Condition Report
Condition Report
Condition Report
SALEM OR 97301
Pavement Preservation
Taking Care of What We Have
Prepared By
2010 PAVEMENT CONDITION REPORT Table of Contents Page Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... Highway System Definition ........................................................................................................... Mileage Reporting.................................................................................................................... State Classification System ..................................................................................................... Low Volume Highways........................................................................................................... Survey Procedures.......................................................................................................................... Distress Survey Procedure ...................................................................................................... GFP Rating Procedure ............................................................................................................. Pavement Conditions .................................................................................................................... Condition by Classification..................................................................................................... Condition by Region................................................................................................................ ii 1 2 2 3 3 4 5 6 8 8 9
Fair-or-Better Summary .......................................................................................................... 10 Pavement Needs, Mileage Treated, and Funding........................................................................ 11 Pavement Life Cycle................................................................................................................ 11 Treatment Needs ...................................................................................................................... 11 Mileage Treated........................................................................................................................ 12 Pavement Funding Programs .................................................................................................. 13 Pavement Conditions and Funding Levels ............................................................................ 14
Appendices A. 2010 Pavement Condition Summaries B. 2010 Pavement Condition Ratings by Pavement Management Section C. 2009 and 2010 Mileage Treated Summary and Project Listing D. Computation of Condition Indices
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report presents the results of pavement condition surveys conducted on the state highway system during 2010. These surveys are conducted on mainline state highways under ODOT's jurisdiction, excluding frontage roads, connector ramps, and gravel surfaced roads. The report appendices provide pavement condition summaries across highway classes and jurisdictional boundaries and provide a listing of pavement condition ratings for all state highways by pavement management section. Pavement conditions have improved slightly since the last rating was conducted in 2008 and the overall fair or better measure has increased from 85% in 2008 to 86% for 2010. This increase is due to roughly $100 million of new investment in pavement preservation projects on state highways as part of the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) economic stimulus legislation. This one-time funding boost addressed critical preservation needs on over 600 lane miles of highway, or about 3% of the state highway network. If the ARRA projects had not been constructed, the 2010 fair or better measure would be 84%, which is 2% less than it is today. Historically, pavement conditions have mirrored funding levels. Between 1999 and 2005, funding levels and pavement conditions rose together. Between 2005 and 2008 they both declined. In 2009, the ARRA program provided a large boost in funding and 2010 pavement conditions correspondingly improved. However, declining revenues have forced cuts to pavement funding levels for 2011 through 2015, and presumably well into the future. Pavement funding levels are now lower than they have been in a decade. Moreover, inflation has further reduced purchasing power as paving costs are much higher than they were in the 1990s. As a result, pavement conditions are projected to decline throughout the coming decade.
100% $250 ARRA "Stimulus"
90%
80% $100
70% $50
60%
$0
08
02
06
10
00
04
98
20
12
14
20
20
20
20
20
19
Actual pavement funding levels are shown. Values are not adjusted for inflation effects.
ii
20
20
20
16
Interstate non-add miles (approximately 728 miles) are included in this reports "Interstate" and "All Highways" summary tables Connectors and frontage roads (approximately 620 miles) are excluded from this reports summary tables Gravel surfaced highways (approximately 23 miles) are excluded from this reports summary tables Highways which ODOT no longer maintains but which remain under ODOTs jurisdiction (presently only Tiller-Trail Highway 230, 11.25 miles) are excluded from this reports summary tables
To remain consistent with the historical reporting of condition data, only the add centerline mileage is used to determine percent fair-or-better statistical summaries for the Non-Interstate highways. For the Interstate highways, both the add and non-add centerline mileage is used.
State Classification System - The State Classification System (SCS) is used by the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) to guide management and investment decisions regarding state highway facilities. The four SCS classifications are Interstate, State, Region, and District. Although the SCS highways are independent of the NHS classification, the Interstate classification highways are NHS and the majority of the State classification highways are NHS. The majority of the Region and District classification highways are part of the Non-NHS. Descriptions of these classifications are included in the 1999 Oregon Highway Plan. Low Volume Highways A subset of state highways with an average daily traffic (ADT) of less than 5,000 vehicles and 20-year equivalent single axle truck loads (ESALs) less than 3 million are referred to in the summary tables of this report as Low Volume Highways. These highways are funded under the Low Volume Road (LVR) Preservation Program, which is separate from the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Preservation Program. This program was established with the 1999 Oregon Highway Plan and started with just Region and District level highways with an average daily traffic (ADT) of less than 1,000 vehicles. The intent of this program was to maintain these highways at their 1999 conditions with thin "maintenance only" treatments such as chip seals or thin overlays. As a result of treatment efficiencies, pavement conditions on low volume highways increased beyond expectations and for the 2005-2007 biennium, the ADT threshold was increased to 2,500. The threshold was raised yet again for the 2009-2011 biennium to 5,000 vehicles per day in order to keep pavement conditions balanced across traffic levels. Faced with declining conditions and reduced funding levels, another change will be implemented for the upcoming 2009-2011 biennium to add statewide level highways which were previously excluded from the program. An additional filter of less than 3 million ESALs projected over 20-years was added to ensure that routes with significant heavy truck volumes would remain in the STIP Preservation program for thicker treatments where appropriate. Presently, the Low Volume Preservation program maintains approximately 41% of the state highway centerline mileage.
Survey Procedures
The Pavement Management Team employs two separate and distinct pavement rating procedures to gather the condition data - the Distress Survey procedure and the GFP rating procedure. The Distress Survey procedure provides important information that can be used to determine specific pavement problems and deficiencies. However, the data collection required by this procedure is costly and time/labor intensive. To achieve the best balance of cost and value of the data, this procedure is used to rate Oregons Interstate Highways and National Highway System (NHS) highways. For 2010, selected higher volume non-NHS highways were also rated with this procedure. Remaining routes were rated using the windshield based GFP rating procedure. From each rating procedure, a condition score is determined ranging from 0 to 100 which relates to pavement condition as shown in Table 1.
Table 1 - Relationship Between Pavement Score and Condition Condition Score 96 - 100 76 - 95 46 - 75 21 - 45 0 - 20 Pavement Condition Very Good (VG) Good (GD) Fair (FR) Poor (PR) Very Poor (VP)
Photos showing examples of pavement in good through very poor condition are shown in Figure 1.
Good
Fair
Poor
Very
The pavement condition survey work is generally completed during a span of approximately five months. The surveys typically begin in late April and conclude in September. Depending on the timing of the surveys, some of the paving work completed during the construction season may not be included in the information that is gathered by the condition raters. In order to account for the new construction and rehabilitation work, the Pavement Management Team compiles a list of pavement rehabilitation projects from various sources, including each region. With this information, the condition survey data is updated to reflect the state of the pavement conditions at the end of the paving season. For the condition summary tables, the sections of highway reported as being under construction in 2010 are included in the good pavement condition category. Distress Survey Procedure - The Distress Survey procedure was first fully implemented by ODOTs Pavement Services Unit in 1993 to rate the Interstate and NHS highways. The procedure incorporates a detailed visual evaluation of the pavement with identification and quantification of specific pavement distresses and defects. A distress survey manual with procedures, distress definitions and photos specific to rating Oregons state highways was developed based on the SHRP "Distress Identification Manual for the Long-Term Pavement Performance Project. The Distress Survey Manual is available online at:
http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/HWY/CONSTRUCTION/docs/pavement/Distress_Survey_Manual.pdf
Prior to 2008, distresses were collected manually using two person crews driving at slow speeds on the road shoulder. Because of safety concerns and advancements in camera and imaging technology which are now available, ODOT contracted with Pathway Services Inc. in 2008 to utilize specialized vehicles which incorporate a variety of laser and camera systems to capture the data at highway speeds. Photos of the Pathway vehicle are shown in Figure 2.
