Scan M.

DeCamillo is Manager of
Research and Development for
Kingsbury, Inc., in Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania. He is responsible for
design, analysis, and development of
Kingsbury fluid film bearings for
worldwide industrial and military
applications. He began work in this
field in 1975 and has since provided
engineering support to industry
regarding application and performance of hydrodynamic
bearings. Mr. DeCamillo has developed performance and
structural bearing analysis tools during his career, establishing
design criteria used in many publications and specifications.
He has patents and has authored several papers on
bearing research, which is currently focused on advancing
hydrodynamic bearing technology in high-speed turbomachinery.
Mr. DeCamillo received his B.S. degree (Mechanical
Engineering, 1975) from Drexel University. He is a registered
Professional Engineer in the State of Pennsylvania and a member
of STLE, ASME, and the Vibration Institute.
Minhui He is a Machinery Specialist
with BRG Machinery Consulting LLC, in
Charlottesville, Virginia. His responsibilities
include vibration troubleshooting, rotor-
dynamic analysis, as well as bearing and
seal analysis and design. He is a member of
STLE, and is also conducting research on
rotordynamics and hydrodynamic bearings.
Dr. He received his B.S. degree
(Chemical Machinery Engineering,
1994) from Sichuan University. From 1996 to 2003, he
conducted research on fluid film journal bearings in
the ROMAC Laboratories at the University of Virginia,
receiving his Ph. D. (Mechanical and Aerospace
Engineering, 2003).
C. Hunter Cloud is President of BRG
Machinery Consulting, LLC, in
Charlottesville, Virginia, a company
providing a full range of rotating
machinery technical services. He began his
career with Mobil Research and
Development Corporation in Princeton, NJ,
as a turbomachinery specialist responsible
for application engineering, commissioning,
and troubleshooting for production,
refining, and chemical facilities. During his 11 years at Mobil, he
worked on numerous projects, including several offshore gas
injection platforms in Nigeria, as well as serving as reliability
manager at a large US refinery.
Dr. Cloud received his B.S. (Mechanical Engineering, 1991) and
Ph.D. (Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, 2007) from the
University of Virginia. He is a member of ASME, the Vibration
Institute, and the API 684 rotordynamics task force.
James M. Byrne is currently a member of
the BRG Machinery Consulting team, in
Charlottesville, Virginia. BRG performs
research and analysis in the fields of fluid
film bearings, magnetic bearings, and
rotordynamics. Mr. Byrne began his career
designing internally geared centrifugal
compressors for Carrier in Syracuse, New
York. He continued his career at Pratt and
Whitney aircraft engines and became a
technical leader for rotordynamics. Later Mr. Byrne became a
program manager for Pratt and Whitney Power Systems managing
the development of new gas turbine products. From 2001 to 2007,
he was President of Rotating Machinery Technology, a manufacturer
of tilting pad bearings.
Mr. Byrne holds a BSME degree from Syracuse University, an
MSME degree from the University of Virginia, and an MBA from
Carnegie Mellon University.
JOURNAL BEARINGVIBRATIONAND SSV HASH
by
Scan M. DeCamillo
Manager, Research and Development
Kingsbury, Inc.
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Minhui He
Machinery Specialist
C. Hunter Cloud
President
and
James M. Byrne
Machinery Consultant
BRG Machinery Consulting, LLC
Charlottesville, Virginia 22903 USA
11
Table of Contents
ABSTRACT
Peculiar, low-frequency, radial vibrations have been observed in
various turbomachinery using tilt-pad journal bearings. Unlike
discrete subsynchronous spikes that often indicate a serious
problem, the vibrations are indiscrete and of low frequency and
amplitude. The low level shaft indications have raised concern in
witness tests of critical machinery, even in cases that comply with
American Petroleum Institute (API) limits, owing to uncertainty
regarding the cause and nature of the vibrations.
This paper presents shaft and pad vibration data from various
tilt-pad journal bearing tests that were undertaken to investigate and
better understand these subsynchronous indications. The vibration
characteristics are defined and compared under the influence of
speed, load, oil flow, and bearing orientation. Results are presented
for conventional and direct lube tilt-pad bearing designs, along with
discussions of parameters and methods that were successful in
reducing and eliminating these low level vibrations.
The test results indicate that the low-frequency shaft indications
are caused by pad vibration. Hypotheses and analyses are
presented and discussed in relation to the test observations.
INTRODUCTION
Many early technical papers report on the inherent stability of
tilt-pad journal bearings in overcoming oil whirl and oil whip
limitations of fixed geometry bearings. There are, however, other
vibration phenomena associated with tilt-pad bearings that are
topics of past and present research. In the late 70s, extensive
babbitt fatigue cracking of upper, unloaded pads was a major
problem in large, conventional tilt-pad journal bearings. These
were flooded designs, which incorporate end seals to restrict oil
outlet and flood the bearing cavity. A well-referenced study by
Adams and Payandeh (1983) attributes the damage to self-excited,
subsynchronous pad vibration.
Trends for larger and higher speed turbomachinery impose
greater demands on bearings and rotor dynamics. Direct lube
bearings have evolved to reduce the higher power losses, oil flow
requirements, and pad temperatures associated with higher surface
speeds. Direct lubrication is not a new concept as designs have been
used in special applications with a long history of reliability. Use of
direct lube journal bearings became more prevalent as machine size
and speed increased, eventually spawning several papers in the early
90s investigating their steady-state performance. These include
research by Booser (1990), Tanaka (1991), Harongozo, et al.
(1991), Brockwell, et al. (1992), and Fillon, et al. (1993).
The references document pad temperature reductions derived
from the efficient evacuation of hot oil from the bearing cavity.
Direct lube bearings are therefore typically designed for evacuated
operation, accomplished by opening up end seal and oil outlet
restrictions. A direct application of oil to the journal surface
prevents oil from bypassing the films, which can occur in
conventional bearings when outlet restrictions are removed. Use of
nozzles to spray oil on the journal surface between pads is one
method of direct lubrication. An additional pad temperature
advantage is gained by direct lubrication features.
Literature on vibration characteristics of direct lube journal
bearings is not as prevalent. DeCamillo and Clayton (1997) present
rotordynamic data for large, 18 inch (457 mm) generator bearings.
The tests showed comparable vibration response for conventional
and direct lube designs. Edney, et al. (1996), provide similar
information for a small, high-speed, multistage steam turbine with
4 inch (102 mm) diameter journal bearings. Peculiar, low-frequency,
radial vibrations were observed during these steam turbine tests, but
levels were low and acceptable. However, similar vibrations in a
high-speed compressor during acceptance tests in 1999 did encroach
upon acceptable API limits, and significant time and resources were
expended to address this issue (DeCamillo, 2006).
Personal experience and discussions among original equipment
manufacturers (OEMs) and users over the past few years indicate
that these low-frequency vibrations have been encountered in
turbines, compressors, and gearboxes, using conventional and
direct lube tilt-pad bearing designs. The signature has also been
documented in separate research investigating stability (Cloud,
2007). Accurate stability prediction is a major topic of concern in
the industry. Kocur, et al. (2007), highlight a large spread in
predicted bearing stiffness and damping coefficients among
computer codes, and associated ramifications regarding stability
assessment of critical turbomachinery. At the same time, there are
not many codes available that address direct lube performance and
dynamic coefficients (He, 2003; He, et al., 2005).
Researchers are presently attempting to sort through some difficult
questions. What is the source of the low-frequency vibrations? Are
they attributable to direct lube bearings, pad flutter, starvation,
high speeds, or low loads? Do they affect machine stability, safety,
or reliability?
This paper presents a chronology of tests, investigations, and
theoretical analyses aimed at providing answers to some of these
questions. It is desired that the information be of value to
researchers, OEMs, users, and other personnel involved with
hydrodynamic bearings and vibration in turbomachinery.
SSV HASH, DEFINITION
Figure 1 is an example radial vibration spectrum from a high-speed
compressor test using direct lube tilt-pad journal bearings. The
main subject of this paper is the low-frequency shaft vibrations
indicated in the figure. Unlike discrete subsynchronous spikes that
often indicate a serious problem, the vibrations are indiscrete and
of low-frequency and amplitude. The plot is paused to capture
the random, broadband frequencies. In order to distinguish the
subsynchronous vibration (SSV) characteristics under consideration,
the term SSV hash is defined for use in this paper:

