Vapi Cetp
Vapi Cetp
CONTRIBUTIONS
Guidance, Planning, and Principal Coordinators Dr. B. Sengupta, Member Secretary Mr. P. M. Ansari, Additional Director Mr. Paritosh Kumar, Senior Environmental Engineer
Report preparation
Monotoring of CETPs
CPCB Zonal Office, Bangalore CPCB Zonal Office, Bhopal CPCB Zonal Office, Lucknow CPCB Zonal Office, Varodara CPCB Zonal Office, Kolkata PCI-III Division, CPCB Head Office, Delhi Urban Pollution Division, CPCB Head Office, Delhi PCI-I Division, CPCB Head Office, Delhi IFD Division, CPCB Head Office, Delhi
Analysis of samples
CPCB Zonal Office Laboratory, Bangalore CPCB Zonal Office Laboratory, Bhopal CPCB Zonal Office Laboratory, Lucknow CPCB Zonal Office Laboratory, Varodara Wastewater, Laboratory CPCB Head Office, Delhi
FOREWORD
Mindful of the key role played by SSI units and the constraints in complying with pollution control norms individually by these units, the Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF), Govt. of India initiated a technical and financial support scheme to promote common facilities for treatment of effluents generated from SSI units located in clusters. Under the Common Effluent Treatment Plant (CETP) financial assistance scheme, 50% subsidy on project capital cost - 25% share each of Central and State Governments - was provided. As a result, 88 CETPs having total capacity of 560 MLD have been set up throughout India covering more than 10000 polluting industries. Considering the coverage of industries under CETPs and the total pollution load handled by these CETPs, State Pollution Control Boards need to keep a close watch on their operation. More so because inspection of a large number of CETPs by Central Pollution Control Board has revealed that, in general, the CETPs are not performing satisfactorily, largely due to improper operation and maintenance.
This report presents results of performance evaluation studies conducted by Central Pollution Control Board and discusses several technical issues in relation to satisfactory operation of CETPs. We hope the information contained in the report would be useful to all concerned.
CONTENTS
1. Introduction
3. Technical performance
10
6. Recommendations Annexure
28
Table 1: CETPs capacity, year of establishment, capital cost and related information Table 2: CETPs treatment technologies and wastewater collection & disposal system Table 3: Performance of CETPs in terms of aggregate water quality parameters Table 4: Metals and special parameters in effluent from CETPs Table 5: Hazardous sludge / solid waste generation and handling in CETPs Table 6: List of proposed CETPs
30
34
39
52 60
65
1.
1.1
INTRODUCTION
Small-scale industries (SSIs) have a very important role in overall industrial development in India and growth of SSI units has been actively promoted by Government of India to induce balanced economic growth and to distribute the benefits of industrial development in an equitable manner. Industries having capital investment up to Rs.10 millions are classified as SSI units. It is estimated that more than 300,000 SSI units are spread all over India, mainly in about 867 clusters/industrial estates of the country.
1.2
It is difficult for each industrial unit to provide and operate individual wastewater treatment plant because of the scale of operations or lack of space or technical manpower. However, the quantum of pollutants emitted by SSIs clusters may be more than an equivalent largescale industry, since the specific rate of generation of pollutants is generally higher because of the inefficient production technologies adopted by SSIs.
1.3
Keeping in view the key role played by SSI units and the constraints in complying with pollution control norms individually by these units, The Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) initiated an innovative technical and financial support scheme to ensure their growth in an environmentally compatible manner. The scheme promoted common facilities for treatment of effluents generated from SSI units located in clusters through liberal financial assistance. The financial assistance provided under this Common Effluent Treatment Plant (CETP) scheme was as follows:
Loans from financial institutions- 30% of the project capital cost, and
The CETP scheme was instituted initially for a period of 10 years with effect from the year 1991 but MoEF has decided to continue financial assistance under the scheme beyond this period. Most of the 88 CETPs constructed and commissioned so far were financed under the CETP scheme of Govt. of India.
1.4
The concept of CETP was adopted as a way to achieve end-of-pipe treatment of combined wastewater at lower unit cost than could be achieved by individual industries, and to facilitate discharge, monitoring and enforcement by environmental regulatory agencies and the investment of substantial government finances in the CETP scheme was justified on the basis of potential benefits in terms of pollution reduction and environmental improvements.
1.5
Of the 88 CETPs that have been constructed and commissioned so far in the country, the Central Pollution Control Board has studied performance of 78 CETPs operating throughout the country. This report summarizes the findings of various performance evaluation studies carried out by or on behalf of the Central Pollution Control Board.
2.
2.1
2.2
2.3
Classification of the operational CETPs on the basis of number of member units is as below:
State Number of CETPs 3 11 16 1 2 11 1 2 8 29 3 1 88 Information available about no. of members 3 11 14 1 2 6 1 2 8 22 3 1 74 Number of CETPs having <100 members 2 0 6 0 2 2 1 2 4 21 2 0 42 (57%) Number of CETPs having >100 to 400 members 1 0 5 1 0 3 0 0 2 1 1 0 14 (19%) Number of CETPs having >400 members 0 11 3 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 18 (24%)
AP Delhi Gujrat Haryana Karnataka Maharashtra MP Punjab Rajasthan Tamilnadu UP West Bengal Total
2.4
3.
3.1
TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE
Overall and treatment stage wise performance of all the CETPs in terms of general parameters pH, Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), Total Suspended Solids (TSS) and Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) is summarized and provided in Annexure (Table 3). Sodium (Na) and Chlorides (Cl-) are also shown with general parameters to indicate nature of TDS.
3.2
Some of the CETPs have also been studied for concentration of toxic metals and special parameters- Percent sodium (%Na), Sulphates (SO4) and Ammonia (NH3-N) in their raw influent and treated effluent. These results are provided in Annexure (Table 4)
3.3
Prescribed standards for various parameters for discharge of treated effluents of CETPs into surface waters and for discharge on land are shown at the end of Tables 3 and Table 4. Observed values of various parameters in treated effluent have been compared with the applicable standard based on the ultimate disposal point for each CETP shown in Table 2. Observed value of various parameters exceeding the prescribed standards in the treated effluents have been are underlined in the Tables 3 and Tables 4.
3.4
It is observed from the summary of results shown below that of the total 78 CETPs studied, only 20 (i.e. 25.6%) complied with the prescribed limits for general parameters pH, BOD, COD and TSS but 15 of these were not able to comply with the prescribed limit for TDS. Thus, only 5 (i.e. 6.4%) CETPs were complying all general parameters including TDS.
CETPs complying pH, BOD, COD and TSS but not complying TDS standard Number Name AP 0 Delhi 6 Wazirpur, Mangolpuri, Jhilmil, SMA, Nangaloi, Okhla I.A Gujrat 15 2 Ankleshwar, Sachin (0.5MLD) Haryana 1 0 Karnataka 2 1 Pai&Pai Maharashtra 9 3 Thane-Belapur, Ambernath, Patalganga MP 1 0 0 Punjab 1 1 Phillore 0 Rajasthan 5 0 1 Jodhpur** Tamilnadu 29 0 2 Thiruvai Karur***, TALCO Ambur Thuthipet UP 3 0 0 Total 78 5 (6.4 %) 15 (19.2 %) *TDS not determined but likely to be within limits; **CETP was under trial; TDS not determined but Cl exceeded; ***TSS not determined State Number of CETPs studied by CPCB 2 10 CETPs complying pH, BOD, COD, TSS and TDS standards Number Name 0 3 Mayapuri, GTK, Badli 0 1* Kundli-I 0 0
3.5
High TDS in treated effluent is observed to be a widespread problem. Apart from the five CETPs that complied with TDS as well as other general parameters, only four other CETPs complied with TDS limits even though these CETPs did not comply with other general parameters. Thus, in all, 69 (i.e. 88.5%) out of the 78 CETPs did not complied with TDS standards.
3.6
It is also observed that salinity, primarily due to salts of sodium, is the primary contributor to the high TDS problem as high TDS is almost invariably accompanied by high Chlorides and Sodium concentration. TDS reduction is possible by softening process if TDS is mainly due to salts of divalent cations but if it is mainly due to salts of mono-valent cations then Reverse Osmosis (RO) is a technical option . However, the concentrate has to be further evaporated to get the salts in solid form that may be disposed off in secured landfill.
3.7
The TDS concentration of the wastewaters is mainly due to the inorganic ions in the water supply and those added during the use of water. In industries such as Tanneries, Pharmaceutical units, Chemicals manufacturing units and Dye & Dye Intermediates units, the high TDS in wastewaters can be primarily attributed to addition during the use of water. In all such cases the best approach for reduction of TDS is to try reduction at source by adopting cleaner technologies for reduction of net input of chemicals, practicing recovery and recycling of chemicals. The chemical treatment adopted in the treatment scheme at CETP generally does not specifically aim at removing these ions. Therefore, reduction in the TDS concentration of the effluent during its treatment is not expected.
3.8
It is observed from the unit-wise performance data of various CETPs that poor performance of primary- and secondary-settling units is an important factor responsible for overall poor performance of CETPs. The efficiency of treatment by the physico-chemical process is decided by the TSS concentration in the effluent of primary settling unit. Similarly, one of the main requirements for successful operation of secondary biological unit is the effective settling of the mixed liquor in secondary settling unit for recycling of biological sludge and providing clarified effluent. Treatment schemes of almost all the CETPs employ primary settling as one treatment unit and secondary biological treatment is also employed in most of the schemes. Sub-level performance of primary and secondary settling units has been observed in a large number of CETPs.
3.9
A well performing primary settling unit is expected to achieve <50 mg/L TSS in its effluent and in no case it should exceed 100 mg/L limit. Similarly, a well performing secondary settling unit easily provides an effluent having <50 mg/L TSS. It is observed that of the 44 primary settling
units studied in different CETPs, 35 were performing poorly as the TSS in effluent of these units exceeded 50 mg/L, 30 units even did not meet 100 mg/L limit. It is further observed that of the 51 secondary settling units studied in different CETPs, 35 were performing poorly as TSS in effluent of these units exceeded 50 mg/L, 30 units even did not meet the prescribed standard of 100 mg/L. This indicates that there is scope for improvement of the performance of CETPs by paying attention to the performance of settling units. Things which require investigations include optimizing the chemical doses, proper flocculation, proper sludge withdrawal frequency and duration, avoiding short-circuiting in the tank, assessing surface overflows, solids loading and weir loading, adjusting optimum re-circulation rate in secondary settling tank.
3.10 In two CETPs of Andhra Pradesh, the Dissolved Air Floatation (DAF) units are not able to give any significant reduction in organic matter or suspended solids. Replacement of DAF unit with a primary settling unit in Pattancheru CETP, where no primary settling tank exists, and discontinuation of use of DAF unit in Jeedimetla CETP, where it is installed ahead of primary settling tank, may be considered for improving efficiency of primary treatment and reducing operational costs. An effective primary physico-chemical treatment is also expected to improve overall COD removal efficiency as high COD and TDS in treated effluent is a major problem in these two CETPs of Andhra Pradesh.
3.11 Dual Media Filter (DMF) unit, which has been employed in treatment schemes of CETPs in Delhi and at few other places and sand filter unit which has been employed in CETPs of textile units in Tamilnadu are normally used to improve suspended solids level from near 50 mg/L in primary settling units effluent to near 10 mg/L. Incidentally, it also reduces the organic matter associated with the suspended matter so removed. It may also remove a small fraction of organic matter associated with colloidal matter that is coagulated and filtered during filtration. Filter units should not be depended upon to perform more than the expected function, as explained. If DMF unit or a rapid sand filter unit is over loaded, it will require frequent backwashing.
3.12 Activated Carbon Filter (ACF) unit, which has been employed in treatment schemes of CETPs in Delhi and at few other places is only meant for removing trace organics, such as pesticides, phenols, etc., and heavy metals, which escape the primary treatment and therefore should not be loaded with bulk organic matter. If any treatment scheme, with ACF as its terminal treatment unit, is aimed at achieving an overall efficiency so as to give the final effluent quality of BOD<30 mg/L and COD<250 mg/L, then ACF unit is most likely to be subjected to high COD, or even high BOD, thereby resulting in an early exhaustion of its
activated carbon bed. Therefore, in treatment schemes aimed to achieve this quality, ACF as a terminal treatment unit can be said to be a misfit because very frequent replacement or regeneration of the bed is neither easy nor economically affordable.
3.13 Most of the CETPs in textile units of Tirupur and Karur have employed treatment scheme having physico-chemical treatment followed by sand filtration and stabilization tank. Only a few have adopted treatment scheme having biological secondary treatment. CETPs of the former type require special efforts in optimizing chemical dozing for their greater dependency on physico-chemical treatment.
3.14 Treatment schemes of Odhav CETP (Gujrat), Nandesari CETP (Gujrat), Sarigam CETP (Gujrat), Dhareshwar CETP (Gujrat), Sachin-II CETP (Gujrat) have three-stage treatment and that of Tarapur CETP (Maharashtra) has four-stage treatment but still these plants were not meeting standards. This reflects gross neglect in operation. If biological treatment units are properly operated and full attention is paid to proper settling at different stages of treatment as explained in section 3.8 above, performance of these plants could be greatly improved.
4.
Andhra Pradesh: Hazardous waste generated from one CETP (Jeedimelta) is stored within CETPs premises and other CETP (Pattancheru) is member in TSDF at Dindigul
Delhi: Hazardous waste generated from CETPs is stored within CETPs premises and no common hazardous waste disposal facility has been developed. A common temporary hazardous waste storage facility is being developed and is expected to be in use by December 2005. The hazardous waste storage provided at CETP Wazirpur had been filled up and large quantity of hazardous sludge removed from the CETP was kept at the site for temporary hazardous waste facility which has been taken away for disposal at unknown place.
Gujrat: Hazardous waste of 9 CETPs disposed of in Common Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage and Disposal Facilities (CHWTSDF) Hazardous waste of remaining 7 CETPs is stored within CETPs premises.
Haryana: Hazardous waste generated from CETP is stored within CETPs premises and no scientific hazardous waste treatment and disposal facility has been developed.
Karnataka: Hazardous waste generated from CETPs is stored within CETPs premises and no common scientific hazardous waste treatment and disposal facility has been developed.
Maharashtra: Hazardous waste of 6 CETPs disposed of in Common Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage and Disposal Facilities (CHWTSDF) Hazardous waste of remaining 7 CETPs is stored within CETPs premises.
MP: Hazardous waste generated from CETP is discharged into drain and no scientific hazardous waste treatment and disposal facility has been developed. Thus the purpose of removal of pollutants is defeated.
Punjab: Hazardous waste generated from one CETP is stored within CETPs premises and other CETP is un-operational. No common scientific hazardous waste treatment and disposal facility has been developed.
Rajasthan: Hazardous waste generated from CETPs is stored within CETPs premises or discharged on land elsewhere. No common scientific hazardous waste treatment and disposal facility has been developed.
Tamilnadu: Hazardous waste of 4 CETPs disposed of in secured landfill within their premises, of 2 other CETPs is stored on an impervious common place and of the remaining 23 CETPs is stored within CETPs premises. No other common scientific hazardous waste treatment and disposal facility has been developed.
UP: Hazardous waste generated from 2 CETPs is stored within CETPs premises and from Kanpur CETP is disposed of on land by civic authorities. No other common scientific hazardous waste treatment and disposal facility has been developed
West Bengal: Temporary hazardous waste storage facility is under construction for Calcutta Leather Complex. A secured landfill site is also proposed.
5.
Jeedimetla (JETL) CETP: Colored and high TDS effluents from different dye and dye intermediate and chemical industries are received by this CETP. The quantity of effluent received is about 1000-1200 m3/D. It provides chemical flocculation as primary treatment, storage at buffer tank and followed by biological oxidation after mixing with municipal sewage with the ratio of 1:1.6. The CETP has been successful in treating organic matter (BOD) but discharge more TDS into the sewage system that joins with Amberpet Sewage Treatment Plant. Although to a lesser extent Multi Stage Evaporator System was in operation, yet the CETP was discharging high TDS (15,000 mg/L) in the liquid effluent. Mixing of industrial effluent with sewage thus makes the total effluent unfit for use for irrigation.