Distress data are collected from a designated lane (generally the outside or right through lane) for each roadbed surveyed. On the Interstate system, both the add and non-add directions are collected. For highways off the Interstate system, distress surveys are generally conducted in the add milepoint direction only. The highway is divided into 0.1 mile segments and distress quantities are tabulated and stored for each segment. A 100% sampling of the rated lane is utilized to minimize sampling errors. For most roads, the outside lane is the most severely distressed and is the appropriate lane to use to categorize the condition of the highway. There are a few instances where the outside lane is not the 5
most severely deteriorated. This generally occurs where rutting is the dominant distress type present. For example, Interstate 205 (State Highway 064) between Oregon City and the Washington border has three lanes in both directions. The rutting damage in the center lane is more severe in some locations than it is in the outside lane. For these sections the rut data from the center lane is used in the determination of the pavement condition index. Other highways where rut data is obtained from the center lane (where the highway has more than two lanes) are I-5 (State Highway 001) from Salem to the Washington State line, I-84 (State Highway 002) from I-5 to 181st Avenue, and the Sunset Hwy US-26 (State Highway 047) from Cornell Road I-405. Otherwise the condition index that is reported is based on the distress present in the outside travel lane only. The distress data is loaded into a database and used to calculate 0 to 100 index values that reflect specific pavement defects with larger values indicating better pavement condition. Six condition index values are determined for each 0.1 mile segment along the highway: a rut index, a raveling index, a patching index, a fatigue index, a no load (environmental) index, and an overall index. The overall index is used to categorize the condition of the pavement section as good, fair, poor, etc. as shown previously in Table 1. Calculation procedures for determining the index values are described in Appendix D. GFP Rating Procedure - The GFP rating procedure (GFP stands for Good-Fair-Poor) is a windshield survey conducted visually by experienced raters at highway speeds to determine an overall pavement condition score. Each section is given a condition score ranging in value from 0 to 100, estimated to the nearest 5 points, based on the surface distresses present and, to a lesser degree, ride quality. This method has been used by the Department since 1976 and is appropriate for determining overall pavement conditions; however the lack of detail makes it more difficult to make the decisions regarding appropriate maintenance treatment selection and timing. The advantage of this method is the low cost and speed at which the ratings can be completed relative to the Distress Survey procedure. A disadvantage of the GFP Rating procedure is that no specific pavement distress information is recorded. This rating procedure is generally used for rating lower volume highways which are not part of the National Highway System. Personnel from the ODOT Pavement Services Unit conduct all GFP ratings. The rating team members for the 2010 surveys are shown below.
John Coplantz (Pavement Management Engineer, P.E.) Garrett Carter (Pavement Specialist) Corry Lovinger (Pavement Specialist) Brian Sullivan (Pavement Specialist) Jeff Shambaugh (Pavement Specialist) Elizabeth Hunt (former Pavement Services Engineer, P.E.)
The GFP Pavement Condition Rating Manual is available online at: http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/HWY/CONSTRUCTION/docs/pavement/GFP_manual.pdf Figure 3 below provides an example of GFP Pavement Rating descriptions for asphalt pavement.
Pavement Conditions
Pavement condition is one of ODOTs key performance measures and is reported as the percentage of pavement mileage rated fair condition or better out of total state highway miles. Figure 4 below presents the latest measure, along with a pie chart showing the percentage of state highway mileage in very good through fair condition in 2010, and the corresponding change since 2008.
86% FAIR-ORBETTER VERY GOOD 15% VERY POOR 2% GOOD 48%
(+2%)
POOR 12%
(-1%)
FAIR 23%
(-1%)
Pavement conditions have improved slightly since the last rating was conducted in 2008 and the overall fair or better measure has increased from 85% in 2008 to 86% for 2010. This increase is due to roughly $100 million of new investment in pavement preservation projects on state highways as part of the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) economic stimulus legislation. This one-time funding boost addressed critical preservation needs on over 600 lane miles of highway, or about 3% of the state highway network. If the ARRA projects had not been constructed, the 2010 fair or better measure would be 84%, which is 2% less than it is today. Appendix A provides summaries of pavement conditions across highway classes and jurisdictional boundaries in both tabular and graphical form. Appendix B provides a detailed listing of pavement condition for each pavement management section grouped by district and sorted by highway and milepoint. Condition by Classification Figure 5 shows pavement conditions for each class of highway in accordance with the state classification system (SCS) and the low volume system. The results are consistent with ODOTs pavement preservation strategy which places the highest priority on interstate routes, with lower target conditions on other routes.
100%
2% 4% 12%
1% 12%
1%
3%
2%
15% 17%
13%
80%
23% 39%
18%
15% 23%
18%
60%
43%
40%
48% 46%
60% 49%
55%
20%
26% 15% 11%
INTERSTATE STATE
9%
REGION
8%
DISTRICT
12%
0%
ALL HWYS LOW VOLUME
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Very Poor
Interstate Although the Interstate fair-or-better mileage declined only 1% since 2008, the Interstate has a significantly higher percentage of fair pavement than the other highways. This reflects the advancing age of interstate pavement that will need resurfacing to extend service life. State Level The fair-or-better mileage for State level highways was 87%, which is approximately the same as it has been since 2003. Region and District Level The fair-or-better mileage for Region and District level highways gained 5% and 2%, respectively, from 2008. Low Volume The fair-or-better mileage for Low Volume highways gained 2% from 2008. All of the gains in Region and District level highways were on the Low Volume system and were primarily the result of preservation projects constructed with ARRA stimulus funds.
Condition by Region Figure 6 shows pavement conditions for each region. The general observation is that pavement conditions in Regions 1 and 2 have held near the same level they were at the beginning of the decade while conditions in Regions 3, 4, and 5, which made big gains in that same time period, are heading back downward.
REGION 1
GOOD 36% VERY GOOD 7% VERY POOR 2%
FAIR 35%
POOR 20%
REGION 2
GOOD 47%
REGION 4
GOOD 48%
REGION 5
FAIR 23%
REGION 3
GOOD 39%
FAIR 29%
Fair-or-Better Summary - Table 2 below gives a breakdown of the percentage of state highways with pavement in fair-or-better condition by highway class and region. Numbers in parentheses are the change in condition since the last report in 2008.
Table 2 Percent Fair-or-Better Summary by Classification and Region Class Interstate Non-Interstate (excl. Low Vol.) Low Volume* Total Reg. 1 95% 72% 72% 78%
(-2%)
Total 96%
(-1%)
83%
(+0%)
85%
(+2%)
86%
(+1%)
* Low Volume highways with average daily traffic (ADT) of less than 5,000 vehicles and 20-year ESALs less than 3 million. The low volume summaries are a subset of and are included in the non-interstate and total highway summaries.
10
Treatment Needs There is about 18,000 lane miles of pavement on the mainline state highway network. This figure excludes gravel roads, structures, connector ramps and frontage roads. About 95% of ODOTs state highway network is asphalt surfaced. Resurfacing or rehabilitation treatments on asphalt surfaced pavements last about 10 to 15 years before another one is required, depending on traffic, environmental conditions, resurfacing thickness, and maintenance practices. Seal coat treatments such as chip seals can extend the resurface interval to 25 years or more on some low and moderate traffic asphalt surfaced roads by providing a barrier against the harmful effects of moisture, aging, and traffic. Some asphalt surfaced pavements are too damaged to cost effectively
11
rehabilitate and must be reconstructed. About 5% of the state highway network is concrete pavement which typically needs resurfacing or replacement after 30 to 50 years of service. Annual rehabilitation and resurfacing mileage needs for the state highway network can be approximated by dividing the number of lane miles by the typical life span of resurfacing and rehabilitation treatments. The state highway network has a mix of different pavement types with different treatments required and different life spans for each. The network can be broken into broad general categories as shown in Figure 8 below to determine overall treatment needs. If ODOT can keep up with this treatment cycle, the pavement conditions would be in a sustainable steady state where each year the roads coming due for treatment would be programmed and there would be no backlog. Approx. Lane Miles 500 800 Typical Typical Treatment Life Span Reconstruct 20 Reconstruct 40 Total Reconstruct Resurface Resurface Total Resurface Seal Coat 13 20
Annual Need 25 lane miles 20 lane miles 45 lane miles 500 lane miles 250 lane miles 750 lane miles 650 lane miles
Asphalt Asphalt
6,500 5,000
Asphalt
Low
Mileage Treated A list of highways where paving or chip seal resurfacing treatments were completed in 2009 and 2010 was compiled and is included in Appendix C. The lists are separated by year and region. The list does not include blade patching or intermittent machine patching work. The general criteria for including on the list were:
treatment is likely to provide 5 or more years of service in fair-or-better condition non-intermittent treatment over one-half mile in length (urban) or over 1 mile in length (rural), or for shorter lengths, the majority of a pavement management section is treated resulting in an improvement in the condition rating of the section
The 2010 treatment list was used to update pavement conditions to reflect improvements which may have been made to the highway system after the rating crews survey.
12
Mileage totals for 2009 and 2010 are also provided in the appendix and are summarized in Table 3 below by program and by treatment. For each treatment type, the average yearly mileages over the 2-year period exceed the lane mile need benchmarks in the needs example illustrated previously. This explains why pavement conditions improved between 2008 and 2010. The ARRA program contributed significantly to the mileage totals, adding approximately 515 lane miles of resurfacing, 130 lane miles of chip seal treatments, and 13 lane miles of reconstruction. Without ARRA, the seal coat and reconstruction mileages would have been near the needs example lane mile benchmarks, while the resurfacing mileage would have been well below the benchmark and pavement conditions would have dropped between 2008 and 2010.