SSV Hash: A vibration signature characterized by low-frequency,

low amplitude, broadband subsynchronous vibrations that
fluctuate randomly.
Figure 1. Example Radial, Low-Frequency, Broadband, Vibration.
Experience with turbomachinery bearing sizes 3.88 to 8.00 inches
(100 to 200 mm) in diameter has observed SSV hash frequencies
typically ranging up to 30 Hz with amplitudes on the order of 0.1 to
0.2 mils (.0025 to .0050 mm) peak-to-peak.
INITIAL INVESTIGATIONS
Delayed acceptance of a high-speed compressor due to SSV hash
in 1999 prompted a research project performed on a high-speed test
rig described in detail in a separate reference (Wilkes, et al., 2000).
Pertinent information is provided here for convenience. The rig has
a test shaft driven by a variable speed gas turbine through a flexible
coupling (Figure 2). The test shaft is approximately 5 feet (1.5 m)
long and 5 inches (127 mm) in diameter, supported at either end by
a pivoted shoe journal bearing. Two orthogonal proximity probes
are mounted inboard of each journal bearing, 45 degrees off
top-dead-center, to record radial shaft vibration. A spectrum
analyzer was used to acquire fast Fourier transform (FFT) vibration
PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTY-SEVENTHTURBOMACHINERY SYMPOSIUM 2008 12
Table of Contents
signatures, presented in paused plots in Figures 3 through 5. The
y-axis represents peak-to-peak amplitude in mils.
Figure 2. High-Speed Test Rig Journal Bearings and Shaft Schematic.
Figure 3. Evacuated Discharge Configuration, 3.0 gpm (11.4 l/min).
Figure 4. Flooded Discharge Configuration, 6.0 gpm (22.8 l/min).
Figure 5. Evacuated Discharge Configuration, 3.0 gpm (11.4 l/min),
SSV Grooves.
Fortunately, it was possible to duplicate the low-frequency
vibration signature in the test rig, which allowed a parametric
study of many journal bearing designs and configurations over the
course of this initial investigation. The data presented in Figures 3
through 5 are for direct lube, five-pad, leading-edge-groove
journal bearing tests at a shaft speed of 10,000 rpm and a low, 20
psi (0.14 MPa) projected load. The bearings have a nominal
diameter of 5 inches (127 mm) and an axial length of 2.25 inches
(57 mm). The pads are steel backed with a babbitt surface and
have a 60 degree angle and a 60 percent offset pivot. The
assembled bearing diametric clearance is 0.009 inch (0.23 mm)
and the nominal preload is 0.15. Tests were run with ISO VG 32
turbine oil supplied at 120F (49C).
The SSV hash indicated in Figure 3 was recorded for an oil
flow of 3.0 gpm (11.4 l/min) for the direct lube bearing in its
as-designed, evacuated oil discharge configuration. Tests found
that increasing the oil flow tended to reduce the amplitudes but
did not entirely eliminate the SSV hash signature. Elimination
required the installation of floating oil seals as well as an increase
in oil flow to 6.0 gpm (22.8 l/min), the results of which are shown
in Figure 4. This solution unfortunately required higher oil flow
and operated with higher power loss and pad temperatures than the
original design.
Methods were therefore pursued to address these performance
issues, and results began to suggest that the low frequencies
may be due to air entering the oil film. Based on this hypothesis,
a design was conceived that might eliminate SSV hash while
maintaining some direct lube benefits. The pads were modified
with narrow circumferential SSV grooves, cut in the babbitt
near the edges of the pads (Figure 5), to capture and redirect
side leakage toward the leading edge of the next pad (Wilkes
and DeCamillo, 2002). In this way, additional oil is made
available to the oil films without increasing the bulk oil flow to
the bearing.
The SSV groove pads were installed and tested in the original
evacuated condition (oil seals removed) with results shown in
Figure 5 for 3.0 gpm (11.4 l/min), and tested as low as 2.0 gpm (7.6
l/min) with negligible SSV hash indications. Of several methods
pursued during the course of this initial investigation, the grooves
were the only solution successful in eliminating SSV hash in an
evacuated configuration. The low oil flow and power loss of
the original design were maintained, with a slight penalty in pad
temperature due to the introduction of warm, side leakage oil back
into the oil film.
Another observation of this initial investigation was the
tendency for an increase in synchronous amplitudes when SSV
hash was eliminated, noticeable by comparing both the flooded
solution (Figure 4) and the evacuated groove solution
(Figure 5) with the original open discharge configuration data
of Figure 3.
SUBSEQUENT TESTS
Although solutions were obtained in initial investigations,
operating conditions were limited in load and speed. A subsequent
series of tests was initiated in 2005 to further investigate the
low-frequency vibrations. The same test rig was modified to
incorporate a radial load system in the bearing housing at the free
end of the shaft, shown schematically in Figure 6. The system
incorporates a hydraulic cylinder that loads through a dowel to a
single journal bearing loader shoe on top of the shaft. This pushes
down on the shaft and loads the test bearing. The applied load is
measured by a load cell below the hydraulic cylinder. A new data
acquisition system was used to acquire the data, and additional
proximity probes were installed to monitor the vibration of an
upper and a lower journal bearing pad. The pad proximity probes
were mounted in the bearing casing and targeted the trailing edge
of the back of the pads at the locations depicted schematically
in Figure 7.
13 JOURNAL BEARINGVIBRATIONAND SSV HASH
Table of Contents
Figure 6. Test Rig Radial Load System Schematic, Free End of Shaft.
Figure 7. Bearing Orientation and Pad Numbering.
The test bearings consist of a conventional center pivot bearing
with labyrinth end seals (Figure 8) and evacuated direct lube center
and offset pivot bearings. Three direct lube methods were tested:
spray nozzles (Figure 9), leading-edge-grooves (Figure 10), and
between-pad-grooves (Figure 11). Each bearing was tested for
load-on-pad and load-between-pad orientation over a range of
loads, oil flows, and speeds.
Figure 8. Conventional Bearing with Labyrinth End Seals.
Figure 9. Direct Lube Spray Nozzles, Evacuated Configuration.
Figure 10. Direct Lube Leading-Edge-Groove, Evacuated
Configuration.
Figure 11. Direct Lube Between-Pad-Groove, Evacuated
Configuration.
Bearing geometry, test oil viscosity, and inlet temperature are
the same as in earlier investigations except that the assembled
diametric clearance is 0.0072 inch (0.18 mm) and the nominal
preload is 0.25. Loads indicated in the following sections and
figures refer to the applied radial load. For data labeled no-load,
the journal bearings are supporting the weight of the shaft,
which gives a 20 psi (0.14 MPa) projected unit bearing load.
Each test bearing is installed around the free end of the shaft
without disturbing the coupling or the coupling end journal
bearing. The same coupling end journal bearing is used in all
tests. Vibration data were recorded while varying speed to
14,000 rpm, load to 400 psi (2.8 MPa), and oil flow to 30 gpm
(114 l/min), holding two of the parameters constant while the
other was varied.
The speed ramp data are used in this paper, presented in
color-coded FFT waterfall diagrams with a vertical scale
denoting peak-to-peak amplitude in mils. With Figure 12 as an
example, each waterfall diagram contains data for three separate
run-up/run-down speed ramps from 5000 to 14,000 to 5000 rpm
(83 to 233 to 83 Hz), one for each of three oil flows. The back
plane of the diagram contains a projection of all data. Vibrations
below 1 Hz are cut off to delete spurious 0 Hz indications from
obscuring the low frequencies under investigation and the data
are uncompensated, the main focus being the low-frequency
vibrations. As a guide, SSV hash amplitudes above 0.1 mils
(0.0025 mm) peak-to-peak are levels that have caused concern
in acceptance tests.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTY-SEVENTHTURBOMACHINERY SYMPOSIUM 2008 14
Table of Contents
Figure 12. Conventional Center Pivot, LBP, No-Load.
Shaft SSV Hash Trends
The volume of data for the different bearing designs allowed for an
assessment of trends in shaft SSV hash. This section describes those
