Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Preprint Brief Report Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

The Standards of Over-the-Counter Cuffless Sphygmomanometers for Monitoring Blood Pressure

Version 1 : Received: 9 June 2024 / Approved: 10 June 2024 / Online: 11 June 2024 (08:46:52 CEST)

How to cite: Huang, M.; Tamura, T.; Umezu, S. The Standards of Over-the-Counter Cuffless Sphygmomanometers for Monitoring Blood Pressure. Preprints 2024, 2024060627. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202406.0627.v1 Huang, M.; Tamura, T.; Umezu, S. The Standards of Over-the-Counter Cuffless Sphygmomanometers for Monitoring Blood Pressure. Preprints 2024, 2024060627. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202406.0627.v1

Abstract

Cuffless sphygmomanometers may be useful alternative blood pressure monitors for screening and home healthcare. The main requirements for these devices are accuracy in the resting state, accuracy during dynamic blood pressure changes, and long-term stability. Intermittent measurements can ensure that the accuracy of active measurements mirrors that of measurements in the resting and dynamic states. This brief report proposes a new protocol to evaluate long-term stability based on a comparison with a medically approved cuff-based automated sphygmomanometer rather than an auscultatory sphygmomanometer. Dynamic changes in blood pressure are not usually assessed based on intermittent measurement with an over-the-counter (OTC) sphygmomanometer. Thus, validation testing focused on the accuracy of the OTC cuffless sphygmomanometer in the resting state and the long-term stability of the device, and the results were similar to those of the cuff-based sphygmomanometer. Further research and discussions are necessary to develop standards derived from high-quality evidence for manufacturers of OTC sphygmomanometers.

Keywords

cuffless sphygmomanometer; accuracy; long-term stability; over-the-counter device; standards; variability

Subject

Engineering, Bioengineering

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.