Table 3 Lane Miles Treated Totals for 2009 and 2010 By Program Year 2009 2010 Total Preservation (incl. ARRA) 920 762 1,682 Other (Mod., etc.) 88 41 129 Maintenance 516 810 1,326 Resurfacing 890 728 1,618 By Treatment Seal Coat 585 837 1,422 Reconstruct 49 48 97 Total 1,524 1,613 3,137
Pavement Funding Programs There are two main programs that ODOT uses to apply preventive maintenance and rehabilitation treatments to state highways, as follows: Preservation Program The Preservation Program is part of the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) and delivers the majority of pavement resurfacing and rehabilitation projects to Interstate and primary highways. Between the late 1990s and the mid 2000s, program funding levels steadily increased from $105 to 140 million per year. Since 2005, program funding levels have declined and now average about $100 million per year through 2015. For 2009 and 2010, an additional one-time investment of approximately $100 million was made for pavement preservation projects on state highways under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) economic stimulus legislation. This one-time funding boost addressed critical preservation needs on 600 lane miles of highway that would not have otherwise been constructed. Maintenance Program The Maintenance Program allocates approximately $16 million per year for preventive maintenance chip seal and overlay treatments on lower traffic state routes. The program maintains over 40% of total state highway mileage with less than 15% of total pavement dollars.
13
Pavement Conditions and Funding Levels Figure 9 presents a graph showing pavement condition and pavement funding levels over time. Historically, pavement conditions have mirrored funding levels. Between 1999 and 2005, funding levels and pavement conditions rose together. Between 2005 and 2008 they both declined. In 2009, the ARRA program provided a large boost in funding and 2010 pavement conditions correspondingly improved. However, declining revenues have forced cuts to pavement funding levels for 2011 through 2015, and presumably well into the future. Pavement funding levels are now lower than they have been in a decade. Moreover, inflation has further reduced purchasing power as paving costs have doubled in the last 10 years. As a result, pavement conditions are projected to decline throughout the coming decade.
100% $250 ARRA "Stimulus"
90%
80% $100
70% $50
60%
06 08 04 10 02 12 00 98 20 20 20 20 20 20 14 20 19 20 20 16
$0
Actual pavement funding levels are shown. Values are not adjusted for inflation effects.
14
This appendix provides summary tables which show mileage totals by pavement condition and by percent fair-or-better. Contents
All State Highways by Statewide Classification System All State Highways by Region Interstate Highways by Region Non-Interstate Highways by Region and Statewide Classification Non-Interstate Highways by Region / District Low Volume Highways by District
NON-INTERSTATE HWYS
2 NON-INTERSTATE HWYS
TOTAL NON-INTERSTATE
Add Direction Centerline Miles per Jan. 2010 System Definition (Excl. Connectors, Frontage and Gravel Rds.) Low Volume system defined as Non-Interstate highways with ADT less than 5,000 and 20-Year ESAL's less than 3 million
2A, 2B, 2C
This appendix presents a list of pavement condition scores and ratings for each pavement management section. The list is grouped by District and sorted by Road ID (State Highway Number). At the front of each District list is a map depicting pavement conditions. Condition Scores Interstate, National Highway System (NHS) Highways, and Selected High Volume Non-NHS Highways These highways were rated with the Distress Survey method (RATE METHOD = D in the list). A series of index scores are provided (Overall Index, Rut Index, Fatigue Index, Patch Index, No Load Index, and Raveling Index). The definition of each index is given in Appendix D. These columns show up blank for structure sections (bridge, tunnel, etc.), and sections under construction. Remaining Non-NHS Highways These highways were rated with the GFP rating method (RATE METHOD = G in the list) and therefore only an overall condition score is provided. Definitions of the rating categories are provided in Appendix E. Condition Rating The overall condition score for each rating method is used to determine the condition of the pavement management section per the table below. Score vs. Condition
Condition Score 96 - 100 76 - 95 46 - 75 21 - 45 0 - 20 Pavement Condition Very Good (VG) Good (GD) Fair (FR) Poor (PR) Very Poor (VP)
For all highways, the 0 to 100 condition score is listed under the COND SCORE column and the corresponding condition is listed under the RATING 10 column. For reference, the 2008 condition rating is also provided under the RATING 08 column. The COND SCORE column is blank for structure sections (bridge, tunnel, etc.), and sections under construction. If the RATING 08 column is blank, the section was not rated in 2008 by either condition survey procedure.
Hammond
4 10
!
Warrenton Warrenton
0! ( 10 !
009
9 00
105
Astoria Svensen
092
80
!
30
009
!
DISTRICT 1
MAP LEGEND
!
10
Olney
2 10
(
!
Gearhart
! !
0
047
(
!
30
3 10
!
Elsie 20
6 04!
101
40
Manzanitia Manzanitia
Nehalem
(
009
Wheeler
50 ( Rockaway Beach
! !
Garibaldi
(
101
60
! (
Bay City
10
!
Oceanside ! 0
131
037
Netarts
! ! (
Tillamook
70
009
101
!
80
03 9
Neskowin
!
130
13 0
22
(
!
\\s6000e\giswork\GIS23_53_Pavement_standard_and_related_maps\Pavement_Condition_2010\mxd\D1_Pave.mxd
10 !
032
153
90
101
9 00
Hebo
2 03
Yamhill County
!
22
10
!
53
20
!
26
Necanicum Junction
!
00 9
Jewell 0
!
10
26
047
103
18
153
20 Seaside
202
!
101
20
(
!
Populated Place County Boundary Hydro Feature District Office Interstate Route U.S. Route Oregon Route Highway Number
Very Good Good Fair Poor Very Poor
!
202
*
(
(
!
049
(
!
Pavement Conditions
! !
! !
! ! !
DISTRICT LOCATION
!
( !
! !
1 2A 3
(
2B 2C 9 12 13
4
!
5
!
10
( ( !
! !
7 8 11
!
14
(
! (
( (
!
0
(
Miles
! !
PRODUCED BY ODOT - GIS UNIT ! (503) 986-3154 - FEBRUARY 2011 ! GIS No. 23-53 (
(
!
I
(
!
! ! !
(
!
( (
DISCLAIMER: This product is for informational purposes only and may not have been ( prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. ! Users of this information should review or consult the primary data and information sources to ascertain the usability of the information.
( !
! ! !
(
!
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
Mayger
!
DISTRICT 2A
(
30
Clatskanie
(
60
!
092
30
50
MAP LEGEND
Populated Place County Boundary Hydro Feature
Rainier
Clatsop
10!
202
0 11
Prescott
40
Mist
10 2
Goble ! 40
50
!
0
!
30
103
Pittsburg
60
Vernonia
10 2
30
26
047
70
40
Buxton Manning 80
! !
30
037
40
7 03
091
Forest Grove (
20
!
029
219
10
PRODUCED BY ODOT - GIS UNIT (503) 986-3154 - FEBRUARY 2011 GIS No. 23-53
! (
141
Yamhill County
Yamhill
001
1 09
( Sherwood
205
06 4
10 West ( Linn (
!
140
\\s6000e\gisork\GIS23_53_Pavement_standard_and_related_maps\Pavement_Condition_2010\mxd\D2A_Pave.mxd !
Marion County
Carlton
Newberg
219
(5
Marion County
! !
081
DISCLAIMER: This product is for informational purposes only and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Users of this information should review or consult the primary data and information sources to ascertain the usability of the information.
Clackamas County
Wilsonville
240
151
99W
Miles
( Rivergrove
10
King City
43
! 99E
(
!!
Tigard ( 10!
Lake Oswego
Gaston
143
081
Tillamook County
04 7
!
47
60
! 30BY !
Multnomah County
90
(
Cornelius
Hillsboro
02 9
26 8
! !
10
70
0 047! !
Sylvan Portland
1 00
5
2 14 Beaverton
(
217
14 1
47
049
30
20!
Scappoose
DISTRICT LOCATION
50
!
1 2A 3
2B 2C 9 12 13
Banks
50
!
4 North Plains
! !
120
123
7 8
120
10 14
102
0 14
30BY
1 06
! !
! 11
002
!
84!
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
300
26
081
!
99E
Milwaukie
17 1
224 !
(
3 00
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
(
!
Columbia County
30
2 09
! !
10
30BY
091
081
123
068
30
!
001
06 1
405
! ! ! ! ! !
! !
Portland
30
84
2 00
064
Sylvan
(
!
99E
MAP LEGEND
(
Tualatin
! ! ! !
Rivergrove
10 !
Gladstone
(
205
Populated Place
(
Sherwood
( (
10
64 0 ! !0
County Boundary
!
Oregon City
Yamhill County
County
Wilsonville
!!
Canby
! !
20
7 8
049
(
!
Barlow
10
(
!
Hubbard
! ! !
\\s6000e\giswork\GIS23_53_Pavement_standard_and_related_maps\Pavement_Condition_2010\mxd\D2B_Pave.mxd
Hydro Feature
99E
213
King City
Durham
Tigard
DISTRICT 2B
43
0!
Milwaukie
(
224
Johnson City
10
Beaverton
300 ! !! 0! ! ! 0! 26
26 99E
026
213
213
! ! ! !