that were fairly common for all test bearings. Conventional bearing
speed ramp data in Figures 12 through 15 are used for reference.
Figure 13. Conventional Center Pivot, LOP, No-Load.
Figure 14. Conventional Center Pivot, LBP, 400 psi (2.8 MPa).
Figure 15. Conventional Center Pivot, LOP, 400 psi (2.8 MPa).
Comparing data among the figures, it can be noticed that most
SSV hash indications occur at low flow and low load. The word
indications is carefully used in this generalization. Although
there were more indications at low flow and low load for most
bearing designs, SSV hash amplitudes were sometimes higher at
other operating conditions, as evidenced in results later in this paper.
Other common trends derived from the study are that SSV hash
levels for no-load data were similar for load-between-pad (LBP)
and load-on-pad (LOP) orientations (e.g., Figures 12 and 13). A
curious result was that while SSV hash decreased with applied load
for load-between-pad orientation (e.g., Figure 12 versus 14) there
was only a small change with load for load-on-pad orientation
(e.g., Figure 13 versus 15). Consequently, load-on-pad orientation
had higher SSV hash levels than load-between-pad orientation at
higher loads for all test bearings.
It is worth noting that initial investigations and field reports were
for high-speed applications with relatively light rotors, and so SSV
hash was formerly associated with high-speed and low-load. The
test data in these subsequent series of tests indicate that this is not
exactly true. Although indications were more pronounced at low
loads, tests indicate there can be undesirable levels of SSV hash in
the case of load-on-pad orientation at higher loads, for example
Figure 15 at 400 psi (2.8 MPa). There were also many indications
at lower speeds in the test data, again using Figure 15 as an example.
Conventional Versus Direct Lubrication
Figure 16 displays no-load data for the conventional center pivot
test bearing with load-on-pad orientation, the same used in Figure
13, but zoomed in on the lower frequencies and amplitudes under
investigation. Figure 17 contains comparable, center pivot,
between-pad-groove direct lube data. A condition mentioned
earlier is noticeable in the direct lube data, i.e., there are more SSV
hash indications at low flow but with higher amplitudes at an
intermediate condition, 8 gpm (30 l/min) and 11,000 rpm in this
particular test. The figure also supports observations from field
experience and initial investigations where SSV hash decreases,
but is not necessarily eliminated at higher flows.
Comparisons between conventional and direct lube results (Figures
16 and 17) are fairly straightforward. Direct lube data have noticeable
SSV hash indications at 8 gpm (30 l/min) whereas conventional
bearing levels are negligible. Conversely, very high subsynchronous
vibrations are noticeable in conventional bearing data at 4 gpm (15
l/min) where the direct lube design has significantly lower SSV
hash indications.
These data indicate that flooding and oil flow are not the only
key parameters influencing SSV hash. Conventional bearing tests
with labyrinth seals (Figure 16), and initial tests with oil seal rings
15 JOURNAL BEARINGVIBRATIONAND SSV HASH
Table of Contents
(Figure 4), both required some increase in oil flow to eliminate the
signature, whereas higher oil flow is not as effective in evacuated
designs (e.g., Figure 17). This suggests cavity pressure may be
another influential parameter that, unfortunately, was not measured.
Calculated pressure drops across oil discharge restrictions indicate
that cavity pressures between 0.5 and 2.0 psig (0.04 and 0.14 bar)
were present when SSV hash was noticeably reduced. Also fitting
this scenario are the lower SSV hash indications in direct lube
designs compared to the conventional bearing data at low flow
(Figure 17 versus 16), which may be attributable to the more direct
application of oil to the oil films.
Figure 16. Conventional Center Pivot, LOP, No-Load.
Figure 17. Direct Lube Between-Pad-Groove, Center Pivot, LOP,
No-Load.
Center Versus Offset Pivot
Center versus offset pivot tests were conducted for several direct
lube bearing configurations. Comparisons have been difficult to
quantify. For example, spray nozzle offset pivot data (Figure 18)
have high amplitudes and a broad band of SSV hash midway through
the 4 gpm (15 l/min) data speed ramps at approximately 12,000
rpm, indicated in the figure. At the same conditions, spray nozzle
center pivot data (Figure 19) have less broadband indications, and
amplitudes are actually highest at approximately 6000 rpm. In 8 and
12 gpm data (30 and 45 l/min), the offset pivot has slightly less SSV
hash. Similar comparisons for between-pad-groove tests (Figure 17
versus 20) show lower SSV hash levels in the offset pivot data at
4 gpm (15 l/min), and only subtle differences at the higher flows.
Figure 18. Direct Lube Spray, Offset Pivot, LOP, No-Load.
Figure 19. Direct Lube Spray, Center Pivot, LOP, No-Load.
Figure 20. Direct Lube Between-Pad-Groove, Offset Pivot, LOP,
No-Load.
The results were unexpected in that offset pivot designs require
more oil flow to the films, and it was suspected that this would be
clearly reflected in SSV hash levels. The data indicate there are
factors other than bulk oil flow that need to be taken into account
regarding SSV hash and pivot offset.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTY-SEVENTHTURBOMACHINERY SYMPOSIUM 2008 16
Table of Contents
Variations Among Direct Lube Designs
Three offset pivot, direct lube bearings were tested to compare
shaft SSV hash characteristics among different methods of direct
lubrication. All three have an evacuated discharge configuration.
The methods include spray nozzles, leading-edge-grooves, and
between-pad-grooves. Photographs of the direct lube features are
provided in Figures 9 through 11, and corresponding vibration data
are contained in Figures 19 through 21.
Figure 21. Direct Lube Leading-Edge-Groove, Offset Pivot, LOP,
No-Load.
In general, all three direct lube methods display noticeable SSV
hash indications. Variations in amplitudes and frequencies make it
difficult to generalize the results. The spray nozzles produced the
highest levels of SSV hash. The leading-edge-groove operated
with lower SSV hash amplitudes but at higher frequencies, and
between-pad-groove SSV hash levels were lower for all conditionsin
comparison with spray nozzle data. Results comparing between-pad-
groove and leading-edge-groove data vary with operating conditions.
SSV hash levels at 4 gpm (15 l/min) are negligible and lower than the
leading-edge-groove. At higher flows, between-pad-groove SSV hash
amplitudes are higher but occur at a lower frequency.
Distinct differences in shaft SSV hash signatures are obvious
among the designs. Some speed dependence is noticeable in spray
nozzle data (Figure 18), and more so in leading-edge-groove data
(Figure 21), which appears to be suppressed at higher speeds.
Between-pad-groove characteristics (Figure 20) do not show
variations with speed, and seem sensitive to a particular speed band
depending on flow. There are also many conditions throughout
Figures 18 through 21 where the evacuated direct lube bearings
operate with negligible SSV hash indications.
While the reasons for the variations are still under investigation,
the fact that there are differences provides valuable information.
Since the pad geometry is the same for the different bearings, the
direct lube feature itself is influencing the shaft SSV hash and,
because these are evacuated designs, the influence is most likely
occurring at the entrance or leading edge of the oil film.
Pad/Shaft Correlation Investigation
A review of 2005 vibration data from the upper and lower pad
proximity probes (depicted in Figure 7), noted more subsynchronous
indications in the upper pad, with the highest amplitudes occurring at
high-load and low-flow conditions in many cases. This is reasonable
considering that the upper pad clearance increases as the shaft is
pushed down under load, away from the upper pad. The upper pad oil
film consequently generates lower hydrodynamic forces and requires
more oil flow to fill the gap. Unfortunately, an unexpected result of
the investigation was that there were only a few random correlations