Performance of Amberpet STP is not satisfactory. It merely allows the wastewater for two hours sedimentation and discharge. More than 50% of the received wastewater are bypassed in the unit and sold to the nearby farmers on charge basis by the Water and Sewerage Board. JETL also charged for discharging the treated effluent into the STP.
Patancheru (PETL) CETP: The CETP receives effluents mainly from pharmaceutical and other chemical industries and sewage of BHEL Township through tankers and operates a two-stage ASP system employing pure oxygen system. The pure oxygen storage facility exists with in the plan premises. Diffused Air Floatation (DAF) is the primary treatment, which removes suspended solids and part of organic and inorganic pollutants. Although the organic matter (BOD) treated to the satisfactory level, yet very high level of TDS generally escape the treatment process. APPCB has also allowed individual unit to discharge COD and TDS upto 15,000 mg/l into the CETPs. The reduction in TDS is to the extent of the industrial effluents are diluted by sewage. The TDS levels as high as 7000 mg/l are discharged into a small channel, although the disposal into a sewage treatment plant is in progress in the form of a pipeline. The hazardous sludge is dumped into the landfill site. APPCB shall either reconsider reducing the TDS limits for industrial discharge into the CETPs and /or installation of RO/Nano System followed by MSES so as to contain TDS at the CETP and thus protecting the water resources. Else it may turn out to be yet another Tirupur.
Bollaram CETP: This CETP has been closed down now. The CETP was having 24 members. Dr. Reddy Laboratory was one of the members and a major contributor to the
CETP. This unit set up its own ETP that became the main reason for closure of the CETP. All the member units have switched over to PETL or JETL.
There are 28 recognised industrial estates in Delhi. In order to mitigate the environmental hazards due to discharge of untreated effluents, the Honourble Supreme Court directed Delhi Govt. to build common effluent treatment plants (CETPs). The Delhi Government entrusted the work to Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC) who contracted with National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (NEERI) in 1996 for the design of CETPs for the industrial estates. NEERI proposed 15 CETPs, their designs and locations, some of them receiving wastewater from more than one industrial estate. Construction of ten CETPs has been completed, two is in progress and three are in abeyance.
A comprehensive performance evaluation of the CETPs of Delhi was taken up in two phases from June 27 to July 6 and from August 25 to 28, 2005 to assess their capability for effecting treatment at full capacity during their operation. NEERI carried out jar tests at each CETP to optimize the chemical doses before operation for performance evaluation. During the study, stage-wise performance of treatment was determined. The CETPs having physico-chemical treatment were studied at the full design surface loading rates of tube settlers, DMF and ACF beds but for 9 hours only. The Mangolpuri CETP, which employs biological process, was evaluated at half the design flow, which is the present flow. The plant is being operated at this flow on a continuous basis. Samples were collected after 2 hours of starting the run, every hour, for the next 7 hours except for Okhla Industrial Area CETP where the sampling had to be stopped after 4 hours due to non-availability of flow. Samples were collected at five points i.e. before equalization, after equalization, tube settler, DMF and ACF. The composite samples of effluent after equalization and final treated effluent, prepared on equal volume basis, were analyzed for various parameters as prescribed in treated effluent quality for CETPs. Samples collected at other two points i.e. after tube settler and DMF were analyzed for pH, BOD, COD, TSS and TDS. The main conclusions and recommendations of the CPCB study are as follows:
a.
GT Karnal Road, Mayapuri and Badli CETPs are meeting the notified standards.
Mangolpuri, SMA, Nangaloi, Wazirpur and Okhla I.A CETPs are not complying in terms of TDS only. Lawrence Road CETP is not complying in terms of BOD and SS. It is felt that
Lawrence Road CETP was not able to meet the standards in terms of BOD due to high level of organic matter in the influent
b.
DMF and ACF units were included in the CETPs to improve the effluent quality
beyond what is required under the notified standards. It was observed that in general the performance of these units was sub-optimal.
c.
the TSS concentration after the tube settler. If 100 mg/L TSS concentration is assumed as a practical limit in the effluent from the tube settler, Mangolpuri, Okhla I. A. and SMA CETPs failed this criterion. This indicates that there is scope for improvement of the performance of tube settlers by optimizing the chemical doses and flocculation. The sub-level performance of the tube settlers could also be due to in sufficient cleaning of the tubes, improper sludge withdrawal or short-circuiting in the tank, which can be investigated.
d.
The advanced level treatment units, dual media filter (DMF) and activated carbon
adsorption (ACA) bed, are meant to polish the final effluent. Removal of TSS by DMF reduces not only the TSS in the final effluent but also its BOD and COD concentration, which is associated with the organic fraction of TSS. The ACA is used to remove trace organics, such as pesticides, phenols, etc., and heavy metals, which escape the primary treatment. It is seen that wherever the TSS input to the DMF is more than 100 mg/L the final effluent also has a high TSS concentration. Likewise, the ACA bed also should not be loaded with bulk organic matter. It seems that wherever the input COD to DMF is more than 100 mg/L, the BOD and COD of the final effluent is more than that which is expected from advanced level treatment units (COD<30 mg/L). Application of large amounts of COD to ACA bed would also result in an early exhaustion of its treatment capacity.
e.
The TDS concentration of the effluents is mainly due to the inorganic ions in the
water supply and those added during the use of water. The chemical treatment adopted in the treatment scheme does not specifically aim at removing these ions, except that which is incidental to neutralization. Therefore any appreciable change in the in the TDS concentration of the effluent during its treatment is not seen. The TDS concentration in the influent to the Wazirpur, Mangolpuri, Jhilmil, Okhla I.A. and SMA CETPs is more than 3,000 mg/L high and consequently the final does not meet the prescribed limit of 2,100 mg/L.
f.
The effluent of the CETPs meet the standards for heavy metals, which were
determined and cyanide, for both irrigation and discharge in surface waters.
Wazirpur CETP(24 MLD: The wastewater from the industrial estate is collected in an open drain near the CETP. The flow in the drain was measured to be around 35 MLD. DJB has laid a new conveyance system for industrial effluent but it has not been commissioned because the terminal pumping station is yet to be constructed by DSIDC. A large JJ slum cluster having around 50,000 inhabitants also contributes wastewater. This flow should be segregated. In case the flow to the CETP, after segregation of flows from non-industrial origin is found to be more than 24 MLD, which is the design capacity of the CETP, the plant capacity should be augmented.
Mangolpuri CETP (2.4 MLD): About 1.2 MLD effluent was reaching CETP. Effluent from both Phase I and Phase II is reaching the CETP. Activated sludge process is used but effluent from both PST and SST contains a high concentration of SS.
Mayapuri CETP (24 MLD): About 6 MLD effluent was reaching CETP. Sewage from residential localities other than Mayapuri industrial area has been now diverted. Drains in Mayapuri area were under construction; more flow is expected from the area.
Lawrence Road CETP (12 MLD): About 2 MLD effluent was reaching the CETP.About 3 MLD flow was estimated flowing in several open drains leading to Sahkurbasti drain.
Jhilmil CETP (16.8 MLD): About 2 MLD effluent was reaching the CETP from Jhilmil industrial area. DJB had laid a new conveyance system in the Friends Colony industrial area but was yet to be fully connected to CETP. Conveyance system had not been laid in few lanes of the Friends Colony industrial area. A cluster of industries North of GT road near Sansar factory was still not connected to the CETP.
Badli CETP (12 MLD): A new conveyance system for the area had been laid. The flow in the main drain was 3.0 MLD. At a number of places in the collection system the pH of the effluent varied between 2 and 6 indicating that the individual ETPs of some units where pH correction and separation of sludge is carried out were not working. The old collection system was severely damaged due to the acidic effluents. There was water logging and ponding of effluents at several places
Okhla Industrial Area CETP (24 MLD): About 2 MLD effluent was reaching the CETP. Effluent from industries of Phase I from industries located on west side of the Sarita Vihar
drain was being discharged into Sarita Vihar drain. Untapped effluent also flows in an open drain near Z-Block in Phase II. It is estimated that if total effluent generated from Phase I and Phase II is tapped then more flow will reach CETP.
GT Karnal Road CETP (6 MLD): About 3 MLD effluent was reaching the CETP. Most of the industries were connected to conveyance system.
SMA CETP (12 MLD): Only 0.5 to 1.0 MLD flow was reaching the CETP, which was to receive effluent from SMA, SSI and Rajasthan Udyog Nagar industrial areas. Most of the drains in the industrial areas were choked and the effluent was seeping into the ground. Large-scale water logging was observed on roads and open spaces in SSI and SMA industrial areas. There were large cesspools on both sides of the Delhi-Panipat railway line.
Nangaloi CETP (12 MLD): The CETP was receiving effluents from Udyog Nagar and Nangloi industrial area and was operational with 1.5 MLD flow. Some units of Nangloi industrial area and Udyog Nagar industrial area were discharging effluent on the railway land and in an open unlined drain. It is expected that once the collection system is cleaned and made operational the flow will increase.
Kundli CETP, Sonipat: Kondli CETP at Industrial Estate-Kundli treats effluents from Milk/food processing, textile dyeing, rubber, and leather units. The treated effluent is discharged into municipal drain and the sludge is kept within the CETP premises. Influent flow was low, about 60% of the designed flow. More polluted wastewater was received at CETP but by-passed. Plant achieved designed efficiency but on very high cost due to high energy consumption. The inlet feed pump not commensurate with actual (less flow). O&M cost is neither agreed nor paid by the members. With members backing out the plant actually receives only sewage, Onsite testing facility not available although space exists. The O& M Cost had increased phenomenally. The Industries Association non-existent, primary responsibility of CETP operation was at stake. Member units were (practically) backing out from CETP. Untreated or partially treated wastewater from (member) industries received at CETP was by-passed where as their combined sewage is treated
Most of the CETPs in Gujarat and Maharashtra were non-compliant to prescribed norms mainly due to various shortfalls occurred right from designing stage to operational stage of CETPs. Few of them are discussed below.
Influent characteristics and hydraulic load are not representative of actual design criteria. For example, in Vapi, Gujarat the design concentration of influent COD is 1000mg/l but actual influent concentration of COD is more than 3000mg/l. This has happened mainly due to improper database, industries were not responsive in database preparation at design stage of CETP. Also frequent change of product particularly in small-scale sector is another serious problem in maintaining influent characteristics as per design criteria of CETP. Similar trend is observed in case of other CETPs too.
Many important parameters like NH3 N, Phenol and other toxicants including heavy metals were not included into the design aspects of CETP, resulting in improper treatment and noncompliance of prescribed norms. Toxic effluents some time destroy whole biomass of CETP.
Most of the CETPs particularly in Gujarat were commissioned within a short period of time without conducting proper treatability study of influent. It is indeed another major shortfall in designing a proper and effective CETP.
Modular design of ETP is an important concept in proper handling of variable hydraulic load. Unfortunately, except in few CETPs, no CETP has modular arrangement.
Due to absence of adequate equalization capacity and guard pond, CETPs are not able to contain shock load. To avoid such shock load CETPs are forced to bypass its effluent without any treatment. However, many CETPs off late either augmenting their existing equalization tank or commissioning additional equalization tank to handle shock load.
Due to improper operation of CETPs by unskilled or semiskilled operator, flooding of clarifiers, irregular removal of sludge from clarifiers, improper level of MLVSS in aeration
tank, overloading of sludge drying beds etc are the common phenomenon in CETPS. Entire system sometimes gets halt because of such poor maintenance.
Vapi CETP (Gujrat): At the time of inspection of the plant on 03.01.2005 the treated effluent was not meeting the standards in terms of BOD, COD, TDS, NH3-N, SO4 and Chlorides. Effluent was overflowing from sludge beds and housekeeping was poor.
Nandesari CETP (Gujrat): At the time of inspection of the plant on 20/21.09.2004, the treated effluent was meeting the standards in terms of pH, BOD and TSS but COD, Chlorides, SO4 and TDS were exceeding the limit. COD level (295 mg/L) was slightly higher than standard of 250 mg/l. The sludge drying beds were found full. The effluent collection system is not fool proof.
Ankleshwar CETP (Gujrat): At the time of inspection of the plant on 18/19.11.2004, the treated effluent was meeting the standards in terms of pH, BOD, COD, and TSS but TDS was exceeding the limit. Besides, NH3-N level (56 mg/L) was also beyond limit of 50 mg/L The sludge was being dumped in open yard with impervious layer. The effluent collection system is not fool proof. Special measures for reduction for NH3-N and TDS are required. Sachin (0.5 MLD) CETP (Gujrat): At the time of inspection of the plant on 11.01.2005, the treated effluent was meeting the standards in terms of pH, BOD, COD and TSS but TDS was exceeding the limit. The effluent collection system is not fool proof.
Sachin (50 MLD) CETP (Gujrat): At the time of inspection of the plant on 11.01.2005, only primary treatment units were operational whereas the secondary treatment units are under commissioning. The final effluent was not meeting the standards in terms of BOD, COD, TDS and Chlorides.
Sarigum CETP (Gujrat): At the time of inspection of the plant on 3/4.01.2005, the treated effluent was not meeting the standards in terms of BOD, COD, TDS and NH3-N. effluent collection system is not fool proof and therefore the plant receives very less flow. The
Dhareshwar CETP (Gujrat): At the time of inspection of the plant on 19.01.2005, the treated effluent was not meeting the standards in terms of BOD and COD. CETP does not have laboratory facility. The effluent collection system is not fool proof.
Jetpur CETP (Gujrat): The plant receives 70% industrial effluent from member units and 30% city sewage. At the time of inspection of the plant on 19.01.2005, the treated effluent was not meeting the standards in terms of BOD, COD, TSS, TDS and NH3-N. CETP does not have laboratory facility. The effluent collection system is not fool proof.
Panoli CETP (Gujrat): At the time of inspection of the plant on 23/24.09.2004, the treated effluent was not meeting the standards in terms of BOD, COD, TSS, TDS, Chlorides, and NH3-N. The sludge was being dumped in open land with impervious layer. The effluent collection system is not fool proof.
Dombivelli CETP Phase-I (Maharashtra): At the time of recent inspection of the plant on 17.02.2005, the sludge drying beds were found full and there was no space left for fresh sludge. Leakages of effluent were also observed from secondary clarifier and pipeline conveying effluent to bio filter. Over-all house keeping was unsatisfactory.
Dombivelli CETP Phase-II (Maharashtra): At the time of recent inspection of the plant on 17.02.2005, the surface aerators were being replaced therefore samples collected are not representative of normal operation conditions.
Thane-Belapur CETP (Maharashtra): At the time of recent inspection of the plant on 16.02.2005, the treated effluent was meeting the standards in terms of pH, BOD, COD, and TSS but TDS was exceeding the limit. Besides, NH3-N level (63 mg/L) was also beyond limit of 50 mg/L even though NH3-N level in raw effluent was only 43 mg/L. Tarapur CETP (Maharashtra): At the time of last inspection of the plant on 26/27.10.2004, the treated effluent was not meeting the standards in terms of COD, TSS, TDS, NH3-N and SO4. Inspecting team also suspected dilution of waste with fresh water by operating agency. Taloja CETP (Maharashtra): At the time of recent inspection of the plant on 16.02.2005, the treated effluent was not meeting the standards in terms of BOD, COD, TSS, TDS, NH3-N, Chlorides and SO4 . At the time of inspection, two surface aerators were under maintenance therefore samples collected are not representative of normal operation conditions. The plant does not have auxiliary power supply.
Govindpura CETP (MP): At the time of monitoring of the plant on 24/25.11.2004, the the treated effluent was not meeting the standards in terms of BOD, COD and TSS. One brewery unit contributes about 995 KLD of wastewater. In the treatment scheme, no sludge drying beds have been provided and no secondary settling tank has been employed after aeration tank, the terminal treatment unit. Modifications in treatment scheme seem necessary. The plant does not have auxiliary power supply.
Phillore CETP: The Phillore CETP uses anaerobic filter followed by ASP for treatment of effluent mainly from tannery units and have an inflow capacity of 0.035 MLD. The CETP is located at Ramdaspura Noormahal Road Phillore in Jalandhar District. 28 units are the members of the CETP. The treated effluent goes to STP-Phillore and the sludge is being kept within the CETP premises. Dr Ambedkar Leather Association is running the CETP. The capital cost in 1996 was 28 lakhs.
