Digest

G.R. No. 168557 February 16, 2007 FELS ENERGY, INC., Petitioner, vs.
THE PROVINCE OF BATANGAS and THE OFFICE OF THE PROVINCIAL ASSESSOR OF BATANGAS, Respondents. x----------------------------------------------------x G.R. No. 170628 February 16, 2007 NATIONAL POWER CORPORATION, Petitioner, vs. LOCAL BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS OF BATANGAS, LAURO C. ANDAYA, in his capacity as the Assessor of the Province of Batangas, and the PROVINCE OF BATANGAS represented by its Provincial Assessor, Respondents.
FACTS: 1. NPC entered into a lease contract with Polar Energy, Inc. over 3x30 MW diesel engine power barges moored at Balayan Bay in Calaca, Batangas. The contract, denominated as an Energy Conversion Agreement5 (Agreement), was for a period of five years. 2. Article 10 reads: NAPOCOR shall be responsible for the payment of (a) all taxes, import duties, fees, charges and other levies imposed by the National Government of the Republic of the Philippines or any agency or instrumentality thereof (b) all real estate taxes and assessments, rates and other charges in respect of the Power Barges.6 3. Subsequently, Polar Energy, Inc. assigned its rights under the Agreement to FELS. FELS received an assessment of real property taxes on the power barges from Provincial Assessor of Batangas City. 4. FELS referred the matter to NPC, reminding it of its obligation under the Agreement to pay all real estate taxes. 5. NPC sought reconsideration of the Provincial Assessors,which motion was denied.Hence, NPC filed a petition with the Local Board of Assessment Appeals (LBAA) for the setting aside of the assessment and the declaration of the barges as non-taxable items; LBAA ruling: the owner of the bargesFELS, a private corporationis the one being taxed, not NPC. A mere agreement making NPC responsible for the payment of all real estate taxes and assessments will not justify the exemption of FELS; such a privilege can only be granted to NPC and cannot be extended to FELS. 6. Aggrieved, FELS appealed the LBAAs ruling to the Central Board of Assessment Appeals (CBAA). CBAA ruling: Initiall, it ruled that the power barges exempt from real property tax. The CBAA reasoned that the power barges belong to NPC; since they are actually, directly and exclusively used by it, the power barges are covered by the exemptions In a complete volte face, the CBAA issued a Resolution reversing its earlier decision. Affirming the real property tax assessment on FELS. 7. FELS filed a petition for review before the CA CA ruling: Denied or lack of merit. Affirmed the assessment. Petition filed out of time. Issues: 1. WON, petition was filed out of time. YES. 2. Whether power barges, which are floating and movable, are personal properties and therefore, not subject to real property tax. THEY ARE REAL PROPERTY. 3. If power barges are real properties, whether they are exempt from real estate tax under Section 234 of the Local Government Code (LGC) being used by NPC. NO.
HELD: Petitioners contentions are bereft of merit.
1. Petition was filed out of time. Section 226 of R.A. No. 7160, otherwise known as the Local Government Code of 1991, provides: SECTION 226. LBAA - Any owner or person having legal interest in the property who is not satisfied with the action of the provincial, city or municipal assessor may, within sixty (60) days from the date of receipt of the written notice of assessment, appeal to the Board of Assessment Appeals of the province or city. Instead of appealing to the Board of Assessment Appeals (as stated in the notice), NPC opted to file a motion for reconsideration of the Provincial Assessors decision, a remedy not sanctioned by law. The remedy of appeal to the LBAA is available from an adverse ruling or action of the provincial, city or municipal assessor in the assessment of the property. It follows then that the determination made by the respondent Provincial Assessor with regard to the taxability of the subject real properties falls within its power to assess properties for taxation purposes subject to appeal before the LBAA.33 2. Power barges are real property. Power barges are real property and are thus subject to real property tax Article 415 (9) of the New Civil Code provides that "[d]ocks and structures which, though floating, are intended by their nature and object to remain at a fixed place on a river, lake, or coast" are considered immovable property. Thus, power barges are categorized as immovable property by destination, being in the nature of machinery and other implements intended by the owner for an industry or work which may be carried on in a building or on a piece of land and which tend directly to meet the needs of said industry or work.51 3. They are not exempt even if used exclusively by NPC. We affirm the findings of the LBAA and CBAA that the owner of the taxable properties is petitioner FELS, which in fine, is the entity being taxed by the local government. As stipulated under Section 2.11, Article 2 of the Agreement: OWNERSHIP OF POWER BARGES. POLAR shall own the Power Barges and all the fixtures, fittings, machinery and equipment on the Site used in connection with the Power Barges which have been supplied by it at its own cost. POLAR shall operate, manage and maintain the Power Barges for the purpose of converting Fuel of NAPOCOR into electricity.52 It follows then that FELS cannot escape liability from the payment of realty taxes by invoking its exemption in Section 234 (c) of R.A. No. 7160, which reads: WHEREFORE, the Petitions are DENIED and the assailed Decisions and Resolutions AFFIRMED.

Digest

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Digest

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Digest

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

G.R. No. 168557 February 16, 2007 FELS ENERGY, INC., Petitioner, vs.

HELD: Petitioners contentions are bereft of merit.

You might also like