between upper pad and shaft SSV hash for the broad range of
operating conditions and bearing configurations tested.
This lack of correlation prompted another series of tests in
2006 with all pads monitored by proximity probes, installed
and positioned as described earlier, and made possible by the
acquisition of new high-speed vibration equipment. Figure A-1
(refer to APPENDIX A) organizes shaft and pad vibration data
for a leading-edge-groove bearing test at 200 psi (1.38 MPa),
for a load-on-pad configuration as an example. The waterfall
diagrams are arranged so that data for the orthogonal shaft
probes and all five pads can be viewed in relation to one
another. The same scales are used for all waterfall diagrams in
the figure. It is important to note that the shaft was removed and
refurbished between 2005 and 2006 tests and a different
coupling end journal bearing installed, so data are not comparable
to information from earlier tests.
Referring to Figure A-1, it can be noticed that the subsynchronous
vibrations in unloaded pad 2 at 4 gpm (15 l/min) do not correlate
with either of the orthogonal shaft probes (labeled +45 degrees and
45 degrees in the figure). A unique observation is that the side
pads 3 and 5, which were not monitored in previous tests, have the
strongest subsynchronous vibrations and show excellent correlation
with the shaft SSV hash indications.
Pad/Shaft Correlation General Trends
The observations from Figure A-1 relate to a specific bearing
and set of operating conditions. Comparisons of data for all five
pads, over a broad range of operating conditions for the different
bearing designs allowed for a more precise assessment of pad/shaft
interaction. The following observations and trends were determined
to be fairly common for all test bearings.
All shaft SSV hash indications observed in these tests were
confirmed to correlate with vibrations from at least one of the five
pads. The converse is not true. There were many instances where
subsynchronous vibrations from individual pads did not appear in
any shaft data. An important observation is that the shaft SSV hash
indications most often correlated with one or more of the side pads,
depending on bearing type and orientation. The orientation and pad
number schematic in Figure 7 is helpful in explaining the following
observations and trends.
In the case of load-between-pad orientation under some light
downward loading, side pad 1, side pad 3, or both tended to
correlate with the shaft SSV hash indications. Upper pad 2 had
more and higher subsynchronous vibration than the side pads in
many cases, but rarely correlated with the shaft indications. Noted
earlier, shaft SSV hash decreased with applied load in the case of
load-between-pad orientation, which is reasonable considering the
high horizontal stiffness of this orientation with the shaft supported
between the two bottom pads. At the same time, pads 1, 2, and 3
become less strongly coupled to the shaft and may still experience
subsynchronous vibrations, but with hydrodynamic forces too
weak to affect the shaft.
For a load-on-pad orientation under some light downward
loading, the side pads (1, 2, 3, and 5), individually or in combinations,
tended to correlate with the shaft SSV hash indications. The
correlation varied with bearing type and operating conditions, and
is also likely influenced by any slight skew in applied load vector
and differences in manufacturing heights of the individual pads for
this particular orientation. Noted earlier, shaft SSV hash did not
decrease as much with applied load for load-on-pad orientation,
which is reasonable considering the weak horizontal stiffness for
this orientation. Pad 3 and pad 5 tended to correlate more with the
shaft SSV hash indications as load was applied. At the same time,
pads 1 and 2 become less strongly coupled to the shaft and may still
experience subsynchronous indications, but with hydrodynamic
forces too weak to affect the shaft.
SSV Grooves, Recent Tests
The SSV groove modification (Figure 5), developed during
initial investigations in 1999, has since been successfully applied in
JOURNAL BEARINGVIBRATIONAND SSV HASH 17
Table of Contents
many compressor, turbine, and gearbox applications. At the time,
development was based on hypotheses and shaft vibration data.
Upgrades in the test rig capability and in high-speed data acquisition
equipment has more recently allowed an investigation of the
grooves influence on pad vibration.
SSV grooves were machined in the leading-edge-groove pads
used for results presented in Figure A-1 and were tested over the full
range of operating conditions for load-on-pad and load-between
pad orientation. Test results for the same conditions and orientation
as Figure A-1 are presented in Figure A-2 (refer to APPENDIX A)
as an example comparison. The tests found that subsynchronous
levels in all pads were significantly reduced or eliminated over the
full range of test operating conditions and configurations, and
confirmed the effectiveness of the method in eliminating shaft SSV
hash in evacuated, direct lube bearing designs.
THEORETICAL INVESTIGATIONS
To help shed some light on these SSV hash measurements, the
bearing geometry and operating conditions corresponding with the
data in Figure A-1 were modeled using an algorithm developed by He
(2003). This algorithm includes the effects of supply flowrate in its
determination of a bearings steady-state (eccentricity, temperatures,
power loss, etc.) and dynamic (stiffness and damping) performance
based on the theories and experiments put forth by Heshmat
(1991). Since the measurements presented in these SSV hash tests
demonstrate the importance of supply flow on SSV, any theoretical
investigation must account for supply flowrate effects.
Supply Flowrate Effects
The model applies to any bearing configuration where the
supply flowrate is not sufficient to ensure a full film across all the
pads surfaces. In this case, the model will predict a partial
starvation at the inlet region of some of the pads. Unlike the full
film situation where a continuous lubricant film starts at the pad
leading edge, in a partially starved situation, the continuous film is
formed downstream at some point where the clearance is sufficiently
reduced. This physical phenomenon was observed and studied by
Heshmat (1991) on a two axial groove, sleeve bearing.
Figure 22 illustrates predicted starvation effects for pad number 3,
corresponding with the test data pad numbers in Figure A-1. With a
supply flowrate of 8 gpm to the bearing, the film is able to generate
pressure across the pads entire arc length. Reducing the bearing flow
to 4 gpm lowers overall pressure distribution, but the pad still
produces pressure across almost all of its arc length. The pad is
clearly partially starved at 3 gpm where no film pressure is produced
at the inlet film region. Decreasing the flow to 2 gpm expands the
starved inlet region. At this flow level, pressure levels are very small
and the pivot is nearly centered within the positive pressure region.
Partial starvation has effectively reduced the pads pivot offset, which
may explain unexpected results in center versus offset pivot tests.
Figure 22. Partial Starvation Effects on Pad Film Pressure.
Pad Responsiveness
Since test results confirm that the individual pad motions are
involved in this SSV hash phenomenon, the tilting-pad bearings
full coefficients predicted by the modeling algorithm are of
primary interest. For a tilting-pad bearing with N
pad
pads, the full
coefficients consist of 5N
pad
+4 stiffness and 5N
pad
+4 damping
coefficients. Described in detail by Shapiro and Colsher (1977)
and Parsell, et al. (1983), these full coefficients relate pad and
shaft motions to forces and moments on the shaft and pads. For
rotordynamic purposes, the magnitude of each individual coefficient
is overlooked, focusing instead on their combined or reduced
coefficients (four stiffnesses and four dampings). Closer scrutiny
and understanding of these full coefficients are required when pad
dynamics become the focus.
Table 1 presents the stiffness full coefficients for a 60 percent
offset, LOP, five-pad bearing with 12 gpm supply flowrate where:
Fx and Fy = Horizontal and vertical forces on the shaft
x and y = Horizontal and vertical shaft displacements
M
1
M
5
= Moments on pads 1 through 5