30BY
10
4 06
205
Maywood ( Park
10
!
30 84
20
205
( Troutdale
Gresham
(
Gresham
Happy Valley
1 08 1 08
Clackamas
Damascus
224
Eagle Creek !
160
DISTRICT LOCATION
!
1 2A 3 4 5
2B 2C 9 12 13
(
Estacada
10 14
11
Miles 1.2
PRODUCED BY ODOT - GIS UNIT (503) 986-3154 - FEBRUARY 2011 GIS No. 23-53
DISCLAIMER: This product is for informational purposes only and may not have been prepared ! for or be suitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Users of this information should review or consult the primary data and information sources to ascertain the usability of the information.
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
1 02B OR 99E 1 02B OR 99E 1 02B OR 99E 1 02B OR 99E 1 02B OR 99E 1 02B OR 99E 1 02B OR 99E 1 02B OR 99E 1 02B OR 99E 1 02B OR 99E 1 02B OR 99E
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
1 02B OR 99E 1 02B OR 99E 1 02B OR 99E 1 02B OR 99E 1 02B OR 99E 1 02B OR 99E 1 02B OR 99E 1 02B OR 99E 1 02B OR 99E 1 02B 1 02B 1 02B 1 02B 1 02B 1 02B 1 02B 1 02B 1 02B 1 02B 1 02B 1 02B 1 02B 1 02B 1 02B 1 02B
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
1 02B US 30BY 1 02B US 30BY 1 02B US 30BY 1 02B US 30BY 1 02B US 30BY 1 02B US 30BY 1 02B US 30BY 1 02B US 30BY 1 02B US 30BY 1 02B US 30BY 1 02B 1 02B 1 02B 1 02B 1 02B 1 02B 1 02B 1 02B 1 02B 1 02B 1 02B 1 02B 1 02B 1 02B 1 02B 1 02B 1 02B 1 02B OR 213 OR 213 OR 213 OR 213 OR 213 OR 213 OR 213 OR 213
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
MAP LEGEND
Pavement Conditions
Very Good Good Fair Poor Very Poor
County Boundary
*
049
123
!
50
84
!
30
40
!
50 ( 0 60 Hood River
! ! !
002
(
!
Highway Number
!
30
Cascade Locks
!
100
! ! (
40
!
(
!
Fairview
(
Multnomah County
(
( !
20 0 Troutdale
!
100
10
84
026
06 4
068 064
Gresham
Parkdale
!
Happy Valley
174
26
Johnson City
(
!
20
Damascus
02 6
(
003
( (
West !! Linn
(
10
!
224
Sandy
172
20 !
Rhododendron
211
Estacada
160
Government Camp
50
!
026
173
60
053
!
! !
30
161
60
Molalla
Miles
PRODUCED BY ODOT - GIS UNIT (503) 986-3154 - FEBRUARY 2011 GIS No. 23-53
DISCLAIMER: This product is for informational purposes only and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Users of this information should review or consult the primary data and information sources to ascertain the usability of the information.
! ( ( \\s6000e\giswork\GIS23_53_Pavement_standard_and_related_maps\Pavement_Condition_2010\mxd\D2C_Pave.mxd !
20 !
211
224
40 !
17 1
!
Ripplebrook
Wasco County
!
DISTRICT LOCATION
1 2A 3 4 5 7 8 11 10 14 2B 2C 9 12 13
!
DISTRICT 2C
Eagle Creek
171
30
!
26
02 6
40
Zigzag
026
! !
Maywood Park
2 00
30
20 Multnomah Falls
281
90
80
70
35
35
!
2 00
Dodson
10!
1 28
Odell
282
1 08
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
1 02C OR 211 1 02C OR 211 1 02C OR 211 1 02C OR 211 1 02C OR 211 1 02C OR 211 1 02C OR 211 1 02C OR 211 1 02C OR 211 1 02C OR 224 1 02C OR 224 1 02C OR 224 1 02C OR 224 1 02C OR 224 1 02C OR 224 1 02C OR 224 1 02C OR 224 1 02C OR 224 1 02C OR 224 1 02C OR 224 1 02C OR 224 1 02C OR 224 1 02C OR 211 1 02C OR 173
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
1 02C OR 173 1 02C OR 212 1 02C OR 212 1 02C OR 212 1 02C OR 212 1 02C OR 212 1 02C OR 212 1 02C OR 281 1 02C OR 281 1 02C OR 281 1 02C OR 281 1 02C OR 281 1 02C OR 281 1 02C OR 281 1 02C OR 281 1 02C OR 281 1 02C OR 282 1 02C OR 282
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
(
!
! !
(
!
04 7
!
102
068
0 09 61 1
04 7
123
!!
Maywood Park
(
! ! ! !
029
140
7 03
( !
2 14
142 (
Beaverton 040
! ! ! !
( Sylvan
064 064
Portland !
(( Wood Village
! ! ! ! ! !
12 0 091
Dodson
! Falls 00 Multnomah 1 ! !
081
2 09
Multnomah County
6 061 02
144
Tigard
003
! (
Milwaukie
(
Happy Valley
(
!
47
!
Carlton (
47
240
091
10 !
150
03 0
0 189 !
091
Rickreall
!
Falls City
(
!
51
191
5
!
Aumsville
(
Sublimity
162
Stayton(
! ! ! !
18 0
Lincoln County
(
!
Scio
( !
Adair Village
Millersburg
(
! ! Albany !
033
!
! !
( !
211 Crabtree
03 1
Blodgett
7 02
Philomath
!(
! (
Corvallis
(
! ! Tangent !
210
(
Benton County
!
Lebanon
Waterloo
058
Alsea
! ! ! ! ( !
201
4
Monroe
( !
215
200
5
Harrisburg
(
! !
10 14
!
001
01 5
10
8
(
! ! ! !
11
Lane County
! !
! !
(
!
! ! ! \\s6000e\giswork\GIS23_53_Pavement_standard_and_related_maps\Pavement_Condition_2010\mxd\D3_Pave.mxd ! ! !
Halsey 212 ( 9 2C
Brownsville
12
13!
Sweet!Home
Cascadia
! ! ! !
20
126
70
60
!
1 2A
2B
164 (
Jefferson
001
250 !
!
Turner
Polk County
Dallas
193
60
22
16 0
99W
20 ! ( 0 20 3 0 !! 0 SALEM
00
! ! ! !
Willamina
50
221
0 ! 260 ! ! ! ! Keizer
2 07
(
Brooks
40
Silverton 50
!
Mount( Angel
40 !
99E 22
!
10 !
10 !
163
20 !
214
20 !
!
Valley Junction
30!
157
03 2
Sheridan
0 153 !
Amity !
153 !
10
270 !
99E
(
10
Gervais
40
091
03 9
160
154
08 1
00 1
18
40
5 15
Woodburn
219
30
051
McMinnville
091
Dayton
(
50
30 ! !( 0 0 ! !
154
14 0
40 !
Lafayette
Dundee
10
(
! (
20
Newberg
20!
99W
St. Paul
99W
Yamhill 0! (
151
219
02 9
00 9
30
141
Lake Oswego ! Damascus ! 174 ! King City Durham ( Johnson City Clackamas ( ( ( ( Sandy Tualatin ! ! ( ( ! 2 (! 17 Rivergrove ( ! Linn ! West ! ! Sherwood ( Eagle Creek ( ( Oregon City !
(
1 08
Wilsonville
(
Donald
(
280 !
! !
0 ! 30 ( ! 40 !
!
Hubbard
211
141
0
( Barlow
Estacada Canby !
(
DISTRICT 3
!
Zigzag Rhododendron
171
Aurora
(
!
Clackamas County
(
Molalla
(
!
161
10
! !
MAP LEGEND
053
!
213
20
U.S. Route
30
Silver Cr. Falls
3 15
! !
Mehama
(
Mill City 30
! (
Gates
(
40
22
50 (
Detroit
(
Idanha
162!
60
! ! (
Jefferson County
!
70
(
!
(
!
Santiam 80 Junction !
6 01
016
80 !
126
! !
Miles
12
! !
PRODUCED BY ODOT - GIS UNIT (503) 986-3154 - FEBRUARY 2011 GIS No. 23-53
(!
! !
!!
I
!
DISCLAIMER: Deschutes County purposes only and may not have been This product is for informational prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Users of this information should review or consult the primary data and information sources to ascertain the usability of the information.
! !
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
9 00
(
! ! ! ! !
( (
!
Yamhill County
!
101
(
Lincoln City
101
(
120 Kernville ! ! 0 10
!
009
091
130! 130
229
181
Otter Rock
20
191
20 !
001
Newport !0 ! ( 140
30
(
Toledo
20
Eddyville
180
10180
!
033 30
!
! (
Philomath
! 90
Tangent
(
!
10
34
091
009
160
!
201
05 8
Populated Place County Boundary Hydro Feature District Office Interstate Route
! !
