Reservoir Pressure: Oriented Perforation (Stress/Strain) + Reservoir Rock Type Identification (FZI)
Reservoir Pressure: Oriented Perforation (Stress/Strain) + Reservoir Rock Type Identification (FZI)
B o 30 t t o25 n
Interval with more potential to reduce gas production and decrease production problems in shale reservoirs: Rock type window
20 H
o l 15 e
P r e s s u r e
Production potential
10 5 0 0 1
Reservoir Pressure
2 3 4 5
Project Objective: to propose a methodology to optimize production thought oriented rock type perforation
Rock Strength
Reservoir Pressure
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
B Y x
B y
Shale
sand
Smart well candidate
B
A
B
A x
C B
Review of offshore Exploration & development plans Technological Risk analysis To extrapolate exploration geology risk analysis techniques to evaluate production technologies potential application Identify variables (technology & reservoir types scenarios) that will have technical/economical impact in their development plans
Technology A Technology B
Technology C
scena. 1
scena. 2
High Risk
scena. 3
Multilateral Wells
100000
MULTILATERAL DRILLING
1,866
10000
RESERVES (MMBOE) 100%:11.1 CAPEX (MM$):35.2 DCFROI (%):24 F & D COST ($/BOE):3.15
BOPDB OPD
1000
MCFPD
100
We may instrumented the reservoir using its truly shape and heterogeneities. Operators may build their own particular static model It can be used to simulate 4D (Drilling Simulator) and dynamic process
Reservoir
Smart Assets Value Evaluation tool - Geological surprises evaluation using Monte Carlo simulation
Water breakout (SM) Surprise handling (FN) assessment
Injector
Drilling cost Simple gasfront moveme nt model SIP 2.4 Simple waterfr ont moveme nt model LWD information SIP 2.4 Completion cost
Producer
Decision variables
Injector Injection points Valves/chokes Zonal flow sensors Producer Drainage point Valves/chokes producer Permanent resistivity sensors
Assumptions Variability
Interwell data Distance between wells Completed interval Perforation rock types rock wettability rock strenght pore pressure barriers layers Surprise handling Water Breakout
internal barriers
Uncertainty
-1
-0.5
0.5
Forecast
Clean Technologies will be rewarded with subsidies and tax allowances, main goal: zero discharge of solids To reduce water production to 50% with new technology Tools to measure, control and monitor environmental impact OSPAR (Oslo-Paris environmental legislation): Improvement in each cycle of Offshore technology management ( avoidance, reduction, re-use, recycling, recovery, residue disposal) Waste management SFT (Norwegian Pollution Control Authority): Prioritisation or substitution of hazardous substances Better quality control of local spills, reduce contamination of estuaries and artic zones
Production Geology Approach applied to Environmental Risk Assessment Reduction of Number of Wells
Review of technological options and development plans to reduce the environmental impact of Production /injection management Water / Gas Handling Zero Discharge Policy Improvement in the technology Management Life cycle ( avoidance, reduction, re-use, recycling, recovery, disposal)
North Sea ,UK (Pressure maintenance, oil rims, drainage optimization, contact movement monitoring, water/gas coning, hydrates) Improvement drainage strategies, gas development, L/V pressure distribution and transmissibility,WAG, deeper waters, water/gas coning,sand control) North and Norwegian Sea, Norway
Mutilayer with pressure differential CANADA Fractured reservoir,ITALY Deepwater Development plans, BRAZIL Heavy oil underlying by strong aquifers Oman GOM Improve productivity in Salt tectonic Hidrates, Ultradeep water development
Deepwater plans GUINEA
Production Geology Approach Technical/Economical Ranking matrix (Technology vs. Reservoir/Geology Scenarios)