1

5
= Tilt angle changes on pads 1 through 5
Table 1. Stiffness Full Coefficients for the 60 Percent Offset LOP
Bearing, 11,475 rpm, 200 psi.
Each value in Table 1 represents a stiffness, either Fx or M
divided by x, y, or depending on the position in the table.
Examining a few of these Table 1 coefficients will help explain the
physical meaning behind them. Tilt angle changes of the fourth pad
(
4
) produce the largest vertical force on the shaft (F
y
), since it
has the highest value of K
y
(3.261e6 lbf/rad). This is due to the
fourth pad being on the bottom, supporting the majority of the
load. Conversely, tilt angle changes on the second pad, located in
the upper half of the bearing, produce the smallest vertical force on
the shaft (K
y
= 0.499e6 lbf/rad). The fourth pad is also the most
difficult to tilt with the highest tilting stiffness K

value (1.614e6
lbf-in/rad), while the second pad is the easiest to tilt (K

= 0.245e6
lbf-in/rad). Tilting motions of the other four pads do not directly
cause any moments on the loaded pad. The pads can only effectively
communicate to each other through the shaft.
Some of the full coefficients along with the pads polar inertia (I
p
)
form the equation of motion for pad tilting. A simplified version of
this equation, using a pads tilting stiffness K

and damping C

, is
given by:
where M
ext
is an external moment being applied. This equation can
be used to examine the frequency response characteristics of each
pads tilting motion. Each pads frequency response function (FRF)
H() is given by:
An FRFs magnitude indicates how responsive a pad is to
external moments trying to excite it. Examining the predicted
FRFs of each pad as a function of supply flowrate provides for a
direct comparison with the pad waterfall diagrams of the test data.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTY-SEVENTHTURBOMACHINERY SYMPOSIUM 2008 18
Table of Contents
Figure 23 presents the predicted H() of pad 3 in Figure A-1 as
an example, focusing on the low frequency region below 60 Hz.
Regardless of flow, the frequency response remains relatively flat
as a function of excitation frequency with no peaks present. This is
because the pads tilting motions remain overdamped for all the
flowrates examined. An overdamped system (critical damping
greater than 100 percent) has no damped natural frequency,
resulting in no peaks in its response.
Figure 23. H() with Decreasing Supply Flow.
It is unclear as to the exact cause of the 8 Hz peak in Figure
A-1s waterfall diagram for pad 3. One explanation is that there
may be a predominant excitation at this frequency. Heshmat
(1991) observed a pulse excitation at similar low frequency
levels in his starvation experiments on a sleeve bearing.
Another possibility may be that the pad is actually underdamped,
which the model has not been able to predict. In this case, a
broadband excitation would result in a definitive peak at the
pads damped natural frequency. Nothing indicates that the
peak is associated with an unstable, self-excited phenomenon,
since the pads tilting damping C

remains greater than or

equal to zero. All indications are that the observed vibrations
are forced in nature.
Both the measurements in Figure A-1 and the predicted FRF in
Figure 23 show that the third pads overall responsiveness does
dramatically increase as supply flow is reduced. According to
the predictions in Figure 23, this pad responds very little to
excitations until the bearing flow is reduced below approximately
4 gpm. This increased sensitivity correlates well with the predicted
pressure profiles in Figure 22. Below 4 gpm, the predictions in
Figure 22 show that the pad becomes partially starved at the
leading edge with low overall film pressures. These lower film
pressures allow the pad to respond to external moment excitations
more easily.
According to the H() equation, the low frequency responsiveness
of an individual pad is largely dictated by its tilting stiffness, K

.
Figure 24 presents the calculated tilting stiffness of all five pads as
supply flow is varied. With the exception of the fourth pad,
reducing supply flow causes a decrease in all the pads tilting
stiffnesses. Below 5 gpm, the fourth pads stiffness begins to
increase as it supports more of the entire bearing load. The strength
of this tilting stiffness means the fourth pad does not easily respond
to excitations, which correlates well with its relatively low vibrations
in Figure A-1.
Figure 24. Tilting Stiffness of Individual Pads Versus Supply Flow.
When a pad becomes unloaded, it applies no pressure force on
the shaft and its full coefficient stiffness and damping terms go to
zero. The pad then moves like a rigid body and its tilting FRF is
dictated by the polar inertia. The upper pads (1 and 2) become
unloaded first as flow is reduced (Figure 24). This is because their
larger film thicknesses require the most flow to maintain a full film
along their entire surface. With smaller film thicknesses, the third
and fifth pads remain loaded until below 2 gpm. These two pads
tilting stiffness values are low in magnitude at reduced flowrates,
resulting in the increased responsiveness observed in Figure 23.
CONCLUSIONS
A series of tests and analyses were performed to investigate a
peculiar, low-frequency, low amplitude, broadband subsynchronous
vibration, termed SSV hash, that has been witnessed in different
types of turbomachinery using tilting pad journal bearings.
Based on a study of test results for conventional and direct lube
designs over a broad range of speeds, loads, and oil flows, the
following shaft SSV hash trends were found to be fairly common
for all test bearings:

There were more SSV hash indications at low flow and low
load, although amplitudes were sometimes higher at other
operating conditions.

SSV hash levels at light loads were similar for load-between-pad

and load-on-pad bearing orientations.

Shaft SSV hash decreased with applied load for load-between-pad

orientation, but there was only a small change with load for
load-on-pad orientation.

Consequently, load-on-pad operation produced higher SSV hash

levels than load-between-pad orientation at higher loads.
The following general trends for pad/shaft vibration correlation
were found fairly common for all test bearings based on tests of
bearing designs with vibration measurements of all five pads:

All shaft SSV hash indications were confirmed to correlate with

vibrations of at least one of the five pads.

The converse is not true. There were subsynchronous vibrations in

individual pads that did not appear in measured shaft vibration data.

The side pads most often correlated with shaft SSV hash
indications. The top upper pad for load-between-pad orientation
had the highest subsychronous indications in many cases, but
rarely correlated with any shaft data.
JOURNAL BEARINGVIBRATIONAND SSV HASH 19
Table of Contents
The following specific observations were noted in test data
comparisons of bearing types and geometries:

It is incorrect to associate SSV hash only with high-speed,

low-load applications. Indications were noted over a broad range of
operating conditions.

Shaft SSV hash has been observed in conventional bearing designs

at low oil flow. The data indicate that merely flooding the cavity is
insufficient to suppress shaft SSV hash. At these conditions, direct
lube designs operate with lower levels of shaft SSV hash, attributed
to the more direct application of oil to the film.

At intermediate test oil flows, shaft SSV hash is more pronounced

in evacuated, direct lube bearings and can be reduced, but not
necessarily eliminated, by increasing oil flow. Amplitudes appear
sensitive to certain operating conditions, around which are conditions
where the evacuated direct lube bearings operated with negligible
SSV hash indications.

There were mixed results in SSV hash comparisons of center

versus offset pivot direct lube test data. The offset pivot pads in
most cases operated with the same to slightly less SSV hash
indications than the center pivot pads.