MAP LEGEND
30!
Harrisburg
*
!
(
! ! !
U.S. Route
(
( !
\\s6000e\giswork\GIS23_53_Pavement_standard_and_related_maps\Pavement_Condition_2010\mxd\D4_Pave.mxd
Yachats (
501
100 Monroe ( !
99E
5
!
210
!
(
! !
! ! ! !
! !( ! ! ! !( ! !
! ! !
101
001
34
058
! (
Waldport
Sodaville 220
212
10 !
027
Alsea
! !
20
30
40 0
99W
Halsey ( !
0 !
20
Brownsville 10
228
50 !
20
Corvallis ( ! 0
34
20
Blodgett
40
031
30!
80
20
Albany
10
!
Millersburg
016
! !
Crabtree 0
!
99E
5
!
10 210
230
10 Lebanon Waterloo
! !
34
01 6
10
20
Siletz
Depoe Bay
223
10
!
Otis
18
10
22
Neskowin 100
039
20
032
!
( (
! ! ! ! ! !
20
!
009
( !
Clackamas County
( (
DISTRICT LOCATION
1 2A 3 4 5 7 10 14 8 2B 2C 9 12 13
!!
Falls City 0
194
DISTRICT 4
Marion County
! !
194
! (
( ( (
!
(
!
11
(
99W
70
240!
!
164
(
Jefferson
20 ! 10 Scio
211
Mill City
! (
! !
Adair Village
( !
226
(
!
20
20
30 ! 20 Sweet Home
!
016
40
!
Cascadia
20
50
!
60
!
70
! !
0
!
Miles
160
PRODUCED BY ODOT - GIS UNIT (503) 986-3154 - FEBRUARY 2011 GIS No. 23-53
I
!
DISCLAIMER: This product is for informational purposes only and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Users of this information should review or consult the primary data and information sources to ascertain the usability of the information.
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
! ( !
Lincoln County
! !
! !
Benton County
201
! ! ! ! ! ! !
05 8
0
( !
Linn County
Harrisburg
(
! !
001
200
180
Florence ( ! 190
009
10
!
20062
!
30
200
Dunes City
30
Creswell ( 222
226
!
200
001
10!
180
40
Cottage Grove
99
(
Gardiner
! !( !
Reedsport
170
Scottsburg !
!
County Boundary Hydro Feature District Office Interstate Route Allegany U.S. Route 241 Oregon Route 0 4 9 Coos Highway County Number Pavement Conditions
231
Populated Place
Elkton
( !
! !
Yoncalla
(
!
*
!
00 1
! !
Douglas County
DISTRICT LOCATION
! !
Oakland
1 2A 3 4
2B 2C 9
12
13
!
5 7 8
10 14
( !
DISTRICT 5
!
! !
11
! !
\\s6000e\giswork\GIS23_53_Pavement_standard_and_related_maps\Pavement_Condition_2010\mxd\D5_Pave.mxd
MAP LEGEND
045
Anlauf
101
Mapleton
Swisshome
126
Noti
120
! ! ! !
Eugene
0!
! ! (
10 !
40
069 10
569
0!
0 ! Goshen !
190 !
!(
0 !
227
!
015
20
!
10
!
Springfield
222
10
(
Lowell
01 8
20
Deadwood
229
Greenleaf
!
20
40
!
99
36
30
!
Goldson
10 !
200
170
229
!
50
! !
215
Coburg
200
126
Vida
30 !
Blue River
McKenzie Bridge
40
!
50
215
!
015
1 09
222
!
30
Westfir ( Oakridge (
Deschutes County
40
58
50 60
Crescent Lake
9 42
! !
8 01
! ! !
Klamath County
Miles
PRODUCED BY ODOT - GIS UNIT (503) 986-3154 - FEBRUARY 2011 GIS No. 23-53
I
!
DISCLAIMER: This product is for informational purposes only and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Users of this information should review or consult the primary data and information sources to ascertain the usability of the information.
!
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
! !
( !
! ! !
! ! ! !
( !
!( ! !
!( !
! !
200
101
2 22
!
01 8
222
001 226
200
009
220
( !
Boswell Springs
( Lakeside
Yoncalla
009
! (
001
240
24 0
! !
101
!
42
10 Coquille
(
( !
Roseburg
260
24 4
10 !
009
280
Cape Blanco
25 0
290
101
!
10
Powers
Riddle
001
542
50 !
Sixes
230
310
1 2A 3
001
320
260
4 5 7 8
(
!
10
! ! ! !!
060
022
11
!
272
Josephine County
350
255
350
360
Brookings 360
!
02 5
101
! !
\\s6000e\giswork\GIS23_53_Pavement_standard_and_related_maps\Pavement_Condition_2010\mxd\D7_Pave.mxd
Bandon
42
20 Myrtle Point 0 ! 30 42 ! !
!
035
60
!
Winston ( 70 Dillard
!
! !
120
42
Camas Valley
! !
110
(
Myrtle Creek
100 Canyonville (
90
5
!
Glendale
DISTRICT LOCATION
! !
2B 2C 9
12
13
14
!
Miles
10
! ( !
PRODUCED BY ODOT - GIS UNIT (503) 986-3154 - FEBRUARY 2011 ! GIS No. 23-53
038
I
!
DISCLAIMER: This product is for informational purposes only and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Users of this information should review or consult the primary data and information sources to ascertain the usability of the information.
250 !
0 Davis Slough
101
23 1
!
150 !
!
230
10
138
5
!
20 140 !
( Sutherlin
Oakland
001
Scottsburg
30!
0 Elkton
!
130!
5
045
20
10
Anlauf
5
! !
DISTRICT 7
!
( (
!
38
40 04
38
50
! (
Drain
160
Wilbur
10
138
20
!
Glide
! !
138
MAP LEGEND
(
Hydro Feature
! ! (
*
27
1
270
! !(
(
!
(
! ! !
063
(
Jackson County
(
!
04 9 ! !
(
06 3
255
! !
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
! ! ! ! !
! ! !
( !
( !
!( ! !
!( !
MAP LEGEND
(
(
!
! ! !
DISTRICT LOCATION
1 2A
( (
!
! !(
Hydro Feature
!
2B 2C 9 12 13
! ! ! ! (
*
!
District Office Interstate Route U.S. Route Oregon Route Highway Number
Very Good Good Fair Poor Very Poor
!
DISTRICT 8
3 4 5 7
10
!
( !
14
!
(
! !
8 11
! ! !
( (
!
049
! !
( !
! ! !
(
!
! ! !
0
!
Miles
!
12
PRODUCED BY ODOT - GIS UNIT (503) 986-3154 -FEBRUARY 2011 GIS No. 23-53
(
I
(
! !
10!
230
50 !
Wolf Creek
40
!
02 2
80!
5
! !
70
Trail
30
!
20 ( !
001
62
Shady Cove
! !
260
260
20
!
10
!
10
! !
40
99
0 !
!
0!
20 !
02 5
199
2 72 10
Provolt
Jacksonville
!
Central Point
(
(
! !
30 Medford
!
30
Oregon Caves
Siskiyou
273
! !
40 !
10
\\s6000e\giswork\GIS23_53_Pavement_standard_and_related_maps\Pavement_Condition_2010\mxd\D8_Pave.mxd
Cave Junction 0( ! 30 !
20
!
238
10 Phoenix
( (
Ruch
Talent
46
10
03 8
06 3
!
20
Ashland 0 6
(
3
! 10 !
50!
Rogue River
Gold Hill
10
60
234
10
271
!( White 10 ! City
Eagle Point
27 0
10
140
10
!
DISCLAIMER: This product is for informational purposes only and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Users of this information should review or consult the primary data and information sources to ascertain the usability of the information.
0!
62
60 02 2 !
Union Creek
Prospect
! !
! ! ! !
20
66
30 021
!
40
138
Pavement Conditions
Steamboat
!
30
40
138
50
60
70
!
80 90 138 !
!
233
20
138
100
(
!
! !
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
2B 2C 9 12 13
10 14
DISTRICT 9
Heppner Junction
150
84 30
052
! ! ! !
! ! ( !
002
Mosier
! ! (
70
60
!
84
Odell
!
The Dalles
!
20
!
005
Dufur
10
Moro
04 2
97
! 30
! 20
197
!
! 20
Grass Valley
!
004
! ! !
! (
! 40
005
! 80
26
! 90 ! !
10
!
MAP LEGEND
!
! ! !
049
Oregon Route
!
*
!
(
!
! (
(
!
\\s6000e\giswork\GIS23_53_Pavement_standard_and_related_maps\Pavement_Condition_2010\mxd\D9_Pave.mxd
10
216
Wapinitia
197
! 50
50 !
! 60
97
60
! (
Shaniko
Fossil
20
( !
40 !
218
Antelope
30
! !