Jalandhar CETP: The ASP based Jalandhar CETP at Leather Complex Jalandhar has an inflow of 1.5 MLD for treatment of effluent mainly from tannery units. The treated effluent is discharged into open drain (Kala Singha) and the sludge is being disposed of indiscriminately. PSIEC is entrusted with the operation, and maintenance of the CETP. The Jalandhar CETP is currently under stabilization as it was closed for over two years. The CLRI recommended construction of Primary Effluent Treatment Plants (PETPs). 29 units are the members of the CETP. Many units do not have PETPs and some are also not operating them properly. Most of them are not capable of complying prescribed primary standards as per CLRI. Some of the tannery units are also refusing to obtain consent under the Water Act. There is a mismatch in the estimated and actual wastewater generation from individual units. The PSIEC also does not own any responsibility to operate the plant so as to comply the prescribed standards. The matter is sub-judice in reference to Civil Writ Petition No CWP No 5307 of 2000 in the Honble Punjab and Haryana High Court filed by the member units of CETP. Most of the industries are operational and highly polluted combined wastewater from tanneries is discharged, into a municipal drain (Kala Singha drain), which ultimately meets R. Satluj. It was understood that in the 20 km stretch of the drain the wastewater is partly utilized in irrigation by farmers. This brings up a very serious environmental situation. Punjab
Pollution Control Board should plead with the Honble High Court of Punjab and Haryana for taking cognizance of hazards associated with discharge of untreated tannery wastewater. Till
such time the case is resolved, the industries are required to either completely closedown or immediately stop chrome tanning.
Balotra CETP: CETP Balotra is of 6 MLD capacity, however it received 12 MLD influent. As a result, 6 MLD was being discharged directly in to the river, without any treatment. The reason for inadequate capacity is the increase in the number of water polluting industries to 600 from 319 at the time when the feasibility study was conducted by NEERI. Majority of industries are cotton textile processing units comprising mainly of dyeing and printing. The major process are desizing, scouring, bleaching, mercerizing, dyeing, printing and finishing. The cost of Rs.2.95 crores was borne by the trust with the help of Ministry of Textiles. No grant was availed from MoEF. The CETP has been operated and maintained by Balotra Water Pollution Control & Research Foundation Trust (BWPCRFT). The BWPCRFT is establishing another 12 MLD CETP (Physico-chemical treatment + biological) at Balotra. It was in initial stage of construction.
The CETP was not achieving the designed efficiency level. The CETP was not initially designed with O&G separator. The O&G separator had been added to the CETP but was not working properly. There were two floating type aerators provided in the equalization tank but were not working properly. Effluent from primary and secondary settling tanks mostly over flowed because of launder problem resulting into total submergence of weirs. The launders overflow goes to the aeration tank. Waste papers and foam goes to the flocculator and not cleaned regularly. During the power cut the CETP does not run, as there is no backup. Chemical and biological sludge is removed once in a day. Both types of sludges were
dumped together, all the sludge drying beds were full, the dried sludge was dumped unscientifically within the CETP premises and covered with a polythene partially.
Jasol CETP: The Jasol CETP was not commissioned till during December 2004 when last inspected. The 2.5 MLD CETP was constructed for treating wastewater from the 60 textile dyeing and printing industries by Jasol Water Polluting Control & Treatment Trust with a capital cost of Rs.2.89 crores. It was a 100% grant. The CETP was designed by NEERI and construction and commissioning by Air Effodetox Incineration Ltd., Mumbai. It was commissioned on 15.10.2004 for trial run with the DG set for three days. Permanent
electrical connection from the State Electricity Board was awaited. The entire industrial effluent was being discharged in to the Luni River without any treatment. commissioning of the plant was expected by the end of January 2005. The
Bithuja CETP: The Bithuja CETP was not commissioned till during December 2004 when last inspected. The 30 MLD CETP was under construction for treating the effluent from 161 textile bleaching and mercerizing units at Bithuja Industrial Area. The capital cost has been estimated as 11.5 crorers. The treatment system consists of screen chamber, grit chamber, equalization tank, primary settling, sludge drying beds and waste stabilization ponds. The effluent was being discharged in to river Luni without any treatment.
Jodhpur CETP: The 20 MLD CETP at Sangaria has been established by Jodhpur Pradushan Niwaran Trust at a cost of Rs.10.0 crores at Industrial Area, jodhpur to treat the wastewater from 150 textile units and 100 stainless steel rolling mills. The CETP was
designed by NEERI, construction and commissioned by Hydro Air Technonic Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai. It was commissioned in July 2004, but could not be stabilized due to faulty blower till December 2004 when last inspected. As a result it was not being operated continuously. The treatment system consists of screen chamber, grit chamber, separate equalization tanks for acidic and alkaline waste, flash mixer, clariflocculator, aeration tank (diffused aerators), secondary settling tank, sand and activated carbon filters and sludge decanter. Separate channels have been constructed for carrying wastewater from textile units to CETP. Closed pipeline has been laid for carrying wastewater from rolling mills (stainless steel) to CETP. The effluent flow measured was 12 MLD. Alkaline to acidic effluent flow was in the ratio of 3:1. pH of alkaline effluent was 8 and that of acidic effluent was 1.
Bhiwadi CETP: The Bhiwadi CETP with a capacity of 6 MLD has been provided by RIICO in RIICO Industrial Area for the treatment of combined industrial and domestic wastewater. As estimated, 2.5 MLD of industrial effluent will be treated along with 3.5 MLD of domestic effluent. Around 50-55 industries will be contributing its effluent to CETP along with domestic effluent from the industrial area as well as from the city. On the day of inspection, the CETP was under trial run. The CETP was likely to be handed-over to RIICO by November 2004.
Pali CETPs: There are three CETPs in pali having installed capacity 23 MLD were treating about 9 MLD mixed industrial waste and sewage, and still about 10-20% of the effluent generated from Pali city was being discharged without any treatment. At the time of inspection on 03.07.2002 CETP Unit-I was found closed since March 2000 due to unknown reasons and capacity utilization for both Unit-II and Unit-III was 60% only. More than 50% of the effluent reaching CETP I & II was being let out through the emergency outlet to join the River Bandi. There was no proper arrangement for safe disposal of about 300 MT/month hazardous sludge and it was being dumped at Puniyata road near CETP-III. Treated effluents of CETPs were not meeting the standards.
Machheri CETP, Jaipur: The Machheri CETP was closed during inspection because the five member tanneries, which process raw hides had been closed by SPCB on account of not providing the primary treatment for soak liquor. Biomass was being developed for restart of the CETP. There are 9 tanneries connected to CETP, four processing wet blues to finished leather only. There was no arrangement for disposal of hazardous sludge.
There are thirty-three CETPs in Tamil Nadu. During the current financial year, a total of 26 CETP(s) in Tirupur, Karur and Vellore districts in Tamil Nadu were monitored. The salient features highlighting issues connected to CETP(s) are listed as below:
i.
A total of eight CETP(s) handle the industrial waste waters from 281 units (Textile) with
capacities ranging from 1.5 to 10 MLD and discharge the treated waste waters into river Noyyal which ultimately gets impounded in Orathupalayam dam. The dam water is meant to be used as irrigation water.
ii.
The results of analysis clearly show that the CETP(s) have been designed towards
primary treatment only using lime, alum and poly-electrolytes as coagulation agents.
iii. The incoming TDS in the ETP range between 6000-9000 mg/l and slight increase was noticed in the treated effluents, perhaps due to soluble fractions of coagulants during treatment. As such CETP(s) remove only the colour and other suspended organic matter.
iv. As against standard (2100 mg/l) for TDS, the existing TDS levels above 5000 mg/l is a severe gross violation. The Noyyal River and ground water survey in Tirupur shows that TDS has grossly contaminated the waters. As such the water is not fit for irrigation in the downstream stretches.
v.
The CETP(s) remove only 40% of the COD, BOD and most of the time the BOD of the
treated waste waters is above 100 mg/l as against limiting standard of 30 mg/l for discharge into river waters. This is yet another non-compliance by the CETP(s).
vi. It is generally seen that Sodium (Na+) and Chloride (Cl-) ions dominate in the wastewaters indicating use of common salt (NaCl) in the dyeing processes. Relatively lower levels of Sulphates (SO4--) indicate that Sodium Sulphate (Na2SO4) is used to a much lesser extent.
vii. Generally Sodium Chloride is recoverable (50-70%) from Dye bath solutions using nano filtration membranes and recovered Brine is reusable in dyeing processes along with low hardness water recovered through Reverse Osmosis processes. Almost 33 individual Units are in the process of installing R.O./Nano Systems followed by Multi Stage evaporator systems (MSES) to attain zero discharge from these Units.
viii. In order to reverse the ecological damages in the area, the existing CETP(s) shall also require upgradation in terms of R.O/Nano systems followed by MSES to constrain high TDS discharges into the river. The approximate expenditure towards this has been worked out as high as 126 crores Indian Rupees and almost 35 crores for routing operation and maintenance of these systems.
ix. It is worthwhile to mention that all the CETP(s) in Tamil Nadu has enjoyed part funding from Government of India (MoEF) and failed to keep pollution under control.
x.
South Zonal Office of CPCB is interacting with companies that may deliver 97% of NaCl
recovery which shall help in alleviating the need for a MSES (which is expensive to operate) in CETP(s).
Yet another 8 Nos of CETP(s) are in operation at Karur where primarily yarn dyeing is prevailing. The treated effluents are being discharged into river Amaravati basin, which is a tributary to river Cauvery. The salient features are given below:
i)
The design of CETP(s) is similar to that of CETP(s) in Tirupur and as such fail to
constrain TDS during treatment process. Though not many complaints are arising from the area, yet the ground and surface waters may be subjected to gradual increase in TDS and shortly the Tirupur scenario could be repeated.
ii)
An action plan as a preventive strategy shall be formulated and implemented on the lines
of CETP(s) at Tirupur by TNPCB. The common salt (NaCl) recovered shall be reusable in the dye house.
iii) Huge quantities of hazardous CETP sludges are being stored in CETP premises that require safe disposal.
There are 10 nos of CETP(s) in operation in the Vellore district and handling industrial effluents from Tannery sector and discharging treated effluents in Palar river basin. There is no water flow in River Palar at present due to construction of many water reservoirs across the tributaries in AP and Karnataka. Due to high permeability of riverbed, the treated effluents infiltrate into the soil and almost little (or no) discharge is visible in the river. The salient features are listed as below:
i)
Generally there are three types of wastewater from tanneries i.e soaking effluent, Soaking wastewater containing high TDS is
ii)
It is reported that about 600 and odd numbers of tannery units are in operation in the
District of Vellore. Most of the tanneries are linked with CETPs and some are having individual effluent treatment plants. The effluents are generally high in TDS and BOD and CETP(s) also receives chromium in significant concentrations. iii) The designed capacities of the CETPs are ranging from 1000 m3/D to 4400 m3/D. The CETP comprising collection/equalization tank, Chemical flocculation, primary clarifier, anaerobic lagoon/aeration tank, secondary clarifier and sludge filter (Mechanical filter). Some of the CETPs are having centralized solar evaporation systems for evaporating high TDS effluents and some are having Chrome Recovery Plant (CRP).
iv) Only a few CETPs are meeting the standards in terms of BOD and none of the CETPs are meeting the standard in terms of TDS as stipulated by Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board. None of the CETPs have been issued either Consent Order or direction by TNPCB.
v) As per the direction of Honble Supreme Court, all the units generating the sludge out of ETP operation should be disposed with in the premises by providing a secured land fill as per
the guidelines and norms stipulated by CPCB. But none of the CETPs which were monitored had the secured land fill. Hazardous waste disposal facilities were not found scientifically sound. Chromium containing wastes had been dumped in unscientific manner that have to be taken to secured landfill. Common TSDF is required for this purpose.
Kanpur CETP The USAB based Kanpur CETP at Jajmau has an inflow capacity of 36 MLD mainly treats tannery effluent. 334 units are the members of the CETP. The treated effluent is used for irrigation and disposed in Ganga River. The sludge is disposed on land. Sludge lifting by Kanpur Nagar Nigam is highly irregular and mostly dumped near the by-pass channel leading to River Ganga. The CETP is being run by UP Jal Nigam. Although the plant is operational but is not being maintained properly. Untreated sewage gets bypassed to Ganga River. Pumps at central sewage pumping station were not being properly operated and maintained. Pumps in tannery conveyance system were not regularly operated during power cut for want of diesel. 10 out of 13 pumps are non operational. Plant operates on less than 70% treatment efficiency. Tannery effluent to sewage (T: S) blending ratio is disturbed from 1:3 to 1:1.5. The capacity of the plant is only partially utilized as only 28 % of the designed flow reaches the plant. The PETPs at individual units are not working properly resulting in high Cr and SS. Also some units are not paying O & M costs. The plant is in state of poor economy due to non / irregular payment of O & M cost by State Govt. Due to heavy power shortage (load shedding for 5 hrs) plant as well as pumping stations remain non-operational. This results in discharge of untreated tannery wastewater into River Ganga
Unnao CETP The Activate Sludge Process based Unnao CETP at Site-II, UPSIDC Indl Area has an inflow 2.15 MLD. It mainly treats tannery waste. Only 21 units are the members of the CETP. The treated effluent is discharged into municipal drain (Loni) and the sludge was being kept within the CETP premises. The Unnao Tanneries Pollution Control Co was running the CETP. Plant achieves designed efficiency. PETPs in some units were not operated properly. Inspite of all the required units having CRPs, the plant at times received high Chromium in raw wastewater. Innovative efforts on pilot scale (Phyto-remediation of hazardous sludge) were made for better performance. Disposal of sludge requires additional space and also considerable improvement, as it was not in proper shape.
Mathura CETP The Activate Sludge Process based Mathura CETP at Mathura Indl Area has an inflow capacity of 6.25 MLD. It mainly treats effluents form Textiles (Cotton) dying/printing units. Only 30 units are the members of the CETP. The treated effluent is discharged into municipal drain and the sludge was being kept within the CETP premises. The Mathura Industrial Area Pollution. Control Co. Ltd was running the CETP. The capital cost in 1997 was 188 lakhs
Inlet flow is low, about 70% of the designed flow. Plant is operational but on less than 50% efficiency. Plant operation is not proper. Equipment downtime is long. Conveyance system is in bad shape. Significant content of floating oil was observed in raw wastewater. Onsite testing facility is not in operational state since long even though space and equipment exist. Hazardous solid waste is indiscriminately disposed of by the member units. Cost of treatment has increased significantly from Rs 0.74/Kl. to approx Rs. 12/Kl.
Calcutta Leather Complex (CLC) i. Calcutta Leather Complex (CLC) having an area of 1100 acres is located at Karaidanga,
Bantala is a full-fledged proposed leather manufacturing areas with all its related hide/skin processing units, allied chemical manufacturing units coupled with other infrastructure facilities. The leather complex is proposed to cater for about 540 - 550 tannery units, which are presently scattered in the city and housed mainly in the dense urban locality of TangraTopsia-Tiljala areas. Besides this, some new tanneries are also setting up their units in the complex. The shifting of tanneries from their present location to the new complex is in progress and it was reported that about 230 - 240 units have already either constructed or being constructed their shed and are yet to start their operation and production.
ii.
In the leather complex, it was roughly estimated that about 1000 MT of raw hides will be
processed thereby generating more or less 30 MLD of polluted liquid effluent. For the treatment of 30 MLD wastewater from the whole complex, six modules of Common Effluent Treatment Plant of capacity 5 MLD each was proposed. It was also decided that Four Modules will be constructed and commissioned by the West Bengal State Government through Kolkata Metropolitan Development Authority (KMDA) and the rest Two will be managed by the BOT Party i.e. Dalmia & Co.
iii. The modules 1 & 2 had been already commissioned by the State Government, reportedly in March 2004, whereas the construction of other two modules 3 & 4 were in advanced stage
and were expected to be commissioned by January 2005. For want of influent, the modules 1 & 2 were not in operation. It was observed that for the module 5 & 6 (to be constructed by Dalmia & Co), construction has been started.
iv. The effluent treatment system for all the six modules will be identical in design. Modules 1 & 2 were already constructed and consists of Equalization (in 2 compartments with diffused aeration), Primary Clarifier, Diffused Aeration (in 3 compartments) and Secondary Clarifier in each module.
v.