Comparisons among three direct lube methods noted distinct

differences in shaft SSV hash signatures, the results suggesting that
the differences originate at the entrance or leading edge of the
oil film.
Overall, the various tests and comparisons indicate there are
factors other than flooding and bulk oil flow that contribute to SSV
hash behavior.
There were two solutions determined from test data that
eliminated the SSV hash signature:

The first required flooding the bearing cavity, using labyrinth or

floating seals and increased oil flow. The solution was effective for
direct lube designs as well, but resulted in higher power loss, flow
requirements, and pad temperatures comparable to a conventional,
flooded design.

The second was a modification consisting of patented SSV

grooves cut in the babbitt near the edges of the pad, to capture and
redirect side leakage toward the leading edge of the next pad. This
solution was successful in eliminating SSV hash in an evacuated
configuration. Low oil flow and power loss were maintained, with
a slight penalty in pad temperature due to the introduction of warm,
side leakage oil back into the oil film.

In both cases, the elimination of SSV hash increased synchronous

amplitudes.
The following conclusions are derived from the theoretical
investigation of SSV hash:

A tilting pad bearings full coefficients can be used to assess the

dynamics of individual pads.

Using the full coefficients of one of the test bearings, theoretical

investigations suggest that the observed SSV hash is likely a forced
vibration phenomenon.

Theoretical predictions indicate that a pads responsiveness at

low frequencies increases when there is insufficient oil to provide
for a full film.

