STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION OF ECOSYSTEM

 Introduction to Ecology and Ecosystem

 Classification of Ecosystem
 Attributes of Ecosystem
 Structure of Ecosystem
 Function of Ecosystem

INTRODUCTION
We had earlier defined ecology and ecosystem. To enhance our understanding
of ecology and ecosystem, we shall have a small review of these terms.

Ecology comes from the greek words oikos (house or place where one lives) and
logos(study of). It can be surmised as the Study of the “House” in which We Live.
This term was introduced by Ernst Haeckl in 1869. Ecology can be defined more
specifically as the study of the interactions between organisms and the nonliving
components of their environment. ecology involves collecting information about
organisms and their environment, looking for patterns, and seeking to explain
these patterns.

The Biosphere is composed of smaller units called ecosystems. An ecosystem

includes all the organisms and the nonliving environment that are found in a
particular place. Ecosystems can be as large or as small as we decide. Any
area you decide to Study can be considered an Ecosystem. For example you
may choose to study your back yard, a multi storeyed apartment, a mountain
range or a forest/zoo. Any of these would be considered an Ecosystem. In an
ecosystem, there are various levels of organisation.

The simplest level of organization in Ecosystem is that of the organism. An

organism refers to a particular organism in an ecosystem, say cat, dog etc. A
population includes all the members of the same organism that live in one place
at one time. All the different populations that live in a particular area make up a
community. The physical location of a Community is called the habitat.
Ecosystem is in turn a level of organisation and has one higher level of
organisation called biosphere. The photograph on the next page derived from a
foreign ecology book would clearly illustrate the various levels of organisation.
The diversity of an ecosystem is a measure of the number of different species
there, and how common each species is. Ecosystems are very complex. They
can contain hundreds or even thousands of interacting species. Each organism
or species in the community has a role or profession in that community and in
ecology this is the organism’s niche.
CLASSIFICATION OF ECOSYSTEM

An ecosystem can be classified as below

ECOSYSTEM

NATURAL ECOSYSTEM ARTIFICIAL ECOSYSTEM

TERRESTRIAL AQUATIC
ECOSYSTEM ECOSYSTEM
Forests Fresh Waters
Grasslands Marine Waters
Deserts

There are further classifications in the above chart, but for a beginner level, it is
enough to concentrate on these areas. Also the study of artificial ecosystem is
not the scope of an environmental scientist. The environmentalists deal with
natural creations and management only. Moreover the system in artificial
ecosystem does not offer much to study. Therefore we are more interested in
natural ecosystem and don’t consider artificial ecosystem

APPROACH TO ECOSYSTEM

With an ecosystem comprising of large number of speices, it would seem and is

impractical to study the interaction of each organism with another, It is
impossible to approach an ecosystem by studying the individual organism –
environment relationship. Therefore we study an ecosystem following an
wholesome approach.

We study the ecosystems by studying the two aspects (attributes) of an

ecosystem. They are

(1) Structure or Architectural Process (2) Function or Working Process

STRUCTURE OF AN ECOSYSTEM

By Architecture or Structure of an Ecosystem, we mean

 the composition of biological community including species, numbers,

biomass, life history and distribution in space, etc.
 the quantity and distribution of non living materials like nutrients, water etc.
 the conditions of existence such as temperature, light etc.

An ecosystem possesses both living components and biotic factors and nonliving
or abiotic factors.

The nonliving factors, called abiotic factors, are physical and chemical
characteristics of the environment. They include solar energy (amount of sun
light), oxygen, CO2, water, temperature, humidity, ph, and availability of nitrogen.

The living components of the environment are called Biotic Factors. They include
all the Living Things that affect an organism. Biotic Components are often
categorized as Producers, Consumers, and Decomposer.