The treated effluent is designed to be discharged to Storm Water Channel (SW Channel),
which meets River Vidyadhari at a distance of about 15 kms from the area. The river ultimately meets the Bay of Bengal.
vi. For the management of Sludge, provision of Sludge Thickener (Filter Press) and also 12 Sludge Drying Beds (SDBs) as standby had been commissioned for the module 1 & 2 and was seen under trial operation. There are six filter presses for each module and each filter press was seen having 75 plates. The filter presses were designed to operate for 8 cycles/day having 2 hours cycle operation and sludge filtering capacity of 3.2 MT/day/module.
vii. For storing the Sludge (hazardous waste), a hazardous waste landfill facility will be developed in 51 acres of land, for which Draft Project Report (DPR) was also submitted by Central Leather Research Institute (CLRI). As this will take time, a temporary arrangement of secured land filling is under construction in the CETP premises for storing the sludge for about 5000 m3 6000 m3.
viii. For the transportation of effluent from the member tannery units, 8 numbers of Effluent Pumping Stations (EPS) have been made. From the pumping stations effluent will be lifted to the Common Holding Tank already constructed near the CETP of capacity 30 MLD. The 5 pipelines from the 5 EPS managed by KMDA leading to the common holding tank (total designed flow 20 MLD). have been commissioned. The rest 3 pumping lines from the 3 EPS of total flow 10 MLD is yet to be constructed by Dalmia & Co.
ix. For the Chrome tanned leather-manufacturing units, a common Chrome Recovery Unit (CRU) is under process of installation. The total capacity will be 360 m3 in 3 modules for 109 interested member tanneries, which are chromium Sulfate consuming units. The other chrome tanning units will install chrome recovery units on their own The 2 modules of 120 m3 capacity each CRU are being constructed near the Common Holding Tank.
x.
As the tannery units have not yet started their operation and moreover, as the connecting
pipelines to the main Trunk from the individual member units have not yet been joined, the CETP is not getting any effluent till date and becoming non-functional.
6.
6.1
RECOMMENDATIONS
In general, the performance of CETPs has been found to be very unsatisfactory, largely because of poor operation and maintenance. Therefore, the State Pollution Control Boards should conduct regular monitoring of CETPs and persuade them to ensure proper operation and maintenance failing which they should initiate action against negligent agencies and wilful defaulters.
6.2
Achieving standards for treated effluent quality from CETPs is dependent on meeting the designed criteria of inlet quality to the CETPs that inter alia depends on effluent quality from each industry. The State Pollution Control Boards are required to prescribe standards for discharge effluent to CETP from each industry and enforce the same.
6.3
Optimization of neutralizing/coagulating chemicals is very important for deriving maximum benefits from primary treatment units based on physico-chemical treatment, minimizing sludge production and reducing pollutants load on subsequent biological treatment units. Jar tests should be conducted on daily basis to decide type of coagulant and their dozing.
6.4
CETP operating agencies should engage experts to advice them from time to time for proper operation and maintenance of CETP besides employing skilled manpower.
6.5
High TDS in the raw influent reaching CETPs and, as a result, in treated effluent of CETPs is a major cause of concern, more so because it is generally caused by high salinity which requires costly treatments such as Reverse Osmosis (RO) and Nano Filtration Systems followed by Multi Stage evaporator systems (MSES). Area specific thoughtful approach is required to tackle this problem. First attempt should be reduction in release of TDS contributing chemicals from problem industries by adopting cleaner production technologies and recovery and recycling of chemicals from the waste streams. Second option should be treatment of waste stream for TDS at the level of individual industry. Treatment of TDS at the CETP should be the last option unless some special conditions demand so. State Pollution Control Boards should investigate all the TDS related problem areas and compel the industries/CETPs for its solution.
6.6
The State Pollution Control Boards may consider prescribing location specific regulations for the control of TDS at the industry level. Setting time limits in future for compliance of new regulations, compliance of which requires significant investment, is an industry-friendly and
effective approach. The same approach is suggested for prescribing location specific regulations for the control of TDS at the industry level.
6.7
Capability and limitations of filter unit in a wastewater treatment scheme, as explained in section 3.11, must be kept in mind while using these units wherever they exist in CETPs
6.8
Capability and limitations of activated carbon bed, as explained in section 3.12, must be considered while including it as a terminal treatment unit in wastewater treatment. In treatment schemes that already include activated carbon bed as terminal treatment unit, the dependence on this unit should be based accordingly.
6.9
Operation of treatment units based on biological treatment (Activated Sludge Process) is sensitive and requires understanding of important controlling parameters. Use of Solid Retention Time (SRT), the ratio of solids in the system and solids wasted per day, as controlling parameter is recommended because it is most simple and treatment efficiency, sludge production, oxygen requirements and nutrients requirements are dependent on SRT.
6.10 Collection of wastewater from individual industries through tankers is not a foolproof system and should be discouraged in new areas and reviewed and rectified in old ones by the SPCBs unless it is technically impossible.
ANNEXURE
Table 1 CETPs capacity, year of establishment, capital cost and related information
S. No. CETP Capacity MLD Year of Establishment April 1989 Capital cost, lac* Name/address of CETP/company
AP Jeedimetla CETP Pattancheru CETP Bollaram CETP Delhi Wazirpur CETP Mangolpuri CETP Mayapuri CETP Lawrence Road CETP Jhilmil CETP Badli CETP Okhla Indl Area CETP GTK Road CETP SMA CETP Nangloi CETP Narela CETP Gujrat Naroda CETP, Ahmedabad Vatva CETP, Ahmedabad
7.5
1989
0.25
1994
98(G) + 158(M)+ 125(L) 89(G) + 259(M)+ 380(L) 87(G) + 52(M)+ 82(L) 1834.26 603.91 1117.99 937.64
Jeetimetla Effluent Treatment Plant Limited (JETL) , Hyderabad Pattancheru Effluent Treatment Plant Limited (PETL), Medak District, AP Progressive Effluent Treatment Ltd., S.F. 284/2, Bollaram(V), Jinnaram Mandal, Distt. Medak Wazirpur industrial area CETP society, Wazirpur industrial area, Delhi Mangolpuri industrial area CETP society, Mangolpuri industrial area, Delhi Mayapuri industrial area CETP society, Mayapuri industrial area, Delhi Keshavpuram Industrial Area CETP Society (Regt.), C-42/A, Keshavpuram Industrial Area, (Lawrence Road ) Delhi- 1100335 Jhilmil industrial area CETP society, Jhilmil industrial area, Delhi Badli industrial area CETP society, Badli industrial area, Delhi Okhla industrial area CETP society, Okhla industrial area Phase I, Delhi GT Karnal road industrial area CETP society, GT Karnal road industrial area, Delhi SMA industrial area CETP society, SMA industrial area, Delhi Nagloi industrial area CETP society, Nagloi industrial area, Delhi DSIDC Naroda Enviro Project Ltd., CETP Division, Plot 512-515, Phase-1, Opp. Naroda Post Office, GIDC Estate Naroda, Ahmedabad The Green Environment Services Co-operative Society Ltd., Plot 224-251, Phase-II GIDC Estate, Vatva, Ahmedabad- 383445 Odhav Enviro Projects Limited, Plot 25, GIDC Estate Odhav, Ahmedabad- 382415 Vapi Waste & Effluent Management Co. Ltd, CETP, Ext Opp. UPL, GIDC Estate Vapi396195 Distt. Valsad Nandesari Industries Association, Plot 134/1 opp. Shopping Centre, Near GIDC office, GIDC Estate Nandesari- 391340, Distt. Vadodara Enviro Technology Ltd., Plot 2313-14, Ankleshwar GIDC Estate, Ankleshwar- 393002, Distt. Bharuch Globe Enviro Care Ltd. Plot No. PP/1, Off Road No. 2, B/h Kay Tex Mill, GIDC Sachin, Surat394230 Perfect Enviro Control Systems Ltd., Plot 731/A, GIDC Sarigram, Taluka Umargaon, Distt. Valsad396155 Shri dhareshwar GIDC Vistar Association, GIDC Estate Jetpur- 360370, Distt. Rajkot
1 2 3 4
24 2.4 12 12
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1
16.8 12 24 6 12 12
July 1999
598.2
16
April 1998
4401
Odhav CETP, Ahmedabad Vapi CETP, Vapi, Valsad Nandesari CETP, Vadodara Ankleshwar CETP Sachin CETP-I, Sachin, Surat Sarigam CETP, Sargam, Valsad Dhareswar CETP, Jetpur
1.20
360
55
2040
5.50
300
6 7
1 0.50
680.3 500
0.40
1994
0.15/0.05 5
1995
10
S. No.
CETP
10
11
Sanand CETP, Paldi, Ahmedabad Jetpur CETP, Jetpur Panoli CETP, Bharuch Padra CETP, Sachin CETP-II, Sachin, Surat GVMSAV Odhav CETP, Ahmedabad Narol CETP, Ahmedabad Haryana Kundli CETP Karnataka Pai & Pai CETP
Name/address of CETP/company
20
1989
125
12
I.00
13 14
15
1.0
Sanand Eco Projects Ltd, 3 Samast Brahma Kshatriya Society, Narayannagar Road Shantivan, Paldi, Ahmedabad- 380007 Shri Jetpur Dyeing and Printing Association, R. S. No. 782&783 Painky, Narsang Tekri, Jetpur, Distt. Rajkot Panoli Enviro Technology Ltd., Plot 620/2-C GIDC Estate Panoli, Taluka Ankleshwar, Dist. Bharuch393002 Enviro Infrastructure Co. Ltd., Umaraya, Tal. Padra, Sachin Infra Environment Ltd, Plot PP/2, Off Road No.2 B/h Kay Tex Mill, GIDC, Sachin, Surat, Gujrat Gujarat Vepari Mahamandal
16
0.1
2001
1.10
1999
76.9
HSIDC Industrial Estate Kundli, Kondli Dist. Sonipat, Haryana Pai & Pai Chemicals Private Ltd., Kumabalgod, Mysore Road, Bangalore Lidkar Tanners Enviro Control System Ltd., Lidkar CFC, Kudugondanahalli, Banglore- 560045 Dombivli Common Effluent Treatment Plant Phase-I, OS-8, Opp Tele exch., MIDC Dombivli (East) Dombivli Common Effluent TreatmentPlant,Plot no. R-4/2, Opposite W-40, MIDC, Phase-II, Dombivli (East), Mumbai- 421204 CETP (Thane-Belapur) Association, P-20, MIDC, Anand Bhadkamkar Common Facility Center MIDC Khairane, Thane- Belapur Road, Navi Mumbai- 400709 TIMA CETP Cooperative Society Ltd., Plot O/23(1), MIDC Tarapur, At post: Boisar, Distt. Thane- 401506 Taloja CETP Co-operative Society Ltd. Plot P-24, New Chemical Zone, MIDC Tajola, Navi Mumbai410208 ACMA CETP Co-operative Society Ltd. W-30, Chemical Zone, MIDC Ambarnath (W) Distt. Thane- 421501 L. K. Akiwale Co-operative Industrial Estate Jaisingpur, Akiwale Udhyamnagar, Tluka: Shirol, Distt.: Kolhapur- 416144 Patalganga and Rasayani Industries Association (PRIA) CETP, MIDC-Patalganga, taluka-Khopoli, distt. Raigad MMA CETP Association Badalpur Common Effluent Treatment Plant Association, Plot OS-4&5 MIDC Badalpur-421503 Distt Thane, Maharashtra ? Govindpura Audhyogic Kshetra Pradushan Nivaran Pvt Ltd, Govindpura Bhopal
0.3
1994
Lidkar Banglore CETP Maharashtra Dombiveli CETP Phase-I Dombiveli CETP Phase-II Thane Belapur CETP
July 1994
14
2003
1.5
March 1999
267
12
November 1997
400
Tarapur CETP
June 1994
309
Taloja CETP
10
616
0.25
35
47.94
15
700
9 10
7.5 8
355
11 1
? 0.9
? 2000
? 127
S. No.
CETP
Capacity MLD
Name/address of CETP/company
Punjab 1 Phillore CETP 0.035 28 Dr Ambedkar Leather Association Ramdaspura, Noormahal Rd. Phillore Dist Jalandhar, (Pun) PSIEC Leather Complex, Kapoorthala Rd. Jalandhar, Punjap
Jalandhar CETP
1.50
96
6.00
295
2 3
2.50 20.00
Bhiwadi CETP
5 6 7 8
Pali CETP Unit I Pali CETP Unit II Pali CETP Unit III Machheri CETP, Jaipur Tamilnadu Mannarai CETP, Tirupur Kashipalayam CETP, Tirupur Veerapondi CETP, Tirupur Manickapuram Pudur CETP, Tirupur Kunnangalpalay am CETP, Tirupur Andipalayam CETP, Tirupur Angeripalayam CETP, Tirupur Chinnakkarai CETP Ltd., Tirupur Andakovil CETP, Karur KS CETP, Karur KKEL CETP, Karur Sellandi Palayam CETP, Karur Thiruvai CETP, Karur Valandi Dyeing CETP, Karur Taluk Dye & Bleaching CETP, Karur
289 1000
Balotra Water Pollution Control & Research Foundation Trust, Balotra Industrial Area Phase I, Balotra, Distt. Barmer, Rajasthan Jasol Water Polluting Control & Treatment Jodhpur Pradushan Niwaran Trust, Sangaria Industrial Area, Jodhpur RIICO, CETP, RIICO Industrial Area, Bhiwadi, Rajasthan Pali Water Pollution Control Treatment Research Foundation, CETP, Mandia Road, Pali, Rajasthan Pali Water Pollution Control Treatment Research Foundation, CETP, Mandia Road, Pali, Rajasthan Pali Water Pollution Control Treatment Research Foundation, CETP, Mandia Road, Pali, Rajasthan Jaipur Leather Complex Environmental Protection Foundation Pvt. Ltd., RIICO Leather Complex, Manpura Macheri, Jaipur, Rajasthan M/s. Mannarai CETP Ltd., Tirupur M/s. Kasipalayam CETP Ltd., Tirupur M/s.Veerapondi CETP Ltd., Tirupur M/s.Manickapuram Pudur CETP Ltd., Tirupur
85
38
1 2 3 4
4.2 4 10 1.6
135.5(G)+ 108(M) 110(G) + 240(M) 336(G) + 384(M) 63.5(G) + 63.5(M) 108(G) + 108(M) 107.5(G) + 171.25(M)
4.25
1999
6 7 8
5 8.5 5
M/s. Andipalayam CETP Ltd., Tirupur M/s. Angeripalayam CETP Ltd., Tirupur
122.5(G) + 183(M
9 10 11
Karur Andakovil Effluent Treatment, Karur KS Common Effluent Treatment, Karur Karur Karuppampalayam Envirotech Ltd. (KKEL), Karur Karur Sellandi Palayam Pollution Control Ltd, Karur Karur Thiruvai Pollution Control Ltd, Karur Karur Valandi Dyeing Envirotech Ltd, Karur Karur Taluk Dye & Bleaching Effluent Treatment Plant Ltd, Karur
1.3
1999
12
13 14 15
2.1 ? ?
1999 ? ?