DISCLAIMER: This product is for informational purposes only and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Users of this information should review or consult the primary data and information sources to ascertain the usability of the information.
26
042
20
04 4
Maupin
! 50
! 40
! 40
19
Miles
PRODUCED BY ODOT - GIS UNIT ! ! ( (503) 986-3154 - FEBRUARY 2011 GIS No. 23-53
Tygh Valley
0
!
10
!
30
216
20 ! 290
97
40
Condon
! !
90
Celilo Village
100
206 10
!
301
10
Wasco
( !0
!
206
10
!
20 !
! 20
30 0
! 30
30
19
! 10 !
30
70 80
! !
! !
97
Biggs Junction
! ! ( 110
Rufus
120
! !!
!! (
Blalock
130
Arlington
140
19
50!
206
004
291
053
10
I
!
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! !
! !
! (
(!
!
004
05 3
110
!
80
97
Metolius
36 1
!
90 ! 0( Madras
! !
Culver ( ! 10
! ! !
100
60 50!
20
(
90
6 01
004
97
26
Mitchell
10
360
1 04
! 110
Redmond
!
! !
Bend
! Mt. Bachelor 20
(
! !
! ! 20
20
014
!
372
140
! 10
004
10
00 7
30
150 !
! 20
97
30
!
! 40
40 Brothers
!
160 !
500
07
170! ! 0
(
La Pine
20
60
00 4
97
049
! !
70
180
! 10
58
Crescent
80
20
!
190 ! !
01 9
! 30
004
200 !
Chemult
210!
! !
97
220 !
004
!
004
Klamath County
DISTRICT LOCATION
!
1 2A
! ! !
2B 2C 9 12 13
4 5 7
! !
10 14
!
8 11
! ! ! !
DISCLAIMER: This product is for informational purposes only and may not ! have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Users of this information should review or consult the ! primary data and information sources to ascertain the usability of the information.
!
\\s6000e\giswork\GIS23_53_Pavement_standard_and_related_maps\Pavement_Condition_2010\mxd\D10_Pave.mxd
! 40
31
Silver Lake
!
50
! 60
70
80
90
!
Paisley
! 100
110
Miles
PRODUCED BY ODOT - GIS UNIT ! (503) 986-3154 - FEBRUARY 2011 GIS No. 23-53
130
10
20
00 4
Powell Butte
80 !
5 01
90 Sisters 0
!
!( !
242
100
126
100 015
!
370 10
!
20 Prineville 20 0! !
(
!
40 ! 30
!
26
041 10 126 !
10 20
! !
10 !
27
Post 38 0
30
380
40
!
Hampton 70 80
!
120 ! !
160
26
293
004
! 70
293
10
! !
0 Service Creek
207
! !
10 !
0 39
DISTRICT 10
! ! ! ! !
! ! (
70 !
!
80
!
041
26
90
(
! !
7 01
50
Paulina
(
!
! ! (
90
100
(
! !
MAP LEGEND
!
8 01
(
!
*
!
019
049
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
! !
! !
! !
DISTRICT LOCATION
1 2A
!
! !
2B 2C 9
!
12
13
!
3! 4
Populated Place County Boundary Hydro Feature District Office Interstate Route
MAP LEGEND
10!
20
Wagontire
!
30
5 7
10
!
*
!
14 8
! ! !
11
U.S. Route
!
40 !
395
50 ! Alkali Lake
Fort Klamath ! 90
62
004
97
!
230
240
60 !
70
(
Butte Falls
Chiloquin ! 250
(
80 !
97
20
!
270 30 !
! ! !
! ! ! !
21 66 50 0
280!
004
10
!
Bonanza
! 140
Keno
!
Midland
97
! !
Merrill
Miles
PRODUCED BY ODOT - GIS UNIT (503) 986-3154 - FEBRUARY 2011 GIS No. 23-53
\\s6000e\giswork\GIS23_53_Pavement_standard_and_related_maps\Pavement_Condition_2010\mxd\D11_Pave
290
10
39
20050
!
Malin
DISTRICT 11
0 ! 0
!(
80
020 90
!
Lakeview
150 !
395
020
Klamath Falls
20! 0 23 ! Dairy 0
60
30
140
270 !
70 0! 140 ! 10 20
!
019
40!
140
50
Beatty 40 !
90 ! 50 020
Bly
Valley Falls
Algoma
60
130
395
!
049
140
049
022
2 42
4 00
0 05
Adel
30 431
!
9 01
40
!
0 05
50
!
60
!
6 42
DISCLAIMER: This product is for informational purposes only and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Users of this information should review or consult the primary data and information sources to ascertain the usability of the information.
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
33 3
DISTRICT 12
160
!30
07 0
333
! ! !
180
!!
335
333
! !! (
74
20
10!
Ione 30
(
!
0 32
395
220 !
10 !
02 8
Lexington
80 40
2 05
Nye 20 !
Pilot Rock
! (
Heppner (
206
60
!
300
70
!
! ! ( !
Hardman
!
10
0 50!!
321
Lonerock
Ukiah
207
20
60!
( !
30
70 !
0
!
Kimberly
110
1 (2A 3 4 5 7 8
2B
! !
2C
12
!
13
10 14
11
\\s6000e\giswork\GIS23_53_Pavement_standard_and_related_maps\Pavement_Condition_2010\mxd\D12_Pave.mxd
DISTRICT LOCATION
19
120
DISCLAIMER: ! This product is for informational purposes only and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Users of this information should review or consult the primary data and information sources to ascertain the usability of the information.
Service Creek
70
!
19
005 0 80 !
90
!
Spray 40 !
(
19
100
! 005
10 402
!
Monument
402
80 !
02 8
60
005
395
0
20
Hamilton
30
!
(
!
MAP LEGEND
049
County Boundary
*
!
District Office
(
! ! ! (
(
!
80
207
028
052
50
60
70
74
! !
30
40
!
395
10 !
341
244
20
!
Oregon Route
Very Good Good
!
20!
10
30
!
200
207
320
Echo
!30
84
Pendleton
006
37
30 0
(
!
8 00
210
84
Stanfield
190
!
11
00 8
10 !
334
10
Adams
! ! 30
230
84
Meacham
!
240
I
Miles
(
!
PRODUCED ( BY ODOT - GIS UNIT (503) 986-3154 - FEBRUARY 2011 GIS No. 23-53
!
84
Boardman
170
!
006
10 ! !
82
10
Hermiston
05 4
002
170
730
2 00
Irrigon
Umatilla 180
Holdman
036
37
Helix
20
! !
0
036
! 0(
334
10
!
334
Athena
(
20 !
008
!
002
190
0!
730
200 10
Umapine
0 332
!
Milton-Freewater (! 30
339
054
5 33
Weston
(
330
204
10
!
331
052
6 00
!
250
10
005
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
Flora
!
! (
! !
(
!
Tollgate
20
!
20 !
! ! !
204
( !
!
30
Minam 0 10 Elgin
!!
! !
Summerville
(
!
Lostine
82
! !
Hilgard 0
!
006 260
! ! !!
30
! !
244
270
30
84
280 !
North Powder
40
Haines
84
!
30
!
Granite
! 4 Sumpter( 10
10
!
Baker City
50 ! 0 50
! ( !
1 2A 3 4
2B 2C 9
! !
12
13
!
5 7
!
10 14
! !
8 11
!
Miles
10
PRODUCED BY ODOT - GIS UNIT (503) 986-3154 - FEBRUARY 2011 GIS No. 23-53
DISCLAIMER: This product is for informational purposes only and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Users of this information should review or consult the primary data and information sources to ascertain the usability of the information.
\\s6000e\giswork\GIS23_53_Pavement_standard_and_related_maps\Pavement_Condition_2010\mxd\D13_Pave.mxd
DISTRICT LOCATION
(
30
!
071
7
071
310
40
!
Salisbury
30
84
3200
30 !
415
! !
Populated Place
! !
County Boundary
(
! !
Hydro Feature
U.S. Route
300
86
20
!
012 30
!
40 (
!
06
Durkee
!
330
MAP LEGEND
049
!
10
! 0(
Halfway
50
Richland
012
30
413
60
Oregon Route
290
6 00
1 34
10
203
! 0( !
30
40
0 La Grande
! (
! (
342
70 ! Joseph ( 0!
!
10 !
10
06 6
( Cove
Wallowa Lake
237
!
Union
20
20
066
10
0 34
20
203
Medical Springs
0 ! Cornucopia
10
Imbler
60
!
Enterprise
0 01
350
40
20
!
010
35 0
40 20
! ( !
30
40
!
Wallowa
!
50
82
DISTRICT 13
10
0 33
30
011
351
Imnaha
006
6 06
Copperfield Oxbow !
86
70
3 41
006
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
! ! !
(!
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! !
( !
!
! !(
! ! ( !
! ! ! (
! (
! ! ! ! ! ! !
I
!
Dayville
130 ! (
! 110
26 !
