radical reflections on politics, it is perhaps possible to reintegrate the different approaches to populist conspiracism into an overall social genealogical perspective, thanks also to recent demographic elaborations. Thus, we could ascribe the spread of conspiracism to the prevalence in societies of a hyper-political discursive regime, i.e. founded on the principle of opposition, without the possibility of compromise, between different groups and interests. At the basis of such Manichaeism, it is plausible to place in the first place the growing inequalities and related social disintegration, which hinder the circulation of trust and recognition between individuals and groups, thus ending up undermining democracy at its roots, as a political system that legitimises and thus peacefully regulates conflict.
Keywords
onspiracism; populism; hyperpolitics; democracy; inequality; social capital; trust; power
Subject
Social Sciences, Sociology
Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Comments (0)
We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.
Leave a public commentSend a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