S. No.
CETP
16
17
18
19
Amaravathi Poll Tech CETP, karur TALCO Vaniyambadi, Valayampet, CETP, Vellore TALCO Vaniyambadi, Udayendiram CETP, Vellore TALCO Perinambut CETP TALCO Ambur Thuthipet CETP, Vellore Visharam CETP, Melvisharam Vellore TALCO Ranipet CETP, Vellore Melpudupet CETP, Ambur, Vellore Ambur Mallgalthope CETP, Vellore SIDCO Ranipet CETP, Vellore SIDCO phase II CETP Ranipet, Vellore TALCO Dindigul CETP TALCO Madhavaram CETP, Chennai Pallavaram CETP, Chennai UP Kanpur CETP Unnao CETP Mathura CETP West Bengal Calcutta Leather Complex CETP
Capital cost, lac* 122(G) + 32(M)+ 90(L) 189.25(G) + 33.25(M)+ 112.5(L) 30(G) + 40(M)
Name/address of CETP/company
2.8
May 1991
TALCO Vaniyambadi Enviro control systems Ltd, 183 Cutchery Road Extension, Valayampet, Vaniyambadi- 635754 TALCO Vaniyambadi Enviro control systems Ltd, 183 Cutchery Road Extension, Udayendiram, Vaniyambadi- 635754 TALCO Perinambut Tanners Effluent Treatment Co.,Ltd., Bakkalapalli Sector, No 299/A High Road, Pernambut- 635810 TALCO Ambur Tannery Effluent Treatment Co.Ltd. Post Box No. 21, Periyavarikkam, Thuthipet, Ambur- 635811 Distt. Vellore Visharam Tanners Enviro Control Systems Pvt Ltd, No. 306, 307, C, Abdul Hakeem Road, Melvisharam- 632509 Distt. Vellore TALCO Ranipet Tannery Effluent Treatment Co. Ltd., VC Mottor Village, Vennivedu Post, Walajah, Distt. Vellore- 632513 Melvisharam Tanners Effluent Treatment Co,Pvt Ltd.,Melpudupet Sector, Walajha taluk Ambur Tannery Effluent Treatment Co.Ltd. Kaspa Road, Ambur- 635802 Ranipet SIDCO Finished Leather Effluent Treatment Co.Pvt Ltd, Plot 199, SIDCO Industrial Estate, SIPCOT, Ranipet- 632403 SIPCOT & SIDCO phase II Entrepreneur Co Pvt Ltd, Ranipet TALCO Dindigul Tanners Enviro Control Systems Pvt Ltd, Batlagundu Bye Pass Road, Begambur Post, Dindigul- 624002 Madhavaram Leather Manufacturers Facility Pvt Ltd., H 3, TALCO Industrial Estate, Madhavaram, Chennai- 60 Pallavaram tanners Industrial Effluent Co. Ltd., 105, Anna Salai, Nagalkeni, Chromepet, Chennai44 UP Jal Nigam. Jajmau, Kanpur, UP Unnao Tanneries Pollution Control Co Site-II, UPSIDC Indl Area, Unnao, UP Mathura Industrial Area Pollution. Control Co SiteA, D-70, Industrial Area, Mathura, UP
0.2
January 1996
0.9
August 1995
20
21
3.4
22
23
24
1.1
25
2.5
26
27
2.5
28
0.4
29
1 2 3
6 mod. 2 modular units of 5 units -Mar MLD 04 each *(G):Govt. contribution, (M):Members contribution, (L):Loan
Table 2 CETPs treatment technologies and wastewater collection & disposal system
S. No. 1 CETP AP Jeedimetla CETP Capacity MLD 5 Technology/ Treatment Scheme Type of industries Effluent collection Tankers Effluent disposal Amberpet STP
Pattancheru CETP
7.5
Bollaram CETP
0.25
Eq. tanks (3) +flash mixer +Clariflocculator +Dissolved air flotation unit +Sewage mixing +Aeration tanks (6) +Secondary clarifiers and Sludge drying beds Eq. tanks +Dissolved air flotation unit Sewage mixing +Aeration tanks (Pure oxygen) (2) +Secondary clarifiers (2) and Sludge drying beds Eq. tanks +Pre-settling tank +Aeration tank-I +Secondary clarifier-I +Aeration tankII+Secondary clarifier-II +maturation Pond and Sludge lagoons Screen +Grit Ch. +Eq. tank +Flash mixer +Tube settlers +DM filter +ACF Screen +Grit Ch. +Eq. tank +PST +Aeratin tank +SST +DMF +ACF Screen +Grit Ch. +Eq. tank +Flash mixer +Tube settlers +DM filter +ACF Screen +Grit Ch. +Eq. tank +F. Mixer +Flocculator +Tube settlers +DMF +ACF Screen +Grit Ch. +Eq. tank +Flash mixer +Tube settlers +DM filter +ACF Screen +Grit Ch. +Eq. tank +Flash mixer +Tube settlers +DM filter +ACF Screen +Grit Ch. +Eq. tank +Fl. Mixer +Flocculator +Tube settlers +DMF +ACF Screen +Grit Ch. +Eq. tank +Flash mixer +Tube settlers +DM filter +ACF Screen +Grit Ch. +Eq. tank +Flash mixer +Tube settlers +DM filter +ACF Screen +Grit Ch. +Eq. tank +Fl. Mixer +Flocculator +Tube settlers +DMF +ACF
34 Dye & dye intermediate, chemical 104 Pharmaceuticals, Chemical, Steel, Pesticides, leather 24 Pharmaceuticals, chemical
Tankers
Amberpet STP
Tankers
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Delhi Wazirpur CETP Mangolpuri CETP Mayapuri CETP Lawrence Road CETP Jhilmil CETP Badli CETP Okhla Indl Area CETP GTK Road CETP SMA CETP Nangloi CETP Narela CETP Gujrat Naroda CETP, Ahmedabad Vatva CETP, Ahmedabad Odhav CETP, Ahmedabad Vapi CETP, Vapi, Valsad Nandesari CETP, Vadodara Ankleshwar CETP
24 2.4 12 12 16.8 12 24 6 12 12
Pickling and general General General Food processing and general Engineering and general Pickling General and textile General General Rubber products and general General
Industrial sewers Industrial sewers Industrial sewers Industrial sewers Industrial sewers Industrial sewers Industrial sewers Industrial sewers Industrial sewers Industrial sewers Industrial sewers Pipeline
Yamuna River Yamuna River Yamuna River Yamuna River Yamuna River Yamuna River Yamuna River Yamuna River Yamuna River Yamuna River Yamuna River Sabarmati River Sabarmati River Sabarmati River Damangang a River Estuarine zone of River Mahi Narmada River
16
1.20
55
5.50
0.50
O&G trap +Eq.tank +F.mixer + Clariflocculator +Aeration tank +Secondary clarifier and Sludge drying beds Eq.tank +F.mixer + Clariflocculator +Aeration tank +Aeration tank- integral secondary clarifier and Sludge drying beds Eq. tank +F.mixer +Clariflocculator +Aeratin tank-I +S.Clarifier-I +Aeratin tank-II +S.Clarifier-II and Filter press for sludge Screen +Grit chamber +Eq. tank + Clariflocculator +Aeratin tank + Secondary clarifier and Sludge drying beds Screen +Grit chamber +Eq. tank +F.mixer +Clariflocculator +Aeration tank +Secondary clarifier +Sand and activated carbon filter and Sludge drying beds Eq. tank +Neutralization tank +Clariflocculator +Aeratin tank + Secondary clarifier +Chemical dozing tank +Tube settler +Sand and activated carbon filter and Vacuum drum filter for sludge Eq. tank +Chemical treatment tank +Clariflocculator +Aeratin tank-I + Lamella Clarifier-I + Aeratin tank-II + Lamella Clarifier-II
255 Textile & Chemicals Dyes, Pharmaceuticals, 464 Dyes, Textile Pharma. Chemicals Rolling mills 61 Dye&dye intermediate, Textiles 777 Paper mills, Chemicals, Dyes, Pharma, Engg. 256 Chemical, Organic chemicals, Dyes & dye intermediate 263 Chemical, , Dyes &dye intermediate, Pesticides, Pharma. 38 Dyes & dye intermediate
Pipeline
Pipeline
Pipeline
Tankers
Tankers
Tankers
Creek
S. No. 8
CETP Sarigam CETP, Sargam, Valsad Dhareswar CETP, Jetpur Sanand CETP, Paldi, Ahmedabad Jetpur CETP, Jetpur Panoli CETP, Bharuch Padra CETP, Sachin CETPII, Sachin, Surat GVMSAV Odhav CETP, Ahmedabad Narol CETP, Ahmedabad Haryana Kundli CETP
Technology/ Treatment Scheme Eq. tank +Flash mixer+Clariflocculator +Aeratin tank-I + Secondary Clarifier-I + Aeratin tank-II + Secondary Clarifier-II O&G trap +Flash mixer +Clarifier +Bio tank +Sand filter +AC filter Eq. tank +Filter press +Multiple effect evaporation system +Incineration chamber (for liquid and solid waste) Eq. tank +O&G trap +Chemical mixing +Cl. Flocculator +Aerated lagoon Eq. tank +Flash mixer +Clariflocculator +Aeratin tank +S. clarifier +DM filter ? Eq. tank +Flash mixer +Primary Lamella +Aeratin tank +SST +pH adjustment +Tube settler +Sand filter +ACF Eq.tank +F.mixer +Clariflocculator +Aeration tank +S.clarifier +Pressure sand filter +Activated carbon filter
Type of industries 17 Chemical, Pharma, Dyes&dye intermediate 23 Textile printing units 32 Chemical, Pharma, Dyes, Pesticides, Petroleum 972 Textile printing units 101 Chemical, Pharma, Dyes ? 71 Textile dyeing and printing units 264 Dye & Dye intermediate
9 10
0.15/.055 0.2
River Bhadar
11 12 13 14
15
1.0
16
0.1
1.10
Biological treatment
198 Milk/ food processing, textile, rubber, leather 26 metal finishing inits Tankers
0.3
22
1 2
Lidkar Banglore CETP Maharashtra Dombiveli CETP Phase-I Dombiveli CETP Phase-II
Inlet sumps (3) +Reaction tanks (3) for acidic, alkaline and cyanide waste +Blending chamber +Flocculation tank +Clarifier +Sand filter +pH adjustment and RO Plant +Evaporator for high TDS waste and Filter press primary sludge and evaporator residue G. chamber +Eq. tank +Primary clarifier +Aeration tank (2) +Secondary clarifier (2) and Sludge drying beds Eq.tank +F.mixer +Flocculation tank +Clarifier + Bioreactor + S.clarifier O&G trap +Eq.tank +Clariflocculator +Biotower +Secondary clarifier and Sludge drying beds Eq. cum neutralization tank + F.mixer + Clariflocculator + Aeration tank (Extended Aeration) +Secondary clarifier and Sludge drying beds Eq.tank cum oil separator +Clariflocculator +Aer tank-I +Clarifier-I +Aer.tank-II +Clarifier-II +Aer.tank-III +Clarifier-III and Filter press for sludge O&G trap + Eq. cum neutralization tank + Clariflocculator + Aer.tank + Secondary clarifier and Sludge drying beds Screen +Grit chamber + Eq. cum neutralization tank + Clariflocculator +Aer.tank + Secondary clarifier Eq. cum neutralization tank +PST +Aer.tank + Secondary clarifier and sludge pits Physico chemical +Biological +Tertiary (proposed)
5 Tannery
Pipeline
Public sewers
14 1.5
12
Tarapur CETP
Taloja CETP
10
118 Textile industries 157 Pharmaceut. Organic/ inorganic chemicals, Dyes, Metal coating 480 Pharmaceut. Dye, Pigments Paints, Textile, , Chemicals, (1905 non members) 223 Pharmaceutical, Chemical, Dyes, Engineering 943 Pharma & other industries 34 Dyes and Chemical 19 Textile, Dairy Chemicals, , Auto parts, Batteries 35 Chemical, Pharma, Dyes & Dye intermediate Petrochemical
Tankers
Pipeline
Thane Creek
Tankers
Thane Creek
Pipeline
Thane Creek
0.25
Tankers
MIDC drain
River
15
S. No. 9
Technology/ Treatment Scheme G. chamber +Neutralization +F.mixer +Clariflocculation +Biotower +Aeration tankI&II +S.clarifier +Pressure sand filters Equalization tank +Clarifloculator +Aer.tank I + Secondary clarifier I + Aer.tank II + Secondary clarifier II and Thickener and Filter press for sludge
Effluent collection
Effluent disposal
10
Badlapur CETP
HDPE pipeline
11 1
0.9
Eq. tank +Holding tank +Buffer tank +Anaerobic reactor (UASB) + Aeration tank Anaerobic filter + ASP
34 Industries
Tankers+ Pipeline
0.035
1.50
ASP
28 Tanneries (27 vegetable, 1 chrome) 67 tanning and allied industries (39 chrome) 600 Textile dyeing and printing (CETP was designed for 319 units only) 60 Textile dyeing and printing 100 Stainless steel pickling and 150 Textile dyeing and printing 55 industries + sewage 473 Textile units+ sewage for Unit I&II Open drain
6.00
Screen +G. Chamber +O&G trap +Eq.tank +F.mixer + Clariflocculator + Aeration tank and Sludge drying beds Screen +G. Chamber +O&G trap +Eq.tank +F.mixer + Clariflocculator + Aeration tank +Secondary clarifier and Sludge drying beds Screen +G. Chamber +Eq.tanks (2) +F.mixer + Clariflocculator + Aeration tank +Secondary clarifier +Sand filter + ACF
Luni River
Jasol CETP
2.50
Open drain Drain for textile/ Pipeline for steel units Open drain Open drains Ind+sew Open drains Ind+sew Open drains Ind+sew Pipeline
Luni River
Jodhpur CETP
20.00
Jojri River
Bhiwadi CETP
Pali CETP Unit I Pali CETP Unit II Pali CETP Unit III Machheri CETP, Jaipur
8.40
9.00
0.60
O&G trap + Aeration tanks +Secondary clarifier and Sludge thickener and Filter press for sludge Eq.tank +Chemical mixing + Clariflocculator + Aeration tanks (2) +Secondary clarifier and Sludge drying beds Screen +G. Chamber +Eq.tank +Chemical mixing + Clariflocculator + Aeration tank +Secondary clarifier and Sludge drying beds Screen +G. Chamber +Eq.tank +Chemical mixing + Clariflocculator + Aeration tank +Secondary clarifier and Sludge drying beds Eq.tank +Chemical mixing + P. Clarifier + Bioreactor +Secondary clarifier +Chemical mixing +Tertiary settling and Filter press for sludge Screen +Eq.tanks (2) +Chemical mixing + Clariflocculator + Sand filter +Stabilization Tank and Sludge thickener +Decanter centrifuge +Sludge drying beds for sludge Screen +Eq.tanks (2) +Chemical mixing + Clariflocculator + Sand filter +Stabilization Tank and Sludge thickener +Decanter centrifuge +Sludge drying beds for sludge Screen +Eq.tanks (2) +Chemical mixing + Clariflocculator + Sand filter +Stabilization Tank and Sludge thickener +Decanter centrifuge +Sludge drying beds for sludge Screen +Eq.tanks (2) +Chemical mixing + Clariflocculator + Sand filter +Stabilization Tank and Sludge thickener +Decanter centrifuge +Sludge drying beds for sludge
Sabi River
River Bandi
River Bandi
River Bandi
On land
4.2
30 Textile bleaching and dyeing 20 Textile bleaching and dyeing 75 Textile bleaching and dyeing 10 Textile bleaching and dyeing
HDPE pipeline
HDPE pipeline
Noyyal River (Orathupalay am dam) Noyyal River (Orathupalay am dam) Inland surface water
10
HDPE pipeline
1.6
HDPE pipeline
S. No. 5