At lower supply flowrates, predicted partial starvation at the

leading edge progresses, which reduces the pads tilting stiffness,
making it more responsive to excitation.
DISCUSSIONS
Many questions arose over the course of the tests and analyses
and during review of the initial drafts of this paper. The following
discussions comment on topics that are not necessarily derived
directly from the test results and analyses. As such, the discussions
are subject to debate, which is welcome.
Possible Source of Excitation
Test results and analyses indicate that the shaft SSV hash
indications are caused by pad vibration with response characteristics
indicative of a forced vibration. Since there were no means in the
SSV hash test apparatus to visualize the flow in the bearing,
possible sources of excitation can only be surmised from the test
results presented in this paper. Instead, attention is directed to
Heshmat (1991), who did observe a periodic phenomenon in his
visualization experiments of oil streamlets in an axial groove
journal bearing. The phenomenon is reported as a pulse that
periodically transformed the starved region of the leading edge
film into a pattern of oil streamlets. This pulse occurred every
0.5 to 1.0 seconds and its frequency varied with the degree
of starvation.
This phenomenon is consistent with many of the observations
from these SSV hash investigations. Test data and analyses both
show an increased sensitivity to SSV hash at reduced flowrates.
A periodic pulse excitation can explain dominant SSV hash
amplitudes at intermediate operating conditions, i.e., peaks noticeable
in Figures 17 through 22, as well as difference in SSVhash signatures
among test bearings, which may be attributable to the influence of
the different supply methods on the excitation.
Pad Vibration and Damage
Pad flutter, babbitt fatigue, and pivot fretting are often brought
up as topics of concern regarding SSV hash. The babbitt damage
studied by Adams and Payandeh (1982) was a major concern in
large, conventional, flooded bearings, attributed to self-excited,
subsynchronous vibrations of unloaded pads with frequency ratios
approximately 0.50 that of running speed. The term pad flutter is
often used to describe this motion, and spragging is often used
to describe more violent, full clearance vibrations with forces
sufficient to fatigue the babbitt and fret the pivots.
The pad vibrations associated with SSV hash do not conform to
these characteristics. Subsynchronous amplitudes are at least an
order of magnitude less than the bearing clearance, and frequency
ratios are more on the order of 0.10 on average. Babbitt fatigue is
not considered a concern in regard to the SSV hash characteristics
described in this paper.
Fretting is a more difficult phenomenon to assess analytically.
Vibrations certainly contribute to fretting, but there are many
sources of vibration in turbomachinery. The only information that
can be offered from the SSV hash test series in this respect is that
there were no indications of fretting, or babbitt fatigue, in individual
test pads after 600 hours of operation.
Bearing Clearance, Preload, Pivot Offset
It would seem that preload, via reduced bearing clearance, would
reduce shaft SSV hash and that increasing the pivot offset should
make it worse. It was therefore unexpected when center versus
offset pivot tests showed lower levels for offset pivot operation.
Hindsight from the test results and analyses indicate other
factors are involved, e.g., proximity of the individual pads to the
shaft, the magnitude of their hydrodynamic forces, sensitivity to
excitation, etc., which make it difficult to generalize cause and
effect. Although preload and clearance tests were not complete at
the time of this paper, scenarios where preload might invoke pad
vibration and shaft SSV hash can be envisioned when considering
the other influences.
With multiple factors and complex pad/shaft interactions, cause
and effect scenarios for clearance, preload, offset, and other geometry
should be performed by analysis rather than generalizations. The
analyses presented in the theory section of the paper are useful
tools for assessing new designs, as well as evaluating changes to
existing designs.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTY-SEVENTHTURBOMACHINERY SYMPOSIUM 2008 20
Table of Contents
SSV Hash: Issue, Nonissue, Allowable Levels
The many types of turbomachinery and the wide array of sizes and
operating conditions suggest caution against generalizations. There
are applications running with SSV hash with no reported problems,
and DeCamillo and Clayton (1997) and Edney, et al. (1996), provide
rotordynamic data showing some level of flow reduction is possible
without affecting rotor response. On the other hand, Edney, et al.
(1996), do report problems when flow is reduced too much, which is
logical and also supported by the theoretical analyses.
Personal experience with SSV hash for turbomachinery bearing
sizes 3.88 to 8.00 inches (100 to 200 mm) in diameter generally
falls within API guidelines. In comparisons with API 617 (2002)
nonsynchronous limits, for example, levels are typically less then
0.2 mils (.0050 mm) peak-to-peak. Actually, SSV hash more often
is a consideration in overall vibration limitations, as nonsynchronous
frequencies are typically below 0.25 times the maximum continuous
speed and are indiscrete. Noted earlier, elimination of SSV hash
tended to increase synchronous amplitudes in tests. This is brought
up neither as an issue or nonissue, but to provide information that
overall vibration levels may not decrease as much as anticipated
when SSV hash is eliminated.
Issues more often arise when other specifications further limit
allowable SSV indications or, as stated earlier, because of
uncertainty regarding the cause and nature of the vibration. In this