The structure of an ecosystem can be represented as below

ECOSYSTEM

ABIOTIC COMPONENTS BIOTIC COMPONENTS

CLIMATIC EDAPHIC
FACTORS FACTORS
PRODUCERS CONSUMERS DECOMPOSERS
E.g. Rain E.g. Soil
Light Minerals also known as also known as better known as
Wind Oxygen autotrophs, heterotrophs, reducers or
Temp. Topography they produce they consume saptrotrophs
energy and transfer recycle energy
energy
 FUNCTION OF AN ECOSYSTEM

The function of an ecosystem is a broad, vast and often confused topic.

The function of an ecosystem can be best studied by understanding the history of
ecological studies. The function of an ecosystem can be studied under the three
heads.
1. Trophic Level Interaction
2. Ecological Succession
3. Biogeochemistry

Trophic Level Interaction deals with how the members of an ecosystem

are connected based on nutritional needs. Ecological Succession deals with the
changes in features/members of an ecosystem over a period of time.
Biogeochemistry is focussed upon the cycling of essential materials in an
ecosystem.
As we would be discussing about ecological succession and bio geo
chemistry in the future chapters, we shall confine to Trophic level interaction
alone in this chapter. For examination purposes, the student may also stop with
explaining the constituents of trophic level interaction.
Trophic Level Interaction was developed by zoologist Charles Elton. It
deals with who eats who and is eaten by whom in an ecosystem. The study of
trophic level interaction in an ecosystem gives us an idea about the energy flow
through the ecosystem.
The trophic level interaction involves three concepts namely
1. Food Chain
2. Food Web
3. Ecological Pyramids

FOOD CHAIN
In an ecosystem one can observe the transfer or flow of energy from one trophic
level to other in succession. A trophic level can be defined as the number of links
by which it is separated from the producer, or as the wh position of the organism
in the food chain. The patterns of eating and being eaten forms a linear chain
called food chain which can always be traced back to the producers. Thus,
primary producers trap radiant energy of sun and transfer that to chemical or
potential energy of organic compounds such as carbohydrates, proteins and fats.