Technology/ Treatment Scheme Screen +Eq.tanks (2) +Chemical mixing + Clariflocculator + Sand filter +Stabilization Tank and Sludge thickener +Decanter centrifuge +Sludge drying beds for sludge Screen +Eq.tanks (2) +Chemical mixing + Clariflocculator + Sand filter +Stabilization Tank and Sludge thickener +Decanter centrifuge +Sludge drying beds for sludge Screen +Eq.tanks (2) +Chemical mixing + Clariflocculator + Sand filter +Stabilization Tank and Sludge thickener +Decanter centrifuge +Sludge drying beds for sludge Screen +Eq.tanks (2) +Chemical mixing + Clariflocculator + Sand filter +Stabilization Tank and Sludge thickener +Decanter centrifuge +Sludge drying beds for sludge Physico-chemical treatment --Do--
Type of industries 18 Textile bleaching and dyeing 21 Textile bleaching and dyeing 72 Textile bleaching and dyeing 31 Textile bleaching and dyeing
HDPE pipeline
8.5
HDPE pipeline
Chinnakkarai CETP Ltd., Tirupur Andakovil CETP, Karur KS CETP, Karur KKEL CETP, Karur
HDPE pipeline
Odai Canal
9 10 11
Amaravati River
1.3
12
13
Eq.tank +Chemical mixing + Clariflocculator + Aeration tank (Not used now) +Secondary clarifier and Sludge thickener +Decanter centrifuge +Belt filter for sludge Physico-chemical treatment
Canal
2.1
14
15
16
Valandi Dyeing CETP, Karur Taluk Dye & Bleaching CETP, Karur Amaravathi Poll Tech CETP, karur TALCO Vaniyambadi, Valayampet, CETP, Vellore TALCO Vaniyambadi, Udayendiram CETP, Vellore TALCO Pernambut CETP
Eq.tank +Chemical mixing + Clariflocculator + Aeration tank (Not used now) +Secondary clarifier and Sludge thickener +Decanter centrifuge +Belt filter for sludge Physico-chemical treatment
Canal
--Do--
2.4
17
2.8
Eq.tank +Chemical mixing + Clariflocculator + Aeration tank (Not used now) +Secondary clarifier and Sludge thickener +Decanter centrifuge +Belt filter for sludge Eq. tank + Screen +F. mixer +Primary clarifier +Anaerobic lagoon +Aerated lagoon +Secondary clarifier and Sludge drying beds Settling basin + Screen +G. chamber +Eq. tank +F. mixer +Clariflocculator +Anaerobic lagoon (2) + Aerated lagoon +Secondary clarifier and Sludge drying beds Screen +Eq. tank +F. mixer +Primary clarifier +Anaerobic lagoon +Pre-aeration tank +Aeration tank +Secondary clarifier +Chemical dozing +Tertiaty clarifier and Sludge thickener +Centrifuge / Sludge drying beds Eq. tank +F. mixer +Primary clarifier +Oxidation ditches (4) +Secondary clarifier and Sludge drying beds Screen +Eq. tank +F. mixer +Primary clarifier +Aeration tank (2) +Secondary clarifier +Polishing pond and Sludge thickener +sludge drying beds
Canal
Palar River
18
0.2
10 Tannery
HDPE pipeline
Palar River
19
0.9
10 Tannery
HDPE pipeline
20
34 Tannery
HDPE pipeline
21
3.4
22 Tannery
HDPE pipeline
On land (HRTS system) and Palar River On land (Green belt) and Palar River
S. No. 22
Capacity MLD 4
Technology/ Treatment Scheme Screen +Pre-settler +Eq. tank +F. mixer +Primary clarifier +Anaerobic lagoon +Preaeration tank +Aeration tank +Secondary clarifier +Chemical dozing +Tertiaty clarifier and Sludge thickener +Centrifuge / Sludge drying beds
23
24
Melpudupet CETP, Ambur, Vellore Ambur Mallgalthope CETP, Vellore SIDCO Ranipet CETP, Vellore SIDCO phase II CETP Ranipet, Vellore TALCO Dindigul CETP
1.1
Screen +Eq. tank +F. mixer +Primary clarifier +Anaerobic lagoon +Aeration tank +Secondary clarifier and Sludge drying beds Screen +Eq. tank +F. mixer +Primary clarifier +Aeration tank (2) +Secondary clarifier +Filter bed and Sludge drying beds
7 Tannery
HDPE pipeline
25
2.5
86 Tannery
HDPE pipeline
On land (HRTS system) and Palar River On land (Irrigation) and Ponnai Lake
26
27
2.5
Eq. tank +Screen + Primary clarifier +Anaerobic lagoon + Aeration tank +Secondary clarifier and Sludge drying beds
45 Tannery
HDPE pipeline
28
29
TALCO Madhavaram CETP, Chennai Pallavaram CETP, Chennai UP Kanpur CETP Unnao CETP Mathura CETP West Bengal Calcutta Leather Complex CETP
0.4
G. chamber +Eq. tank +Primary clarifier +Aeration tank (2) +Secondary clarifier (2) and Sludge drying beds Screen +G. chamber +Eq. tank +Clariflocculator +Aeration tank +Secondary clarifier and Sludge thickener +Filter press +Sludge drying beds USAB + ASP ASP (Two stage) ASP
14 Tannery
Pipeline
125 Tannery
Pipeline
Adyar River
1 2 3
354 Tanneries +Sewage (1:1.5) 21 Tanneries 30 Textile dyeing and printing About 540-550 tanneries processing 1000 MT hides to be shifted to Calcutta Leather Complex
Eq. tank with preaeration +Primary clarifier +Aeration tank +Secondary clarifier and Chrome Recovery Unit
Table 3 Performance of CETPs in terms of aggregate water quality parameters and salinity, values in mg/l except pH
S.N. AP 1 CETP Jeedimetla CETP Date of monitoring Dec 30, 04 (Comp.) Cap MLD 5 Flow, MLD 1.2 1.2 1.6 1.2+ 1.6 sew 1.2+ 1.6 sew ---do--Dec 02EPTRI 5 1.2 1.2 1.6 1.2+ 1.6 sew 1.2+ 1.6 sew 2 Pattancheru CETP Dec 31, 04 (Comp.) 7.5 2 2 1 2+ 1 sew 2+ 1 sew ---do--Dec 02EPTRI 7.5 2 2 1 2+ 1 sew 2+ 1 sew Delhi 1 Wazirpur CETP Aug 28, 05 For 7 hr 24 (2*12) 1*500 3 m /hr Sampling location Influent (Ind.) Outlet Clarifier & DAF (Ind.) Sewage Inlet ASP (Mixed) Effluent (Mixed) pH 8.35 8.48 7.58 8.16 7.31 BOD 4000 3000 130 2600 18 COD 9260 7686 278 7130 1019 TSS 586 316 296 213 121 TDS 37302 39312 1535 37772 14990 Na 1230 0 1212 0 234 1194 0 5040 Cl 9401 9040 376 8678 5062
Influent (Ind.) Outlet Clarifier & DAF (Ind.) Sewage Inlet ASP (Mixed) Effluent (Mixed)
ND ND ND ND ND
Influent (Ind.) Outlet DAF (Ind.) Sewage from BHEL township Inlet ASP (Mixed) Inlet ASP (Mixed)
Influent (Ind.) Outlet DAF (Ind.) Sewage from BHEL township Inlet ASP (Mixed) Effluent (Mixed)
ND ND ND ND ND
Influent After equal. tank After tube settler After DMF Effluent after ACF
4.08 3.37 6.17 6.91 7.45 7.36 7.41 7.55 7.56 7.43 6.91 7.26 7.20 7.20
65 34 36 25 21 59 54 10 4 3 128 40 34 22
3826 4098 4262 3816 3816 7268 7050 7034 1764 2144 2254 2200 1246 613 1358
Mangolpuri CETP
2.4
50 3 m /hr
Influent (after eq.) After PST After SST After DMF Effluent
Mayapuri CETP
12
500 3 m /hr
566
S.N. 4
Cap MLD 12
Sampling location Influent (after eq.) After tube settler After dual media filter Effluent
pH 7.57 7.43 7.63 7.89 7.47 7.54 7.54 7.53 7.56 5.22 6.41 6.75 6.80 7.23 7.89 8.29 7.92 7.81 8.09 7.05 6.54 6.56 6.57 7.38 7.40 7.49 7.62 7.76 7.71 7.86 7.93 7.3 7.8 7.67.8 7.55 - 7.9 8.08.7 8.2 6.1
BOD 304 100 145 114 103 30 04 08 06 52 20 05 05 07 311 138 64 36 29 296 20 11 10 6 3 6 3 50 42 5 4 1540 375 12301600 11401350 160
COD 615 276 233 185 211 88 18 16 26 197 130 57 13 39 657 620 113 82 67 1581 49 39 37 30 19 39 24 210 283 26 16 5299 2988 53705980 53905980 16501970 3604 860
TSS 366 80 152 108 369 163 64 48 43 862 873 30 30 28 146 0 172 0 84 36 44
Na
Cl 538
1528 3666 3692 4110 3930 3086 1946 1726 1944 1682 1672 3202 2782 3092 2270 2148 1482
407
Jhilmil CETP
16.8 (2*8.4)
1*350 3 m /hr
Influent After equal. tank After tube settler After DMF Effluent after ACF
Badli CETP
12
500 3 m /hr
Influent After equal. tank After tube settler After DMF Effluent after ACF
24 (2*12)
1*500 3 m /hr
Influent After equal. tank After tube settler After DMF Effluent after ACF
250 3 m /hr
Influent (after eq.) After tube settler After dual media filter Effluent
270
1796 1740 1550 4134 4190 4062 4228 4240 3910 3950 981 ND ND 28900 29000 14600 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 736 1368 238 556
SMA CETP
Jul 1, 05 For 7 hr
12 (2*6)
1*250 3 m /hr
Influent (after eq.) After tube settler After dual media filter Effluent
10
Nangloi CETP
Jul 6, 05 For 7 hr
12
500 3 m /hr
Influent (after eq.) After tube settler After dual media filter Effluent
2004-05
Influent Effluent
--do--
Dec 02-IITB
2004-05
16
10
Influent Effluent
700 71
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
S.N.
Cap MLD 16
Flow, MLD
pH ND ND 7.87.95 8.79.0 7.98.1 7.0 7.0 7.38.4 7.18.3 7.28.4 7.2 7.2 ND ND 6.17.9 7.38.1 7.17.9 7.8 7.8 ND ND 7.08.5 8.2 7.3 7.08.5 1.2
COD 2560 1872 21403000 25803540 9401710 1147 550 11502240 13202360 8101120 2654 976 5325 1563 14503900 10003000 6103300 1124 295 2835 649 20002500 230 305 180230 5277
TSS 276 320 400600 ND 90100 362 52 400650 ND 85100 974 81 710 204 400650 ND 80120 145 33 306 45 250500 ND ND 6090 930
TDS 18422 21224 10000250000 1260025200 1920023900 ND ND 2430024500 2315023300 2020020800 ND ND 19825 9168 870010650 990011250 1050014000 15433 8743 22862 34566 21600 8700 10800 35009500 38906
Na ND ND ND ND ND
Cl ND ND ND ND ND
--do--
Dec 02-IITB
16
10
2004-05
1.2
0.7
Influent Effluent
142 35 590800 560800 140160 769 221 2500 360 4801120 180480 120250 139 27 1300 93 12001900 70 60 30- 60
ND ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND ND
--do--
Dec 02-IITB
1.2
0.6
Vapi CETP
Jan 3, 05 (Grab)
55
45
Influent Effluent
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
--do--
Dec 02
55
--do--
Dec 02-IITB
55
Nandesari CETP
5.5
1.5
Influent Effluent
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
--do--
Jan 2004
5.5
--do--
Dec 02-IITB
5.5
Ankleshwar CETP
Influent
1600
ND
1081 1 1418 ND ND ND ND ND ND
Effluent --do-April 2005 1 Influent Effluent 0.8/1.8 Influent After P. Clarifier After S. Clarifier Effluent
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
--do--
Dec 02-IITB
S.N. 7
pH 7.3
BOD 242
COD 1020
TSS 129
TDS 8355
Na ND
Cl 5261
Effluent --do-Dec 02-IITB 0.5 0.15 Influent After P. Clarifier Effluent Influent Effluent --do-Dec 02-IITB 0.4 .105 Influent After P. Clarifier Effluent
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Sarigam CETP
Jan 4, 05 (Grab)
0.4
.075
0.15/0. 055
0.05
Influent Effluent
ND ND ND ND ND
754 472 ND ND ND
--do--
Dec 02-IITB
0.15/0. 055
0.06
10
Dec 02-IITB
0.2
.003
Influent
5.88
15270
19800
ND
ND
After P. Clarifier Effluent 11 Jetpur CETP Jan 19, 05 (Grab) 20 7 Influent Effluent --do-Dec 02-IITB 20 6 Influent After P. Clarifier (Effluent) Effluent 12 Panoli CETP, Bharuch Sep 23-24, 04 ( 24 hr) I 0.45 Influent Effluent 13 Padra CETP, 2004-05 2.25 Influent Effluent 20 Influent
ND ND ND ND ND ND
ND ND 471 990 ND ND
ND ND ND ND ND
2045 6 7868 ND ND ND
14
50
7.9 6.9
92 283
340 1028
59 335
14102
ND ND
ND
Effluent Haryana 1 Kundli CETP 2004 1.1 0.7 Influent After P. Clarifier Effluent
S.N.
CETP
Sampling location Influent (Alkaline) Influent (Acidic) Influent (Cyanide) After Clariflocculator Effluent RO feed RO permeate
BOD 29 47 42 57 37 50 26 143
Na ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Oct 3, 02 CLRI
0.15
Influent
Effluent Maharashtra 1 Dombiveli CETP Phase I Feb 17, 05 (Grab) 14 12 Influent Effluent --do-March 2004 14 Influent Effluent 1.5 Influent
ND ND ND ND ND ND
1.5
9.4
Effluent --do-March 2004 1.5 Influent Effluent 0.3 Influent After P. Clarifier Effluent
7.4 ND ND 7.37.6 6.77.1 6.76.9 7.1 7.4 ND ND 6.68.2 6.76.9 6.77.5 8.13
559 1082 273 12701580 11801460 340495 1733 243 1818 419 600840 470780 70- 300
ND ND ND ND ND ND
--do--
Dec 02-IITB
1.5
12
12
Influent Effluent
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
1000 1070 ND ND ND ND ND
--do--
Jan 2004
12
12
--do--
Dec 02-IITB
12
12
Tarapur CETP
1.2
Influent
6512
12517
ND
ND
ND ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND ND
--do--
2004-05
S.N.
Cap MLD 2
TSS 8001300 ND 1001000 941 190 686 118 172 78 490620 115285 110360 100250 50220 7090 600 1500 2407 25 42 560 620 1352 108 1676 3319 36 638 268 224
TDS 26000 ND ND
Na ND ND ND
Cl ND ND ND
Taloja CETP
Feb 16, 05
10
10.5 6.7
6.5
2174 806 1383 727 417 201 450540 285440 110200 340770 250300 110120 800 220 3283 125 482 4980 1897 1423 134 450 5624 81 856 515 222
4784 6416 4366 5558 ND ND 17302740 20002380 18752240 26503470 24005700 30606180 3560 3760 2684 2760 921 12955 10140 ND ND ND ND ND 27374 27596 27774
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2099 2699 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
--do---do--
10 10
ND 7.1 7.1 6.67.4 6.67.2 6.77.0 7.07.3 11.2 11.4 7.48.0 7.1 7.6 7.5 7.6
--do--
Dec 02-IITB
10
9.5
Ambernath CETP
Dec 02-IITB
0.25
0.1
ND ND ND
ND ND ND
Jaisingpur CETP
Dec 02-IITB
0.8
Influent Effluent
15
10
15
9 MP 1
Mahad CETP
March 2004
7.5
0.9
0.492
Jan 04
0.035
51%
5.784
Jasol CETP
Dec 18, 04
2.50
17962 ND ND ND ND
Jodhpur CETP
20
12
S.N. 4
Cap MLD 6
pH 6.6 7.16 8.4 7.8 7.99 8.11 8.32 7.65 9.18 8.27 8.8 7.3 7.2 8.36 7.18 7.4 7.13 8.26 8.01 7.96 9.14 9.07 8.7 7.9 6.8 6.9 8.88
BOD 567 254 625 150 808 66 871 182 882 738 51 488 109 874 58 583 131 684 640 49 145 130 120 133 63 33 210
COD 1135 731 2140 580 2218 408 2240 620 1836 1566 488 1600 400 1469 391 1920 440 1751 1144 340 360 216 216 435 297 198 450
TSS 166 122 1736 190 1869 219 1373 124 1194 503 241 199 114 369 206 298 156 1001 158 226 310 116 61 320 <5 10 180
TDS ND ND 9496 8846 9040 8272 14208 10380 ND ND ND 5910 5590 6060 8552 5942 5552 ND ND ND 7046 7066 7060 8190 7380 7535 8380
Na 1154 787 2890 2730 1380 1520 3280 3020 ND ND ND 2015 1920 1260 1200 2195 1860 ND ND ND 2720
Cl 755 545 2830 2610 273 279 2620 2430 ND ND ND 1930 1626 113 136 1850 1530 ND ND ND 3581 3774 3774 4037 3940 3940 4162
8.4
4060%
Influent Effluent
--do--
8.40
Influent Effluent
--do--
8.40
Influent Effluent
--do--
Jul, 02 (Grab)
8.40
9.00
4060%
Influent Effluent
--do--
9.00
Influent Effluent
--do--
9.00
Influent Effluent
--do--
Jul, 02 (Grab)
9.00
4.2
3.5
-do-
Dec 02EPTRI
4.2
3.5
2800 ND ND ND 3360
Influent
-do-
Dec 02EPTRI
37 35 320 15 20 160 29 23 30
3000 ND ND ND 3880
10
9.6
3560 3560
3644 3871
S.N.