case, solutions and test results in this paper can be used to address
the situation. A more challenging issue is complying with multiple
spec limitations in more severe applications. It seems that many of
the parameters that reduce SSV hash tend to increase power loss,
flow requirement, and pad temperature, or produce undesirable rotor
response. Flooding and pressurized bearing cavities, rotordynamic
preference for center pivot load-on-pad configurations, and tighter
clearances are some examples.
There is certainly the need for more research and development,
experimental and theoretical, on the subject of SSV hash including
its effects on dynamic coefficients, rotor response, and stability.
In the meantime, the authors hope that the tests and analytical
investigations presented in this paper will provide a useful
reference for topics related to SSV hash.
JOURNAL BEARINGVIBRATIONAND SSV HASH 21
APPENDIX A
Figure A-1. Direct Lube Leading-Edge-Groove, LOP, 200 psi (1.38 MPa), No SSV Grooves.
Table of Contents
REFERENCES
Adams, M. L. and Payandeh, S., 1983, Self-Excited Vibration of
Statically Unloaded Pads in Tilting-Pad Journal Bearings,
ASME Journal of Lubrication Technology, 105, pp. 377-384.
API 617, 2002, Axial and Centrifugal Compressors and
Expander-Compressors for Petroleum, Chemical and Gas
Industry, Seventh Edition, American Petroleum Institute,
Washington, D.C.
Booser, E. R., 1990, Parasitic Power Losses in Turbine Bearings,
STLE Tribology Transactions, 33, pp. 157-162.
Brockwell, K., Dmochowski, W., and DeCamillo, S., 1992,
Performance Evaluation of the LEG Tilting Pad Journal
Bearing, IMechE Seminar Plain BearingsPlain Bearings
Energy Efficiency and Design, MEP, London, United
Kingdom, pp. 51-58.
Cloud, C. H., 2007, Stability of Rotors Supported on Tilting Pad
Journal Bearings, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Virginia,
Charlottesville, Virginia.
DeCamillo, S. and Clayton, P. J., 1997, Performance Tests of an
18-Inch Diameter, Leading Edge Groove Pivoted Shoe Journal
Bearing, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on
Hydrodynamic BearingRotor System Dynamics, Xian,
China, pp. 409-413.
DeCamillo, S., 2006, Current Issues Regarding Unusual
Conditions in High-Speed Turbomachinery, Keynote
Presentation, 5th EDF & LMS Poitiers Workshop Bearing
Behavior Under Unusual Operating Conditions Proceedings,
pp A.1-A.10.
Edney, S. L., Waite, J. K., and DeCamillo, S. M., 1996, Profiled
Leading Edge Groove Tilting Pad Journal Bearing for
Light Load Operation, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth
Turbomachinery Symposium, Turbomachinery Laboratory,
Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, pp. 1-16.
Fillon, M., Bligoud, J. C., and Frene, J., 1993, Influence of the
Lubricant Feeding Method on the Thermohydrodynamic
Characteristics of Tilting Pad Journal Bearings, Proceedings
of the 6th International Congress on Tribology, Budapest,
Hungary, 4, pp. 7-10.
Harangozo, A. V., Stolarski, T. A., and Gozdawa, R. J., 1991, The
Effect of Different Lubrication Methods on the Performance of
a Tilting Pad Journal Bearing, STLE Tribology Transactions,
34, pp. 529-536.
He, M., 2003, Thermoelastohydrodynamic Analysis of Fluid Film
Journal Bearings, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Virginia,
Charlottesville, Virginia.
He, M., Cloud, C. H., and Byrne, J. M., 2005, Fundamentals of
Fluid Film Journal Bearing Operation and Modeling,
Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth Turbomachinery Symposium,
Turbomachinery Laboratory, Texas A&M University, College
Station, Texas, pp. 155-175.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTY-SEVENTHTURBOMACHINERY SYMPOSIUM 2008 22
Figure A-2. Direct Lube Leading-Edge-Groove, LOP, 200 psi (1.38 MPa), with SSV Grooves.
Table of Contents
Heshmat, H., 1991, The Mechanism of Cavitation in
Hydrodynamic Lubrication, STLETribology Transactions, 34,
(2), pp. 177-186.
Kocur, J. A., Nicholas, J. C., and Lee, C. C., 2007, Surveying Tilting
Pad Journal Bearing and Gas Labyrinth Seal Coefficients and
Their Effect on Rotor Stability, Proceedings of the Thirty-Sixth
Turbomachinery Symposium, Turbomachinery Laboratory, Texas
A&M University, College Station, Texas, pp. 1-10.
Parsell, J. K., Allaire, P. E., and Barrett, L. E., 1983, Frequency
Effects in Tilting-Pad Journal Bearing Dynamic Coefficients,
ASLE Transactions, 26, (2), pp. 222-227.
Shapiro, W. and Colsher, R., 1977, Dynamic Characteristics of
Fluid-Film Bearings, Proceedings of the Sixth Turbomachinery
Symposium, Turbomachinery Laboratory, Texas A&M
University, College Station, Texas, pp. 39-53.
Tanaka, M., 1991, Thermohydrodynamic Performance of a Tilting
Pad Journal Bearing with Spot Lubrication, ASME Journal of
Tribology, 113, pp. 615-619.
Wilkes, J. J., DeCamillo, S. M., Kuzdzal, M. J., and Mordell, J. D.,
2000, Evaluation of a High Speed, Light Load Phenomenon
in Tilting-Pad Thrust Bearings, Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth
Turbomachinery Symposium, Turbomachinery Laboratory, Texas
A&M University, College Station, Texas, pp. 177-185.
Wilkes, J. and DeCamillo, S., 2002, Journal Bearing, United
States Patent No. 6,361,215 B1, Mar. 26, 2002.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors would like to thank colleagues at Kingsbury, Inc., for
their special efforts and help in acquiring and preparing data and
information for this technical paper. The authors would also like to
especially acknowledge John Kocur of ExxonMobil, Brian Pettinato
of Elliott, and Thomas Soulas of Dresser-Rand, among others, for
their help and expertise in discussions of the subject matter.
JOURNAL BEARINGVIBRATIONAND SSV HASH 23
Table of Contents
PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTY-SEVENTHTURBOMACHINERY SYMPOSIUM 2008 24
Table of Contents