Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2K views

    1-Javellana V Dilg Digest

    Uploaded by

    Frederick Barillo
    This case involves a city councilor named Erwin B. Javellana who was practicing law while holding public office, which an administrative circular prohibited without authorization. An engineer filed a complaint against Javellana for violating this circular. Javellana argued the circular was unconstitutional as the Supreme Court solely regulates the practice of law. The Supreme Court ruled the circular and local government code did not infringe on its authority, but simply aimed to prevent conflicts of interest for public officials allowing private professions only if it did not interfere with official duties. The code was also found not to discriminate against any profession.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    1-Javellana V Dilg Digest

    Uploaded by

    Frederick Barillo
    2K views2 pages
    This case involves a city councilor named Erwin B. Javellana who was practicing law while holding public office, which an administrative circular prohibited without authorization. An engineer filed a complaint against Javellana for violating this circular. Javellana argued the circular was unconstitutional as the Supreme Court solely regulates the practice of law. The Supreme Court ruled the circular and local government code did not infringe on its authority, but simply aimed to prevent conflicts of interest for public officials allowing private professions only if it did not interfere with official duties. The code was also found not to discriminate against any profession.

    Original Description:

    1-javellana v dilg digest.docx

    Original Title

    1-javellana v dilg digest.docx

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This case involves a city councilor named Erwin B. Javellana who was practicing law while holding public office, which an administrative circular prohibited without authorization. An engineer filed a complaint against Javellana for violating this circular. Javellana argued the circular was unconstitutional as the Supreme Court solely regulates the practice of law. The Supreme Court ruled the circular and local government code did not infringe on its authority, but simply aimed to prevent conflicts of interest for public officials allowing private professions only if it did not interfere with official duties. The code was also found not to discriminate against any profession.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    2K views2 pages

    1-Javellana V Dilg Digest

    Uploaded by

    Frederick Barillo
    This case involves a city councilor named Erwin B. Javellana who was practicing law while holding public office, which an administrative circular prohibited without authorization. An engineer filed a complaint against Javellana for violating this circular. Javellana argued the circular was unconstitutional as the Supreme Court solely regulates the practice of law. The Supreme Court ruled the circular and local government code did not infringe on its authority, but simply aimed to prevent conflicts of interest for public officials allowing private professions only if it did not interfere with official duties. The code was also found not to discriminate against any profession.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    9. Javellana vs.

    DILG Facts: This petition for review on certiorari involves the right of a public official to engage inthe practice of his profession while employed in the Government. Attorney Erwin B. Javellanawas an elected City Councilor of Bago City, Negros Occidental. City Engineer Ernesto C.Divinagracia filed Administrative Case No. C-10-90 against Javellana for: (1) violation of Department of Local Government (DLG) Memorandum Circular No. 80-38 dated June 10, 1980in relation to DLG Memorandum Circular No. 74-58 and of Section 7, paragraph b, No. 2 of Republic Act No. 6713, otherwise known as the "Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees," and (2) for oppression, misconduct and abuse of authority.Divinagracia's complaint alleged that Javellana, an incumbent member of the City Council or Sanggunian Panglungsod of Bago City, and a lawyer by profession, has continuously engaged inthe practice of law without securing authority for that purpose from the Regional Director,Department of Local Government, as required by DLG Memorandum Circular No. 80-38 inrelation to DLG Memorandum Circular No. 74-58 of the same department.On the other hand, Javellana filed a Motion to Dismiss the administrative case againsthim on the ground mainly that DLG Memorandum Circulars Nos. 80-38 and 90-81 areunconstitutional because the Supreme Court has the sole and exclusive authority to regulate the practice of law Held: Petitioner's contention that Section 90 of the Local Government Code of 1991 and DLGMemorandum Circular No. 90-81 violate Article VIII, Section 5 of the Constitution iscompletely off tangent. Neither the statute nor the circular trenches upon the Supreme Court's power and authority to prescribe rules on the practice of law. The Local Government Code andDLG Memorandum Circular No. 90-81 simply prescribe rules of conduct for public officials toavoid conflicts of

    interest between the discharge of their public duties and the private practice of their profession, in those instances where the law allows it.Section 90 of the Local Government Code does not discriminate against lawyers anddoctors. It applies to all provincial and municipal officials in the professions or engaged in anyoccupation. Section 90 explicitly provides that sanggunian members "may practice their professions, engage in any occupation, or teach in schools expect during session hours." If thereare some prohibitions that apply particularly to lawyers, it is because of all the professions, the practice of law is more likely than others to relate to, or affect, the area of public service

    You might also like