Cap MLD 10
Na ND ND ND 3640
1.6
1.4
Influent
Effluent -doDec 02EPTRI 1.6 1.4 Influent After P. Clarifier Effluent 5 Kunnankalpal ayam CETP, Tirupur Sep 16, 04 (Comp.) I shift 4.25 3.6 Influent
42 109 61 37 125
41 40 20 10 122
3320 ND ND ND 3000
After P. Clarifier After S. Filter Effluent (after stabilization) -doSep 16, 04 (Comp.) II shift 4.25 3.6 Influent
115 100 56
127 155 33
ND
8.83
115
343
127
8200
ND
4162
After P. Clarifier After S. Filter Effluent (after stabilization) -doDec 02EPTRI 4.25 3.6 Influent After P. Clarifier Effluent 6 Andipalayam CETP, Tirupur Sep 16, 04 (Comp.) I shift 5 3.5 Influent
100 110 65
33 62 61
2740
85 60 28 115
180 5 15 161
ND ND ND 4400
100 90 140
29 20 312
ND ND
After P. Clarifier Effluent -doDec 02EPTRI 5 3.5 Influent After P. Clarifier Effluent 7 Angeripalaya m CETP, Tirupur Sep 16, 04 (Comp. I shift 8.5 7.2 Influent
95 100 93 61 27 190
28 20 260 10 15 100
4000 ND ND ND ND
37 32 73
ND ND
9.06 8.89
190 150
364 338
39 97
6898 6850
ND
3871 3581
S.N.
pH 8.1
BOD 109
COD 396
TSS 100
TDS 8310
Na ND
Cl 3940
After P. Clarifier Effluent 8 Chinnakkarai CETP Ltd., Tirupur Sep 16, 04 (Comp.) I shift 5 4 Influent
66 44 125
14 <5 159
ND ND ND
89 53 122
ND ND
After P. Clarifier Effluent -doDec 02EPTRI 5 4 Influent After P. Clarifier Effluent 9 Andakovil CETP, Karur Sep 18, 04 (Grab) Influent After P. Clarifier Effluent 10 KS CETP, Karur Sep 18, 04 (Grab) Influent After P. Clarifier Effluent 11 KKEL CETP, Karur Sep 18, 04 (Grab) 1.3 1.1 Influent After P. Clarifier Effluent -doDec 02EPTRI 1.3 1.1 Influent After P. Clarifier Effluent 12 Sellandi Palayam CETP, Karur Sep 18, 04 (Grab) Influent
8.04 7.91 8.0 7.7 7.6 9.5 10.6 10.0 7.6 8.8 9.0 8.9 11.2 11 7.9 7.0 7.2 9.1
205 247 317 257 178 175 ND 140 88 ND 26 307 ND 132 356 257 158 263
59 57 100 15 10 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 190 10 10 ND
9682 9378 6510 6240 6060 5654 5248 3086 6338 5376 6112 5032 4352 4423 5130 4940 5090 4380
ND ND ND ND 1992 2000 1200 1920 1760 2080 2000 1490 1780 ND ND ND 1740
4936 4936 3268 3172 3172 2581 2396 1438 2949 2360 2839 2489 1899 1972 2692 2595 2500 2028
After P. Clarifier Effluent 13 Thiruvai CETP, Karur Sep 18, 04 (Grab) 2.1 1.5 Influent After P. Clarifier Effluent -doDec 02EPTRI 2.1 1.5 Influent After P. Clarifier Effluent 14 Valandi Dyeing CETP, Karur Sep 18, 04 (Grab) Influent
ND 60 43 ND 24 94 60 42 120
ND ND ND ND ND 215 <5 10 ND
11.1 9.8
ND 90
ND 211
ND ND
5184 5160
1920 2120
2350 2581
S.N. 15
Cap MLD
Flow, MLD
pH 8.6
BOD 405
COD 746
TSS ND
TDS 12162
Na 5000
Cl 5899
After P. Clarifier Effluent 16 Amaravathi Poll Tech CETP, karur Sep 18, 04 (Grab) 2.4 2 Influent
ND 218 123
ND 386 175
ND ND ND
After P. Clarifier Effluent -doDec 02EPTRI 2.4 2 Influent After P. Clarifier Effluent 17 TALCO Vaniyambadi Valayampet, CETP, Vellore Nov 3, 04 (Comp.) 2.8 Influent
ND 125 84 54 22 1470
After P. clarifier Effluent ---do--Dec 03, 02 CLRI 2.8 2.4 Influent After P. clarifier After Anaerobic lagoon Effluent (after ASP) ---do--Jul 23, 02 CLRI 2.8 2.4 Influent After P. clarifier After Anaerobic lagoon Effluent (after ASP) 18 TALCO Vaniyambadi, Udayendiram CETP, Vellore Nov 3, 04 (Comp.) 0.2 Influent
8.7 8.5 8.24 7.88 7.84 7.82 8.02 7.9 8.01 8.07 9.5
3018 868 4627 3792 1530 489 3040 2189 1557 515 3396
610 124 3798 2680 1434 114 1884 1117 634 765 672
7113 6618 6679 7252 4824 5093 5841 5594 4187 4820 3196
After P. clarifier Effluent ---do--Dec 3, 02 CLRI 0.2 0.18 Influent After P. clarifier Effluent Influent After P. clarifier Effluent 19 TALCO Pernambut CETP Nov 4, 04 (Comp.) 0.9 Influent
---do---
Nov 7, 02 CLRI
0.2
0.18
---do---
0.9
0.48
3360 5320 ND ND ND
S.N.
pH 8.88
BOD 872
COD 2243
TSS 1539
TDS 5765
Na ND
Cl 3027
After P. clarifier Effluent 20 TALCO Ambur Thuthipet CETP, Vellore Nov 4, 04 (Comp.) 2 Influent
708 45 540
ND ND 3200
After P. clarifier Effluent ---do--July 30, 02 CLRI 2 1 Influent After P. clarifier Effluent ---do--2002 CLRI 2 1 Influent After P. clarifier Effluent Influent
21
Nov 5, 04 (Comp.)
3.4
---do---
3.4
0.8
After P. Clarifier After ASP clarifier Effluent (after PP) Influent After P. Clarifier After ASP clarifier Effluent (after polishing pond Influent After P. Clarifier After ASP clarifier Effluent (after PP)
8.0 7.0 7.0 7.26 7.33 7.76 7.25 7.55 7.51 7.82 7.77 7.43
1845 194 233 3600 2800 450 380 5681 2815 651 626 5470.4
160 58 14 2100 1158 132 100 2626 1200 360 380 750
11554 8846 7393 12010 11904 11030 10906 11008 12395 8405 9292 7940
5400 4050 3857 5195 5112 5211 5154 5372 6104 4137 4490 3568
---do---
Jul 2, 02 CLRI
3.4
0.8
22
Nov 5, 04 (Comp.)
Influent
---do---
2.2
After P. Clarifier Effluent Influent After Pre-settler After P. Clarifier After Anaerobic lagoon After ASP Clarifier Effluent (After tert.. clarifier Influent After Pre-settler After P. Clarifier After Anaerobic lagoon After ASP Clarifier Effluent (After ter. clarifier
7.78 7.78 7.73 7.43 7.22 7.39 7.63 7.76 8.06 8.3 7.94 7.77 7.75 8.24
ND 631.2 3549 2362 1436 1306 427 285 2635 2065 2221 1891 836 414
105 48 1900 1332 1098 1002 568 80 2044 1476 1482 624 1246 664
10055 9878 10152 10400 9332 9274 10132 10292 14320 12518 14342 13260 14076 13576
2000 1840 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
4146 4532 4565 4505 4800 4701 4785 4753 5726 5297 6583 6457 6608 6474
---do---
May 7, 02 CLRI
2.2
S.N. 23
Cap MLD
Flow, MLD
pH 6.72
BOD 1660
COD 4628.8
TSS 575
TDS 5030
Na 1000
7.47 7.92
ND 197.4
ND 841.6
142 65
3876 3548
1280 3120
24
Nov 6, 04 (Comp.)
1.1
Influent
9.0
960
2075
807
7420
3120
After P. Clarifier After Anaerobic lagoon Effluent (after ASP) ---do--Nov 13, 02 CLRI 1.1 0.4 Influent After P. Clarifier After Anaerobic lagoon Effluent (after ASP) ---do--2002 CLRI 1.1 0.4 Influent Effluent Influent
9.1 9.0 7.0 6.93 7.86 8.01 8.28 7.83 8.65 6.72
1698 943 490 2615 1946 1331 890 2230 473 2524.8
6336 7078 8352 7156 7454 6701 6174 5430 4993 5030
945 4547 3061 2094 2522 2674 2598 ND ND 1687 4 7521 8196 9642 908 830 760 1029 1140 969 964
25
Nov 6, 04 (Comp.)
2.5
After P. Clarifier Effluent (after ASP) Effluent (after filter) ---do--Sep 24, 02 CLRI 2.5 1.5 Influent After P. Clarifier Effluent ---do--Jun 6, 02 CLRI 2.5 1.5 Influent After P. Clarifier Effluent 26 SIDCO phase II CETP Ranipet, Vellore Nov 6, 04 (Comp.) Influent
7.47 7.92 7.45 5.3 7.72 7.47 4.01 7.68 7.77 5.88
3876 3548 4558 5904 4796 3948 6378 5844 4168 5320
After P. Clarifier Effluent 27 TALCO Dindigul CETP Dec 11, 02 CLRI 2.5 1.2 Influent
ND 274 1810
ND 946.8 4763
125 32 1608
880 760 ND
---do---
2.5
1.2
After Pre-settler After P. Clarifier After Anaerobic lagoon Effluent Influent After Pre-settler After P. Clarifier After Anaerobic lagoon Effluent
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
S.N. 28
pH 5.2
BOD 648
COD 2647
TSS 986
TDS 6120
Na ND
Cl 936
After P. Clarifier Effluent ---do--Mar 21, 02 CLRI 0.4 0.25 Influent After P. Clarifier Effluent 29 Pallavaram CETP, Chennai Apr 17, 02 CLRI 3 3 Influent
ND ND ND ND ND ND
After P. Clarifier Effluent ---do--UP 1 2002 CLRI 3 3 Influent Effluent Influent Effluent Influent Effluent May 17, 05 36 13.3 Influent Effluent Influent-Tannery Influent-Sewage Mixed ( 1: 1.5) Outlet of Reactor-I Outlet of Reactor-II Final treated Effluent 2 Unnao CETP 2.15 80 Influent After P.Clarifier After Sec. clarifier-I Effluent (after Sec. clarifier-II) Influent Effluent 3 Mathura CETP 6.25 60 Influent After P. Clarifier Effluent Standard for Irrigation Standard for Discharge in surface waters
ND ND ND ND
1468 948 ND ND
Kanpur CETP
April 04
36
10
December 04
36
10
36
28
ND ND ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND
--do--
Dec, 2004
1493 30 7.6 7.5 7.5 5.5 9.0 5.5 9.0 118 75 67 100 30
3293 120 195 172 238 200 100 ND ND ND 2100 2100 ND ND ND --ND ND ND 1000 600
Table 4 Metals and special parameters in effluent from CETPs, values in mg/l except pH
S.N. 1 CETP AP Jeedimetla CETP Date of monitoring Dec 30, 04 (Comp.) Sampling location Influent Effluent 2 Pattancheru CETP Dec 31, 04 (Comp.) Influent Effluent 1 Delhi Wazirpur CETP Oct 9-10, 04 For 24 hr Influent Effluent 2 Mangolpuri CETP Jun 28, 05 For 7 hr Influent Effluent 3 Mayapuri CETP Jun 29, 05 For 7 hr Influent Effluent 4 Lawrence CETP Road Jun 30,05 For 7 hr Influent Effluent 5 Jhilmil CETP Aug 5-6, 04 For 24 hr Influent Effluent 6 Badli CETP Influent Effluent Area Jul 2, 05 For 7 hr Influent Effluent BDL BDL 0.03 BDL 0.03 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 0.56 0.08 75.7 65.9 265 253 Cd ND ND ND ND BDL BDL 0.03 BDL 0.05 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL Cr ND ND ND ND 41 BDL 1.00 BDL 0.68 BDL 0.40 BDL 1.25 BDL Cu ND ND ND ND 14.5 BDL 3.22 BDL 1.20 BDL 0.09 BDL 2.5 BDL Ni ND ND ND ND 4.3 0.43 0.95 0.22 0.31 BDL 0.87 0.10 0.97 0.06 Pb ND ND ND ND BDL BDL 1.29 BDL 0.18 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL Zn ND ND ND ND 0.97 0.27 2.51 0.08 2.16 BDL 0.72 BDL 1.64 0.03 %Na ND ND ND ND ND ND 56.9 54.4 57.6 54.9 58.8 63.7 ND ND SO4 10310 4583 1358 844 ND ND 1354 1136 119 272 355 464 ND ND NH3-N 771 13.5 3736 894
Okhla CETP
Indl
Influent Effluent
SMA CETP
Jul 1, 05 For 7 hr
Influent Effluent
10
Nangloi CETP
Jul 6, 05 For 7 hr
Influent Effluent
2004-05
Influent Effluent
2004-05
Influent Effluent
ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND
140 98 70 84
--do--
Feb 2004
Influent Effluent
S.N. 3
Cd ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Cr ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Cu ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Ni ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Pb ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Zn ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
%Na ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
SO4 ND ND 3077 3269 5795 1744 ND ND 22025 308 ND ND 1577 622 872 979
NH3-N 123 54 238 246 ND ND 1137 67 734 56 552 56 40 3.8 319 120
Vapi CETP
Jan 3, 05 (Grab)
Influent Effluent
Nandesari CETP
Influent Effluent
--do--
Jan 2004
Ankleshwar CETP
--do--
Sarigam CETP
Jan 4, 05 (Grab)
Influent Effluent
Dhareswar Jetpur
CETP,
Influent Effluent
177 447 174 757 ND ND ND ND 117 553 ND ND ND ND 53.2 1014 381 675
10
Jetpur CETP
Influent Effluent
11
Influent Effluent
12
Padra CETP,
13
14
GVMSAV Odhav CETP, Ahmedabad Haryana Kundli CETP Karnataka Pai & Pai CETP
2004-05
Influent Effluent
Influent Effluent Dec 02-EPTRI Influent (Alkaline) Influent (Acidic) Influent (Cyanide) Effluent
S.N.
Cd BDL BDL
Cr .305 BDL
Cu .218 BDL
Ni 6.07 .032
Pb .065 .062
Zn 1 .039
Lidkar CETP
Banglore
Oct 3, 02 CLRI
0.05 .005
34 14
BDL BDL
0.38 BDL
0.44 0.39
0.4 0.23
75 72
397 700
ND ND
CETP
05
Influent Effluent
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
885 1423 513 715 399 613 11025 1173 ND ND 1269 2122 ND 2122 776 808
Dombiveli Phase II
CETP
05
Influent Effluent
05
Influent Effluent
Tarapur CETP
Influent Effluent
--do--
2004-05
Taloja CETP
--do--
2004-05
Patalganga CETP
February 2005
--do--
March 2004
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
ND
28 308 336
March 2004
CETP,
ND ND 1338 1529 1661 19312 3824 1619 1242 2776 2506 0.08 0.14 ND ND ND ND ND ND
Influent Effluent
Jodhpur CETP
Influent Effluent
Bhiwadi CETP
Jan 12, 05
Pali CETP-II
S.N.
