6
6
6
Lecture Outline
Introduction to foreign exchange exposures Translation exposure Transaction exposure To hedge or not? Hedging techniques Operating exposure Managing Operating exposure
Example
A Taiwanese company has the following USD exposures: 1. Owns a factory in Texas worth US$5 million. 2. Agreement to buy goods worth US$2 million. 3. Biggest competitor is a US company.
What happens if the NT dollar appreciates? 1. NT$ value of US factory goes down (translation). 2. NT$ cost of buying goods goes down (transaction). 3. Global competitiveness of Taiwanese company decreases (operating).
Translation Exposure
Translation exposure, also called accounting exposure, arises because financial statements of foreign subsidiaries which are stated in foreign currency must be restated in the parents reporting currency for the firm to prepare consolidated financial statements. Translation exposure is the potential for an increase or decrease in the parents net worth and reported net income caused by a change in exchange rates since the last translation.
The accounting process of translation, involves converting these foreign subsidiaries financial statements into home currency-denominated statements.
Translation Methods
Two basic methods for the translation of foreign subsidiary financial statements are employed worldwide: The current rate method The temporal method
Regardless of which method is employed, a translation method must not only designate at what exchange rate individual balance sheet and income statement items are remeasured, but also designate where any imbalance is to be recorded (current income or an equity reserve account).
Temporal Method
Under the temporal method, specific assets are translated at exchange rates consistent with the timing of the items creation.
This method assumes that a number of individual line item assets such as inventory and net plant and equipment are restated regularly to reflect market value. Gains or losses resulting from remeasurement are carried directly to current consolidated income, and not to equity reserves (increased variability of consolidated earnings).
10
Transaction Exposure
Transaction exposure measures changes in the value of outstanding financial obligations incurred prior to a change in exchange rates but not due to be settled until after the exchange rates change.
Thus, this type of exposure deals with changes in cash flows that result from existing contractual obligations.
11
The U.S. seller expects to exchange the 1,800,000 for $1,620,000 when payment is received.
13
14
When the loan came due five years later, the cost of repayment of principal was 22.73 million more than double the amount borrowed!
15
To Hedge or not?
Hedging is the taking of a position, either acquiring a cash flow or an asset or a contract (including a forward contract) that will rise (fall) in value to offset a fall (rise) in value of an existing position.
Hedging, therefore, protects the owner of the existing asset from loss (but it also eliminates any gain resulting from changes in exchange rates on the value of the exposure).
16
To Hedge or not?
17
To Hedge or not?
Is the reduction of variability in cash flows then sufficient reason for currency risk management?
This question is actually a continuing debate in multinational financial management and corporate finance. There are several schools of thought.
18
Opponents of Hedging
Opponents of currency hedging commonly make the following arguments:
Stockholders are much more capable of diversifying currency risk than the management of the firm. Currency risk management does not add value to the firm and it incurs costs. Hedging might benefit corporate management more than shareholders.
19
Proponents of Hedging
Proponents of hedging cite:
Reduction in risk in future cash flows improves the planning capability of the firm. Reduction of risk in future cash flows reduces the likelihood that the firms cash flows will fall below a necessary minimum (the point of financial distress). Management has a comparative advantage over the individual shareholder in knowing the actual currency risk of the firm. Individuals and corporations do not have same access to hedging instruments or same cost.
20
Reasons for FX derivatives usage (frequently + sometimes): 89% hedge on Balance Sheet commitments. 85% hedge anticipated transactions within one year. 39% hedge longer term economic exposure. Extent of exposures hedged: 49% of on-BS commitments. 42% of anticipated transactions within one year. 7% of economic exposure.
21
22
Money Market hedge: Taking a money market position to hedge future receivables/payables
Currency option hedge A way to hedge downside exposure Structuring the Hedge exporters (sell USD, buy AUD) - receivables importers (Buy USD, sell AUD) - payables
23
Hedging Techniques
Hedging of Receivables
Hedging of Payables
24
Example
Assume Boeing is expected to receive 10m GBP () in one years time. Available information: one-year forward rate: US$1.46/ spot rate: US$1.50/ put option on pounds expires in one year with strike of US$1.46 and premium of US$0.02 interest rates:
US: UK: 6.10% per annum 9.00% per annum
25
F = $1.46
ST
26
$14.6m $14.38m
Forward Hedge
28
Operating Exposure
Operating exposure, also called economic exposure, competitive exposure, and even strategic exposure on occasion, measures any change in the present value of a firm resulting from changes in future operating cash flows caused by an unexpected change in exchange rates.
Measuring the operating exposure of a firm requires forecasting and analyzing all the firms future individual transaction exposures together with the future exposures of all the firms competitors and potential competitors worldwide.
30
Operating Exposure
Operating exposure is far more important for the long-run health of a business than changes caused by transaction or accounting exposure.
Operating exposure is inevitably subjective, because it depends on estimates of future cash flow changes over an arbitrary time horizon. Planning for operating exposure is a total management responsibility because it depends on the interaction of strategies in finance, marketing, purchasing, and production.
31
Operating Exposure
An expected change in foreign exchange rates is not included in the definition of operating exposure, because both management and investors should have factored this information into their evaluation of anticipated operating results and market value.
From an investors perspective, if the foreign exchange market is efficient, information about expected changes in exchange rates should be reflected in a firms market value. Only unexpected changes in exchange rates, or an inefficient foreign exchange market, should cause market value to change.
32
33
Direct Exposure
Sales abroad Source abroad Profits abroad Unfavourable Favourable Unfavourable
Indirect Exposure
Competitor sources abroad Unfavourable Supplier sources abroad Favourable Favourable Unfavourable
36
Exchange rate exposure for BHP Billiton (86 02) RBHP = 0.0119 0.8148 $A/$US
(2.46) (4.94)
37
38
Example
Matsushita exports TVs to the US. Suppose the yen is expected to move from 130/$ to 110/$ over the next few years. What can Matsushita do about its currency risk? As yen appreciates, Matsushita becomes less competitive. Can it increase prices in the US? Probably not as TV market is competitive. It can keep US$ prices constant to retain market share but this will hurt profits. Can it cut costs and become more efficient? Matsushita could move production to US or low-cost US$ zone. Move to high-end TVs or other products with less price competition. Hedge using currency derivatives. Stop selling in US markets.
40