When a herbivore animal eats a plant (or when bacteria decompose it) and these
organic compounds are oxidized, the energy liberated is just equal to the amount
of energy used in synthesizing the substances (first law of thermodynamics), but
some of the energy is heat and not useful energy (second law of
thermodynamics). If this animal, in rum, is eaten by another one, along with
transfer of energy from a herbivore to carnivore a further decrease in useful
energy occurs as the second animal (carnivore) oxidizes the organic substances
of the first (herbivore or omnivore) to liberate energy to synthesize its own
cellular constituents. Such transfer of energy from organism to organism sustains
the ecosystem and when energy is transferred from individual to individual in a
particular community, as in a pond or a lake or a river, we come across the food
chains. The number of steps in a food chain are always restricted to four or five,
since the energy available decreases with each step. Many direct or indirect
methods arc employed to study food chain relationships in nature. They include
gut content analysis, use of radioactive isotopes, precipitin test, etc.
 In nature, basically two types of food chains arc recognized—grazing food
chain and detritus food chain.
1. Grazing food chain. This type of food chain (Fig. 9.4) starts from the living
green plants, goes to grazing herbivores and on to the carnivores. Ecosystems
with such type of food chain are directly dependent on an influx of solar radiation.
Thus, this type of food chain depends on autotrophic energy capture and the
movement of this energy to herbivores. Most of the ecosystems in nature follow
this type of food chain. These chains are very significant from energy standpoint.
The phytoplanktons -> zooplanktons -» fish sequence or the grasses -> rabbit ->
fox sequence arc the examples of grazing food chain. Further the producer ->
herbivore -> carnivore chain is a predator chain. Parasitic chains also exist
wherein smaller organisms consume larger ones without outright killing as the
case of the predators.
2. Detritus food chain. The organic wastes, exudates and dead matter derived
from the grazing food chain are generally termed detritus. The energy contained
in this detritus in not lost to the ecosystem as a whole; rather it serves as the
source of energy for a group of organisms (dctritivorcs that are separate from the
grazing food chain, and generally termed as the detritus food chain (Fig. 9.5).
Tl\e detritus food chain represents an exceedingly important component in the
energy (low of an ecosystem. Indeed in some ecosystems, considerably more
en-ergy flows through the detritus food chain than through the grazing food
chain. In the detritus food chain the energy flow remains as a continuous
passage rather than as a stepwise flow between discrete entities. The organisms
of the detritus food chain are many and include algae, bacteria, slime molds,
actinomycetes, fungi. Protozoa, insects mites. Crustacea, centipedes, molluscs,
rotifers, annelid worms, nematodes and some vertebrates. Some species are
highly specific in their food requirements and some can eat almost anything.
detritus itself.
Significance of food chain : The food chain studies/help under stand the
feeding relationships and the interaction between organisms in anv ecosystem.
They also help us to appreciate the energy flow mecha- nism and matter
circulation in eco- system, and understand the movement of toxic substances in
the eco-system and the problem of biological magnification
FOOD WEB
In nature simple ood chains occur rarely The same organism may operate in the
ecosystem at more than one trophic level i.e it may derive its food from more
than one source. Even the same organism may be eaten by several organisms of
a higher trophic level or an organism may feed upon several different organisms
of a lower trophic level. usually the kind of food changes with the age of the
organism and the food availability. Thus in a given ecosystem various food
chains are linked together and interested each other to form a complex network
called food Web. Generally food webs are not too complex. As more and more
species are involved in a web the connectance falls. Expect in insect
communities, omnivores are scare and when they occur they usually feed on
species in adjacent trophic levels. Within habitats, food webs arc rarely broken
up into discrete compartments. The number of species of predators in a food web
typi-cally exceeds the number of species of prey by an aver-age of 1.3 predator
species per prey species.
ECOLOGICAL PYRAMIDS
In the successive steps of grazing food chain-photosynthetic autotrophs,
herbivorous heterotrophs, carnivores heterotrophs, decay bactcria-the number
and mass of the or-ganisms in each step is lim-ited by the amount of en-ergy
available. Since some energy is lost as heat, in each transformation the steps
become progressively smaller near the top. This relationship is sometimes called
ecological pyramid. The ecological pyramids represent the trophic structure and
also trophic function of the ecosystem. In many ecological pyramids, the
producer form the base and the successive trophic levels make up the apex.
The ecological pyramids may be of following three kinds:
1. Pyramid of number: It depicts the number of individual organisms at
different trophic levels of food chain. This pyramid was advanced by Charles
Elton (1927), who pointed out the great difference in the number of the
organisms involved in each step of the food chain. The animals at the lower end
(base of pyramid) of the chain arc the most abundant. Successive links of
carnivores decrease rapidly in number until there are very few carnivores at the
top. The pyramid of number ignores the biomass of organisms and it also docs
not indicate the energy transferred or the use of energy by the groups in vol ved.
The lake ecosystem provides a typical example for pyramid of number.
2. Pyramid of biomass: The biomass of the members of the food chain
present at any one time forms the pyramid of the biomass. Pyramid of biomass
indicates decrease of biomass in each trophical level from base to apex. For
example, the total biomass of the producers ingested by herbivores is more than
the total biomass of the herbivores in an ecosystem. Likewise, the total biomass
of the primary carnivores (or secondary consumer) will be less man the
herbivores and so on.
3. Pyramid of energy: When production is considered in terms of energy, the
pyramid indicates not only the amount of energy flow at each level, but more
important, the actual role the various organisms play in the transfer of energy.
The base upon which the pyramid of energy is constructed is the quantity of
organisms produced per unit lime, or in other words, the rate at which food
material passes through the food chain. Some organisms may have a small
biomass, but the total energy they jssimilate and pass on, may be considerably
greater than that of organisms with a much larger biomass. Energy pyramids are
always slopping because less energy is transferred from each level than was
paid into it. In cases such as in open water communities the producers have less
bulk than consumers but the energy they store and pass on must be greater than
that of the next level. Otherwise the biomass that producers support could not be
greater than that of the producers themselves. This high energy flow is
maintained by a rapid turn over of individual plankton, rather than an increase of
total mass.

Pyramid of Bio Mass

Pyramid of Numbers
Pyramid of Energy