140
005
150
!
Mount Vernon
120 ! (
! 180
170
Canyon City
Prairie City
26
(
26
210 ! ! 0
Unity
220 !
Miles
18
!
20
260
Jamieson
270
84
! ! !
Seneca
! 30
451
240
!
!(
Vale 007
250
!
Ontario
260
370
Payette Junction ! 20 !
!
DISCLAIMER: This product is for informational purposes only and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Users of this information should review or consult the primary data and information sources to ascertain the usability of the information.
!
Harper
50
!
230
!
Nyssa Adrian !
450
10
007
(
! !
40 !
10
Cairo !
395
60! 160
!
Drewsey
170
!
007
180
!
220
Harper Jct.
200
DISTRICT LOCATION
! !
20
Juntura
190
210
( 0 ! ! 0
1 2A 3 4 5 7
2B
!
Riley 110
!
20 395
120
!
0 ! ! 130 ! ( 0 Hines (
Burns
140 10 20
!
150
Buchanan
!
20 !
2C
12
13
!
007
10
Lawen
Crane
! 30
10
!
! 20
14 8 11
!
Narrows
New Princeton
!
40
MAP LEGEND
!
Hydro Feature
! !
70 !
*
! !
456
! !
049
(
! ! ! 120
431
\\s6000e\giswork\GIS23_53_Pavement_standard_and_related_maps\Pavement_Condition_2010\mxd\D14_Pave.mxd
30 !
205
40
50 !
60
Frenchglen
Roaring Springs
! 80
DISTRICT 14
442
50
78
60
Folly Farm
70
Jordan Valley
30 80
!
5045
!
40
95
Burns Junction
90
60
Rome
! 70
Basque
95
! 90
! 100
! 110
PRODUCED BY ODOT - GIS UNIT (503) 986-3154 - FEBRUARY 2011 GIS No. 23-53
10
395
! 100
02
Austin Bates 0
! !
! 10
00
190
200
00
Greenhorn
071
! !
20
245
10
!
415
20
340
84
0!
230 Ironside
!
Huntington
005
!
00 6
( 10
!
240
350 !
250
!
26
Weiser
455 10!
52
360
30 !
048
44 0
10 !
20 ! (
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
REG: Region DIST: District ROUTE: Primary Route Designation RD ID: Road ID (ODOT State Hwy. Number) RW: Roadway ID 1 = Add Mileage; 2 = Non-Add Mileage; 3 = Split Add Mileage; 4 = Split Non-Add Mileage; 5 = Located Line
MT: Mileage Type Z = Overlap; Y = Spur; T = Temporary; C = Connector OV: Overlap Mileage Code (Used only for Z-segments) SURF: Surface Type AC = Asphalt Concrete; PC = Portland Cement Concrete; BW = Black and White; ST = Structure; G = Gravel
RATE D = Distress Survey METHOD: G = GFP Survey RUT INDX = Rut Index FAT INDX = Fatigue Index PAT INDX = Patch Index RAV INDX = Ravel Index ENV INDX = No Load Index
COND SCORE: Condition Score (0-100) RATING: Condition Rating VG = Very Good ST = Structure GD = Good UC = Under FR = Fair Construction PR = Poor NR = Not Rated VP = Very Poor
APPENDIX C 2009 and 2010 Mileage Treated Summary and Project Listing
This appendix lists paving and chip seal resurfacing projects completed in 2009 and 2010 under the construction program or through maintenance activities and summarizes mileage by treatment. These projects include new construction, overlay, and chip seal work. This list does not include blade patching or intermittent machine patching. The general criteria for including on the list were:
treatment is likely to provide 5 or more years of service in fair-or-better condition non-intermittent treatment over one-half mile in length (urban) or over 1 mile in length (rural), or for shorter lengths, the majority of a pavement management section is treated resulting in an improvement in the condition rating of the section
The 2010 treatment list was used to update pavement conditions to reflect improvements which may have been made to the highway system after the rating crews survey.
BY TREATMENT
SEAL COAT 0.0 13.2 52.2 32.5 176.8 274.7 RECONSTRUCT 0.0 5.5 3.2 6.9 0.6 16.2
TOTAL
MILES 42.5 116.9 193.3 135.3 200.7 688.6
RESURFACING
BY TREATMENT
RESURFACING 112.2 206.5 299.8 224.8 46.6 889.8 SEAL COAT 0.0 26.5 138.8 65.0 354.8 585.2 RECONSTRUCT 0.0 15.9 6.4 25.4 1.2 48.9
TOTAL
LANE MILES 112.2 248.9 445.0 315.2 402.6 1523.9
BY TREATMENT
SEAL COAT 0.0 39.0 6.7 131.3 227.4 404.5 RECONSTRUCT 2.4 2.4 0.0 0.0 18.2 23.0
TOTAL
MILES 81.9 143.1 44.0 181.4 293.7 744.2
RESURFACING
BY TREATMENT
RESURFACING 198.3 238.0 92.3 101.5 97.7 727.8 SEAL COAT 0.0 79.0 15.8 276.5 465.5 836.8 RECONSTRUCT 6.6 4.7 0.0 0.0 36.3 47.5
TOTAL
LANE MILES 204.9 321.7 108.0 378.1 599.5 1612.1
42.5 111.7
81.9 204.9
82.64 83.33 116.70 121.15 122.26 123.38 122.26 123.30 16.67 16.67 10.96 0.00 2.67 7.13 8.16 11.83 12.10 13.98 21.82 19.43 14.36 6.26 4.40 8.60 8.58 14.08 13.80 16.00
97.90 109.00 109.00 112.50 81.40 89.60 97.90 109.00 109.00 112.50 58.20 67.10 26.73 28.33 198.57 210.22 280.50 284.70 284.81 287.60 288.37 294.95 211.42 216.95 29.28 35.25 29.44 32.20 51.35 56.87 5.88 0.00 0.22 1.39 0.18 8.13 1.62 16.31 0.01 0.06 1.70 0.00 41.69 38.07 57.13 57.33 16.35 0.20 1.39 2.20 0.35 8.81 16.31 28.90 9.00 1.70 5.88 6.80
44.0 108.0
118.98 123.17 132.70 141.87 114.25 118.98 169.72 184.08 229.39 231.74 60.70 64.50 34.43 54.11 52.00 14.68 30.90 37.70 7.00 -1.97 9.50 17.20 60.30 16.30 37.00 41.40 8.30 -0.40 12.70 21.20
104.00 109.15
103.26 106.88 41.45 50.80 57.06 21.70 33.40 59.60 25.75 34.85
175.65 190.50 267.80 278.00 318.40 327.45 324.61 324.67 238.00 240.30 244.20 244.70 238.50 239.10 245.60 246.30 246.60 258.00 246.61 246.82 258.35 265.60 83.00 96.80 96.80 104.50 105.00 121.50 121.50 128.25 0.00 0.50 0.50 2.00 4.50 12.47 18.07 20.64 33.85 47.58 55.28 65.80 11.97 0.88 20.26 2.46 2.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.35 40.30 2.00 4.50 16.30 17.66 19.20 28.50 46.26 54.45 64.45 71.18 12.47 9.00 30.30 3.80 3.80 9.50 10.11 8.44 9.79 22.07 5.86 73.35
This appendix describes the process used to compute the Condition Index values that define the pavement condition rating for the section. The general equation format, coefficient and exponent for each distress, and example calculations are included.