Cd ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Cr ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Zn ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.33 BDL ND ND 0.08 0.02 1 ND ND 0.07 4 BDL ND ND 0.09 1 0.04 4 ND ND ND ND 0.08 3 BDL
%Na ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
SO4 2490 2792 2627 2421 1814 955 2348 2342 1945 1033 227 400 581 564 304 404 460 300
--do--
Influent Effluent
Pali CETP-III
Influent Effluent
--do--
Influent Effluent
--do--
Influent Effluent
CETP,
Influent Effluent
-do-
Dec 02-EPTRI
BDL 3.1
Kasipalayam Tirupur
CETP,
-do-
Dec 02-EPTRI
Influent Effluent
3.5 1.8
Veerapondi Tirupur
CETP,
Influent Effluent
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
696 862 686 728 811 792 977 906 5.6 2.8 4.8 1.1
-do-
Dec 02-EPTRI
Influent Effluent
Influent Effluent
-do-
Dec 02-EPTRI
Influent Effluent
Influent Effluent
ND ND ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND BDL BDL
ND ND ND ND BDL BDL
ND ND ND ND BDL BDL
ND ND ND ND ND ND
-do- II shift
Influent Effluent
-do-
Dec 02-EPTRI
Influent Effluent
S.N. 6
Cd ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Cr ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Cu ND ND ND ND BDL BDL ND ND ND ND 0.10 5 BDL 0.13 7 BDL ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.20 6 BDL ND ND ND ND 0.18 5 0.08 1 ND ND ND
Ni ND ND ND ND BDL BDL ND ND ND ND BDL BDL BDL BDL ND ND ND ND ND ND BDL BDL ND ND ND ND BDL BDL
Pb ND ND ND ND BDL BDL ND ND ND ND BDL BDL BDL BDL ND ND ND ND ND ND BDL BDL ND ND ND ND BDL BDL
Zn ND ND ND ND 0.09 1 BDL ND ND ND ND 0.1 BDL 0.13 BDL ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.10 2 BDL ND ND ND ND 0.14 7 0.04
%Na ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
SO4 988 637 980 925 522 634 606 333 323 446 535 660 390 468 113 94 127 212 588 221 323 530 116 150 173 232 267 374
NH3-N
-do- II shift
Influent Effluent
-do-
Dec 02-EPTRI
Influent Effluent
BDL BDL
Influent Effluent
-do- II shift
Influent Effluent
-do-
Dec 02-EPTRI
Influent Effluent
CETP
Dec 02-EPTRI
Influent Effluent
Andakovil Karur
CETP,
Influent Effluent
10
KS CETP, Karur
Influent Effluent
11
Influent Effluent
-do-
Dec 02-EPTRI
Influent Effluent
BDL 3.1
12
Influent Effluent
13
-do-
BDL BDL
14
Dyeing
Influent Effluent
ND ND ND
ND ND ND
ND ND ND
ND ND ND
ND ND ND
ND ND ND
15
Influent
Effluent
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
338
S.N. 16
Cd ND ND ND ND
Cr ND ND ND ND
Cu ND ND 0.15 7 BDL
Ni ND ND BDL BDL
Pb ND ND BDL BDL
Zn ND ND 0.12 1 0.05 5 ND
%Na ND ND ND ND
NH3-N
BDL BDL
17
Nov 3, 04 (Composite)
Influent
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2291
02
ND .033 .027
ND 155 2
ND BDL BDL
ND 0.05 0.1
ND 0.5 0.2
ND 85 83
243 68
-do-
02
Influent Effluent
.048 .046
67 2
3.1 1.8
BDL BDL
0.48 1.6
85 82
1206 1109
184 174
18
Nov 3, 04 (Composite)
Influent
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
782
Effluent -doDec 3, CLRI 02 Influent Effluent -doNov 7, CLRI 02 Influent Effluent 19 TALCO CETP Pernambut Nov 4, 04 (Composite) Influent Effluent -doDec 19, CLRI 02 Influent Effluent -doJuly 9, CLRI 02 Influent Effluent
ND 83 81 83 80 ND ND 86 82 85 83
2312 576 838 1429 1235 1441 1686 1210 1375 367 855 205 100 228 228 146 49 139 40
20
Ambur CETP,
Nov 4, 04 (Composite)
Influent
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1681
Effluent -doJuly 30, CLRI 02 Influent Effluent 21 Visharam CETP, Melvisharam Vellore Nov 5, 04 (Composite) Influent Effluent -doNov 11, CLRI 02 Influent Effluent
ND 47 1.4 ND ND 13 BDL
ND 80 75 ND ND 88 77
1625 1273 1400 1576 1482 434 1111 162 54 218 208
S.N.
%Na 80 75 ND ND 77 75
22
Nov 5, 04 (Composite)
Influent Effluent
-do-
02
Influent Effluent
175 27
-do-
May 7, CLRI
02
Influent Effluent
.049 .047
18.9 0.17
0.02 5 0.7
0.65 0.63
0.02 2.86
78 75
1329 1135
225 26
23
Nov 5, 04 (Composite)
Influent Effluent
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
1813 2019
24
Nov 6, 04 (Composite)
Influent Effluent
ND ND 83 80 ND ND 74 73
-do-
02
Influent Effluent
25
Nov 6, 04 (Composite)
Influent Effluent
-do-
02
Influent Effluent
-do-
Jun 6, CLRI
02
Influent Effluent
ND ND ND
133 4 ND
5.85 0.68 ND
0.55 0.58 ND
6.0 2.22 ND
75 72 ND
64 64
26
phase II Ranipet,
Nov 6, 04 (Composite)
Influent
Effluent 27 TALCO CETP Dindigul Dec 11, 02 CLRI Influent Effluent -doMar 27, 02 CLRI Influent Effluent
ND 3.1 0.11 ND ND
ND 0.6 0.13 ND ND
ND 0.7 BDL ND ND
ND 87 82 88 83
28
77 74 75 72
69 58 66 88
S.N. 29
Cd .053 .03
Cr 64 2.5
Cu 5.6 BDL
Ni 0.08 BDL
Pb 0.47 0.29
Zn 0.85 0.80
%Na 78 74
NH3-N 100 98
UP Kanpur CETP
ND ND ND ND ND ND NS 5.0
ND ND ND ND ND ND 60 NS
Unnao CETP
Mathura CETP
Standard for Irrigation Standard for Discharge in surface waters BDL- below detection limit ; ND- not determined
50
Bollaram CETP Delhi Wazirpur CETP Mangolpuri CETP Mayapuri CETP Lawrence Road CETP Jhilmil CETP Badli CETP Okhla Indl Area CETP GTK Road CETP SMA CETP Nangloi CETP Narela CETP Gujrat Naroda CETP, Ahmedabad Vatva CETP, Ahmedabad Odhav CETP, Ahmedabad Vapi CETP, Vapi, Valsad Nandesari CETP, Vadodara Ankleshwar CETP
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Pickling and general General General Food processing and general Engineering and general Pickling General and textile General General Rubber products and general General
1 2
3 4
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Sachin CETP-I, Sachin, Surat Sarigam CETP, Sargam, Valsad Dhareswar CETP, Jetpur Sanand CETP, Paldi, Ahmedabad Jetpur CETP, Jetpur Panoli CETP, Bharuch Padra CETP, Sachin CETP-II, Sachin, Surat GVMSAV Odhav CETP, Ahmedabad
229 Dye & dye intermediate, Pharma. Textile & Chemicals 437 Pharmaceuticals, Dye & intermediate, Textile,Chemicals Rolling mills 57 Dye&dye intermediate, Textiles 777 Paper mills, Chemicals, Pharma, Dye & Dye intermediates, Plastic Engg. 166 Chemical, Organic chemicals, Dyes & intermediate 263 Dyes & intermediate, Pesticides, Chemical, Pharma. 38 Dyes & dye intermediate 17 Chemical, Pharma, Dyes&dye intermediate 23 Textile printing units Chemicals, Pharma. Dyes, Pesticides, petrochemical 972 Textile printing units 101 Chemical, Pharma, Dyes&dye intermediate 71 Textile dyeing and printing units 264 Dye & Dye intermediate
S. No. 16
CETP Narol CETP, Ahmedabad Haryana Kundli CETP Karnataka Pai & Pai CETP Lidkar Banglore CETP Maharashtra Dombiveli CETP Phase-I Dombiveli CETP Phase-II Thane Belapur CETP
Type of industries
198 Milk/ food processing, textile, rubber, leather 26 metal finishing inits 5 Tannery
1 2
About 0.11 MT/d sludge is stored in a impervious sludge storage yard within CETP premises About 100 MT/month sludge is sent to CHWTSDF-Mumbai waste Management Ltd. site at Taloja About 120 MT/month sludge is sent to CHWTSDF-Mumbai waste Management Ltd. site at Taloja About 8 MT/d sludge is generated. Sludge is sent to CHWTSDF site at TTC About 6 MT/month sludge is sent to CHWTSDF-Mumbai waste Management Ltd. site at Taloja About 2 MT/d sludge is generated. Sludge is sent to CHWTSDF- Mumbai waste Management Ltd. site at Taloja About 0.15 MT/d sludge is generated. Sludge is used for land filling. About 0.3 MT/d sludge is generated. Sludge is used for land filling. About 10-11 MT/month sludge is sent to CHWTSDFMumbai waste Management Ltd. site at Taloja
1 2 3
118 Textile industries 157 Multiple/mixed industries 480 Dye & Intermediate Drug intermediate, Pharmaceuticals Chemicals(1905 non member) 208 Pharma., Chemical, Dye&dye intermediate 780 Pharma & other industries Chemical and Dyes Textile, Chemicals, Dairy, Auto parts, Batteries Chemical, Textile, Petrochemical
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1
Tarapur CETP Taloja CETP Ambernath CETP Jaisingpur CETP Patalganga CETP Mahad CETP Badlapur CETP Butibari CETP MP Govindpura CETP, Bhopal Punjab Phillore CETP Jalandhar CETP
34 Industries
1 2
28 Tanneries (27 vegetable, 1 chrome) 67 tanning and allied industries (39 chrome) 600 Textile dyeing and printing (CETP designed for 319 units) 60 Textile dyeing and printing
Jodhpur CETP
4 5 6 7 8
1 2 3 4
Bhiwadi CETP Pali CETP Unit I Pali CETP Unit II Pali CETP Unit III Machheri CETP, Jaipur Tamilnadu Mannarai CETP, Tirupur Kasipalayam CETP, Tirupur Veerapondi CETP, Tirupur Manickapuram CETP, Tirupur
100 Stainless steel pickling and 150 Textile dyeing and printing 55 industries + sewage 473 Textile units+ sewage for Unit I&II
Sludge is dumped unscientifically within CETP premises. A common secured land fill site is to be developed in 50 hectare land for Balotra, Jasol and Bithuja CETPs Sludge is dumped unscientifically within CETP premises. A common secured land fill site is to be developed in 50 hectare land for Balotra, Jasol and Bithuja CETPs Sludge stored in a pucca pit within CETP premises. A 25 acre land has been identified and EIA study is being carried out for setting secured land fill site. No arrangement for disposal of ludge About 300 MT/month sludge generated from the three CETPs at Pali is dumped unscientifically near Puniyata rd. About 300 MT/month sludge generated from the three CETPs at Pali is dumped unscientifically near Puniyata rd. About 300 MT/month sludge generated from the three CETPs at Pali is dumped unscientifically near Puniyata rd. No arrangements for disposal of sludge
About 4.9 MT/d sludge is stored on ground within CETP premises About 2 MT/d sludge is packed in polythene bags and stored within CETP premises About 10 MT/d sludge is stored on ground within CETP premises About 1 MT/d sludge is stored on ground within CETP premises
S. No. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
CETP Kunnangalpalayam CETP, Tirupur Andipalayam CETP, Tirupur Angeripalayam CETP, Tirupur Chinnakkarai CETP Ltd., Tirupur Andakovil CETP, Karur KS CETP, Karur KKEL CETP, Karur Sellandi Palayam CETP, Karur Thiruvai CETP, Karur Valandi Dyeing CETP, Karur Taluk Dye & Bleaching CETP, Karur Amaravathi Poll Tech CETP, karur TALCO Vaniyambadi CETP, Vellore TALCO Vaniyambadi, Udayendiram CETP, Vellore TALCO Pernambut CETP TALCO Ambur Thuthipet CETP, Vellore Visharam CETP, Melvisharam Vellore TALCO Ranipet CETP, Vellore Melpudupet CETP, Ambur, Vellore Ambur Mallgalthope CETP, Vellore SIDCO Ranipet CETP, Vellore SIDCO phase II CETP Ranipet, Vellore TALCO Dindigul CETP TALCO Madhavaram CETP, Chennai Pallavaram CETP, Chennai UP Kanpur CETP Unnao CETP Mathura CETP West Bengal Calcutta Leather Complex CETP
On site storage/ Ultimate disposal of sludge About 30 m3/d sludge is packed in polythene bags and stored within CETP premises About 2.5 MT/d sludge is stored on ground within CETP premises and covered with HDPE sheet About 2.5 MT/d sludge is stored on ground within CETP premises and covered with HDPE sheet About 2.5 MT/d sludge is stored on ground within CETP premises Sludge is stored within CETP premises Sludge is stored within CETP premises About 2.7 MT/d sludge is packed in polythene bags and stored within CETP premises Sludge is stored within CETP premises About 1 MT/d sludge is stored on ground within CETP premises Sludge is stored within CETP premises Sludge is stored within CETP premises
47 Textile
55 Textile
16 17 18
About 1 MT/d sludge is stored on ground within CETP premises About 9 MT/d sludge is disposed in secured landfill within CETP premises About 0.2 MT/d sludge is disposed in secured landfill at Valaympet CETP premises About 10 MT/d sludge is stored in sludge storage yard in unscientific manner within CETP premises About 3 MT/d sludge is stored in a impervious place within CETP premises About 2 MT/d sludge is disposed in secured landfill within CETP premises About 4 MT/d sludge is disposed in secured landfill within CETP premises Sludge is dumped in an unscientific manner About 1 MT/d sludge is stored in Thuthipet CETP sludge yard About 3 MT/d sludge is stored in sludge storage yard within CETP premises. Sludge is also converted into vermin compost in batches Sludge is dumped in an unscientific manner
19 20
10 Tannery 34 Tannery
21 22 23 24 25
26
27 28 29
About 1.5 MT/d sludge is stored in sludge storage yard within CETP premises About 0.35MT/d sludge is stored within CETP premises About 10 MT/d sludge is stored in sludge storage yard within CETP premises Sludge is disposed on land by Kanpur Nagar Nigam Sludge is stored within CETP premises Sludge is stored within CETP premises Temporary sludge storage facility for 5000 to 6000 MT is under construction within CETP premises. A secured land fill site is proposed to be developed in 51 acre land
1 2 3 1
354 Tanneries 21 Tanneries 30 Textile dyeing and printing About 540-550 tanneries processing 1000 MT hides to be shifted to Calcutta Leather Complex
9.6 21.6 100 4+2+3 477.84 Under construction 4 MLD under construction Textiles
2 3 4 5 6
1 2 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Roha Dombivili-3 Tarapur-2 Kherana, Navi Mumbai Chikhloli Morivili, Ambernath M.P. Gwalior Raipur Punjab Ludhiana-1 Ludhiana-2 Ludhiana-3 Amritsar Rajasthan Balotra Unit II Bithuja Sumerpur Tamilnadu Chettithangal Eruguthimallnedu Perumalpet Puddur Mitta Standard Effluent Erode-1 Erode-2 Erode-3 Karur-1 Karur-2 Karur-3 Karur-4 Karur-5 Karur-6 Kodaikanal Chennimalai Kumarapalyam Anaipalayam Mangalam Kulathupalyam
42 Pesticides, Dye & Dye intermediate, Paint, Petrochemical 13 200 915 Bulk drugs & int-71, Textiles-2, Dyes & dye intermediate-2 74 74
12.00 30.00
139 154 552 142 259 245 1025 102 400 172 214 143 177 168 225 103 98 100 543 408 553
S. No 22 23 24 25 1
CETP site Muruganpalyam Kasipalyam Cuddalore Ambur UP Raipur, Rania, Kanpur West Bengal Calcutta Leather Complex CETP Kalaidanga Behala Kasba
Cap. MLD
Construction stage
Type and number of industries 53 86 28 18 Ed.oil refineries, Textiles, Steel, Chemicals, Paper, Tanneries(80)
2 3 4
About 550 tanneries processing 1000 MT hides to be shifted to the Complex 600