COMPUTATION OF CONDITION INDICES This procedure, which determines an overall condition index and a corresponding pavement condition rating, was first utilized in the 1993 report. In 1994, a slight modification was made for the index calculations where more than one severity level existed for a given distress. This procedure is still in use today and uses data from the Distress Survey procedure to determine 0 to 100 index values for the distress types considered most important for determining the overall condition of the pavement. Six condition index values are determined: a rut index, a raveling index, a patching index, a fatigue index, a no load (environmental) index, and an overall index. The index values are a function of distress type, distress severity, and distress quantity present in the pavement surface. Larger index values indicate better pavement conditions. For example, a new pavement with no distress is assigned an index value of 100. The six condition indexes are combined together to determine an overall index which is used to categorize the condition of the pavement section as good, fair, poor, etc. Highways rated in accordance with the Distress Survey procedure are broken into small sampling segments (standard length of 0.1 mile) for collection of the distress data. A 100% sampling rate is collected, except where the 0.1 mile segments cannot be rated, typically on bridges or due to construction or safety issues. Index values are determined for each 0.1 mile segment, then all 0.1 mile segments falling within the beginning and ending boundaries of a pavement management section are aggregated together to determine the index values to be reported for the section. Determination of 0.1 mile Indices Pavement distresses collected for each 0.1 mile segment are categorized by distress type (fatigue cracking, transverse cracking, longitudinal cracking, etc.), severity (low, moderate, or high) and quantity. An index factor which ranges from 0.0 to 1.0 is computed for each distress type at each severity level present using Equation (1) as follows:
Factor(typeX) (severityY) =1.00-A*(Measured Distress/Maximum Distress)B Equation (1)
The coefficient A and exponent B represent the relative impact of the type and severity of each distress. These values control the sensitivity of the index factor to the quantities of a given distress. Dividing the Measured Distress quantity by the Maximum Distress quantity possible generates a dimensionless value which ranges from zero (no distress measured) to one (measured distress is maximum possible). The Maximum Distress quantities which can occur in a standard 0.1 mile section have been established for each of the distress type (e.g., 1,000 LF max. per tenth-mile section for fatigue cracking). The coefficient A can range in value from 0.0 to 1.0 and establishes the maximum percentage deduction from 1.0 for a particular severity level and distress type relative to all the other severity levels and distress types. The exponent B also ranges in value from 0.0 to 1.0 and sets the curvature or slope of the equation, which controls the relative effect of quantity changes for a particular distress type. When B = 1.0, the equation generates a straight line with slope A, and the index factor is directly proportional to the quantity of measured distress. As B approaches 0
the equation becomes highly non-linear and very small quantities of distress generate increasingly larger percentage deducts. There are some distresses for each pavement type that are rated for severity only (low, moderate, or high) without measuring the quantity of distress. For these distresses, the B coefficient in equation 1 above is always equal to 1. These distresses are as follows: Pavement Type A, C and J A C and J C and J C J Distress Rutting Bleeding Lane Joint Condition Shoulder Joint Condition Transverse Cracking Transverse Joint Condition
The coefficients, exponents, and maximum values for the various distress types are presented in Tables D-1 through D-3. Most of the distress types have three levels of severity: low, moderate, and high. The total measured quantity of all three severity levels for a particular distress type cannot exceed the maximum value listed in Tables D-1, D-2, and D-3. (e.g., Fatigue(low) + Fatigue (mod) + Fatigue(high) <=1000 LF). For 2010, some of the distress coefficients were adjusted to better accommodate the data available from the move to semi-automated data collection methods. There is an exception to the above calculation for low severity fatigue distress on asphalt surfaced pavements. When the quantity of low severity fatigue cracking is less than or equal to 25 feet, the index factor stays equal to 1.0. For quantity greater than 25 feet, the index factor is calculated using the A coefficient and B exponent as normal. After computing index factors for each distress severity and distress type using Equation (1), a composite index factor is calculated for each distress type by using Equation (2). This equation calculates the weighed average of the index factors for each severity within a given distress type based on measured quantities for severity. Determination of this weighted average is a modification made to the 1993 condition index calculation procedure.
Factor(typeX)=[( factor(typeX) (sev.1) *quan. (sev.1) )+( factor(typeX) (sev2) *quan.
(sev.3) )] (sev.2) )+(factor(typeX) (sev.3) *quan.
Equation (2)
The index factors from equations 1 and 2 are multiplied by 100 to determine the rut index, fatigue index, patching index, and overall index for all pavement types. For asphalt pavements, the raveling index and no load (environmental) index are also calculated. Table D-4 shows how the index factors for each distress are used in the calculation of the condition indices. These calculations are for each 0.1 mile segment. Note that the overall index is unique. First, a non-rut index is determined which multiplies all index factors other than rut together and then this value is compared to the rut index. Whichever is lower becomes the overall condition index for the 0.1 mile segment.
The index calculating algorithm utilizing Equations (1) and (2) provides a very flexible model for converting multiple distress types with quantities into a single dimensionless index value. The following examples demonstrate the calculation of the overall condition index for a given 0.1 mile segment. Example 1 shows where distress other than rut controls the overall index. Example 2 shows where rut controls the overall index. Example 1 (non-rut determines overall index): The field data for an asphalt concrete section from MP 37.8 to MP 37.9 indicates the following distress: 300 linear feet of low severity fatigue cracking, 500 linear feet of moderate severity fatigue cracking, and eight (8) low severity transverse cracks. The rut severity is low (between and ) . Using Equations (1) and (2) and the appropriate coefficients and exponents from Table D-1, the overall index is computed for the given tenth-mile section as follows: First, using Equation (1), calculate the index factor for each severity level for each distress type reported in the 0.1 mile segment:
Factor (fatigue) (low) Factor (fatigue) (moderate) Factor (transverse) (low) Factor (rutting) (low) =1.00-0.6*(300/1,000)0.1 =1.00-0.8*(500/1,000)0.1 =1.00-0.33*(8/44)0.5 =1.00-0.05*(1/1)1 = 0.468 = 0.254 = 0.859 = 0.950
Since no other detrimental conditions exist, the value for all other indices will be equal to 1.00 as shown in the following example:
Factor (patching) (low) =1.00-0.55*(0/6000)0.1 = 1.00-0.55*0.0 = 1.00
Second, with two severity levels measured for fatigue cracking, calculate the composite fatigue factor using Equation (2):
Factor (fatigue) =[(0.47*300)+(0.25*500)]/(300+500) = 0.333
Third, using the equations in Table D-4, determine the six condition indices. For the overall index, multiply each index factor together, excluding the rut index, to determine the non-rut index for the 0.1 mile segment. This non-rut index is compared to rut index and the lower of the two values, multiplied by 100, is the overall condition index for the 0.1 mile segment.
Rut index Fatigue index Patching index Raveling index No Load index Non-rut index =(1.00-0.05)*100 = 0.333*100 = 1.00*100 = 1.00*100 = 0.859*100 = 95.0 = 33.3 = 100 = 100 = 85.9 = 0.333*0.859*100 = 28.6
= Factor(fatigue)*Factor(transverse)*100
The non-rut index is lower than the rut index, therefore: Overall Index = 28.6
Example 2 (rut determines overall index): The field data for an asphalt concrete section from MP 37.9 to MP 38.0 indicates the following distress: 100 linear feet of low severity fatigue cracking, 50 linear feet of moderate severity fatigue cracking, and six (6) low severity transverse cracks. The rut severity is high (> ). Using Equations (1) and (2) and the appropriate coefficients and exponents from Table D-1, the overall index is computed for the given tenth-mile section as follows: First, using Equation (1), calculate the index factor for each severity level for each distress type reported in the 0.1 mile segment:
Factor (fatigue) (low) Factor (fatigue) (moderate) Factor (transverse) (low) Factor (rutting) (low) =1.00-0.6*(100/1,000)0.1 =1.00-0.8*(50/1,000)0.1 =1.00-0.33*(6/44)0.5 =1.00-0.70*(1/1)1 = 0.523 = 0.407 = 0.877 = 0.300
Second, with two severity levels measured for fatigue cracking, calculate the composite fatigue factor using Equation (2):
Factor (fatigue) =[(0.523*100)+(0.407*50)]/(100+50) = 0.484
Third, using the equations in Table D-4, determine the six condition indices.
Rut index Fatigue index Patching index Raveling index No Load index Non-rut index =(1.00-0.70)*100 = 0.484*100 = 1.00*100 = 1.00*100 = 0.877*100 = 30.0 = 48.4 = 100 = 100 = 87.7 = 0.484*0.877*100 = 42.4
= Factor(fatigue)*Factor(transverse)*100
The rut index is lower than the non-rut index, therefore: Overall Index = 30.0
Aggregating 0.1 mile Indices to Pavement Management Section The condition indices for the 0.1 mile segments are combined together to calculate the condition indices for each Pavement Management Sections. All 0.1 mile segments falling within the beginning and ending boundaries of a Pavement Management Section are averaged together to determine the index values to be reported for the section. The following example demonstrates the calculation of the overall index for a given Pavement Management Section. Example 3 (overall index of pavement management section: Assume the two 0.1 mile segments from the above examples are contained in a Pavement Management Section from MP 37.5 to MP 38.0. There are no distresses for the other 0.1 mile sections contained in the Pavement Management Section. Therefore the overall index for the Pavement Management Section would be calculated as follows:
Overall Index for Pavement Management Section = (Overall Index first 0.1 mile section + Overall Index second 0.1 mile section + Overall Index nth 0.1 mile section)/n. With MP37.5 MP 37.6 Overall Index = 100 (No distress) MP37.6 MP 37.7 Overall Index = 100 (No distress) MP37.7 MP 37.8 Overall Index = 100 (No distress) MP37.8 MP 37.9 Overall Index = 28.6 (Example 1 non-rut index determines overall index) MP37.9 MP 38.0 Overall Index = 30.0 (Example 2 rut index determines overall index) Then the Overall Index for this Pavement Management Section is calculated as follows: (100 + 100 + 100 + 28.6 + 30.0)/5 = 71.7 (This Pavement Management Section would be rated as fair)
Note that this example was designed to illustrate how the overall index is determined. Typically it is unusual to find a Pavement Management Section with such a severe difference between 0.1 mile sections.
OVERALL
J J J
OVERALL
C C C
OVERALL